- 1State Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- 3China CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China
Fusarium wilt, caused by Fusarium oxysporum, poses a significant challenge to tomato production, and sustainable control strategies are urgently needed. Beneficial microbes such as arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and Trichoderma harzianum are widely applied as biocontrol agents, but their combined effects and the underlying immune mechanisms in host plants remain insufficiently understood. In this study, greenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate the impacts of inoculation with Rhizophagus irregularis and T. harzianum, individually and together, on pathogen colonization, nutrient uptake, hormone signaling, and defense responses in tomato. Quantitative PCR revealed that both beneficial fungi significantly reduced F. oxysporum colonization in roots, yet co-inoculation did not provide additional suppression compared with single inoculations. Hormonal profiling showed that pathogen infection alone activated jasmonic acid (JA)-dominated defenses, whereas inoculation with either AM fungi or T. harzianum redirected immunity toward a salicylic acid (SA)-associated state. This shift was characterized by elevated SA accumulation, increased activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO), and reduced levels of JA and its derivatives. Dual inoculation reproduced these hormonal and enzymatic changes but did not further enhance them. Correlation analysis revealed that SA enrichment and PAL/PPO activities were negatively associated with pathogen abundance, whereas JA-related compounds correlated positively with disease severity. These findings suggest that beneficial fungi mitigate Fusarium wilt by reprogramming host immune responses from JA- to SA-dominated pathways, but their combined application does not produce additive benefits. This work provides new insights into the hormonal trade-offs underlying microbe-induced resistance and informs the design of microbial consortia for sustainable plant disease management.
1 Introduction
Plants coexist with diverse soil microorganisms that strongly influence their ability to withstand pathogen attack (Zhang et al., 2025). In response to biotic stresses, they have evolved sophisticated immune strategies to detect pathogens and activate defense responses (Deng and He, 2024). Central to these immune responses are phytohormonal signaling networks (Yang et al., 2015), particularly those mediated by salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA). SA is typically linked to resistance against biotrophic pathogens, while JA is crucial for defending against necrotrophic pathogens and herbivorous organisms (Zust and Agrawal, 2017). Balance between these signaling pathways coordinates the induction of defense-related genes and the activation of protective enzymes such as phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO), which together strengthen the plant’s resistance capacity (Robert-Seilaniantz et al., 2011; Hou and Xu, 2025). Although immune activation often comes with metabolic costs, the ability of plants to fine-tune SA–JA interactions allows dynamic adjustment of defense without fully compromising growth (Li et al., 2022). Importantly, accumulating evidence shows that rhizosphere microorganisms can actively shape these signaling networks, modulating hormone profiles and defense gene expression to enhance host resistance.
Tomato Fusarium wilt, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fo), is a destructive soil-borne disease (Buddenhagen, 2009). Fo exhibits diverse transmission routes, and multiple physiological races, making it challenging to control in agricultural systems (Di Pietro et al., 2003). After root penetration, the pathogen colonizes xylem vessels, where abundant conidia, together with secreted extracellular polysaccharides and toxins such as fusaric acid, block water transport, leading to characteristic wilting and eventual plant death (Srinivas et al., 2019). Yield losses range from 20–30% in infected fields to over 80% in severe outbreaks, posing a significant bottleneck for tomato cultivation (Gordon, 2017).
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are obligate biotrophic organisms that form mutualistic relationships with approximately 80% of land plant species (Shi et al., 2023). Both fossil records and molecular data indicate that this symbiotic association emerged over 400 million years ago. In this mutualism, plants allocate photosynthetic carbon to AM fungi, which enhance nutrient uptake (e.g., phosphorus) via extraradical hyphae (Kiers et al., 2011). AM fungi are often associated with enhanced plant resistance against diverse pathogens, including fungi, bacteria, nematodes, and viruses, although outcomes may vary depending on host–pathogen–fungus interactions (Hao et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2022). For instance, AM fungi inoculation has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of cucumber Fusarium wilt (Ahammed et al., 2020). AM fungi suppress plant diseases through various mechanisms, including competition for infection sites and nutrients, and activation of the plant’s immune system (Weng et al., 2022). This enhanced defense response, often mediated by JA signaling, helps plants resist pathogen invasion, thereby reducing disease severity and improving overall plant health (Zhang et al., 2019).
Trichoderma, a genus of beneficial fungi, is widely used to control soil-borne pathogens (Dutta et al., 2023). Approximately 60% of fungal-based biopesticides globally contain Trichoderma strains (Iqbal et al., 2024). These fungi antagonize pathogens through mycoparasitism, the biosynthesis of bioactive metabolites like plant growth regulators, enzymes, siderophores, antibiotics, secondary metabolites, and niche competition (Mukherjee et al., 2012). T. harzianum isolates have shown antagonistic effects against F. oxysporum, inhibiting mycelial growth and mitigating plant damage (Chohan et al., 2024). Both AM fungi and Trichoderma are well-established biocontrol agents, yet their combined effects remain contentious.
Some studies report synergistic suppression of Fusarium wilt in crops like soybean, where AM fungi-Trichoderma consortia enhance nutrient uptake and photosynthetic efficiency (Eke et al., 2019; Hewedy et al., 2020). Conversely, no additive benefits were observed in banana and melon systems, indicating strain- or host-specific interactions (Castillo et al., 2019). Likewise, in onion, applying AM fungi alone outperformed its combination with T. harzianum (Yağmur et al., 2024). This lack of synergy may result from differing mechanisms of action, where the beneficial effects of each microorganism may overlap or interfere with one another in certain host plants, reducing the potential for enhanced disease suppression (De Jaeger et al., 2011; Thakur et al., 2019). Additionally, host plants may preferentially activate one defense pathway over another, limiting the overall effectiveness of combined inoculations.
AM fungi and Trichoderma enhance plant disease resistance by modulating the host immune system (Salwan et al., 2022). In mycorrhizal plants, AM fungi induce mycorrhiza-induced resistance (MIR), a defense mechanism characterized by complex signal transduction and physiological processes that enhance plant immunity (Cameron et al., 2013). Similarly, Trichoderma suppresses pathogen invasion by modulating the SA signaling pathway, thereby triggering systemic disease resistance in host plants (Grant and Lamb, 2006). MIR is considered a form of induced systemic resistance (ISR), typically mediated by JA signaling pathways in response to rhizosphere microbes or biocontrol agents (Pieterse et al., 2009). In contrast, systemic acquired resistance (SAR), a pathogen-triggered defense response, primarily relies on the SA signaling pathway. Current models suggest that JA confers resistance against necrotrophic pathogens, while SA is critical for combating biotrophic pathogens, often creating an antagonistic trade-off between these defense pathways (Lorenzo and Solano, 2005). However, F. oxysporum, a hemibiotrophic pathogen, presents unique challenges due to its complex infection dynamics, making the interplay of defense pathways under dual inoculation with functional microbes like AM fungi and Trichoderma still unclear.
The biocontrol potential of AM fungi and Trichoderma has been well-documented, yet their combined effects on F. oxysporum colonization and the underlying immune mechanisms in tomato remain insufficiently explored. This study aims to evaluate the impact of AM fungi and Trichoderma inoculation on F. oxysporum colonization in tomato roots using greenhouse pot experiments that simulate natural wilt disease conditions. Additionally, we will investigate the defense mechanisms activated in pathogen-infected tomato plants under AM fungi and Trichoderma inoculation by measuring the concentrations of key plant hormones and evaluating the expression of defense-related genes and enzymes involved in immune responses. We hypothesize that: (1) Inoculation with AM fungi and Trichoderma will reduce F. oxysporum colonization in tomato roots through distinct yet complementary mechanisms, with AM fungi primarily enhancing nutrient acquisition and Trichoderma directly suppressing pathogen growth. (2) Dual inoculation with AM fungi and Trichoderma will synergistically enhance plant resistance to Fusarium wilt by fine-tuning the immune response, shifting plant defense from pathogen-driven mechanisms to microbially-induced resistance. By integrating these approaches, this study aims to elucidate the defense mechanisms activated under the co-inoculation of beneficial fungi and provide practical insights for optimizing microbial consortia in disease management.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Plant material and seed preparation
Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivar ‘Shouhe’ was provided by Shouguang Xinxinran Horticulture Co., Ltd., Shandong, China. The seeds were sterilized on the surface using a 2% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite solution (available chlorine 5.2%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) for 10 minutes, followed by five rinses with sterile deionized water. Afterward, they were placed on damp filter paper and incubated in the dark at 25 ± 1°C for 48 hours to allow germination.
2.2 Soil characteristics and substrate preparation
Soil samples were collected from the Yanqing Field Experiment and Demonstration Station (40°47′N, 116°34′E) in Beijing, China, which is affiliated with the Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The soil was a sandy loam and exhibited the following physicochemical properties: organic matter, 44.21 g kg-¹; NO3--N, 8.28 mg kg-¹; NH4+-N, 5.54 mg kg-¹; total phosphorus, 0.87 g kg-¹; available phosphorus (Olsen-P), 15.01 mg kg-¹; available potassium, 204.06 mg kg-¹; and pH (1:2.5, w/v), 7.68. The soil was passed through a 2 mm sieve and sterilized using γ-radiation at a dose of 20 kGy. Basal fertilizers were applied at 120 mg N kg-¹, and 20 mg P kg-¹ according to Xie et al. (2019).
2.3 Microbial strains and culture conditions
The AM fungal strain Rhizophagus irregularis CGMCC12157 (Ri) used in this study was originally isolated from rhizosphere soil collected in Anhui Province, China. The strain has been stored in the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC), and is also maintained at the Bank of Glomeromycota in China (BGC), Beijing, China. The Ri inoculum was composed of a sterilized mixture of zeolite, sand, and sandy loam soil, enriched with colonized Sorghum bicolor root fragments, extraradical hyphae, and spores at a concentration of 42 spores g-¹.
T. harzianum CFCC82908 (Th) was sourced from the China Forestry Culture Collection Center (CFCC) in Beijing, China. Initially, the fungus was cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 25°C for 7 days. Afterward, hyphal plugs were transferred to 100 mL of potato dextrose broth (PDB) and incubated at 25°C with agitation at 120 rpm for another 7 days. The resulting suspension was passed through a triple-layer sterile gauze, followed by centrifugation at 3000 × g for 5 min (performed twice). It was then washed three times with sterile deionized water and resuspended. The concentration was ultimately set to 3 × 106 conidia mL-¹ determined using a hemocytometer (El-Sharkawy et al., 2018).
F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fo) was kindly provided by Prof. Yingzi Yun from Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University. Prior to use, the strain was authenticated based on morphological and molecular identification and confirmed for pathogenicity on tomato plants. The isolate was maintained on PDA at 25°C for 7 days, then subcultured into 100 mL PDB and incubated under the same conditions as Th. Conidia were harvested following the same filtration, centrifugation, and washing steps as for T. harzianum. The concentration was adjusted to 1 × 108 conidia mL-¹ (Ouyang et al., 2014).
2.4 Experimental design and cultivation conditions
A full factorial design was employed to investigate the effects of three microbial factors: R. irregularis (Ri), T. harzianum (Th), and F. oxysporum (Fo). Each factor had two levels: presence (+) and absence (−), resulting in 8 treatment combinations. Each treatment included 9 replicates, totaling 72 pots arranged in a randomized complete block design. Blocks were spatially assigned within the greenhouse to minimize environmental variation.
Each pot (15 cm diameter × 12.5 cm height) was filled with 700g of sterilized soil. In +Ri treatments, a 300 g of soil was thoroughly mixed with 50 g of AM inoculum (~2,100 spores) and layered centrally within the pot. For −Ri treatments, an equivalent amount of autoclaved inoculum was used, supplemented with 5 mL of a microbial filtrate (<20 μm) prepared by suspending live AM inoculum in sterile water (1:4 w/w) and filtering through a nylon mesh. This filtrate was added to restore the native non-mycorrhizal microbial community (Hao et al., 2012). The effectiveness of Ri inoculation was validated through trypan blue staining (Biermann and Linderman, 1981). Microscopic analysis revealed that roots from inoculated treatments exhibited a colonization rate exceeding 34%, whereas no mycorrhizal structures were observed in roots from non-inoculated controls.
The inoculation of Th was performed 7 days post-transplantation by applying 40 mL of a conidial suspension (3 × 106 conidia mL-¹) to the soil near the root zone. This staggered inoculation strategy was employed to minimize interference during the early stages of AM fungi colonization, which requires several days for hyphal establishment and arbuscule formation. Delayed inoculation of Trichoderma thus offers a temporal niche separation, potentially enhancing co-beneficial effects (Tanwar et al., 2013). The presence of Th following inoculation was verified by plating root-associated samples on Trichoderma selective medium (TSM), a medium specifically formulated to promote the growth of Trichoderma spp. while inhibiting non-target fungi (Elad and Chet, 1983).
Inoculation with Fo was carried out 4 weeks after transplantation, a stage at which the tomato root system was sufficiently developed to allow consistent pathogen colonization and symptom expression. This timing also ensured that prior microbial inoculants had established effective interactions with the host root system, thereby enabling an accurate assessment of biocontrol effects (Wang et al., 2022). To facilitate infection, tomato roots were gently wounded using a sterile scalpel, and 4 mL of Fo conidial suspension (1 × 108 conidia mL-¹) was applied directly to the injury sites, following the method of Ouyang et al. (2014).
For all −Th and −Fo control treatments, the same procedure was followed using an equal volume of sterile distilled water to ensure consistency in mechanical disturbance and moisture application.
Tomato seeds with uniform germination were selected and sown into pots. Two weeks after planting, seedlings were pruned to leave 2 evenly growing plants per pot. The plants were grown in a greenhouse at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, under natural light conditions. Day and night temperatures were maintained at 28–30°C and 15–17°C, respectively. Soil moisture was kept at approximately 17% (w/w), equivalent to 75% of field capacity, through daily irrigation with deionized water. A phosphorus-free Hoagland nutrient solution was applied weekly throughout the growth period.
2.5 Harvest, biomass measurement, and sample allocation
Plants were harvested 80 days after inoculation with Fo, corresponding to the late infection stage when both R. irregularis colonization and F. oxysporum establishment reached stable levels. This endpoint was selected to capture steady-state physiological and molecular responses to microbial interactions, rather than transient early-stage fluctuations. Photosynthetic parameters of tomato leaves were measured two days before harvest using a portable photosynthesis system (Li-6800, Li-COR Biosciences, USA) on the third fully expanded leaf from the top of each plant. At harvest, both plants in each pot were collected and considered as a single biological replicate. Shoots and roots were separated at the soil surface and processed immediately. The roots were carefully rinsed with deionized water and dried using absorbent paper. The fresh weights (FW) of both shoots and roots were measured individually. Four 0.5 g samples of root tissue were each homogenized in liquid nitrogen, quickly frozen, and stored at −80°C for later use in DNA extraction, RNA isolation, phytohormone analysis, and enzyme activity assays. The remaining shoot and root tissues were first dried in an oven at 105°C for 30 minutes to inactivate enzymes, then further dried at 70°C for 24 hours until a constant weight was achieved. The dry weight (DW) was measured, and the dried material was finely ground using a stainless steel mill.
2.6 qPCR-based quantification of Fusarium oxysporum using the pgx4 gene
Pathogen load in root tissues, quantified by qPCR of the pgx4 gene, was used as a proxy for disease severity (Hirano and Arie, 2006; Zhou et al., 2022; Li et al., 2025). Root DNA from tomato plants was isolated with the FastDNA® SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, USA), following the manufacturer’s guidelines. The pgx4 gene was quantified via quantitative PCR (qPCR) using a Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time PCR System and SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Japan). The primers were sprl-f (5’-GATGGTGGAACGGTATGACC-3’) and sprl-r (5’-CCATCACACAAGAACACAGGA-3’) (Hirano and Arie, 2006). The qPCR protocol began with an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 45 seconds, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds, 64°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 1 minute. A melting curve analysis was performed, starting at 70°C for 10 seconds and gradually increasing to 95°C with a ramp rate of 0.5°C s-¹. A plasmid containing the pgx4 amplicon (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was serially diluted (10-¹–10-7) to generate a standard curve. Gene copy numbers were determined from the standard curve based on the DNA concentration, amplicon length, and the average molecular weight of nucleotide base pairs (660 g mol-¹ bp-¹).
2.7 Elemental analysis
Approximately 0.2 g of dried and finely ground shoot or root tissue was digested with 5 mL of concentrated nitric acid (HNO3, analytical grade) using a microwave digestion system (MARS 5, CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC, USA). Following digestion, the solution was allowed to cool to room temperature and then diluted to a final volume of 50 mL using ultrapure water in acid-cleaned volumetric flasks. Phosphorus (P) concentration in each sample was measured using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES; Prodigy, Teledyne Leeman Labs, Hudson, USA) at a wavelength of 213.617 nm. Calibration was performed using external standards.
2.8 Phytohormone analysis
Concentrations of root phytohormones were measured using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). About 50 mg of root tissue was rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, pulverized into a fine powder, and extracted with 80% methanol supplemented with internal standards. The hormone extracts were filtered and analyzed by LC-ESI-MS/MS using a Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM30A system, connected to an Applied Biosystems 6500 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Chromatographic separation was conducted using a Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.8 μm particle size). The mobile phase consisted of (A) 0.04% acetic acid in water and (B) 0.04% acetic acid in acetonitrile. The gradient program was as follows: 5% B for 0–1 min, increased linearly to 95% B from 1–8 min, maintained at 95% B for 1 min, then returned to 5% B over 0.1 min and held for re-equilibration until 12 min. Flow rate was 0.35 mL min-¹, column temperature was maintained at 40°C, and injection volume was 2 μL. Electrospray ionization (ESI) was performed using both positive and negative ion modes. Source temperature was set to 550°C; ion spray voltage was +5.5 kV in positive mode and −4.5 kV in negative mode; curtain gas pressure was maintained at 35 psi. Hormone concentrations were quantified using an internal standard method with calibration curves generated from authentic reference standards.
2.9 Gene expression analysis
Total RNA was isolated from tomato roots with the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). First-strand cDNA was synthesized from RNA using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted with gene-specific primers on a Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, USA). Reactions were carried out in 20 μL of SYBR Green Master Mix (Takara, Japan) with 0.2 μM of each primer and 2 μL of cDNA template. The genes analyzed included Lipoxygenase D (LOXD, U37840; primers: 5’-ACTCATCAGCACCGACATCG-3’ and 5’-ACTCTCCAGAAAGAACTCCTGC-3’), Allene Oxide Cyclase (AOC, AW624058; primers: 5’-CTCGGAGATCTTGTCCCCTTT-3’ and 5’-CTCCTTTCTTCTCTTCTTCGTGCT-3’), PAL (AW035278 primers: 5’-ACGGGTTGCCATCTAATCTGACA-3’ and 5’-CGAGCAATAAGAAGCCATCGCAAT-3), and Chitinase (CHI, Z15140; primers: 5’-AACTATGGGCCATGTGGAAGA-3’ and 5’-GGCTTTGGGGATTGAGGAG-3’), with Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme 3 (UBI3, X58253; primers: 5’-TCCATCTCGTGCTCCGTCT-3’ and 5’-GAACCTTTCCAGTGTCATCAACC-3’) serving as the internal reference (Song et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2022). Gene expression levels were determined by the 2−ΔΔCt method (Pfaffl, 2001), normalizing cycle threshold (Ct) values to UBI3 expression.
2.10 Enzyme activity assays
PAL and PPO activities in tomato roots were determined using kits from Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Beijing, China, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Root tissues were blended in extraction buffer and subjected to centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 10 min. The supernatants were used for enzymatic assays. PAL activity was measured based on the conversion of L-phenylalanine to trans-cinnamic acid, recorded at 290 nm, while PPO activity was determined by measuring the increase in absorbance at 410 nm due to quinone formation. Enzyme activities were expressed as units per gram fresh weight (U g-¹ FW).
2.11 Statistical analysis
Data were examined for normality (Shapiro–Wilk) and homogeneity of variance (Levene), both at a significance level of α = 0.05. To test treatment effects of R. irregularis (Myc), T. harzianum (Tri), and F. oxysporum (Fus) inoculations, a three-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to examine both main and interaction effects. For pairwise comparisons, a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test (p < 0.05) was applied. Spearman correlation analysis and significance testing were conducted to assess the relationships among the relative abundance of Fo, concentrations of SA, salicylic acid glucoside (SAG), 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA), 4-oxo-2-(pentenyl)cyclopentane-1-butanoic acid (OPC-4), JA, jasmonoyl-isoleucine (JA-Ile), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), hydroxylated jasmonic acid (H2JA), and jasmonoyl-valine (JA-Val); the expression levels of defense-related genes (PAL, LOX, AOC, and CHI); and the activities of PAL and PPO enzymes in tomato roots. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA), while graphical representations were generated using OriginPro 2021 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, USA).
3 Results
3.1 Pathogen abundance, photosynthesis, plant growth, and phosphorus acquisition
qPCR targeting the pgx4 gene confirmed successful colonization of Fo in tomato roots. Plants inoculated with Fo showed significantly higher pgx4 copy numbers than non-inoculated controls (p < 0.001), indicating substantial pathogen accumulation in the root system (Figure 1A; Table 1). In contrast, inoculation with Ri, Th, or their combination significantly suppressed Fo colonization and proliferation in the root tissues (p < 0.05). However, the inhibitory effects of Ri and Th were comparable, and co-inoculation did not yield synergistic suppression of Fo abundance.
Figure 1. Pathogen abundance (A), net photosynthetic rate (B), shoot dry weight (C), root dry weight (D), shoot phosphorus (P) concentration (E), and root P concentration (F) of tomato plants inoculated with/without Rhizophagus irregularis (Ri), Trichoderma harzianum (Th) and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fo). The labels -Ri and +Ri represent non-inoculated control and inoculation with Ri, respectively. -Th and +Th represent non-inoculated control and inoculation with Th, respectively. -Fo and +Fo represent non-inoculated control and inoculation with Fo, respectively. The error bars represent the standard error (SE). Columns with the same lowercase letters indicate no significant difference at p<0.05.
Table 1. P-values from three-way ANOVA showing the effects of experimental factors (Rhizophagus irregularis, Myc; Trichoderma harzianum, Tri; and Fusarium oxysporum, Fus) on a series of dependent variables, including pathogen abundance; net photosynthetic rate (Pn); shoot and root dry weight; shoot and root phosphorus (P) concentrations; phytohormone levels of salicylic acid (SA), salicylic acid 2-O-β-glucoside (SAG), 3-oxo-2-(2-(Z)-pentenyl) cyclopentane-1-butyric acid (OPC-4), 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA), jasmonic acid (JA), jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine (JA-Ile), jasmonoyl-valine (JA-Val), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), and dihydrojasmonic acid (H2JA); expression levels of lipoxygenase D (LOXD), allene oxide cyclase (AOC), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), and chitinase (CHI); and the enzymatic activities of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO).
The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) was significantly influenced by Ri, Th, and Fo inoculation, with a notable three-way interaction among these factors (Myc: F(1, 24) = 30.48, p < 0.001; Tri: F(1, 24) = 26.71, p < 0.001; Fus: F(1, 24) = 32.84, p < 0.001; Figure 1B; Table 1). Under Fo-free conditions, Ri inoculation increased Pn by 31.1% relative to the control, while co-inoculation with Th (Ri + Th) further enhanced Pn by 67.9%.
Microbial treatments did not significantly affect shoot dry weight (Figure 1C; Table 1). Ri inoculation significantly promoted root dry weight by 15.6% in the absence of pathogen (p < 0.05), indicating a classical mycorrhizal growth response (Figure 1D; Table 1). However, this effect was significantly suppressed under Fo challenge, with a 16.1% reduction in Ri-induced root dry weight, as shown by a significant Myc × Fus interaction (F(1, 64) = 10.60, p < 0.01).
Ri enhanced plant P acquisition, increasing shoot and root P concentrations by 16.6% and 32.5%, respectively, compared with uninoculated controls (p < 0.001; Figures 1E, F; Table 1). In the presence of Fo, the Ri-driven increase in root P was reduced by 21.6%, with a significant Myc × Fus interaction detected (p < 0.001). Th inoculation had no significant effect on phosphorus acquisition.
3.2 Phytohormone profiling
SA accumulation was significantly modulated by Th and Fo treatments, with significant interactions detected between Myc × Fus and Tri × Fus (F(1, 15) = 10.35, p < 0.01; F(1, 15) = 5.40, p < 0.05; Figure 2A; Table 1). Notably, co-inoculation with Ri and Th followed by Fo challenge resulted in a 140.3% increase in SA concentration compared with the non-inoculated control. However, SAG did not differ among treatments (Figure 2B; Table 1).
Figure 2. Salicylic acid (SA) (A) and salicylic acid 2-O-β-glucoside (SAG) (B) concentrations in tomato roots inoculated with/without Rhizophagus irregularis (Ri), Trichoderma harzianum (Th), and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fo). The labels -Ri and +Ri represent non-inoculated control and inoculation with Ri, respectively. -Th and +Th represent non-inoculated control and inoculation with Th, respectively. -Fo and +Fo represent non-inoculated control and inoculation with Fo, respectively. The error bars represent the standard error (SE). Columns with the same lowercase letters indicate no significant difference at p<0.05.
Fo infection had no significant effect on OPC-4 levels (p = 0.072; Figure 3A; Table 1). However, this value was markedly lower in plants co-inoculated with Ri or Th, each showing significant interaction with Fo (Myc × Fus: F(1, 16) = 4.94, p < 0.05). Th inoculation alone had no significant effect on OPC-4 levels compared to the control. The lowest OPC-4 accumulation was observed under Ri+Fo treatment.
Figure 3. Concentrations of 3-oxo-2-(2-(Z)-pentenyl) cyclopentane-1-butyric acid (OPC-4) (A), 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA) (B), jasmonic acid (JA) (C), jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine (JA-Ile) (D), jasmonoyl-valine (JA-Val) (E), methyl jasmonate (MeJA) (F), and dihydrojasmonic acid (H2JA) (G), concentrations in tomato roots inoculated with/without Rhizophagus irregularis (Ri), Trichoderma harzianum (Th) and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fo). The labels -Ri and +Ri represent non-inoculated control and inoculation with Ri, respectively. -Th and +Th represent non-inoculated control and inoculation with Th, respectively. -Fo and +Fo represent non-inoculated control and inoculation with Fo, respectively. The error bars represent the standard error (SE). Columns with the same lowercase letters indicate no significant difference at p<0.05.
Fo infection significantly increased OPDA accumulation, indicating activation of the oxylipin-mediated jasmonate biosynthesis pathway (Figure 3B; Table 1). Both Ri and Th inoculation independently reduced this pathogen-induced OPDA surge, with Th exerting the strongest suppressive effect. Co-inoculation of Ri and Th further attenuated OPDA levels.
JA concentrations were not significantly affected by Fo inoculation (p = 0.127; Figure 3C; Table 1). Notably, Ri colonization alone did not alter JA levels, but significantly attenuated Fo-induced JA increases, as evidenced by a significant Myc × Fus interaction (F(1, 16) = 10.51, p < 0.01). The lowest JA concentrations were observed in plants co-inoculated with Ri, Th, and Fo.
JA-Ile was significantly induced by Fo infection (p < 0.05; Figure 3D; Table 1). However, this accumulation was attenuated in the presence of Ri, with significant Myc × Fus interactions (F(1, 16) = 18.90, p < 0.001). Th inoculation alone significantly suppressed JA-Ile levels, while Ri alone had no effect. Notably, Ri inoculation under pathogen stress resulted in the lowest JA-Ile concentrations among all treatments.
JA-Val accumulation was significantly suppressed by Th (p < 0.05; Figure 3E; Table 1), and a significant interaction between Th and Ri was observed. While Ri inoculation alone had no effect, its combination with Fo resulted in the lowest JA-Val content.
Ri inoculation significantly suppressed MeJA accumulation regardless of pathogen presence, and a strong Myc × Fus interaction was observed (F(1, 16) = 24.77, p < 0.001; Figure 3F; Table 1). Under Ri colonization, MeJA was below the limit of detection (LOD, 0.2 ng g-¹ FW) in Fo-challenged plants. Th inoculation also mitigated Fo-induced MeJA accumulation.
H2JA did not significantly increase in response to Fo infection alone (Figure 3G, Table 1). Ri significantly suppressed H2JA accumulation (p < 0.01), and a strong interaction with Fo was observed. Th inoculation showed no effect on H2JA levels alone but, when combined with Ri and/or Fo, further reduced H2JA content. The lowest H2JA levels were detected under the inoculation of Ri and Th.
3.3 Gene expression and enzyme activity
The expression of LOXD, an upstream lipoxygenase involved in JA biosynthesis, was significantly downregulated by Ri inoculation (p < 0.05; Figure 4A; Table 1). In contrast, AOC showed no significant changes across treatments (Figure 4B; Table 1).
Figure 4. Gene expression of genes lipooxygenase (LOXD) (A), ainocinnamate oxotransferase (AOC) (B), phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) (C) and chitinase (CHI) (D) in tomato root inoculated with/without Rhizophagus irregularis (Ri), Trichoderma harzianum (Th), and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fo). The labels -Ri and +Ri represent non-inoculated control and inoculation with Ri, respectively. -Th and +Th represent non-inoculated control and inoculation with Th, respectively. -Fo and +Fo represent non-inoculated control and inoculation with Fo, respectively. The error bars represent the standard error (SE). Columns with the same lowercase letters indicate no significant difference at p<0.05.
Inoculation with Fo significantly upregulated the expression of PAL (p < 0.05; Figure 4C; Table 1). Co-inoculation with Ri and Fo further enhanced PAL expression by 128.3% compared with Ri alone, indicating a stronger induction under pathogen challenge. In contrast, CHI was significantly suppressed by Ri inoculation (p < 0.05; Figure 4D; Table 1). A significant Ri × Fo interaction was observed (F(1, 23) = 6.50, p < 0.05), where Fo infection restored CHI expression in Ri-colonized plants, resulting in a 2.5-fold increase compared with the Ri-alone.
Fo inoculation significantly increased the activities of both PAL and PPO (p < 0.01; Figures 5A, B; Table 1). Ri or Th alone did not alter PAL activity compared with controls. Combining Ri or Th with Fo (Ri + Fo or Th + Fo) partially attenuated Fo-induced PAL activation, and the triple treatment (Ri + Th + Fo) showed the lowest PAL activity among Fo-challenged groups (Figure 5A). Neither Ri nor Th alone significantly altered PPO activity (Figure 5B; Table 1). Co-inoculation with Ri or Th attenuated the pathogen-induced increase in PPO activity, and the triple treatment (Ri + Th + Fo) exhibited significantly lower PPO activity compared with Fo alone (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. The enzyme activities of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) (A) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) (B) in tomato root inoculated with/without Rhizophagus irregularis (Ri), Trichoderma harzianum (Th), and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fo). The labels -Ri and +Ri represent non-inoculated control and inoculation with Ri, respectively. -Th and +Th represent non-inoculated control and inoculation with Th, respectively. -Fo and +Fo represent non-inoculated control and inoculation with Fo, respectively. The error bars represent the standard error (SE). Columns with the same lowercase letters indicate no significant difference at p<0.05.
3.4 Correlations between F. oxysporum abundance and root immune parameters
In plants inoculated with Fo alone (Figure 6A), the relative abundance of Fo showed strong positive correlations (p < 0.05) with OPDA (r = 0.88), JA-Ile (r = 0.85), and PPO activity (r = 0.94).
Figure 6. Correlation between the relative abundance of Fusarium oxysporum, phytohormone concentrations, gene expression, and enzyme activities in tomato roots inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum (Fo), with or without Rhizophagus irregularis (Ri) and/or Trichoderma harzianum (Th). Panels (A) show data for plants inoculated with Fo alone, without Ri and Th; (B) show data for plants inoculated with Fo and Ri; (C) show data for plants inoculated with Fo and Th; (D) show data for plants inoculated with Fo, Ri, and Th. An asterisk (“*”) indicates significant differences between two factors (p<0.05) based on the Spearman test. Pairwise comparisons of factors are represented with a color gradient denoting the Spearman correlation coefficient, where a value of 1 represents a perfect positive correlation (shown in brown), and -1 represents a perfect negative correlation (shown in green). Fo represents the relative abundance of Fusarium oxysporum, while SA (salicylic acid), SAG (salicylic acid 2-O-β-glucoside), OPDA (12-oxo-phytodienoic acid), OPC-4 (3-oxo-2-(2-(Z)-pentenyl) cyclopentane-1-butyric acid), JA (jasmonic acid), JA-Ile (jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine), MeJA (methyl jasmonate), H2JA (dihydrojasmonic acid), and JA-Val (jasmonoyl-valine) refer to phytohormone concentrations. PAL_G (phenylalanine ammonia lyase), LOXD (lipooxygenase), AOC (aminocinnamate oxotransferase), and CHI (chitinase) represent the relative expression levels of PAL, LOXD, AOC, and CHI genes. PAL_E and PPO represent the enzyme activities of PAL and PPO.
In the presence of Ri alone, the correlation between Fo abundance and immune parameters shifted (Figure 6B). Fo abundance was positively correlated with PAL activity (r = 0.91, p < 0.05) but negatively with MeJA (r = -0.86, p < 0.05). A negative correlation was observed between SA and several JA-related compounds (p < 0.05), including OPC-4 (r = −0.87), JA (r = −0.84), JA-Ile (r = −0.85), MeJA (r = −0.84), H2JA (r = −0.86), and JA-Val (r = −0.86).
In the Th monoinoculation treatment, no significant correlations were detected between Fo abundance and hormone concentrations (Figure 6C).
In the co-inoculation treatment with Ri and Th (Figure 6D), Fo abundance exhibited a significant positive correlation with SA concentration (r = 0.99, p < 0.05), PAL activity (r = 0.85, p < 0.05), and PPO activity (r = 0.90, p < 0.05), while showing a significant negative correlation with JA (r = −0.83, p < 0.05) and MeJA (r = −0.94, p < 0.05) concentrations. SA concentration was positively correlated with both PAL (r = 0.87, p < 0.05) and PPO activities (r = 0.93, p < 0.05), while negatively correlated with JA (r = −0.89, p < 0.05) and MeJA (r = −0.98, p < 0.05).
4 Discussion
This study explores the complex interactions between the beneficial microbes AM fungi, Trichoderma, and the fungal pathogen in tomato plants. Across treatments, Ri and Th each reduced Fo abundance in roots and were associated with a shift from a jasmonate-biased profile under Fo alone to a salicylic acid-dominant state, as indicated by higher SA and PAL expression/activity together with attenuated JA-pathway readouts (OPDA, JA, JA-Ile, MeJA). Under co-inoculation, Fo suppression and SA-linked outputs were not greater than under single inoculants, supporting non-additive effects rather than functional incompatibility under our conditions (Figure 7).
Figure 7. Schematic summary of salicylic acid (SA)- and jasmonic acid (JA)-mediated immune responses in tomato roots infected by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fo), and their modulation by Rhizophagus irregularis (Ri) and Trichoderma harzianum (Th). (A) Plants without Ri or Th inoculation: Fo infection predominantly activated the JA signaling pathway (red thick arrows) and induced oxidative defenses through phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO). (B) Ri-inoculated plants: SA signaling was strongly enhanced, whereas JA signaling was suppressed (blue thick arrows), reflecting the antagonistic interaction between the two pathways under pathogen stress. (C) Th-inoculated plants: JA signaling was likewise suppressed, accompanied by a moderate promotion of SA signaling. (D) Ri + Th co-inoculated plants: both enhanced SA signaling and suppressed JA signaling were observed, but no synergistic effect compared with single inoculations was detected. CA, chorismic acid; IC, isochorismic acid; Phe, phenylalanine; t-CA, trans-cinnamic acid; SA, salicylic acid; SAG, salicylic acid 2-O-β-glucoside; α-LeA, α-linolenic acid; OPDA, 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid; JA, jasmonic acid; MeJA, methyl jasmonate; JA-Ile, jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine; 13-HOPT, 13(S)-hydroperoxy-octadecatrienoic acid; JA-Val, jasmonoyl-valine; H2JA, dihydrojasmonic acid; LOX, lipoxygenase; AOC, allene oxide cyclase; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; PPO, polyphenol oxidase.
4.1 Beneficial microbes mitigate Fusarium wilt via distinct mechanisms
The suppression of Fo colonization by beneficial microbes represents an effective and ecologically sustainable strategy for managing tomato wilt disease (Martinez-Medina et al., 2009). In this study, both Ri and Th significantly reduced Fo colonization in tomato roots (Figure 1A; Table 1). Importantly, the magnitude of suppression was comparable between the two inoculants, and co-inoculation did not lead to synergistic effects beyond single inoculations. These findings highlight non-additive rather than antagonistic outcomes under our conditions, underscoring the need to dissect the distinct but partially overlapping contributions of AM fungi and Trichoderma when applied together. Such mechanistic understanding is essential for the rational design of microbial consortia in integrated disease management programs.
Ri is well recognized for improving plant nutrient acquisition, particularly P, which is fundamental for plant vigor, growth, and resilience to stress (Wang et al., 2022). In our experiment, Ri inoculation markedly increased P concentrations in both shoots and roots (Figures 1E, F; Table 1) and enhanced photosynthetic performance in the absence of Fo (Figure 1B; Table 1). For instance, Pn increased by 31.1% under Ri alone, while Ri+Th co-inoculation further elevated Pn by 67.9% compared with the control. This additive benefit under pathogen-free conditions is consistent with earlier studies in crops such as cantaloupe and chickpea, where AM fungi reduced Fusarium wilt incidence by improving nutrient uptake and host metabolism (Singh et al., 2010). Enhanced P availability likely strengthens multiple physiological processes—including ATP synthesis, nucleic acid metabolism, and membrane integrity—that indirectly reinforce the plant’s capacity to withstand pathogen invasion (Dissanayaka et al., 2021). It is therefore plausible that Ri indirectly enhances systemic resistance by sustaining plant metabolic homeostasis and energy supply during pathogen challenge.
In contrast, Th is primarily associated with direct antagonism against soil-borne pathogens (Mukherjee et al., 2022). As a fast-growing, non-pathogenic filamentous fungus, Th rapidly colonizes the rhizosphere and root surfaces, where it suppresses pathogen proliferation through multiple mechanisms, including nutrient and space competition, hyphal parasitism, and secretion of antifungal metabolites such as peptaibols, polyketides, and volatile organic compounds (Benítez et al., 2004; Mukherjee et al., 2022). In our study, Th inoculation consistently reduced Fo colonization in tomato roots (Figure 1A), in line with its well-documented antagonistic properties. Previous dual-culture assays have further confirmed that Th interferes with Fo hyphal growth via mechanical penetration, coiling, and spatial exclusion (Bunbury-Blanchette and Walker, 2019; Ghanbarzadeh et al., 2014). Such evidence suggests that the reductions observed in planta can be at least partly attributed to these antagonistic mechanisms, which likely operate alongside microbe-induced changes in the rhizosphere environment.
Although Ri and Th rely on different primary routes—Ri through nutritional enhancement and Th through direct antagonism—their functional outcomes partly converge, resulting in similar reductions of Fo colonization. The absence of synergy under co-inoculation suggests that their contributions are not additive. Non-additive effects are frequently observed in AM fungi and Trichoderma studies. For example, co-inoculation of AM fungi and Trichoderma did not result in synergistic gains in controlling Fusarium wilt in banana (Castillo et al., 2019) nor in promoting onion growth (Metwally and Al-Amri, 2020). Several explanations may account for this non-additivity. First, both microbes may ultimately influence overlapping physiological processes in the host, thereby reaching a functional ceiling in terms of pathogen suppression (Martinez-Medina et al., 2016). Second, resource and niche competition between Ri and Th in the rhizosphere could constrain their combined efficacy, limiting colonization density or activity of one partner in the presence of the other (De Jaeger et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2021; Thakur et al., 2019). Third, the timing of colonization may be critical: AM fungi typically require several weeks to establish intraradical structures such as arbuscules (Shi et al., 2025; Sugiura et al., 2020), whereas Trichoderma colonizes root surfaces within days (Benítez et al., 2004). This temporal complementarity may allow Th to confer rapid, short-term protection, while Ri gradually builds longer-term benefits through improved host nutrition. However, when both are applied simultaneously, their overlapping downstream impacts may not translate into additive disease suppression (Martinez-Medina et al., 2011) From an applied perspective, these findings underscore the complexity of combining beneficial microbes in crop protection strategies. While both Ri and Th individually suppressed Fo, their co-inoculation did not produce additional benefits in terms of pathogen control under our experimental conditions. This suggests that designing effective consortia requires not only selecting complementary partners but also considering inoculation sequence, colonization dynamics, and the specific environmental context.
4.2 Hormonal signaling trade-offs underlie immune response modulation
A central outcome of this study is that inoculation with Ri or Th reshaped tomato immune responses to Fo through shifts in SA) and JA signaling. SA and JA are well established as antagonistic regulators of plant immunity (Hou and Tsuda, 2022; Pieterse et al., 2009). Our data show that Fo infection in the absence of beneficial microbes activated a canonical JA-biased response, whereas Ri or Th inoculation shifted immunity towards an SA-dominant state (Figures 2–6). This indicates that beneficial microbes do not simply enhance basal resistance but actively reconfigure hormonal priorities in the host (Pieterse et al., 2009).
In pathogen-only treatments, Fo infection strongly induced JA biosynthesis and its downstream derivatives, including OPDA, JA-Ile, and MeJA (Figures 3–5). This pattern aligns with the known association of JA signaling with defenses against necrotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens (Fujikawa et al., 2021; Lorenzo and Solano, 2005). Moreover, the observed positive correlations between Fo abundance and the levels of both JA-Ile and PPO activity (Figure 6A) are consistent with the established model that tomato plants activate JA-mediated defense pathways in response to pathogen challenge (Fernandes and Ghag, 2022).
In contrast, Ri colonization redirected the immune profile towards SA. Specifically, Ri suppressed LOXD expression, reduced OPDA and JA levels, and simultaneously elevated SA content and PAL expression/activity (Figures 2A, 3, 4A, 5A). Strong negative correlations between SA and multiple JA derivatives (Figure 6B) reinforce the notion of SA–JA antagonism. These observations are consistent with previous reports that AM fungi can prime SA-related pathways while dampening JA signaling (Cameron et al., 2013; Hao et al., 2012). Functionally, this shift may favor resistance to the early biotrophic phase of Fo infection, when host tissue remains alive. Our results, demonstrating that Ri inoculation elevates tissue P levels and primes SA-mediated pathways, align with the broader framework proposed by Liu et al. (2024), which suggests that AM fungi modulate biotrophic pathogen defense through a balance between nutritional and defense-induced mechanisms.
Th inoculation produced a remarkably similar hormonal pattern. In Fo-challenged plants, Th reduced JA and JA-Ile accumulation while elevating SA and PAL activity (Figures 2–5). This is notable because Trichoderma spp. are often linked to JA/ET-dependent ISR, yet our findings and others (Harman et al., 2004) demonstrate that they can also trigger SAR-like responses mediated by SA. Such flexibility may explain their broad-spectrum biocontrol efficacy, integrating direct antagonism in the rhizosphere with systemic immune priming in the host (Alkooranee et al., 2017).
Under dual inoculation with Ri and Th, JA suppression and SA elevation were again observed, but no additive effects beyond single inoculants were detected. This plateau suggests that SA responses may reach a functional ceiling, where further enhancement is constrained by homeostatic feedbacks or growth–defense trade-offs (Li et al., 2019). Thus, the lack of synergy at the hormonal level mirrors the non-additive pathogen suppression observed at the whole-plant scale (Martinez-Medina et al., 2016).
The ecological significance of this SA–JA trade-off becomes apparent when considering the life cycle of Fo (Benjamin et al., 2022). As a hemibiotrophic pathogen, Fo begins with a biotrophic phase followed by a necrotrophic stage (Di Pietro et al., 2003). SA signaling is generally more effective against biotrophs, whereas JA defenses are essential against necrotrophs and herbivores (Grant and Lamb, 2006; Pieterse et al., 2009). By shifting tomato immunity towards SA dominance, Ri and Th may restrict Fo colonization during the biotrophic phase, thereby limiting progression to necrotrophy and effectively “buying time” for the host (Boamah et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2013).
The link between hormones and defense enzymes further supports this interpretation. Both PAL and PPO activities increased in Ri- or Th-treated roots (Figures 5A, B). These enzymes reinforce cell walls through lignin deposition, accumulate phenolic compounds, and contribute to oxidative defense, thereby creating multiple barriers to pathogen invasion (Kampatsikas et al., 2019). Positive correlations between SA, PAL/PPO activity, and reduced Fo abundance (Figures 6B–D) suggest that these enzymatic defenses are functionally associated with the SA-biased immune state observed in treatments involving beneficial microbes.
Taken together, these findings emphasize that Ri and Th do not simply mitigate Fusarium wilt by reducing pathogen load but also reshape host hormonal networks. By attenuating JA signaling and reinforcing SA-dependent pathways, they help the plant reorient its immune responses in a way that is particularly effective against the early stages of hemibiotrophic infection. This microbe-driven hormonal reprogramming highlights the capacity of beneficial root symbionts to fine-tune host immunity, offering insights into both the ecological significance of symbiotic interactions and the practical potential of microbial inoculants for sustainable disease management.
4.3 Limitations and prospects for application
4.3.1 Nutritional and immune pathways underlying disease resistance
Our findings indicate that Ri and Th alleviate Fo infection by enhancing phosphorus uptake and shifting tomato immunity toward a SA-dominated profile, leading to non-additive outcomes under co-inoculation. Both phosphorus acquisition and SA-mediated defense are key determinants of plant resistance to biotrophic pathogens (Liu et al., 2024). However, the relative contributions of nutritional and immune factors to disease suppression remain unclear.
Future studies should aim to disentangle these effects by incorporating phosphorus-matched controls, phosphorus availability gradients, and multi-timepoint sampling following pathogen challenge. These experiments will help determine whether enhanced resistance arises primarily from improved phosphorus nutrition, immune reprogramming, or their interaction, thereby elucidating nutrient–immunity crosstalk in the biocontrol process.
4.3.2 Mechanistic basis of non-additive biocontrol effects
The lack of additive biocontrol effects observed under co-inoculation may result from several potential mechanisms, including niche competition between Ri and Th, partial overlap in signaling pathways regulating the SA–JA balance, or functional saturation of host defense responses (Pieterse et al., 2009). Although quantitative analysis of inoculant abundance was not performed in this study, morphological observations and successful re-isolation of both microorganisms confirmed their effective establishment in the rhizosphere. It should be noted that the present study focused on the endpoint responses of tomato plants to inoculation with Ri and Th. This design allowed for assessing the steady-state immune and hormonal adjustments occurring at the late infection stage. Nevertheless, future time-course experiments including early and intermediate stages would be highly valuable to elucidate the temporal dynamics of SA–JA pathway activation and disease suppression mechanisms.
While the present work verified the colonization of both Ri and Th, their spatial organization within root tissues was not visualized. Applying confocal microscopy coupled with fluorescent staining or in situ hybridization will allow high-resolution observation of colonization patterns, enabling differentiation between overlapping and spatially distinct infection sites. Understanding these spatial relationships could yield crucial insight into how AM fungi and Trichoderma interact functionally within the root microenvironment (Gordon, 2017). Future studies should also employ 3D root imaging or dual fluorescent labeling to clarify whether the observed non-additive effects are associated with niche sharing or spatial partitioning between Ri and Th.
4.3.3 Biochemical and metabolite-level mechanisms
Although this study quantified F. oxysporum colonization using pgx4-based qPCR, which provides a reliable measure of pathogen abundance within tomato roots, this approach does not directly capture the biochemical dynamics underlying disease suppression. It is likely that part of the inhibitory effect observed under Ri and Th inoculations involves the modulation of pathogen-derived fusaric acid and the secretion of antifungal or signaling metabolites by the beneficial microbes.
Previous studies have demonstrated that T. harzianum produces peptaibols, polyketides, and volatile organic compounds capable of detoxifying fusaric acid and restricting Fusarium proliferation (Vinale et al., 2008). Moreover, AM fungi colonization can alter root exudate composition, potentially influencing rhizosphere metabolite exchange and microbial communication (Trivedi et al., 2020). Therefore, integrating targeted metabolomics with fusaric acid quantification will be valuable for elucidating how biochemical interactions among F. oxysporum, R. irregularis, and T. harzianum contribute to the non-additive and hormone-associated biocontrol mechanisms revealed in this study.
The pgx4-based quantification used in this study provides an accurate molecular proxy for pathogen load but does not directly indicate the spatial colonization or viability of F. oxysporum within roots. Therefore, our interpretation of reduced pathogen abundance primarily reflects changes in total fungal DNA rather than direct visualization of infection sites. Future studies combining fluorescent labeling, confocal microscopy, or histochemical staining will be valuable to confirm whether the reduced pgx4 signal corresponds to decreased viable colonization and to elucidate how AM fungi and Trichoderma influence the spatial distribution of Fusarium within the root cortex and vasculature.
4.3.4 Field validation and microbiome-based evaluation
Because the present study was conducted under controlled greenhouse conditions, the effects of soil physicochemical properties, management practices, and indigenous microbial communities remain unexplored. To translate these findings into agricultural practice, field trials should be conducted across diverse soil types and cropping systems (Martinez-Medina et al., 2016). In these trials, incorporating microbiome profiling techniques such as amplicon sequencing and metagenomic analysis will allow assessment of inoculation efficacy, community-level impacts, and the stability of disease suppression achieved by AM fungi–Trichoderma consortia. Such integrated analyses will provide ecological evidence for developing robust and sustainable biocontrol applications against Fusarium wilt.
5 Conclusion
This study demonstrates that both AM fungi and Trichoderma mitigate F. oxysporum infection in tomato through distinct mechanisms coupled with immune modulation. Ri or Th shifted root signaling from the JA-biased state observed under Fo alone toward an SA-biased profile, accompanied by PAL activation and attenuation of JA-pathway readouts. Co-inoculation did not enhance pathogen suppression or SA-linked outputs beyond single inoculants, indicating non-additive effect. To advance application, we recommend time-resolved and P-matched experiments to disentangle nutritional and signaling contributions, quantitative assessment of both inoculant loads and spatial niches, and factorial tests of inoculation order and formulation parameters. Field validation across soil types and management systems is essential to assess robustness within native microbiomes. Finally, integrative omics together with targeted marker assays will help resolve the circuitry of microbe-induced immune modulation and guide the rational design of microbial consortia for sustainable management of Fusarium wilt.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
KZ: Investigation, Writing – original draft. HW: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. WX: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. TN: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. WF: Data curation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. XZ: Resources, Validation, Writing – review & editing. ZH: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. BC: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This project was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFF1304101 and 2022YFE0114000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21A2024, 42077039, 42207347 and 42177277).
Acknowledgments
We thank Yingzi Yun from Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University for kindly supplying the Fusarium oxysporum strain.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. To support the writing and editing process of this manuscript, specifically to refine clarity, grammar, and overall flow, and to improve the readability and conciseness of the scientific language.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Ahammed, G. J., Mao, Q., Yan, Y., Wu, M., Wang, Y., Ren, J., et al. (2020). Role of melatonin in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-induced resistance to Fusarium wilt in cucumber. Phytopathology 110, 999–1009. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-11-19-0435-R
Alkooranee, J. T., Aledan, T. R., Ali, A. K., Lu, G., Zhang, X., Wu, J., et al. (2017). Detecting the hormonal pathways in oilseed rape behind induced systemic resistance by Trichoderma harzianum TH12 to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. PloS One 12, e0168850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168850
Benítez, T., Rincón, A. M., Limón, M. C., and Codón, A. C. (2004). Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. Int. Microbiol. 7, 249–260.
Benjamin, G., Pandharikar, G., and Frendo, P. (2022). Salicylic acid in plant symbioses: beyond plant pathogen interactions. Biology 11, 861. doi: 10.3390/biology11060861
Biermann, B. and Linderman, R. (1981). Quantifying vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae: a proposed method towards standardization. New Phytol. 87, 63–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1981.tb01690.x
Boamah, S., Ojangba, T., Zhang, S., Zhu, N., Osei, R., Tiika, R. J., et al. (2023). Evaluation of salicylic acid (SA) signaling pathways and molecular markers in Trichoderma-treated plants under salinity and Fusarium stresses. A review. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 166, 259–274. doi: 10.1007/s10658-023-02660-9
Buddenhagen, I. (2009). Understanding strain diversity in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp cubense and history of introduction of ‘Tropical Race 4’ to better manage banana production. Acta Hortic. 828, 193–204. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.828.19
Bunbury-Blanchette, A. L. and Walker, A. K. (2019). Trichoderma species show biocontrol potential in dual culture and greenhouse bioassays against Fusarium basal rot of onion. Biol. Control 130, 127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.11.007
Cameron, D. D., Neal, A. L., van Wees, S. C. M., and Ton, J. (2013). Mycorrhiza-induced resistance: more than the sum of its parts? Trends Plant Sci. 18, 539–545. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.06.004
Castillo, A. G., Puig, C. G., and Cumagun, C. J. R. (2019). Non-synergistic effect of Trichoderma harzianum and Glomus spp. in reducing infection of Fusarium wilt in banana. Pathogens 8, 43. doi: 10.3390/pathogens8020043
Chohan, S. A., Akbar, M., and Iqbal, U. (2024). Trichoderma based formulations control the wilt disease of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris, better when inoculated as consortia: findings from pot experiments under field conditions. PeerJ 12, e17835. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17835
De Jaeger, N., de la Providencia, I. E., de Boulois, H. D., and Declerck, S. (2011). Trichoderma harzianum might impact phosphorus transport by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 77, 558–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01135.x
Deng, Y. and He, Z. (2024). The seesaw action: balancing plant immunity and growth. Sci. Bull. 69, 3–6. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2023.11.051
Di Pietro, A., Madrid, M. P., Caracuel, Z., Delgado-Jarana, J., and Roncero, M. I. G. (2003). Fusarium oxysporum: exploring the molecular arsenal of a vascular wilt fungus. Mol. Plant Pathol. 4, 315–325. doi: 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00180.x
Dissanayaka, D. M. S. B., Ghahremani, M., Siebers, M., Wasaki, J., and Plaxton, W. C. (2021). Recent insights into the metabolic adaptations of phosphorus-deprived plants. J. Exp. Bot. 72, 199–223. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa482
Dutta, P., Mahanta, M., Singh, S. B., Thakuria, D., Deb, L., Kumari, A., et al. (2023). Molecular interaction between plants and Trichoderma species against soil-borne plant pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 14. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1145715
Eke, P., Nana Wakam, L., Tsouh Fokou, P. V., Virginie Ekounda, T., Sahu, K. P., Kamdem Wankeu, T. H., et al. (2019). Improved nutrient status and Fusarium root rot mitigation with an inoculant of two biocontrol fungi in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Rhizosphere 12, 100172. doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2019.100172
Elad, Y. and Chet, I. (1983). Improved selective media for isolation of Trichoderma spp. or Fusarium spp. Phytoparasitica 11, 55–58. doi: 10.1007/BF02980712
El-Sharkawy, H. H. A., Rashad, Y. M., and Ibrahim, S. A. (2018). Biocontrol of stem rust disease of wheat using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma spp. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 103, 84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2018.05.002
Fernandes, L. B. and Ghag, S. B. (2022). Molecular insights into the jasmonate signaling and associated defense responses against wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 174, 22–34. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.01.032
Fujikawa, I., Takehara, Y., Ota, M., Imada, K., Sasaki, K., Kajihara, H., et al. (2021). Magnesium oxide induces immunity against Fusarium wilt by triggering the jasmonic acid signaling pathway in tomato. J. Biotechnol. 325, 100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2020.11.012
Ghanbarzadeh, B., Safaie, N., and Goltapeh, E. M. (2014). Antagonistic activity and hyphal interactions of Trichoderma spp. against Fusarium proliferatum and F. oxysporum in vitro. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 47, 1979–1987. doi: 10.1080/03235408.2013.864506
Gordon, T. R. (2017). Fusarium oxysporum and the Fusarium wilt syndrome. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 55, 23–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080615-095919
Grant, M. and Lamb, C. (2006). Systemic immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9, 414–420. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.013
Hao, Z., Fayolle, L., van Tuinen, D., Chatagnier, O., Li, X., Gianinazzi, S., et al. (2012). Local and systemic mycorrhiza-induced protection against the ectoparasitic nematode Xiphinema index involves priming of defence gene responses in grapevine. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 3657–3672. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers046
Hao, Z., Xie, W., and Chen, B. (2019). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis affects plant immunity to viral infection and accumulation. Viruses 11, 534. doi: 10.3390/v11060534
Harman, G. E., Howell, C. R., Viterbo, A., Chet, I., and Lorito, M. (2004). Trichoderma species - opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 43–56. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro797
Hewedy, O. A., Lateif, K. S. A., Seleiman, M. F., Shami, A., Albarakaty, F. M., El-Meihy, R. M., et al. (2020). Phylogenetic diversity of Trichoderma strains and their antagonistic potential against soil-borne pathogens under stress conditions. Biology 9, 189. doi: 10.3390/biology9080189
Hirano, Y. and Arie, T. (2006). PCR-based differentiation of Fusarium oxysporum ff. sp. lycopersici and radicis-lycopersici and races of F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 72, 273–283. doi: 10.1007/s10327-006-0287-7
Hou, S. and Tsuda, K. (2022). Salicylic acid and jasmonic acid crosstalk in plant immunity. Essays Biochem. 66, 647–656. doi: 10.1042/ebc20210090
Hou, M. and Xu, G. (2025). Growth-defense trade-off in plants: from hypothesis to principle to paradigm. Cell Host Microbe 33, 1222–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2025.05.022
Iqbal, S., Ashfaq, M., Rao, M. J., Khan, K. S., Malik, A. H., Mehmood, M. A., et al. (2024). Trichoderma viride: an eco-friendly biocontrol solution against soil-borne pathogens in vegetables under different soil conditions. Horticulturae 10, 1277. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae10121277
Kampatsikas, I., Bijelic, A., and Rompel, A. (2019). Biochemical and structural characterization of tomato polyphenol oxidases provide novel insights into their substrate specificity. Sci. Rep. 9, 4022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39687-0
Kiers, E. T., Duhamel, M., Beesetty, Y., Mensah, J. A., Franken, O., Verbruggen, E., et al. (2011). Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science 333, 880–882. doi: 10.1126/science.1208473
Li, T., Shi, X., Wang, J., Zhou, Y., Wang, T., Xu, Y., et al. (2025). Turning antagonists into allies: Bacterial-fungal interactions enhance the efficacy of controlling Fusarium wilt disease. Sci. Adv. 11, eads5089. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ads5089
Li, C., Xu, M., Cai, X., Han, Z., Si, J., and Chen, D. (2022). Jasmonate signaling pathway modulates plant defense, growth, and their trade-offs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 3945. doi: 10.3390/ijms23073945
Li, Y., Yang, Y., Hu, Y., Liu, H., He, M., Yang, Z., et al. (2019). DELLA and EDS1 form a feedback regulatory module to fine-tune plant growth-defense tradeoff in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 12, 1485–1498. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.07.003
Liu, X., Jia, P., Cadotte, M. W., Zhu, C., Si, X., Wang, Y., et al. (2021). Host plant environmental filtering drives foliar fungal community assembly in symptomatic leaves. Oecologia 195, 737–749. doi: 10.1007/s00442-021-04849-3
Liu, M., Wang, H., Lin, Z., Ke, J., Zhang, P., Zhang, F., et al. (2024). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inhibit necrotrophic, but not biotrophic, aboveground plant pathogens: a meta-analysis and experimental study. New Phytol. 241, 1308–1320. doi: 10.1111/nph.19392
Lorenzo, O. and Solano, R. (2005). Molecular players regulating the jasmonate signalling network. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8, 532–540. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.07.003
Martinez-Medina, A., Flors, V., Heil, M., Mauch-Mani, B., Pieterse, C. M. J., Pozo, M. J., et al. (2016). Recognizing plant defense priming. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 818–822. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.07.009
Martinez-Medina, A., Pascual, J. A., Lloret, E., and Roldan, A. (2009). Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma harzianum and their effects on Fusarium wilt in melon plants grown in seedling nurseries. J. Sci. Food Agric. 89, 1843–1850. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3660
Martinez-Medina, A., Roldan, A., and Pascual, J. A. (2011). Interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma harzianum under conventional and low input fertilization field condition in melon crops: growth response and Fusarium wilt biocontrol. Appl. Soil Ecol. 47, 98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.11.010
Metwally, R. A. and Al-Amri, S. M. (2020). Individual and interactive role of Trichoderma viride and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and pigment content of onion plants. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 70, 79–86. doi: 10.1111/lam.13246
Mukherjee, P. K., Mendoza-Mendoza, A., Zeilinger, S., and Horwitz, B. A. (2022). Mycoparasitism as a mechanism of Trichoderma-mediated suppression of plant diseases. Fungal Biol. Rev. 39, 15–33. doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2021.11.004
Mukherjee, M., Mukherjee, P. K., Horwitz, B. A., Zachow, C., Berg, G., and Zeilinger, S. (2012). Trichoderma-plant-pathogen interactions: advances in genetics of biological control. Indian J. Microbiol. 52, 522–529. doi: 10.1007/s12088-012-0308-5
Ouyang, S., Park, G., Atamian, H. S., Han, C. S., Stajich, J. E., Kaloshian, I., et al. (2014). MicroRNAs suppress NB domain genes in tomato that confer resistance to Fusarium oxysporum. PloS Pathog. 10, e1004464. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004464
Pfaffl, M. W. (2001). A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e45. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45
Pieterse, C. M. J., Leon-Reyes, A., van der Ent, S., and Van Wees, S. C. M. (2009). Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 308–316. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.164
Robert-Seilaniantz, A., Grant, M., and Jones, J. D. G. (2011). Hormone crosstalk in plant disease and defense: more than just jasmonate-salicylate antagonism. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 49, 317–343. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114447
Salwan, R., Sharma, A., Kaur, R., Sharma, R., and Sharma, V. (2022). The riddles of Trichoderma induced plant immunity. Biol. Control 174, 105037. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.105037
Shi, F., Wang, X., He, X., Xu, T., Jiang, M., Chang, W., et al. (2025). Evaluation of the efficient propagation of Rhizophagus intraradices and its inoculation effects on rice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 91, e00558–e00525. doi: 10.1128/aem.00558-25
Shi, J., Wang, X., and Wang, E. (2023). Mycorrhizal symbiosis in plant growth and stress adaptation: from genes to ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 74, 569–607. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-061722-090342
Singh, P. K., Singh, M., and Vyas, D. (2010). Biocontrol of Fusarium wilt of chickpea using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium leguminosorum biovar. Caryologia 63, 349–353. doi: 10.1080/00087114.2010.10589745
Song, Y., Chen, D., Lu, K., Sun, Z., and Zeng, R. (2015). Enhanced tomato disease resistance primed by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Front. Plant Sci. 6. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00786
Srinivas, C., Devi, D. N., Murthy, K. N., Mohan, C. D., Lakshmeesha, T. R., Singh, B., et al. (2019). Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici causal agent of vascular wilt disease of tomato: biology to diversity—a review. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 26, 1315–1324. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.06.002
Sugiura, Y., Akiyama, R., Tanaka, S., Yano, K., Kameoka, H., Marui, S., et al. (2020). Myristate can be used as a carbon and energy source for the asymbiotic growth of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 25779–25788. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006948117
Tanwar, A., Aggarwal, A., and Panwar, V. (2013). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma viride mediated Fusarium wilt control in tomato. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 23, 485–498. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2013.779518
Thakur, M. P., Quast, V., van Dam, N. M., Eisenhauer, N., Roscher, C., Biere, A., et al. (2019). Interactions between functionally diverse fungal mutualists inconsistently affect plant performance and competition. Oikos 128, 1136–1146. doi: 10.1111/oik.06138
Trivedi, P., Leach, J. E., Tringe, S. G., Sa, T., and Singh, B. K. (2020). Plant-microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 607–621. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1
Vinale, F., Sivasithamparam, K., Ghisalberti, E. L., Marra, R., Barbetti, M. J., Li, H., et al. (2008). A novel role for Trichoderma secondary metabolites in the interactions with plants. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 78, 80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2008.05.005
Wang, H., Hao, Z., Zhang, X., Xie, W., and Chen, B. (2022). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induced plant resistance against Fusarium wilt in jasmonate biosynthesis defective mutant and wild type of tomato. J. Fungi 8, 422. doi: 10.3390/jof8050422
Weng, W., Yan, J., Zhou, M., Yao, X., Gao, A., Ma, C., et al. (2022). Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as a biocontrol agent in the control of plant diseases. Microorganisms 10, 1266. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10071266
Xie, W., Hao, Z., Yu, M., Wu, Z., Zhao, A., Li, J., et al. (2019). Improved phosphorus nutrition by arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis as a key factor facilitating glycyrrhizin and liquiritin accumulation in Glycyrrhiza uralensis. Plant Soil 439, 243–257. doi: 10.1007/s11104-018-3861-9
Yang, Y. X., Ahammed, G. J., Wu, C., Fan, S Y., and Zhou, Y. H.. (2015). Crosstalk among jasmonate, salicylate and ethylene signaling pathways in plant disease and immune responses. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 16, 450–461. doi: 10.2174/1389203716666150330141638
Yağmur, A., Demir, S., Canpolat, S., Rezaee Danesh, Y., Farda, B., Djebaili, R., et al. (2024). Onion fusarium basal rot disease control by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and trichoderma harzianum. Plants (Basel) 13, 386. doi: 10.3390/plants13030386
Zhang, X., Tan, X., and Wang, E. (2025). Networks of the symbiosis-immunity continuum in plants. Cell Host Microbe 33, 1256–1275. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2025.06.009
Zhang, R. Q., Zhu, H. H., Zhao, H. Q., and Yao, Q. (2013). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation increases phenolic synthesis in clover roots via hydrogen peroxide, salicylic acid and nitric oxide signaling pathways. J. Plant Physiol. 170, 74–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.08.022
Zhang, Y. C., Zou, Y. N., Liu, L. P., and Wu, Q. S. (2019). Common mycorrhizal networks activate salicylic acid defense responses of trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 61, 1099–1111. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12743
Zhou, X., Wang, J., Liu, F., Liang, J., Zhao, P., Tsui, C. K. M., et al. (2022). Cross-kingdom synthetic microbiota supports tomato suppression of Fusarium wilt disease. Nat. Commun. 13, 7890. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35452-6
Keywords: plant disease biocontrol, hormonal balance, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Trichoderma harzianum, jasmonic acid, salicylic acid
Citation: Zhang K, Wang H, Xie W, Niu T, Fu W, Zhang X, Hao Z and Chen B (2025) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma harzianum alter salicylic acid–jasmonic acid balance to suppress Fusarium wilt in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1714648. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1714648
Received: 28 September 2025; Accepted: 31 October 2025;
Published: 18 November 2025.
Edited by:
Gustavo Santoyo, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, MexicoReviewed by:
Xin Zhou, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), ChinaXiang Liu, Lanzhou University, China
Amira E. Sehim, Benha University, Egypt
Adrián González Ortega-Villaizán, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain
Copyright © 2025 Zhang, Wang, Xie, Niu, Fu, Zhang, Hao and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhipeng Hao, enBoYW9AcmNlZXMuYWMuY24=
Haixi Wang1,2