Abstract
Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss., an endemic and endangered medicinal and aromatic plant in Iran, showcases distinct botanical characteristics and therapeutic promise. According to the IUCN grouping criteria, this plant is facing challenges due to overcollection from its natural habitats. To address this issue, there is an increasing inclination towards cultivating this species within agricultural systems. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of applying Fe2O3 nanoparticles (NPs) at varying concentrations (50, 100, and 200 mg L-1), as well as bulk Fe2O3 at the same concentrations, on the growth, essential oil production, antioxidant capacity, total phenol, and flavonoid content of D. kotschyi. The foliar application of 100 and/or 200 mg L-1 of Fe2O3 NPs resulted in the greatest leaf length and dry weight, while Fe2O3 NPs at the level of 100 mg L-1 led to the highest leaf/stem ratio. Additionally, spraying 200 mg L-1 of Fe2O3 NPs and all concentrations of bulk Fe2O3 positively impacted chlorophyll and carotenoid levels. Both nano and bulk Fe2O3 supplements stimulated H2O2 production and subsequently enhanced enzymatic antioxidant activity. The use of 50 mg L-1 of Fe2O3 NPs resulted in the highest flavonoid content and non-enzymatic antioxidant activity. Meanwhile, the highest essential oil content and yield was achieved by the application of 50 and/or 100 mg L-1 Fe2O3 NPs. The addition of low concentration of Fe2O3 NPs (50 mg L-1) resulted in a significant increase in the concentration of geranial, while a higher supply of Fe2O3 NPs (200 mg L-1) significantly decreased the percentage of neral in the essential oil. Overall, the application of Fe2O3 NPs demonstrated significant potential for increased biomass, enhanced yield, essential oil production, and phytochemical attributes. The findings highlight the versatility of Fe2O3 NPs at optimal concentrations, acting as both a nano-fertilizer and a nano-inducer, promoting the production and accumulation of valuable secondary metabolites in plants.
1 Introduction
Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss., a perennial herb belonging to the Lamiaceae, is a valuable medicinal plant endemic to Iran. It grows in cold and high-altitude areas (). This herb is renowned for its natural food flavoring properties and has been traditionally used to treat various diseases including rheumatism, gastrointestinal disorders, and asthma (). Numerous studies have demonstrated the antioxidant, antibacterial, anticancer, antidiabetic, anti-hyperlipidemia, anti-inflammatory, antispasmodic, and immunomodulatory properties of D. kotschyi (). The essential oil of D. kotschyi is rich in terpenes such as 1,8-cineole, carvone, carvacrol, (E)-caryophyllene, neral, menthone, limonene, and α-terpineol (). Currently, there is a growing demand for the wild collection of this endemic plant to meet the needs of the food and pharmaceutical industries. However, this practice poses challenges like the extinction of landraces, the decline in genetic diversity, and unreliable herbaceous material supply. To address these issues, there is a focus on domestication and cultivation to safeguard genetic resources and ensure a sustainable supply of raw plant material ().
The biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in plants is influenced by various environmental factors, including climate, soil, nutrition, and ecological conditions (; ). Consequently, potential changes in environmental conditions can pose challenges for the growth and development of certain medicinal species (). The presence of active substances in plants is a result of their interaction with the environment over a long evolutionary process. The production and alterations of these substances are closely correlated and associated with environmental factors. Some substances are only synthesized under specific conditions, while the levels of certain substances may substantially increase under particular circumstances ().
Iron is crucial for plant growth and ranks as the fourth most prevalent element in the Earth’s crust. Iron plays a vital role in chlorophyll and DNA biosynthesis, photosynthesis, respiration, nitrogen fixation, energy transfer, and the activity of certain enzymes such as cytochrome oxidase, peroxidase, and catalase (). Iron-sulfur proteins are involved in metabolic processes like photosynthesis, sulfate reduction, respiration, and nitrogen fixation. Iron is also crucial for electron carrier production in photosystems I and II (). However, since plants typically absorb iron from the soil in the form of Fe2+, deficiency symptoms occur when a significant amount of iron remains in the insoluble Fe3+ form (). This deficiency not only leads to chlorosis but also decreases the activity of certain enzymes like catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and peroxidase, which contain heme groups as prosthetic groups essential for plant metabolism (). Antioxidant enzymes like catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and peroxidase play a protective role against reactive oxygen species (ROS) damage. These enzymes are present in different parts of the cell and are responsible for transforming O2- into H2O2 and O2 as part of the detoxification process (). Iron's low solubility in oxidized form in aerobic conditions makes it the third most limiting nutrient for plant metabolism and growth (). Therefore, efforts should be made to mitigate iron stress (toxicity or deficiency) to avoid nutritional disorders in plants.
The utilization of chelated fertilizers, particularly for iron supplementation, can effectively address iron deficiency issues in basic soils and similar conditions. However, chelated fertilizers can be expensive and may not be suitable for all plants. Conversely, the excessive application of chemical fertilizers can cause imbalances in soil minerals, degrade soil fertility and texture, and negatively impact the ecosystem (). Another potential solution is the use of bio-fertilizers, but their large-scale production is challenging, and their effectiveness is dependent on pH and temperature conditions. In this regard, nanotechnology offers a promising approach, with iron oxide nanoparticles like Fe2O3 being a potential solution for iron deficiency in plants ().
Nanoparticles (NPs) have diverse applications in agriculture, including genetic modification of plants, promoting growth and development, and regulating the release of agrochemicals (). NPs enable precise delivery and regulated release of agrochemicals and essential macromolecules necessary for plant growth and development, promoting efficient utilization and reduced environmental impact (). Nowadays, there is an increased interest in the utilization of metal-based NPs, including Fe2O3 NPs, in agriculture. Ferric oxide NPs are safe and environmentally friendly materials that can positively influence the biochemical composition and growth of plants. They enhance plant growth, promote the levels of medicinal and nutritional properties in plants, facilitate nutrient uptake, and increase the content of essential elements in plants through improved nutrient absorption and increased photosynthesis, which is an important metabolic pathway under the influence of iron NPs (). demonstrated the effectiveness of iron NPs applied during the flowering stage on the yield and constituents of essential oil of peppermint (Mentha × piperita L). Similarly, investigated the effects of foliar spraying of salicylic acid and Fe2O3 NPs on Trachyspermum ammi (L.) Sprague at two stages (7-leaf and flowering stages) and found that the combination of NPs and salicylic acid could enhance the essential oil content. Due to their small size, Fe2O3 NPs can enter plant cells via iron channels, aquaporins, or binding to carrier proteins (). Fe2O3 NPs have shown positive effects on antioxidant enzyme activity in Triticum aestivum L., as well as enhanced antioxidant activity (). In the case of D. kotschyi, Fe2O3 NPs at the level of 75 mg L−1 after 24 h treatment have been observed to stimulate the production of phenolic compounds in the hairy roots (). Similarly, in Hyoscyamus reticulatus L., treatment with Fe2O3 NPs resulted in a substantial increase in the production of scopolamine and hyoscyamine compared with controls ().
D. kotschyi, classified as a vulnerable species in Iran according to the IUCN grouping criteria (), is facing challenges due to overcollection from its natural habitats. To address this issue, there is an increasing inclination towards cultivating this plant within agricultural systems. However, there has been relatively limited research and development focused on issues in cultivation of this species. Particularly, there is no information regarding the effects of both nano and bulk forms of iron oxide, which belong to the new generation of elicitors, on the plant growth and essential oil composition of D. kotschyi. Considering that both nano and bulk forms of iron oxide are extensively used in various industries, this research was aimed to investigate their impact on the growth, yield, total phenolic and flavonoid content, essential oil production, and antioxidant capacity of D. kotschyi.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Fe2O3 NPs characterization
Fe2O3 NPs obtained from Nanosany Company, Ltd., Iran, were subjected to characterization using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Figure 1). The Zetasizer Nano ZS instrument was used to determine the zeta potential and diameter values of the Fe2O3 (S1).
Figure 1
2.2 Plant material and greenhouse experiments
For the greenhouse experiments, D. kotschyi seeds were acquired from Company of Pakan Bazr in Isfahan, Iran. The seeds underwent surface sterilization with 2% NaOCl and were rinsed with distilled water. Subsequently, the sterilized seeds were sown in seedling trays containing autoclaved coco peat for germination with two seeds per cell, in November 2022. Seedling trays were placed in research greenhouses of the Horticultural Science Department, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Lorestan Province, Iran. Seedlings with 6-8 leaves were transplanted into individual pots (10 cm in diameter and 12 cm in height). The substrate used for the pots was prepared by combining sand, agricultural soil, and manure (3:1:1). The results of analysis of pot soil can be found in Supplementary Table S2. Foliar application of Fe2O3 included: control (sprayed with distilled water), 50 mg L-1 bulk Fe2O3, 100 mg L-1 bulk Fe2O3, 200 mg L-1 bulk Fe2O3, 50 mg L-1 Fe2O3 NPs, 100 mg L-1 Fe2O3 NPs, and 200 mg L-1 Fe2O3 NPs. The experiment was conducted following a completely randomized design (CRD) with 3 replications (5 pots per each replication). The proper concentration range of foliar spray was selected based on both a comprehensive literature survey and a pre-experiment (; ; ) and a pilot experimental study. The applications were performed every two weeks until harvesting, resulting in a total of six sprays. The first spray was administered on March 7th 2023, and the final spray was conducted on May 16th 2023. During the entire five-months period of plant phenology, effective measures were implemented to control weeds, pests, and diseases in the greenhouse. The greenhouse itself was oriented in a north-south direction. The average temperatures during the night and day were maintained at around 20 and 30°C, respectively. The relative humidity levels ranged from 55 to 85%. Inside the greenhouse, the photosynthetically active photon flux density was approximately 600 ± 100 μmol quanta m–2 s–1.
2.3 Growth parameters
At the full flowering stage of growth, various growth parameters were measured, including height of plant (cm), diameter of stem (mm), length of internode (mm), length and width of leaf (mm), and length of inflorescence (cm). Then, plants were harvested and the fresh weight of aerial parts was measured. Plant aerial parts were oven-dried at 50°C for determination of dry weight. Finally, leaves were separated from stems and dry weights of stem, dry weights of leaf, as well as leaf/stem ratio were recorded.
2.4 Photosynthetic pigments and relative water content
To measure the contents of carotenoids, chlorophyll b, and chlorophyll a, the method was employed. Fresh frozen leaf samples weighing 0.25 g were extracted in a 10 mL solution of 80% acetone. The obtained extract was subsequently centrifuged for 15 min at 10,000 rpm. The absorbance of the resulting supernatant was recorded at wavelengths of 663, 645, and 470 nm.
The relative water content (RWC) of leaf samples was assessed using the method. Ten fully expanded leaves were collected and promptly weighed to assess the fresh weight (FW). The selected leaves were then immersed in distilled water for 24 h at a temperature of 25°C to attain their saturated weight (SW). After the absorption period, the leaf samples were dried for 48 h at 85°C to measure the dry weight (DW). The RWC was measured according to the formula provided and repeated three times.
2.5 Total phenols and flavonoids content and antioxidant activity
To prepare the herbal extract, 100 mg samples from each treatment were separately mixed with 2 mL of an 80% methanol solution and left to incubate in a dark room for 16 h. Following centrifugation for 20 min at 14,000 × g, the clarified supernatant was subsequently filtered.
The content of total phenolics was measured using the Folin-Ciocalteau reagent (). In brief, a 0.4 mL diluted extract of the leaf was combined with 1.6 mL of sodium carbonate solution and 2 mL of the Folin-Ciocalteau reagent. Following incubation at room temperature for 30 min, the absorbance was read at 760 nm. The content of total phenolics was expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per g dry weight of plant (mg GAE/g DW).
To evaluate the flavonoid content, the AlCl3 colorimetric method was employed (). Briefly, 2 mL of the diluted extract was mixed with 2% aluminum chloride (2 mL) and stored for 15 min at room temperature. The resulting mixture was then read for absorbance at 415 nm. The total content of flavonoid was expressed as mg of rutin per g of plant dry weight (mg rutin/g DW).
The antioxidant activity of extracts was measured by FRAP assay according to . In test tubes, 0.02 mL of the extract and 0.18 mL of the FRAP reagent were combined and incubated for 30 min at 30°C. The absorbance was read at 593 nm by using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, model UV-1700, Japan).
2.6 Fe concentration
The concentration of Fe was measured according to the method described by with slight modifications. Approximately 1 g of the sample was subjected to ashing in a muffle furnace at a temperature of 500°C for 3 h. After the sample had cooled down, the resulting ash was dissolved in 10 mL of 2-normal hydrochloric acid and transferred to a 50 mL flask. The concentration of Fe was then determined using Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (model Agilent 240FS AA, USA). The nutrient element concentration was expressed as mg kg-1 of plant dry weight (DW).
2.7 Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity
A 0.5 g of fresh leaves was powdered in 5 mL of a phosphate buffer (0.05 M, pH 7.8) containing 1% PVP and 1mM EDTA. The resulting mixture was then centrifuged at 12,000×g (20 min, 4°C). The supernatant was collected for the measuring ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activity. The activity of PAL was measured using a modified assay based on a method described by . In brief, the reaction mixture comprised 1 mM L-phenylalanine, the enzyme extract, and 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8) (total volume of 1.2 mL). The reaction proceeded for 30 to 60 min at 30°C and was stopped by adding 0.5 mL of 4N HCl. After vortexing with 2 mL of toluene, the mixture underwent centrifugation for 5 min at 750 g. The absorbance of the cinnamic acid retrieved in the toluene phase was read at 290 nm.
2.8 Enzymatic antioxidants activity
The activity of APX was assessed according to the method. The enzyme extract was combined with a reaction mixture consisting of ascorbic acid (AA) (0.5 mM), H2O2 (0.1 mM), EDTA (0.1 mM), and phosphate-potassium buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0). The absorbance was read at 290 nm.
For the extraction of peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT), leaf samples (0.5 g fresh leaves) were extracted with 2 mL of Tris buffer (0.1 mol/L, pH 8) consisting of 1 mM EDTA and 0.05 g PVP. The mixture was centrifuged at 13,000 g (15 min at 4°C). A 0.05 mL of the supernatant was added to 0.4 mL of extraction buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0) containing 0.4 ml H2O2 (12.5 mM). The activity of CAT was monitored every 10 sec for 2 min at 240 nm ().
The activity of POD was measured by observing the oxidation of guaiacol catalyzed by peroxidase enzyme (). The reaction mixture contained 50 µL of 30% H2O2, 50 µL of crude extract, and 50 µL of 0.05 M guaiacol in 1200 µL of phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0). The change in absorbance was recorded at 470 nm every 10 sec.
2.9 Hydrogen peroxide
The level of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was measured according to the method of . Fresh leaves weighing 0.5 g were powdered with 5 mL of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) (0.1% w/v). After centrifugation for 15 min at 10,000 g, 0.5 mL of the resulting supernatant was combined with 0.5 mL of potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 2 mL of potassium iodide. The absorbance of samples was read at 390 nm.
2.10 Essential oil isolation
A quantity of 25 g of dried leaves was individually subjected to hydrodistillation utilizing a Clevenger apparatus for a period of 3 h. The essential oil obtained was collected in a glass vial. The content of essential oil was measured and expressed as mg per 100 g of dry plant (w/w). The yield of essential oil was obtained by multiplying of the content of essential oil with the dry weight of the aerial parts (g plant-1) ().
2.11 Essential oil analysis
The separation of essential oil constituents was achieved using GC-MS with a capillary column of BP-5 fused-silica. The carrier gas was helium, with the temperature of injector and interface set at 280 and 260°C, respectively. The electron impact ionization was 70 eV, and the split ratio was 1/20. The mass spectrum was recorded in the range of 35–450 amu. The oven temperature was increased from 55 to 285°C at a rate of 4°C per min and for 15 min held isothermally ().
GC-FID analysis was performed using a Thermoquest Finnigan equipped with a BP-5 capillary column (30 m length, 0.22 mm inner diameter, and 0.25 μm film thickness) and FID detector. The oven temperature was set as same as the GC-MS analysis. The temperatures of detector and injector were maintained at 300 and 250°C, respectively. Helium was utilized as the carrier gas (flow rate of 1 mL/min). Retention indices (RI) of essential oil components were measured using a n-alkanes series (C6-C40) injected into the GC system. The identification of constituents was performed by (1) mass spectra comparison with an internal library (WILEY 275 and NIST 17), (2) the calculated RI compared with those reported in Adams book, and (3) the retention time compared with those of available standards ()
2.12 Data analysis
The data obtained were analyzed using SAS statistical software based on the experimental design employed in the study. After analysis of variance (ANOVA), mean comparison between all treatments was done using the LSD test at a 0.05% significance level.
3 Results
3.1 Biomass and yield attributes
The findings of the study revealed significant effects of foliar spraying with Fe2O3 NPs treatment on various growth parameters of D. kotschyi. The plant height, inflorescence length, leaf length, stem diameter, internode length, leaf dry weight, stem dry weight, and ratio of leaf/stem were all influenced by the application of Fe2O3 (Supplementary Table S3). The highest plant height was observed with the application of 200 mg L-1 of Fe2O3 NPs, resulting in a 26.5% increase compared with control plants. Additionally, plants sprayed with 100 mg L-1 of bulk Fe2O3 showed a 9.036% increase in plant height compared with the control. The inflorescence length was elongated by the application of Fe2O3 NPs up to the level of 100 mg L-1, and bulk Fe2O3 up to 50 mg L-1. However, higher concentrations had a negative impact on the inflorescence length. The length of leaves showed an increase with the foliar spraying of both nano and bulk forms of Fe2O3, with the highest value recorded at a concentration of 200 mg L-1 of Fe2O3 NPs (25.07 mm). The maximum stem diameter was observed with the application of 50 mg L-1 of Fe2O3 NPs, while different concentrations of bulk Fe2O3 did not significantly affect stem diameter. Internode length was increased by the application of Fe2O3 NPs up to the level of 200 mg L-1, and bulk Fe2O3 up to 100 mg L-1. The highest increase in internode length (67.63% compared with the control) was obtained with the application of 200 mg L-1 of Fe2O3 NPs. Regarding biomass, the foliar spray of 100 and/or 200 mg L-1 of Fe2O3 NPs led to the highest dry weight of leaf (3.39 g), while the highest dry weight of stem was observed in plants sprayed with 50 and/or 200 mg L-1 of bulk Fe2O3 (2.22 and 2.46 g, respectively). The highest leaf/stem ratio was recorded by the application of Fe2O3 NPs at the level of 100 mg L-1, followed by the level of 200 mg L-1 (2.87 and 1.78, respectively) (Table 1).
Table 1
| Fe2O3 Application (mg L-1) | Plant height (cm) | Inflorescence length (cm) | Leaf length (mm) | Stem diameter (mm) | Internode length (mm) | Leaf dry weight (g) | Stem dry weight (g) | Leaf/Stem ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 41.5d | 8.9d | 19.9d | 1.74bc | 22e | 2.3b | 1.6bc | 1.4bc |
| Nano 50 | 40.5d | 10.2cd | 21.6cd | 2.3a | 28.8cd | 1.4c | 0.9d | 1.1cd |
| Nano 100 | 42.5cd | 14.6ab | 24.1ab | 1.99ab | 32.8b | 3.4a | 1.2cd | 2.9a |
| Nano 200 | 52.5a | 10.8c | 25.1a | 1.9bc | 37a | 3.4a | 1.9ab | 1.9b |
| Bulk 50 | 36e | 15.5a | 23.1abc | 1.91b | 29.7c | 2.3b | 2.2a | 1.1d |
| Bulk 100 | 45.3b | 13.2b | 22.4bc | 1.83bc | 34b | 2.4b | 1.6bc | 1.5bc |
| Bulk 200 | 44.5bc | 6.3e | 22.4bc | 1.6c | 27.7d | 2.5b | 2.5a | 1d |
Mean comparison of the effects of foliar application of Fe2O3NPs and bulk Fe2O3 on biomass and yield attributes of D. kotschyi.
Means with the same letters in each column do not have a significant difference at the 1% probability level based on the Duncan test.
3.2 RWC and photosynthetic pigments
The analysis of variance (Supplementary Table S4) revealed a significant effect of foliar application of Fe2O3 on the RWC, carotenoid, total chlorophyll, chlorophyll b, and chlorophyll a levels in D. kotschyi (p ≤ 0.01). The spray of bulk Fe2O3 had a positive impact on leaf RWC, with the highest value observed at a concentration of 200 mg L-1 (86.8%). In contrast, there was no significant difference in leaf RWC with any of the Fe2O3 NPs concentrations. Foliar application of Fe2O3 NPs at a concentration of 200 mg L−1 resulted in increased contents of total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, and carotenoids. However, the highest values of total chlorophyll and chlorophyll a were observed in plants exposed to 100 mg L−1 of bulk Fe2O3, which had no significant difference with treatments of 200 mg L-1 of Fe2O3 NPs as well as all other concentrations of bulk Fe2O3. The highest content of carotenoids was obtained with the application of 200 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs and all concentrations of bulk Fe2O3 (Table 2).
Table 2
| Fe2O3 Application (mg L-1) | Relative water content (%) | Chlorophyll a (mg g-1 FW) | Chlorophyll b (mg g-1 FW) | Total chlorophyll (mg g-1 FW) | Carotenoid (mg g-1 FW) | Total phenol (mg GAE g-1 DW) | Flavonoids (mg rutin g-1 DW) | FRAP assay (µmol Fe+2 g-1 DW) | Fe concentration (mg g-1 DW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 72.4c | 0.8b | 0.24cd | 1.08b | 8 b | 0.29a | 48.5b | 2.6c | 88d |
| Nano 50 | 71.8c | 0.9b | 0.26c | 1.02b | 7.4b | 0.27cd | 55a | 4a | 153c |
| Nano 100 | 74c | 0.7c | 0.20d | 0.94b | 7b | 0.275c | 43.8c | 2.6c | 258.1b |
| Nano 200 | 75.4c | 1.02a | 0.26c | 1.37a | 10.5a | 0.28ab | 43.2c | 2.5c | 477.1a |
| Bulk 50 | 76c | 1a | 0.32b | 1.30a | 9.3a | 0.26e | 53.5a | 3.3b | 98.1d |
| Bulk 100 | 81.4b | 1.1a | 0.37a | 1.43a | 10.3a | 0.265ed | 33.2e | 3.4b | 101.5d |
| Bulk 200 | 86.8a | 1.1a | 0.23cd | 1.41a | 10 a | 0.276bc | 37.1d | 3.7ab | 170.5c |
Mean comparison of the effects of foliar application of Fe2O3NPs and bulk Fe2O3 on biochemical traits and Fe concentration of D. kotschyi.
Means with the same letters in each column do not have a significant difference at the 1% probability level based on the Duncan test.
3.3 Total phenolic and flavonoid contents and antioxidant capacity
The application of Fe2O3, whether in nano or bulk form, had a significant impact on the contents of total phenolics and flavonoids, as well as non-enzymatic antioxidant activity in the leaves of D. kotschyi (p ≤ 0.01) (Supplementary Table S2). In terms of total phenolics, the foliar application of Fe2O3 in both nano and bulk forms (except for 200 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs) resulted in a significant decrease in level compared with the control. However, spraying with 50 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 in both forms resulted in a significant increase in the total flavonoids content of the samples compared with the control. Conversely, higher concentrations of Fe2O3 led to a significant decrease in the total flavonoids content. The maximum non-enzymatic antioxidant activity was observed with the application of 50 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs (3.97 μmol Fe2+ g-1 DW) and/or 200 mg L−1 of bulk Fe2O3 (3.71 μmol Fe2+ g-1 DW) (Table 2).
3.4 Fe concentration
The foliar spraying of Fe2O3 had a significant influence (p ≤ 0.01) on the Fe content in the leaves of D. kotschyi, as indicated in Supplementary Table S2. The results revealed that increasing concentrations of Fe2O3 NPs were associated with an increase of the Fe content of the leaves. The highest Fe content was observed in plants sprayed with Fe2O3 NPs at the level of 200 mg L−1, reaching a value of 477.10 mg g-1 DW. Furthermore, the application of 200 mg L−1 of bulk Fe2O3 also resulted in an increase of the Fe content compared with the control.
3.5 PAL activity
The current investigation revealed a significant effect (p ≤ 0.01) of Fe2O3 on the activity of the PAL enzyme, as indicated in Supplementary Table S5. The foliar spraying of bulk Fe2O3 significantly increased PAL activity in the leaf samples. The highest PAL activity was obtained in the leaves sprayed with 200 mg L−1 of bulk Fe2O3, reaching a value of 29.711 μg Cin min-1g-1 FW. On the other hand, the foliar spray of Fe2O3 NPs only increased PAL activity at the 200 mg L−1 treatment (Figure 2A).
Figure 2
3.6 Antioxidant enzymes activity and H2O2 content
The foliar application of Fe2O3 had a significant impact (p ≤ 0.01) on the activity of antioxidant enzymes involved in free radical scavenging, namely APX, CAT, and POD, as well as the H2O2 content. APX activity significantly increased when plants were exposed to concentrations of 100 and/or 200 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs, with the highest boost observed at the level of 200 mg L−1, which was 6.33 times higher than the control. On the other hand, the application of bulk Fe2O3 led to increase APX activity at the levels of 100 and/or 200 mg L−1 (Figure 2B). Both nano and bulk forms of Fe2O3 led to an increase in CAT activity in the leaves. The highest CAT activity was obtained in plants sprayed with 200 mg L−1 of bulk Fe2O3 (12.6904 μmol min−1 g−1 FW), while the lowest activity was found in untreated plants (0.9259 μmol min−1 g−1 FW) (Figure 2C). The concentration of Fe2O3 NPs showed a linear induction of POD activity. However, significant increases in POD activity were obtained with the application of higher concentrations of bulk Fe2O3 (100 and/or 200 mg L−1). The highest POD activity was recorded at the concentrations of 100 and/or 200 mg L−1 of bulk Fe2O3, as well as 200 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs (Figure 2D). Foliar application of both nano and bulk forms of Fe2O3 induced the accumulation of H2O2 in plant leaves. The highest H2O2 content was obtained in plants sprayed with 200 mg L−1 of bulk Fe2O3, although there was no significant difference compared with 50 mg L−1 of bulk Fe2O3, as well as 100 and/or 200 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs (Figure 2E).
3.7 Essential oil content and yield
The analysis of variance demonstrated significant effects (p ≤ 0.01) of foliar application of Fe2O3 on the content and yield of D. kotschyi essential oil. The application of 50 mg L−1 of both nano and bulk forms of Fe2O3, as well as 100 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs, led to a significant enhancement in the essential oil content. The highest percentage of essential oils (2.138%) was recorded with foliar application of 50 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs, which showed no significant difference compared with 100 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs and 50 mg L−1 of bulk Fe2O3 treatments. However, as the concentration of NPs and bulk forms of Fe2O3 increased, the essential oil content declined. (Figure 3A). Furthermore, the essential oil yield was significantly increased in plants treated with Fe2O3 NPs at the level of 50 mg L−1 compared with the control plants. The highest essential oil yield (0.0917 g/plant) was obtained from D. kotschyi plants treated with 50 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs, which showed no significant difference compared with the 100 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs treatment. However, higher levels of Fe2O3 NPs resulted in a decline in the essential oil yield. Different concentrations of bulk Fe2O3 did not make any significant change in the essential oil yield compared with the control (Figure 3B).
Figure 3
3.8 Essential oil composition
The GC-MS and GC-FID analysis of D. kotschyi essential oil resulted in the identification of 22 constituents. Among these, the main components were found to be geranial (up to 34.005%) and neral (up to 23.18%), which are isomers of citral. Additionally, remarkable amounts of geranyl acetate (up to 10.708%), methyl geranate (up to 7.347%), δ3-carene (up to 6.52%), and α-pinene (up to 5.34%) were also present in the essential oil. Notably, the variance analysis revealed that the foliar spraying of Fe2O3 had a significant influence on various components of the essential oil, including δ3-carene, cis-sabinene hydrate, α-campholenal, E-2,6-nonadien-1-ol, cis-verbenol, iso-pulegone, 1,3,4-trimethyl-3-cyclohexenyl-1-carboxaldehyde, neral, geranial, methyl geranate, geranyl acetate, (E)-caryophyllene, aromandendrene, and β-gurjunene (Supplementary Table S6).
The mean comparison of the effect of Fe2O3 foliar spraying on the essential oil components showed that the spraying of 50 mg L-1 of Fe2O3 NPs significantly increased the level of geranial, the most important component of the essential oil, by 10.08% compared with the control. The control plants exhibited the highest percentage of neral (23.18%), while the lowest value was obtained in the treatment with 200 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs (19.346%). However, no significant difference was noticed between the control and other plants treated with both nano and bulk forms of Fe2O3 in terms of neral percentage. The highest percentage of geranyl acetate was obtained with foliar spraying of Fe2O3 NPs at the level of 100 mg L−1, but it did not significantly differ from 50 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs, 200 mg L−1 of bulk Fe2O3, and control treatments. The content of δ3-carene was significantly increased with the foliar application of 200 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs, as well as 50 and/or 100 mg L−1 of bulk Fe2O3 compared with the control. The highest percentage of δ3-carene was obtained in plants sprayed with Fe2O3 NPs at the level of 200 mg L−1, which was 68.6% higher than the control. The spraying of 50 and/or 100 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs significantly decreased the percentage of methyl geranate compared with the control, with the highest value observed in 50 mg L−1 of bulk Fe2O3. The highest percentage of linalool and iso-pulegone (0.974 and 0.55%, respectively) was observed with the application of 200 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs. On the other hand, foliar spraying of Fe2O3 NPs led to a significant decline in the level of 1,3,4-trimethyl-3-cyclohexenyl-1-carboxaldehyde, with the lowest percentage of this compound obtained with the highest level of Fe2O3 NPs. (E)-Caryophyllene was only detected in 50 and/or 100 mg L−1 of Fe2O3 NPs (Table 3).
Table 3
| NO | Constituents | RIІ | LIT RIІІ | Treatments | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| control | Nano 50 | Nano 100 | Nano 200 | Bulk 50 | Bulk 100 | Bulk 200 | ||||
| 1 | α-Pinene | 924 | 931 | 5.4a | 4.6a | 4.7a | 5a | 5.3a | 5a | 4.7a |
| 2 | Camphene | 941 | 943 | 0.1a | 0.07a | 0.07a | 0.06a | 0.08a | 0.07a | 0.1a |
| 3 | Sabinene | 964 | 964 | 0.9a | 0.8a | 0.8a | 0.9a | 0.9a | 1 a | 0.9a |
| 4 | β-Myrcene | 978 | 979 | 2.5a | 2a | 1.9a | 2.2a | 2.5a | 2.5a | 2.3a |
| 5 | α-Phellandrene | 996 | 997 | 0.5a | 0.4a | 0.5a | 0.3a | 0.5a | 0.4a | 0.3a |
| 6 | δ3-Carene | 1020 | 1008 | 6.5cd | 6.9c | 6.4cd | 11a | 8.6b | 9.5b | 5.8d |
| 7 | cis-Sabinene hydrate | 1063 | 1068 | 0.5abc | 0.27d | 0.32cd | 0.49ab | 0.49ab | 0.38bcd | 0.55a |
| 8 | Terpinolene | 1076 | 1078 | 0.4a | 0.32a | 0.4a | 0.38a | 0.38a | 0.32a | 0.4a |
| 9 | Linalool | 1094. | 1095 | 1.2ab | 1.12ab | 1ab | 0.98b | 1.3a | 1.03ab | 1.05ab |
| 10 | α-Campholenal | 1121 | 1120 | 0.6ab | 0.56abc | 0.56abc | 0.41c | 0.59ab | 0.46bc | 0.7a |
| 11 | E-2,6-Nonadien-1-ol | 1136 | 1143 | 0.5ab | 0.32d | 0.4bc | 0.34cd | 0.46ab | 0.4bc | 0.5a |
| 12 | cis-Verbenol | 1143 | 1148 | 0.3ab | 0.22bc | 0.29ab | 0.16c | 0.3ab | 0.25abc | 0.35a |
| 13 | iso-Pulegone | 1153 | 1157 | 1.2a | 0.81b | 0.97ab | 0.55c | 1.2a | 0.98ab | 1.05a |
| 14 | 1,3,4-Trimethyl-3-cyclohexenyl-1- carboxaldehyde | 1173 | 1171 | 2.1a | 1.36d | 1.57cd | 0.97e | 1.99ab | 1.76abc | 1.68bcd |
| 15 | γ-Terpineol | 1196 | 1185 | 0.6 ab | 0.54b | 0.58ab | 0.71a | 0.71a | 0.6ab | 0.56ab |
| 16 | Neral | 1239 | 1240 | 23.2a | 22.73a | 22.02a | 19.35b | 21.77a | 22.65a | 22.81a |
| 17 | Geranial | 1274 | 1264 | 34 bc | 37.44a | 36.36ab | 36.47ab | 33.39c | 34.73abc | 34.84abc |
| 18 | Methyl geranate | 1318 | 1319 | 7.4ab | 5.57c | 5.28c | 6.27bc | 8.78a | 7abc | 7.52ab |
| 19 | Geranyl acetate | 1377 | 1360 | 10.7ab | 12.19ab | 13.5a | 9.37b | 9.01b | 8.93b | 12.32ab |
| 20 | (E)-Caryophyllene | 1411 | 1417 | – | 0.021b | 0.04a | – | – | – | – |
| 21 | Aromandendrene | 1449 | 1439 | 0.06abc | 0.11a | 0.10ab | – | 0.04c | 0.06bc | 0.08a |
| 22 | β-Gurjunene | 1470 | 1463 | 0.6cd | 0.89ab | 1.1a | 0.72bc | 0.48d | 0.71bc | 0.56cd |
| Total identified (%) | 99.041 | 99.080 | 98.750 | 96.657 | 98.66 | 98.71 | 98.97 | |||
Mean comparison of the effects of foliar application of Fe2O3NPs and bulk Fe2O3 on D. kotschyi essential oil chemical composition.
Means with the same letters in each row do not have a significant difference at the 1% probability level based on the Duncan test. І RI, linear retention indices on HP-5 column column, experimentally determined using homologue series of n-alkanes. ІІ LIT RI, Relative retention indices taken from Adams.
3.9 Fe2O3 NPs characteristics
The morphological characterization of Fe2O3 NPs synthesized for this study is detailed in Figure 1 and Supplementary Table S1. TEM analyses, shown in Figures 1A, B, along with SEM analysis (Figure 1C), revealed that the Fe2O3 NPs predominantly exhibited a spherical morphology. These NPs were selected for their stability, nanoscale size, and high purity. Further experimentation investigated the interaction of Fe2O3 NPs with D. kotschyi plants, focusing on NPs uptake and intracellular translocation within the leaf structures. SEM analysis, illustrated in Figure 4, confirmed the assimilation and systemic distribution of the NPs. Figure 4 provides a comparative analysis of foliar tissues from plants treated with a 200 mg L-1 concentration of Fe2O3 NPs versus an untreated control group. Specifically, segments C, D, and E of Figure 4 highlight the deposition of NPs on the surfaces of stomatal cells, offering insights into the dynamics of NPs-plant interactions.
Figure 4
Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) analysis determined the hydrodynamic size of the Fe2O3 NPs to be 203.9 nm, with a Polydispersity Index (PDI) of 0.454, indicating a relatively broad distribution of particle sizes. Zeta potential analysis revealed three distinct peaks: a primary peak at 38.5 mV, representing 75% of the sample and indicating a predominant population of positively charged NPs; a second peak at -67.5 mV, covering 4.3% of the sample; and a third peak at -7.3 mV, covering 3.2% of the sample, reflecting smaller populations of negatively charged NPs (Figure 1D).
4 Discussion
Fe2O3 NPs are known for their environmental friendliness and biocompatibility, largely due to their specific physicochemical properties, including biodegradability in natural environments. Research shows that Fe2O3 NPs, at commonly used concentrations, decompose into iron ions that are absorbed by plants and microorganisms, posing minimal environmental risks (; ). Additionally, recent studies, especially those conducted since 2020, have explored the potential long-term effects of Fe2O3 NPs and found that, when applied properly, these particles present minimal environmental concerns (; ).
The current study showed an increase in the biomass and yield attributes of D. kotschyi through the foliar application of both nano and bulk forms of Fe2O3 (Table 1). Previous studies have also reported growth and biomass enhancement with the application of Fe2O3 in Oryza sativa L (), Helianthus annuus L (). and M. × piperita (). Due to the crucial role of iron in the plant photosynthesis, chlorophyll structure, and transcriptional modification, the optimal concentration of Fe2O3 improves photosynthesis and the biosynthesis of primary metabolites, which contribute to the growth-promoting effects of these supplements (). In a study conducted by , it was demonstrated that the application of Fe2O3 NPs increased the metabolism, cell expansions, auxin biosynthesis, and biochemical activities of T. aestivum, leading to an increase in biomass and yield. Similarly, reported that foliar spraying of Fe NPs improved the biomass of in vitro cultures of Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) Bertoni. In our present study, both the bulk and nano forms of Fe2O3 supplements were found to be growth stimulants, enhancing the yield attributes of D. kotschyi. Notably, the nano form exhibited a greater stimulating effect on plant growth, biomass, and biofortification of tissues compared with the bulk form. This can be attributed to the unique physicochemical characteristics of nano-compounds (). The different responses observed following the application of bulk or nano compounds can be attributed to variations in uptake and assimilation mechanisms, as well as the physicochemical traits of these products. Research has demonstrated that trace amounts of selenium (Se) can promote plant growth, delay senescence, and help regulation of water content under drought conditions. This is achieved by lowering ROS levels and boosting the activity of antioxidant enzymes (; ). Nano-compounds, due to their unique physicochemical characteristics like size, surface area, purity, and stability, can infiltrate the plant system through various routes including stomata and cracks on the leaf surface. Upon entering the plant, NPs can move across the plant tissues via bulk flow, diffusion, and phloem loading (). The interaction between NPs and biomolecules may elicit different reactions in exposed plants compared with their bulk counterparts, further highlighting the importance of their physicochemical properties (; ; ). Our findings align with previous studies in Capsicum annuum L (), Oenothera biennis L (), Zea mays L (). and Nicotiana benthamiana Domin ().
The application of Fe2O3 in its bulk form resulted in an increase in the RWC of leaves. There are several factors that could explain the changes in plant water status following the spraying of Fe2O3. One possible reason is the structural pattern and size/density of pores in the root system, which can affect root porosity (). Additionally, the regulation of aquaporin expression, which influences root hydraulic conductivity and water permeability, may play a role (). Fe2O3 application may also lead to the elicitation of antioxidant constituents and osmolytes in cells, enhancing their ability to scavenge ROS, thereby improving membrane stability and water uptake (). Similar changes in leaf water status have been reported in various plant species following exposure to Fe sources, including Melissa officinalis L (), Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm. (), and Phaseolus vulgaris L (). Previous research has recorded Se-induced changes in various photosynthesis-related traits across different plant species, such as Solanum tuberosum L (). and Ocimum basilicum L ().
The application of 200 mg L-1 of Fe2O3 NPs and all concentrations of bulk Fe2O3 resulted in an increase in photosynthetic pigments. This could be attributed to the significant role of Fe in chlorophyll biosynthesis and chloroplast functions (). According to , the application of Fe2O3 NPs also enhances chlorophyll level of plant by up-regulating photosynthetic marker genes. Furthermore, Fe has a catalytic effect on light-activated enzymes in leaves, potentially increasing the efficiency of energy capture of the reaction center of PSII. This leads to an increase in the level of photosynthetic pigments and overall photosynthetic performance (). Consequently, foliar spraying of Fe2O3 enhances plant growth and yield by promoting nutrient accumulation, improving water status, and enhancing photosynthesis (). Similar results regarding chlorophyll levels have been observed in Medicago sativa L (). and Arachis hypogaea L (). when exposed to Fe NPs.
Flavonoids possess antioxidant properties and play a crucial role in regulating enzymatic activity and the production of primary metabolites. The hydroxyl groups present in the structure of flavonoids enable them to function as scavengers of free radicals (). The findings of the current study demonstrate the beneficial influence of Fe2O3 on the flavonoid content and antioxidant capacity of D. kotschyi. The application of Fe2O3 NPs at the level of 50 mg L−1 yielded the highest values in terms of flavonoids content and antioxidant activity. A similar observation was made by , who noted an increase in the antioxidant capacity of O. biennis following the application of Fe2O3 NPs. also reported that the use of high levels of iron chelates resulted in an enhancement of flavonoids content in Carthamus tinctorius L. Additionally, reported positive effects on the phenol and flavonoid levels, as well as the antioxidant capacity of C. annuum seedlings when exposed to Fe2O3 NPs through foliar application. also showed that applying foliar Se NPs to Dracocephalum moldavica L. led to increased levels of phenolic compounds and enhanced ROS scavenging. Se affects the pathways involved in phenolic production, notably the shikimic acid pathway, as discussed by . The higher reactivity of nanomaterials, specifically Fe2O3 NPs, appears to have a significant impact on enzyme activity and antioxidant capacity. It has been observed that NPs can act as catalysts and induce intracellular chemical alterations (). The application of iron NPs has been shown to increase the flavonoid levels in D. kotschyi by promoting the expression of genes involved in the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway (). PAL activity in the shikimate pathway triggers the biosynthesis of phenolic metabolites and their precursors in plants. Iron is an essential nutrient for plants as it is necessary for biological redox systems and is an indispensable component of enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of both primary and secondary plant metabolites. Co-factors such as 2-oxoglutarate, Fe2+, and ascorbate are required for the catalysis of a series of oxidation reactions in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway by enzymes like flavones synthase I, flavonol synthase, flavanone 3-hydroxylase, and anthocyanidin synthase/leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (). In this study, it was found that the use of Fe2O3 bulk supplement was more effective than Fe2O3 NPs in increasing PAL activity. The highest activity of PAL was observed at a level of 200 mg L−1 of bulk Fe2O3. However, it should be noted that changes in PAL activity induced by elicitors do not always correspond to changes in the accumulation of phenolic and flavonoid compounds (). A previous study on D. kotschyi demonstrated that the expression of genes involved in PAL and rosmarinic acid synthase increased in response to treatment with Fe NPs (). Similarly, in another study on O. basilicum, exposure to Fe2O3 NPs significantly doubled the activity of PAL in the leaves ().
The excessive generation of ROS such as ˙O2−, ˙OH, and H2O2, caused by abiotic factors, leads to oxidative stress. Even under optimal conditions, various metabolic processes in biological systems generate ROS (). H2O2, produced internally through physiological and pathological processes, is responsible for over 200 genotoxic effects (). It directly and indirectly damages DNA by generating hydroxyl radicals through a Fenton-type reaction, resulting in oxidative DNA damage, DNA single-strand breaks, gene mutations, and chromosomal aberrations (). To counteract the harmful effects of ROS, antioxidant enzymes like APX, CAT, and POX play a significant role in regulating ROS levels (; ). In this study, both nano and bulk Fe2O3 supplements induced the production of H2O2 and subsequently enhanced the activity of enzymatic antioxidants (CAT, APX, and POD) in D. kotschyi. This increased antioxidant enzyme activity can help to detoxify H2O2 and improve the plant's tolerance to oxidative stress (). Upon evaluating the functions of all the enzymes examined, it becomes clear that the accumulation of Fe triggers robust antioxidant responses in D. kotschyi, thereby facilitating plant growth. In a study by , higher levels of POD and CAT activity were observed in Vigna radiata (L.) R.Wilczek treated with 10 ppm of iron-chelate NP, which supports our findings. demonstrated excessive ROS production in Citrus maxima (Burm.) Merr. induced by Fe2O3, accompanied by increased production of antioxidant enzymes such as POD and CAT. Insufficient iron as a cofactor in the antioxidant enzyme structures diminishes their effectiveness and makes the plant more vulnerable to environmental stresses (). In a study by , it was reported that the activities of POD iso-2enzymes in soybean and sunflower leaves were significantly reduced when grown in a nutrient solution lacking iron. This decrease in activity negatively impacted the plants' ability to scavenge H2O2. demonstrated that the application of 25 ppm Fe2O3 NPs had a significant positive impact on the morphophysiological and biochemical properties of E. tereticornis, alleviating oxidative stress.
Fe2O3 NPs can enter plant cells through both apoplastic and symplastic routes, where they interact with cellular structures and influence metabolic processes (). Their unique properties, including hydrogen bonding and ionic interactions, enable these nanoparticles to engage effectively with plant proteins and enzymes, potentially altering biochemical functions and metabolic pathways (; ). Recent research has shown that Fe2O3 NPs can specifically adsorb onto proteins and enzymes, potentially modifying their functions and significantly affecting biochemical pathways within plants (). Moreover, supramolecular interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, ionic interactions, and π-π interactions, can enhance the stability of these nanoparticles and promote their integration into biological systems ().
Based on the comparisons and the physicochemical properties of the Fe2O3 NPs studied, particularly their size and zeta potential, these NPs are within an optimal range for use as non-fertilizer agents. The particle size observed (20–30 nm) aligns with known ranges that positively influence plant growth and development. In contrast, smaller NPs (e.g., 13.1 nm, ) and larger ones (e.g., 60 nm, ) exhibit different biological behaviors. Medium-sized NPs, like those examined here, generally enhance nutrient absorption and improve plant growth due to their superior cellular penetration and interaction. Zeta potential is also crucial for determining the colloidal stability of NPs and their interactions within biological systems. The measured zeta potential of -7.30 millivolts falls within the expected range for similar NPs, indicating stability and effective interaction with plant cell surfaces. Compared to NPs with higher zeta potentials, such as -23.7 millivolts (), the Fe2O3 NPs in this study may offer more controlled physicochemical interactions, potentially leading to more favorable biological outcomes. In summary, the size and zeta potential of these NPs suggest they are well-suited to positively impact plant growth and development.
In this study, the highest essential oil content and yield was acquired upon foliar spraying with a concentration of 50 and/or 100 mg L− 1 of Fe2O3 NPs. A higher availability of nutrients could increase the essential oil production in medicinal and aromatic plants by improving the chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, plant growth characteristics, and the essential oil glandular trichomes (). It might be explained that the impact of iron on the secondary metabolite’s biosynthesis could be similar to stress signals and may lead to an enhanced biosynthesis of these compounds. The recorded results align with the findings of in Solidago virgaurea L., in Artemisia dracunculus L., in O. basilicum, and in M. × piperita. observed that the increased availability of micro (Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mn) and macronutrients (N and P) following the application of organic fertilizer resulted in a significant increase of the essential oil productivity in Thymus vulgaris L. In a study by , chitosan-Se NPs enhanced the EO content in Momordica charantia L. also noted that optimal morphological traites, essential oil content and yield of Anethum graveolens L. were attained through the application of nano-iron fertilizer. Such improvements in essential oil content and yield could possibly be attributed to enhancements in growth, photosynthesis, gene expression of enzyme involved in biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, as well as the distribution and size of secretory glands which serve as specific sites for essential oil biosynthesis after NPs application ().
Citral, well-known as 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadienal, is an aldehyde monoterpene consisting of a combination of cis and trans isomers called geranial and neral, respectively. The application of 50 mg L-1 of Fe2O3 NPs led to a significant increase in the concentration of geranial. Conversely, a higher supply of Fe2O3 NPs (200 mg L-1) significantly decreased the amount of neral in the essential oil. Geranial and neral exhibit spasmolytic, antimicrobial, insecticidal, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and chemopreventive effects (; ). These compounds hold significant economic importance in various industries. Geranial is a crucial component in the flavor and fragrance sectors, as well as in the production of consumer products (). On the other hand, neral has been identified for its anti-inflammatory properties, making it a potential ingredient in functional food products (). Both geranial and neral play a role in the horticultural trade, particularly in the cultivation of ornamental plants like Gerbera (). These findings highlight the diverse and valuable applications of geranial and neral across different sectors of the economy. Furthermore, demonstrated that geranial exhibited a higher inhibitory effect against fungi such as Aspergillus flavus, Candida albicans, and Trichophyton rubrum compared with neral.
The application of Fe2O3 at a concentration of 100 mg L-1 led to a significant increase in the concentration of δ3-carene in the essential oil of D. kotschyi. Additionally, the spraying of Fe2O3 caused changes in other major constituents of the essential oil, such as methyl geranate and geranyl acetate. Previous studies have demonstrated that the content and composition of essential oils, as well as their bioactive and protective chemical components, are influenced by genetic, environmental, and agronomic factors (). Similar changes in the essential oil constituents have been observed in M. × piperita (), S. virgaurea (), and O. basilicum () upon the use of Fe2O3 NPs, consistent with the findings of our current research. The precise mechanism through which the application of NPs modulates plant secondary metabolites is still not completely understood. Recent studies combining phytochemical and genomic approaches have shown that NPs can act as triggers for the production of secondary metabolites by various cellular signaling pathways, including calcium flux, mitogen-activated protein kinases, and ROS metabolism. These alterations in signaling pathways can lead to changes in gene expression levels and the activation of metabolic enzymes, ultimately affecting the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (). The DXS gene plays a crucial role in regulating the methylerythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway, which is involved in the synthesis of isoprenoids in plants (; ). Apart from its role in isoprenoid biosynthesis, the DXS gene has also been implicated in the regulation of iron homeostasis in plants (). Iron is essential for the biosynthesis of geranyl pyrophosphate, a key precursor in terpenoid production. Studies have shown that pyrophosphate, an iron-chelating agent, can stimulate the enterobactin-dependent iron uptake system, indirectly affecting the biosynthesis of geranyl pyrophosphate (). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that Fe2+ can enhance the hydrolysis of geranyl pyrophosphate, potentially influencing its availability for terpenoid production (). The role of pyrophosphate in iron uptake and transport further suggests a direct link between iron and the biosynthesis of geranyl pyrophosphate ().
5 Conclusions
The current study demonstrated that foliar application of both nano and bulk forms of Fe2O3 led to increased biomass and enhanced yield attributes in D. kotschyi. Both forms of Fe2O3 acted as growth stimulants, but the Fe2O3 NPs were particularly effective, showing greater improvements in plant growth, biomass, and tissue biofortification compared to the bulk form. Specifically, Fe2O3 in its bulk form improved the RWC of leaves. The application of 200 mg L-1 of Fe2O3 NPs and all tested concentrations of bulk Fe2O3 increased photosynthetic pigments. Our findings highlight the positive effects of Fe2O3 on flavonoids content and antioxidant activity in D. kotschyi whose highest values were observed with 50 mg L-1 of Fe2O3 NPs. The peak activity of PAL occurred at 200 mg L-1 of bulk Fe2O3. Both nano and bulk Fe2O3 treatments also triggered the production of H2O2, which in turn enhanced the activity of key enzymatic antioxidants (CAT, APX, and POD) in D. kotschyi. Regarding essential oil production, foliar application of Fe2O3 NPs at 50 and/or 100 mg L-1 yielded the highest essential oil content and yield. The 50 mg L-1 concentration of Fe2O3 NPs significantly increased the concentration of geranial in the essential oil. Conversely, a higher Fe2O3 NP concentration (200 mg L-1) significantly reduced the percentage of neral. Applying Fe2O3 at 100 mg L-1 significantly raised the concentration of δ3-carene. Additionally, Fe2O3 application led to alterations in other major essential oil constituents, including methyl geranate and geranyl acetate. Overall, the foliar spraying of Fe2O3 NPs not only enhanced the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of D. kotschyi, including growth parameters, yield attributes, leaf/steam ratio, essential oil content, and yield, but also minimized the environmental impact. Therefore, we recommend the application of 100 mg L-1 of Fe2O3 NPs as an efficient and ecofriendly treatment for the cultivation of D. kotschyi.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
PK: Formal analysis, Investigation, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft. HM: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. MM: Validation, Writing – review & editing. FM: Data curation, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
This article is extracted from PhD thesis of PK. The authors are thankful of the invaluable support of Lorestan University, Iran.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1475284/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AhmadB.ShabbirA.JaleelH.KhanM. M.SadiqY. (2018). Efficacy of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in modulating photosynthesis, peltate glandular trichomes and essential oil production and quality in Mentha×piperita L. Curr. Plant Biol.13, 6–15. doi: 10.1016/j.cpb.2018.04.002
2
AhmedA. M.Shafiei−MasoulehS.Mannaa MohsinR.Khalf SalihZ. (2023). Foliar application of iron oxide nanoparticles promotes growth, mineral contents, and medicinal qualities of solidago virgaurea L. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.23, 2610–2624. doi: 10.1007/s42729-023-01218-2
3
AhmedB.SyedA.AliK.ElgorbanA. M.KhanA.LeeJ.et al. (2021). Synthesis of gallotannin capped iron oxide nanoparticles and their broad spectrum biological applications. RSC Adv.11, 9880–9893. doi: 10.1039/D1RA00220A
4
AlabdallahM.KotbM. (2024). Biochemical interactions of Fe2O3 nanoparticles with plant proteins and enzymes. Int. J. Phytoremediation26, 220–234.
5
AliK.AhmedB.KhanM. S.MusarratJ. (2018). Differential surface contact killing of pristine and low EPS Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Aloe vera capped hematite (α-Fe2O3) nanoparticles. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol.188, 146–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.09.017
6
AlshegaihiR. M.AlatawiA.AlomranM. M.KhalilF. M. A.SaleemA. (2024). Proteomic modulation by arsenic and microplastic toxicity in the presence of iron oxide nanoparticles in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings. South Afr. J. Bot.166, 591–602. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2024.02.001
7
AmooaghaieR.GolmohammadiS. H. (2017). Effect of vermicompost on growth, essential oil, and health of Thymus vulgaris. Compost Sci. Util25, 166–177. doi: 10.1080/1065657X.2016.1249314
8
ArdebiliZ. O.ArdebiliN. O.JaliliS.SafiallahS. (2015). The modified qualities of basil plants by selenium and/or ascorbic acid. Turkish J. Bot.39, 401–407. doi: 10.3906/bot-1404-20
9
AsadA.RafiqueR. (2000). Effect of zinc, copper, iron and manganese on the yield and yield components of wheat in Tehsil Peshawar. Pak. J. Biol. Sci.3, 1615–1620. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2000.1615.1620
10
Asadi-KavanZ.Khavari-NejadR.IranbakhshA.NajafiF. (2020). Cooperative effects of iron oxide nanoparticle (α- Fe2O3) and citrate on germination and oxidative system of evening primrose (Oenthera biennis L.). J. Plant Interact.15, 166–179. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2020.1774671
11
Asadi-KavanZ.Khavari-NejadR.IranbakhshA.NajafiF. (2023). Influence of iron oxide nanoparticles and bulk (α-Fe2o3) on metabolic and physiological characteristics of Oenothera biennis L. Plant. Russ. J. Plant Physiol.70, 101. doi: 10.1134/S1021443723600101
12
AzimiF.OraeiM.GohariG.PanahiradS.FarmarziA. (2021). Chitosan- selenium nanoparticles (Cs–Se NPs) modulate the photosynthesis parameters, antioxidant enzymes activities and essential oils in Dracocephalum moldavica L. under cadmium toxicity stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem.167, 257–268. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.08.013
13
BabajaniA.IranbakhshA.Oraghi ArdebiliZ.EslamiB. (2019). Differential growth, nutrition, physiology, and gene expression in Melissa officinalis mediated by zinc oxide and elemental selenium nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res.26, 24430–24444. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05676-z
14
BaoS. D. (2000). Soil Agro-chemistrical Analysis, third ed (China: China Agricultural Press).
15
BarnesJ.AndersonL. A.PhillipsonJ. D. (2007). Herbal Medicines, third ed (London, Chicago: Pharmaceutical Press).
16
BecanaM.MoranJ. F.Iturbe-OrmaetxeI. (1998). Iron-dependent oxygen free radical generation in plants subjected to environmental stress: toxicity and antioxidant protection. Plant Soil201, 137–147. doi: 10.1023/A:1004375732137
17
BeiranvandiM.AkbariN.AhmadiA.MumivandH.NazarianF. (2022). Biochar and super absorbent polymer improved growth, yield, and phytochemical characteristics of Satureja rechingeri Jamzad in water-deficiency conditions. Ind. Crops Prod183, 114959. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114959
18
BenzieI. F.StrainJ. (1996). The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as measure of ‘antioxidant power’: the FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem.239, 70–76. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0292
19
BuscheM.AcatayC.MartensS.WeisshaarB.StrackeR. (2021). Functional characterisation of Banana (Musa spp.) 2-oxoglutaratedependent dioxygenases involved in flavonoid biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci.12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.701780
20
CaiL.CaiL.JiaH.LiuC.WangD.SunX. (2020). Foliar exposure of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on Nicotiana benthamiana: evidence for nanoparticles uptake, plant growth promoter and defense response elicitor against plant virus. J. Hazard. Mater393, 122415. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122415
21
ChenW.ViljoenA. (2010). Geraniol — A review of a commercially important fragrance material. S. Afr. J. Bot.76, 643–651. doi: 10.1016/J.SAJB.2010.05.008
22
DanaeeE.AbdossiV. (2021). Effect of foliar application of iron, potassium, and zinc nano-chelates on nutritional value and essential oil of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Food Health4, 13–20.
23
DasK.RoychoudhuryA. (2014). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Front. Environ. Sci.2, 53. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2014.00053
24
De ZwartI. I.MeadeS. J.PrattA. J. (2004). Biomimetic phosphoryl transfer catalysed by iron(II) mineral precipitates. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta68, 4093–4098. doi: 10.1016/J.GCA.2004.01.028
25
DjanaguiramanM.BoyleD. L.WeltiR.JagadishS. V. K.PrasadP. V. V. (2018). Decreased photosynthetic rate under high temperature in wheat is due to lipid desaturation, oxidation, acylation, and damage of organelles. BMC Plant Biol.18, 1-17. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1263-z
26
EbadollahiR.JafariradS.Kosari-NasabM.MahjouriS. (2019). Effect of explant source, perlite nanoparticles and tio2/perlite nanocomposites on phytochemical composition of metabolites in callus cultures of Hypericum perforatum. Sci. Rep.9, 1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49504-3
27
FerratI. L.LovaC. J. (1999). Relation between relative water content, Nitrogen pools and growth of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. acutifolius, A. Gray during water deficit. Crop Sci.39, 467–4 74. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X0039000200028x
28
GallegoS. M.BenavídesM. P.TomaroM. L. (1996). Effect of heavy metal ion excess on sunflower leaves: evidence for involvement of oxidative stress. Plant Sci.121, 151e159. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(96)04528-1
29
Garza-AlonsoC. A.Cadenas-PliegoG.Juárez-MaldonadoA.González-FuentesJ. A.TortellaG.Benavides-MendozaA. (2023). Fe2O3 nanoparticles can replace Fe-EDTA fertilizer and boost the productivity and quality of Raphanus sativus in a soilless system. Scientia Hortic.321, 112261. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112261
30
GermM.KreftI.StibiljV.Urbanc-BerčičO. (2007). Combined effects of selenium and drought on photosynthesis and mitochondrial respiration in potato. Plant Physiol. Biochem.45, 162–167. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.01.009
31
GhaffarzadehZ.IranbakhshA.EbadiM. (2021). Evaluation of potential physiological and molecular responses of basil (Ocimum basilicum) to the application of Fe2O3 Nanoparticles. J. Nanostruct. Chem.12, 589–597. doi: 10.1007/s40097021-00438-1
32
Ghassemi-GolezaniK.AbdoliS. (2021). Improving ATPase and PPase activities, nutrient uptake and growth of salt stressed ajowan plants by salicylic acid and iron-oxide nanoparticles. Plant Cell Rep.40, 559–573. doi: 10.1007/s00299-020-02652-7
33
GholinezhadE. (2017). Effect of drought stress and Fe nano-fertilizer on seed yield, morphological traits, essential oil percentage and yield of dill (Anethum graveolens L.). J. Essent. Oil-Bearing Plants20, 1006–1017. doi: 10.1080/0972060X.2017.1362999
34
GhorbanpourM. (2015). Major essential oil constituents, total phenolics and flavonoids content and antioxidant activity of Salvia officinalis plant in response to nano-titanium dioxide. Ind. J. Plant Physiol.20, 249–256. doi: 10.1007/s40502-015-0170-7
35
GrilloR.MattosB. D.AntunesD. R.ForiniM. M. L.MonikhF. A.RojasO. J. (2021). Foliage adhesion and interactions with particulate delivery systems for plant nanobionics and intelligent agriculture. Nano Today37, 101078. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101078
36
HangC. C.YangM. H.WenH. M.ChernJ. C. (2002). Estimation of total flavonoid content in proplis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J. Food Drug Anal.10, 178–182. doi: 10.38212/2224-6614.2748
37
HasanM.XueH.ZafarA.ul HaqA.TariqT.AhmadM. M.et al. (2023). Biochemical surface functionalization of iron oxide for efficient biomarker detector: A new visions of nano-bio interactions. Appl. Surface Sci. Adv.18, 100486. doi: 10.1016/j.apsadv.2023.100486
38
HassanpouraghdamM. B.MehrabaniL. V.KheirollahiN.SoltanbeigiA.KhoshmaramL. (2022). Foliar application of graphene oxide, Fe, and Zn on Artemisia dracunculus L. under salinity. Sci. Agric.80. doi: 10.1590/1678-992X-2021-0202
39
HatamiM.HosseiniS. M.GhorbanpourM.KarimanK. (2019). Physiological and antioxidative responses to GO/PANI nanocomposite in intact and demucilaged seeds and young seedlings of Salvia mirzayanii. Chemosphere233, 920–935. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.268
40
HaydarM. S.GhoshS.MandalP. (2022). Application of iron oxide nanoparticles as micronutrient fertilizer in mulberry propagation. J. Plant Growth Regul.41, 1726–1746. doi: 10.1007/s00344-021-10413-3
41
Hosseini-SharifabadA.SadraeiH.HashemniaM.SajjadiS. E.Mirdamadi (2021). Effect of hydroalcoholic and aqueous extracts of Dracocephalum kotschyi on bleomycin induced pulmonary Fibrosis. J. Herbmed Pharmacol.10, 209–217. doi: 10.34172/jhp.2021.23
42
HuJ.GuoH.LiJ.WangY.XiaoL.XingB. (2017). Interaction of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles with Citrus maxima leaves and the corresponding physiological effects via foliar application. J. Nanobiotechnol15, 15. doi: 10.1186/s12951-017-0286-1
43
JabeenN.AhmadR. (2011). Effect of foliar-application boron and manganese on growth and biochemical activities in sunflower under saline conditions. Pak. J. Bot.43, 1271–1282.
44
JadidiM.MumivandH.NiaA. E.ShayeganfarA.MaggiF. (2023). UV-A and UV-B combined with PAR intensity change in plant growth, total phenol, flavonoid, antioxidative and essential oil composition of Pelargonium graveolens. BMC Plant Biol.23, 555. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04556-6
45
JafariS.Mousavi-FardS.Rezaei NejadA.MumivandH.SorkhehK.NikoloudakisN.et al. (2022). Chitosan and titanium dioxide are more effective in improving seed yield and quality in nanoparticle compared with non-structured form: a case study in five milk thistle ecotypes (Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn.). Agronomy12, 1827. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12081827
46
JalalA.ShahS.FilhoM. C. M. T.KhanA.ShahT.HussainZ.et al. (2020). Yield and phenological indices of wheat as affected by exogenous fertilization of zinc and iron. Rev. Brasileria Cienc. Agrar.15, e7730. doi: 10.5039/agraria.v15i1a7730
47
KaliszA.HuskaD.JurkowR.DvořákM.KlejdusB.CarusoG.et al. (2021). Nanoparticles of cerium, iron, and silicon oxides change the metabolism of phenols and flavonoids in butterhead lettuce and sweet pepper seedlings. Environ. Sci. J. Integr. Environ. Res.: Nano8, 1945–1959. doi: 10.1039/D1EN00262G
48
KhanM. A.AliA.MohammadS.AliH.KhanT.MashwaniZ.-R.et al. (2020). Iron nano modulated growth and biosynthesis of steviol glycosides in Stevia rebaudiana. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult143, 121–130. doi: 10.1007/s11240-020-01902-6
49
KimJ. H.KimD.SeoS. M.KimD. (2019). Physiological effects of zero-valent iron nanoparticles in rhizosphere on edible crop, Medicago sativa (Alfalfa), grown in soil. Ecotoxicology28, 869–877. doi: 10.1007/s10646-019-02083-5
50
KiumarziF.MorshedlooM. R.ZahediS. M.MumivandH.BehtashF.HanoC.et al. (2022). Selenium nanoparticles (Se-NPs) alleviates salinity damages and improves phytochemical characteristics of pineapple mint (Mentha suaveolens Ehrh.). Plants11, 1384. doi: 10.3390/plants11101384
51
KolevaL.UmarA.YasinN. A.ShahA. A.SiddiquiM. H.AlamriS.et al. (2022). Iron oxide and silicon nanoparticles modulate mineral nutrient homeostasis and metabolism in cadmium-stressed Phaseolus vulgaris. Front. Plant Sci.13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.806781
52
KumarA.GuptaA.ChauhanM. S. (2021). Safety assessment of iron oxide nanoparticles in the environment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.40, 1829–1842.
53
LiP.WangA.DuW.MaoL.WeiZ.WangS.et al. (2020). Insight into the interaction between Fe-based nanomaterials and maize (Zea mays) plants at metabolic level. Sci. Total Environ.738, 139795. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139795
54
LiaoP.YangT.ChouJ.ChenJ.LeeS.KuoY.et al. (2015). Anti-inflammatory activity of neral and geranial isolated from fruits of Litsea cubeba Lour. J. Funct. Foods19, 248–258. doi: 10.1016/J.JFF.2015.09.034
55
LichtenthalerH. K. (1987). Chlorophyll and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol.148, 350–382. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1
56
LingL. J.WangM.PanC. Q.TangD. B.YuanE.ZhangY. Y.et al. (2023). Investigating the induction of polyphenol biosynthesis in the cultured Cycolocarya paliurus cells and the stimulatory mechanism of co-induction with 5-aminolevulinic acid and salicylic acid. Front. Bioengineering Biotechnol.11, 1150842. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1150842
57
LucaS. V.MironA. C. (2016). Aprotosoaie. Phytochem. Rev.15, 591–625. doi: 10.1007/s11101-016-9457-1
58
MajdalawiehM.KhanS.IslamM. T. (2023). Using deep learning model to identify iron chlorosis in plants. IEEE Access11, 46949–46955. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3273607
59
McDonaldS.PrenzlerP. D.AntolovichM.RobardsK. (2001). Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of olive extracts. Food Chem.73, 73–84. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00288-0
60
Memari-TabriziE. F.Yousefpour-DokhaniehA.Babashpour-AslM. (2021). Foliar-applied silicon nanoparticles mitigate cadmium stress through physio-chemical changes to improve growth, antioxidant capacity, and essential oil profile of summer savory (Satureja hortensis L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem.165, 71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.04.040
61
MerineroM.AlcudiaA.BeginesB.MartínezG.Martín-ValeroM. J.Pérez-RomeroJ. A.et al. (2022). Assessing the biofortification of wheat plants by combining a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) and polymeric Fe-nanoparticles: allies or enemies? Agronomy12, 228. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12010228
62
MishraJ. (2024). Naturally biosynthesized secondary plant products and its importance: an overview. Plant Arch.24, 957–966. doi: 10.51470/PLANTARCHIVES.2024.v24.no.1.131
63
MittlerR. (2002). Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci.11, 15–19.
64
MoharramiF.HosseiniB.SharafiA.FarjaminehadM. (2017). Enhanced production of hyoscyamine and scopolamine from genetically transformed root culture of Hyoscyamus reticulatus L. elicited by iron oxide nanoparticles. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant53, 104–111. doi: 10.1007/s11627-017-9802-0
65
MohasseliV.FarboodF.MoradiA. (2020). Antioxidant defense and metabolic responses of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) to Fe-nano-particles under reduced irrigation regimes. Ind. Crops Prod149, 112338. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112338
66
MoradbeygiH.JameiR.HeidariR.DarvishzadehR. (2020). Investigating the enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense by applying iron oxide nanoparticles in Dracocephalum moldavica L plant under salinity stress. Sci. Hortic.272, 109537. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109537
67
MoradiH.GhavamM.TaviliA. (2020). Study of antioxidant activity and some herbal compounds of Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss. in different ages of growth. Biotechnol. Rep.25, e00408. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00408
68
MousaviS. E.HashemiM.MohammadiH. (2021). Environmental behavior of iron oxide nanoparticles: Degradation and impact on ecosystems. J. Environ. Manage.293, 112850.
69
MumivandH.EbrahimiA.MorshedlooM. R.ShayganfarA. (2021a). Water deficit stress changes in drug yield, antioxidant enzymes activity and essential oil quality and quantity of Tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus L.). Ind. Crops Prod164, 113381. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113381
70
MumivandH.EbrahimiA.ShayganfarA.KhoshroH. H. (2021b). Screening of tarragon accessions based on physiological and phytochemical responses under water deficit. Sci. Rep.11, 17839. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97388-z
71
MumivandH.IzadiZ.AmirizadehF.MaggiF.MorshedlooM. R. (2023). Biochar amendment improves growth and the essential oil quality and quantity of peppermint (Mentha × piperita L.) grown under waste water and reduces environmental contamination from waste water disposal. J. Hazard. Mater446, 130674. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130674
72
MumivandH.ShayganfarA.HasanvandF.MaggiF.AlizadehA.DarvishniaM. (2021c). Antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of essential oil from Thymus daenensis and Thymus fedtschenkoi during phenological stages. J. Essent.Oil Bear. Plants24, 469–479. doi: 10.1080/0972060X.2021.1947898
73
MumivandH.ShayganfarA.TsaniklidisG.Emami BistganiZ.FanourakisD.NicolaS. (2021d). Pheno-morphological and essential oil composition responses to UVA radiation and protectants: A case study in three Thymus species. Horticulturae8, 31. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8010031
74
NakanoY.AsadaK. (1981). Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol.22, 867–880. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076232
75
Nemati LafmejaniZ.JafariA. A.MoradiP.LadanMoghadamA. (2018). Impact of foliar application of iron-chelate and iron nano particles on some morpho-physiological traits and essential oil composition of peppermint (Mentha×piperita L). J. Essent. Oil-Bear Plants21, 1374–1384. doi: 10.1080/0972060X.2018.1556122
76
NeysanianM.IranbakhshA.AhmadvandR.ArdebiliZ. O.EbadiM. (2020). Comparative efficacy of selenate and selenium nanoparticles for improving growth, productivity, fruit quality, and postharvest longevity through modifying nutrition, metabolism, and gene expression in tomato; potential benefits and risk assessment. PloS One15, e0244207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244207
77
NouroziE.HosseiniB.MalekiR.Abdollahi MandoulakaniB. (2019). Iron oxide nanoparticle a novel elicitor to enhancing anticancer flavonoid production and gene expression in Dracocephalum kotschyi hairy root cultures. J. Sci. Food Agric.99, 6418–6430. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9921
78
OstadiA.JavanmardA.MachianiM. A.MorshedlooM. R.NouraeinN.RasouliF.et al. (2020). Effect of different fertilizer sources and harvesting time on the growth characteristics, nutrient uptakes, essential oil productivity and composition of Mentha×piperita L. Ind. Crops Prod148, 112290. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112290
79
PanX.LiY.PanG.YangA. (2019). Bioinformatics study of 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase (DXS) genes in Solanaceae. Mol. Biol. Rep.46, 5175–5184. doi: 10.1007/s11033-019-04975-5
80
PantP.PandeyS.Dall’AcquaS. (2021). The influence of environmental conditions on secondary metabolites in medicinal plants: a literature review. Chem. Biodiversity18, e2100345. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.202100345
81
Perrotte-PiquemalM.DanchinA.BivilleF. (1999). Pyrophosphate increases the efficiency of enterobactin-dependent iron uptake in Escherichia coli. Biochimie1, 245–253. doi: 10.1016/S0300-9084(99)80058-3
82
RahmatS.HajibolandR.SadeghzadeN. (2017). Selenium delays leaf senescence in oil seed rape plants. Photosynthetica55, 338–350. doi: 10.1007/s11099-016-0643-6
83
RajputV.MinkinaT.MazarjiM.ShendeS.SushkovaS.MandzhievaS.et al. (2020). Accumulation of nanoparticles in the soil-plant systems and their effects on human health. Ann. Agric. Sci.65, 137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.aoas.2020.08.001
84
RanieriA.CastagnaA.BaldanB.SoldatiniG. F. (2001). Iron deficiency differently affects peroxidase isoforms in sunflower. J. Exp. Bot.52, 25–35. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/52.354.25
85
RizwanM.AliS.AliB.AdreesM.ArshadM.HussainA.et al. (2018). Zinc and iron oxide nanoparticles improved the plant growth and reduced the oxidative stress and cadmium concentration in wheat. Chemosphere214, 269–277. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.120
86
RoostaH. R.EstajiA.NiknamF. (2017). Effect of iron, zinc and manganese shortage-induced change on photosynthetic pigments, some osmoregulators and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in lettuce. Photosynthetica56, 606–615. doi: 10.1007/s11099-017-0696-1
87
RuiM.MaC.HaoY.GuoJ.RuiY.TangX.et al. (2016). Iron oxide nanoparticles as a potential iron fertilizer for peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Front. Plant Sci.7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00815
88
SadraeiH.Rasouli-AmirabadiA. H.YegdanehA.TavakoliN. (2022). Bioassay standardization of drug dosage form prepared from hydroalcoholic extract of Dracocephalum kotschyi. J. Herbmed Pharmacol.11, 435–443. doi: 10.34172/jhp.2022.50
89
Said-Al AhlH. A. H.MahmoudA. A. (2010). Effect of zinc and/or iron foliar application on growth and essential oil of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) under salt stress. Ozean J. Appl. Sci.3, 97–111. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228443153.
90
SharmaS.AnandN.BindrabanP. S.PandeyR. (2023). Foliar application of humic acid with fe supplement improved rice, soybean, and lettuce iron fortification. Agriculture13, 132. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13010132
91
SheikhalipourM.EsmaielpourB.BehnamianM.GohariG.GiglouM. T.VachovaP.et al. (2021). Chitosan-Selenium Nanoparticle (Cs-Se NP) Foliar spray alleviates salt stress in bitter melon. Nanomaterials11, 684. doi: 10.3390/nano11030684
92
SinghR. P.HandaR.ManchandaG. (2021a). Nanoparticles in sustainable agriculture: An emerging opportunity. J. Control. Release329, 1234–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.051
93
SinghD.SilluD.KumarA.AgnihotriS. (2021b). Dual nanozyme characteristics of iron oxide nanoparticles alleviate salinity stress and promote the growth of an agroforestry tree, Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm. Environ. Science: Nano8, 1308–1325. doi: 10.1039/D1EN00040C
94
SonboliA.MirzaniaF.GholipourA. (2019). Essential oil composition of Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss. from Iran. Nat. Prod. Res.33, 2095–2098. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2018.1482550
95
Sotoodehnia-KoraniS.IranbakhshA.EbadiM.MajdA.ArdebiliZ. O. (2020). Selenium nanoparticles induced variations in growth, morphology, anatomy, biochemistry, gene expression, and epigenetic DNA methylation in Capsicum annuum; an in vitro study. Environ. Pollut. 265, 114727. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114727
96
SpinozziE.FerratiM.CappellacciL.PetrelliR.BaldassarriC.MorshedlooM. R.et al. (2024). Major monoterpenoids from Dracocephalum moldavica essential oil act as insecticides against Culex quinquefasciatus with synergistic and antagonistic effects. Ind. Crops Prod219, 119060. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119060
97
SreelakshmiB.IndujaS.AdarshP. P.RahulH. L.AryaS. M.AswanaS.et al. (2020). Drought stress amelioration in plants using green synthesised iron oxid Nanoparticles. Materials Today: Proc.41, 723–727. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.801
98
Taheri-GaravandA.MumivandH.FatahiS.NasiriA.OmidM. (2021). Modeling the kinetics of essential oil content and main constituents of mint (Mentha aquatica L.) leaves during thin-layer drying process using response surface methodology. J. Food Process. Preserv45, e15515. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.15515
99
TariqL.MangralZ. A.IslamS. U.AgrawalR.KhurooA. A.MajeedA.et al. (2024). Searching for nature-based solutions: Molecular ecology of an endangered Himalayan medicinal herb shows roadmap for conservation and sustainable utilization. J. Nat. Conserv.79, 126624. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126624
100
TombulogluH.SlimaniY.AlShammariT. M.BargoutiM.OzdemirM.TombulogluG.et al. (2020). Uptake, translocation, and physiological effects of hematite (α-Fe2O3) nanoparticles in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Environ. pollut.266, 115391. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115391
101
TombulogluH.SlimaniY.TombulogluG.KorkmazA. D.BaykalA.AlmessiereM.et al. (2019). Impact of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) and ionic iron on physiology of summer squash (Cucurbita pepo): A comparative study. Plant Physiol. Biochem.139, 56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.03.011
102
ÜnsalT.YaziciK. (2021). The importance of gerbera as a cut flower and advances of it in scientific research. Int. Students Sci. Congress Proc. 70. doi: 10.52460/issc.2021.010
103
VallièresC.BenoitO.GuittetO.HuangM. E.LepoivreM.Golinelli-CohenM. P.et al. (2024). Iron-sulfur protein odyssey: exploring their cluster functional versatility and challenging identification. Metallomics16, mfae025. doi: 10.1093/mtomcs/mfae025
104
VelikovaV.YordanovI.AdrevaA. (2000). Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid raintreated bean plants: protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci.151, 59–66. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00197-1
105
VermaR.DwivediP.SoniN. (2022). Ecotoxicity and environmental impact of iron oxide nanoparticles: A review. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res.29, 21145–21159.
106
VialM. V.RojasC. V.PortillaG.ChayetL.Pérez.L. M.CoriO.et al. (1981). Enhancement of the hydrolysis of geranyl pyrophosphate by bivalent metal ions. A model for enzymic biosynthesis of cyclic monoterpenes. Tetrahedron37, 2351–2357. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)88888-8
107
Villatoro-PulidoM.FontR.SahaS.Obregón-CanoS.AnterJ.Muñoz-SerranoA.et al. (2012). In vivo biological activity of rocket extracts (Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa (Miller) Thell) and sulforaphane. Food Chem. Toxicol.50, 1384–1392. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.02.017
108
WangZ.LeX.CaoX.WangC.ChenF.WangJ.et al. (2022). Triiron tetrairon phosphate (Fe7 (PO4) 6) nanomaterials enhanced flavonoid accumulation in tomato fruits. Nanomaterials12, 1341. doi: 10.3390/nano12081341
109
WangX.XieH.WangP.YinH. (2023). Nanoparticles in plants: uptake, transport and physiological activity in leaf and root. Materials16, 3097. doi: 10.3390/ma16083097
110
WhettenR. W.SederoffR. R. (1992). Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase from loblolly pine, purification of the enzyme and isolation of complementary dna clones. Plant Physiol.98, 380–386. doi: 10.1104/pp.98.1.380
111
WrightL.RohwerJ.GhirardoA.HammerbacherA.Miriam Ortiz-AlcaideA.RaguschB. (2014). Deoxyxylulose 5-phosphate synthase controls flux through the methylerythritol 4-phosphate pathway in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.165, 1488–1504. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.245191
112
YangL.WenK. S.RuanX.ZhaoY. X.WeiF.WangQ. (2018). Response of plant secondary metabolites to environmental factors. Molecules23, 1–26. doi: 10.3390/molecules23040762
113
YuanJ.ChenY.LiH.LuJ.ZhaoH.LiuM.et al. (2018). New insights into the cellular responses to iron nanoparticles in Capsicum annuum. Sci. Rep.8, 3228. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18055-w
114
ZayedB. A.SalemA. K. M.El SharkawyH. M. (2011). Effect of different micronutrient treatments on rice (Oriza sativa L.) growth and yield under saline soil conditions. World J. Agri Sci.5, 153–134.
115
ZhangJ.CuiS.LiJ.KirkhamM. B. (1995). Protoplasmic factors, antoxidant responses, and chilling resistance in maize. Plant Physiol. Biochem.33, 567e575.
116
ZhangJ.HuangS.YinY.YangL.LiX.JiaoW.et al. (2023). Fe2O3 micron particles are critical for electron transfer and the distribution of electrochemically active bacteria in soil MFCs. Sci. Total Environ.893, 164909. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164909
117
ZhangZ. X.ZhengE. N.WangC. M.FuN. H. (2017). Effect of different water and nitrogen levels on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and photosynthetic characteristics of rice. Trans. Chin. Soc Agric. Mach.48, 176–183.
118
ZhaoY.YuX.ChenW. (2023). Long-term environmental risks of iron oxide nanoparticles: A systematic review. Sci. Total Environ.857, 159294.
119
ZhengY.ShangY.LiM.LiY.OuyangW. (2021). Antifungal activities of cis-trans citral isomers against Trichophyton rubrum with ERG6 as a potential target. Molecules26, 4263. doi: 10.3390/molecules26144263
Summary
Keywords
iron, plant pigments, FRAP, citral, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase
Citation
Khanizadeh P, Mumivand H, Morshedloo MR and Maggi F (2024) Application of Fe2O3 nanoparticles improves the growth, antioxidant power, flavonoid content, and essential oil yield and composition of Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss.. Front. Plant Sci. 15:1475284. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1475284
Received
03 August 2024
Accepted
20 September 2024
Published
09 October 2024
Volume
15 - 2024
Edited by
Joao Antonangelo, Washington State University, United States
Reviewed by
Bilal Ahmed, Yeungnam University, Republic of Korea
Sumaira Anjum, Kinnaird College for Women University, Pakistan
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Khanizadeh, Mumivand, Morshedloo and Maggi.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hasan Mumivand, mumivand.h@lu.ac.ir; hmumivand@gmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.