Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Functional and Applied Plant Genomics

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing sugarcane sustainability: Breeding and innovations for climate resilienceView all 3 articles

Comparing four heat-inducible promoters in stably transformed sugarcane regarding spatial and temporal control of transgene expression reveals candidates to drive stem preferred transgene expression

Provisionally accepted
  • 1DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation, Gainesville, United States
  • 2University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
  • 3Agronomy Department; Genetics Institute; Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Small heat shock protein (sHSP) promoters contain cis-regulatory elements that induce transcription in response to heat stress, making them valuable tools for functional studies through controlled gene expression and precise regulation of gene editing tools or morphogenic regulators. To evaluate their utility, GUS reporter gene expression driven by four plant-sourced HSP promoters (pGmHSP17.5, pHvHSP17, pZmHSP17.7, and pZmHSP26) were compared across various tissues of stably transformed sugarcane before and after heat treatment. At 22°C, all promoters showed minimal activity in leaves and roots, though pZmHSP17.7 and pHvHSP17 displayed moderate expression in stems. Following heat treatment, all promoters exhibited their highest activity in stems, followed by leaves and roots. In stem tissues, pGmHSP17.5 displayed heat-induced uidA expression comparable to the constitutive pZmUbi promoter. Notably, heat-induced reporter gene activity in stem mid-sections of single-copy transgenic lines containing pZmHSP17.7, pHvHSP17, or pZmHSP26 exceeded pZmUbi-derived uidA activity by 9.7-fold, 3.8-fold, and 3.0-fold, respectively, with 346-to 3,672-fold induction compared to control conditions. Most promoters showed peak expression in middle sections of the stem, while pHvHSP17 was most active in stem apices. Histochemical analysis revealed that pZmHSP17.7 and pHvHSP17 were active in both parenchyma cells and vascular bundles and within sugarcane stems. Among leaf tissues, mature leaves exhibited greater expression than senescing or immature leaves, while root activity remained consistently minimal across all promoters. Temperature-course experiments identified distinct activation thresholds: 34-36°C for pZmHSP17.7, 36°C for pZmHSP26, 36-38°C for pHvHSP17, and 40-42°C for pGmHSP17.5. Drought stress also induced reporter gene transcription in stems under HSP promoters, though with lower fold-induction than heat treatment. These findings provide valuable tools for gene function studies and biotechnology applications, including heat stress tolerance research, controlled transgene expression in metabolic engineering, precision gene editing, and developmental biology studies.

Keywords: Heat Inducible Promoter, sugarcane, Vegetative tissue, uidA, stem, GUS activity, transgene expression, In Silico Analysis of Heat Shock Elements

Received: 19 Sep 2025; Accepted: 28 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Qiande and Altpeter. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Fredy Altpeter, altpeter@ufl.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.