Abstract
Salinity stress is a major abiotic constraint that adversely affects the productivity and ornamental value of Gerbera jamesonii Bolus ex Hook. f. This study evaluated the physiological and biochemical responses of two cultivars (‘Zingana’ and ‘Sene Vidi’) to NaCl-induced salinity and examined the mitigation potential of microbial and biostimulant applications. Plants were subjected to six treatments under controlled greenhouse conditions: Control, NaCl, NaCl + Bacteria, NaCl + Proline–IAA, Bacteria, and Proline–IAA. Salinity markedly reduced relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll pigments, and leaf area, while increasing lipid peroxidation (MDA), indicating oxidative and osmotic stress. The bacterial and Proline–IAA treatments, applied either alone or under salinity, alleviated these negative effects by maintaining water status, stabilizing pigments, and lowering MDA levels. The Proline–IAA biostimulant, in particular, enhanced osmotic regulation and chlorophyll preservation, while bacterial inoculation improved overall physiological resilience. Principal component and correlation analyses revealed strong positive associations among RWC, chlorophyll content, and leaf area, whereas MDA was negatively correlated with growth parameters. Overall, both microbial and Proline–IAA applications improved the salinity tolerance of G. jamesonii, supporting their use as sustainable tools for maintaining growth performance and ornamental quality under saline conditions.
1 Introduction
Gerbera jamesonii L. Bolus is among the five most commercially valuable cut flowers worldwide, appreciated for its striking color diversity, long vase life, and year-round demand. According to , Gerbera consistently ranks within the top five traded cut flowers, with annual sales exceeding one billion stems and generating over €130 million in revenue. The global cut-flower industry continues to expand and is expected to grow from USD 39.08 billion in 2024 to USD 51.83 billion by 2030 (). Despite this strong market performance, G. jamesonii remains highly sensitive to salinity, which compromises growth and diminishes aesthetic quality under greenhouse conditions. Elevated electrical conductivity (EC) in the root zone reduces flower yield, chlorophyll content, and relative water content (RWC) (; ).
Salinity is widely recognized as one of the most damaging abiotic stresses, leading to osmotic imbalance, ion toxicity, and oxidative injury that collectively suppress photosynthesis and water uptake (; ). In ornamental species, the degree of salt sensitivity varies greatly, often reflected by changes in pigment composition, ion accumulation, and visible quality traits (). In Gerbera and other floricultural crops, NaCl exposure accelerates pigment degradation and membrane lipid peroxidation, commonly indicated by increased malondialdehyde (MDA) levels (; ). Comparable oxidative trends have been observed in Tagetes and Amaranthus, where salinity elevated MDA but decreased chlorophyll pigments (; ).
Among the physiological adjustments, proline accumulation plays a pivotal role in osmotic regulation and the stabilization of cellular structures (; ; Hayat et al., 2012). Exogenous application of proline has repeatedly been reported to alleviate salt-induced damage by sustaining pigment integrity and RWC in both ornamentals and vegetable crops, including Gerbera and Solanum lycopersicon (; ). Likewise, observed that supplemental proline improved salt acclimation in soybean by modulating osmolyte metabolism through the ornithine–glutamate dual pathway, suggesting its involvement in ion balance and stress signaling. Similar osmolyte-related regulation has been reported in barley under saline conditions ().
Salinity also alters photosynthetic pigment profiles. Typically, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll decline, while carotenoids tend to accumulate owing to their photoprotective and antioxidant functions (; ). Light intensity can further influence these responses; demonstrated that pigment content in halophytes shifts depending on the interaction between salinity and irradiance. Interestingly, some ornamentals such as Tagetes show increased antioxidant activity despite reduced floral size under saline conditions ().
Beyond pigments and osmolytes, secondary metabolites particularly phenolic compounds play an essential role in non-enzymatic antioxidant defense. Their accumulation contributes to the detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and limits lipid peroxidation, thereby protecting cellular membranes (; ). Comparable antioxidant dynamics have been reported in Pistacia vera rootstocks (). Relative water content (RWC) remains a sensitive indicator of plant hydration and an integrative measure of turgor maintenance under stress (). Although many studies have examined individual parameters under saline conditions, comprehensive evaluations that integrate oxidative markers (MDA), osmolyte accumulation (proline), pigment stability (chlorophylls and carotenoids), phenolic metabolism, and water relations (RWC) are still scarce for Gerbera.Recent bibliometric evidence further confirms that abiotic stress research in ornamental plants—including Gerbera—remains considerably underrepresented compared to edible crops, despite increasing scientific interest in stress physiology (). This highlights the need for comprehensive, multi-parameter evaluations in floricultural species to better understand and manage stress responses.
In light of these gaps, the present study aimed to assess the effectiveness of exogenous proline supplemented with indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and plant growth-promoting bacteria (Bacillus megaterium, Paenibacillus polymyxa, Pantoea agglomerans, and Pseudomonas fluorescens) in mitigating salinity stress in two Gerbera cultivars. We hypothesized that these treatments would alleviate salt-induced injury by enhancing osmotic adjustment, preserving pigment stability, and reinforcing non-enzymatic antioxidant capacity. Importantly, this work provides the first integrative evaluation of proline- and PGPR-mediated mitigation of salinity in Gerbera jamesonii at combined morphological, physiological, and biochemical levels, thereby addressing a critical knowledge gap in ornamental stress physiology.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Plant material and growth conditions
The experiment was conducted in the greenhouse facilities of the Faculty of Agriculture, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University (Rize, Türkiye) under controlled environmental conditions during July. The 60 m2 polycarbonate greenhouse maintained average daytime temperatures of 24–28°C and nighttime temperatures of 18–20°C, with 70–80% relative humidity and a natural photoperiod of approximately 14–15 h.Two commercial cultivars of Gerbera jamesonii L. ‘Zingana’ (red flowers) and ‘Sene Vidi’ (white flowers)—were grown in 0.5 L plastic pots filled with a sand:peat mixture (1:2, v/v) having an initial electrical conductivity (EC) of 1.2–1.5 dS m−1 and a pH between 5.5 and 6.2. Before treatment application, plants were irrigated with tap water and fertilized weekly with a balanced 20:20:20 NPK solution (150 mg L−1). Salinity stress was initiated when plants reached the early vegetative stage (4–5 fully expanded leaves), recognized as a sensitive phase for salinity evaluation ().
2.2 Experimental design and treatments
The study followed a completely randomized design (CRD) with six treatments and three replications. Each replicate included three plants, making a total of 54 plants (6 × 3 × 3). Treatments were as follows: (1) Control (C) without salinity stress, (ii) NaCl (S) applied at 150 mM, (iii) Proline–IAA (P) consisting of a commercial formulation containing L-proline and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (Supersol®, Türkiye), (iv) PGPR (B) inoculation using a microbial biostimulant containing Bacillus megaterium, Paenibacillus polymyxa, Pantoea agglomerans, and Pseudomonas fluorescens (Supersol®, Türkiye), (v) the combined NaCl + Proline–IAA (S + P) treatment, and (vi) the combined NaCl + PGPR (S + B) treatment. Salinity was induced with 150 mM NaCl, applied in two steps (75 mM per day) to avoid osmotic shock. The concentration of 150 mM NaCl was selected based on previous studies showing that this level induces a strong salinity stress in Gerbera jamesonii without causing immediate plant collapse. In particular, and demonstrated that gerbera cultivars exposed to 150 mM NaCl exhibit marked oxidative damage, pigment loss, and clear reductions in physiological performance. Moreover, a recent review by highlights that NaCl concentrations within the 100–200 mM range are widely used to impose reproducible salinity stress in sensitive ornamental species. The Proline–IAA treatment was applied as a commercial Supersol® biostimulant containing L-proline and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) at a dosage of 50 mL pot−1 (equivalent to 20 mM proline). The exact concentration of IAA is proprietary and not disclosed by the manufacturer; however, the formulation was applied strictly according to the recommended usage instructions. The PGPR treatment consisted of a rhizobacterial consortium (SS-Super Root®, Turkey) containing Bacillus megaterium, Paenibacillus polymyxa, Pantoea agglomerans, and Pseudomonas fluorescens at a density of 108 CFU mL−1. For application, 50 mL of the commercial inoculum was mixed with 1 L of water to prepare the working solution, and this mixture was applied as a 10-mL soil drench per pot at the start of the experiment. As this product is a standardized proprietary formulation, the manufacturer does not disclose the relative strain ratios. The inoculum was applied once at the beginning of the experiment as a soil drench at 10 mL per plant, delivered directly to the root zone. No repeated applications or additional nutrient supplementation were used during the stress period. In the combined treatments, NaCl stress and biostimulant applications were imposed simultaneously.
2.3 Measurement and evaluation schedule
Observations were made at three growth stages Initial (Day 0), Intermediate (Day 14), and Final (Day 30) defined according to visible leaf symptoms and substrate EC. Measurements were conducted on Day 14, selected as an intermediate time point within the 2–3 week in which salinity-induced pigment, osmolytes, and oxidative responses have been reported in Gerbera jamesonii (; ; ). Plant height and leaf number were recorded at the final stage, while biochemical traits (malondialdehyde [MDA], proline, total phenolics, and carotenoids) were measured at the intermediate stage. Physiological parameters (RWC, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a/b ratio and leaf area) were assessed across all three stages to capture early and cumulative responses.
2.4 Morphological measurements
Plant height and leaf number were measured manually with a ruler and direct counts. Leaf area was determined using an image analysis system (WinDIAS 3, Delta-T Devices Ltd., Cambridge, UK) as described by .
2.5 Physiological analysis
Relative water content (RWC, %) was determined following :
where FW = fresh weight, TW = turgid weight after 4 h rehydration, and DW = dry weight after drying at 70°C for 48 h.
2.6 Biochemical analyses
Malondialdehyde (MDA): Lipid peroxidation was estimated using the method of , modified by . Leaf samples (0.2 g) were homogenized in 5 mL of 0.1% (w/v) TCA and centrifuged at 12, 000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant (2 mL) was mixed with 2 mL of 20% TCA containing 0.5% (w/v) TBA, incubated at 90°C for 30 min, cooled on ice, and centrifuged again. Absorbance was read at 532 and 600 nm (Shimadzu UV-1800, Japan). MDA concentration was calculated using ϵ = 155 mM−1 cm−1 and expressed as µmol g−1 FW.
Proline Content: Determined according to . Leaf tissue (0.1 g) was homogenized in 3% sulfosalicylic acid, centrifuged at 10, 000 × g for 10 min, and the supernatant was reacted with acid ninhydrin reagent (2.5 g ninhydrin in 60 mL glacial acetic acid + 40 mL orthophosphoric acid). After incubation at 100°C for 30 min, the mixture was extracted with 5 mL toluene, and absorbance was recorded at 528 nm. Proline concentration was calculated from a standard curve.
Total Phenolic Content (TPC): Measured using the Folin–Ciocalteu method (). Leaf extracts (0.2 mL) were mixed with 1.0 mL of diluted Folin reagent (1:10) and 0.8 mL of 7.5% Na2CO3. After 30 min in darkness, absorbance was read at 765 nm and expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE) g−1 FW.
2.7 Photosynthetic pigments
Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a/b ratio, and carotenoids were quantified following . Fresh leaf tissue (0.1 g) was homogenized in 5 mL of 80% acetone, centrifuged at 5, 000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C, and absorbance was measured at 663, 645, and 470 nm. Calculations followed the standard equations:
2.8 Instrumentation
Spectrophotometric readings (MDA, proline, TPC, chlorophylls, and carotenoids) were obtained using a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan) with 1-cm quartz cuvettes. Calibration was performed with appropriate blanks before each measurement.
2.9 Statistical analyses
Data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA (treatment × time) in JMP Pro 17.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were verified prior to analysis. For variables measured at multiple time points (leaf area, RWC, pigment traits, and biochemical parameters), the treatment × time ANOVA was performed separately for each cultivar because preliminary tests indicated significant cultivar effects. For single-time-point variables (plant height and leaf number), both cultivars were analyzed jointly with treatment as the main factor. When ANOVA indicated significant effects, mean separations were conducted using Tukey’s HSD test (p< 0.05).Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to explore associations among traits. Multivariate relationships were further examined using principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering (heatmap).
3 Results
This section describes the effects of salinity stress and mitigation treatments (proline and bacterial inoculation) on the morphological, physiological, and biochemical responses of Gerbera jamesonii cultivars. Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s HSD test at p ≤ 0.05.
3.1 Effects of salinity and mitigation treatments on plant growth
Salinity stress significantly reduced plant height, leaf number, and leaf area in both cultivars and altered additional physiological and biochemical parameters, as shown in Table 1 (Figures 1, 2). Table 1 also provides the mean ± SE values for each parameter, allowing clearer interpretation of the magnitude and practical relevance of treatment effects beyond the ANOVA statistics. Plants exposed to NaCl exhibited restricted leaf expansion and shortened shoots, indicating growth inhibition. In ‘Sene Vidi’, NaCl reduced plant height to ~40 cm, while control plants reached ~62–63 cm. In ‘Zingana’, NaCl reduced plant height to ~52–53 cm compared with ~70 cm in the control. Leaf number also decreased markedly in both cultivars, falling to ~4 leaves under NaCl compared with ~6–7 leaves in the controls.Exogenous proline and bacterial inoculation effectively alleviated these adverse effects and improved vegetative growth. In ‘Sene Vidi’, proline-treated plants reached ~59 cm, nearly matching control levels and exceeding the NaCl treatment by ~17–18 cm. Leaf number also increased to ~6 leaves compared with ~4 leaves under NaCl. Final-stage leaf area increased from ~70 cm2 (NaCl) to ~120–130 cm2 with proline.
Table 1
| Parameter | PH | NL | LA | RWC | Chl a | Chl b | Chl a+b | Chl a/b | Carot | MDA | Pro | TPhenol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DF | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
| Mean+SE | 57.19 ± 1.60 | 5.52 ± 1.15 | 110.81 ± 5.03 | 77.66 ± 0.62 | 0.47 ± 0.009 | 0.21 ± 0.006 | 0.68 ± 0.01 | 2.35 ± 0.09 | 2.49 ± 0.07 | 1.90 ± 0.24 | 0.60 ± 0.03 | 3.85 ± 0.05 |
| Mean square | 270.755 | 2.452 | 2925.090 | 207.250 | 0.0412 | 0.0136 | 0.131 | 0.314 | 0.595 | 68.785 | 0.127 | 4.773 |
| F-value | 24.865 | 2.942 | 60.646 | 7.852 | 49.653 | 67.874 | 92.760 | 8.331 | 23.826 | 491.681 | 153.780 | 2.515 |
| p-value | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.001 | <0.0001 |
| Significance | ***** | * | **** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Analyses of variance for morphological, physiological, and biochemical parameters of Gerbera jamesonii under salinity and stress-relief treatments.
*, ***, **** and ***** indicate significance at p< 0.05, p< 0.01, p< 0.001, and p< 0.0001, respectively. PH, plant height (cm); NL, number of leaves; LA, leaf area (cm2); RWC, relative water content (%); Chl a, chlorophyll a (mg g−1 FW); Chl b, chlorophyll b (mg g−1 FW); Chl a + b, total chlorophyll (mg g−1 FW); Chl a/b, chlorophyll a/b ratio; Carot, carotenoids (mg g−1 FW); MDA, malondialdehyde (nmol g−1 FW); Pro, proline (µmol g−1 FW); TPhenol, total phenolic content (mg g−1 FW).
Figure 1
Figure 2
In ‘Zingana’, proline likewise enhanced growth, increasing final leaf area from ~53–58 cm2 (NaCl) to ~130–140 cm2. Bacterial inoculation produced moderate improvements, increasing plant height from ~52–53 cm (NaCl) to ~66–68 cm and leaf area from ~66–68 cm2 to ~140–145 cm2. These findings demonstrate that exogenous proline enhances vegetative development and preserves photosynthetic surface area under salinity stress in Gerbera jamesonii.
3.2 Relative water content
Salinity markedly decreased RWC compared with the control (Figure 3). The reduction was stronger in ‘Zingana’ than in ‘Sene Vidi’, indicating cultivar differences in water retention capacity.Both mitigation treatments increased RWC relative to the NaCl control. Proline consistently maintained the highest RWC across measurement periods, supporting its role in osmotic adjustment and membrane protection.Bacterial inoculation produced a delayed but positive effect, becoming significant in the final measurement. The NaCl + Proline IAA treatment sustained the greatest leaf hydration throughout the experiment, confirming its efficiency in maintaining water balance under salinity.
Figure 3
3.3 Photosynthetic pigment composition
Salinity significantly altered pigment composition (Figure 4). Both chlorophyll a and b decreased under NaCl stress, while the chlorophyll a/b ratio slightly increased, indicating preferential degradation of chlorophyll b. Proline-treated plants showed higher chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll contents compared with salt-stressed plants. Bacterial inoculation produced moderate improvements, and the NaCl + Proline IAA treatment yielded the highest total chlorophyll concentrations. These results indicate that exogenous proline effectively preserves photosynthetic pigments and delays chlorophyll degradation under salinity stress in Gerbera jamesonii.
Figure 4
3.4 Oxidative stress indicators and osmoprotectant accumulation
Salinity stress significantly increased malondialdehyde (MDA) content, confirming oxidative membrane injury (Figure 5A). Both proline and bacterial treatments reduced MDA levels compared with the salt-stressed control, with the NaCl + Proline IAA (S + PI) combination showing the strongest mitigation effect. Proline accumulation (Figure 5B) markedly increased under salinity and was further enhanced by exogenous application, indicating both uptake and induced synthesis. Bacterial inoculation also elevated proline, reflecting partial activation of osmoprotective metabolism. Carotenoids (Figure 5C) and total phenolics (Figure 5D) were significantly upregulated under mitigation treatments, highlighting their roles in non-enzymatic antioxidant defense. Overall, proline-IAA provided superior protection against oxidative stress, while bacterial inoculation contributed moderately by stimulating secondary antioxidant metabolism in Gerbera jamesonii.
Figure 5
3.6 Multivariate relationships among physiological and biochemical traits
To better understand the interrelationships among morphological, physiological, and biochemical parameters under salinity stress, Pearson correlation analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed.
3.6.1 Principal component analysis
The PCA biplot (PC1 = 33.7% and PC2 = 25%, explaining a total of 58.7% of the variance) clearly separated treatments and visualized their associations with key physiological and biochemical traits (Figure 6). The first component (PC1) was mainly associated with morphological and pigment traits (PH, NL, LA, Chl a, Chl b, Chl a + b, RWC), while the second component (PC2) was dominated by biochemical parameters (MDA, proline, carotenoids, and total phenols). Treatments containing proline, particularly the NaCl + Proline IAA combination, clustered closely with chlorophyll fractions and RWC, indicating enhanced pigment stability and water balance under saline conditions. In contrast, NaCl-stressed plants were positioned near the MDA vector, reflecting increased oxidative injury and reduced physiological performance. The overall PCA pattern demonstrated that proline + IAA supplementation effectively mitigated salinity effects by coordinating osmotic adjustment and antioxidant protection mechanisms in Gerbera jamesonii.
Figure 6
3.6.2 Correlation and heatmap analysis
The correlation matrix (Figure 7A) revealed strong positive associations among growth (PH, NL, LA) and pigment parameters (Chl a, Chl b, total Chl). In contrast, MDA was negatively correlated with these traits, confirming its role as an indicator of oxidative stress. Carotenoids and phenols showed moderate positive correlations, suggesting coordinated activation of antioxidant metabolism. The standardized Z-score heatmap (Figure 7B) further supported these relationships, showing clear clustering of treatments based on stress intensity. The NaCl + Proline IAA treatment exhibited the most favorable physiological and biochemical profile, characterized by high chlorophyll, carotenoid, and phenolic contents alongside the lowest MDA levels.
Figure 7
4 Discussion
Salinity imposes complex physiological and biochemical constraints on plant systems by disturbing osmotic balance and enhancing oxidative stress. These disruptions adversely affect water relations, photosynthetic efficiency, and membrane stability, thereby compromising overall plant vigor. In the present study, Gerbera jamesonii exhibited typical salt-stress symptoms, including pigment loss and reduced leaf turgor, confirming its high sensitivity to NaCl. The application of stress-relief treatments, particularly Proline IAA and bacterial inoculation, improved tolerance by maintaining water status, protecting pigments, and limiting oxidative injury. The following sections discuss these coordinated responses through specific indicators such as MDA, RWC, pigments, and antioxidant metabolites.
4.1 Oxidative stress indicators (MDA)
Salinity stress induced a strong accumulation of malondialdehyde (MDA), indicating enhanced lipid peroxidation and oxidative injury. In this study, MDA levels increased by approximately 68% under NaCl treatment compared with the control, confirming oxidative membrane damage. Similar oxidative trends appeared in the PCA and heatmap analyses, where MDA vectors opposed RWC and chlorophyll fractions, highlighting negative correlations between oxidative stress and physiological performance. These results align with and , who reported that prolonged salt exposure in G. jamesonii reduced chlorophyll and water balance via oxidative membrane injury. Recent reviews also emphasize that ROS overproduction under salinity triggers lipid peroxidation and photosynthetic inhibition (; ). Exogenous Proline IAA application, particularly in the S + PI treatment, reduced MDA by nearly 28% relative to the salt control, indicating osmolyte-assisted protection.
4.2 Proline accumulation and water relations (RWC)
Proline concentrations rose sharply under NaCl stress (approximately 2.3–2.6-fold compared with the control), confirming its central role in osmotic adjustment. The S + PI treatment maintained proline at approximately 2.0–2.3× control levels while supporting higher RWC, showing that exogenous supplementation enhanced endogenous accumulation and prevented excessive stress spikes. Bacterial inoculation and Proline IAA alone caused moderate increases, indicating a graded osmotic response. These findings correspond with and , who linked proline accumulation to upregulated stress proteins and improved leaf hydration. Mechanistically, proline contributes to ROS detoxification by modulating the glutathione–ascorbate cycle (). PCA and correlation analyses further confirmed positive loadings of proline with RWC and negative associations with MDA, consistent with . Recent studies using different biostimulants further support this pattern. Silicon nanoparticles were reported to alleviate salinity-induced oxidative stress in Salvia officinalis by enhancing ROS scavenging and stabilizing membrane function (). Likewise, melatonin improved drought tolerance in Taxus baccata by increasing osmolyte accumulation and antioxidant activity (), while methyl jasmonate reduced lipid peroxidation and promoted osmotic adjustment in Narcissus under salt stress (). These findings indicate that improved redox balance and osmotic regulation represent a shared mechanism across biostimulant strategies, aligning closely with the proline-mediated responses observed in Gerbera jamesonii.”.
4.3 Photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a/b ratio, and carotenoids)
NaCl stress caused marked reductions (approximately 30–35%) in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll, verifying the high pigment sensitivity of G. jamesonii. Partial pigment recovery under Proline IAA reflected osmolyte-mediated stabilization of chlorophyll–protein complexes and thylakoid membranes. Similar improvements were observed in G. jamesonii treated with salicylic acid () and in Chrysanthemum (). The concurrent rise in carotenoids (approximately 25–30%) under saline conditions and biostimulant treatments indicated enhanced photoprotection through singlet oxygen quenching, consistent with findings in Tagetes, Pistacia vera, and SiO2-NP-treated Gerbera (; ; ).
4.4 Phenolic and carotenoid dynamics (non-enzymatic antioxidant response)
Total phenolics increased to 4.5 mg GAE g−1 FW in S + PI (approximately 25% above the control) and 4.1 mg GAE g−1 FW in S + B, indicating improved antioxidant potential. A comparable phenolic–carotenoid co-regulation under salt stress was also observed. Carotenoid content also rose to approximately 3.2 mg g−1 FW under salinity, reflecting activation of photoprotective mechanisms. Combined treatments maintained moderate carotenoid levels (approximately 2.6–2.7 mg g−1 FW), suggesting optimized ROS control without excessive pigment accumulation. PCA and correlation analyses showed carotenoids clustering positively with RWC and phenolics but negatively with MDA, confirming coordinated antioxidant regulation. Similar metabolic coordination between phenolics and carotenoids under PGPR and osmolyte treatments has been documented in recent PGPR studies (), as documented by , who linked secondary metabolite accumulation to improved ionic homeostasis in ornamentals. Similar increases in phenolic compounds contributing to enhanced antioxidant capacity under abiotic stress conditions have also been reported following silicon-based stress mitigation strategies ().
4.5 Integrated biochemical response under salinity and biostimulant treatments
Multivariate analyses reinforced this physiological narrative. The PCA biplot (PC1 = 33.7% and PC2 = 25.0%, together explaining 58.7% of the total variance) illustrated coordinated regulation among oxidative, osmotic, and pigment traits, clearly separating treatments and visualizing their associations with key physiological and biochemical parameters (Figure 7). In the ordination space, proline, carotenoids, and RWC loaded in the same quadrant as chlorophyll a + b, while MDA pointed in the opposite direction, mirroring their negative correlations in the Pearson matrix. Treatment ordination separated S (high MDA, low RWC and pigments) from S + PI (elevated RWC and pigments), confirming that osmolyte–auxin supplementation repositioned plants toward a hydrated, pigment-preserving state. This integrative response aligns with , who emphasized carotenoid- and phenolic-based non-enzymatic protection under salinity, and with , who highlighted signal transduction links between ionic balance and redox pathways. Comparable multivariate coordination between osmotic balance and antioxidant protection was also reported in Zinnia elegans, where exogenous putrescine enhanced antioxidant activity, potassium uptake, and pigment stability under NaCl stress (). These responses closely parallel the the osmolyte antioxidant interactions observed in the present study. Similar PCA-based clustering of stress-alleviated groups was observed in Brassica napus (). Furthermore, demonstrated that PGPR-driven auxin modulation enhances osmolyte metabolism and salinity tolerance, supporting the mechanistic framework observed in the S + PI and S + B treatments. Likewise, reported that auxin metabolism and signaling interact dynamically with osmolyte accumulation and antioxidant regulation, forming an integrated network that fine-tunes abiotic stress responses. Although the present study primarily focused on non-enzymatic antioxidant responses (MDA, proline, carotenoids, and phenolics), future research should integrate enzymatic antioxidant markers (e.g., SOD, CAT, POD) to provide a more complete understanding of redox regulation under salinity stress in Gerbera. These findings reinforce that exogenous Proline IAA application strengthens stress resilience through cross-talk between hormonal and redox-protective pathways. Similarly, found that biostimulant application in apple trees enhanced pigment stability, increased relative water content, and reduced lipid peroxidation by reinforcing proline–phenolic metabolism, mirroring the integrative osmotic–antioxidant regulation observed in G. jamesonii. Consistent multivariate evidence also comes from wheat under silicon supplementation, where PCA and correlation analyses separated salinity-only plants from Si-treated ones and linked higher RWC and chlorophyll/carotenoid levels with lower MDA and electrolyte leakage under NaCl stress (). Collectively, Proline IAA and bacterial inoculation acted through complementary physiological pathways involving osmotic regulation, phenolic metabolism, and non-enzymatic ROS detoxification, ensuring pigment stability, membrane integrity, and enhanced salt tolerance in G. jamesonii.
4.6 Cultivar-specific morphophysiological responses
The two Gerbera cultivars responded to salinity in the same direction, but the severity of the response differed. Under NaCl stress, Sene Vidi showed greater reductions in plant height, leaf number and leaf area, confirming its higher sensitivity (). Zingana maintained larger leaves and better overall growth, which aligns with studies in other crop species where tolerant cultivars preserve vegetative performance under salinity (; ). The mitigation treatments also separated the cultivars: Proline–IAA improved growth more clearly in Sene Vidi, while PGPR was more effective in Zingana, especially for leaf area and pigment retention (). Biochemical traits supported this distinction; Sene Vidi accumulated more MDA, whereas Zingana preserved chlorophyll and phenolics more consistently (). PCA further reflected these differences, with Sene Vidi associating with proline and RWC and Zingana aligning with carotenoids and phenolics (). Overall, Sene Vidi coped mainly through osmotic adjustment, while Zingana relied more on pigment maintenance and antioxidant capacity.
5 Conclusions
Salinity stress induced by NaCl markedly disrupted the physiological and biochemical homeostasis of Gerbera jamesonii, leading to impaired water regulation, accelerated chlorophyll degradation, and intensified oxidative membrane damage. The application of Proline IAA effectively alleviated these detrimental effects by enhancing osmotic adjustment, maintaining relative water content, and stabilizing chlorophyll pigments. This treatment also reduced lipid peroxidation (MDA) and promoted the accumulation of non-enzymatic antioxidants such as carotenoids and phenolic compounds, thereby restoring cellular redox balance under saline conditions. Positive correlations among RWC, pigment stability, and antioxidant activity further confirm that Proline IAA strengthens salinity tolerance through coordinated osmotic and oxidative protection mechanisms. Overall, these findings highlight Proline IAA as a sustainable and eco-compatible biostimulant capable of maintaining physiological integrity and ornamental quality in greenhouse-grown Gerbera. Future studies should focus on elucidating the molecular and enzymatic pathways underlying this response and validating its long-term efficacy under commercial production systems.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
ÜK: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Supervision.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Development Foundation (Grant No. 02025012001845).
Acknowledgments
The author sincerely thanks Assoc. Prof. Dr. Filiz Boyacı for her valuable guidance and supervision during the biochemical analyses. Special thanks are extended to M.Sc. student Sümeyye İslam for her indispensable assistance throughout the experimental and analytical phases, and to Ph.D. student Melike Şahin and M.Sc. student Merve Erbil for their valuable contributions. This study did not receive financial support from any funding agency or organization.
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbdullahM.MahmoodA.BibiS.NaqveM.JavaidM. M.ZiaM. A.et al. (2022). Physiological, biochemical, and yield responses of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) in α-tocopherol-mediated alleviation of salinity stress. Front. Plant Sci.13, 867172. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.867172
2
AcharyaB. R.GillS. P.KaundalA.SandhuD. (2024). Strategies for combating plant salinity stress: the potential of plant growth-promoting microorganisms. Front. Plant Sci.15, 1406913. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1406913
3
Acosta-MotosJ. R.OrtuñoM. F.Bernal-VicenteA.Diaz-VivancosP.Sanchez-BlancoM. J.HernandezJ. A. (2017). Plant responses to salt stress: Adaptive mechanisms. Agronomy7, 18. doi: 10.3390/agronomy7010018
4
AhsanM.ValipourM.NawazF.RaheelM.AbbasH. T.SajidM.et al. (2023). Evaluation of silicon supplementation for drought stress under water-deficit conditions: an application of sustainable agriculture. Agronomy13, 599. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13020599
5
Al-TurkiA.MuraliM.OmarA. F.RehanM.SayyedR. Z. (2023). Recent advances in PGPR-mediated resilience toward interactive effects of drought and salt stress in plants. Front. Microbiol.14, 1214845. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1214845
6
ArnonD. I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol.24, 1–15. doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1
7
AshrafM. F. M. R.FooladM. R. (2007). Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ. Exp. Bot.59, 206–216. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006
8
BatesL. S.WaldrenR. P. A.TeareI. D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil39, 205–207. doi: 10.1007/BF00018060
9
BayatH.ShafieF.ShahrakiB. (2022). Salinity effects on growth, chlorophyll content, total phenols, and antioxidant activity in Salvia lavandulifolia Vahl. Adv. Hortic. Sci.36, 145–153. doi: 10.36253/ahsc-12411
10
BoussoraF.TrikiT.BennaniL.BaguesM.Ben AliS.FerchichiA.et al. (2024). Mineral accumulation, relative water content and gas exchange are the main physiological regulating mechanisms to cope with salt stress in barley. Sci. Rep.14, 14931. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61968-0
11
ChrysargyrisA.TzionisA.XyliaP.TzortzakisN. (2018). Effects of salinity on Tagetes growth, physiology, and shelf life of edible flowers stored in passive modified atmosphere packaging or treated with ethanol. Front. Plant Sci.9, 1765. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01765
12
CioćM.DziurkaM.PawłowskaB. (2022). Changes in endogenous phytohormones of Gerbera jamesonii axillary shoots multiplied under different light emitting diodes light quality. Molecules27, 1804. doi: 10.3390/molecules27061804
13
DonK. K. G.XiaY. P.ZhuZ.LeC.WijeratneA. W. (2010). Some deleterious effects of long-term salt stress on growth, nutrition, and physiology of Gerbera jamesonii L. and potential indicators of its salt tolerance. J. Plant Nutr.33, 2010–2027. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2010.519080
14
DoozR. T.NaderiD.KalatehjariS.GharnehH. A. A.JahromiM. G. (2024). Methyl jasmonate’s role in alleviating salt stress-induced challenges in narcissus growth. Biol. Bull.51, 586–601. doi: 10.1134/S1062359023605694
15
El-BannaM. F.MosaA. (2024). Exogenous application of proline mitigates deteriorative effects of salinity stress in NFT closed-loop system: An ultrastructural and physio-biochemical investigation on hydroponically grown tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.). Sci. Hortic.330, 113061. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113061
16
FarooqF.AkramS.AliM.RazaA. (2025). Exogenous proline enhances salt acclimation in soybean seedlings: Modifying physicochemical properties and controlling proline metabolism through the ornithine–glutamate dual pathway. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.294, 118012. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.118012
17
FarooqM.UzmaJ.DayakarT.PizzioG. A.MamidalaP. (2023). Ascorbic acid mediated Salt Tolerance in Gerbera jamesonii: A Promising Strategy for Sustainable Floriculture. (Basel, Switzerland: MDPI, Preprints.org). doi: 10.20944/preprints202310.1739.v1
18
FarooqM.UzmaJ.MamidalaP. (2025). Salicylic acid induced salt tolerance in Gerbera jamesonii, an ornamental plant. Vegetos38, 582–589. doi: 10.1007/s42535-024-00884-8
19
FitznerM.SchreinerM.BaldermannS. (2023). The interaction of salinity and light regime modulates photosynthetic pigment content in edible halophytes in greenhouse and indoor farming. Front. Plant Sci.14, 1105162. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1105162
20
García-CaparrósP.LaoM. T. (2018). The effects of salt stress on ornamental plants and integrative cultivation practices. Sci. Hortic.240, 430–439. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.06.060
21
GillS. S.TutejaN. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem.48, 909–930. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016
22
Grand View Research (2025). Cut flowers market size, share & Trends analysis report (San Francisco, CA, USA: Grand View Research Inc.). Available online at: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/cut-flowers-market-report (Accessed October 06, 2025).
23
GuzmanM. R.MarquesI. (2023). Effect of varied salinity on marigold flowers: Reduced size and quantity despite enhanced antioxidant activity. Agronomy13, 3076. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13123076
24
HajizadehH. S.AsadiM.ZahediS. M.HamzehpourN.RasouliF.HelvacıM.et al. (2021). Silicon dioxide-nanoparticle nutrition mitigates salinity in gerbera by modulating ion accumulation and antioxidants. Folia Hortic.33, 91–105. Available online at: http://www.foliahort.ogr.ur.krakow.pl (Accessed October 06, 2025).
25
HameedA.AhmedM. Z.HussainT.AzizI.AhmadN.GulB.et al. (2021). Effects of salinity stress on chloroplast structure and function. Cells10, 2023. doi: 10.3390/cells10082023
26
HameedA.KhanM. A.TahirM. H. N.LodhiM. S.MuzammilS.ShafiqM.et al. (2025). In Silico identification and characterization of SOS gene family in soybean: Potential of calcium in salinity stress mitigation. PLoS One20, e0317612. doi: 10.4161/psb.21949
27
HayatS.HayatQ.AlyemeniM. N.WaniA. S.PichtelJ.AhmadA. (2012). Role of proline under changing environments: a review. Plant Signaling & Behavior7, 1456–1466. doi: 10.4161/psb.21949
28
HeathR. L.PackerL. (1968). Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.125, 189–198. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(68)90500-6
29
HnilickovaH.KrausK.VachovaP.HnilickaF. (2021). Salinity stress affects photosynthesis, malondialdehyde formation, and proline content in Portulaca oleracea L. Plants10, 845. doi: 10.3390/plants10050845
30
HossainM. N.SarkerU.RaihanM. S.Al-HuqailA. A.SiddiquiM. H.ObaS. (2022). Influence of salinity stress on color parameters, leaf pigmentation, polyphenol and flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activity of Amaranthus lividus. Molecules27, 1821. doi: 10.3390/molecules27061821
31
KaragüzelÜ.Ö. (2025). Blossoms amid drought: A bibliometric mapping of research on drought stress in ornamental. Front. Plant Sci.16, 1644092. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1644092
32
KhedrA. H. A.AbbasM. A.WahidA. A. A.QuickW. P.AbogadallahG. M. (2003). Proline induces the expression of salt-stress-responsive proteins and may improve the adaptation of Pancratium maritimum L. to salt stress. J. Exp. Bot.54, 2553–2562. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg277
33
KıranS.Baysal FurtanaG.EllialtıoğluŞ.Ş. (2022). Physiological and biochemical assay of drought stress responses in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) inoculated with commercial inoculant of Azotobacter chroococcum and. Azotobacter Vinelandii. Sci. Hortic.305, 111394. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111394
34
KumaraK.AmpitiyawattaA. D.PadmaperumaA.BeneragamaC.PingX. Y. (2021). Alleviation of salt-induced adverse effects on gas exchange, photosynthetic pigment content and chloroplast ultrastructure in Gerbera jamesonii L. by exogenous salicylic acid application. Asian J. Res. Agric. For.7, 1–13. Available online at: http://www.sdiarticle4.com/review-history/68651 (Accessed October 06, 2025).
35
LacerdaC. F. D.OliveiraE. V. D.NevesA. L.GheyiH. R.BezerraM. A.CostaC. A. (2020). Morphophysiological responses and mechanisms of salt tolerance in four ornamental perennial species under tropical climate. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambient.24, 656–663. doi: 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v24n10p656-663
36
LiuC.JiangX.YuanZ. (2024). Plant responses and adaptations to salt stress: A review. Horticulturae10, 1221. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae10111221
37
MarascoR.MosqueiraM. J.SeferjiK. A.Al RomaihS. M.MichoudG.XuJ.et al. (2024). Desert-adapted plant growth-promoting pseudomonads modulate plant auxin homeostasis and mitigate salinity stress. Microb. Biotechnol.17, e70043. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70043
38
MohammadiM.NezamdoostD.Khosravi FarF.ZulfiqarF.EghlimaG.AghamirF. (2024). Exogenous putrescine application imparts salt stress-induced oxidative stress tolerance via regulating antioxidant activity, potassium uptake, and abscisic acid to gibberellin ratio in Zinnia flowers. BMC Plant Biol.24, 865. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05560-0
39
MunnsR.TesterM. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.59, 651–681. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
40
MusazadeE.MrishoI. I.FengX. (2025). Auxin metabolism and signaling: Integrating independent mechanisms and crosstalk in plant abiotic stress responses. Plant Stress18, 101034. doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2025.101034
41
NakhaieA.HabibiG.VaziriA. (2022). Exogenous proline enhances salt tolerance in acclimated Aloe vera by modulating photosystem II efficiency and antioxidant defense. S. Afr. J. Bot.147, 1171–1180. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2020.06.005
42
OzherelievaZ. E. E.PrudnikovP. S.StupinaA. Y. E.BolgovaA. O. (2025). The effects of biostimulants on the physiological processes of yield formation and resistance of apples to spring frosts. Horticulturae11, 1075. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae11091075
43
RahneshanZ.NasibiF.MoghadamA. A. (2018). Effects of salinity stress on some growth, physiological, biochemical parameters and nutrients in two pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) rootstocks. J. Plant Interact.13, 73–82. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2018.1424355
44
RenzettiM.FunckD.TrovatoM. (2024). Proline and ROS: A unified mechanism in plant development and stress response? Plants14, 2. doi: 10.3390/plants14010002
45
RiazM.NoreenZ.UsmanS.ShahA. A.ZafarF.AshrafS.et al. (2025). Nitric oxide and arginine mitigate salt stress through physio-biochemical modulations and ion regulation in Brassica napus L. Sci. Rep.15, 33204. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17887-1
46
Royal FloraHolland (2020). Facts & Figures 2020 (Aalsmeer, The Netherlands: Royal FloraHolland). Available online at: https://np-royalfloraholland-production.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/8-Over-ons/Documenten/royal-floraholland-facts-and-figures-2020.pdf (Accessed October 06, 2025).
47
SaraçoğluÖ.A.MeriçM. K.Tüzelİ.H.Kukul KurttaşY. S. (2019). “ Responses of Gerbera jamesonii plants to different salinity levels and leaching ratios when grown in soilless culture,” in Plant abiotic stress tolerance: agronomic, molecular and biotechnological approaches. Eds. HasanuzzamanM.NaharK.FujitaM. ( Springer, Cham, Switzerland). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-06118-0_15
48
ShahmohammadiF.JahromiM. G.FarhadpourM.JariS. K.TorkashvandA. M. (2024). Foliar-applied melatonin modulated drought stress through modifying some important physiological and phytochemical characteristics in Taxus baccata L. Plant Soil495, 551–566. doi: 10.1007/s11104-023-06343-6
49
ShahpariM.Mohammadi TorkashvandA.Ghanbari JahromiM. (2025). Silicon nanoparticles-modulated salinity stress in sage (Salvia officinalis L.) plants through optimizing biochemical status and essential oil yield. J. Plant Nutr., 1–14. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2025.2558891
50
SinghP.KumarV.SharmaJ.SainiS.SharmaP.KumarS.et al. (2022). Silicon supplementation alleviates the salinity stress in wheat plants by enhancing the plant water status, photosynthetic pigments, proline content and antioxidant enzyme activities. Plants11, 2525. doi: 10.3390/plants11192525
51
SingletonV. L.RossiJ. A. (1965). Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic.16, 144–158. doi: 10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144
52
SmartR. E.BinghamG. E. (1974). Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant Physiol.53, 258–260. doi: 10.1104/pp.53.2.258
53
SzabadosL.SavouréA. (2010). Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci.15, 89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.009
54
ToscanoS.RomanoD.FerranteA. (2023). Molecular responses of vegetable, ornamental crops, and model plants to salinity stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24, 3190. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043190
55
UzmaJ.TallaS. K.MadamE.MamidalaP. (2022a). Assessment of salinity tolerance deploying antioxidant defense systems in Gerbera jamesonii. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia19, 243–254. doi: 10.13005/bbra/2982
56
UzmaJ.TallaS. K.MadamE.MamidalaP. (2022b). Salinity-driven oxidative stress in Gerbera jamesonii cv. Bolus. J. Appl. Hortic.24, 240–244. doi: 10.37855/jah.2022.v24i02.44
57
UzmaJ.TallaS. K.MamidalaP. (2023). Insights into the impact of spermidine in reducing salinity stress in Gerbera jamesonii. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol.11, 141–147. doi: 10.7324/JABB.2023.120550
58
VanlalruatiSinghR. K.KumarA.Lalnunmawia (2023). Differential response of chrysanthemums on osmolyte accumulation, chlorophyll content, and growth attributes under salinity stress. Indian J. Hortic.80, 190–196. doi: 10.58993/ijh/2023.80.2.10
59
WangZ.PoudyalS.KoppK.ZhangY. (2025). Response of ornamental plants to salinity: Impact on species-specific growth, visual quality, photosynthetic parameters, and ion uptake. Front. Plant Sci.16, 1611767. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1611767
60
WeatherleyP. (1950). Studies in the water relations of the cotton plant. I. The field measurement of water deficits in leaves. New Phytol.49, 81–97. Available online at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2428690 (Accessed October 06, 2025).
61
XuX.ZhouY.MiP.WangB.YuanF. (2021). Salt-tolerance screening in Limonium sinuatum varieties with different flower colors. Sci. Rep.11, 14562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93974-3
62
ZhaoS.ZhangQ.LiuM.ZhouH.MaC.WangP. (2021). Regulation of plant responses to salt stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 4609. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094609
63
ZhouH.ShiH.YangY.FengX.ChenX.XiaoF.et al. (2024). Insights into plant salt stress signaling and tolerance. J. Genet. Genomics51, 16–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2023.08.007
64
ZulfiqarF.MoosaA.FerranteA.NafeesM.DarrasA.NazirM. M.et al. (2023). Exogenous foliar application of melatonin mitigates salt induced oxidative stress and promotes growth in Gerbera jamosonii. South Afr. J. Bot.161, 678–684. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2023.08.055
Summary
Keywords
bacterial inoculation, chlorophyll stability, Gerbera jamesonii L., oxidative stress response, physiological tolerance, proline–indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), salinity stress
Citation
Karagüzel ÜÖ (2026) Integrative osmotic–antioxidant mechanisms in salinity-stressed Gerbera jamesonii treated with proline–IAA and PGPR. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1733697. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1733697
Received
27 October 2025
Revised
28 November 2025
Accepted
15 December 2025
Published
12 January 2026
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Julietta Moustaka, Aarhus University, Denmark
Reviewed by
Marzieh Ghanbari Jahromi, Islamic Azad University, Iran
Nada Nhhala, University of León, Spain
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Karagüzel.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ümmü Özgül Karagüzel, ozgul.karaguzel@erdogan.edu.tr
ORCID: Ümmü Özgül Karagüzel, orcid.org/0000-0001-9543-9136
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.