ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 21 January 2025

Sec. Plant Pathogen Interactions

Volume 15 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1504135

Characterization and fungicides sensitivity of Colletotrichum species causing Hydrangea macrophylla anthracnose in Beijing, China

  • 1. Institute of Plant Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China

  • 2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Environment Friendly Management on Fruit Diseases and Pests in North China, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China

  • 3. College of Life Sciences, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, China

  • 4. Department of Biology, Xinzhou Normal University, Xinzhou, Shanxi, China

Abstract

Hydrangea macrophylla (Thunb.) Ser. is one of the widely cultivated plants in home gardens and scenic areas of China. Anthracnose disease is commonly observed during the normal growth of H. macrophylla, significantly impacting its ornamental and economic values. From 2021 to 2023, an investigation on H. macrophylla anthracnose was carried out in nine parks of Beijing, China, and a total of 114 Colletotrichum isolates were obtained from the diseased leaves with typical anthracnose symptoms. Based on morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analysis of six genomic loci including rDNA-ITS, ACT, TUB2, CAL, CHS-1, and GAPDH, these isolates were identified as belonging to six Colletotrichum species. Among which, C. gloeosporioides was the most abundant (65 isolates, 57.0%), followed by C. fructicola (33 isolates, 28.9%), C. aenigma (8 isolates, 7.0%), C. truncatum (4 isolates, 3.5%), C. subacidae (2 isolates, 1.8%) and C. sojae (2 isolates, 1.8%). Pathogenicity test conducted on detached leaves of H. macrophylla revealed a distinct variation in virulence among isolates from different Colletotrichum species, and wounding was either essential or conducive to successful infection. Specifically, C. gloeosporioides exhibited greater aggressiveness, resulting in larger lesions, while C. subacidae induced lesions most quickly. Fungicide sensitivity assays demonstrated that prochloraz exerted a remarkable inhibitory effect on the mycelial growth of representative isolates belonging to the three predominant Colletotrichum species. In contrast to difenoconazole and tebuconazole, the mean EC50 values for prochloraz against C. gloeosporioides, C. fructicola, and C. aenigma were 0.062, 0.033, and 0.023 μg/ml, respectively. This is the first report of C. aenigma, C. truncatum, C. subacidae and C. sojae causing H. macrophylla anthracnose worldwide including China. These findings have elucidated the Colletotrichum species associated with H. macrophylla anthracnose as well as their fungicides sensitivities in Beijing, China. This provides a scientific foundation for the accurate diagnosis and local management of H. macrophylla anthracnose.

1 Introduction

Hydrangea macrophylla (Thunb.) Ser., commonly known as an ornamental garden plant of the Hydrangea genus, enjoys great popularity due to its sizable inflorescence and abundant variety of flower colors (). The economic values have stimulated an increasing demand for cultivation and management of H. macrophylla, with particular emphasis on disease diagnosis and management (). As one of the typical woody plants worldwide, H. macrophylla is susceptible to many diseases caused by a variety of fungal pathogens throughout the growth period, such as Alternaria alternata (; ), Cladosporium tenuissimum (), Colletotrichum spp. (), Corynespora cassiicola (), and Phoma exigua (). Among which, anthracnose is one of the most important fungal diseases on H. macrophylla. It usually affects the leaves and flowers, leading to seriously influence on the ecological landscape construction.

Plant anthracnose is commonly caused by species within the genus Colletotrichum, which is a large group of plant pathogenic fungi and is ranked eighth among the top ten fungal plant pathogens worldwide (). Morphological characteristics comparison and multi-loci sequence analyses have been highly valued by mycologists for identifying Colletotrichum species. To date, a total number of about 280 species have been clarified (; ). However, the composition of Colletotrichum populations and the dominant pathogenic species responsible for anthracnose varied among different plants (; Zhou et al., 2023). Currently, four Colletotrichum species, namely C. gloeosporioides (), C. fructicola (), C. dematium (), C. siamense () have been documented on H. macrophylla anthracnose worldwide. Among which, C. gloeosporioides has been identified as a pathogen causing H. macrophylla anthracnose in Qinhuangdao, Hebei province, China () and in Kaili, Guizhou province, China (Zhang et al., 2016). Meanwhile, C. siamense was reported as the causal agent of H. macrophylla anthracnose in Nanchang, Jiangxi province, China (). A more comprehensive understanding of the dominant Colletotrichum species associated with H. macrophylla anthracnose will provide a foundation for developing novel strategies to manage the disease. However, the specific Colletotrichum taxa responsible for H. macrophylla anthracnose remained unknown in Beijing, China.

QoIs and DMIs are currently the major groups of fungicides employed for controlling anthracnose in agricultural crops (; ). Certain Colletotrichum species have exhibited varying degrees of reduced sensitivity or even resistance to such fungicides (). However, in actual production of H. macrophylla, unified management measures were frequently implemented but without significant efficacy. Moreover, the sensitivity of Colletotrichum species associated with H. macrophylla anthracnose to the commonly used fungicides were still uncertain. Thus, the aim of this study was thus (1) to identify the diversity of Colletotrichum species associated with H. macrophylla anthracnose by analyzing morphological characteristics coupled with multi-loci phylogenetic analysis, (2) to validate the pathogenicity and virulence of the identified Colletotrichum species by fulfilling Koch’s postulates, (3) to evaluate the sensitivity of the dominant Colletotrichum species to the commonly used fungicides, thereby providing a theoretical foundation for disease diagnosis and scientific management of anthracnose on H. macrophylla in Beijing, China.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Field investigation and sample collection

From the summer of 2021 to 2023, investigations into the incidence and severity of anthracnose were carried out in H. macrophylla growing nurseries of nine parks in Beijing, China (Table 1). Disease incidence was calculated as the proportion of H. macrophylla plants exhibiting anthracnose symptoms relative to the total number of plants under evaluation. A total of 46 leaf samples of H. macrophylla exhibiting typical symptoms of anthracnose were collected for further study. Small pieces (5*5 mm) of leaf tissues were cut from the margin of anthracnose lesions, surface sterilized with 70% ethanol for 30 s, 1% NaClO for 30 s, then rinsed in sterile distilled water for three times, finally transferred onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) with lactic acid (0.1%) and incubated at 28°C for 3 days. Subsequently, the growing edges of the fungal colonies were aseptically transferred onto new PDA plates. The obtained fungal isolates were purified by single spore method and then reserved in 25% (v/v) glycerol at -80°C. The prevalence of Colletotrichum species was estimated as isolation rate (RI) and calculated using the formula RI% = (NS/NI) × 100%, Where NS is the number of isolates belonging to a specific species and NI is the total number of isolates (). All the 114 Colletotrichum isolates were deposited in the Laboratory of Biocontrol Microorganisms, Institute of Plant Protection, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences.

Table 1

Sample sitesXiangshan ParkXishan ParkDaoxianghu ParkBaiwang ParkShuguang ParkBanjing RoadWufu ParkMentougou ParkFengtai ParkIn total
Sample numbers38436556646
C. gloeosporioides species complexC. gloeosporioides4114711876765
C. fructicola25246054533
C. aenigma1111010218
C. truncatum species complexC. truncatum0001101104
C. subacidae0101000002
C. orchidearum species complexC. sojae0000110002
In total7187141910131313114

Sample sites of Hydrangea macrophylla leaves with anthracnose symptoms and prevalence of the obtained Colletotrichum species.

2.2 DNA extraction, PCR amplification and phylogenetic analysis

Genomic DNA of the fungal isolates was extracted using the Solarbio® Fungi Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Solarbio, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The internal transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNA (rDNA-ITS) was amplified using PCR primers ITS1 and ITS4 in order to screen the Colletotrichum sp. (). For further precise identification, the representative Colletotrichum sp. were subjected to amplification of the partial sequences of actin (ACT) (), beta tubulin (TUB2) (; ), Calmodulin (CAL) (), chitin synthase (CHS-1) (), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) () genes with the corresponding primers listed in Supplementary Table S1. The amplifications were performed in a 25 μL mixture containing 10.5 μL ddH2O, 12.5 μL 2×PCR MasterMix, 1 μL DNA template, and 0.5 μL of each primer (10 μM) as described by . DNA sequencing was performed by Beijing B&M Biotech Co., Ltd., China, using forward and reverse primers. Sequences were subjected to BLAST searches and submitted in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database with accession numbers of PP709475-PP709509 for rDNA-ITS, PP768443-768477 for ACT, PP768478-768512 for TUB2, PP768513-768547 for CAL, PP768548-768582 for CHS-1, PP768583-PP768617 for GAPDH, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2

SpeciesIsolates numbersOriginsGenBank accession number
rDNA-ITSACTTUB2CALCHS-1GAPDH
C. gloeosporioidesJZB1040-3-1Fengtai ParkPP709475PP768443PP768478PP768513PP768548PP768583
JZB1040-10-3Xiangshan ParkPP709476PP768444PP768479PP768514PP768549PP768584
JZB1241-2-5Baiwangshan ParkPP709477PP768445PP768480PP768515PP768550PP768585
JZB1241-3-2Baiwanshang ParkPP709478PP768446PP768481PP768516PP768551PP768586
JZB1493-2-1Xishan ParkPP709479PP768447PP768482PP768517PP768552PP768587
JZB1493-4-1Xishan ParkPP709480PP768448PP768483PP768518PP768553PP768588
JZB1494-6-1Xishan ParkPP709481PP768449PP768484PP768519PP768554PP768589
JZB1372-1-4Wufu ParkPP709482PP768450PP768485PP768520PP768555PP768590
JZB1553-1-1Banjing RoadPP709483PP768451PP768486PP768521PP768556PP768591
JZB1124-2-3Shuguang ParkPP709484PP768452PP768487PP768522PP768557PP768592
JZB1558-2-1Daoxianghu ParkPP709485PP768453PP768488PP768523PP768558PP768593
JZB1562-1-3Qianlingshan ParkPP709486PP768454PP768489PP768524PP768559PP768594
C. fructicolaJZB1040-6-4Fengtai ParkPP709487PP768455PP768490PP768525PP768560PP768595
JZB1040-10-1Xiangshan ParkPP709488PP768456PP768491PP768526PP768561PP768596
JZB1241-2-1Baiwangshan ParkPP709489PP768457PP768492PP768527PP768562PP768597
JZB1241-2-7Baiwangshan ParkPP709490PP768458PP768493PP768528PP768563PP768598
JZB1125-2-5Shuguang ParkPP709491PP768459PP768494PP768529PP768564PP768599
JZB1556-3-2Daoxianghu ParkPP709492PP768460PP768495PP768530PP768565PP768600
JZB1562-3-4Qianlingshan ParkPP709493PP768461PP768496PP768531PP768566PP768601
JZB1492-6-1Xishan ParkPP709494PP768462PP768497PP768532PP768567PP768602
JZB1372-3-5Wufu ParkPP709495PP768463PP768498PP768533PP768568PP768603
C. aenigmaJZB1040-11-2Xiangshan ParkPP709496PP768464PP768499PP768534PP768569PP768604
JZB1241-3-8Baiwangshan ParkPP709497PP768465PP768500PP768535PP768570PP768605
JZB1553-1-4Banjing RoadPP709498PP768466PP768501PP768536PP768571PP768606
JZB1557-1-2Daoxianghu ParkPP709499PP768467PP768502PP768537PP768572PP768607
JZB1562-3-1Qianlingshan ParkPP709500PP768468PP768503PP768538PP768573PP768608
JZB1492-3-2Xishan ParkPP709501PP768469PP768504PP768539PP768574PP768609
C. truncatumJZB1241-2-3Baiwangshan ParkPP709502PP768470PP768505PP768540PP768575PP768610
JZB1125-3-6Shuguang ParkPP709503PP768471PP768506PP768541PP768576PP768611
JZB1564-1-2Qianlingshan ParkPP709504PP768472PP768507PP768542PP768577PP768612
JZB1372-4-1Wufu ParkPP709505PP768473PP768508PP768543PP768578PP768613
C. subacidaeJZB1241-2-2Baiwangshan ParkPP709506PP768474PP768509PP768544PP768579PP768614
JZB1490-1-4Xishan ParkPP709507PP768475PP768510PP768545PP768580PP768615
C. sojaeJZB1124-3-1Shuguang ParkPP709508PP768476PP768511PP768546PP768581PP768616
JZB1552-2-2Banjing RoadPP709509PP768477PP768512PP768547PP768582PP768617

Information of 35 representative Colletotrichum isolates from Hydrangea macrophylla anthracnose used for morphological characterization, phylogenetic analysis and pathogenicity test.

For phylogenetic analysis, additional reference sequences were selected based on related studies on Colletotrichum species (; ) and retrieved from GenBank. Individual gene datasets of representative isolates were aligned using MAFFT v. 7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) and adjusted manually with BioEdit v. 7.0.9.0 where necessary. The maximum parsimony analyses (MP) were performed based on the multi-loci alignment using PAUP v. 4.0b10. The analysis involved running 1000 replicates of a heuristic search, which utilized random sequence addition for initial tree construction followed by tree bisection reconnection branch swapping (). Bayesian inference analysis was conducted using MrBayes 3.1.2. The phylogenetic trees were visualized via TreeviewX v. 0.5.0.

2.3 Morphological characterization

For morphological characterization, mycelial discs from growing edge of the fungal cultures were transferred to fresh PDA plates and incubated at 28°C for 5 days (). Appressoria was produced by dropping 50 μL conidial suspension (106 conidia/mL) on a concavity slide containing moistened filter papers with distilled sterile water, and then incubating at 28°C in the dark for 48 h (). The shape, color and size of conidia (n=40) and appressoria (n=40) for each test Colletotrichum isolate were observed by light microscopy, and their dimensions were examined using an Axioscope 5 microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany). Mycelial growth rate of the representative Colletotrichum isolates was calculated by incubating the fresh mycelia blocks on new plates at 28°C with a photoperiod of 12 h/12 h for 5 days.

2.4 Pathogenicity test

Colletotrichum isolates representing different sampling sites or belonging to different Colletotrichum species were selected to conduct the pathogenicity test using mycelial plug method. Healthy leaves of H. macrophylla variety “Wujinxia” were collected, surface sterilized with 70% ethanol, washed three times with sterile distilled water, and then air dried on a sterilized tissue paper. Ten leaves per isolate with three replications were wounded by pin-pricking on both sides of the midrib with a sterilized needle, and 7-mm-diameter mycelia discs of 5-day-old cultures were inoculated, agar blocks without fungi were inoculated as control. Unwounded leaves were inoculated in the same way as described above. All the leaves were placed within a plastic box containing sterile water-soaked filter paper. The box was covered with plastic film and maintained in a growth chamber under condition of 85% relative humidity, a temperature of 28°C, and a 12/12 h light/dark photoperiod. Symptom development and lesion diameters on leaves were examined 7 days post inoculation. The fungus was re-isolated from lesions and recognized by integrated methods of morphological and molecular characteristics in order to fulfill Koch’s postulates.

2.5 Fungicide sensitivity of dominant Colletotrichum species

Representative isolates from the dominant Colletotrichum species, namely C. gloeosporioides, C. fructicola, and C. aenigma were selected and their sensitivities to three DMIs fungicides were tested using mycelial growth rate method (Zhang et al., 2020; ). The fungicides including prochloraz, difenoconazole, and tebuconazole were dissolved and adjusted to a concentration of 10 mg/ml as the stock solution. Each fungicide was prepared separately and the stock solutions were serially diluted as follows: prochloraz (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.1 mg/mL), difenoconazole (0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5 mg/mL), tebuconazole (0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10 mg/mL), and then added to the sterilized PDA (approximately 50°C) at a ratio of 1:1000 (Supplementary Table S2). The margin of 5-day-old culture was used to produce 5-mm-diameter mycelial discs, which were then placed at the center of PDA plates with varying concentrations of fungicides. The diameter of each colony was measured in two perpendicular directions, after incubated at 28°C in the dark for 7 days. The percentage inhibition of mycelial growth for each Colletotrichum isolate at each test concentration (I) was also calculated as the difference between the radial growth of nonamended control (C) and the radial growth of each test concentration (T) as follows: I (%) = (C-T)/C×100. Each treatment was tested three times, with three plates for each replication. The EC50 values of the fungicides were calculated and displayed as the mean values derived from 12, 9, and 6 representative isolates of C. gloeosporioides, C. fructicola, and C. aenigma, respectively.

2.6 Statistical analysis

All the data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation of three replications unless otherwise mentioned. Significance of the differences (P < 0.05) was evaluated by one-way analysis of the variance (ANOVA) using the SPSS v21 software. The EC50 values were calculated by linear regression of the probit-transformed relative inhibition value on the log10- transformed fungicide concentration using the statistical algorithms.

3 Results

3.1 Disease survey and prevalence of Colletotrichum species

During the investigation of H. macrophylla foliar disease from 2021-2023, severe anthracnose symptoms were observed with disease incidence ranging from 23.3%-56.7% in nine parks across Beijing, China. The disease was first observed on newly emerged leaves of H. macrophylla, the infection quickly spread to the around plants in the late growing season. Typical symptoms were initially manifested as tiny purplish-red spots, approximately the size of pinheads with a yellow halo, which subsequently transitioned to light brown or grayish white with brown margins. As the symptoms advanced, these spots ultimately enlarged and merged, resulting in the formation of extensive necrotic regions (Figure 1). A total of 154 monosporic fungal isolates were recovered from symptomatic H. macrophylla leaves. In addition, certain species belonging to other genera like Pythium, Alternaria, and Fusarium were also detected during the isolation process but not shown in this study.

Figure 1

Based on morphology and rDNA-ITS sequence data, the remained 114 isolates resembling Colletotrichum were primarily assigned to three groups, C. gloeosporioides species complex (106 isolates), C. truncatum species complex (6 isolates), C. orchidearum species complex (2 isolates). Further identification based on sequence analysis of six gene loci indicated that, C. gloeosporioides was the most prevalent species (65 isolates, 57.0%) associated with H. macrophylla anthracnose, followed by C. fructicola (33 isolates, 28.9%), C. aenigma (8 isolates, 7.0%), C. truncatum (4 isolates, 3.5%), C. subacidae and C. sojae (2 isolates, 1.8% each). Among which, C. gloeosporioides was the prevalent species in all the parks, C. subacidae was only found in Xishan and Baiwang parks, while C. sojae was only detected in Shuguang Park and Banjing Road (Table 1; Supplementary Figure S1).

3.2 Multi-loci phylogenetic analysis

A total of 35 representative Colletotrichum isolates from different sampling sites or belonging to different species were further subjected to multi-loci phylogenetic analysis with concatenated datasets of rDNA-ITS, ACT, TUB2, CAL, CHS-1 and GAPDH sequences (Figure 2; Table 2). Phylogenetic analysis showed that the present Colletotrichum isolates from H. macrophylla anthracnose clearly clustered into three clades with Monilochaetes infuscans CBS 869.96 included as the outgroup (Supplementary Table S3). Among which, twelve isolates within the C. gloeosporioides species complex grouped together to formed a clade with the ex-type isolate of C. gloeosporioides LF604, nine isolates clustered with ex-type isolate of C. fructicola LF130, while the remaining six isolates constituted a distinct clade along with the ex-type isolate of C. aenigma ICMP18608 and JFRL03-1005. For phylogenetic analysis of the C. truncatum species complex, four isolates were grouped together with the ex-type isolates of C. truncatum CBP002, while two isolates formed a clade in conjunction with C. subacidae NN054609. In addition, two Colletotrichum isolates from C. orchidearum complex were clustered with C. sojae ATCC62257.

Figure 2

3.3 Morphological characterization

Distinct morphological features including colony, conidia and appressoria of 35 representative Colletotrichum isolates (Table 2) were observed for each identified Colletotrichum species after 7 days incubation on PDA (Figure 3). Most isolates in C. gloeosporioides species complex developed greyish white to pale grey colonies, while the reverse sides of C. fructicola and C. aenigma were grayish green to olivaceous grey with white margin. The conidia were all cylindrical with obtuse to slightly rounded ends. Appressoria were pale brown to dark brown, subglobose or ellipsoid, and rarely irregular. The C. truncatum and C. orchidearum species complex were easily distinguishable from C. gloeosporioides species complex in terms of conidia or appressoria shape (Table 3). Conidia of C. truncatum was crescent-shaped, smooth-walled, and slightly curved with parallel walls. Conidia of C. subacidae was slightly curved, acute apex, the central part was almost straight with parallel walls. The conidia of C. sojae were cylindrical with obtuse to slightly rounded ends, and their appressoria were dark brown, oval or bullet-shaped. There was a considerable variation in mycelial growth rate among the representative isolates belonging to different Colletotrichum species (Table 3). The average mycelial growth rate of C. aenigma reached 12.6 ± 0.4 mm/d followed by C. gloeosporioides and C. fructicola, while the growth rate of C. sojae was only 7.1 ± 0.3 mm/d.

Figure 3

Table 3

SpeciesGrowth rate (mm/day)Colony appearanceConidia (n=40)Appressoria (n=40)
Length (μm)Width (μm)ShapeLength (μm)Width (μm)Shape
C. gloeosporoides
(12 isolates)
11.9 ± 0.4dense aerial mycelia, greyish white to pale gray, reverse dark brown with pale white margins13.44-18.51
16.96 ± 1.37
4.54-6.30
5.30 ± 0.81
hyaline, aseptate, cylindrical with obtuse to slightly rounded ends8.48-12.17
10.15 ± 0.81
6.14-9.51
7.24 ± 0.67
dark brown, ovoid to subglobose, slightly irregular, pear shaped
C. fructicola
(9 isolates)
10.8 ± 0.5dark grey with white halo edges, reverse grayish green in center12.46-19.14
15.45 ± 2.13
4.52-7.49
5.90 ± 0.62
hyaline, aseptate, cylindrical with obtuse to slightly rounded ends8.49-11.15
9.32 ± 1.25
6.53-10.56
7.18 ± 0.63
brown to dark black, ovoid to subglobose, lightly irregular
C. aenigma
(6 isolates)
12.6 ± 0.4dark gray, reverse olivaceous grey with white margin12.74-16.79
15.37 ± 0.85
4.56-7.32
5.71 ± 0.43
hyaline, aseptate, cylindrical with broadly rounded ends8.35-13.92
10.71 ± 0.25
5.85-8.56
6.48 ± 0.18
dark brown, ovoid to ellipsoid
C. truncatum
(4 isolates)
8.4 ± 0.4pale grey, reverse olivaceous to dark brown with white margins and gray-black strips15.85-25.39
19.35 ± 1.87
3.44-4.32
3.89 ± 0.41
hyaline, aseptate, crescent-shaped, slightly curved with parallel walls4.69-11.20
7.81 ± 1.20
4.10-7.05
5.46 ± 0.53
light brown to dark brown, ovoid to ellipsoidal, slightly irregular
C. subacidae
(2 isolates)
8.9 ± 0.6flat with undulate edge, smoke grey with white margin, reverse greenish grey21.25-30.14
26.33 ± 2.35
2.56-4.28 3.15 ± 0.37hyaline, aseptate, smooth-walled, slightly curved, acute apex10.13-23.05
15.54 ± 4.42
5.10-7.34
6.25 ± 1.06
brown, ovoid to subcylindrical, rarely irregular
C. sojae
(2 isolates)
7.1 ± 0.3offwhite or light gray, reverse pale white to light orange14.23-19.50
16.54 ± 1.82
4.05-5.93
4.97 ± 0.34
hyaline, aseptate, cylindrical with obtuse to slightly rounded ends11.55-21.86
16.75 ± 2.86
5.31-8.97
7.20 ± 1.43
dark brown, oval, bullet-shaped or irregular

Morphological data of six Colletotrichum species associated with Hydrangea macrophylla anthracnose in Beijing, China.

3.4 Pathogenicity test

Pathogenicity test demonstrated that the 35 representative Colletotrichum isolates from different sampling sites or belonging to different species (Table 2) exhibited varying degrees of aggression on H. macrophylla leaves. Seven days after inoculation, all the tested isolates caused symptoms on the wounded leaves. The symptoms mainly manifested as dark brown or brownish, irregular lesions with yellow halos around their peripher on the surface of leaves, consistent with the symptoms observed in field (Figure 4). No lesions were induced in the control leaves inoculated with sterile PDA discs. Notably, certain species such as C. gloeosporioides JZB1040-3-1, C. subacidae JZB1490-1-4 exhibited the highest level of aggressiveness among the tested isolates. In contrast, C. truncatum JZB1564-1-2 produced small necrotic lesions. The remaining isolates had an intermediate level of aggressiveness (Supplementary Figure S2). To fulfill Koch’s postulates, the Colletotrichum species were re-isolated from the lesions of inoculated leaves and identified based on integrated analysis of morphological characteristics and multi-loci sequencing data. The re-obtained isolates matched well with the original ones that were used for inoculation. Further analysis showed that lesions on the wounded leaves were much larger than those on the unwounded leaves, indicating that wound is a crucial prerequisite for the occurrence of H. macrophylla anthracnose.

Figure 4

3.5 Fungicide sensitivity of dominant Colletotrichum species

A total of 27 representative isolates from the three dominant Colletotrichum species, namely C. gloeosporioides, C. fructicola, and C. aenigma (Supplementary Table S4), were chosen to determine their sensitivities to fungicides using the mycelial growth method (Supplementary Figure S3). Regarding the relative fungicide sensitivity of individual Colletotrichum species, we found that C. gloeosporioides, C. fructicola and C. aenigma exhibited greater sensitivity to prochloraz, since their mean EC50 values were only 0.062, 0.033, and 0.023 µg/ml. Colletotrichum fructicola exhibited significantly lower EC50 values against prochloraz than difenoconazole and tebuconazole. Among the three species, there were no significant differences in the EC50 values respect to difenoconazole and tebuconazole (Table 4). The fungicide sensitivities also varied among isolates within the same species. For prochloraz, the EC50 values of C. gloeosporioides spanned from 0.004 to 0.219 µg/ml, while those of C. fructicola ranged from 0.003 to 0.074 µg/ml and those of C. aenigma ranged from 0.007 to 0.064 µg/ml. Some isolates within C. gloeosporioides demonstrated an obviously reduced sensitivity to difenoconazole and tebuconazole, with EC50 values reaching 3.100 and 3.677 µg/ml, respectively (Supplementary Table S4).

Table 4

FungicidesC. gloeosporioides (12 isolates)C. fructicola (9 isolates)C. aenigma (6 isolates)
EC50 (μg/ml)EC50 (μg/ml)EC50 (μg/ml)
rangemean ± SDrangemean ± SDrangemean ± SD
Prochloraz0.004-0.2190.062 ± 0.066 a0.003-0.0740.033 ± 0.026 b0.007-0.0640.023 ± 0.022 a
Difenoconazole0.010-3.1000.749 ± 0.905 a0.029-0.7420.345 ± 0.298 a0.039-0.7790.215 ± 0.291 a
Tebuconazole0.045-3.6770.431 ± 1.039 a0.042-0.6140.153 ± 0.187 a0.039-0.1850.122 ± 0.057 a

Fungicides sensitivity of three dominant Colletotrichum species associated with Hydrangea macrophylla anthracnose in Beijing, China.

Means followed by different letters indicate significant differences within each species based on ANOVA (P<0.05).

4 Discussion

Plant anthracnose can be induced by numerous Colletotrichum species. Extensive host range and wide geographic distribution of Colletotrichum species might be ascribed to their enhanced genetic diversity to adapt to various environmental conditions. Series studies have been conducted on the pathogen composition of Colletotrichum associated with plant anthracnose (; Zhou et al., 2023). In this study, based on morphological observation and phylogenetic analysis, the Colletotrichum isolates associated with H. macrophylla anthracnose were identified as belonging to six species including C. gloeosporioides, C. fructicola, C. aenigae, C. truncatum, C. subacidae and C. sojae. This is the first report of the later four Colletotrichum species causing H. macrophylla anthracnose worldwide including China.

Traditionally, the species delimitation in Colletotrichum was mainly based on host range and morphological characteristic, such as the shape, color, dimension of colonies, conidia, and appressoria (). In recent years, the number of new Colletotrichum species has increased dramatically with the development of molecular technologies, as the formerly recognized species have been dissected into species complexes, each of which encompasses numerous phylogenetically distinct species. For example, based on the combined sequence data of six gene loci, all the Colletotrichum isolates associated with strawberry anthracnose were grouped into three clades, namely C. siamense, C. fructicola, and C. aenigma, which were formerly part of C. gloeosporioides species complex (Zhang et al., 2020). Among the multiple genomic regions, TUB2 could discriminate all species within the C. orchidearum complex. CHS-1 can assist in distinguishing and corroborating recently diverged species, and thus serves as an informative marker for Colletotrichum species complexes (). In this study, phylogenetic analysis derived from the molecular data of ITS, ACT, TUB2, CAL, CHS-1, and GAPDH gene sequences attributed all the Colletotrichum isolates into six species, which was in full accordance with the results of the morphological groupings.

Colletotrichum gloeosporioide, C. fructicola, and C. aenigma within the C. gloeosporioides species complex are globally distributed and possess a wide variety of host species (Zhou et al., 2023). Besides, C. truncatum has also been cited as a pathogen of many economically important plants worldwide, such as papaya (), watermelon (). Colletotrichum subacidae were obtained from the diseased stem of Asparagus officinalison and the leaf petiole of Ailanthus altissima in China (). Colletotrichum sojae was described as causal agent of anthracnose on pepper (Zhang et al., 2022) and American Ginseng () in China. This study demonstrated that all the six Colletotrichum species were capable of infecting leaves of H. macrophylla with C. gloeosporioides being the most prevalent species. Previous results indicated that wounding can break the quiescent infection and enhance the infectivity of Colletotrichum species, thereby resulting in a more rapid progression in wounded leaves (). Many Colletotrichum isolates cause obvious lesions on leaves under wounded conditions, but not under unwounded conditions (). In this study, pathogenicity test of Colletotrichum species were conducted under both wounded and unwounded conditions, it was found that wound is the essential condition for the occurrence of H. macrophylla anthracnose. Therefore, wounds when transplanting or pruning should be avoided in actual production so as to prevent pathogen infection and disease transmission.

Prochloraz, difenoconazole, and tebuconazole are the DMI fungicides that have been employed in the management of anthracnose in China (). In this study, three DMI type fungicides were used to assess their inhibitory activity against the dominant Colletotrichum species. Three species C. glosporioides, C. fructicola, and C. aenigma differed in sensitivity to certain fungicides with no variation. Among which, the effect of prochloraz was superior to that of difenoconazole and tebuconazole. Colletotrichum glosporioides exhibited reduced sensitivity to difenoconazole and tebuconazole compared with the isolates from the other two species, with three being species all from the C. gloeosporioides complex. DMI fungicides are classified as moderately risk in terms of the development of fungicide resistance, moreover, DMI-resistant strains have been detected on numerous crops (). Reduced sensitivity or even resistance to tebuconazole have been reported on C. gloeosporioides, the causal agent of anthracnose on walnut () and chili (). Therefore, attention should be paid to the sensitivity of the dominant Colletotrichum species of H. macrophylla to such fungicides, to prevent the emergence of resistance. In addition, the combined or alternative application of fungicides with different action modes should be adopted to reduce the risk of resistance ().

Better understanding of species distribution and individual characteristics of the Colletotrichum species associated with plant anthracnose is critical for development of disease management plans. This study represents the first comprehensive investigation of Colletotrichum species occurring on H. macrophylla anthracnose in Beijing, China. The knowledge acquired and the diversity of Colletotrichum species in H. macrophylla gathered provides a useful clue for resistant-germplasm selection and disease management. Future work may focus on the pathogenic mechanism of the dominant Colletotrichum species responsible for H. macrophylla anthracnose, as well as fungicide resistance risk assessment or resistance gene identification.

5 Conclusions

Here we provided the first detailed investigation of Colletotrichum species associated with anthracnose of Hydrangea macrophylla in Beijing, China. A total number of 114 Colletotrichum isolates belonging to six Colletotrichum species were characterized, and three species in C. gloeosporioides species complex were confirmed as the dominant species. We also demonstrated, for the first time, that C. aenigae, C. truncatum, C. subacidae and C. sojae were responsible for H. macrophylla in Beijing, China. Our results disclosed that these Colletotrichum taxa were pathogenic to H. macrophylla with varied aggressiveness, wound was the crucial condition for pathogen infection. Additionally, fungicide sensitivity showed that the inhibition effect of prochloraz were superior to that of difenoconazole and tebuconazole. Overall, this study provides crucial information for the management of H. macrophylla anthracnose in Beijing, China.

Statements

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Author contributions

JZ: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YC: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. YL: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. XS: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. TZ: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. WQ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The study was funded by the youth foundation of Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (QNJJ202313), the Innovation Capacity Foundation of Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, China (KJCX20230115) and Beijing Science and Technology Plan Project (Z231100003723001).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1504135/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    AktaruzzamanM.AfrozT.LeeY. G.KimB. S. (2018). Post-harvest anthracnose of papaya caused by Colletotrichum truncatum in Korea. Eur. J. Plant Pathol.150, 259265. doi: 10.1007/s10658-017-1265-y

  • 2

    CaiL.HydeK. D.TaylorP.WeirB. S.WallerJ. M.AbangM. M.et al. (2009). A polyphasic approach for studying Colletotrichum. Fungal Divers.39, 183204.

  • 3

    CarboneI.KohnL. M. (1999). A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia91, 553556. doi: 10.1080/00275514.1999.12061051

  • 4

    DeanR.Van KanJ. A. L.PretoriusZ. A.Hammond-KosackK. E.Di PietroA.SpanuP. D.et al. (2012). The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol.13, 414430. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x

  • 5

    DowlingM.PeresN.VillaniS.SchnabelG. (2020). Managing Colletotrichum on fruit crops: a “complex challenge. Fungal Divers.104, 23012316. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-19-2378-FE

  • 6

    FuM.CrousP. W.BaiQ.ZhangP. F.XiangJ.GuoY. S.et al. (2019). Colletotrichum species associated with anthracnose of Pyrus spp. in China. Persoonia: Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi42, 135. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2019.42.01

  • 7

    GaribaldiA.GilardiG.FratiS.GullinoM. L. (2007). First report of leaf spot caused by Alternaria alternata on Hydrangea macrophylla in Italy. Plant Dis.91, 767. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-6-0767A

  • 8

    GaribaldiA.GilardiG.MinerdiD.GullinoM. L. (2006). First report of leaf spot caused by Phoma exigua on Hydrangea macrophylla in Italy. Plant Dis.90, 1113. doi: 10.1094/PD-90-1113B

  • 9

    GlassN. L.DonaldsonG. C. (1995). Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microb.61, 13231330. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.4.1323-1330.1995

  • 10

    GuanY. M.ZhangL. L.MaY. Y.ZhangY.ZhangS. N. (2021). First report of anthracnose of American ginseng caused by Colletotrichum sojae in northeast China. Plant Dis.105, 3755. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-20-2440-PDN

  • 11

    GuarnacciaV.GroenewaldJ. Z.PolizziG.CrousP. W. (2017). High species diversity in Colletotrichum associated with citrus diseases in Europe. Persoonia39, 3250. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2017.39.02

  • 12

    GuarnacciaV.MartinoI.GilardiG.GaribaldiA.GullinoM. L. (2021). Colletotrichum spp. causing anthracnose on ornamental plants in northern Italy. J. Plant Pathol.103, 127137. doi: 10.1007/s42161-020-00684-2

  • 13

    GuoZ.LuoC. X.WuH. J.PengB.KangB. S.LiuL. M.et al. (2022). Colletotrichum species associated with anthracnose disease of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) in China. J. Fungi8, 790. doi: 10.3390/jof8080790

  • 14

    HuY. F.LuoX. X.XuZ. H.WangY. Q.CuiR. Q.ZhangL. H.et al. (2023). First report of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum siamense on Hydrangea macrophylla in China. Plant Dis.107, 2853. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-23-0328-PDN

  • 15

    JiangJ. J.ZhaiH. Y.LiH. N.WangZ. H.ChenY. S.HongN.et al. (2014). Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum fructicola causing black spots on young fruits related to bitter rot of pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) in China. Crop Prot.58, 4148. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2014.01.003

  • 16

    KimC. H.HassanO.ChangT. (2020). Diversity, pathogenicity, and fungicide sensitivity of Colletotrichum species associated with apple anthracnose in South Korea. Plant Dis.104, 28662874. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-01-20-0050-RE

  • 17

    KongtragoulP.ImamotoK.IshiiH. (2020). Resistance to quinone-outside inhibitor (QoI) fungicides in Colletotrichum species isolated from anthracnose disease occurring in Thailand. Curr. Appl. Sci. Technol.20, 7989. doi: 10.14456/cast.1477.8

  • 18

    LiC. X.CaoP.DuC. J.XuX.XiangW. S.WangX. J.et al. (2021). First report of leaf spot caused by Cladosporium tenuissimum on Panicle hydrangea (Hydrangea paniculate) in China. Plant Dis.105, 33822661. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-20-2640-PDN

  • 19

    LiuF.MaZ. Y.HouL. W.DiaoY. Z.WuW. P.DammU.et al. (2022). Updating species diversity of Colletotrichum, with a phylogenomic overview. Stud. Mycol.101, 156. doi: 10.3114/sim.2022.101.01

  • 20

    LiuZ. H.SongB.FuY. P.LiY. (2017). First report of Alternaria alternata causing brown leaf spot disease on Panicle hydrangea (Hydrangea paniculata) in China. Plant Dis.101, 21472148. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-17-0350-PDN

  • 21

    MaheswariC. U.SharmaR. K.PrabakaranN.NallathambiP. (2015). New host record of Colletotrichum dematium on Hydrangea macrophylla. Ann. Plant Prot. Sci.23, 183185.

  • 22

    MmbagaM. T.KimM. S.MackasmieL.LiY. H. (2012). Evaluation of Hydrangea macrophylla for resistance to leaf-spot diseases. J. Phytopathol.160, 8897. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2011.01862.x

  • 23

    O’DonnellK.CigelnikE. (1997). Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.7, 103116. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0376

  • 24

    QiH. X.LiS. M.YuJ. Y.LiuR.YangW. L. (2008). Pathogen identification and biological characteristics of anthracnose in Hydrangea macrophylla Ser. Nonwood For. Res.26, 8487. (in Chinese).

  • 25

    ShiN. N.RuanH. C.GanL.DaiY. L.YangX.DuY.et al. (2020). Evaluating the sensitivities and efficacies of fungicides with different modes of action against Phomopsis asparagi. Plant Dis.104, 448454. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-19-1040-RE

  • 26

    SwoffordD. L. (2002). PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. 4 ed (Inc., Publishers, Sunderland: Sinauer Associates).

  • 27

    TempletonM. D.RikkerinkE.SolonS. L.CrowhurstR. N. (1992). Cloning and molecular characterization of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-encoding gene and cDNA from the plant pathogenic fungus Glomerella cingulata. Gene122, 225230. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90055-T

  • 28

    VieiraW. A. S.BezerraP. A.SilvaA. C.VelosoJ. S.CâmaraM. P.S.DoyleV. P. (2020). Optimal markers for the identification of Colletotrichum species. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.143, 106694. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106694

  • 29

    VieiraW. A. S.MichereffS. J.MoraisM. A.HydeK. D.CamaraM. P. S. (2014). Endophytic species of Colletotrichum associated with mango in northeastern Brazil. Fungal Divers.67, 181202. doi: 10.1007/s13225-014-0293-6

  • 30

    WangQ. H.FanK.LiD. W.HanC. M.QuY. Y.QiY. K.et al. (2020). Identification, virulence and fungicide sensitivity of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides s. s. responsible for walnut anthracnose disease in China. Plant Dis.104, 13581368. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-19-2569-RE

  • 31

    WeiL. L.ChenW. C.ZhaoW. C.WangJ.WangB. R.LiF. J.et al. (2020). Mutations and overexpression of CYP51 associated with DMI-resistance in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides from chili. Plant Dis.104, 668676. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-19-1628-RE

  • 32

    WeirB.JohnstonP. R.DammU. (2012). The Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex. Stud. Mycol.73, 115180. doi: 10.3114/sim0011

  • 33

    WhiteT. J.BrunsT.LeeS.TaylorJ. (1990). "Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics." in PCR protocols, A guide to methods and applications. ,eds. InnisM. A.GelfandD. H.SninskyJ. J.WhiteT. J. (New York: Academic Press), 315322.

  • 34

    WuX. B.Hulse-KempA. M.WadlP. A.SmithZ.MockaitisK.StatonM. E.et al. (2021). Genomic resource development for Hydrangea (Hydrangea macrophylla (Thunb.) Ser.) - A transcriptome assembly and a high-density genetic linkage map. Horticulturae7, 25. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae7020025

  • 35

    ZhangC.DiaoY.WangW.HaoJ.ImranM.DuanH. X.et al. (2017). Assessing the risk for resistance and elucidating the genetics of Colletotrichum truncatum that is only sensitive to some DMI fungicides. Front. Microbiol.8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01779

  • 36

    ZhangG. H.GuH. X.SiS. L. (2016). Investigation and identification of plant diseases and insect pests in Kaili base of the national forest genetic resource platform. For. Pest Dis.35, 68. (in Chinese).

  • 37

    ZhangL. Q.SongL. L.XuX. M.ZouX. H.DuanK.GaoQ. H. (2020). Characterization and fungicide sensitivity of Colletotrichum species causing strawberry anthracnose in eastern China. Plant Dis.104, 19601968. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-10-19-2241-RE

  • 38

    ZhangN.YuanS. L.ZhuY. N.WangB. Y.XuY. Y.YangW. X. (2022). First report of anthracnose on chili pepper caused by Colletotrichum sojae in Hebei province, China. Plant Dis.107, 1633. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-22-0703-PDN

  • 39

    ZhouY. Y.ZhangW.LiY.JiS.LiX. H.HydeK.et al. (2023). Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with cherry leaf spot disease in China. Plant Dis.107, 500513. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-21-2538-RE

Summary

Keywords

Hydrangea macrophylla, anthracnose, Colletotrichum species, multi-loci phylogeny, fungicide sensitivity

Citation

Zhao J, Cheng Y, Liu Y, Shi X, Zhang T and Qin W (2025) Characterization and fungicides sensitivity of Colletotrichum species causing Hydrangea macrophylla anthracnose in Beijing, China. Front. Plant Sci. 15:1504135. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1504135

Received

30 September 2024

Accepted

27 December 2024

Published

21 January 2025

Volume

15 - 2024

Edited by

Abhay K. Pandey, North Bengal Regional R & D Center, India

Reviewed by

Julia Christine Meitz-Hopkins, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

Zhengnan Li, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Wentao Qin,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics