Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 16 January 2026

Sec. Functional and Applied Plant Genomics

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1706954

Transcriptomic insights into arabinogalactan protein mechanism of action in galactosyltransferase octuple mutants

  • 1Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, Athens, OH, United States
  • 2Department of Environmental and Plant Biology, Athens, OH, United States
  • 3Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States

Arabinogalactan-proteins (AGPs) are a family of hyperglycosylated hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins essential for plant growth and development and generally contain 10% protein and 90% carbohydrate. Eight galactosyltransferases (GALTs), specifically GALT2-GALT9, catalyze galactose addition to hydroxyproline residues in the AGP protein backbone and initiate glycosylation of AGPs. Arabidopsis galt octuple mutants that result from the knockout of eight GALT genes displayed severe phenotypic changes, prompting our exploration of the mechanisms of action of AGPs by comparing the transcripts of galt octuple mutant flowers and siliques to wild type flowers and siliques in Arabidopsis thaliana. Transcriptomic analysis of flowers from galt octuple mutants revealed 930 significantly differentially expressed genes (426 upregulated, 504 downregulated). Many of the downregulated genes are reported to be crucial for pollen tube growth, pollination, and flower development. In siliques, there were 1,476 significantly differentially expressed genes (1,027 upregulated, 449 downregulated), including the downregulation of genes for pectin methyl esterase inhibitors (PMEIs) and suspensor development. There were 45 genes commonly downregulated in flowers and siliques, which are reportedly crucial for glycosylation, glycoprotein synthesis, and cell wall modification. On the other hand, there were 194 commonly upregulated genes linked to calcium ion binding with kinases and phosphatases in the signal transduction pathways, cell-cell communication, stress response and pathogen defense response regulation in both flowers and siliques. These findings offer insights into plant molecular responses to AGP dynamics and provide a foundation for further investigations into the underlying mechanisms of action of AGPs by revealing the genes and pathways related to AGP function, suggesting that AGPs may mediate the effects of these genes or pathways, in part, by influencing signal transduction pathways involving kinases and phosphatases.

Introduction

Arabinogalactan-proteins (AGPs) are hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins that move through the secretory pathway to the plasma membranes and cell walls of various plant tissues and organs (Seifert and Roberts, 2007; Silva et al., 2020). They play major roles in plant development, signaling pathways, and cell wall integrity (Ma et al., 2022; Seifert, 2021). AGPs are implicated in the regulation of root growth (Bossy et al., 2009; Dolan et al., 1995), stem development, and differentiation (Ito et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2020; MacMillan et al., 2010), cell expansion and division, embryogenesis of somatic cells (Pérez-Pérez et al., 2019), sexual reproduction (Nguema-Ona et al., 2012; Pereira et al., 2015; Su and Higashiyama, 2018), fruit ripening (Leszczuk et al., 2020), wound healing, response to abiotic stress factors, and interaction with microorganisms (Mareri et al., 2019; Nguema-Ona et al., 2013; Rashid, 2016; Seifert, 2021). AGPs also interact with other cell wall polymers, specifically pectin and hemicellulose, to form a complex network that is important in regulating the cell wall dynamics (Velasquez et al., 2011).

In Arabidopsis, over 80 AGPs have been identified (Showalter, 2010), and they have a structure which has a protein backbone that is glycosylated with galactose, arabinose, glucuronic acid and rhamnose. The protein backbone is hydroxyproline-rich, and contains other abundant amino acids including alanine, serine and threonine and often contains in repeated dipeptide sequences such as Ala-Hyp and Ser-Hyp. The carbohydrate moiety makes up ~90% of a typical AGP, while the protein backbone makes up the remaining ~10%. The carbohydrate moiety plays a major role in the function of AGPs, as it constitutes the interactive molecular surface for AGPs to bind to other molecules. Glycosylation also creates patterns that can be recognized by signaling molecules such as receptor-like kinases (Borassi et al., 2020).

AGP glycosylation is a post-translational modification that occurs in the Golgi apparatus by the sequential action of enzymes called glycosyltransferases (GTs), including the GT 31 family of glycosyltransferases (Keegstra, 2010). The polypeptide component of glycoproteins is generated first, followed by carbohydrate side chains during passage through the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus. Glycosyltransferases are the builders of AGP glycan chains, and of these glycosyltransferases, eight galactosyltransferases from the GT 31 family have been found to initiate glycosylation of AGPs by the addition of the first sugar, galactose. These enzymes were named GALT 2-GALT9 (Basu et al., 2015; Dilokpimol et al., 2014; Ogawa-Ohnishi and Matsubayashi, 2015; Qu et al., 2008). Plants lacking one or two of these enzymes display various abnormal, albeit subtle phenotypes (Basu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2021). However, due to redundancy within this family of enzymes, the other family members compensate for the one or two that are mutated (Zhang et al., 2021). Therefore, to understand the functions of these enzymes, all eight genes encoding these enzymes were ultimately mutated/knocked-out, creating an galt octuple mutant (Kaur et al., 2023). The galt2 galt5 double mutant and hpgt triple mutant have been shown to have ~ 40% and ~ 70% reductions in glycosylated AGPs in young seedlings, respectively (Basu et al., 2015). Higher-order mutants lacking five GALTs (galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 galt6) show drastically reduced AGP glycosylation, with lower β-Gal-Yariv-precipitated AGPs and reduced arabinose/galactose in rosette leaves, stems, and siliques compared to wild-type (Basu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2021). Specifically, the octuple mutant displays not only a significant (~50%) reduction in the amount of Yariv precipitable AGPs in both flowers and siliques, but also a significant (~60%) reduction in the number of Hyp-arabinogalactan chains present in the Yariv precipitable AGPs in both flowers and siliques (Kaur et al., 2023; Moreira et al., 2023). Moreover, flower and silique development in the octuple mutant is significantly impaired compared to wild type plants based on comparative morphological and microscopic time course observations (Kaur et al., 2023). The octuple mutants displayed severe abnormal phenotypes including but not limited to a delay in bolting, underdeveloped anthers that affects fertilization, shorter siliques, and fewer seeds (Kaur et al., 2023; Moreira et al., 2023, 2024).

Although considerable research has been carried out on AGPs to understand their structure and functions, their mechanism of action remains a mystery. To understand the mechanism of action of AGPs, we decided not to focus on one AGP but to leverage on the fact that glycosylation is a crucial part of AGP biosynthesis. Glycosylation is essential for the functions of classical AGPs, where type II arabinogalactan polysaccharides dominate biological activity. In non-classical AGPs, glycosylation remains important but often acts in concert with non-AGP domains in the protein to mediate function (Leszczuk et al., 2023). With the understanding that the process of glycosylation and synthesis of AGPs was disrupted in the generated galt octuple mutants, we decided to study the mechanism of action of AGPs through these mutants. Considering the abnormal phenotypes such as abnormal phenotypes of delayed bolting, underdeveloped anthers, shorter siliques and fewer seeds observed in the galt octuple mutant, we found that the flowers and siliques have the most obvious phenotypic abnormalities. Using publicly available databases such as TAIR (www.arabidopsis.org), ePlant (bar.utoronto.ca/eplant/) and Arabidopsis Developmental Atlas Viewer (http://arabidopsisdevatlas.salk.edu/), we explored the expression patterns of the eight GALT genes in flowers and siliques. These genes show coherent expression during silique and flower development. Additionally, other studies have shown the expression of these GALT genes in flowers or siliques (Basu et al., 2015, 2016; Ogawa-Ohnishi and Matsubayashi, 2015).

In this study, we compared the transcripts of the galt octuple mutants to wild-type Arabidopsis plants using transcriptomic analysis/RNA-seq. RNA-seq is a method that used to study gene expression at the transcript level and reveals genes that are differentially expressed as a result of a treatment or condition, as well as the genes and metabolic pathways that are connected to the expression of our desired genes. Thus, in this study, we used RNA-seq to compare gene expression in galt octuple mutant flowers and siliques with wild-type controls, identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and associated pathways. Consequently, this work provides insight to the genes involved and associated with the mechanism of action of AGPs and to the various molecular and biological processes connected to AGPs, particularly in reproductive tissues.

Materials and methods

RNA extraction

The upper part of the inflorescence of mature flowers (stage 12-14, Smyth et al., 1990) were sampled at 35 DAG (wild type) and 45 DAG (mutant) from the primary inflorescence. Siliques were harvested at 10 days after pollination, which is 45 DAG (wild type) and 55 DAG (mutants), ensuring developmental equivalence due to the mutant’s known developmental delay. We selected 10 DAP siliques because we wanted a stage where the siliques are fully developed and the seeds are in active development prior to senescence. The organs were frozen in liquid nitrogen and subsequently ground into a powder with a mortar and pestle before RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted from the ground tissues using a QIAGEN RNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Cat. No. 74903). The samples, which included four replicates each of the galt octuple mutant and wild type flowers and siliques, were stored at -80°C. RNA integrity was assessed using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer and an Agilent Bioanalyzer. Samples with RIN scores >7 were shipped on dry ice to Azenta Life Science Facility for sequencing using Illumina Hiseq, obtaining paired-end (PE) reads with an average length of 150 bp, ~350M PE reads (~105GB), single index per lane.

cDNA library construction and Illumina sequencing

Libraries were first constructed using the Illumina Stranded mRNA TruSeq kit, and the libraries were sequenced. A quality check was conducted on the raw data. The reads were then mapped to a reference genome.

Read alignment and read count

Sequence reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic v0.36 to remove adapter sequences and low-quality nucleotides. The resulting trimmed reads were aligned to the Arabidopsis thaliana ENSEMBL TAIR10 reference genome from ENSEMBL using STAR aligner v2.5.2b, a splice-aware aligner that identifies and incorporates splice junctions to improve read alignment. This process generated Binary Alignment Map (BAM) files. Unique gene hit counts were obtained using feature Counts from the Subread package v1.5.2. Counts were summarized based on the transcript_id feature in the annotation file, considering only unique reads mapping to exon regions. Strand-specific counting was applied if the library preparation was strand-specific.

Differentially expressed gene analysis

Following gene hit count extraction, the resulting read count table was used for downstream differential expression analysis. Expression profiling was subsequently performed using DESeq2. DESeq2 was employed to compare gene expression between user-defined sample groups, with the Wald test generating p-values and log2 fold changes, using the R studio package. Genes were classified as differentially expressed if they had an adjusted p-value (padj) < 0.05 and an absolute log2 fold change (Log2FC) > 1. DESeq2 data was also used for the gene ontology and functional annotation.

Gene ontology and enrichment analysis

Gene ontology analysis was performed on the statistically significant set of genes by implementing the software ShinyGO v0.82 and iDEP 8.0. The TAIR GO list was used to cluster the set of genes based on their biological processes and determine their statistical significance. A list of genes clustered based on their gene ontologies was generated.

Results

Identification and analysis of differentially expressed genes

Seeds from the galt octuple mutants and wild-type Arabidopsis plants were planted to observe and confirm the reported phenotypic abnormalities in galt octuple mutants (Figure 1) (Kaur et al., 2023; Moreira et al., 2024). To investigate the transcriptional consequences of impaired arabinogalactan-protein (AGP) galactosylation, we chose to compare the transcriptomes of flowers and siliques from wild-type and galt octuple mutant Arabidopsis plants. As an initial validation of the RNA-seq data and the octuple mutant, we confirmed that transcripts for all eight targeted GALT genes (GALT2-9) were significantly downregulated in both flowers and siliques compared to wild-type. The reduction of AGP glycosylation due to the knockout of galactosyltransferases in the galt octuple mutant resulted in widespread transcriptomic changes in both flowers and siliques, but these changes varied significantly between the two organs. A total of 930 genes were differentially expressed in flowers, whereas 1,476 were differentially expressed in siliques, witha higher number of genes upregulated in the galt octuple mutant in siliques (1,027) compared to flowers (426) (Figure 2A). The number of downregulated genes was not so different between organs, with 449 genes downregulated in siliques and 504 genes downregulated in flowers (Figure 2A). This suggests a greater compensatory or stress-induced transcriptional response in siliques, which may reflect their involvement in seed development and their higher reliance on intact cell wall architecture and signaling integrity during post-fertilization growth (Di Marzo et al., 2022; Doughty et al., 2014; Herrera-Ubaldo and De Folter, 2022). Volcano plots (Figure 2B) were used to display the distribution of gene expression changes, with selected top genes labeled based on their statistical significance. Some genes, such as FAD7, HMGA, AT1G14890, and AT4G32120, were highly downregulated in both tissues. Others, like CEP2, ILA, and AT4G35690, were specifically upregulated in siliques while AT5G55450, CRK4, PNP-A and NIP5–1 were specifically upregulated in flowers. Chord plots in Figure 2C show global overlap and divergence between flower and silique expression profiles (Figure 2C). Figure 2D further distinguishes the relationships among upregulated and downregulated genes across tissues. The arcs represent genes shared between tissues, with ribbons showing the direction and extent of overlap. While some genes were co-regulated, others displayed opposite trends between flowers and siliques. Analysis of the overlap between DEGs in flowers and siliques revealed both shared and tissue-specific responses (Figure 2C). While a subset of genes was coordinately upregulated or downregulated in both organs, suggesting a conserved AGP-dependent regulatory network, most of the genes showed expression changes unique to either the flower or silique transcriptome (Figure 2C). Going beyond gene-to-gene comparisons, which are often insufficient for capturing shared transcriptomic responses across datasets (Olanrewaju et al., 2023), we examined the overlap in functional pathways differentially expressed in siliques and flowers. The limited number of shared pathways further emphasizes the divergent responses between these organs, likely driven by distinct developmental programs, hormonal environments, and structural requirements (Yu et al., 2020).

Figure 1
Three panels labeled A, B, and C show plant growth. Panel A shows the WT flowering earlier than the galt23456789. Panel B shows WT longer and more matured than galt23456789. Panel C show the siliques of WT longer than that of galt23456789.

Figure 1. Phenotypic differences displayed by wild-type Arabidopsis and galt octuple mutant plants. (A) Wild-type Arabidopsis and galt octuple mutant plants at 35 days after germination (DAG). (B) Wild-type Arabidopsis and galt octuple mutant plants at 45 DAG. (C) Wild-type Arabidopsis and galt octuple mutant inflorescences and siliques at 45 DAG. The galt octuple mutant, also named galt23456789, exhibited delayed bolting, underdeveloped flowers, and shorter siliques compared to the wild-type plants, reflecting severe developmental abnormalities resulting from the loss of eight galactosyltransferase (GALT) genes responsible for AGP glycosylation.

Figure 2
Composite image analyzing gene expression in flowers and siliques. Panel A shows a bar graph of differentially expressed genes, split by upregulation and downregulation. Panel B consists of volcano plots for flower and silique gene expression changes, highlighting specific genes such as FAD7. Panel C and D feature circos plots comparing gene expression connectivity between flower and silique, with up and down components. Panel E displays a heatmap of gene expression levels, varying from green (low) to red (high), across different samples, with labels for specific genes.

Figure 2. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of galt octuple mutant and wild-type Arabidopsis flowers and siliques. (A) Bar plot summarizing the number of significantly upregulated and downregulated genes in flowers and siliques of galt octuple mutants relative to wild-type plants. Siliques exhibited a markedly higher number of upregulated genes compared to flowers, indicating stronger transcriptional reprogramming. (B) Volcano plots showing differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in galt octuple mutant versus wild-type flowers (left) and siliques (right). Labeled genes represent the top statistically significant expressed genes. Blue-marked genes are downregulated (Log2fold change < -1). Red-marked genes are upregulated (Log2fold change > 1). Green-marked genes are non-statistically significant (p>0.05), but have Log2fold change above the threshold, while grey-marked genes are neither significant nor meet the Log2fold change threshold. There is nothing like 3/4 in there. (C) Chord diagrams depicting overlaps in DEGs (top) and enriched functional pathways (bottom) between flower and silique datasets, regardless of regulatory direction. (D) Directional chord diagrams separating upregulated and downregulated genes (top) and functional pathways (bottom) across flowers and siliques. (E) Heatmap of top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in galt octuple mutant flowers and siliques. The heatmap displays the log2 fold changes of the top 20 DEGs (based on magnitude and adjusted p-value) across both tissues, with upregulation shown in red and downregulation in blue.

A gene-to-gene comparison of the directionality of gene regulation revealed a striking subset of genes that were upregulated in one tissue but downregulated in the other (Figure 2D). However, while a non-directional comparison of the functional pathway enrichment between the silique and flower revealed few shared pathways, when directionality was considered a clear conservation in the upregulation or downregulation of specific functional pathways emerged in both organs (Figure 2D), indicating that while the genes may differ, the broader regulatory strategies converge at the pathway level.

Identification and differential expression of top genes in galt octuple mutant flowers

To identify key molecular processes affected by the knockout of the GALT genes, we focused on the top regulated genes as primary indicators of the most responsive pathways and potential mechanistic targets. These genes can serve as molecular markers to track or monitor AGP function and its downstream effects on development, cell wall integrity, and stress responses. Analysis of the most significantly differentially expressed genes in galt octuple mutant flowers identified both strongly downregulated and upregulated transcripts (Figures 2B, E; Table 1). Among the downregulated genes, FAD7 (AT3G11170), encoding fatty acid desaturase 7 and known to be essential to the Jasmonic acid mediated pathway for the regulation of growth and defense (Schaller et al., 2004; Wickramanayake et al., 2020), showed a log2 fold change (log2FC) of –4.4 (padj = 1.96E-261), while HMGA (AT1G14900), a chromatin-associated protein, was reduced with log2FC of –8.57 (padj = 2.65E-147). Two members of the pectin methylesterase inhibitor family (AT1G14890 and AT4G15750) were also downregulated, with log2FC values of –8.33 and –2.79, respectively. Additional suppressed genes include two galactosyltransferase family members AT4G32120 and GALT7 (AT5G53340), with log2FC values of –2.77 and –6.36. Other top downregulated genes included EXPA25 and EXPA23 (expansins), sks8, and members of the glycosyl hydrolase and alpha/beta-hydrolase superfamilies.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Top significantly differentially expressed genes in galt octuple mutant flowers.

In contrast, several genes exhibited strong upregulation. CRK4 (AT3G45860), encoding a cysteine-rich receptor-like kinase, showed a log2FC of 6.02 (padj = 1.59E-50). Defense and signaling-related genes such as PNP-A (AT2G18660, log2FC = 4.32), CHI (AT2G43570, log2FC = 4.11), PR5 (AT1G75040, log2FC = 3.86), and RLP23 (AT2G32680, log2FC = 4.70) were highly upregulated. Other notably upregulated genes included the lipid-transfer protein (AT5G55450), calcium-binding EF-hand protein (AT3G47480), eukaryotic aspartyl protease (AT5G10760), and glutamate receptor GLR2.7 (AT2G29120).

Differential expression of top genes in galt octuple mutant siliques

The most significantly differentially expressed genes in galt octuple mutant siliques included both highly downregulated and upregulated transcripts (Figures 2B, E; Table 2). Among the downregulated genes, FAD7 (AT3G11170), encoding fatty acid desaturase 7, showed a log2 fold change (log2FC) of –4.93 (padj = 6.12E-178). Strong repression was also observed for AT1G14890, a pectin methylesterase inhibitor superfamily protein (log2FC = –8.24, padj = 3.85E-82), and HMGA (AT1G14900), a chromatin-associated protein (log2FC = –8.18, padj = 1.15E-41). Several galactosyltransferase family genes were significantly downregulated, including GALT8 (AT4G32120, log2FC = –3.45), GALT7 (AT5G53340, –4.24), GALT4 (AT1G27120, –2.17), and GALT3 (AT3G06440, –2.70), with highly significant adjusted p-values. Additional suppressed genes included GASA1, BG3, RGF9, and a ChaC-like family protein (AT5G26220).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Top significantly differentially expressed genes in galt octuple mutant siliques.

In contrast, multiple genes showed strong upregulation. The most highly induced gene was AT4G35690 (hypothetical protein, DUF241) with a log2FC of 5.91 (padj = 4.07E-24), followed by CEP2 (AT3G48340, log2FC = 4.75, padj = 1.70E-33). Other significantly upregulated genes included ILITHYIA (ILA) (AT1G64790, log2FC = 3.84), NAP (AT1G69490, log2FC = 4.65), HB21 (AT2G18550, log2FC = 3.82), ATPMEPCRB (AT4G02330, log2FC = 4.11), and GDSL-like lipase (AT2G36325, log2FC = 5.49). Further highly upregulated transcripts included an alpha/beta hydrolase (AT1G68620), a bifunctional inhibitor/lipid-transfer protein (AT3G22600), and a transmembrane DUF679 domain protein (AT4G18425).

Shared gene ontology patterns between galt octuple mutant flowers and siliques

Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs demonstrated organ-specific divergence between flowers and siliques (Figure 3). Among the overlapping DEGs, 19 genes displayed opposing expression patterns between the two organs (Supplementary Figure 1). We focused on the 194 genes commonly upregulated in both organs and the 45 genes commonly downregulated in both organs (Figures 3A, B) which are more plausibly the direct consequence of disrupted AGP glycosylation rather than organ-specific variability. Gene ontology enrichment analysis of the commonly upregulated genes (Figure 3A) showed enrichment for stress-related biological processes, including responses to bacteria, external stimuli, and stress. Enriched molecular functions included kinase activity, calcium ion binding, and phosphotransferase activity. In contrast, the 45 genes commonly downregulated in both organs were enriched for processes tied to AGP biosynthesis. Enriched biological processes included arabinogalactan-protein metabolic pathways, O-linked glycosylation via hydroxyproline, and the assembly of hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins (Figure 3B). Corresponding molecular function terms included hydroxyproline O-galactosyltransferase activity, glycosyltransferase activity, and hexosyltransferase activity.

Figure 3
Venn diagram and network analysis showing gene expression data for upregulated and downregulated genes in flower and silique across biological and molecular processes. Subfigures A and B depict network clusters for biological processes like protein phosphorylation and immune responses, while M illustrates molecular functions such as enzyme activities. Circles indicate gene overlap across conditions.

Figure 3. Functional enrichment analysis of shared and organ-specific differentially expressed genes in galt octuple mutant flowers and siliques was performed with respect to biological processes (B in red) and molecular functions (M in red). (A) Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis for the 194 genes upregulated in both flowers and siliques. (B) Enrichment analysis for the 45 genes downregulated in both flower and silique tissues. The size of the nodes indicates the number of genes contributing to that enrichment pathway from the dataset while the connecting lines indicate the co-interaction of the pathways. The darker the lines, the stronger the interactions. Node interaction was generated by ShinyGO v.0.86 (Ge et al., 2020).

Functional enrichment patterns specific to galt octuple mutant flowers

The pathways that are enriched by the differentially expressed genes specifically in flowers are involved in various biological processes, molecular functions and cellular components. The upregulated genes in mutant flowers (Figure 4B) indicate increased metabolic activity and an oxidative stress response, with enhanced expression of peroxidases, antioxidant enzymes, and calcium-binding proteins, which play crucial roles in cell signaling and stress adaptation (Gadjev et al., 2006). High expression of cell wall-modifying enzymes, such as cellulase and glucan endo-1,3-beta-D-glucosidase, suggests compensatory mechanisms affecting pollen tube growth and flower development. Conversely, downregulated genes (Figure 4A) are involved in transmembrane transport, carbohydrate metabolism, and flavonoid biosynthesis which disrupts nutrient uptake, energy availability, and floral pigmentation, potentially disrupting pollination success and reproduction. The reduced activity of P-type ATPases and carbohydrate transporters may further weakens ion homeostasis and metabolic balance and could lead to delay in flowering time as well as an alteration in flower morphology (Andrés et al., 2020; Haruta et al., 2015; Mulet et al., 2020).

Figure 4
Network diagrams illustrate gene expression changes in plant structures, labeled A to D. Nodes represent biological processes and molecular functions, connected by lines of interaction. A Venn diagram in the center shows gene overlaps with quantitative data: “DOWN in flower” (504), “UP in silique” (1027), “UP in flower” (426), “DOWN in silique” (449).

Figure 4. Functional enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes specific to galt octuple mutant flowers and siliques was performed with respect to biological processes (B in red) and molecular functions (M in red). The central Venn diagram shows the overlap of genes differentially expressed across four categories: (A) Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis for the 447 genes downregulated in flowers only. (B) GO enrichment analysis for the 225 genes upregulated in flowers only. (C) GO enrichment analysis for the 397 genes downregulated in siliques only. (D) GO enrichment analysis for 827 genes upregulated in siliques only. The size of the nodes indicates the number of genes contributing to that enrichment pathway from the dataset while the connecting lines indicate the co-interaction of the pathways. The darker the lines, the stronger the interactions. Node interaction was generated by ShinyGO v.0.86 (Ge et al., 2020).

Functional enrichment patterns specific to galt octuple mutant siliques

The 397 genes downregulated specifically in siliques (Figure 4D) were enriched for biological processes like flavonoid biosynthesis and response to sulfur starvation. The downregulation of genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis observed specifically in mutant siliques can lead to reduced flavonoid production, affecting pigmentation, UV protection, and pathogen defense, making plants more susceptible to environmental stress. Similarly, downregulation of sulfur starvation response genes may impair sulfur uptake and assimilation, leading to growth defects such as chlorosis and reduced seed yield. The reduced seed set observed in the galt octuple mutant (Kaur et al., 2023) may be attributed to the disruption of early embryo development caused by the loss of suspensor-related gene expression. This is due to the fact that the suspensor, which is the embryonic region, connects the embryo to the seed coat (Kawashima and Goldberg, 2010). Reduced pectin methylesterase inhibitor (PMEI) expression weakens cell wall integrity, increasing susceptibility to mechanical stress and pathogens (Okawa et al., 2023). Conversely, 821 specifically upregulated genes in siliques (Figure 4C) are involved in protein-ligand interactions, calcium transport, and transcriptional regulation which suggests a stress-induced compensatory response to maintain cellular function in mutant siliques (Gadjev et al., 2006).

Gene enrichment clustering analysis of DEGs in galt octuple mutant flowers and siliques

To gain a systems-level understanding of how AGP glycosylation deficiency modulates plant transcriptomes, we conducted a gene set enrichment-based clustering analysis, grouping differentially expressed genes not by expression magnitude or direction alone, but by the functional similarity of their enriched biological, molecular, and cellular roles (Ge et al., 2018). This approach enabled the identification of co-regulated gene groups that operate within shared biological frameworks, even across organs with divergent transcriptomic landscapes. The resulting functional clusters revealed four major modules of interest, each representing a distinct physiological axis perturbed by abnormal AGP glycosylation (Figure 5).

Figure 5
Diagram depicting functional enrichment analysis across three components: biological, molecular, and cellular. The central heatmap compares siliques and flowers, categorized into C1 to C4. Surrounding bar charts detail gene enrichments for each component. Biological includes stress responses and signaling; molecular encompasses transport and binding activities; cellular covers localization and binding complexes. Each chart shows fold enrichment and gene counts.

Figure 5. Functional-clustering heat map of the gene enrichment analysis. Differentially expressed genes from galt octuple mutants were first hierarchically clustered based on shared gene ontology (GO) enrichment (padj < 0.05), yielding four functional modules (C1-C4, center heat map; green = downregulated, red = upregulated). For each module, bar charts (left = biological process component; center = molecular function component; right = cellular component) display the top GO terms (x-axis = fold-enrichment; color scale = gene count).

Cluster 1 consisted primarily of genes downregulated in siliques, enriched for biological processes including salicylic acid–mediated signaling, bacterial defense response, and inter-organismal communication, as well as molecular functions related to RNA polymerase II–associated transcriptional regulation and cellular components such as the photosystem and extracellular region (Figure 5, C1). Cluster 2 contained genes upregulated in siliques and downregulated in flowers, with enrichment for pollen–pistil interaction, pathogen defense, cytotoxicity, proton-exporting ATPase activity, symporter activity, and extracellular localization (Figure 5, C2). Cluster 3 comprised genes upregulated in flowers and downregulated in siliques, enriched for biological processes associated with water deprivation, oxidative response, and hormonal stimulus, together with molecular functions including peroxidase activity and localization to the nuclear CCAAT-binding complex (Figure 5, C3). Cluster 4 included genes upregulated in both organs, enriched for protein localization to the cell surface, double-fertilization processes, nitrate-responsive signaling, cis-regulatory DNA-binding activity, and cellular structures associated with the filiform apparatus and other extracellular interfaces (Figure 5, C4).

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) in galt octuple mutant flowers and siliques

To gain a broader, pathway-level understanding of these changes, we employed the gene set enrichment analysis to study the expression patterns of significantly differentially expressed genes in galt octuple mutant flowers and siliques using MapMan functional categorization (Figure 6). This approach allowed for the identification of entire predefined biological pathways that were systematically enriched for upregulation or downregulation across the full spectrum of gene expression, rather than focusing solely on genes exceeding a significance threshold. In the octuple mutant flowers, enriched downregulated categories included pentatricopeptide repeat-containing proteins, protein degradation (ubiquitin-related), PMEI proteins, cell wall organization, ribosomal proteins, and DNA synthesis/chromatin structure. Additional categories such as cell wall-modifying enzymes, biotic stress-related proteins, cell wall degradation, pectate lyases and polygalacturonase and genes linked to regulation of cell wall pectinesterases (Figure 6A) were also represented among the downregulated gene sets. Upregulated categories in the mutant flowers included many genes associated with signaling receptor kinases, particularly DUF26 domain kinases, WAK-like kinases, and LRK10-like kinases. Genes involved in glutathione transferases, transcription regulation, and hormone-responsive elements and peroxidases (Supplementary Table 1), were also enriched among the upregulated sets.

Figure 6
Bar charts showing gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) for galt octuple mutant flowers and siliques. Chart A displays gene counts in mutant flowers with categories like signaling and stress response. Chart B focuses on siliques with categories such as ribosomal and transcription regulation. Both charts indicate gene expression levels as “Down” and “Up”.

Figure 6. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showing enriched pathways and the number of genes involved in each gene set for flowers (A) and siliques (B). Genes related to RNA regulation, receptor kinases, cell wall modification, and stress response show significant transcriptional changes in galt octuple mutant flowers and siliques.

In siliques (Figure 6B), downregulated gene sets were dominated by cytosolic and ribosomal proteins, especially eukaryotic 40S and 60S subunits, along with genes related to histone core components, DNA synthesis, and RNA-binding proteins. Several stress-related and chromatin-associated gene sets also appeared in the downregulated list. Upregulated gene sets in siliques included those associated with secondary metabolism, embryogenesis, storage protein synthesis (Supplementary Table 2), lipid metabolism, and receptor kinase signaling (Table 3) pathways. Like flowers, siliques showed enrichment of DUF26 domain kinases, transcription factors (Supplementary Table 3), and transport-related proteins. These profiles indicate distinct patterns of gene category enrichment across the two reproductive organs.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. The upregulation of receptor kinase and wall associated kinase gene sets in flowers and siliques.

Expression of receptor kinase and wall-associated kinase gene sets

Gene set enrichment analysis (Figures 6A, B) showed the upregulation of receptor kinases and wall-associated kinases gene sets in the galt octuple mutant flowers and siliques (Table 3). However, within these gene sets, expression analysis (Table 3) revealed both upregulation and downregulation of specific genes belonging to receptor kinase and wall-associated kinase (WAK) families in the galt octuple mutant. In flowers, among the receptor kinases, CRK18 (AT4G23260) showed the highest upregulation with a log2FC of 3.20 and a padj of 4.82E-09, followed by ARCK1 (AT4G11890) at log2FC 2.68 (padj = 3.96E-08), and CRK14 (AT4G23220) at log2FC 2.49 (padj = 8.05E-14). Other moderately upregulated receptor kinases include CRK34 (log2FC = 1.20, padj = 0.0013) and EMB1290 (log2FC = 0.90, padj = 0.07). In contrast, a few receptor kinases were downregulated, including AT1G19090 (log2FC = -1.083, padj = 0.09) and AT4G28670 (log2FC = -0.895, padj = 0.29).

For the WAK gene set, several members were significantly upregulated. WAK1 (AT1G21250) and WAK2 (AT1G21270) displayed strong upregulation with log2FC values of 2.77 and 2.62, and padj values of 2.79E-19 and 7.69E-19, respectively. Other upregulated genes include WAKL10 (log2FC = 1.79, padj = 0.03), WAKL6 (log2FC = 1.01, padj = 1.46E-05), and AT5G66790 (log2FC = 1.45, padj = 0.049). A few WAK-related genes such as AT2G23450 (log2FC = -0.37, padj = 0.67) showed mild downregulation or no significant change. In Siliques, among the CRKs, CRK14 (AT4G23220) showed a strong upregulation (log2FC = 3.45, padj = 1.68E-06), alongside CRK15, CRK2, ARCK1, and CRK18, all exhibiting greater than 2-fold expression increases. Notably, EMB1290 (AT4G23250) was also upregulated (log2FC = 2.18, padj = 0.00023), suggesting a broader activation of DUF26-RLK signaling.

Similarly, genes encoding wall-associated kinases were markedly upregulated, with WAK3 (AT1G21240) and WAKL10 (AT1G79680) showing log2FC values of 4.45 (padj = 3.77E-05) and 6.16 (padj = 0.00039), respectively. Other significantly induced WAK family genes included WAK1, WAK2, WAKL2, and WAKL6, all with log2FC > 1.9 and padj < 0.01. These genes are known to mediate wall integrity sensing and signal transduction in response to biotic and mechanical triggers. The coordinated induction of CRKs and WAKs supports a model in which loss of AGP glycosylation activates cell surface surveillance systems, likely as a compensatory mechanism to maintain wall structure and stress responses during reproductive development.

Differential expression of cell wall organization genes in galt octuple mutant flowers

GSEA in flowers showed a significant downregulation of a cell wall organization gene set (Figure 6A), however, a mixed pattern of regulation was observed among the genes associated with cell wall organization of galt octuple mutant flowers, as revealed in Table 4. The most strongly downregulated genes included AT5G44840 (log2;FC = –7.02, padj = 1.58e-08), EXPB4 (AT2G45110, –5.97, 2.01e-06), and AT4G33840 (–4.48, 5.63e-09). Other members of the expansin family such as EXPA25 (AT5G39300, –3.76, 8.41e-22), EXPA23 (AT5G39280, –3.21, 2.85e-12), and EXPA16 (AT3G55500, –1.57, 0.000195) also showed reduced expression. The most strongly upregulated gene was PNP-A (AT2G18660, log2FC = 4.313, padj = 2.54e-48), followed by FUT4 (AT2G15390, 2.514, 0.019), COBL5 (AT5G60950, 2.47, 1.77e-12), and AGP5 (AT1G35230, 2.329, 1.34e-13). Additional upregulated genes included EXT3, XTR6, PMEPCRF, PGAZAT, EXLB1, COBL6, XTH19, AGP40, and LRX2, with fold changes between 1.06 and 2.23.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Genes involved with downregulated cell wall pathways in galt octuple mutant flowers.

Altered expression of genes involved in AGP glycosylation

Functional analysis of differentially expressed genes in galt octuple mutant flowers and siliques, using integrated annotations from the carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZy) database and Plant Gene Set annotation database (PlantGSAD), revealed a marked disruption in the expression of genes encoding enzymes responsible for AGP glycosylation. This highlights the central role of glycosyltransferases and other carbohydrate-active enzymes in maintaining AGP structure and function. Specifically, 26 glycosyltransferase-related genes were significantly downregulated in flowers and siliques (Table 5), including members of the GT31 family, which are known to catalyze the addition of galactose residues to hydroxyproline-rich protein backbones during AGP biosynthesis (Basu et al., 2015; Ogawa-Ohnishi and Matsubayashi, 2015). These changes extend beyond the GALT family to include both well-characterized and uncharacterized glycosyltransferases expressed during reproductive development. Notably, the expression of CAGE1 and CAGE2, two Golgi-localized glycosyltransferases implicated in both β-1,3-galactan synthesis and cellulose biosynthesis was markedly reduced, suggesting a broader impact on cell wall carbohydrate assembly (Nibbering et al., 2020, 2022). This is consistent with a study that have shown defects in galactosyltransferases resulted in reduced cellulose biosynthesis, which in causes cell wall defects (Nibbering et al., 2022)

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Differential regulation of AGP-related glycosyltransferases in galt octuple mutant flowers and siliques.

In addition, 11 genes belonging to the glycoside hydrolase (GH) family were upregulated (Supplementary Table 4) in both organs. While certain glycoside hydrolases (GH43 family) localized to the apoplast or Golgi have been shown to play a quality control role in AGP biosynthesis by removing aberrant β-1,3-galactan chains from growing glycans (Leszczuk et al., 2023; Nibbering et al., 2020; Tryfona et al., 2012), the GH19 family which was observed to be upregulated here are not directly linked to AGP synthesis and contains enzymes that are biochemically characterized as chitinases and lysozymes (Zhou et al., 2024). Many AGPs have been suspected to be substrates for chitinases (Showalter, 2001; van Hengel et al., 2001). These GH19 family enzymes are known to be associated with plant pathogenesis (Orlando et al., 2021).

Discussion

Impacts of transcriptional reprogramming on development and reproduction

Despite the knockout of eight primary galactosyltransferase genes (GALT2–GALT9), the octuple mutant remains viable, likely due to gene/enzymatic redundancy within the GT31 family or other uncharacterized glycosyltransferases, combined with extensive transcriptional reprogramming as identified in our RNA-seq data. The top significantly upregulated and downregulated genes in flowers and siliques of galt octuple mutants are summarized in Tables 1, 2, respectively. Common themes emerge across both tissues, highlighting the roles of AGPs in cell wall integrity, lipid signaling, chromatin remodeling, and defense responses. Downregulated genes in both tissues include FAD7 (AT3G11170), encoding fatty acid desaturase 7 crucial for trienoic fatty acid biosynthesis, membrane fluidity, and stress responses (McConn and Browse, 1996; Wickramanayake et al., 2020). This suggests that AGPs modulate lipid-derived signaling at the cell wall-plasma membrane interface, impacting pollen viability, silique expansion, and hormone pathways (He and Ding, 2020; Hoffmann et al., 2020; Qian et al., 2025). HMGA (AT1G14900), encoding a chromatin-associated protein (Reeves, 2001), is also repressed, implying reduced chromatin remodeling that hinders growth-associated gene expression (Vignali and Marracci, 2020). The downregulation of pectin methylesterase inhibitor genes (PMEIs, e.g., AT1G14890, AT4G15750, AT4G02330) may indicate disrupted pectin remodeling, leading to weakened cell wall integrity (Chebli and Geitmann, 2018; Wolf et al., 2009), expansion, and pathogen defense (Lionetti et al., 2007; Peaucelle et al., 2012; Pei et al., 2024; Wolf et al., 2009; Wormit and Usadel, 2018). Transcriptomic analyses reveal a marked downregulation of gene set critical for pollen tube elongation and successful fertilization. The reduced expression of these genes might have led to increased pectin demethylesterification and compromised wall structure during flower and silique development, supporting the hypothesis that AGPs interact with or co-regulate pectin-modifying enzymes, contributing to cell wall dynamics. Expansin genes (EXPA23, EXPA25) are downregulated in flowers, impairing cell wall loosening and growth processes, consistent with the established role of AGPs in cell expansion and development (Cosgrove, 2018). Multiple galactosyltransferase genes e.g., GALT7 (AT5G53340), GALT8 (AT4G32120), GALT3 (AT3G06440), GALT4 (AT1G27120) are repressed, confirming disrupted AGP glycosylation due to the mutation of the GALT genes (Zhang, 2009). Similarly, sks8 (AT1G21850), encoding a SKU5-similar protein with AGP-like features (Sedbrook et al., 2002), is strongly downregulated, highlighting the interconnectedness of glycosylated proteins in cell wall integrity and signaling. Additionally, genes encoding a beta-1,3-glucanase and a member of the glycoside hydroxylase family implicated in defense and remodeling of the callose matrix, and AT5G26220 are also downregulated, supporting the view that AGPs modulate not only wall structure but also influence developmental signaling peptides and enzymes involved in dynamic cell wall restructuring.

In flowers, the high upregulation of CRK4 (AT3G45860), RLP23, and RLP38, encoding receptor-like kinases and proteins involved in pathogen perception, indicates enhanced surveillance and stress signaling. This may reflect attempts to reestablish floral developmental balance via stress-related transcriptional reprogramming (Cui et al., 2022). The upregulation of the expression of calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) and calmodulin-binding proteins, key components of calcium-mediated signaling cascades, implicates a broader regulatory role for AGPs in coordinating pollen tube guidance and fertilization. These findings align with previous reports that highlight calcium as a central second messenger in plant reproduction, where spatial and temporal oscillations in calcium levels, decoded by CDPKs and calmodulin complexes, are essential for proper pollen tube navigation and sperm delivery (Steinhorst and Kudla, 2013; Yang et al., 2021). RLP23 is known to mediate immunity by recognizing pathogen-derived peptides (Albert et al., 2015), suggesting that AGPs may normally suppress or buffer immune responses under non-stressed conditions. Other upregulated genes, such as CHI (AT2G43570) and PR5 (AT1G75040), encode pathogenesis-related proteins involved in fungal resistance and defense priming. Their increased expression indicates that AGPs may modulate immune homeostasis, and that galt mutants exhibit a heightened defense response with the reduced glycosylation in AGPs. The upregulation of PNP-A (AT2G18660), encoding a signaling peptide with natriuretic activity, reflects broader physiological stress responses, potentially mimicking pathogen attack or osmotic imbalance (Turek et al., 2014). The upregulation of AT3G47480, encoding a calcium-binding EF-hand protein, further links the AGP network to calcium signaling and cell wall integrity sensing (Lamport and Várnai, 2013). Additionally, AT2G29120, AT5G10760, and AT5G55450 are also upregulated, suggesting a complex interplay of signaling pathways in response to AGP deficiency. On the other hand, the upregulation of the boric acid transporter gene NIP5;1 may reflect an adaptive response to preserve cell wall integrity under conditions of impaired glycosylation. Recent studies emphasize that boron’s most clearly established structural role is in cross-linking the pectic polysaccharide rhamnogalacturonan-II (RG-II) via borate diester bridges, which are critical for maintaining cell wall architecture and proper plant development (Chu et al., 2025; Matthes et al., 2020). In vitro studies demonstrate that RG-II dimerization via boron is otherwise inefficient without chaperone activity, a role recently attributed to specific AGPs such as AGP31 and its histidine-rich peptides (Sanhueza et al., 2022). NIP5;1 is localized to the plasma membrane and its expression is rapidly upregulated in response to boron deficiency, functioning to facilitate boric acid influx into developing tissues (Matthes et al., 2020). Therefore, enhanced NIP5;1 expression in reproductive structures may represent a feedback mechanism aiming to rescue boron-mediated processes such as RG-II cross-linking, whose disruption compromises cell expansion, cell division, and tissue morphogenesis.

In siliques, the upregulation of AT4G35690, encoding a DUF241 domain-containing protein, hints at the activation of poorly characterized or novel stress-responsive mechanisms. Likewise, GDSL-like lipase gene (AT2G36325), involved with the catalysis of acyltransfer or hydrolase reactions with lipid and non-lipid substrates, and the alpha/beta-hydrolase gene (AT1G68620), associated with lipid and cuticle integrity, are upregulated. CEP2, ILA (AT1G64790), and GASA1, which are associated with proteolysis, immune signaling, and cell elongation, respectively, potentially represent compensatory pathways to mitigate the loss of AGP function (Bauer et al., 2021; Hierl et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2022). NAP (AT1G69490), encoding a NAC transcription factor involved in senescence and downstream of floral organ identity genes (Guo and Gan, 2006), is also upregulated, suggesting that AGP dysfunction might accelerate developmental transitions or trigger premature tissue maturation. The induction of HB21 (AT2G18550), a homeobox gene involved in growth repression, further supports this hypothesis. ATPMEPCRB (AT4G02330), another PMEI-like gene, is also upregulated, which is notable given the downregulation of similar family members in the same tissue, suggesting a potential divergence in PMEI function or spatial regulation of pectin-related enzymes in siliques. Finally, the upregulation of AT4G18425, encoding a protein with a DUF1680 domain, and AT3G22600, encoding the bifunctional inhibitor/lipid-transfer protein (AT3G22600), suggest complex changes in hormone metabolism, signaling, and lipid transport, potentially reflecting altered cell-cell communication and resource allocation in developing siliques. Altogether, these findings reinforce the idea that AGPs, via their glycosylation and localization in the extracellular matrix mediate crosstalk between development, metabolism, and defense. In siliques, where tissue differentiation and seed maturation occur, the disruption of AGP glycosylation leads to profound transcriptional changes, particularly in genes associated with cell wall metabolism, lipid signaling, and developmental regulation.

Cluster-based analysis reveals organ-specific compensatory and defense strategies

Cluster 1 comprised genes predominantly downregulated in siliques and enriched for salicylic acid-mediated signaling, bacterial defense response, and inter-organismal communication at the biological level, alongside RNA polymerase II-specific transcriptional regulators and proteins localized to the photosystem and extracellular space. The simultaneous repression of immune signaling, transcriptional activation, and chloroplast-associated localization suggests a broad suppression of basal defense readiness and stress-responsive gene networks in siliques of the galt octuple mutant. Given the reported role of AGPs in cell wall-associated immune perception and hormone modulation, their altered glycosylation may attenuate wall-derived signaling cues, leading to a muted salicylic acid defense program and reduced chloroplast-to-nucleus communication (Basu et al., 2016; Přerovská et al., 2022). This coordinated downregulation reflects a silique-specific vulnerability where the loss of AGP function compromises both extracellular defense and plastid-associated stress response systems.

Cluster 2 contained genes predominantly upregulated in silique and downregulated in flower tissue and enriched for biological processes related to pollen-pistil interaction, pathogen defense, and cytotoxicity, alongside molecular functions involved in ion transport, including proton-exporting and symporter activities, and localization to the extracellular region. These signatures point to a silique-specific activation of ion-flux–driven signaling at the cell surface, a mechanism that can simultaneously facilitate nutrient mobilization for developing seeds and strengthen outward-facing defense barriers (Zuo et al., 2025). The concurrent repression of the same repertoire in flowers suggests that, in the absence of properly glycosylated AGPs, floral tissues dampen costly cytotoxic and transporter programs, possibly to avoid self-incompatibility or oxidative damage, whereas siliques compensate by escalating extracellular surveillance and transport capacity. Such organ-opposite regulation is consistent with reports that AGP perturbation can differentially modulate receptor-like kinase signaling, ion gradients, and cell-cell recognition during reproduction (Foubert-Mendes et al., 2025; Pereira et al., 2016), indicating the context-dependent strategies plants deploy to maintain reproductive success and pathogen resistance when cell wall glycoprotein integrity is compromised.

Cluster 3 gene sets were activated in flowers and repressed in siliques, and their enrichment profile centers on abiotic-stress perception (water deprivation, oxidative and hormonal cues), antioxidant and peroxidase activities, and localization to the nuclear CCAAT-binding factor complex. The flower-specific upregulation of this redox-detoxification module suggests that floral tissue mounts a nucleus-driven oxidative-stress program to compensate for AGP-linked cell wall defects, whereas siliques suppress the same circuitry, perhaps relying instead on alternative, nutrient-focused defenses noted in other clusters. Such organ-opposite deployment of ROS-buffering genes echoes observations that AGP perturbations elicit context-dependent redox signaling, with floral organs often exhibiting heightened oxidative control to safeguard reproductive viability (Padhiar et al., 2025; Zinta et al., 2016).

Cluster 4 contains functional gene sets upregulated in both siliques and flowers, with top enrichment for protein localization to the cell surface, double-fertilization, and nitrate-responsive signaling, alongside cis-regulatory DNA-binding activities and products targeted to the filiform apparatus and other extracellular interfaces. This profile indicates a concerted effort to bolster reproductive nutrient exchange and cell-to-cell communication in response to altered AGP glycosylation, likely ensuring that gamete recognition and nutrient allocation proceed despite impaired cell wall glycoprotein architecture, a role consistent with the involvement of AGPs in pollen-tube guidance and extracellular signal presentation (Foubert-Mendes et al., 2025; Pereira et al., 2016).

Reduction of glycosylation by the disruption of galactosylation induces transcriptional reprogramming that alters major pathways critical for cellular function.

In flowers, the downregulated gene set notably includes 406 genes related to pentatricopeptide repeat-containing proteins, which are critical for RNA editing and organellar gene expression. Furthermore, 76 genes involved in biotic stress responses and plant defensins were suppressed, highlighting a potential compromise in innate immunity. Among the downregulated genes, 62 encode pectin methylesterase inhibitor (PMEI) proteins, which are crucial for regulating cell wall structure during reproduction. PMEIs inhibit the activity of pectin methylesterases (PMEs) by binding to them, thereby controlling the demethylesterification of homogalacturonan, a major component of pectin. This regulation is essential for the proper development of the intine layer, pollen germination, and pollen tube growth (Paynel et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2010). A decrease in the expression of pectin methylesterase inhibitors (PMEIs) in siliques also may disrupt the balance of pectin modifications and potentially enhance pectin degradation and compromise cell adhesion during seed development (Okawa et al., 2023). Moreover, the significant downregulation of flavonoid biosynthesis genes, which influence pollen viability and anther dehiscence (Xu et al., 2015), provides an additional explanation for the observed fertility defects in the galt octuple mutants. The smaller siliques and reduced seed set observed the galt octuple mutant correlate with transcriptomic changes affecting suspensor development and early embryo formation. Downregulation of suspensor-specific genes, which are critical for nutrient transport to the developing embryo (Liu et al., 2015), likely contribute to compromised seed viability.

In addition, 52 genes associated with cell wall synthesis and modification were repressed, including expansins and structural glycoproteins, suggesting impaired cell wall remodeling. Genes encoding polygalacturonases (PGs) and pectate lyase-like proteins (PLLs) were also among those downregulated. PGs catalyze the hydrolysis of demethylesterified pectin by cleaving the links between the polymers that make up the cell wall, altering its extensibility and cell-cell adhesion (Kim et al., 2006). This process is important for pollen wall development, pollen tube growth and seed germination (Hadfield and Bennett, 1998; Sander et al., 2001). An alteration in the expression of these PGs can lead to a lack of coordination of cell wall loosening, which in turn affects associated developmental processes. Also, PLLs degrade pectin via β-elimination in a Ca2+-dependent manner. During pollen germination, PLLs play a key role in loosening the intine layer and facilitating pollen tube emergence (Chebli and Geitmann, 2018). These changes further support a role for AGP glycosylation in reproductive wall integrity. Indeed, future biochemical analysis of the changes in pectin in specific tissues would provide a better understanding of such AGP-pectin interactions. Also suppressed were 67 GDSL-motif lipase genes, many of which contribute to lipid remodeling and defense, 41 glutaredoxin-related redox genes, and 47 genes encoding pectin esterases, underscoring the widespread alterations in wall biogenesis, signaling, and redox homeostasis.

In contrast, the upregulated gene set reveals a notable shift toward signaling and defense-related transcriptional programs in both flowers and siliques, indicative of a compensatory response to compromised AGP glycosylation. Among these, 30 DUF26 domain-containing receptor-like kinases (RLKs) were significantly induced. DUF26-RLKs, also known as cysteine-rich receptor-like kinases (CRKs), are implicated in reactive oxygen species (ROS) sensing, immune activation, and stress adaptation (Wrzaczek et al., 2013). These proteins often function at the cell surface to perceive extracellular cues and relay stress or pathogen-associated signals to intracellular pathways. Their upregulation suggests heightened surveillance and potential compensatory reinforcement of defense signaling networks in the galt mutant. This suggests that the mutant is experiencing heightened stress, possibly as a compensatory mechanism for impaired development.

Also elevated were 16 wall-associated receptor kinases (WAKs). WAKs are pivotal in cell wall integrity sensing, acting as transducers that bind pectin fragments and initiate downstream responses related to growth, development, and pathogen resistance (Brutus et al., 2010; Kohorn and Kohorn, 2012). The increased expression of WAK genes aligns with the hypothesis that perturbation of AGP glycosylation compromises the mechanical or biochemical properties of the cell wall, thereby activating wall integrity surveillance pathways (Kohorn, 2016). Additionally, 9 Wheat LRK10-like RLKs (LRK10L-RLKs) were significantly upregulated. Originally characterized in wheat as genes involved in leaf rust resistance, LRK10L-RLKs in Arabidopsis and other dicots have been associated with broad-spectrum disease resistance, abiotic stress responses, and regulation of root and shoot development (Chern et al., 2001; Shiu and Bleecker, 2001). Their upregulation in galt octuple mutant flowers suggests a link between AGP function and broader receptor-mediated immunity and developmental robustness. Together, the induction of DUF26-RLKs, WAKs, and LRK10L-RLKs reflects an active reprogramming of the cell’s extracellular sensing and defense machinery. This pattern underscores the importance of AGPs not only as structural components of the wall matrix but also as modulators of receptor availability, ligand presentation, and cell surface signaling fidelity. Furthermore, we observed the induction of 46 glutathione transferase (GST) genes, 54 genes associated with redox ascorbate and glutathione pathways, and 52 peroxidase genes (Supplementary Table 1), indicates an attempt to mitigate oxidative damage and maintain cellular homeostasis (Gadjev et al., 2006), reflecting enhanced oxidative stress responses likely triggered by disruptions in cell wall and glycoprotein integrity. Strong upregulation of multiple receptor kinases and genes involved in signal transduction, redox homeostasis, and peroxidases, indicates activation of stress and wall integrity sensing pathways (Brutus et al., 2010; Chern et al., 2001; Kohorn and Kohorn, 2012; Wrzaczek et al., 2013).

Cell wall organization and integrity

The gene set enrichment analysis of the galt mutant flowers show the downregulation of genes associated with cell wall organization, including key structural and regulatory components such as EXPA25 and EXPA16 (expansins) which are known to disrupt the non-covalent bonding between cellulose microfibrils and matrix glucans in order to allow cell wall loosening and extension. We also identified PMEPCRF which is a pectin methylesterase inhibitor, and XTH19 (a xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase). Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolases (XTHs) facilitate the breakdown of xyloglucan polymers internally, while simultaneously incorporating new xyloglucan polysaccharides into the cell wall. This dual action helps in maintaining the cell wall’s thickness and structural integrity during cell elongation and organ growth (Cosgrove, 2018; Rose et al., 2002; Yokoyama and Nishitani, 2004). This widespread repression suggests that proper AGP glycosylation is essential for maintaining the transcriptional programs required for dynamic cell wall modulation, which is crucial to plant growth and development.

Gene ontology enrichment analysis of the commonly upregulated genes revealed a coordinated activation of stress-related biological processes, including responses to bacteria, external stimuli, and oxidative challenges, alongside the upregulation of molecular functions such as kinase activity, calcium ion binding, and phosphotransferase activity. These changes might indicate a shift toward a defense-primed physiological state, as plants often activate kinase-mediated signaling cascades and redox-responsive pathways in response to compromised cell wall integrity (Baez et al., 2022; Narváez-Barragán et al., 2022). The co-enrichment of carbohydrate- and polysaccharide-binding domains also suggests increased surveillance of cell wall status, consistent with previously reported compensatory signaling upon AGP deficiency (Hromadová et al., 2021).

AGPs modulate cell wall plasticity and architecture by interacting with pectins, hemicelluloses, and structural proteins, as well as by influencing signal transduction cascades (Seifert, 2021; Showalter and Basu, 2016). The observed suppression of wall-modifying genes likely reflects the absence of AGP-mediated signaling cues that normally promote wall loosening and extension, particularly in reproductive tissues where cell wall remodeling is critical. For instance, reduced expansin expression may contribute to compromised silique elongation and ovule penetration (Tan et al., 2024), phenotypes characteristic of the octuple mutant (Kaur et al., 2023; Moreira et al., 2024). Despite this general downregulation, of note is the upregulation of genes such as the FUT4 glycosyltransferase. FUT4 is responsible for adding terminal fucose residues to the galactan side chains of AGPs (Tryfona et al., 2012, 2014). In galt mutants, the initial galactosylation of hydroxyproline residues is severely impaired, resulting in truncated AG polysaccharide chains. As a result, substrates for FUT4 are largely missing or reduced. The observed upregulation of FUT4 may therefore represent a compensatory, rather than restorative transcriptional response to perceived defects in glycoprotein maturation or cell wall structure. The induction of AGP40, AGP5, LRX2, EXT3, and COBL5 may also reflect compensatory or stress-induced responses to wall perturbation. Proteins such as LRX2, a leucine-rich repeat extensin-like protein, play important roles in maintaining wall integrity and mechanosensing during root hair development (Borassi et al., 2020). Extensins like EXT3 contribute to wall strength and architecture (Lamport et al., 2011), while COBL5 participates in cellulose microfibril organization essential for anisotropic growth. These genes are typically activated in conditions of mechanical disturbance or wall perturbation, supporting the hypothesis that AGPs function not only as structural elements but also as sensors of cell wall integrity (Nguema-Ona et al., 2013). These findings position AGPs as central regulators of wall-associated transcriptional networks. Their glycosylation status appears to dictate the balance between wall extensibility and rigidity by shaping gene expression responses to developmental and environmental cues. They function in the loosening and remodeling of the cell wall for growth and development.

The role of AGP glycosylation in plant development provides insight to the mechanism of action of AGPs

Figure 7 summarizes the integrated transcriptomic response to AGP hypoglycosylation. Rather than a mechanistic model, it serves as a conceptual framework highlighting key pathways, glycosylation, signaling, and stress responses, altered in galt mutants. Proper AGP function begins with the hydroxyproline-rich protein backbone synthesized in the ER (Showalter, 2001; (Hijazi et al., 2014), followed by essential glycosylation catalyzed by galactosyltransferases (GALTs), mainly from the GT31 family. This large carbohydrate moiety provides the intermolecular surface for AGPs to maintain cell wall integrity and mediate calcium signaling and cell-to-cell communication at the cell surface. Properly glycosylated AGPs contribute directly to cell wall integrity and remodeling by interacting with pectin, cellulose, and other wall matrix components (Ellis et al., 2010; Tan et al., 2013). AGPs also serve as scaffolds that organize wall architecture and support wall extensibility, especially during reproductive development (Nguema-Ona et al., 2012; Pereira et al., 2016). These glycosylated AGPs are involved in calcium signaling and cell-to-cell communication, possibly acting as calcium capacitors that modulate cytosolic calcium levels, a key secondary messenger in plant development and stress signaling (Lamport et al., 2018; Lamport and Várnai, 2013). Their role at the cell surface, as well as their carbohydrate side chains allows them to integrate external signals (Lin et al., 2022) and regulate cellular processes through interactions with plasma membrane proteins, including receptor kinases. The loss of the eight GALT genesdisrupts this glycosylation, which triggers widespread transcriptional reprogramming. This defective glycosylation results in the significant downregulation of genes critical for growth and reproduction, including those for PMEIs, cell wall organization, and flavonoid biosynthesis. Simultaneously, the plant activates compensatory pathways by strongly upregulating components of stress and wall integrity sensing, particularly multiple receptor kinases. The ultimate downstream consequence of this disruption and compensatory signaling is stress, fertility defects, and growth impairments observed in the mutants (Kaur et al., 2023; Moreira et al., 2024).

Figure 7
Flowchart showing the effects of galactosyltransferases knockout on AGPs. The left path illustrates normal progression from a hydroxyproline-rich AGP backbone to developmental regulation, ending with plant defense response. The right path shows defective glycosylation leading to transcriptional reprogramming, involving various cellular processes like glycosylation, PMEIs, and receptor kinases. It culminates in stress, fertility defects, and growth issues.

Figure 7. A pathway summary showing pathways associated with arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) function. This figure demonstrates that proper glycosylation of AGPs is crucial for cell wall integrity and remodeling, leading to calcium signaling, cell-to-cell communication, developmental regulation, and plant defense responses. Conversely, a knock-out of galactosyltransferases results in defective glycosylation of AGPs, triggering transcriptional reprogramming that impacts various cellular processes, ultimately leading to stress, defects in fertility, and growth defects.

This study strengthens the view that AGPs are integrative components of cell wall architecture and receptor-mediated signaling pathways. Their galactosylation is crucial for the initiation and proper glycosylation of AGPs, which in turn appears to be essential for proper gene regulation across multiple developmental programs. These findings provide a foundation for future functional studies on specific AGP-receptor interactions and highlights glycosylation as a critical layer of post-translational control in cell wall-mediated signaling and development. Overall, our findings collectively advance the understanding of the mechanism of action of AGPs by demonstrating their central role in coordinating developmental signaling, structural integrity, and stress responsiveness in reproductive tissues. AGPs are not merely structural glycoproteins but dynamic mediators of gene regulation, wall remodeling, and extracellular signal integration. Their glycosylation status directly impacts transcriptional networks essential for plant reproductive development and stress adaptation. To further uncover their mechanism of action, future studies should prioritize identifying specific AGP-interacting partners, such as receptor-like kinases, wall-modifying enzymes, and signaling molecules, to biochemically define the precise molecular interfaces through which AGPs influence cell fate, morphogenesis, and stress responses. Finally, while our transcriptomic data indicates strong associations between AGP glycosylation defects and altered pathways, these findings are largely correlative, and further studies with less severe mutants or additional time points may also help to elucidate direct interactions.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, PRJNA1338983.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by The ethics committee Hebei general hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

DA: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GO: Data curation, Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing, Validation. AS: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. We gratefully acknowledge the research funding provided by Ohio University through a Student Enhancement Award grant, a College of Arts and Sciences grant, an OURC Baker award, and a NQPI Student Fellowship (https://www.ohio.edu/cas/nqpi). We also appreciate Dr Oyeyemi Ajayi for reviewing this manuscript and providing helpful feedback.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. Generative AI was used to correct grammar and organize writing.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1706954/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1 | Functional enrichment analysis of shared and organ-specific differentially expressed genes in galt octuple mutant flowers and siliques was performed with respect to biological processes (B in red) and molecular functions (M in red). (A) Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis for the 12 genes downregulated in flowers but upregulated in siliques. (B) Enrichment analysis for the 7 genes upregulated in flower but downregulated in silique tissues. The size of the nodes indicates the number of genes contributing to that enrichment pathway from the dataset while the connecting lines indicate the co-interaction of the pathways. The darker the lines, the stronger the interactions. Node interaction was generated by ShinyGO v.0.86 (Ge et al., 2020).

References

Albert, I., Böhm, H., Albert, M., Feiler, C. E., Imkampe, J., Wallmeroth, N., et al. (2015). An RLP23–SOBIR1–BAK1 complex mediates NLP-triggered immunity. Nat. Plants 1, 15140. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.140

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Andrés, F., Kinoshita, A., Kalluri, N., Fernández, V., Falavigna, V. S., Cruz, T. M. D., et al. (2020). The sugar transporter SWEET10 acts downstream of FLOWERING LOCUS T during floral transition of arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 20, 53. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-2266-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Baez, L. A., Tichá, T., and Hamann, T. (2022). Cell wall integrity regulation across plant species. Plant Mol. Biol. 109, 483–504. doi: 10.1007/s11103-022-01284-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Basu, D., Tian, L., Debrosse, T., Poirier, E., Emch, K., Herock, H., et al. (2016). Glycosylation of a fasciclin-like arabinogalactan-protein (SOS5) mediates root growth and seed mucilage adherence via a cell wall receptor-like kinase (FEI1/FEI2) pathway in arabidopsis. PloS One 11, e0145092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145092

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Basu, D., Wang, W., Ma, S., DeBrosse, T., Poirier, E., Emch, K., et al. (2015). Two hydroxyproline galactosyltransferases, GALT5 and GALT2, function in arabinogalactan-protein glycosylation, growth and development in arabidopsis. PloS One 10, e0125624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125624

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bauer, S., Mekonnen, D. W., Hartmann, M., Yildiz, I., Janowski, R., Lange, B., et al. (2021). UGT76B1, A promiscuous hub of small molecule-based immune signaling, glucosylates N-hydroxypipecolic acid, and balances plant immunity. Plant Cell 33, 714–734. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koaa044

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Borassi, C., Gloazzo Dorosz, J., Ricardi, M. M., Carignani Sardoy, M., Pol Fachin, L., Marzol, E., et al. (2020). A cell surface arabinogalactan-peptide influences root hair cell fate. New Phytol. 227, 732–743. doi: 10.1111/nph.16487

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bossy, A., Blaschek, W., and Classen, B. (2009). Characterization and immunolocalization of arabinogalactan-proteins in roots of eChinacea purpurea. Planta Med. 75, 1526–1533. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1185801

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Brutus, A., Sicilia, F., Macone, A., Cervone, F., and De Lorenzo, G. (2010). A domain swap approach reveals a role of the plant wall-associated kinase 1 (WAK1) as A receptor of oligogalacturonides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 9452–9457. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000675107

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chebli, Y. and Geitmann, A. (2018). FRAP experiments show pectate lyases promote pollen germination and lubricate the path of the pollen tube in arabidopsis thaliana. Microscop Microanal 24, 1376–1377. doi: 10.1017/S1431927618007365

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chern, M. S., Fitzgerald, H. A., Yadav, R. C., Canlas, P. E., Dong, X., and Ronald, P. C. (2001). Evidence for a disease-resistance pathway in rice similar to the NPR1-mediated signaling pathway in arabidopsis. Plant J: For Cell Mol. Biol. 27, 101–113. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01070.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chu, L., Schäfer, C. C., and Matthes, M. S. (2025). Molecular mechanisms affected by boron deficiency in root and shoot meristems of plants. J. Exp. Bot. 76 (7), 1866–1878. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraf036

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cosgrove, D. J. (2018). Diffuse growth of plant cell walls. Plant Physiol. 176, 16–27. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01541

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cui, Y., Lu, X., and Gou, X. (2022). Receptor-like protein kinases in plant reproduction: current understanding and future perspectives. Plant Commun. 3, 100273. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2021.100273

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dilokpimol, A., Poulsen, C. P., Vereb, G., Kaneko, S., Schulz, A., and Geshi, N. (2014). Galactosyltransferases from arabidopsis thaliana in the biosynthesis of type II arabinogalactan: molecular interaction enhances enzyme activity. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-90

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Di Marzo, M., Babolin, N., Viana, V. E., De Oliveira, A. C., Gugi, B., Caporali, E., et al. (2022). The genetic control of SEEDSTICK and LEUNIG-HOMOLOG in seed and fruit development: new insights into cell wall control. Plants 11, 3146. doi: 10.3390/plants11223146

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dolan, L., Linstead, P., and Roberts, K. (1995). An AGP epitope distinguishes a central metaxylem initial from other vascular initials in the arabidopsis root. Protoplasma 189, 149–155. doi: 10.1007/BF01280168

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Doughty, J., Aljabri, M., and Scott, R. J. (2014). Flavonoids and the regulation of seed size in arabidopsis. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 42, 364–369. doi: 10.1042/BST20140040

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ellis, M., Egelund, J., Schultz, C. J., and Bacic, A. (2010). Arabinogalactan-proteins: key regulators at the cell surface? Plant Physiol. 153, 403–419. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.156000

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Foubert-Mendes, S., Silva, J., Ferreira, M. J., Pereira, L. G., and Coimbra, S. (2025). A review on the function of arabinogalactan-proteins during pollen grain development. Plant Reprod. 38, 8. doi: 10.1007/s00497-024-00515-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gadjev, I., Vanderauwera, S., Gechev, T. S., Laloi, C., Minkov, I. N., Shulaev, V., et al. (2006). Transcriptomic footprints disclose specificity of reactive oxygen species signaling in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 141, 436–445. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.078717

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ge, S. X., Jung, D., and Yao, R. (2020). ShinyGO: a graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics. 36 (8), 2628–2629. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz931

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ge, S. X., Son, E. W., and Yao, R. (2018). iDEP: an integrated web application for differential expression and pathway analysis of RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinf. 19, 534. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2486-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, Y. and Gan, S. (2006). AtNAP, A NAC family transcription factor, has an important role in leaf senescence. Plant J: For Cell Mol. Biol. 46, 601–612. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02723.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hadfield, K. A. and Bennett, A. B. (1998). Polygalacturonases: many genes in search of a function. Plant Physiol. 117, 337–343. doi: 10.1104/pp.117.2.337

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Haruta, M., Gray, W. M., and Sussman, M. R. (2015). Regulation of the plasma membrane proton pump (H(+)-atpase) by phosphorylation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 28, 68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.09.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

He, M. and Ding, N.-Z. (2020). Plant unsaturated fatty acids: multiple roles in stress response. Front. Plant Sci. 11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.562785

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Herrera-Ubaldo, H. and De Folter, S. (2022). Gynoecium and fruit development in arabidopsis. Development 149, dev200120. doi: 10.1242/dev.200120

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hierl, G., Höwing, T., Isono, E., Lottspeich, F., and Gietl, C. (2014). Ex vivo processing for maturation of arabidopsis KDEL-tailed cysteine endopeptidase 2 (Atcep2) pro-enzyme and its storage in endoplasmic reticulum derived organelles. Plant Mol. Biol. 84, 605–620. doi: 10.1007/s11103-013-0157-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hijazi, M., Velasquez, S. M., Jamet, E., Estevez, J. M., and Albenne, C. (2014). An update on post-translational modifications of hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins: toward a model highlighting their contribution to plant cell wall architecture. Front Plant Sci. 5, 395. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00395

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoffmann, R. D., Portes, M. T., Olsen, L. I., Damineli, D. S. C., Hayashi, M., Nunes, C. O., et al. (2020). Plasma membrane H+-atpases sustain pollen tube growth and fertilization. Nat. Commun. 11, 2395. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16253-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hromadová, D., Soukup, A., and Tylová, E. (2021). Arabinogalactan proteins in plant roots – an update on possible functions. Front. Plant Sci. 12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.674010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ito, S., Suzuki, Y., Miyamoto, K., Ueda, J., and Yamaguchi, I. (2005). AtFLA11, a fasciclin-like arabinogalactan-protein, specifically localized in screlenchyma cells. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 69, 1963–1969. doi: 10.1271/bbb.69.1963

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaur, D., Held, M. A., Zhang, Y., Moreira, D., Coimbra, S., and Showalter, A. M. (2023). Knockout of eight hydroxyproline-O-galactosyltransferases cause multiple vegetative and reproductive growth defects. Cell Surface 10, 100117. doi: 10.1016/j.tcsw.2023.100117

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kawashima, T. and Goldberg, R. B. (2010). The suspensor: not just suspending the embryo. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keegstra, K. (2010). Plant cell walls. Plant Physiol. 154, 483–486. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.161240

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, J., Shiu, S.-H., Thoma, S., Li, W.-H., and Patterson, S. E. (2006). Patterns of expansion and expression divergence in the plant polygalacturonase gene family. Genome Biol. 7, R87. doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-9-r87

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kohorn, B. D. (2016). Cell wall-associated kinases and pectin perception. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 489–494. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv467

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kohorn, B. D. and Kohorn, S. L. (2012). The cell wall-associated kinases, waks, as pectin receptors. Front. Plant Sci. 3. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00088

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lamport, D. T. A., Kieliszewski, M. J., Chen, Y., and Cannon, M. C. (2011). Role of the extensin superfamily in primary cell wall architecture. Plant Physiol. 156, 11–19. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.169011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lamport, D. T. A., Tan, L., Held, M. A., and Kieliszewski, M. J. (2018). Pollen tube growth and guidance: occam’s razor sharpened on a molecular arabinogalactan glycoprotein rosetta stone. New Phytol. 217, 491–500. doi: 10.1111/nph.14845

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lamport, D. T. A. and Várnai, P. (2013). Periplasmic arabinogalactan glycoproteins act as a calcium capacitor that regulates plant growth and development. New Phytol. 197, 58–64. doi: 10.1111/nph.12005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Leszczuk, A., Kalaitzis, P., Blazakis, K. N., and Zdunek, A. (2020). The role of arabinogalactan proteins (Agps) in fruit ripening—A review. Horticult Res. 7, 176. doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-00397-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Leszczuk, A., Kalaitzis, P., Kulik, J., and Zdunek, A. (2023). Review: structure and modifications of arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs). BMC Plant Biol. 23, 45. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04066-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, S., Miao, Y., Huang, H., Zhang, Y., Huang, L., and Cao, J. (2022). Arabinogalactan proteins: focus on the role in cellulose synthesis and deposition during plant cell wall biogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 6578. doi: 10.3390/ijms23126578

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lionetti, V., Raiola, A., Camardella, L., Giovane, A., Obel, N., Pauly, M., et al. (2007). Overexpression of pectin methylesterase inhibitors in arabidopsis restricts fungal infection by botrytis cinerea. Plant Physiol. 143, 1871–1880. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.090803

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Li, X., Zhao, J., Tang, X., Tian, S., Chen, J., et al. (2015). Direct evidence that suspensor cells have embryogenic potential that is suppressed by the embryo proper during normal embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States America 112, 12432–12437. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508651112

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, E., MacMillan, C. P., Shafee, T., Ma, Y., Ratcliffe, J., Van De Meene, A., et al. (2020). Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan-protein 16 (FLA16) is required for stem development in arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.615392

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, L., Liu, X., Lv, W., and Yang, Y. (2022). Molecular mechanisms of plant responses to salt stress. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.934877

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

MacMillan, C. P., Mansfield, S. D., Stachurski, Z. H., Evans, R., and Southerton, S. G. (2010). Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins: specialization for stem biomechanics and cell wall architecture in arabidopsis and eucalyptus: flas specialized for stem biomechanics and cell walls. Plant J. 62, 689–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04181.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mareri, L., Romi, M., and Cai, G. (2019). Arabinogalactan proteins: actors or spectators during abiotic and biotic stress in plants? Plant Biosyst. - Int. J. Dealing All Aspects Plant Biol. 153, 173–185. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2018.1473525

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Matthes, M. S., Robil, J. M., and McSteen, P. (2020). From element to development: the power of the essential micronutrient boron to shape morphological processes in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 71, 1681–1693. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa042

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

McConn, M. and Browse, J. (1996). The critical requirement for linolenic acid is pollen development, not photosynthesis, in an arabidopsis mutant. Plant Cell 8 (3), 403–416. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.3.403

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Moreira, D., Kaur, D., Fourbert-Mendes, S., Showalter, A. M., Coimbra, S., and Pereira, A. M. (2024). Eight hydroxyproline-O-galactosyltransferases play essential roles in female reproductive development. Plant Sci: Int. J. Exp. Plant Biol. 348, 112231. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2024.112231

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Moreira, D., Kaur, D., Pereira, A. M., Held, M. A., Showalter, A. M., and Coimbra, S. (2023). Type II arabinogalactans initiated by hydroxyproline-O-galactosyltransferases play important roles in pollen–pistil interactions. Plant J. 114, 371–389. doi: 10.1111/tpj.16141

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mulet, J. M., Campos, F., and Yenush, L. (2020). Editorial: ion homeostasis in plant stress and development. Front. Plant Sci. 11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.618273

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Narváez-Barragán, D. A., Tovar-Herrera, O. E., Guevara-García, A., Serrano, M., and Martinez-Anaya, C. (2022). Mechanisms of plant cell wall surveillance in response to pathogens, cell wall-derived ligands and the effect of expansins to infection resistance or susceptibility. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.969343

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nguema-Ona, E., Coimbra, S., Vicre-Gibouin, M., Mollet, J.-C., and Driouich, A. (2012). Arabinogalactan proteins in root and pollen-tube cells: distribution and functional aspects. Ann. Bot. 110, 383–404. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs143

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nguema-Ona, E., Vicré-Gibouin, M., Cannesan, M.-A., and Driouich, A. (2013). Arabinogalactan proteins in root–microbe interactions. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 440–449. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.03.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nibbering, P., Castilleux, R., Wingsle, G., and Niittylä, T. (2022). CAGES are golgi-localized GT31 enzymes involved in cellulose biosynthesis in arabidopsis. Plant J. 110, 1271–1285. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15734

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nibbering, P., Petersen, B. L., Motawia, M. S., Jørgensen, B., Ulvskov, P., and Niittylä, T. (2020). Golgi-localized exo-β1,3-galactosidases involved in cell expansion and root growth in arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 10581–10592. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.013878

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ogawa-Ohnishi, M. and Matsubayashi, Y. (2015). Identification of three potent hydroxyproline O -galactosyltransferases in arabidopsis. Plant J. 81, 736–746. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12764

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Okawa, R., Hayashi, Y., Yamashita, Y., Matsubayashi, Y., and Ogawa-Ohnishi, M. (2023). Arabinogalactan protein polysaccharide chains are required for normal biogenesis of plasmodesmata. Plant J. 113, 493–503. doi: 10.1111/tpj.16061

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Olanrewaju, G. O., Haveman, N. J., Naldrett, M. J., Paul, A.-L., Ferl, R. J., and Wyatt, S. E. (2023). Integrative transcriptomics and proteomics profiling of arabidopsis thaliana elucidates novel mechanisms underlying spaceflight adaptation. Front. Plant Sci. 14. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1260429

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Orlando, M., Buchholz, P. C. F., Lotti, M., and Pleiss, J. (2021). The GH19 engineering database: sequence diversity, substrate scope, and evolution in glycoside hydrolase family 19. PloS One 16, e0256817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256817

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Padhiar, D., Kaur, S., Jha, U. C., Prasad, P. V. V., Sharma, K. D., Kumar, S., et al. (2025). Differential resilience of chickpea’s reproductive organs to cold stress across developmental stages: insights into antioxidant strategies for enhanced fertility. Front. Plant Sci. 16. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1545187

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Paynel, F., Leroux, C., Surcouf, O., Schaumann, A., Pelloux, J., Driouich, A., et al. (2014). Kiwi fruit PMEI inhibits PME activity, modulates root elongation and induces pollen tube burst in arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Growth Regul. 74, 285–297. doi: 10.1007/s10725-014-9919-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Peaucelle, A., Braybrook, S., and Höfte, H. (2012). Cell wall mechanics and growth control in plants: the role of pectins revisited. Front. Plant Sci. 3. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00121

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pei, Y., Wang, Y., Wei, Z., Liu, J., Li, Y., Ma, S., et al. (2024). Pectin methylesterase inhibitors ghpmei53 and atpmei19 improve seed germination by modulating cell wall plasticity in cotton and arabidopsis. J. Integr. Agric. 23, 3487–3505. doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.036

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pereira, A. M., Lopes, A. L., and Coimbra, S. (2016). Arabinogalactan proteins as interactors along the crosstalk between the pollen tube and the female tissues. Front. Plant Sci. 7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01895

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pereira, A. M., Pereira, L. G., and Coimbra, S. (2015). Arabinogalactan proteins: rising attention from plant biologists. Plant Reprod. 28, 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s00497-015-0254-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pérez-Pérez, Y., Carneros, E., Berenguer, E., Solís, M.-T., Bárány, I., Pintos, B., et al. (2019). Pectin de-methylesterification and AGP increase promote cell wall remodeling and are required during somatic embryogenesis of quercus suber. Front. Plant Sci. 9. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01915

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Přerovská, T., Jindřichová, B., Henke, S., Yvin, J.-C., Ferrieres, V., Burketová, L., et al. (2022). Arabinogalactan protein-like proteins from ulva lactuca activate immune responses and plant resistance in an oilseed crop. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.893858

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Qian, D., Wang, M., Niu, Y., Yang, Y., and Xiang, Y. (2025). Sexual reproduction in plants under high temperature and drought stress. Cell Rep. 44, 115390. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115390

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Qu, Y., Egelund, J., Gilson, P. R., Houghton, F., Gleeson, P. A., Schultz, C. J., et al. (2008). Identification of a novel group of putative arabidopsis thaliana beta-(1,3)-galactosyltransferases. Plant Mol. Biol. 68, 43–59. doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9351-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rashid, A. (2016). Defense responses of plant cell wall non-catalytic proteins against pathogens. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 94, 38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2016.03.009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Reeves, R. (2001). Molecular biology of HMGA proteins: hubs of nuclear function. Gene 277, 63–81. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00689-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rose, J. K. C., Braam, J., Fry, S. C., and Nishitani, K. (2002). The XTH family of enzymes involved in xyloglucan endotransglucosylation and endohydrolysis: current perspectives and a new unifying nomenclature. Plant Cell Physiol. 43, 1421–1435. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcf171

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sander, L., Child, R., Ulvskov, P., Albrechtsen, M., and Borkhardt, B. (2001). Analysis of a dehiscence zone endo-polygalacturonase in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and arabidopsis thaliana: evidence for roles in cell separation in dehiscence and abscission zones, and in stylar tissues during pollen tube growth. Plant Mol. Biol. 46, 469–479. doi: 10.1023/A:1010619002833

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanhueza, D., Begum, R. A., Albenne, C., Jamet, E., and Fry, S. C. (2022). An arabidopsis thaliana arabinogalactan-protein (AGP31) and several cationic AGP fragments catalyse the boron bridging of rhamnogalacturonan-II. Biochem. J. 479, 1967–1984. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20220340

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schaller, F., Schaller, A., and Stintzi, A. (2004). Biosynthesis and metabolism of jasmonates. J. Plant Growth Regul. 23, 179–199. doi: 10.1007/s00344-004-0047-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sedbrook, J. C., Carroll, K. L., Hung, K. F., Masson, P. H., and Somerville, C. R. (2002). The arabidopsis SKU5 gene encodes an extracellular glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored glycoprotein involved in directional root growth. Plant Cell 14, 1635–1648. doi: 10.1105/tpc.002360

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Seifert, G. J. (2021). The FLA4-FEI pathway: A unique and mysterious signaling module related to cell wall structure and stress signaling. Genes 12, 145. doi: 10.3390/genes12020145

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Seifert, G. J. and Roberts, K. (2007). The biology of arabinogalactan proteins. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 58, 137–161. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103801

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shiu, S.-H. and Bleecker, A. B. (2001). Plant receptor-like kinase gene family: diversity, function, and signaling. Sci STKE 2001 (113), re22. doi: 10.1126/stke.2001.113.re22

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Showalter, A. M. (2001). Arabinogalactan-proteins: structure, expression and function. Cell. Mol. Life Sci: CMLS 58, 1399–1417. doi: 10.1007/PL00000784

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Showalter, A. M., Keppler, B., Lichtenberg, J., Gu, D., and Welch, L. R. (2010). A bioinformatics approach to the identification, classification, and analysis of hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins. Plant Physiol. 153 (2), 485–513. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.156554

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Showalter, A. M. and Basu, D. (2016). Glycosylation of arabinogalactan-proteins essential for development in arabidopsis. Communic Integr. Biol. 9, e1177687. doi: 10.1080/19420889.2016.1177687

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva, J., Ferraz, R., Dupree, P., Showalter, A. M., and Coimbra, S. (2020). Three Decades of Advances in Arabinogalactan-Protein Biosynthesis. Front Plant Sci. 11, 610377. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.610377

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Smyth, D. R., Bowman, J. L., and Meyerowitz, E. M. (1990). Early flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2 (8), 755–767. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.8.755

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Steinhorst, L. and Kudla, J. (2013). Calcium and reactive oxygen species rule the waves of signaling. Plant Physiol. 163, 471–485. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.222950

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, S. and Higashiyama, T. (2018). Arabinogalactan proteins and their sugar chains: functions in plant reproduction, research methods, and biosynthesis. Plant Reprod. 31, 67–75. doi: 10.1007/s00497-018-0329-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, L., Eberhard, S., Pattathil, S., Warder, C., Glushka, J., Yuan, C., et al. (2013). An arabidopsis cell wall proteoglycan consists of pectin and arabinoxylan covalently linked to an arabinogalactan protein. Plant Cell 25, 270–287. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.107334

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, L., Cheng, J., Zhang, L., Backe, J., Urbanowicz, B., Heiss, C., and Azadi, P. (2024). Pectic-AGP is a major form of Arabidopsis AGPs. Carbohydr Polym. 330, 121838. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.121838

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tryfona, T., Liang, H.-C., Kotake, T., Tsumuraya, Y., Stephens, E., and Dupree, P. (2012). Structural characterization of arabidopsis leaf arabinogalactan polysaccharides. Plant Physiol. 160, 653–666. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.202309

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tryfona, T., Theys, T. E., Wagner, T., Stott, K., Keegstra, K., and Dupree, P. (2014). Characterisation of FUT4 and FUT6 α-(1→2)-fucosyltransferases reveals that absence of root arabinogalactan fucosylation increases arabidopsis root growth salt sensitivity. PloS One 9, e93291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093291

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Turek, I., Marondedze, C., Wheeler, J. I., Gehring, C., and Irving, H. R. (2014). Plant natriuretic peptides induce proteins diagnostic for an adaptive response to stress. Front. Plant Sci. 5. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00661

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

van Hengel, A. J., Tadesse, Z., Immerzeel, P., Schols, H., van Kammen, A., and de Vries, S. C. (2001). N-acetylglucosamine and glucosamine-containing arabinogalactan proteins control somatic embryogenesis. Plant Physiol. 125, 1880–1890. doi: 10.1104/pp.125.4.1880

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Velasquez, S. M., Ricardi, M. M., Dorosz, J. G., Fernandez, P. V., Nadra, A. D., Pol-Fachin, L., et al. (2011). O-glycosylated cell wall proteins are essential in root hair growth. Science 332, 1401–1403. doi: 10.1126/science.1206657

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Vignali, R. and Marracci, S. (2020). HMGA genes and proteins in development and evolution. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 654. doi: 10.3390/ijms21020654

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wickramanayake, J. S., Goss, J. A., Zou, M., and Goggin, F. L. (2020). Loss of function of fatty acid desaturase 7 in tomato enhances photosynthetic carbon fixation efficiency. Front. Plant Sci. 11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00932

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wolf, S., Mouille, G., and Pelloux, J. (2009). Homogalacturonan methyl-esterification and plant development. Mol. Plant 2, 851–860. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssp066

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wormit, A. and Usadel, B. (2018). The multifaceted role of pectin methylesterase inhibitors (PMEIs). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 2878. doi: 10.3390/ijms19102878

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wrzaczek, M., Brosché, M., and Kangasjärvi, J. (2013). ROS signaling loops—Production, perception, regulation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 16, 575–582. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2013.07.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, W., Dubos, C., and Lepiniec, L. (2015). Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis by MYB–bhlh–WDR complexes. Trends Plant Sci. 20, 176–185. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.12.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, H., You, C., Yang, S., Zhang, Y., Yang, F., Li, X., et al. (2021). The role of calcium/calcium-dependent protein kinases signal pathway in pollen tube growth. Front. Plant Sci. 12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.633293

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yokoyama, R. and Nishitani, K. (2004). Genomic basis for cell-wall diversity in plants. A Comparative Approach to Gene Families in Rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 45, 1111–1121. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pch151

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, Y.-K., Li, Y.-L., Ding, L.-N., Sarwar, R., Zhao, F.-Y., and Tan, X.-L. (2020). Mechanism and regulation of silique dehiscence, which affects oil seed production. Front. Plant Sci. 11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00580

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, A. (2009). Protein interaction networks: Computational analysis (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press).

Google Scholar

Zhang, G. Y., Feng, J., Wu, J., and Wang, X. W. (2010). Bopmei1, A pollen-specific pectin methylesterase inhibitor, has an essential role in pollen tube growth. Planta 231, 1323–1334. doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1136-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Held, M. A., Kaur, D., and Showalter, A. M. (2021). CRISPR-cas9 multiplex genome editing of the hydroxyproline-O-galactosyltransferase gene family alters arabinogalactan-protein glycosylation and function in arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 21, 16. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02791-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Zhu, X., Zhang, Y., Wu, Z., Fan, S., and Zhang, L. (2022). Comparative transcriptome analysis identifies key defense genes and mechanisms in mulberry (Morus alba) leaves against silkworms (Bombyx mori). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 13519. doi: 10.3390/ijms232113519

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, X., Zhou, X., Zhang, X., Dong, H., Dong, Y., and Zhu, H. (2024). Secretory CAZymes Profile and GH19 Enzymes Analysis of Corallococcus silvisoli c25j21. Front. Microbiol. 15. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1324153

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zinta, G., Khan, A., AbdElgawad, H., Verma, V., and Srivastava, A. K. (2016). Unveiling the redox control of plant reproductive development during abiotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00700

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zuo, Y., Abbas, A., Dauda, S. O., Chen, C., Bose, J., Donovan-Mak, M., et al. (2025). Function of key ion channels in abiotic stresses and stomatal dynamics. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 220, 109574. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.109574

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: arabinogalactan proteins, cell signaling, cell wall, development, glycosylation, reproduction, stress response

Citation: Ayorinde DA, Olanrewaju GO and Showalter AM (2026) Transcriptomic insights into arabinogalactan protein mechanism of action in galactosyltransferase octuple mutants. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1706954. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1706954

Received: 16 September 2025; Accepted: 15 December 2025; Revised: 04 December 2025;
Published: 16 January 2026.

Edited by:

Peng Wang, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Reviewed by:

Liang Zhang, University of Georgia, United States
Dian Wang, Qingdao Agricultural University, China

Copyright © 2026 Ayorinde, Olanrewaju and Showalter. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Damilola A. Ayorinde, ZGE1MDkyMTlAb2hpby5lZHU=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.