REVIEW article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Breeding
Genetic improvement of robusta coffee (Coffea canephora) in the 20th and 21st centuries: Prospects for increasing future breeding effectiveness and impact
Provisionally accepted- 1World Coffee Research, Oregon, United States
- 2Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
- 3Central Coffee Research Institute, Balehonnur, India
- 4Indonesian Coffee and Cocoa Research Institute, Jemba, East Java, Indonesia
- 5National Agricultural Research Organisation, Entebbe, Uganda
- 6Embrapa Cafe, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Brasilia, Brazil
- 7Institute of Research, Technical Assistance and Rural Extension of Espirito Santo (INCAPER),, Vitória,, Brazil
- 8Western Highlands Agriculture and Forestry Science Institute (WASI), Buon Ma Thuot City, Vietnam
- 9Indonesian Coffee and Cocoa Research Institute (ICCRI),, East Java, Indonesia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Robusta coffee (Coffea canephora), with annual global production ranging from 70 to 76 million bags, has a long history of breeding and crop improvement worldwide. However, breeding efforts to address issues such as subpar farmer profitability and low production per robusta tree still rely on time-consuming approaches that have not changed in decades, making it difficult to respond to evolving needs and market demands. Operationally, the most urgent challenges in robusta breeding are the >20-year variety development time, the limited amount of germplasm with elite traits and heritable genetic variation, and the lack of transdisciplinary collaboration. In this review, we lay the groundwork to address these challenges. We examine pioneering robusta breeding programs in Africa (Uganda, Ivory Coast, Cameroon and Ghana), Asia (Indonesia, India, and Vietnam), and Latin America (Brazil), focusing on trait priorities, the breeding methods employed, the types of varieties developed and disseminated, and the genetic knowledge generated, as well as notable missteps and lessons learned. We then highlight and discuss opportunities for improving robusta breeding efficiency and impact with a specific focus on i) the use of clear target product profiles as guidelines for operationalizing demand-led robusta breeding; and ii) strategies to drive and deploy genetic gains in farmer field. Further we highlight entry points that maximize the impact of integrating modern breeding tools (such as genomics-assisted selection and instrument-based phenotyping) to enhance breeding operations. Our view is based on the understanding that effective breeding integrates processes, products, and human skill at a reasonable cost and within a reasonable timeframe to overcome current and anticipated challenges, particularly those brought on by climate change. Finally, we advocate for multilateral collaborations among industry, academia, and governments, as a powerful approach to bolster the development of the much-needed innovations for farmers. We hope that this retrospective review, from which we derive interventions, will improve the effectiveness and impact of robusta breeding at scale.
Keywords: Breeding programs, coffea canephora, Genetic gains, selection, Varieties
Received: 07 Oct 2025; Accepted: 15 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kawuki, Akpertey, Barrera, Berny Mier y Teran, Devasia, Kraft, Akbar, Shivalingu, Sseremba, Teixeira, Rocha, Ha, Wibowo and Humphrey. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Robert Kawuki
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
