ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress
This article is part of the Research TopicMulti-Omics Strategies for Salinity and Drought Stress Mitigation in AgricultureView all 7 articles
Genome wide association studies reveal candidate genes for salt tolerance in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) at seedling stage
Provisionally accepted- 1Hainan University, Haikou, China
- 2Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- 3Mersin University, Mersin, Türkiye
- 4Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Pazar, Türkiye
- 5Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
- 6Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Faisalabad, Pakistan
- 7Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Türkiye
- 8Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Safflower productivity is hindered by soil salinity, making the identification of genetic markers essential for breeding resilient cultivars. Despite the substantial yield losses caused by salt stress, research on parental genotypes and candidate genes associated with salt tolerance remains limited. A pot experiment with 94 safflower genotypes exposed to four sodium chloride (NaCl) concentrations at the seedling stage explored salt tolerance genetics. Results showed significant variability among genotypes, NaCl treatments, and their interactions for most traits, except biological yield (BY) and fresh shoot weight (FSW). Traits showed reductions from 8% (number of leaves) to 76% (dry root weight) under NaCl stress. Broad sense heritability ranged from 17% to 97%. Correlation analysis revealed positive associations among traits, except FSW and BY. PCA grouped genotypes into three distinct clusters. Using stress tolerance indices (> 0.65) and superior performance above the population mean, three top-performing safflower genotypes were identified. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) revealed 322 marker-trait associations (MTAs), distributed as follows: 34 for BY, 25 for dry root weight (DRW), 44 for dry shoot weight (DSW), 48 for fresh root weight (FRW), 46 for FSW, 60 for number of leaves (NL), 47 for plant height (PH), and 18 for root length (RL). Gene annotation revealed key candidates influencing salinity tolerance, including PLA1, APK4, GINT1, TPLATE, UL13M, SPP2, FRF3, AT1G33770, AT5G01610, DTX50, and RAF1. These genes regulate sulfation of secondary metabolites, chloroplast development, site-specific cell wall modifications, sucrose biosynthesis, and calcium signaling, as well as the functions of hypothetical proteins or proteins with unknown roles. Validating these candidate genes, in silico transcriptomics showed significant upregulation of PLA1, SPS2, and DTX50, alongside downregulation of APK4, GINT1, TPLATE, UL13M, FRF3, AT1G33770, AT5G01610, and RAF1 under salinity. These findings highlight the top-performing genotypes for salt-tolerant cultivar development and warrant further functional studies on the identified candidate genes to gain a deeper understanding of their mechanisms under salt stress.
Keywords: candidate genes, in silico analysis, MTAS, Oilseed crop, PPI Network, salt stress
Received: 17 May 2025; Accepted: 16 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Ali, Shah, Nadeem, Altaf, Ali, Arif, Aksoy and Baloch. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Muhammad Tanveer Altaf
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.