ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Photosynthesis and Photobiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1590884

This article is part of the Research TopicPhotosynthesis under Variable Environmental ConditionsView all 5 articles

Plant photosynthesis in Basil (C3) and Maize (C4) under different light conditions as basis of an AIbased model for PAM fluorescence / gasexchange correlation

Provisionally accepted
  • Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Photosynthetic activity can be monitored using pulse amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorescence or gas exchange. While PAM provides insight into the light-dependent reactions, gas exchange reflects CO₂ fixation and water balance. Accurate, non-invasive prediction of photosynthetic performance under varying conditions is highly relevant for phenotyping and stress diagnostics. Despite their physiological link, data from both methods do not always correlate. To systematically investigate this relationship, photosynthetic parameters were measured in maize (Zea mays, C4) and basil (Ocimum basilicum, C3) under different photon densities and spectral compositions. Maize showed the highest CO₂ assimilation rate of 30.99 ± 1.54 µmol CO₂/(m²s) under 2000 PAR green light (527 nm), while basil reached 10.56 ± 0.92 µmol CO₂/(m²s) under red light (630 nm). PAM-derived electron transport rates (ETR) increased with light intensity in a pattern similar to CO₂ assimilation, but did not reliably reflect its absolute values under all conditions. To improve prediction accuracy, we applied a machine learning model. XGBoost, a gradient-boosted decision tree algorithm, efficiently captures nonlinear interactions between physiological and environmental parameters. It achieved superior performance (R² = 0.847; MSE = 5.24) compared to the Random Forest model. Our model enables accurate photosynthesis prediction from PAM data across light intensities and spectral conditions in both C3 and C4 plants.

Keywords: Chlorophyll Fluorescence, gas exchange, machine learning, Photosynthesis prediction, C3/C4 plants

Received: 10 Mar 2025; Accepted: 21 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Pappert, Klir, Jokic, Ühlein, Tran Quoc and Kaldenhoff. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Isabell Pappert, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany
Stefan Klir, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.