Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Functional Plant Ecology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1633436

This article is part of the Research TopicDynamics of Greenhouse Gases in Forest SystemsView all 6 articles

Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Via Harvest Residue Management in Eucalyptus Afforestation on Brazilian Sandy Soils

Provisionally accepted
Jackson  Freitas Brilhante De São JoséJackson Freitas Brilhante De São José1Bruno  Brito LisboaBruno Brito Lisboa1Frederico  Costa Beber VieiraFrederico Costa Beber Vieira2Josiléia  Acordi ZanattaJosiléia Acordi Zanatta3Elias  Frank AraujoElias Frank Araujo4Juscelaine  Gomes MartinsJuscelaine Gomes Martins5Andressa  Classer BenderAndressa Classer Bender6Eduardo  CarnielEduardo Carniel6Cimelio  BayerCimelio Bayer6Luciano  Kayser VargasLuciano Kayser Vargas1*
  • 1Department of Agricultural Research and Diagnosis, State Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation, Porto Alegre, Brazil
  • 2Universidade Federal do Pampa, Bag, Brazil
  • 3Embrapa Florestas, Colombo, Brazil
  • 4CMPC, Celulose Riograndense, Guaiba, Brazil
  • 5Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources, Porto Alegre, Brazil
  • 6Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The greenhouse gas balance is a central theme in discussions related to forest ecosystems. In this context, the present study evaluated the impact of five eucalyptus harvest residue management systems on atmospheric C-CO2 retention in soil, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the global warming potential (GWP) in Eucalyptus saligna plantations. The management systems examined were: AR -all harvest residues retained on soil; NB -harvest residues kept on soil, except bark; NBr -harvest residues kept on soil, except branches; NR -all harvest residues (bark, branches, leaves) removed; NRs -all residues from the previous rotation and new plantation litter removed using shade cloth. Soil emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) were monitored over 12 months (October 2016 to October 2017). Soil samples were collected to a depth of one meter to assess atmospheric C-CO2 retention. Annual N2O emissions were low (0.11-0.23 kg N-N2O ha⁻¹ year⁻¹) and showed no clear relationship with the amount of nitrogen added through residues. The soil consistently functioned as a methane sink across all management systems, with CH4 fluxes ranging from -2.56 to -3.91 kg C-CH4 ha⁻¹ year⁻¹. The highest rate of C-CO2 retention in soil (-5,540 kg C-CO2 ha⁻¹ year⁻¹) was observed under the AR management system, while the lowest (-1,752 kg C-CO2 ha⁻¹ year⁻¹) occurred under the NRs system. AR management also resulted in the lowest global warming potential (-33,946 kg C-CO2 ha⁻¹ year⁻¹), primarily due to soil C-CO2 retention (15.43%) and carbon accumulation in biomass and wood products (84.57%). These findings demonstrate that retaining eucalyptus harvest residues in subtropical sandy soils, in conjunction with carbon sequestration in wood products, constitutes an effective forest management strategy for mitigating global warming.

Keywords: reforestation, carbon stock, Nitrous Oxide, Methane, soil quality

Received: 22 May 2025; Accepted: 18 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Freitas Brilhante De São José, Lisboa, Vieira, Zanatta, Araujo, Martins, Bender, Carniel, Bayer and Vargas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Luciano Kayser Vargas, Department of Agricultural Research and Diagnosis, State Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation, Porto Alegre, Brazil

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.