Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Plant Sci., 30 January 2026

Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1711405

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvanced Breeding for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crops, Volume IIView all 26 articles

Calcium-dependent protein kinases as central hubs in plant abiotic stress signaling: mechanisms and prospects for crop improvement

Samuel Azupio,,Samuel Azupio1,2,3Yu Wang,Yu Wang1,2Joshua Obeng,Joshua Obeng3,4Abdul Kadir Issah,Abdul Kadir Issah1,2Jing Chu,Jing Chu1,2Hongmei Zhang,Hongmei Zhang1,2Qing Xie,Qing Xie1,2Xingyu Jiang,*Xingyu Jiang1,2*
  • 1College of Coastal Agricultural Sciences, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China
  • 2National Center of Technology Innovation for Saline-Alkali Tolerant Rice, College of Coastal Agricultural Sciences, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China
  • 3Council for Scientific and Industrial Research – Oil Palm Research Institute, Kade, Ghana
  • 4Department of Plant Science, College of Agriculture, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN, United States

Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) are key Ca²+ sensors that decode stress-induced calcium signatures through substrate phosphorylation, ROS regulation, kinase cross-talk, and precise spatiotemporal activity, playing a central role in orchestrating plant responses to abiotic stress. This review systematically examines the central role of CDPKs in mediating plant tolerance to drought, salinity, and extreme temperatures. It highlights how CDPKs regulate key processes such as stomatal closure, ion homeostasis, osmotic balance, antioxidant defense, and gene expression through the phosphorylation of transcription factors, ion channels, and metabolic enzymes. Moreover, it discusses the functional redundancy and specificity within large CDPKs gene families, which enable precise responses to specific stresses. Furthermore, the review explores the critical cross-talk between CDPKs signaling networks and phytohormone pathways, particularly abscisic acid (ABA), and their integration with reactive oxygen species (ROS) and MAPK signaling cascades. Recent advances demonstrating the potential of manipulating specific CDPKs isoforms to enhance multi-stress resilience in transgenic plants are also summarized. By synthesizing current knowledge, this review provides insights into the molecular mechanisms of CDPKs-mediated stress adaptation. It identifies future research directions for developing climate-resilient crops through targeted genetic engineering of CDPKs signaling pathways.

1 Introduction

Plants are subjected to various environmental stresses, such as drought, heat, salinity, and low temperatures, which prevent their growth and reduce productivity (Zhang et al., 2023). They engage in signaling pathways and regulatory processes that sense the stress signals and react by releasing responsive genes with the help of adaptive biochemical and physiological responses (Kim et al., 2021).

At the core of this adaptation is calcium, a second messenger that encodes environmental stress signals through its fluctuations. These Ca²+ dynamics are sensed and interpreted by Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs), which act as pivotal molecular transducers, translating calcium oscillations into phosphorylation-driven signaling events that regulate gene expression, ion transport, and metabolic reprogramming (Dekomah et al., 2022). The calcium sensors, such as CDPKs and calmodulins, calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs), perceive the stress-induced changes in cytoplasmic calcium and subsequently activate more targets in these pathways (Ren et al., 2023) and participate in hormonal, stress, and metabolic cross-talk, leading to rapid stress adaptation (Yip Delormel and Boudsocq, 2019). CDPKs are unique serine/threonine kinases harboring an intrinsic calmodulin-like regulatory domain that enables them to directly sense and decode intracellular calcium signals without requiring separate calmodulin proteins (Boudsocq and Sheen, 2013; Valmonte et al., 2014; Yip Delormel and Boudsocq, 2019). CDPKs also contain at least four domains, including a variable N-terminus domain (VNTD), a protein kinase catalytic domain, and an autoinhibitory junction domain (AI-JD) and C-terminal calmodulin-like domain (CaM-LD) harboring EF hand motifs for calcium perception; the structures of these latter domains have been resolved from several plant species, including Arabidopsis thaliana, Glycine max (Cheng et al., 2002; Liese and Romeis, 2013; Xu et al., 2015). This VNTD varies greatly between CDPKs and serves as a site for functional specialization and subcellular localization with the N-terminal myristoylation and palmitoylation, leading to the specific interactions with certain membranes or substrates (Boudsocq and Sheen, 2013; Shi et al., 2018).

For example, AtCPK6 regulates the Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 to enhance salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana, and AtCPK23 mediates drought-induced stomatal closure (Quan et al., 2007; Brandt et al., 2012). Conversely, AtCPK23 modulates stomatal closure by phosphorylating slow anion channels (SLAC1), a key mechanism for limiting water loss during osmotic stress (Mori et al., 2006). In rice (Oryza sativa), OsCPK21 preferentially interacts with bZIP transcription factors to induce drought-responsive genes, while OsCPK4 regulates MAPK pathway components under combined drought-salt stress (Tanpure et al., 2021; Geng et al., 2024). The binding of Ca2+ to the CaM-LD causes a release of autoinhibition (AI). It therefore evicts AI-junction domain residue from its inhibitory site on the enzyme-capping junction domain, activating kinase activity (Liese and Romeis, 2013; Yip Delormel and Boudsocq, 2019; Bredow and Monaghan, 2022). Therefore, the variations in the EF-hand motifs and calcium-binding affinities give rise to different activation kinetics among CDPKs isoforms that further increase the diversity of their signaling functions (Yip Delormel and Boudsocq, 2019). CDPKs target substrates such as ion channels and transcription factors, translating calcium signals into stress, development, and hormonal responses (Mittal et al., 2017; Marques et al., 2022). Gene duplication and divergence have led to the expansion of CDPKs families for plant-specific functions in species including Arabidopsis, rice, and tomato (Xu et al., 2015). Table 1 provides a comparative overview of CDPKs gene distributions across major crops and model plants, illustrating both conserved and lineage-specific expansions that underpin functional specialization in stress signaling, development, and metabolic regulation. This analysis shows that expanding these families due to variations in domains is important for plant adaptation mechanisms.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. CDPKs Distributions among specific plants.

The structural arrangement enables a rapid response to changes in the concentration of Ca2+ in the cell, and the binding of calcium activates CDPKs, which undergo auto-phosphorylation and then phosphorylate proteins, transcription factors, and enzymes (Durian et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2021). The kinases are important positive regulators for ABA-mediated drought and salt tolerance because they phosphorylate ABF/AREB transcription factors, promoting the expression of adaptive genes in response to Stress (Soma et al., 2021). They are also required to maintain ion homeostasis, as one of their targets is the toxic ion Na+, which is removed from cells by Na+/H+ antiporters to counter ionic toxicity generated by alkalinity (Zhao et al., 2021). Besides their role in ion homeostasis, CDPKs interact with ROS-related pathways by regulating NADPH oxidases (Ravi et al., 2023; Hao et al., 2024; van Dieren et al., 2024). This regulation influences ROS generation while enhancing the activity of antioxidant enzymes to mitigate oxidative stress (Hu et al., 2020). Furthermore, CDPKs interact with MAPK cascades and hormonal networks, such as the jasmonic acid pathways, to which they are linked during wound signaling, ensuring an integrated and coordinated response to environmental stress (Vega-Muñoz et al., 2020; Kiselev and Dubrovina, 2025).

CDPKs aid in managing essential processes through this phosphorylation, including maintaining membrane stability, regulating osmotic balance, and providing antioxidant defense (Kiselev and Dubrovina, 2025). In addition, the expression and activity of various CDPKs isoforms are preferentially induced due to specific environmental stresses, such as salinity and drought, which may have an inhibitory consequence, as shown in Table 2, which summarizes the range of abiotic stress types regulated by CDPKs across different crop species, highlighting both conserved signaling components (e.g., drought- and salt-responsive CDPKs) and species-specific regulatory mechanisms that underlie stress adaptation. Some isoforms have specific functions, while others present redundant or partially overlapping functions or activities (Crizel et al., 2020). Further research is needed to deepen our understanding of CDPKs signaling and develop more effective strategies for enhancing plant tolerance in a rapidly changing environment. Stressing the importance of CDPKs in modulating plant adaptation to complex environments, this article extensively explores the molecular processes associated with CDPKs function and the activation of stress-related genes. As key components of the isonomic network, they are excellent candidates for biotechnological techniques that enhance crop resilience.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. CDPKs involvement in abiotic stress impacts on plants.

2 Role of CDPKs genes in plant drought response

Drought stress severely inhibits crop productivity through the impairment of plant water status. Under water limitation, plants trigger complex signal messengers in which CDPKs play an important role in survival. Specific CDPKs isoforms such as AtCPK10, OsCDPK7, TaCDPK25-U, and HvCPK2a are critically involved in drought tolerance by translating transient increases in cytosolic Ca²+ into phosphorylation cascades that regulate stomatal closure, ROS balance, and ABA-mediated signaling. Calcium binding to EF-hand motifs in their calmodulin-like domain induces structural changes that lift autoinhibition, thereby activating kinase function essential for stress adaptation (Mohanta and Sinha, 2016; Singh et al., 2017; Atif et al., 2019; Linghu et al., 2023). Drought induces a rapid mobilization of cytosolic Ca²+, which acts as an emergency signal for activating specific CDPKs isoforms. Once activated, these kinases direct a complex adaptive response by phosphorylating downstream substrates, including transcription factors, ion channels, and metabolic enzymes. The integrated signaling and physiological responses mediated by CDPKs under drought stress, as illustrated in Figure 1, drought perception activates osmotic and mechanosensors that induce Ca²+ influx and ABA signaling, with CDPK−mediated phosphorylation cascades, and SnRK2 activation converging on DREB/CBF, AREB/ABF, NAC, MYB, and WRKY transcription factors to drive the Expression of target genes such as osmolyte, LEA, and antioxidant genes underlying adaptive drought responses. This post-translational regulation modulates gene expression and mediates biological functions crucial for drought tolerance, including stomatal closure, modulation of root growth, and osmotic adjustment. The importance of CDPKs is underscored by their high level of involvement in abscisic acid (ABA) signaling and stress pathways, which centrally integrate a variety of signals into a single defense strategy (Boudsocq and Sheen, 2013; Edel and Kudla, 2016; Su et al., 2024).

Figure 1
Flowchart illustrating the drought stress response in plants. Drought stress is perceived and linked to osmotic/mechanosensors and membrane integrity changes, leading to calcium influx and signal transduction. This activates two pathways: the calcium-dependent pathway and the ABA pathway. The calcium-dependent pathway involves CDPK activation and a phosphorylation cascade targeting transcription factors. The ABA pathway includes perception by receptors, SnRK2 kinase activation, and transcriptional regulation. Adaptive responses include stomatal closure, antioxidant defense, LEA accumulation, and proline synthesis, leading to gene expression and activation of stress-responsive transcription factors.

Figure 1. Mechanisms of drought stress response in plants: calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) pathways and transcriptional regulation. Drought stress is perceived by root systems and triggers osmotic/mechanosensitive signaling such as OSCA1, leading to calcium Ca2+ influx into the cell. The rise in cytosolic calcium activates Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs), which initiate phosphorylation cascades affecting target proteins such as transcription factors. Simultaneously, the abscisic acid (ABA) pathway is engaged through ABA perception by PYR/PYL/RCAR receptor families, resulting in SnRK2 kinase activation and suppression of PP2C phosphatases (e.g., ABI1). Signal transduction from both Ca2+ and ABA pathways converge at transcriptional regulation, where the integration of these signals drives the activation of ABA- and Ca2+ responsive transcription factors and the expression of stress-adaptive genes. These transcriptional changes promote key adaptive responses, including stomatal closure, antioxidant defense, LEA protein accumulation, and proline synthesis. Dashed arrows indicate cross-talk and regulatory interactions between pathways, highlighting mechanistic convergence in the orchestration of drought tolerance strategies.

2.1 Mechanism of drought-induced CDPKs signaling

The molecular mechanism of CDPKs-mediated drought adaptation involves precise signal transduction from calcium perception to physiological output. The primary signal, a drought-induced cytosolic Ca²+ burst, activates CDPKs by binding to their calmodulin-like domain, relieving autoinhibition and activating the kinase domain.

A key mechanism is the regulation of stomatal aperture. CDPKs directly phosphorylate components of the stomatal closure machinery. For instance, in Arabidopsis, AtCPK6, AtCPK21, and AtCPK23 phosphorylate the slow anion channel (SLAC1), facilitating anion efflux and stomatal closure to minimize water loss (Schulz et al., 2013; Maierhofer et al., 2014; Du et al., 2023). This function is conserved across species, as demonstrated by the interaction of ZmCPK35 and ZmCPK37 with ZmSLAC1 in maize (Li et al., 2022; Du et al., 2023). Similar Ca²+–CDPKs–SLAC1 regulatory modules have been observed in tobacco and barley, indicating strong conservation of this mechanism across species (Li and Liu, 2021; Liu et al., 2022). In response to drought stress, Arabidopsis AtCPK8 phosphorylates a key antioxidant enzyme, CAT3, at Ser-261 to enhance its ability to detoxify ROS and promote the plant’s drought tolerance (Zou et al., 2015). Similarly, rice OsCPK14 and OsCPK21 mediated the transcriptional facilitation of the transcription factors (TFs) OsDi19–4 and the regulatory protein OsGF14e, which converge ABA signaling and dry stress response pathways (Wang et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2017).

Moreover, the Calcium-dependent protein kinase ZmCPK17 phosphorylates and inhibits another maize CDPKs, ZmCPK2, under ABA treatment and dehydration conditions (Hu et al., 2024). The inhibition blocks the activating phosphorylation of ZmYAB15, a negative regulator by ZmCPK2, derepressing genes responsive to drought (Hu and Xiong, 2014). The interaction of other kinases with CDPKs forms phosphorylation cascades. In Arabidopsis, AtCPK4/11 phosphorylates RBOHD/F, which generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) and defense signaling (Zhao et al., 2021). In tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), SlCDPK2 and SlCDPK3 regulate drought response by adjusting partially overlapping but different pathways. In water-scarce situations, their synergistic activity helps activate stress-responsive genes, transcription factors, and enzymes, thereby increasing drought tolerance (Hu et al., 2016).

Simultaneously, CDPKs play a crucial role in ABA signaling amplification. They phosphorylate ABA-responsive transcription factors (ABFs), such as ABF1 and ABF4, enhancing the expression of stress-responsive genes involved in osmoprotectant synthesis (e.g., proline) and antioxidant defense (Schulz et al., 2013; Tong et al., 2021; Du et al., 2023). This transcriptional reprogramming is crucial for cellular protection under dehydration stress (Asano et al., 2012).

2.2 Transcriptional regulation of CDPKs genes under drought

There is a dynamic regulation of CDPKs gene expression by drought in an isoform-, organ-, and developmental stage-specific manner. The elevation of only a subset of CDPKs suggests that there might be specific functional specializations for distinct drought signaling activities (Yu et al., 2018); not all CDPKs are upregulated, as some are induced quickly, while others are downregulated or remain unchanged.

Noticeable species-specific patterns can be observed in this regulation. For example, in Arabidopsis, drought and salinity both trigger the induction of AtCDPK1 and AtCDPK2, but heat- or cold-stress does not (Urao et al., 1994). For example, comparative studies in cereals reveal conservation of expression for some orthologous genes and lineage-specific transcriptional patterns indicative of adaptive evolution to local environments in others (Mittal et al., 2017).

Expression varies greatly by tissue. Some isoforms are predominantly expressed in leaves and guard cells, strongly suggesting a direct relationship with stomatal control. In contrast, others display maximum expression level in roots, which are indispensable for water foraging (Gao et al., 2014; Mittal et al., 2017). The complex transcriptional scenario and potential modulation of subcellular localization (Asano et al., 2012) suggest the importance of studying individual members of CDPKs to understand their specific roles in drought-induced responses.

In addition to these differential expression patterns, drought-induced regulation of CDPKs transcription is governed by complex hormonal and epigenetic control mechanisms. Transcriptional regulation of CDPKs genes during drought stress is governed by both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling pathways. Drought-induced accumulation of abscisic acid (ABA) activates transcription factors such as ABF/AREB, DREB2A, and NAC, which bind to ABRE and DRE motifs in CDPKs promoters, driving isoform-specific gene expression. For example, GmCDPK5 and GhCDPK16 are upregulated through ABA pathways, whereas OsCPK9 expression is linked to the enrichment of the ABRE motif involved in stomatal and osmotic regulation (Wei et al., 2014; Veremeichik et al., 2022). In Zea mays, ZmCPK4 and ZmCPK11 show similar ABA-responsive promoter activity mediated by ABF-binding elements (Borkiewicz et al., 2020). In addition to hormonal control, chromatin remodeling and tissue-specific promoter activation further refine CDPKs transcription. The guard cell-specific expression of AtCPK1/2 and the root-localized induction of OsCPK9 exemplify spatially distinct transcriptional responses that support drought adaptation (Hettenhausen et al., 2016; Yan et al., 2024). Together, these multilayered regulatory mechanisms enable the translation of Ca²+ signals into precise gene expression patterns, enhancing the plant’s ability to respond to drought in a context-specific manner.

2.3 Physiological responses mediated by CDPKs under drought stress

The synergistic signaling pathways of CDPKs underlie important physiological modifications that enhance drought resistance at the whole-plant level. These responses involve the promotion of stomatal closure for reducing water loss, induction of osmotic adjustment through accumulation of solutes such as proline and sugars to support cell turgor maintenance, and the improvement in the protective antioxidant system to deleterious reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Bi et al., 2021; Yan et al., 2022). Additionally, CDPKs also regulate RSA to enhance water absorption from the soil (Uga et al., 2013; Xiong et al., 2021). Transgenic approaches further evidence the functional importance of such adaptations; for example, OsCPK9 in rice and GhCPDK16 in cotton, when overexpressed, increase drought tolerance by positively regulating stomatal movement, osmotic adjustment, and antioxidant capability (Wei et al., 2014; Yan et al., 2024). Another tobacco gene, TaCDPK1-5A, had higher sensitivity to dehydration and exogenous phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA). The over-expressions (OEs) of the three genes TaCDPK1-5A, TaMAPK4-7D, and TaABF1-3A showed improved plant responses to drought by altering physiological parameters (better root morphology and higher rate of stomatal closure) but not osmotic stress, as reported by (Hou et al., 2024).

Recent studies have shown that the CDPKs-related kinases HvCRK2 and HvCRK4 function as negative regulators of drought tolerance by interacting with HvCML32, thereby suppressing ABA signaling and promoting ROS accumulation. Their overexpression results in impaired stomatal regulation and diminished antioxidant capacity, underscoring their role in modulating ABA–ROS cross-talk to avoid overactivation of stress responses (Collin et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2022; Cui et al., 2024). These results prove the role of CDPKs as central modulators in drought physiology, and suggest their use as targets for biotechnological crop improvement.

3 CDPKs genes and salinity stress

CDPKs are crucial components in the plant signaling system that respond to salinity stress, disrupting cell homeostasis, including osmotic and ionic balance. CDPKs are primarily Ca²+ sensors that sense salt-triggered calcium signatures and convert them into specific phosphorylation responses to initiate adaptive reactions (Zhu, 2002; Ludwig et al., 2004). As illustrated in Figure 2, salt stress–induced Ca²+ signaling activates CDPKs, which, together with the MAPK cascade and ABA pathway, regulate SOS1, NHX, HKT1, and tonoplast ATPase/PPase activities to drive Na+ efflux, vacuolar sequestration, and overall ionic homeostasis under NaCl stress.

Figure 2
Diagram of NaCl stress response in plants. It shows NaCl stress affecting a sensor that triggers pathways involving calcium, CDPK activation, MAPK cascade, and ABA pathway. These pathways activate ion transporters HTK1, ATK2, and SOS1 for Na+ and K+ movement, and NHX exchangers for vacuolar Na+ sequestration. Tonoplast ATPase, PPase, and V-ATPase are involved in vacuolar H+ and Na+ transport, using ATP and PPi.

Figure 2. Mechanisms of NaCl stress response in plants. The figure demonstrates the cellular pathways plants use to respond to NaCl stress. High salt concentrations trigger stress sensors to detect NaCl, activating calcium ion (Ca²+) signaling to activate Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) such as CmoCDPK20, CsCDPK6, LpCDPK27, and BsCDPK1. The kinases control essential ion transporters, including SOS1 (Na+/H+ exchanger), NHX (vacuolar Na+ exchanger), HKT1 (Na+ transporter), and AKT2 (K+ transporter), as well as tonoplast ATPase and pyrophosphatase (PPase) to maintain ion equilibrium. The diagram incorporates the MAPK cascade, which acts in parallel with CDPKs to modulate SOS1 activity and sodium transport. Additionally, the abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathway interacts with Ca²+-responsive processes and CDPKs, influencing tonoplast ATPase and PPase activities to facilitate proton gradient formation and sodium compartmentalization in the vacuole via NHX1. These coordinated signaling modules support efficient Na+ exclusion and homeostatic adaptation to salt stress. These coordinated signaling modules support efficient Na+ exclusion and homeostatic adaptation to salt stress.

The transcriptional control of genetic factors under salt stress is also a primary function of CDPKs. They phosphorylate and activate transcription factors, particularly those that regulate gene expression related to ion transport (e.g., SOS pathway components) and the biosynthesis of compatible protective osmolytes, such as proline and glycine betaine (Lehmann et al., 2010; Boudsocq and Sheen, 2013). This signaling is deeply integrated with the abscisic acid (ABA) pathway; ABA-induced CDPKs activation amplifies the stress response, reducing salt damage (Edel and Kudla, 2016). Crucially, CDPKs also directly regulate ion homeostasis by controlling the activity and likely the localization of ion channels and transporters, including the Na+/H+ antiporters of the SOS system, to reestablish ionic balance (Silva and Gerós, 2009).

The agronomic importance of CDPKs is underscored by their elevated expression and activity in salt-tolerant cultivars (Mittal et al., 2017; Huang et al., 2020). Quantitative assessments in transgenic plants reveal that CDPKs overexpression significantly enhances salt tolerance by promoting ionic homeostasis, ROS scavenging, and osmotic regulation. For instance, overexpression of TaCDPK27 improved wheat survival by 32% and lowered the Na+/K+ ratio under 200 mM NaCl stress. Similarly, CsCDPK6-expressing lines exhibited a 47% increase in biomass and a 40% reduction in oxidative damage under comparable conditions. Enhanced chlorophyll content and water retention have also been observed in AtCPK6 and AkCDPK15 transgenic lines (Atif et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2021; Yue et al., 2022; Gao et al., 2025). Consequently, transgenic plants overexpressing specific CDPKs genes consistently exhibit enhanced growth and physiological performance in saline environments, confirming their potential as targets for breeding resilient crops.

3.1 CDPKs-mediated mechanisms of salinity tolerance

Salinity inflicts damage through a tripartite mechanism: osmotic stress, which impedes water uptake; ionic Stress, caused by Na+ and Cl- accumulation that disrupts enzyme function and membrane integrity; and secondary oxidative Stress resulting from the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Kaushal, 2020; Van Zelm et al., 2020). CDPKs orchestrate a concerted defense against these challenges to maintain cellular homeostasis. In rice, OsCPK5 and OsCPK13 exemplify such specialization. OsCPK5 functions as a positive regulator of salt stress tolerance by phosphorylating and activating mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) such as OsMPK3 and OsMPK6, which have a role in potassium signaling under saline environments (Su et al., 2024).

Firstly, Ion Homeostasis: CDPKs are pivotal in regulating ionic balance, primarily through the SOS pathway. They are implicated in signaling that activates Na+/H+ antiporters for Na+ extrusion and vacuolar sequestration, while also potentially regulating K+ channels to maintain a favorable K+/Na+ ratio, a critical determinant of salt tolerance (Boudsocq and Sheen, 2013; Edel and Kudla, 2016). In Arabidopsis, isoforms like AtCPK12 and AtCPK23 are directly involved in Na+ regulation (Zhang et al., 2018).

Moreover, Osmotic Adjustment: CDPKs drive the accumulation of compatible solutes to counteract osmotic stress. They promote the biosynthesis of osmolytes, such as proline (e.g., via AtCPK1) and glycine betaine, which help maintain cell turgor and protect cellular structures without interfering with metabolic processes (Urao et al., 1994; Lehmann et al., 2010). Furthermore, Oxidative Stress Mitigation: CDPKs activate the antioxidant defense system to mitigate ROS-induced damage. Functional studies reveal that ZmCPK11 regulates ROS detoxification via phosphorylation cascades that enhance SOD, APX, and CAT activities under stress. Acting upstream of ZmMPK5, it mediates ABA-induced antioxidant responses and limits damage caused by lipid peroxidation. Overexpression of ZmCPK11 increased SOD activity by 38% and reduced H2O2 accumulation by 40% in transgenic lines, confirming its pivotal role in Ca²+–ABA–ROS signaling. Similar redox-modulatory functions are shared by related isoforms ZmCPK17 and ZmCPK7 (Ding et al., 2013; Borkiewicz et al., 2020; Hu et al., 2024).

Functional studies in diverse species validate the efficacy of this CDPKs-mediated network. Overexpression of BsCDPK1, CmoCDPK20, CsCDPK6, and LpCDPK27 (Zhu et al., 2021; Su et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025) consistently improves salt tolerance phenotypes, including better germination, root growth, ion homeostasis (elevated K+/Na+ ratio), reduced oxidative markers (MDA, H2O2), and enhanced expression of stress-responsive genes. In summary, CDPKs signaling consolidates the regulation of ion transport, osmolyte production, and ROS detoxification into a unified adaptive response. The central regulatory function of CDPKs positions them as optimal targets for biotechnological approaches focused on cultivating crops for sustainable agriculture in saline conditions.

4 CDPKs genes and temperature stress

CDPKs play pivotal roles in the complex signal transduction pathways to heat and cold stress. As the primary Ca²+ sensors, CDPKs transform temperature-generated alterations in cytosolic Ca²+ levels into distinct phosphorylation statuses, thereby integrating multiple protective physiological processes. As the planet warms and temperatures shift more frequently, the importance of these factors is growing. High and low temperatures disrupt native cell processes by denaturing proteins, breaking down membranes, and increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS), among other effects. CDPKs mediate the restoration of damage by modulating key processes, including the upregulation of heat shock proteins (HSPs), activation of antioxidant systems, and maintenance of membrane stability and osmotic balance. This increases the probability of survival for plants (Petrov et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2017).

4.1 Response of CDPKs genes to heat stress

Activation of the CDPKs genes, as illustrated in Figure 3, heat stress activates specific transcription factors and heat−shock protein modules that are regulated by CDPKs, thereby modulating ROS production, stomatal function, plasma−membrane stability, and antioxidant enzymes to collectively enhance heat resistance, is an important early step in heat shock signal transduction caused by the disruption of intracellular calcium concentrations. Increased temperature would induce an influx of Ca²+ ions that activate specific CDPKs isoforms that, in turn, transduce this signal through restricted phosphorylation cascades to induce the core cascade of stress-responsive pathways (Klimecka and Muszyńska, 2007; Yang et al., 2021). One primary function of the CDPKs during heat stress is their direct modulation, achieved by binding to and modifying factors involved in the heat-shock response. The small heat shock protein sHSP17 is a substrate of ZmCPK7—4 at Ser-44, affecting its chaperone activity and general thermotolerance. The same kinase phosphorylates the respiratory burst oxidase homologue RBOHB at Ser-99, implying that 118 is involved in the modulation of ROS signaling under Stress (Zhao et al., 2021). Physical interaction of OsCPK12 with OsHSP18. 0 results in phosphorylation of Thr-32 and increases the protein stability against thermal inactivation (Chen et al., 2011; Kuang et al., 2017).

Figure 3
Diagram illustrating heat stress effects. Heat stress impacts transcriptional factors ERF3, ATF3, WRKY33, ABF4, and HSFs. These lead to the expression of sHSP17.4, P300, HSP70, creating reactive oxygen species, affecting stomata, plasma membrane, and enzymes like CAT3. CDPK influences this pathway, enhancing heat resistance with proteins such as AtCPK and GhCDPK.

Figure 3. Mechanisms of heat stress response and resistance in plants. The figure illustrates plant heat stress responses through molecular mechanisms, demonstrating how transcription factors and Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) function in signaling pathways to regulate heat tolerance. The transcription factors ERF3, ATF3, CsABF2, HsfA2, WRKY33, HSFs, and ABF4 initiate stress-responsive gene expression when plants encounter elevated temperatures. The CDPKs GhCDPK16, AtCDPK4/11, AtCPK3, CsCDPK20, TaCDPK10, AtCPK10, GhCDPK45/37/40, AtCPK8, and GhCDPK16/15/19/27 function through phosphorylation to control stomatal function as well as plasma membrane stability and enzymatic activity. For instance, AtCPK3 activates S-type anion channels, such as SLAC1, in guard cells when it receives signals from calcium. This makes it easier for ions to leave the cell and for the stomata to shut. During ethylene signaling, AtCPK3 also makes more reactive oxygen species (ROS) through NADPH oxidases (AtRBOHD/F). It also helps close stomata when pathogens are present by chance (Mori et al., 2006; Boudsocq and Sheen, 2013; Zhang et al., 2022). TaCDPK10 is a kinase in guard cells that senses Ca²+ and controls the activity of inward K+ channels. It also helps close stomata to lower transpiration. Cellular protection against thermal damage depends on reactive oxygen species (ROS), small heat shock proteins (sHSPs), and antioxidant enzymes, including catalase (CAT3). Together, these mechanisms help plants survive heat stress conditions, and scientists can use them to develop molecular approaches to enhance crop thermotolerance.

CDPKs regulate the heat shock transcriptional program. AtCPK3 and -13 have been shown to phosphorylate the HSFB2a transcription factor, providing an indirect level of control over SP synthesis by CDPKs (Du et al., 2023). This regulation of CDPKs, as part of signaling cascades, contributes to the overall complexity of hormone and ROS signal transduction networks. This coordinated response is reinforced by the interplay of different signaling pathways, such as regulation of gene expression, activation of antioxidant enzymes, and stomatal conductance modulation, contributing to a solid global achievement of thermotolerance (Saidi et al., 2009; Zou et al., 2010; Schulz et al., 2013; Atif et al., 2019). This regulatory role is vital, as studies have shown that the elevated expression of specific CDPKs isoforms directly correlates with enhanced heat stress tolerance.

4.2 Cold stress and CDPKs gene regulation

CDPKs are crucial regulatory factors for plant cold tolerance, acting as key calcium sensors and signal transducers in response to low temperatures. Figure 4 depicts the interaction network between CDPKs and transcription factors involved in cold stress adaptation via the plasma membrane, enzymatic activities (lipoxygenase), and reactive oxygen species. A rapid array of physiological responses is induced by cold, most notably a prominent transient increase in intracellular calcium contents, an initial signal for CDPKs activation (Iqbal et al., 2022). Several CDPKs isoforms, such as AtCPK32, are induced and activated at higher levels during cold stress, suggesting their specific functions in nucleic acid regulation for conferring increased stress tolerance. Conversely, OsCPK13 responds to cold and gibberellin (GA) signals, participating in stress signaling by phosphorylating transcription factors, including OsERF104. Therefore, augmenting the expression of genes related to cold tolerance (Abbasi et al., 2004).

Figure 4
Diagram showing interactions among proteins and their roles in cold resistance. Black ovals represent proteins like NLP7 and CAMTA3, connected by blue lines to brown ovals representing various CPKs and CDPKs. Each brown oval is linked below to specific roles: ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species), EA (Enzymatic Activity), SC (Stomatal Closure), and PM (Plasma Membrane). Labels underneath describe functions, emphasizing cold resistance.

Figure 4. Interactions between Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) and transcription factors in cold stress pathways. This figure illustrates the complex regulatory network between Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) and transcription factors involved in cold stress adaptation in plants. Functional categories include reactive oxygen species (ROS), environmental adaptation (EA), stomatal closure (SC), and plant metabolism (PM), each of which contributes to plant resilience under cold conditions. Blue connecting lines represent documented interactions between transcription factors and CDPKs, highlighting their roles in cold stress signaling and adaptation.

These kinases exert significant control over the cold acclimation adaptive process, influencing gene transcription, metabolism, and the antioxidative response with considerable strength, thereby providing a high level of protection against oxidative stress-induced injury by low temperatures. It is well-documented that CDPKs activity is closely associated with the CBF/DREB transcriptional cascade, which controls the expression of several cold-responsive genes and thus plays an essential role in cold adaptation (Yuan et al., 2018; Tong et al., 2021). By contrast, ZmCPK1-a, a calcium-independent maize CDPKs, downregulates cold tolerance by decreasing the expression of cold-induced ZmERF3 and therefore can act as a negative modulator in the fine-tuning of cold stress signaling (Weckwerth et al., 2015). CDPKs mediate a complex cross-talk with reactive oxygen species (ROS).

However, cold shock often accumulates pro-inflammatory and potentially harmful ROS; these molecules also act as secondary messengers. CDPKs connect the ROS signal to the stress response network, enabling plants to cope with low temperatures by regulating osmotic balance, detoxifying ROS, and repairing cellular damage (Dreyer and Dietz, 2018; Dong et al., 2020; Shi and Zhu, 2024). They maintain membrane fluidity and ion balance to ensure cell membrane stability under cold stress by maintaining physiological homeostasis. The activity of specific isoforms relies on their subcellular localization, which can alter in response to low temperatures, as has been shown for AtCPK32, emphasizing the importance of spatiotemporal specificity in their function as regulators of gene expression (Zou et al., 2010; Atif et al., 2019). CDPKs function as key factors to enable a coherent and effective transcriptional and physiological response to cold, consolidating their role as master regulators of cold acclimation and tolerance in plants through physical or genetic interactions with a variety of downstream targets, as well as hormonal signaling cascades such as abscisic acid (ABA).

5 Cross-talk: CDPKs at the junction of multiple stress signaling pathways

Plants frequently experience simultaneous abiotic stressors, including dryness and salinity or heat and drought. They have developed intricate signaling networks to address these issues, in which CDPKs are key integrators. As illustrated in Figure 5, the central CDPKs hub integrates diverse stress-induced Ca²+ signatures and mediates downstream phosphorylation of transcription factors, ion channels, hormone pathways, and ROS enzymes, coordinating cross-talk among these signaling pathways to regulate plant stress responses. CDPKs serve as molecular interpreters that translate stress-specific calcium signals into precise physiological responses by phosphorylating several downstream substrates, facilitating coordinated adaptation to numerous stresses (Ludwig et al., 2004).

Figure 5
Diagram illustrating stress response in plants. Stressors are perceived, leading to a calcium signature activating a central CDPK hub. This hub communicates with transcription factors, ion channels, hormone pathways, ABA pathways, MAPK pathways, and ROS enzymes through phosphorylation, facilitating cross-talk between these elements.

Figure 5. Schematic representation of Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) as a central hub of plant abiotic stress signaling. Diverse abiotic stressors, including cold, drought, heat, oxidative stress, and salinity, are perceived by plant cells, eliciting distinct Ca²+ signaling signatures. These Ca²+ signals activate the central CDPKs hub, which transduces stress signals through phosphorylation of multiple downstream targets. Key CDPKs-regulated components include transcription factors, ion channels, hormone-related pathways (including ABA signaling), MAPK cascades, and enzymes associated with reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis. Extensive cross-talk between these modules enables dynamic modulation of gene expression, membrane transport, hormonal balance, and oxidative stress responses, orchestrating rapid and coordinated cellular adaptation to environmental challenges.

CDPKs function as pivotal integrators of plant responses to diverse abiotic stresses by mediating Calcium-dependent protein kinases regulation of hormonal signaling, redox balance, and ion homeostasis. In rice, isoforms such as OsCPK4, OsCPK7, OsCPK12, OsCPK13, OsCPK17, OsCPK21, and OsCPK26 operate synergistically under combined drought, salinity, and cold stress conditions. These kinases promote cross-tolerance by activating antioxidant enzymes, preserving plasma membrane stability, and modulating ABA-responsive transcriptional networks (Asano et al., 2011; Mohanta and Sinha, 2016; Naeem et al., 2019). Similarly, in Arabidopsis, AtCPK10, AtCPK11, AtCPK23, and AtCPK32 contribute to drought, salt, and cold Stress tolerance by regulating stomatal dynamics and inducing oxidative stress–responsive genes via ABA and MAPK signaling pathways (Asano et al., 2012; Gao et al., 2014; Naeem et al., 2019; Akram et al., 2024). This signaling complexity is further amplified by cross-talk with MAPK cascades; for instance, AtCPK5 activates the NADPH oxidase RBOHD to generate ROS, which in turn amplifies the stress signal through MAPK activation (Dubiella et al., 2013).

In Zea mays, ZmCPK4 and ZmCPK17 orchestrate drought–heat stress responses by enhancing the expression of ROS-scavenging enzymes and heat shock transcription factors, thereby sustaining photosynthetic performance and cellular stability under elevated temperatures (Du et al., 2023; Hu et al., 2024). In Gossypium hirsutum, GhCPK33 exemplifies a multifunctional CDPKs, conferring resistance to salt, heat, and oxidative stress through upregulation of antioxidant defenses and osmoprotectant-related genes (Akram et al., 2024; Patil et al., 2024). Cotton utilizes GhCPK1, GhCPK6, and GhCPK23 to modulate ion transporters under saline-drought conditions (Li et al., 2015; Mahmood et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2024). Mulberry enhances salt-drought tolerance through the regulation of stress-responsive genes by MaCDPK1 and MaCDPK10 (Cao et al., 2020). Collectively, these studies highlight the remarkable functional versatility of CDPKs in mediating cross-tolerance. Distinct isoforms function as calcium-responsive signaling nodes, converting transient calcium signatures into targeted phosphorylation events that integrate ABA signaling, ROS detoxification, and ionic regulation under complex environmental stress combinations (Dutta et al., 2024; Patil et al., 2024).

The integration of CDPKs signaling with ABA pathways is a cornerstone of cross-tolerance. In rice, this is exemplified by OsMADS23-mediated upregulation of both ABA biosynthesis genes (OsNCED2/3/4) and the proline synthesis gene OsP5CR (Li et al., 2023). These findings collectively position CDPKs as central hubs in Stress signaling networks, making them promising targets for engineering multi-stress-resistant crops. Multi-omics investigations provide compelling evidence for the integration of CDPKs-mediated ion and redox signaling under combined abiotic stress conditions. In Zea mays, transcriptomic analyses revealed the coordinated upregulation of ZmCPK11, ZmCPK17, and ZmCPK37 alongside ROS-scavenging genes during concurrent drought and heat stress (Du et al., 2023). Comparable transcriptomic and proteomic studies in Cicer arietinum and Fragaria × ananassa demonstrated co-expression of CDPKs with antioxidant enzymes under salt–heat and salt–cold stress combinations, respectively (Crizel et al., 2020; Deepika et al., 2022). A recent comparative genomic analysis in Populus identified conserved CDPKs gene clusters associated with redox and ion homeostasis under stress conditions (Mu et al., 2024).

Additionally, proteomic interaction network mapping has highlighted central roles for CDPKs in orchestrating cross-talk among Ca²+, ROS, and ABA signaling pathways during complex stress responses (Zubair et al., 2025). Current research focuses on manipulating key CDPKs nodes, such as OsCPK12 for ROS management and GhCPK1 for ion homeostasis, through genetic engineering to develop broad-spectrum climate resilience. This approach leverages the conserved yet adaptable nature of the CDPKs signaling family.

Multiple CDPKs–substrate phosphorylation events have been experimentally validated, offering mechanistic insights into how CDPKs translate Ca²+ signals into stress-responsive outcomes across plant species. Table 3 provides a consolidated summary of these experimentally characterized CDPKs targets, detailing their phosphorylation sites, stress contexts, and physiological consequences. These examples highlight the conserved yet functionally specialized roles of CDPKs isoforms in fine-tuning the adaptation to drought, salinity, heat, and oxidative stress.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Experimentally validated CDPKs substrates, phosphorylation sites, and physiological outcomes under abiotic stress.

6 Research controversies and unexplored aspects

Whereas many family members are positive regulators in plant abiotic stress response, there is now evidence that some isoforms can also act as negative regulators, underscoring the complex and context-dependent nature of CDPKs activity. The functional duality of CDPKs in plant stress signaling is highly dependent on cellular context, dictated by isoform-specific expression patterns, post-translational modifications (PTMs), and dynamic protein–protein interactions. Isoforms such as AtCPK1, AtCPK23, and OsCPK12 exhibit contrasting regulatory roles in ROS and ion signaling pathways, which are influenced by their subcellular localization and phosphorylation state. For example, autophosphorylation of AtCPK1 enhances its activity toward the NADPH oxidase RBOHD, facilitating ROS production during the early phases of stress. In contrast, S-nitrosylation of CDPKs under sustained oxidative conditions inhibits kinase activity, thereby preventing excessive ROS accumulation.

Additionally, ubiquitin-dependent degradation of OsCPK17 has been shown to modulate the duration of its signaling activity under combined salt and heat stress. These context-specific regulatory mechanisms, together with interactions involving 14-3–3 proteins, MAPKs, and calmodulin-like proteins, allow individual CDPKs to function as both positive and negative regulators of stress responses. This enables precise interpretation of Ca²+ signals and ensures appropriate physiological outcomes under fluctuating environmental conditions (Paul et al., 2005; Boudsocq and Sheen, 2013; Zubair et al., 2025). For example, AtCPK23 shifts from acting as a positive to a negative regulator of guard-cell signaling as the strength and duration of calcium oscillations rise. It activates SLAC1 to promote stomatal closure under moderate ABA levels, but later suppresses inward K+ channels (GORK) during extended stress to prevent excessive ion loss (Zou et al., 2010). The roles of individual CDPKs can differ significantly even within the same species. AtCPK10 is a positive regulator of Arabidopsis thaliana by mediating ABA- and Ca²+-induced stomatal closure (Zou et al., 2010).

In contrast, AtCPK23 is a flexible gene that can function as either a positive or negative regulator of stomatal closure (Ma and Wu, 2007; Atif et al., 2019). Barley HvCRK2 and HvCRK4 suppress drought responses by abrogating ABA-response pathways and activating ROS accumulation. This renders them repressors of dehydration tolerance (Cui et al., 2024). This functional divergence is particularly pronounced in maize, with members of the CDPKs family serving distinct functions. ZmCPK4, ZmCPK11, ZmCPK35, and ZMCPK37 function as positive regulators in response to drought and salinity challenges, which are exerted through ABA-mediated stomatal closure, maintenance of Na+/K+ homeostasis, and protection of the photosynthetic process (Jiang et al., 2013; Borkiewicz et al., 2020; Li et al., 2022). Likewise, in maize, ZmCRK1 demonstrates a stress-intensity-dependent regulatory shift, where phosphorylation of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase ZmMHA2 suppresses proton-driven solute uptake during severe drought, yet enhances ion homeostasis and antioxidant defense under milder stress conditions (Liu et al., 2024).

These dual or opposing regulatory roles are supported by genetic and biochemical approaches, including loss-of-function and overexpression mutants, kinase activity assays, and phosphoproteomic analyses (Zou et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2024). Mechanistically, such context dependency arises from isoform-specific Ca²+ sensitivities, subcellular localization patterns, and post-translational modifications (e.g., autophosphorylation and S-nitrosylation), which influence CDPKs–substrate interactions under different environmental or hormonal contexts (Schulz et al., 2013). Consequently, CDPKs act as conditional signal modulators rather than strictly positive or negative regulators, adjusting their activity according to stress intensity, Ca²+ amplitude, and tissue type.

The functional ambiguity of CDPKs extends to stress-specific responses, as exemplified by rice OsCPK12, which enhances salt stress tolerance but may compromise resistance to blast disease, suggesting stress-specific functional trade-offs (Asano et al., 2012). Similarly, in cowpea, VuCPK11 and VuCPK19 regulate drought and salinity responses through transcriptional coordination with VuDREB2A, implicating these kinases as candidate targets for genetic engineering of multi-stress tolerance (Punniyamoorthy and Jegadeesan, 2025). This stress-specific specialization provides a promising framework for crop genetic engineering, where selective overexpression of CDPKs isoforms such as OsCPK4, AtCPK10, or ZmCPK11 has been shown to improve drought, salinity, and heat tolerance without yield penalties, demonstrating the potential to fine-tune stress adaptability through isoform-guided gene editing (Priyadarshan, 2019; Khan, 2025).

Understanding stress-specific CDPKs specialization not only refines our mechanistic insight into Ca²+ signal decoding but also opens avenues for precision engineering of crop resilience, where isoform selection and promoter customization can optimize multi-stress tolerance. This complexity necessitates carefully characterizing individual CDPKs isoforms across different stress conditions to fully understand their roles in plant stress adaptation fully. Future research should integrate isoform-specific, multi-omics, and combinatorial Stress analyses to unravel CDPKs functional diversity. Differences in phosphorylation motifs, localization, and interactions drive isoform specialization, which can be resolved through single-cell transcriptomics and phosphoproteomics (Wu et al., 2025). These integrated approaches will clarify CDPKs signaling hierarchies and enable systems-level genetic engineering for multi-stress tolerance in crops.

6.1 Functional redundancy within the CDPKs family

Functional redundancy among CDPKs isoforms constitutes a key evolutionary mechanism that ensures both signaling resilience and adaptive versatility under stress conditions. Many CDPKs exhibit high sequence similarity, shared Ca²+-binding properties, and overlapping substrate specificities, allowing for compensatory activation when specific isoforms are disrupted. For example, AtCPK4 and AtCPK11 redundantly phosphorylate ABF transcription factors within the ABA signaling pathway, safeguarding stress-induced gene expression in the event of single isoform loss (Zhu et al., 2007). Likewise, AtCPK5 and AtCPK6 cooperatively activate RBOHD to sustain ROS production during pathogen attack and salt stress (Schulz et al., 2013). In rice, OsCPK4 and OsCPK21 exhibit partial functional overlap in modulating ion balance and ROS detoxification under drought and salinity stress (Atif et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2025).

Biologically, this redundancy confers robustness to signaling networks, ensuring continuity and buffering against systemic failure during overlapping or fluctuating environmental stresses. However, from a functional genomics perspective, such redundancy complicates the characterization of genes. Single-gene knockout mutants often show no discernible phenotype due to compensatory expression of paralogous isoforms. At the same time, overexpression studies may yield misleading results due to unintended cross-activation of related CDPKs. To overcome these challenges, recent approaches include CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex knockouts (e.g., AtCPK4/11 double mutants), the use of isoform-specific transcriptional reporters, and phosphoproteomic analyses to delineate primary signaling roles from compensatory effects (Wang et al., 2020).

Collectively, these findings suggest that CDPKs redundancy extends beyond genetic similarity, representing a structured regulatory feature that enables the precise decoding of calcium signals and the flexible coordination of stress responses across diverse environmental contexts.

7 Conclusion

This review has synthesized the compelling evidence that CDPKs are master regulators of plant abiotic stress signaling. As primary decoders of stress-induced calcium signatures, CDPKs orchestrate a sophisticated phosphorylation network that integrates environmental cues into precise physiological adaptations. It detailed their pivotal role in mitigating the effects of drought, salinity, and temperature extremes by regulating key processes such as stomatal aperture, ion homeostasis (e.g., through the SOS pathway), osmotic adjustment via osmolyte accumulation, and antioxidant defense against reactive oxygen species (ROS). The extensive cross-talk between CDPKs and phytohormone pathways, particularly ABA, underscores their role as central hubs that amplify and specify stress signals.

A critical emerging theme is the remarkable functional diversity and context-dependency within CDPKs families. While many isoforms are potent positive regulators of stress tolerance, others, such as ZmCRK1 in maize and HvCRK2/4 in barley, function as negative regulators. These duality, functional redundancy, and specificity highlight the complexity and fine-tuning of CDPKs signaling networks. Their ability to confer cross-tolerance to combined stresses further emphasizes their evolutionary significance as integrators of multiple environmental signals. The conservation of CDPKs functions across diverse plant species, from Arabidopsis to major crops like rice, maize, and cotton, solidifies their fundamental role in plant adaptation and their immense potential as targets for biotechnological intervention.

8 Future perspectives

Despite significant progress, several research avenues are crucial to fully harnessing the potential of CDPKs for crop improvement. Future work must focus on deciphering isoform-specific functions by employing advanced CRISPR/Cas-based gene editing and single-cell transcriptomics to delineate the unique, redundant, and antagonistic roles of individual CDPKs isoforms within specific cell types and developmental stages. Concurrently, a significant effort is needed to elucidate the complete phosphorylation network through phosphoproteomics and biochemical assays to map all downstream substrates, including transcription factors and metabolic enzymes. Furthermore, understanding the context-dependency of CDPKs actions and their cross-talk with other kinase families and hormone pathways beyond ABA is essential for accurate network modeling. Translational research should then leverage this knowledge by exploring sophisticated strategies such as stress-inducible and tissue-specific promoters, stacking favorable alleles while silencing negative regulators, and utilizing synthetic biology to design enhanced CDPKs variants. Finally, exploring natural variation in crop germplasms through GWAS will identify superior alleles for breeding. By integrating these fundamental and applied strategies, we can precisely engineer CDPKs networks to develop climate-resilient crops without growth penalties, thereby securing future food production.

Despite substantial progress having been made in understanding CDPKs-mediated stress responses and applying genome editing for precise functional studies, several obstacles remain. A key drawback of CRISPR/Cas systems is the risk of off-target mutations, which may cause unintended genetic changes or subtle transcriptomic shifts that affect long-term development. Moreover, complex and pleiotropic stress responses, especially under combined stress conditions, can obscure genotype-phenotype relationships, as overlapping pathways or isoform redundancy often conceal the specific effects of individual genes. To overcome these challenges, future research should employ particular guide RNA design, comprehensive off-target detection strategies, and integrative phenomics analyses to enhance the precision and reliability of CDPKs-based crop engineering.

Author contributions

SA: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Data Curation, Methodology. YW: Data curation, Software, Writing – review & editing. JO: Writing – review & editing. AKI: Formal Analysis, Software, Writing – review & editing. JC: Software, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. HZ: Software, Data curation, Writing– review & editing. QX: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Conceptualization. XJ: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2023A1515012295), Program for Guangdong Provincial Innovative team for Development and Utilization of Germplasm Resource of Saline-Alkali Tolerant Plants, National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFE0207203-2), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31660253), Foundation of Sansha City, and Scientific Research Start-up Funds of Guangdong Ocean University.

Acknowledgments

We express our sincere gratitude to Dr. Kwaku Amoah for his valuable contribution to the development and refinement of this review article. His mentorship, knowledge, and insightful critiques have significantly improved the quality and precision of our work.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Abbasi, F., Onodera, H., Toki, S., Tanaka, H., and Komatsu, S. (2004). OsCDPK13, a calcium-dependent protein kinase gene from rice, is induced by cold and gibberellin in rice leaf sheath. Plant Mol. Biol. 55, 541–552. doi: 10.1007/s11103-004-1178-y, PMID: 15604699

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Akram, J., Haider, M. Z., Shafiq, M., Sami, A., Manzoor, M. T., Ali, S., et al. (2024). “Cell signaling response under plants stress,” in Molecular dynamics of plant stress and its management (Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore), 447–474.

Google Scholar

Arefian, M., Bhagya, N., and Prasad, T. S. K. (2021). Phosphorylation-mediated signaling in flowering: prospects and retrospects of phosphoproteomics in crops. Biol. Rev. 96, 2164–2191. doi: 10.1111/brv.12748, PMID: 34047006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Asano, T., Hakata, M., Nakamura, H., Aoki, N., Komatsu, S., Ichikawa, H., et al. (2011). Functional characterization of OsCPK21, a calcium-dependent protein kinase that confers salt tolerance in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 75, 179–191. doi: 10.1007/s11103-010-9717-1, PMID: 21136139

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Asano, T., Hayashi, N., Kikuchi, S., and Ohsugi, R. (2012). CDPK-mediated abiotic stress signaling. Plant Signal Behav. 7, 817–821. doi: 10.4161/psb.20351, PMID: 22751324

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Atif, R. M., Shahid, L., Waqas, M., Ali, B., Rashid, M. A. R., Azeem, F., et al. (2019). Insights on calcium-dependent protein kinases (CPKs) signaling for abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 5298. doi: 10.3390/ijms20215298, PMID: 31653073

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bi, Z., Wang, Y., Li, P., Sun, C., Qin, T., and Bai, J. (2021). Evolution and expression analysis of CDPK genes under drought stress in two varieties of potato. Biotechnol. Lett. 43, 511–521. doi: 10.1007/s10529-020-03037-2, PMID: 33131007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Borkiewicz, L., Polkowska-Kowalczyk, L., Cieśla, J., Sowiński, P., Jończyk, M., Rymaszewski, W., et al. (2020). Expression of maize calcium-dependent protein kinase (ZmCPK11) improves salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants by regulating sodium and potassium homeostasis and stabilizing photosystem II. Physiol. Plant 168, 38–57. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12938, PMID: 30714160

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Boudsocq, M. and Sheen, J. (2013). CDPKs in immune and stress signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 30–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.08.008, PMID: 22974587

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Brandt, B., Brodsky, D. E., Xue, S., Negi, J., Iba, K., Kangasjärvi, J., et al. (2012). Reconstitution of abscisic acid activation of SLAC1 anion channel by CPK6 and OST1 kinases and branched ABI1 PP2C phosphatase action. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 10593–10598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116590109, PMID: 22689970

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bredow, M. and Monaghan, J. (2022). Cross-kingdom regulation of calcium-and/or calmodulin-dependent protein kinases by phospho-switches that relieve autoinhibition. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 68, 102251. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2022.102251, PMID: 35767936

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, Z., He, Q., Wang, P., Yan, J., Awais, M. M., Liu, Z., et al. (2020). Functional characteristics of a calcium-dependent protein kinase (MaCDPK1) enduring stress tolerance from Morus atropurpurea Roxb. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture (PCTOC) 141, 131–143. doi: 10.1007/s11240-020-01773-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, S., Xie, Y., Pan, S., Yu, S., and Zhang, L. (2025). Identification of perennial ryegrass CDPK gene family and function exploration of LpCDPK27 upon salt stress. Grass Res. 5. doi: 10.48130/grares-0025-0010

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, B., Zhou, J., Wang, Y., Yang, Q., et al. (2011). Phosphoproteins regulated by heat stress in rice leaves. Proteome Sci. 9, 37. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-9-37, PMID: 21718517

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Zhou, X., Chang, S., Chu, Z., Wang, H., Han, S., et al. (2017). Calcium-dependent protein kinase 21 phosphorylates 14-3–3 proteins in response to ABA signaling and salt stress in rice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 493, 1450–1456. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.09.166, PMID: 28988107

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, S. H., Willmann, M. R., Chen, H. C., and Sheen, J. (2002). Calcium signaling through protein kinases. The Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family. Plant Physiol. 129, 469–485. doi: 10.1104/pp.005645, PMID: 12068094

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Collin, A., Daszkowska-Golec, A., Kurowska, M., and Szarejko, I. (2020). Barley ABI5 (Abscisic Acid INSENSITIVE 5) is involved in abscisic acid-dependent drought response. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 1138. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01138, PMID: 32849699

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Crizel, R. L., Perin, E. C., Vighi, I. L., Woloski, R., Seixas, A., da Silva Pinto, L., et al. (2020). Genome-wide identification, and characterization of the CDPK gene family reveal their involvement in abiotic stress response in Fragaria x ananassa. Sci. Rep. 10, 11040. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67957-9, PMID: 32632235

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cui, Y., Wu, K., and Yao, X. (2024). The CDPK-related protein kinase HvCRK2 and HvCRK4 interact with HvCML32 to negatively regulate drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 214, 108909. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108909, PMID: 38971089

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Das, R. and Pandey, G. K. (2010). Expressional analysis and role of calcium regulated kinases in abiotic stress signaling. Curr. Genomics 11, 2–13. doi: 10.2174/138920210790217981, PMID: 20808518

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Deepika, D., Poddar, N., Kumar, S., and Singh, A. (2022). Molecular characterization reveals the involvement of calcium dependent protein kinases in abiotic stress signaling and development in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Front. Plant Sci. 13, 831265. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.831265, PMID: 35498712

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dekomah, S. D., Bi, Z., Dormatey, R., Wang, Y., Haider, F. U., Sun, C., et al. (2022). The role of CDPKs in plant development, nutrient and stress signaling. Front. Genet. 13, 996203. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.996203, PMID: 36246614

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ding, Y., Cao, J., Ni, L., Zhu, Y., Zhang, A., Tan, M., et al. (2013). ZmCPK11 is involved in abscisic acid-induced antioxidant defense and functions upstream of ZmMPK5 in abscisic acid signaling in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 871–884. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers366, PMID: 23268839

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, H., Wu, C., Luo, C., Wei, M., Qu, S., and Wang, S. (2020). Overexpression of MdCPK1a gene, a calcium dependent protein kinase in apple, increase tobacco cold tolerance via scavenging ROS accumulation. PloS One 15, e0242139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242139, PMID: 33211731

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

dos, R. S. P., Lima, A. M., and De Souza, C. R. B. (2012). Recent molecular advances on downstream plant responses to abiotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 8628–8647. doi: 10.3390/ijms13078628, PMID: 22942725

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dreyer, A. and Dietz, K. J. (2018). Reactive oxygen species and the redox-regulatory network in cold stress acclimation. Antioxidants. 7, 169. doi: 10.3390/antiox7110169, PMID: 30469375

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Du, H., Chen, J., Zhan, H., Li, S., Wang, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2023). The roles of CDPKs as a convergence point of different signaling pathways in maize adaptation to abiotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 2325. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032325, PMID: 36768648

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dubiella, U., Seybold, H., Durian, G., Komander, E., Lassig, R., Witte, C. P., et al. (2013). Calcium-dependent protein kinase/NADPH oxidase activation circuit is required for rapid defense signal propagation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 8744–8749. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221294110, PMID: 23650383

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Durian, G., Sedaghatmehr, M., Matallana-Ramirez, L. P., Schilling, S. M., Schaepe, S., Guerra, T., et al. (2020). Calcium-dependent protein kinase CPK1 controls cell death by in vivo phosphorylation of senescence master regulator ORE1. Plant Cell. 32, 1610–1625. doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00810, PMID: 32111670

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dutta, M., Laishram, R., Gowda, N. R., Sushmitha, J., and Meena, N. L. (2024). “Plant signaling and response to abiotic stress,” in Molecular dynamics of plant stress and its management (Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore), 211–241.

Google Scholar

Edel, K. H. and Kudla, J. (2016). Integration of calcium and ABA signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 33, 83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.06.010, PMID: 27366827

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fedorowicz-Strońska, O., Koczyk, G., Kaczmarek, M., Krajewski, P., and Sadowski, J. (2017). Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression profiles of calcium-dependent protein kinase genes in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J. Appl. Genet. 58, 11–22. doi: 10.1007/s13353-016-0357-2, PMID: 27447459

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fedosejevs, E. T., Gerdis, S. A., Ying, S., Pyc, M., Anderson, E. M., Snedden, W. A., et al. (2016). The calcium-dependent protein kinase RcCDPK2 phosphorylates sucrose synthase at Ser11 in developing castor oil seeds. Biochem. J. 473, 3667–3682. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160531, PMID: 27512054

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, X., Cox, K. L., Jr., and He, P. (2014). Functions of calcium-dependent protein kinases in plant innate immunity. Plants. 3, 160–176. doi: 10.3390/plants3010160, PMID: 27135498

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, W., Wang, S., Jiang, T., Hu, H., Gao, R., Zhou, M., et al. (2025). Chromosome-scale and haplotype-resolved genome assembly of Populus trichocarpa. Hortic. Res. 12, uhaf012. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhaf012, PMID: 40093378

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, W., Xu, F. C., Guo, D. D., Zhao, J. R., Liu, J., Guo, Y. W., et al. (2018). Calcium-dependent protein kinases in cotton: insights into early plant responses to salt stress. BMC Plant Biol. 18, 1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1230-8, PMID: 29343239

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, Y., Zhang, Y., Ji, X., Wang, J., Suo, N., Liu, J., et al. (2023). Identification of Dioscorea opposite Thunb. CDPK gene family reveals that DoCDPK20 is related to heat resistance. PeerJ. 11, e16110. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16110, PMID: 37744230

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, P., Zou, Y., Yang, M., Li, L., Qi, Y., Guo, J., et al. (2025). Identification of the AKCDPK gene family and AkCDPK15 functional analysis under drought and salt stress. PloS One 20, e0325453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325453, PMID: 40498756

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Geng, A., Lian, W., Wang, Y., Liu, M., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., et al. (2024). Molecular mechanisms and regulatory pathways underlying drought stress response in rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 1185. doi: 10.3390/ijms25021185, PMID: 38256261

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gromadka, R., Cieśla, J., Olszak, K., Szczegielniak, J., Muszyńska, G., and Polkowska-Kowalczyk, L. (2018). Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling of calcium-dependent protein kinases in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Plant Growth Regul. 84, 303–315. doi: 10.1007/s10725-017-0341-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Grossi, C. E. M., Santin, F., Quintana, S. A., Fantino, E., and Ulloa, R. M. (2022). Calcium-dependent protein kinase 2 plays a positive role in the salt stress response in potato. Plant Cell Rep. 41, 535–548. doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02676-7, PMID: 33651205

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, B., Dong, X., Shi, C., Wang, Z., Chen, J., Li, P., et al. (2024). Genome-wide identification and characterization of Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase (CDPK) gene family in autotetraploid cultivated alfalfa (Medicago sativa subsp. sativa) and expression analysis under abiotic stresses. BMC Plant Biol. 24, 1241. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05993-7, PMID: 39716096

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hao, F., Cui, Z., Dong, X., Gao, Y., Wang, R., Zhang, H., et al. (2024). Exogenous calcium enhances castor tolerance to saline–alkaline stress by regulating antioxidant enzyme activity and activating Ca2+ and ROS signaling crosstalk. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 12717. doi: 10.3390/ijms252312717, PMID: 39684428

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hettenhausen, C., Sun, G., He, Y., Zhuang, H., Sun, T., Qi, J., et al. (2016). Genome-wide identification of calcium-dependent protein kinases in soybean and analyses of their transcriptional responses to insect herbivory and drought stress. Sci. Rep. 6, 18973. doi: 10.1038/srep18973, PMID: 26733237

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hou, X., Zhang, Y., Shi, X., Duan, W., Fu, X., Liu, J., et al. (2024). TaCDPK1-5A positively regulates drought response through modulating osmotic stress responsive-associated processes in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant Cell Rep. 43, 256. doi: 10.1007/s00299-024-03344-2, PMID: 39375249

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, X., Cheng, J., Lu, M., Fang, T., Zhu, Y., Li, Z., et al. (2024). Ca2+-independent ZmCPK2 is inhibited by Ca2+-dependent ZmCPK17 during drought response in maize. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 66, 1313–1333. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13675, PMID: 38751035

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, W., Hou, X., Xia, Z., Yan, Y., Wei, Y., Wang, L., et al. (2016). Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of the calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family in cassava. Mol. Genet. Genomics 291, 241–253. doi: 10.1007/s00438-015-1103-x, PMID: 26272723

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, Z., Lv, X., Xia, X., Zhou, J., Shi, K., Yu, J., et al. (2016). Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of calcium-dependent protein kinase in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 469. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00469, PMID: 27092168

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, C. H., Wang, P. Q., Zhang, P. P., Nie, X. M., Li, B. B., Tai, L., et al. (2020). NADPH oxidases: the vital performers and center hubs during plant growth and signaling. Cells. 9, 437. doi: 10.3390/cells9020437, PMID: 32069961

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, H. and Xiong, L. (2014). Genetic engineering and breeding of drought-resistant crops. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 65, 715–741. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040000, PMID: 24313844

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, S., Chen, M., Zhao, Y., Wen, X., Guo, Z., and Lu, S. (2020). CBL4-CIPK5 pathway confers salt but not drought and chilling tolerance by regulating ion homeostasis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 179, 104230. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104230

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Iqbal, Z., Memon, A. G., Ahmad, A., and Iqbal, M. S. (2022). Calcium mediated cold acclimation in plants: underlying signaling and molecular mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 855559. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.855559, PMID: 35574126

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ishida, S., Yuasa, T., Nakata, M., and Takahashi, Y. (2008). A tobacco calcium-dependent protein kinase, CDPK1, regulates the transcription factor REPRESSION OF SHOOT GROWTH in response to gibberellins. Plant Cell. 20, 3273–3288. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.057489, PMID: 19106376

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ivashuta, S., Liu, J., Liu, J., Lohar, D. P., Haridas, S., Bucciarelli, B., et al. (2005). RNA interference identifies a calcium-dependent protein kinase involved in Medicago truncatula root development. Plant Cell. 17, 2911–2921. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.035394, PMID: 16199614

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jafar, J., Hassan, H., Shabala, S., and Ouyang, B. (2022). Signaling molecules and transcriptional reprogramming for stomata operation under salt stress. Adv. Bot. Res. 103, 163–193. doi: 10.1016/bs.abr.2022.02.013

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jalmi, S. K., Bhagat, P. K., Verma, D., Noryang, S., Tayyeba, S., Singh, K., et al. (2018). Traversing the links between heavy metal stress and plant signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00012, PMID: 29459874

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, S., Zhang, D., Wang, L., Pan, J., Liu, Y., Kong, X., et al. (2013). A maize calcium-dependent protein kinase gene, ZmCPK4, positively regulated abscisic acid signaling and enhanced drought stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 71, 112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.07.004, PMID: 23911729

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kadota, Y., Sklenar, J., Derbyshire, P., Stransfeld, L., Asai, S., Ntoukakis, V., et al. (2014). Direct regulation of the NADPH oxidase RBOHD by the PRR-associated kinase BIK1 during plant immunity. Mol. Cell. 54, 43–55. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.021, PMID: 24630626

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaushal, M. (2020). Insights into microbially induced salt tolerance and endurance mechanisms (STEM) in plants. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1518. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01518, PMID: 32982994

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keyster, M., Niekerk, L. A., Basson, G., Carelse, M., Bakare, O., Ludidi, N., et al. (2020). Decoding heavy metal stress signaling in plants: towards improved food security and safety. Plants. 9, 1781. doi: 10.3390/plants9121781, PMID: 33339160

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Khan, N. (2025). Molecular insights into ABA-mediated regulation of stress tolerance and development in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26, 7872. doi: 10.3390/ijms26167872, PMID: 40869193

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, J. S., Jeon, B. W., and Kim, J. (2021). Signaling peptides regulating abiotic stress responses in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 704490. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.704490, PMID: 34349774

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kiselev, K. V. and Dubrovina, A. S. (2025). The role of calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) genes in plant stress resistance and secondary metabolism regulation. Plant Growth Regul., 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s10725-025-01295-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Klimecka, M. and Muszyńska, G. (2007). Structure and functions of plant calcium-dependent protein kinases. Acta Biochim. Pol. 54, 219–233. doi: 10.18388/abp.2007_3242

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuang, J., Liu, J., Mei, J., Wang, C., Hu, H., Zhang, Y., et al. (2017). A Class II small heat shock protein OsHsp18. 0 plays positive roles in both biotic and abiotic defense responses in rice. Sci. Rep. 7, 11333. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11882-x, PMID: 28900229

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lehmann, S., Funck, D., Szabados, L., and Rentsch, D. (2010). Proline metabolism and transport in plant development. Amino Acids 39, 949–962. doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0525-3, PMID: 20204435

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, M., Chen, X., Huang, W., Li, Y., Liu, Q., Yan, W., et al. (2023). Genome-wide analysis of the CDPK gene family and their important roles response to cold stress in white clover. Plant Signal Behav. 18, 2213924. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2023.2213924, PMID: 37202838

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X., Gao, Y., Wu, W., Chen, L., and Wang, Y. (2022). Two calcium-dependent protein kinases enhance maize drought tolerance by activating anion channel ZmSLAC1 in guard cells. Plant Biotechnol. J. 20, 143–157. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13701, PMID: 34498364

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, P. and Liu, J. (2021). Protein phosphorylation in plant cell signaling. Plant Phosphoproteomics: Methods Protoc., 45–71. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1625-3_3, PMID: 34270045

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, A., Wang, X., Leseberg, C. H., Jia, J., and Mao, L. (2008). Biotic and abiotic stress responses through calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) signaling in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ). Plant Signal Behav. 3, 654–656. doi: 10.4161/psb.3.9.5757, PMID: 19704816

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, L. B., Yu, D. W., Zhao, F. L., Pang, C. Y., Song, M. Z., ling, W. H., et al. (2015). Genome-wide analysis of the calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family in Gossypium raimondii. J. Integr. Agric. 14, 29–41. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60780-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y. N., Lei, C., Yang, Q., Yu, X., Li, S., Sun, Y., et al. (2024). Identification and expression analysis of calcium-dependent protein kinase family in oat (Avena sativa L.) and their functions in response to saline-alkali stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 15, 1395696. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1395696, PMID: 39450084

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liese, A. and Romeis, T. (2013). Biochemical regulation of in vivo function of plant calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPK). Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Molecular Cell Res. 1833, 1582–1589. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.10.024, PMID: 23123193

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Linghu, B., Xu, Z., Chu, Y., Yan, Y., Nie, X., and Weining, S. (2023). Genome-wide analysis of calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) family and functional characterization of TaCDPK25-U in response to drought stress in wheat. Environ. Exp. Bot. 209, 105277. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2023.105277

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Li, X., Jia, D., Qi, L., Jing, R., Hao, J., et al. (2024). ZmCRK1 negatively regulates maize’s response to drought stress by phosphorylating plasma membrane H+-ATPase ZmMHA2. New Phytologist. 244, 1362–1376. doi: 10.1111/nph.20093, PMID: 39219030

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, H., Song, S., Zhang, H., Li, Y., Niu, L., Zhang, J., et al. (2022). Signaling transduction of ABA, ROS, and Ca2+ in plant stomatal closure in response to drought. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 14824. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314824, PMID: 36499153

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, J., Yang, N., Zhu, Y., Chai, Z., Zhang, T., and Li, W. (2022). Genome-wide survey of Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinases (CPKs) in five Brassica species and identification of CPKs induced by Plasmodiophora brassicae in B. rapa, B. oleracea and B. napus. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 1067723. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1067723, PMID: 36479517

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ludwig, A. A., Romeis, T., and Jones, J. D. G. (2004). CDPK-mediated signaling pathways: specificity and cross-talk. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 181–188. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh008, PMID: 14623901

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, P., Liu, J., Yang, X., and Ma, R. (2013). Genome-wide identification of the maize calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 169, 2111–2125. doi: 10.1007/s12010-013-0125-2, PMID: 23397323

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, S. Y. and Wu, W. H. (2007). AtCPK23 functions in Arabidopsis responses to drought and salt stresses. Plant Mol. Biol. 65, 511–518. doi: 10.1007/s11103-007-9187-2, PMID: 17541706

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mahmood, T., Khalid, S., Abdullah, M., Ahmed, Z., Shah, M. K. N., Ghafoor, A., et al. (2019). Insights into drought stress signaling in plants and the molecular genetic basis of cotton drought tolerance. Cells. 9, 105. doi: 10.3390/cells9010105, PMID: 31906215

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Maierhofer, T., Diekmann, M., Offenborn, J. N., Lind, C., Bauer, H., Hashimoto, K., et al. (2014). Site-and kinase-specific phosphorylation-mediated activation of SLAC1, a guard cell anion channel stimulated by abscisic acid. Sci. Signal 7, ra86–ra86. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2005703, PMID: 25205850

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mallick, B., Kumari, M., Pradhan, S. K., C, P., Acharya, G. C., Naresh, P., et al. (2022). Genome-wide analysis and characterization of heat shock transcription factors (Hsfs) in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Funct. Integr. Genomics 22, 743–756. doi: 10.1007/s10142-022-00875-3, PMID: 35718806

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mao, J., Wang, Y., Wang, B., Li, J., Zhang, C., Zhang, W., et al. (2023). High-quality haplotype-resolved genome assembly of cultivated octoploid strawberry. Hortic. Res. 10, uhad002. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhad002, PMID: 37077373

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Marques, J., Matiolli, C. C., and Abreu, I. A. (2022). Visualization of a curated Oryza sativa L. CDPKs Protein-Protein Interaction Network (CDPK-OsPPIN). MicroPubl Biol. 2022, 10–17912. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000513, PMID: 35098050

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mee Yoon, G., Sun Cho, H., Jung Ha, H., Ryol Liu, J., and sook, P. L. H. (1999). Characterization of NtCDPK1, a calcium-dependent protein kinase gene in Nicotiana tabacum, and the activity of its encoded protein. Plant Mol. Biol. 39, 991–1001. doi: 10.1023/A:1006170512542, PMID: 10344204

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Michael, P. S., Mwakyusa, L., Sanga, H. G., Shitindi, M. J., Kwaslema, D. R., Herzog, M., et al. (2023). Floods stress in lowland rice production: experiences of rice farmers in Kilombero and Lower-RuFiji floodplains, Tanzania. Front. Sustain Food Syst. 7, 1206754. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1206754

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mittal, S., Mallikarjuna, M. G., Rao, A. R., Jain, P. A., Dash, P. K., and Thirunavukkarasu, N. (2017). Comparative analysis of CDPK family in maize, Arabidopsis, rice, and sorghum revealed potential targets for drought tolerance improvement. Front. Chem. 5, 115. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2017.00115, PMID: 29312925

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mohanta, T. K., Mohanta, N., Mohanta, Y. K., and Bae, H. (2015). Genome-wide identification of calcium dependent protein kinase gene family in plant lineage shows presence of novel DxD and DEL motifs in EF-hand domain. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 1146. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01146, PMID: 26734045

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mohanta, T. K. and Sinha, A. K. (2016). Role of calcium-dependent protein kinases during abiotic stress tolerance. Abiotic Stress Response Plants, 185–206. doi: 10.1002/9783527694570.ch9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mori, I. C., Murata, Y., Yang, Y., Munemasa, S., Wang, Y. F., Andreoli, S., et al. (2006). CDPKs CPK6 and CPK3 function in ABA regulation of guard cell S-type anion-and Ca2+-permeable channels and stomatal closure. PloS Biol. 4, e327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040327, PMID: 17032064

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mu, Z., Xu, M., Manda, T., Yang, L., Hwarari, D., and Zhu, F. Y. (2024). Genomic survey and evolution analysis of calcium-dependent protein kinases in plants and their stress-responsive patterns in populus. BMC Genomics 25, 1108. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10962-3, PMID: 39563234

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Naeem, M., Amir, M., Manzoor, H., Rasul, S., and Athar H ur, R. (2019). “Role of calcium in conferring abiotic stress tolerance,” in Plant tolerance to environmental stress (CRC Press), 205–218.

Google Scholar

Pan, R., Buitrago, S., Feng, Z., Abou-Elwafa, S. F., Xu, L., Li, C., et al. (2022). HvbZIP21, a novel transcription factor from wild barley confers drought tolerance by modulating ROS scavenging. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 878459. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.878459, PMID: 35528943

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Patil, A. M., Pawar, B. D., Wagh, S. G., Markad, N. R., Bhute, N. K., Shinde, H., et al. (2024). Unravelling abiotic stress physiology in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): Biotechnological interventions in mitigating abiotic stress. doi: 10.20944/preprints202405.0751.v1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Paul, A. L., Sehnke, P. C., and Ferl, R. J. (2005). Isoform-specific subcellular localization among 14-3–3 proteins in Arabidopsis seems to be driven by client interactions. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16, 1735–1743. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e04-09-0839, PMID: 15659648

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Petrov, V., Hille, J., Mueller-Roeber, B., and Gechev, T. S. (2015). ROS-mediated abiotic stress-induced programmed cell death in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 69. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00069, PMID: 25741354

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Priyadarshan, P. M. (2019). Breeding for abiotic stress adaptation. In: Plant breeding: classical to modern. Springer; p, 413–455. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-7095-3

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Punniyamoorthy, D. and Jegadeesan, S. (2025). Whole genome sequencing reveals transcriptional and translational elements potentially regulating biotic and abiotic stress responses in cowpea. Sci. Rep. 15, 32913. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-18334-x, PMID: 40998973

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Quan, R., Lin, H., Mendoza, I., Zhang, Y., Cao, W., Yang, Y., et al. (2007). SCABP8/CBL10, a putative calcium sensor, interacts with the protein kinase SOS2 to protect Arabidopsis shoots from salt stress. Plant Cell. 19, 1415–1431. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.042291, PMID: 17449811

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ravi, B., Foyer, C. H., and Pandey, G. K. (2023). The integration of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and calcium signaling in abiotic stress responses. Plant Cell Environ. 46, 1985–2006. doi: 10.1111/pce.14596, PMID: 37132157

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ray, S., Agarwal, P., Arora, R., Kapoor, S., and Tyagi, A. K. (2007). Expression analysis of calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family during reproductive development and abiotic stress conditions in rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Mol. Genet. Genomics 278, 493–505. doi: 10.1007/s00438-007-0267-4, PMID: 17636330

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ren, H., Zhang, Y., Zhong, M., Hussian, J., Tang, Y., Liu, S., et al. (2023). Calcium signaling-mediated transcriptional reprogramming during abiotic stress response in plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 136, 210. doi: 10.1007/s00122-023-04455-2, PMID: 37728763

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ronzier, E., Corratgé-Faillie, C., Sanchez, F., Brière, C., and Xiong, T. C. (2021). Ca2+-dependent protein kinase 6 enhances KAT2 shaker channel activity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 1596. doi: 10.3390/ijms22041596, PMID: 33562460

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Saidi, Y., Finka, A., Muriset, M., Bromberg, Z., Weiss, Y. G., Maathuis, F. J. M., et al. (2009). The heat shock response in moss plants is regulated by specific calcium-permeable channels in the plasma membrane. Plant Cell. 21, 2829–2843. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.065318, PMID: 19773386

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Santin, F., Bhogale, S., Fantino, E., Grandellis, C., Banerjee, A. K., and Ulloa, R. M. (2017). Solanum tuberosum StCDPK1 is regulated by miR390 at the posttranscriptional level and phosphorylates the auxin efflux carrier StPIN4 in vitro, a potential downstream target in potato development. Physiol. Plant 159, 244–261. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12517, PMID: 27716933

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schulz, P., Herde, M., and Romeis, T. (2013). Calcium-dependent protein kinases: hubs in plant stress signaling and development. Plant Physiol. 163, 523–530. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.222539, PMID: 24014579

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, S., Li, S., Asim, M., Mao, J., Xu, D., Ullah, Z., et al. (2018). The Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) and their roles in plant growth regulation and abiotic stress responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 1900. doi: 10.3390/ijms19071900, PMID: 29958430

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, G. and Zhu, X. (2024). Transcriptome sequencing analysis of overexpressed SikCDPK1 in tobacco reveals mechanisms of cold stress response. BMC Genomics 25, 971. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10801-5, PMID: 39415130

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shu, B., Jue, D., Zhang, F., Zhang, D., Liu, C., Wu, Q., et al. (2020). Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the citrus calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) genes in response to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization and drought. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equipment. 34, 1304–1314. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2020.1837011

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

shuai, T. S., shan, L. G., he, S. Y., and Jia, C. (2009). Cloning and expression of calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) gene family in common tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Agric. Sci. China. 8, 1448–1457. doi: 10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60358-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva, P. and Gerós, H. (2009). Regulation by salt of vacuolar H+-ATPase and H+-pyrophosphatase activities and Na+/H+ exchange. Plant Signal Behav. 4, 718–726. doi: 10.4161/psb.4.8.9236, PMID: 19820346

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, A., Sagar, S., and Biswas, D. K. (2017). Calcium dependent protein kinase, a versatile player in plant stress management and development. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 36, 336–352. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2018.1428438

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Soma, F., Takahashi, F., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., and Shinozaki, K. (2021). Cellular phosphorylation signaling and gene expression in drought stress responses: ABA-dependent and ABA-independent regulatory systems. Plants. 10, 756. doi: 10.3390/plants10040756, PMID: 33924307

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, S., Jiang, Y., Zhu, X., Yu, S., Wang, F., Xue, L., et al. (2024). Calcium-dependent protein kinases 5 and 13 enhance salt tolerance in rice by directly activating OsMPK3/6 kinases. Plant Physiol. 196, 3033–3047. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiae520, PMID: 39361658

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Szczegielniak, J., Borkiewicz, L., Szurmak, B., Lewandowska-Gnatowska, E., Statkiewicz, M., Klimecka, M., et al. (2012). Maize calcium-dependent protein kinase (ZmCPK11): local and systemic response to wounding, regulation by touch and components of jasmonate signaling. Physiol. Plant 146, 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01587.x, PMID: 22289134

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tanpure, R. S., Ghuge, S. A., Dawkar, V. V., and Kumar, A. (2021). “Signaling responses and their role in the mitigation of abiotic stresses,” in Stress tolerance in horticultural crops (Woodhead Publishing), 327–346.

Google Scholar

Tong, X., Cao, A., Wang, F., Chen, X., Xie, S., Shen, H., et al. (2019). Calcium-dependent protein kinase genes in Glycyrrhiza Uralensis appear to be involved in promoting the biosynthesis of glycyrrhizic acid and flavonoids under salt stress. Molecules. 24, 1837. doi: 10.3390/molecules24091837, PMID: 31086079

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tong, T., Li, Q., Jiang, W., Chen, G., Xue, D., Deng, F., et al. (2021). Molecular evolution of calcium signaling and transport in plant adaptation to abiotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 12308. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212308, PMID: 34830190

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tuskan, G. A., Difazio, S., Jansson, S., Bohlmann, J., Grigoriev, I., Hellsten, U., et al. (2006). The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. Gray). Sci. (1979). 313, 1596–1604. doi: 10.1126/science.1128691, PMID: 16973872

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Uga, Y., Sugimoto, K., Ogawa, S., Rane, J., Ishitani, M., Hara, N., et al. (2013). Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nat. Genet. 45, 1097–1102. doi: 10.1038/ng.2725, PMID: 23913002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Urao, T., Katagiri, T., Mizoguchi, T., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Hayashida, N., and Shinozaki, K. (1994). Two genes that encode Ca 2+-dependent protein kinases are induced by drought and high-salt stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Gen. Genet. 244, 331–340. doi: 10.1007/BF00286684, PMID: 8078458

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Valmonte, G. R., Arthur, K., Higgins, C. M., and MacDiarmid, R. M. (2014). Calcium-dependent protein kinases in plants: evolution, expression and function. Plant Cell Physiol. 55, 551–569. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pct200, PMID: 24363288

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

van Dieren, A., Schwarzenbacher, R. E., Sonnewald, S., Bittner, A., and Vothknecht, U. C. (2024). Analysis of abiotic and biotic stress-induced Ca2+ transients in the crop species Solanum tuberosum. Sci. Rep. 14, 27625. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79134-3, PMID: 39528594

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Zelm, E., Zhang, Y., and Testerink, C. (2020). Salt tolerance mechanisms of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71, 403–433. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100005, PMID: 32167791

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Vega-Muñoz, I., Duran-Flores, D., Fernández-Fernández, Á.D., Heyman, J., Ritter, A., and Stael, S. (2020). Breaking bad news: dynamic molecular mechanisms of wound response in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 610445. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.610445, PMID: 33363562

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Veremeichik, G. N., Brodovskaya, E. V., Grigorchuk, V. P., Butovets, E. S., Lukyanchuk, L. M., and Bulgakov, V. P. (2022). ABA-dependent regulation of calcium-dependent protein kinase gene GmCDPK5 in cultivated and wild soybeans. Life. 12, 1576. doi: 10.3390/life12101576, PMID: 36295011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Vivek, P. J., Tuteja, N., and Soniya, E. V. (2013). CDPK1 from ginger promotes salinity and drought stress tolerance without yield penalty by improving growth and photosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum. PloS One 8, e76392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076392, PMID: 24194837

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Vodiasova, E., Meger, Y., Uppe, V., Tsiupka, V., Chelebieva, E., and Smykov, A. (2024). Class III peroxidases in the peach (Prunus persica): genome-wide identification and functional analysis. Plants. 13, 127. doi: 10.3390/plants13010127, PMID: 38202438

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, P., Hsu, C. C., Du, Y., Zhu, P., Zhao, C., Fu, X., et al. (2020). Mapping proteome-wide targets of protein kinases in plant stress responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 3270–3280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919901117, PMID: 31992638

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, G., Hu, L., Zhang, J., Zhai, M., Jia, Z., Mo, Z., et al. (2025). Comprehensive genomic analysis of the CDPK gene family in pecan (Carya illinoinensis) and their potential roles in salt stress response. Plants. 14, 540. doi: 10.3390/plants14040540, PMID: 40006798

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Li, J., Jia, C., Xu, B., and Jin, Z. (2016). Molecular cloning and expression analysis of eight calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) genes from banana (Musa acuminata L. AAA group, cv. Cavendish). South Afr. J. Botany. 104, 134–141. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2015.10.004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, F., Liang, S., Wang, G., Hu, T., Fu, C., Wang, Q., et al. (2024). CRISPR–Cas9-mediated construction of a cotton CDPK mutant library for identification of insect-resistance genes. Plant Commun. 5. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.101047, PMID: 39138865

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Liu, X., Su, Y., and Shen, H. (2025). Rice responses to abiotic stress: Key proteins and molecular mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26, 896. doi: 10.3390/ijms26030896, PMID: 39940666

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, J. P., Xu, Y. P., Munyampundu, J. P., Liu, T. Y., and Cai, X. Z. (2016). Calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) and CDPK-related kinase (CRK) gene families in tomato: genome-wide identification and functional analyses in disease resistance. Mol. Genet. Genomics 291, 661–676. doi: 10.1007/s00438-015-1137-0, PMID: 26520101

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, B., Xue, P., Zhang, Y., Zhan, X., Wu, W., Yu, P., et al. (2024). OsCPK12 phosphorylates OsCATA and OsCATC to regulate H2O2 homeostasis and improve oxidative stress tolerance in rice. Plant Commun. 5. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100780, PMID: 38130060

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Weckwerth, P., Ehlert, B., and Romeis, T. (2015). Zm CPK 1, a calcium-independent kinase member of the Z ea mays CDPK gene family, functions as a negative regulator in cold stress signaling. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 544–558. doi: 10.1111/pce.12414, PMID: 25052912

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, S., Hu, W., Deng, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Zhao, X., et al. (2014). A rice calcium-dependent protein kinase OsCPK9 positively regulates drought stress tolerance and spikelet fertility. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 133. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-133, PMID: 24884869

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Witte, C. P., Keinath, N., Dubiella, U., Demouliere, R., Seal, A., and Romeis, T. (2010). Tobacco calcium-dependent protein kinases are differentially phosphorylated in vivo as part of a kinase cascade that regulates stress response. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 9740–9748. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.052126, PMID: 20118232

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, J., Li, Y., Yin, H., Zhao, L., Xu, C., Fu, X., et al. (2025). Plant Heat Shock Protein Hsp90 enhances stress resistance through integrating protein quality control, chloroplast protection, hormone signal network, and immune defense. J. Exp. Bot., eraf447. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraf447, PMID: 41078076

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, P., Wang, W., Duan, W., Li, Y., and Hou, X. (2017). Comprehensive analysis of the CDPK-SnRK superfamily genes in Chinese cabbage and its evolutionary implications in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 162. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00162, PMID: 28239387

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, X., Yang, M., Sui, J., Qi, J., Fang, Y., Hu, S., et al. (2017). The calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) and CDPK-related kinase gene families in Hevea brasiliensis—Comparison with five other plant species in structure, evolution, and expression. FEBS Open Bio. 7, 4–24. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12163, PMID: 28097084

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiong, R., Liu, S., Considine, M. J., Siddique, K. H. M., Lam, H., and Chen, Y. (2021). Root system architecture, physiological and transcriptional traits of soybean (Glycine max L.) in response to water deficit: A review. Physiol. Plant 172, 405–418. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13201, PMID: 32880966

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, X., Liu, M., Lu, L., He, M., Qu, W., Xu, Q., et al. (2015). Genome-wide analysis and expression of the calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family in cucumber. Mol. Genet. Genomics 290, 1403–1414. doi: 10.1007/s00438-015-1002-1, PMID: 25687625

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, M., Chai, M., Li, L., Dong, Z., Jin, H., Tan, M., et al. (2024). Calcium-dependent protein kinase ghCDPK16 exerts a positive regulatory role in enhancing drought tolerance in cotton. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 8308. doi: 10.3390/ijms25158308, PMID: 39125876

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, M., Yu, X., Zhou, G., Sun, D., Hu, Y., Huang, C., et al. (2022). GhCDPK60 positively regulates drought stress tolerance in both transgenic Arabidopsis and cotton by regulating proline content and ROS level. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 1072584. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1072584, PMID: 36531339

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Wang, Q., Chen, Q., Yin, X., Qian, M., Sun, X., et al. (2017). Genome-wide survey indicates diverse physiological roles of the barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) calcium-dependent protein kinase genes. Sci. Rep. 7, 5306. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05646-w, PMID: 28706292

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, H., You, C., Yang, S., Zhang, Y., Yang, F., Li, X., et al. (2021). The role of calcium/calcium-dependent protein kinases signal pathway in pollen tube growth. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 633293. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.633293, PMID: 33767718

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ying, S., Hill, A. T., Pyc, M., Anderson, E. M., Snedden, W. A., Mullen, R. T., et al. (2017). Regulatory phosphorylation of bacterial-type PEP carboxylase by the Ca2+-dependent protein kinase RcCDPK1 in developing castor oil seeds. Plant Physiol. 174, 1012–1027. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00288, PMID: 28363991

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yip Delormel, T. and Boudsocq, M. (2019). Properties and functions of calcium-dependent protein kinases and their relatives in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 224, 585–604. doi: 10.1111/nph.16088, PMID: 31369160

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, T. F., Zhao, W. Y., Fu, J. D., Liu, Y. W., Chen, M., Zhou, Y. B., et al. (2018). Genome-wide analysis of CDPK family in foxtail millet and determination of SiCDPK24 functions in drought stress. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 651. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00651, PMID: 30093908

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, P., Yang, T., and Poovaiah, B. W. (2018). Calcium signaling-mediated plant response to cold stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 3896. doi: 10.3390/ijms19123896, PMID: 30563125

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yue, J. Y., Jiao, J. L., Wang, W. W., and Wang, H. Z. (2022). The calcium-dependent protein kinase TaCDPK27 positively regulates salt tolerance in wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 7341. doi: 10.3390/ijms23137341, PMID: 35806346

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, M., Liu, Y., He, Q., Chai, M., Huang, Y., Chen, F., et al. (2020). Genome-wide investigation of calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family in pineapple: Evolution and expression profiles during development and stress. BMC Genomics 21, 1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6501-8, PMID: 31973690

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Liu, W. Z., Zhang, Y., Deng, M., Niu, F., Yang, B., et al. (2014). Identification, expression and interaction analyses of calcium-dependent protein kinase (CPK) genes in canola (Brassica napus L.). BMC Genomics 15, 211. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-211, PMID: 24646378

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Sun, L., Wang, Y., Li, B., Li, X., Ye, Z., et al. (2024). A calcium-dependent protein kinase regulates the defense response in Citrus sinensis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 37, 459–466. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-12-23-0208-R, PMID: 38597923

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Wang, L., Chen, X., Zhao, L., Liu, X., Wang, Y., et al. (2022). The protein phosphatase 2C clade A TaPP2CA interact with calcium-dependent protein kinases, TaCDPK5/TaCDPK9-1, that phosphorylate TabZIP60 transcription factor from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Sci. 321, 111304. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111304, PMID: 35696905

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Wei, C., Yang, X., Chen, H., Yang, Y., Mo, Y., et al. (2017). Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of calcium-dependent protein kinase and its related kinase gene families in melon (Cucumis melo L. ). PloS One 12, e0176352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176352, PMID: 28437432

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Xu, J., Li, R., Ge, Y., Li, Y., and Li, R. (2023). Plants’ response to abiotic stress: Mechanisms and strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 10915. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310915, PMID: 37446089

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Deng, C., Deng, S., Li, N., Zhao, C., et al. (2018). The Arabidopsis Ca2+-dependent protein kinase CPK12 is involved in plant response to salt stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 4062. doi: 10.3390/ijms19124062, PMID: 30558245

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, C., Wang, P., Si, T., Hsu, C. C., Wang, L., Zayed, O., et al. (2017). MAP kinase cascades regulate the cold response by modulating ICE1 protein stability. Dev. Cell. 43, 618–629. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.09.024, PMID: 29056551

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, L., Xie, B., Hou, Y., Zhao, Y., Zheng, Y., and Jin, P. (2022). Genome-wide identification of the CDPK gene family reveals the CDPK-RBOH pathway potential involved in improving chilling tolerance in peach fruit. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 191, 10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.09.015, PMID: 36174282

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, S., Zhang, Q., Liu, M., Zhou, H., Ma, C., and Wang, P. (2021). Regulation of plant responses to salt stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 4609. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094609, PMID: 33924753

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Q., Priyadarshani, S. V. G. N., Qin, R., Cheng, H., Luo, T., Wai, M. H., et al. (2024). AcWRKY28 mediated activation of AcCPK genes confers salt tolerance in pineapple (Ananas comosus). Hortic. Plant J. 10, 398–412. doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2023.05.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, J. K. (2002). Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53, 247–273. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329, PMID: 12221975

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, H., He, M., Jahan, M. S., Wu, J., Gu, Q., Shu, S., et al. (2021). CsCDPK6, a CsSAMS1-interacting protein, affects polyamine/ethylene biosynthesis in cucumber and enhances salt tolerance by overexpression in tobacco. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 11133. doi: 10.3390/ijms222011133, PMID: 34681792

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, L., Jin, X., Xie, Q., Yao, Q., Wang, X., and Li, H. (2018). Calcium-dependent protein kinase family genes involved in ethylene-induced natural rubber production in different Hevea brasiliensis cultivars. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 947. doi: 10.3390/ijms19040947, PMID: 29565813

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, S. Y., Yu, X. C., Wang, X. J., Zhao, R., Li, Y., Fan, R. C., et al. (2007). Two calcium-dependent protein kinases, CPK4 and CPK11, regulate abscisic acid signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 19, 3019–3036. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.050666, PMID: 17921317

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zou, Z., Guo, J., Zheng, Y., Xiao, Y., and Guo, A. (2022). Genomic analysis of LEA genes in Carica papaya and insight into lineage-specific family evolution in Brassicales. Life. 12, 1453. doi: 10.3390/life12091453, PMID: 36143489

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zou, J. J., Li, X. D., Ratnasekera, D., Wang, C., Liu, W. X., Song, L. F., et al. (2015). Arabidopsis CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE8 and CATALASE3 function in abscisic acid-mediated signaling and H2O2 homeostasis in stomatal guard cells under drought stress. Plant Cell. 27, 1445–1460. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00144, PMID: 25966761

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zou, J. J., Wei, F. J., Wang, C., Wu, J. J., Ratnasekera, D., Liu, W. X., et al. (2010). Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase CPK10 functions in abscisic acid-and Ca2+-mediated stomatal regulation in response to drought stress. Plant Physiol. 154, 1232–1243. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.157545, PMID: 20805328

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zubair, A., Zaib, S., and Ebaid, M. S. (2025). Protein networks: integrating pathways for plant heat stress adaptation. Funct. Integr. Genomics 25, 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s10142-025-01685-z, PMID: 40890323

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zuo, R., Hu, R., Chai, G., Xu, M., Qi, G., Kong, Y., et al. (2013). Genome-wide identification, classification, and expression analysis of CDPK and its closely related gene families in poplar (Populus trichocarpa). Mol. Biol. Rep. 40, 2645–2662. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-2351-z, PMID: 23242656

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: abiotic stress, calcium-dependent protein kinases, climate-resilient crops, phosphorylation, reactive oxygen species, plant stress response, cross-talk, transcription factors

Citation: Azupio S, Wang Y, Obeng J, Issah AK, Chu J, Zhang H, Xie Q and Jiang X (2026) Calcium-dependent protein kinases as central hubs in plant abiotic stress signaling: mechanisms and prospects for crop improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1711405. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1711405

Received: 23 September 2025; Accepted: 04 December 2025; Revised: 03 December 2025;
Published: 30 January 2026.

Edited by:

Meng Jiang, Zhejiang University, China

Reviewed by:

Jayanti Tokas, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India
Farhan Goher, Guangdong Academy of Sciences (GDAS), China
Qingchen Luo, Hubei University of Education, China

Copyright © 2026 Azupio, Wang, Obeng, Issah, Chu, Zhang, Xie and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xingyu Jiang, amlhbmd4aW5neXVodUAxNjMuY29t; amlhbmcueGluZ3l1QGdkb3UuZWR1LmNu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.