Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Plant Sci., 06 February 2026

Sec. Plant Systems and Synthetic Biology

Volume 17 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2026.1740805

Elymus (Poaceae) as a model for climate-resilient crop design

  • 1Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 3National Field Scientific Observation and Research Station of Alpine Grassland in Nagqu, Nagqu, China

The escalating climate crisis demands that agriculture move beyond the incremental improvement of domesticated crops. We posit that the wild perennial grass genus Elymus offers a novel and powerful model for this transition. By synthesizing recent genomic, ecological, and physiological evidence, we show that the evolutionary success of these complex polyploids rests on three interconnected foundational principles: a dynamic “negotiated” allopolyploid genome balancing structural innovation with meiotic stability; a modular toolkit of molecular, microbial, and epigenetic components orchestrating stress resilience; and keystone ecosystem engineering functions enhancing soil health and carbon sequestration. Decoding this integrated “Elymus Model” provides a transformative framework that shifts the paradigm from transferring isolated traits to the principled design of crops and agroecosystems whose inherent multi-scale architecture confers productivity, sustainability, and climate resilience.

Introduction

Global agriculture faces the twin challenges of shrinking arable land and increasingly volatile climates. The integrative framework of genomics-assisted breeding (GAB 2.0) for designing future crops (Varshney et al., 2021) provides a strategic path forward, emphasizing the targeted exploitation of pre-adapted genetic variation from wild relatives to overcome yield plateaus and enhance stress resilience. The grass genus Elymus (wheatgrass), which comprises predominantly perennial species with a broad ecological amplitude across global temperate regions, provides a powerful natural model for this pursuit. While extensively studied in demanding environments such as the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), its adaptive strategies are representative of those found in congeners from saline, arid, and boreal habitats worldwide.

As genomically complex allopolyploids, Elymus species demonstrate what we term a dynamic “negotiated genome”—an ongoing state of genomic and epigenetic adjustment. This conceptualization builds upon the understanding that polyploid genomes undergo dynamic reorganization to balance evolutionary innovation with meiotic stability (Van De Peer et al., 2017). This dynamism generates the genetic and epigenetic diversity that facilitates rapid local adaptation (Li et al., 2024b). Crucially, this diversity is organized into a modular toolkit that comprises discrete, stress-responsive molecular, microbial, and epigenetic components that can be selectively recruited and assembled to counter specific challenges (Trivedi et al., 2020; Shilpa et al., 2024). Furthermore, the integrated expression of these adaptive modules often extends into keystone ecosystem functions, such as soil structure enhancement and beneficial microbiome recruitment, which in turn modify the plant’s environment.

We argue that the unique value of Elymus as a model lies in the hierarchical interplay of these three principles: the negotiated genome provides the raw material for variation, modularity governs the phenotypic assembly of this variation, and ecosystem engineering represents its functional, environmental expression. Together, they form a coherent “Elymus Model” of integrated adaptation. Decoding this model provides a novel framework for climate-resilient agriculture. Unlike approaches that focus solely on singular stress traits, this model provides a systems-level understanding. It moves the field beyond the transfer of isolated traits towards the principled design of crops and agroecosystems that are resilient through their integrated architecture. This review critically synthesizes the evidence underpinning the Elymus Model, explicitly distinguishing between well-supported mechanisms and emerging hypotheses for each pillar. We then chart the translational pathways this model unlocks for the design of future climate-resilient crops.

The negotiated genome

Polyploidy is a dynamic evolutionary process that generates genomic novelty beyond mere duplication (Van De Peer et al., 2017). In Elymus, this is evidenced by widespread chromosomal rearrangements—including species-specific translocations and inversions—following allopolyploid formation (Liu et al., 2023a). A key mechanism for stabilizing these nascent polyploids involves such structural variations (SVs), which suppress recombination to protect co-adapted gene complexes. This function aligns with chromosomal speciation mechanisms (Rieseberg, 2001) and represents a critical factor in allopolyploid genome stabilization (Comai, 2005).

The recent generation of high-quality, chromosome-scale genome assemblies—such as that of Elymus sibiricus (E. sibiricus) cultivar Gaomu No.1 (Shen et al., 2024), which achieved robust phasing of its St and H subgenomes using subgenome-specific repetitive sequences and kmers—now enables deeper investigation into subgenome coordination and epigenomic regulation. We propose the “negotiated genome” as a framework to analyze how allopolyploid genomes balance innovation with stability, and to distinguish processes supported by direct evidence from those that remain hypothetical. The role of SVs, such as species-specific reciprocal translocations (e.g., 4H/6H in E. sibiricus), in stabilizing polyploid genomes is a well-supported mechanism. In contrast, the precise molecular processes of subgenome crosstalk (e.g., via small RNAs or protein interactions) and epigenetic regulation (e.g., DNA methylation reprogramming) are active hypotheses: current supporting evidence, such as differential gene expression between subgenomes, is correlative and awaits functional validation through approaches like single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) combined with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based editing. While epigenetic regulation is broadly implicated in plant genome stability (Leech et al., 2025), direct functional demonstration of its causal role in Elymus remains elusive.

Thus, research in Elymus productively integrates established mechanisms (e.g., SV-mediated stabilization) with frontier questions about subgenome coordination. The genus is a powerful model for this because its extensively documented SVs—from the QTP to other global regions—are coupled with frequent hybridization. Deciphering these processes can provide a blueprint for harnessing genomic plasticity in crop improvement.

Structural variation as an adaptive driver

Building on the concept of the negotiated genome, SV is a major source of adaptive diversity underpinning local adaptation in Elymus. Cytogenetically confirmed intergenomic translocations provide direct evidence for this role: for example, whole-arm translocations involving chromosome 3H and translocated segments on 6St/7St are linked to cold tolerance in the northeastern Chinese accession E. sibiricus 20HSC-Z9 (Liu et al., 2024), while a newly identified 2H/5Y translocation in E. dahuricus represents a species-specific structural variant contributing to adaptation to high-altitude, cold, and arid habitats (Jiang et al., 2023). SV formation is not a historical event but an ongoing process, as demonstrated by the continuous emergence of novel translocations within hybrid swarms of E. hispidus and E. repens in Central Europe (Urfusová et al., 2024). Collectively, these examples across Eurasia—spanning Northeast Asia, the QTP, and Central Europe—confirm that adaptive SV is a widespread phenomenon across Elymus’ global range. Comparative studies further validate that chromosomal restructuring is common across the genus—often initiated by meiotic errors (Liu et al., 2022a, b)—functionally linking meiotic instability to the generation of adaptive novelty (Liu et al., 2023a).

Environmental selection plays a significant role in shaping SV landscapes. Population genetic analyses of E. breviaristatus show that isolation-by-environment can be a stronger driver of population structure than isolation-by-distance (Li et al., 2022), implying environmental selection acts on genomic SV. On an evolutionary scale, species divergence events in E. sibiricus correlate with major geological changes, such as the QTP uplift during the Himalayan Motion stage (Han et al., 2022). Environmental gradients leave direct imprints on genomic features: altitudinal clines of genome size in three Elymus species pinpoint mid-elevation zones (3400–3900 m) as hotspots of genomic variation (Chen et al., 2022). Putative adaptive signals have even been identified in organellar genomes—for example, unique haplotype composition and elevated transposon content in the mitochondrial genome of E. sibiricus are linked to high-altitude adaptation (Xiong et al., 2022b). A critical distinction must be made between correlation and mechanism. While these studies establish robust correlative links between environment and SV patterns, functional proof of how specific environmental pressures directly trigger or select for particular SVs is lacking. Establishing these causal mechanisms is a key frontier for understanding the negotiated genome framework.

To translate insights on SV into predictive power for climate change responses, research must address three key gaps. First, integrated pan-genome analyses are needed to pinpoint the molecular drivers of adaptive SVs—such as transposable element (TE) activity, which has been linked to high-altitude adaptation in E. sibiricus (Xiong et al., 2022a). Second, longitudinal monitoring of SV dynamics in natural hybrid zones across diverse ecosystems is essential. Baseline studies documenting widespread hybridization and recurrent chromosomal rearrangements in Elymus complexes (Urfusová et al., 2021) provide a foundation for this work. Finally, a deeper mechanistic understanding of how environmental gradients—including precipitation, altitude, and temperature (Li et al., 2023a, b, 2024b)—shape SV is crucial for forecasting adaptive trajectories.

Subgenome dynamics and genomic stabilization mechanisms

The stability of newly formed polyploid genomes is not automatic but is maintained through a dynamic equilibrium between genetic diversification and stabilization. This equilibrium is underpinned by molecular buffering systems that preserve genomic integrity. For example, genomic analyses in polyploid wheat show that centromeres restructure via distinct paths: the A subgenome experiences recurrent retrotransposon invasions, while the D subgenome undergoes gradual epigenetic expansion of CENH3 domains, collectively supporting centromeric rewiring (Huang et al., 2025). Nevertheless, direct functional evidence establishing causality in plants remains limited. Concurrently, comparative genomic assemblies reveal landscapes where lineage-specific retrotransposon proliferation co-occurs with SVs and subgenome divergence, a configuration that has been implicated in post-polyploid genomic stabilization (Shen et al., 2024). Thus, SVs provide raw material for adaptation, whereas mechanisms ensuring centromere function and modulated TE activity may buffer against excessive instability.

The physiological consequence of this balance is evident in traits like fertility. In E. nutans, high genome-wide heterozygosity correlates strongly with reduced fertility—this is particularly associated with SVs such as chromosomal rearrangements and pairing abnormalities in the more dynamic St and H subgenomes (Liu et al., 2022a, b). Another widespread outcome is subgenome dominance, a well-documented phenomenon in allopolyploids where one ancestral genome contributes disproportionately to the transcriptome. Critically, similar patterns of dominance and structural diversification are observed in diverse allopolyploids: wheat exhibits subgenome-specific centromere restructuring and dominance in chromosomal stability (Zhao et al., 2023), while cotton shows asymmetric expression and structural differentiation between A and D subgenomes (Rahman et al., 2021), suggesting common evolutionary principles.

However, the causal regulatory mechanisms orchestrating this balance remain incompletely understood. Key unresolved questions include how genetic differentiation among St/H subgenomes coordinates with adaptive traits (e.g., stress tolerance, fertility) in polyploid Elymus species, and the specific role of epigenetic regulation—a factor inferred to be critical for mediating environmental adaptation and genomic stability, yet its mechanistic links to observed genetic variation remain uncharacterized (Li et al., 2024b; Xiong et al., 2024a). Advancing this understanding requires moving from these correlative observations to causal inference. Future work should employ spatiotemporal functional genomics approaches such as scRNA-seq to dissect subgenome-specific expression dynamics, and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) to map chromatin states across diverse environmental conditions. These approaches must be coupled with functional validation, for example, using CRISPR-based editing to perturb specific candidates like subgenome-specific transcription factors or TE families linked to adaptation. Ultimately, integrating epigenomic analyses will be essential to delineate how these epigenetic marks directly mediate St/H subgenome dynamics and long-term genomic stabilization in Elymus.

Translating genomic dynamics into crop breeding

The study of dynamic subgenome interactions in polyploid plants provides a framework for addressing complex trait architecture, such as the “missing heritability” problem in crop breeding. Insights from these systems suggest several concrete translational strategies, grounded in empirical studies, which are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Breeding strategies informed by the Elymus negotiated genome.

Bridging heritability gaps. Wild relatives are key reservoirs of adaptive genetic variation. Successful examples in E. sibiricus include the introgression of a 3St chromosome into wheat via disomic addition lines, conferring robust leaf rust resistance at the adult stage (Motsnyi et al., 2024), and the identification of the elite cold-tolerant germplasm 20HSC-Z9 with 100% green-up rate after overwintering at -30°C (Liu et al., 2024). Systematic phenotyping under abiotic stresses can pinpoint further sources of resilience, such as drought tolerance in the Central Asian species E. borianus and E. russelli—these species exhibit enhanced proline accumulation and antioxidant enzyme activity under water deficit (Khan et al., 2022). Together, these cases validate the feasibility of a practical approach: utilizing the Elymus gene pool for adaptive traits through targeted phenotyping and chromosome-mediated introgression.

Enabling precision germplasm management. High-quality chromosome-scale reference genomes of E. sibiricus (Shen et al., 2024) and molecular characterization of wheat-E. sibiricus introgression lines (Motsnyi et al., 2024), combined with genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) fingerprinting via Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR (KASP) technology (Li et al., 2025b), empower gene discovery and facilitate the assembly of an optimized core collection that captures maximal adaptive diversity in E. sibiricus. This molecular information critically informs the conservation of endemic Elymus taxa including the South American endemic E. magellanicus (studied using cultivated accessions in China) (Wu et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2023b) and the Chinese endemic E. breviaristatus complex (Tan et al., 2022) as well as the delineation and protection of adaptive hotspots such as the Mekong-Salween Divide in QTP Elymus populations (Li et al., 2024b) and genetic structuring of Elymus sensu stricto on a global scale (Leo et al., 2025).

Refining predictive breeding models. For instance, in E. sibiricus, this process involves elucidating the genetic architecture and integrating core elements into genomic selection (GS) models to prioritize functional variants: genome-wide association studies (GWAS)-identified hub genes (e.g., TOPLESS) that regulate auxin/jasmonic acid (JA) signaling and plant height (Zhang et al., 2022b), critical regulatory networks (e.g., TCP transcription factors) linked to tillering capacity and stress-adaptive phenotypes (Liu et al., 2025), and key agronomic traits (e.g., spike architecture traits including spike weight and grain density) (Liu et al., 2022c). This integrated strategy enhances the predictive accuracy for target traits, advancing predictive breeding of high-yield and stress-tolerant Elymus cultivars.

Accelerating de novo trait assembly. Natural hybrid zones serve as natural sources of novel trait combinations, generating diverse genotypes via successive introgression and polyploidization (Urfusová et al., 2024). Similarly, synthetic wide hybrids serve as valuable platforms for trait innovation. For instance, in Russia, synthetic wheatgrass-E. farctus hybrids (derived from ×Trititrigia cziczinii × E. farctus crossed with the wheat-wheatgrass hybrid w107) utilize leaf micromorphological traits (e.g., silicified wavy-walled long cells, shield-shaped prickles) as selectable markers to track genomic introgression, facilitating the identification of desirable wild alleles (e.g., E. farctus-derived salt tolerance) while minimizing linkage drag of undesirable traits (Babosha et al., 2024). Together, these natural and synthetic hybrid systems streamline the assembly of de novo traits by leveraging genetic novelty from hybridization and polyploidization, accelerating the development of improved cultivars.

Remaining challenges and future research priorities. Significant hurdles persist, including linkage drag during introgression and limited accuracy of GS models that overlook SVs and epigenetic effects. Future research should focus on three key areas: first, targeted introgression strategies combining precise tools like CRISPR with insights into meiotic stability (Liu et al., 2022b) to enhance allele transfer efficiency; second, next-generation GS models integrating pan-genome data (Bayer et al., 2020), epigenetic markers (Amin et al., 2025), and species-specific regulatory networks (Zhang et al., 2022b; Liu et al., 2025); finally, advanced predictive frameworks synthesizing environmental associations (Xiong et al., 2022a; Li et al., 2023b) and hybrid zone dynamics (Urfusová et al., 2024) to guide resilient crop genotype design.

A modular toolkit for stress resilience

Plant resilience to environmental stress is governed by a complex, modular system of signaling pathways and regulatory components (Zhu, 2016). Species of Elymus, which thrive in extreme habitats like the QTP, serve as a robust model for this modularity. Their adaptation is underpinned by the integrated function of these discrete modules. At the whole-plant level, this is illustrated by wild E. nutans populations in Tibet, where environmental gradients shape phenotypic variation and seed element profiles (Long et al., 2025). Decoding this modular architecture in Elymus provides a valuable blueprint for engineering climate-resilient crops. Core elements of this system include conserved pathways such as the C-repeat binding factor (CBF) regulon (Kopeć et al., 2022), symbiotic microbial networks (Zhu et al., 2022), and epigenetic regulators (Zhang and Zhu, 2025), which operate both independently and in coordination.

Core molecular pathways

The resilience of Elymus species relies on a series of discrete molecular modules, each adapted to particular environmental challenges, as seen in the following key pathways: In response to cold, melatonin cooperates with the transcription factor WRKY11 to enhance antioxidant defense (Zhuoma et al., 2024). Drought triggers distinct molecular strategies across species. For E. sibiricus, this involves an integrated drought-response program: ABA signaling is turned on through up-regulation of EsSnRK2, EsLRK10, and EsCIPK5; the cuticle is reinforced by EsCER1-dependent synthesis of very-long-chain alkanes; and root suberin deposition is increased via induction of CYP86A1 and KCS20 (Liu et al., 2022d; An et al., 2024). In E. nutans, drought induces ABA accumulation, an early signaling event that likely primes subsequent adaptive pathways (Long et al., 2024). When exposed to combined cold and drought stress, the CBF regulon acts as a master transcriptional regulator, redirecting carbon toward osmoprotectants such as soluble sugars and proline (Liu et al., 2023b).

Salt tolerance in Elymus depends on specialized molecular programs. Tolerant E. sibiricus accessions regulate ion transporters to maintain a low Na+/K+ ratio, upregulate proline synthesis genes for water retention, and enhance antioxidant enzyme expression to limit electrolyte leakage (Chen et al., 2023a). In E. nutans, the molecular response to salt is distinct from its drought adaptation; salt stress activates ion-balance pathways, reflecting distinct stress-specific regulatory networks (Long et al., 2023). Heavy-metal detoxification in Elymus involves a dual strategy: antioxidant systems are transcriptionally activated alongside the balanced expression of anti-apoptotic (BI-1, UCP1) and pro-apoptotic (VPE, MYB391) genes to modulate programmed cell death. In this process, reactive oxygen species act as a critical signal (Hu et al., 2023; Han et al., 2024). A consistent pattern emerging from these studies is a dose-dependent transcriptional shift: growth-related genes (e.g., for photosynthetic pigments) are favored under mild stress, while defense pathways dominate under severe stress (Hu et al., 2023).

Beyond these specialized stress-specific modules, the resilience of Elymus also relies on higher-order regulatory networks that integrate signals across different stress modules. This integration occurs through central hubs. For instance, the transcription factor EsiERF285 fine-tunes drought and heat tolerance by coordinating the aforementioned ABA and antioxidant signaling pathways (Xiong et al., 2024b). Multi-omics studies identify other integrators, such as SAPK3, which sequentially activates hormone pathways under salt stress, thereby balancing growth and defense (De et al., 2024). Such integrated networks further influence life-history traits and resource allocation, directing metabolic flux toward synthesis of protective compounds like vitexin and allantoin under stress (Yu et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2024a).

Modularity also applies to developmental programs, not just acute stress responses: Flowering time in E. sibiricus is controlled by modular networks that integrate environmental signals such as drought and salinity (Zheng et al., 2022). Similarly, during seed development, co-expression networks and hub genes (e.g., NAC, AP2/ERF) regulate starch metabolism (Zheng et al., 2024), effectively embedding resilience into the plant’s lifecycle.

Key future challenges include deciphering how these modules interact under combined stresses and evaluating the risks of engineering core trade-offs. Future research should characterize inter-module connectivity using multi-omics approaches and develop context-sensitive genetic switches—for example, via CRISPR—to activate specific adaptive modules only when needed. Understanding these dynamics, including the dose-dependent and developmental regulation outlined above, will be crucial for designing resilient crops.

The synergistic microbial module

The rhizosphere microbiome is integral to the stress resilience of Elymus species, mediating key beneficial interactions. For example, colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) primes plant defense via JA signaling and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) induction (Zhang et al., 2022a) and reprograms host metabolism under stress, upregulating flavonoid and lipid biosynthesis to enhance cold resistance (Zhang et al., 2023). Moreover, AMF reduces arsenic (As) uptake and translocation, thereby improving arsenic sequestration in E. sibiricus (Gatasheh et al., 2024). Similarly, fungal endophytes like Epichloë offer direct chemical defense through alkaloids (Du et al., 2024) and enhance cadmium (Cd) tolerance in E. dahuricus by bolstering antioxidant capacity and sustaining growth (Shi et al., 2024).

Notably, the assembly and function of this beneficial microbiome are themselves modulated by environmental factors. In E. nutans silage, for example, altitudinal gradients restructure the microbial community—selecting for high-elevation adapted lactic acid bacteria (e.g., Lactiplantibacillus, Pediococcus) while improving fermentation quality (Li et al., 2024a; Su et al., 2024).

Beyond these microbial synergies, the resilience toolkit of Elymus extends to perceiving chemical cues from its plant neighbors. Exposure to allelochemicals from Artemisia baimaensis (via litter leachates or VOCs) primes E. nutans, activating its antioxidant enzyme systems (e.g., SOD, POD, APX) and osmotic adjustment mechanisms (e.g., soluble sugar, proline accumulation) (Yang et al., 2023). This indicates that interplant signaling can be a supplementary layer of resilience.

To harness this synergistic potential for practical agroecological use, key challenges must be addressed. These include ensuring the functional stability of introduced microbial consortia across heterogeneous soil environments and understanding their compatibility with the plant’s endogenous signaling networks. Future efforts should therefore focus on two complementary strategies: first, the rational design of stable, environment-adapted synthetic microbial consortia (SMCs) that combine complementary taxa like AMF and Epichloë; and second, the targeted engineering of root exudate profiles (e.g., via CRISPR/Cas) to modulate the rhizosphere microbiome. Together, these approaches aim to purposefully strengthen this external biological defense barrier against abiotic stress.

The epigenetic regulatory layer

Epigenetic mechanisms, such as dynamic DNA methylation, serve as critical fine-tuners of modular stress responses, underpinning phenotypic plasticity and the establishment of stress memory (Zhu et al., 2025). In plants, this regulation is bidirectional; for instance, active demethylation at defense gene loci can release transcriptional repression to potentiate immunity (Zhu et al., 2025), while precise methylation patterns are indispensable for processes like seed development (Frost et al., 2024). These epigenetic states often exert their phenotypic effects by governing downstream transcriptional regulators. A compelling illustration in Elymus is the targeted editing of the transcription factor EnTCP4 in E. nutans (Li et al., 2025a). Its disruption concurrently delayed flowering and enhanced drought tolerance—the latter linked to increased trichome density and superior water retention. This example underscores how modifying central regulatory nodes can rebalance the trade-offs between development and stress resilience, offering a strategic pathway for de novo domestication and molecular design breeding.

To advance from correlation to mechanistic understanding and application, future work should focus on three aims: establishing causal links via targeted epigenetic editing tools such as dCas9-effector fusions (deactivated Cas9 fused with epigenetic modifier domains) (Jogam et al., 2022); developing predictive panels of epigenetic markers to evaluate adaptive potential (Spadafora, 2023); and validating combined priming strategies under realistic field conditions.

Research on Elymus species converges on a modular view of stress resilience, wherein core molecular pathways, symbiotic microbial functions, and epigenetic regulation constitute a toolkit of complementary mechanisms. This understanding not only elucidates the architecture of adaptation but also provides an actionable framework for trait stacking in crop improvement. Thus, the path forward lies in the predictive assembly of these modules, marking a shift from protecting crops against stress to engineering inherent resilience.

Elymus as an ecosystem engineer

Beyond its value as a genetic resource, Elymus also functions as an ecosystem engineer, contributing to sustainable agroecosystems through carbon sequestration, soil restoration, microbiome-mediated services, and invasive species suppression. The synergy between these multifunctional traits with technologies like microbiome engineering and remote sensing (Wang et al., 2024) further enhances its utility for rehabilitating degraded lands.

Engineering ecosystem services

A central service provided by Elymus is the improvement of soil structure and stability. For instance, when grown with biochar amendments, Elymus grasses significantly boost soil organic carbon content—highest by 222% compared to controls—thereby reinforcing soil health and carbon sequestration potential (Ashraf and Chen, 2023). In erosion control, E. tangutorum works synergistically with Poa pratensis to enhance litter interception and rainfall infiltration, reducing soil erosion by 65% on slopes of the QTP (Liu et al., 2022e).

Beyond soil improvements, its performance can be enhanced through targeted management. Under precision interventions, the co-application of copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) and AMF alleviates As stress in E. sibiricus by reducing As uptake and strengthening antioxidant enzyme activity (Gatasheh et al., 2024). Similarly, nano-Fe3O4 application mitigates Cd toxicity by regulating anti-apoptotic genes and suppressing pro-apoptotic genes, thereby sustaining plant biomass (Han et al., 2024).

Elymus also actively shapes biotic communities and suppresses stressors. Reseeding of E. nutans in the alpine meadows of eastern QTP modifies habitat structure, suppressing populations of the plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) (Wei et al., 2022). Additionally, fungal endophytes from European wild E. repens exhibit biocontrol activity against plant pathogens including Fusarium culmorum and Pyrenophora teres, adding another layer of defense against biotic threats (Høyer et al., 2022). Its competitive advantage in light capture enables E. canadensis and E. virginicus to suppress the invasive common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) in the deciduous forest understories of Minnesota, USA, further stabilizing plant community composition (Schuster et al., 2025).

However, translating these benefits into reliable, large-scale applications faces challenges. These include ensuring the long-term stability of managed soils and navigating ecological trade-offs. For instance, while legume-Elymus mixtures improve soil fertility, they may increase the abundance of soil pathogenic fungi under warming conditions in field experiments (Zhong et al., 2023). Monocultures risk autotoxicity, as demonstrated in E. sibiricus, where rhizosphere soil extracts inhibit the growth of conspecific seedlings in laboratory assays (Yang et al., 2022). Additionally, allelopathic interference from invasive species, such as the inhibition of E. nutans germination and growth by the toxic grass Achnatherum inebrians, as observed in greenhouse studies (Zhang et al., 2024b), presents another concern.

Engineering the rhizosphere microbiome

In Elymus species, the rhizosphere microbiome constitutes a stable, functionally integrated consortium that underpins host adaptation and ecosystem resilience. This consortium exhibits multigenerational stability; for instance, in E. nutans, key functional groups like ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (e.g., Nitrosospira multiformis, Nitrosospira sp. Nsp17) are vertically transmitted, thereby ensuring the persistence of nitrogen (N)-cycling functions (Liang and Bowatte, 2022). In E. dahuricus, the host plant actively modulates its rhizosphere consortium through root exudates and associated organic matter, selectively enriching microbes that enhance both soil fertility and plant stress tolerance (Hao et al., 2023).

The rhizosphere system of Elymus exhibits strong functional synergy among its microbial partners. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), such as Serratia and Bacillus strains, enhance root architecture and nutrient uptake under cold stress (Ran et al., 2025). Meanwhile, AMF like Funneliformis mosseae and Rhizophagus irregularis contribute to metal sequestration, cold tolerance, and the systemic priming of plant defenses (Zhang et al., 2022a, 2023; Gatasheh et al., 2024). A notable example of this synergy is seen in E. nutans, where AMF colonization establishes a positive feedback loop: improved P and N uptake boosts plant biomass, which in turn reinforces a systemically primed defense against herbivores like Locusta migratoria through enhanced JA signaling and the production of insect-deterrent volatiles (Zhang et al., 2022a).

To harness this functional synergy for agricultural applications, a central challenge lies in translating this knowledge into robust practices, particularly in maintaining the field stability of SMCs (Sharma and Araujo, 2025) and mitigating potential ecological risks, such as the unintended enrichment of pathogens in managed systems (Zhong et al., 2023). Future work should aim to design context-specific SMCs by leveraging metagenomic data and predictive modeling, and concurrently establish robust ecological risk assessment frameworks to guide the responsible deployment and monitoring of engineered microbiomes.

Precision ecosystem management

Precision management of Elymus-based ecosystems begins with optimized sowing strategies. Spatial arrangement is a key factor: cross-row monoculture planting of E. nutans increases yield by reducing intraspecific competition, while mixtures with legumes such as Onobrychis viciifolia enhance overall community biomass and improve lodging resistance compared to monocultures (Ren et al., 2023). Designing sowing patterns including square-sowing to balance these inter- and intraspecific interactions is therefore essential for stable productivity (Ren et al., 2025).

Subsequent management interventions, such as mowing, can precisely direct plant development. In Elymus species, mowing at a defined intensity and timing, for instance moderate mowing at the jointing stage, promotes biomass allocation to roots and stimulates compensatory growth, with root biomass serving as a major predictor of regrowth capacity (Yang et al., 2025).

These principles can be extended through monitoring and targeted control technologies. For beneficial Elymus species in China, this includes using species distribution models to identify optimal planting areas in the northwest and western mountainous regions (Lu et al., 2025a). It also involves targeted chemical approaches—such as combining broad-leaved grass inhibitors with nitrogen fertilization—to boost seed yield and suppress weeds in E. nutans stands on the QTP (Lu et al., 2025b).

For E. repens, however, a differentiated management strategy is needed, especially in Northern Europe. Management planning must first account for its invasive potential—a critical factor to consider in introduction plans (Ringselle et al., 2023). For its control, sustainable non-chemical methods like low-energy lasers or electrical treatments are practical options (Andreasen et al., 2024; Ringselle et al., 2025). Additionally, understanding its dose-dependent allelopathy can refine control strategies: studies in Ukraine show that low concentrations of its rhizome extracts stimulate wheat growth, while high concentrations inhibit it (Okrushko, 2022).

Translating ecological research into practice involves addressing scale-up challenges. For instance, 3D-printed Elymus experimental surrogates—which mimic key biomechanical traits—address the problems of seasonal variability in plant traits and sample standardization in field studies, serving as a critical bridge between controlled experiments and real-world application (Keimer et al., 2024). However, the economic feasibility of deploying such tools at the field scale remains a major hurdle. Furthermore, management practices such as mowing and fertilization require careful balancing of short-term yield against long-term stand persistence—excessive mowing or fertilization can undermine persistence, whereas optimized regimes (e.g., moderate mowing at the jointing stage, balanced nutrient input) support sustained productivity (Wu et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2025). Precision nutrient management, using site-adapted optimized nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium (N-P-K) formulations, is therefore essential to maximize both economic returns and ecological sustainability (Song et al., 2025).

Future efforts should focus on integrating these technological approaches into cohesive farm management systems. Key implementation pathways include: developing Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled autonomous equipment capable of synchronized operations such as weeding and seeding, supported by real-time mechanical and environmental sensing (Rajak et al., 2023); establishing integrated monitoring platforms that combine unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based multispectral remote sensing for high-throughput disease phenotyping and yield prediction (Chivasa et al., 2021) with pervasive IoT sensor networks for real-time surveillance of soil conditions, microclimate, and pest dynamics; and applying predictive modeling tools to dynamically optimize target species productivity and environmental sustainability through data synthesis and intelligent decision support.

Building on Elymus’ role as an ecosystem engineer, an integrated framework can be designed to balance productivity with resilience. This approach synthesizes precision agronomy, rhizosphere microbiome engineering, and smart monitoring technologies (e.g., IoT and UAV-based remote sensing). It enables applications such as precision restoration units—combining selected seeds, tailored microbial consortia, and amended growth substrates—and adaptive management systems driven by real-time sensor data. Implementing these tools at scale, however, requires overcoming key challenges: ensuring cost-effectiveness, maintaining long-term soil and microbiome stability, and managing ecological risks such as species trade-offs or autotoxicity.

Conclusion

The Elymus system offers a comprehensive framework for understanding and engineering climate-resilient plants—what we term the Elymus Model. See Figure 1 for a visual synthesis of this framework, which integrates three evolutionarily aligned pillars: (1) a dynamically negotiated allopolyploid genome that balances structural innovation with meiotic stability; (2) a modular toolkit comprising molecular, microbial, and epigenetic components, which can be combined to counter specific stresses; and (3) keystone ecosystem functions that extend adaptive benefits from individual plants to the landscape scale.

Figure 1
Diagram illustrating the Elymus model's framework for phenotypic assembly and expression through genetic and epigenetic materials. It emphasizes negotiated genome processes and a modular toolkit for assembling traits. The model supports ecosystem services like carbon health and erosion control, aiming at climate-resilient crops, sustainable agroecosystems, and land restoration. The enabling technology platform involves gene editing, multi-omics, microbiome engineering, and precision management technologies.

Figure 1. Conceptual framework of the Elymus Model for climate-resilient crop and agroecosystem design. The model is derived from Elymus (central left), a perennial allopolyploid grass that thrives in extreme habitats including the QTP, following a left-to-right translational flow. Its adaptive success rests on three core interconnected principles: a dynamically negotiated allopolyploid genome (generating diversity through SV, subgenome dynamics, and epigenetic reprogramming), a modular toolkit (assembling molecular, microbial, and epigenetic components for specific stresses), and ecosystem engineering (delivering landscape-level services including carbon sequestration, erosion control, and microbiome-mediated nutrient cycling). These principles are enabled by a cross-cutting technology platform (bottom) that includes gene editing, multi-omics, microbiome engineering, precision sensing, and predictive modeling. The integrated framework guides the development of climate-resilient crops and the restoration of degraded lands toward sustainable, multifunctional agroecosystems (central right).

A key distinction between the Elymus Model and adaptation strategies in other plant systems lies in its deeply integrated, multi-scale resilience. For instance, while suberin deposition is a common drought response across plants, Elymus species like E. sibiricus coordinate suberin biosynthesis through a network of subgenome-tuned regulators (e.g., EsCER1, CYP86A1, KCS20) (Liu et al., 2022d; An et al., 2024). This reflects a genome-level capacity—rooted in subgenome negotiation—to fine-tune universal adaptive traits, setting it apart from simpler stress response pathways in other taxa like Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa (Zhu, 2016). Similarly, its modular stress toolkit unites hormone signaling, microbiome recruitment, and epigenetic memory as a coordinated system, rather than a collection of isolated pathways.

By unpacking how polyploidy, modularity, and ecosystem engineering interact in Elymus, this model provides more than a crop improvement blueprint. It offers a framework for designing inherently adaptive agroecosystems. Insights from Elymus underscore that sustainable agricultural innovation can be powerfully guided by evolutionary strategy—moving beyond mere trait transfer toward the principled design of resilient crops and landscapes.

Future perspectives

The Elymus Model establishes a concrete framework to guide future research and translation. Future work should focus on bridging key knowledge gaps and converting systemic insights into practical applications.

Resolving mechanistic uncertainties. A primary challenge is to move from correlation to causation across the model’s pillars. For the negotiated genome, functional validation is needed to show how subgenome communication and epigenetic reprogramming directly orchestrate adaptation—going beyond the well-documented role of SV. Within the modular toolkit, research must elucidate the connections between molecular, microbial, and epigenetic components, especially under concurrent stresses. Expanding phylogenomic studies to underrepresented Elymus species globally will clarify how hybridization and polyploidization histories shape these adaptive architectures.

Translating systemic insights into breeding and management. The model’s value lies in its application. In breeding, this requires next-generation prediction models that integrate pan-genomic structural variants, epigenetic marks, and regulatory network data to capture complex resilience traits. For agroecosystem design, the principles of modularity and ecosystem engineering call for practical tools—such as decision-support frameworks for deploying Elymus-based mixtures in degraded lands (e.g., site-specific seed-ratio recommendations or matched microbial consortia) or for engineering root-exudate profiles to steer beneficial microbiomes. Crucially, the deployment of novel genotypes or synthetic microbial consortia must be coupled with rigorous, long-term ecological risk assessment to monitor outcomes such as soil pathogen dynamics or community stability.

Addressing scalability and trade-offs. Implementing the model at scale faces practical hurdles: the cost and robustness of precision-management technologies, the persistence of engineered traits or microbiomes in variable field environments, and the management of ecological trade-offs (e.g., between productivity and stand persistence, or between species in mixtures). Overcoming these barriers requires not only technical innovation but also a shift in agroecosystem design philosophy—from optimizing single crops to managing resilient, multifunctional systems.

In summary, Elymus transcends its role as a model genus; it provides an evolutionary blueprint for rethinking agricultural resilience. By integrating its principles with advances in genetics, microbiology, and precision ecology, we can develop agricultural systems that are inherently more adaptive and sustainable. The path forward demands a concerted effort to ground this blueprint in mechanistic understanding and to test its application in the complex reality of working landscapes.

Author contributions

SY: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. TD: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Native Grass Seed Multiplication Technology R&D and Demonstration Project of Sa’gya County (Grant No. GZFCG2024 -20034), the Regional Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Project of Shigatse Municipal Government (QYXTZX-RKZ2025-03-1), the Regional Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Project of Science and Technology Bureau of Ali Prefecture (QYXTZX-AL2024-05) and Major Special Project of the Science and Technology Bureau of Xizang Autonomous Region (XZ202502ZY0009).

Acknowledgments

We thank colleagues and students from the Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research and Tibet University for their insightful discussions.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. For language polishing, grammar checking, and improving the readability of the manuscript. The authors thoroughly reviewed, revised, and take full responsibility for all the scientific content, data interpretation, and conclusions presented in this work.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Amin, A., Zaman, W., and Park, S. (2025). Harnessing multi-omics and predictive modeling for climate-resilient crop breeding: from genomes to fields. Genes 16, 809. doi: 10.3390/genes16070809

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

An, Y., Wang, Q., Cui, Y., Liu, X., Wang, P., Zhou, Y., et al. (2024). Comparative physiological and transcriptomic analyses reveal genotype specific response to drought stress in Siberian wildrye (Elymus sibiricus). Sci. Rep. 14, 21060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71847-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Andreasen, C., Vlassi, E., and Salehan, N. (2024). Laser weeding: opportunities and challenges for couch grass (Elymus repens (L.) Gould) control. Sci. Rep. 14, 11173. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61742-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ashraf, F. and Chen, Y. (2023). Synergistic effects of biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on enhancing Elymus elymoides growth in saline coastal soil. Pak. J. Bot. 55, 119–126. doi: 10.30848/PJB2023-SI(14

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Babosha, A. V., Loshakova, P. O., Pogost, A. A., Gevorkyan, M. M., Alenicheva, A. D., Komarova, G. I., et al. (2024). Leaf surface micromorphology in hybrids of wheat and ×Trititrigia × Elymus farctus. Agronomy 14, 2490. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14112490

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bayer, P. E., Golicz, A. A., Scheben, A., Batley, J., and Edwards, D. (2020). Plant pan-genomes are the new reference. Nat. Plants 6, 914–920. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0733-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, S., Feng, J., Xiong, Y., Xiong, Y., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., et al. (2023a). Evaluation and Screening of Wild Elymus sibiricus L. Germplasm Resources under Salt Stress. Agronomy 13, 2675. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13112675

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, X., Wu, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, M., You, J., and Ru, Z. (2023b). Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Elymus magellanicus (É.Desv.) Á.Löve (Poaceae, Pooideae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 8, 795–798. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2023.2238931

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Z., Guan, Y., Han, M., Guo, Y., Zhang, J., Guo, Z., et al. (2022). Altitudinal patterns in adaptive evolution of genome size and inter-genome hybridization between three Elymus species from the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.923967

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chivasa, W., Mutanga, O., and Burgueño, J. (2021). UAV-based high-throughput phenotyping to increase prediction and selection accuracy in maize varieties under artificial MSV inoculation. Comput. Electron. Agric. 184, 106128. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106128

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Comai, L. (2005). The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 836–846. doi: 10.1038/nrg1711

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

De, Y., Yan, W., Gao, F., and Mu, H. (2024). Unraveling the signaling pathways of phytohormones underlying salt tolerance in Elymus sibiricus: A transcriptomic and metabolomic approach. Genomics 116, 110893. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2024.110893

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Du, M., Wang, T., Li, C., and Chen, T. (2024). Discovery and characterization of Epichloë Fungal endophytes from Elymus spp. in northwest China. Microorganisms 12, 1497. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12071497

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Frost, J. M., Rhee, J. H., and Choi, Y. (2024). Dynamics of DNA methylation and its impact on plant embryogenesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 81, 102593. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2024.102593

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gatasheh, M. K., Shah, A. A., Kaleem, M., Usman, S., and Shaffique, S. (2024). Application of CuNPs and AMF alleviates arsenic stress by encompassing reduced arsenic uptake through metabolomics and ionomics alterations in Elymus sibiricus. BMC Plant Biol. 24, 667. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05359-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, M., Chen, Z., Sun, G., Feng, Y., Guo, Y., Bai, S., et al. (2024). Nano-Fe3O4: Enhancing the tolerance of Elymus nutans to Cd stress through regulating programmed cell death. Environ. pollut. 360, 124711. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124711

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, M., Zhang, J., Li, D., Sun, S., Zhang, C., Zhang, C., et al. (2022). Phylogeographical pattern and population evolution history of indigenous Elymus sibiricus L. on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.882601

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hao, C., Du, P., Ren, J., Hu, L., and Zhang, Z. (2023). Halophyte Elymus dahuricus colonization regulates microbial community succession by mediating saline-alkaline and biogenic organic matter in bauxite residue. Sci. Total Environ. 905, 167140. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167140

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Høyer, A. K., Jørgensen, H. J. L., Hodkinson, T. R., and Jensen, B. (2022). Fungal Endophytes Isolated from Elymus repens, a Wild Relative of Barley, Have Potential for Biological Control of Fusarium culmorum and Pyrenophora teres in Barley. Pathogens. 11, 1097. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11101097

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, Y., Wang, H., Jia, H., Peng, M., Zhu, T., Liu, Y., et al. (2023). Effects of Cd treatment on morphology, chlorophyll content and antioxidant enzyme activity of Elymus nutans Griseb., a native plant in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Plant Signal. Behav. 18, 2187561. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2023.2187561

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, C., Yi, C., Lai, J., Ling, H., et al. (2025). Distinct evolutionary trajectories of subgenomic centromeres in polyploid wheat. Genome Biol. 26, 271. doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03759-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, C., Liu, X., Yang, Z., and Li, G. (2023). Chromosome rearrangement in Elymus dahuricus revealed by ND-FISH and oligo-FISH painting. Plants 12, 3268. doi: 10.3390/plants12183268

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jogam, P., Sandhya, D., Alok, A., Peddaboina, V., Allini, V. R., and Zhang, B. (2022). A review on CRISPR/Cas-based epigenetic regulation in plants. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 219, 1261–1271. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.08.182

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keimer, K., Kind, F., Prüter, I., Kosmalla, V., Lojek, O., Schürenkamp, D., et al. (2024). From seasonal field study to surrogate modeling: Investigating the biomechanical dynamics of Elymus sp.in salt marshes. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 22, 416–436. doi: 10.1002/lom3.10616

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Khan, A., Ali, A., Ullah, Z., Ali, I., Kaushik, P., AlYemeni, M. N., et al. (2022). Exploiting the drought tolerance of wild Elymus species for bread wheat improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.982844

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kopeć, P., Rapacz, M., and Arora, R. (2022). Post-translational activation of CBF for inducing freezing tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 27, 415–417. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2022.01.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Leech, D., Previtera, D. A., Zhang, Y., Botella, J. R., and Crisp, P. A. (2025). Precision plant epigenome editing: what, how, and why. Trends Plant Sci., S1360138525002365. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2025.08.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Leo, J., Bengtsson, T., Morales, A., Carlsson, A. S., and Von Bothmer, R. (2025). Genetic structure analyses reveal multiple origins of Elymus sensu stricto (Poaceae). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 72, 167–185. doi: 10.1007/s10722-024-01944-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, F., Jia, M., Chen, H., Chen, M., Su, R., Usman, S., et al. (2024a). Responses of microbial community composition and CAZymes encoding gene enrichment in ensiled Elymus nutans to altitudinal gradients in alpine region. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 90, e00986–e00924. doi: 10.1128/aem.00986-24

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Li, X., Zhang, C., Zhou, Q., and Chen, S. (2024b). Phylogeographic analysis reveals extensive genetic variation of native grass Elymus nutans (Poaceae) on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Front. Plant Sci. 15. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1349641

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Ma, S., Jiang, K., Zhang, C., Liu, W., and Chen, S. (2022). Drivers of population divergence and genetic variation in Elymus breviaristatus (Keng) Keng f. (Poaceae: Triticeae), an endemic perennial herb of the Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.1068739

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, C., Peng, X., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Pedro, G.-C., Fu, C., et al. (2025a). Establishment of Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation and CRISPR/Cas9-guided gene editing in Elymus nutans. J. Plant Physiol. 310, 154513. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2025.154513

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X., Song, D., Li, M., Li, D., You, M., Peng, Y., et al. (2025b). An initial exploration of core collection construction and DNA fingerprinting in Elymus sibiricus L. using SNP markers. Front. Plant Sci. 16. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1534085

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Tian, H., Ji, W., Zhang, C., and Chen, S. (2023a). Inflorescence trait diversity and genotypic differentiation as influenced by the environment in Elymus nutans Griseb. from Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Agronomy 13, 1004. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13041004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Zhang, C., Mipam, T. D., Zhou, Q., and Chen, S. (2023b). Effects of climatic change on phylogeography and ecological niche of the endemic herb Elymus breviaristatus on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Plants 12, 3326. doi: 10.3390/plants12183326

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liang, D. and Bowatte, S. (2022). Seed endophytic ammonia oxidizing bacteria in Elymus nutans transmit to offspring plants and contribute to nitrification in the root zone. Front. Microbiol. 13. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1036897

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, B., Chen, J., Yang, Y., Shen, W., Guo, J., and Dou, Q. (2023a). Single-gene FISH maps and major chromosomal rearrangements in Elymus sibiricus and E. nutans. BMC Plant Biol. 23, 98. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04110-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Ding, J., Wu, C., Song, W., Zhao, X., Zhao, H., et al. (2024). Characterization of a natural accession of Elymus sibiricus with in situ hybridization and agronomic evaluation. Plants 14, 75. doi: 10.3390/plants14010075

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, M., Liu, W., Zhang, Y., Yang, W., Qi, H., Liang, G., et al. (2022c). Contribution of spike type and characteristics to the seed yield of Elymus sibiricus L. on Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Braz. J. Bot. 45, 971–986. doi: 10.1007/s40415-022-00813-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, T., Peng, J., Dong, Z., Liu, Y., Wu, J., Xiong, Y., et al. (2025). Genome-wide exploration and characterization of the TCP gene family’s expression patterns in response to abiotic stresses in Siberian Wildrye (Elymus sibiricus L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26, 1925. doi: 10.3390/ijms26051925

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, B., Tao, X., and Dou, Q. (2022a). Meiotic chromosomal abnormality detected in a heterozygote of Elymus nutans. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.895437

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, B., Tao, X.-Y., and Dou, Q.-W. (2022b). Molecular cytogenetic study on the plants of Elymus nutans with varying fertility on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Plant Divers. 44, 617–624. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2021.12.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., Wang, P., An, Y., Wang, C.-M., Hao, Y., Zhou, Y., et al. (2022d). Endodermal apoplastic barriers are linked to osmotic tolerance in meso-xerophytic grass Elymus sibiricus. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1007494

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, B., Wang, R., Gong, J., Zhu, T., Long, S., Guo, H., et al. (2023b). Combined cold and drought stress-induced response of photosynthesis and osmotic adjustment in Elymus nutans Griseb. Agronomy 13, 2368. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13092368

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Zhao, L., Liu, Y., Huang, Z., Shi, J., Wang, Y., et al. (2022e). Restoration of a hillslope grassland with an ecological grass species (Elymus tangutorum) favors rainfall interception and water infiltration and reduces soil loss on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. CATENA 219, 106632. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106632

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Long, J., Dong, M., Wang, C., and Miao, Y. (2023). Effects of drought and salt stress on seed germination and seedling growth of Elymus nutans. PeerJ 11, e15968. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15968

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Long, J., Gao, X., and Miao, Y. (2025). Effects of environmental factors on the phenotypic traits and seed element accumulation of wild Elymus nutans in Tibet. Sci. Rep. 15, 1838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85415-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Long, J., Liu, D., Qiao, W., Wang, Y., Miao, Y., and Baosai, H. (2024). Response of Elymus nutans Griseb. seedling physiology and endogenous hormones to drought and salt stress. Sci. Rep. 14, 17810. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68894-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, X., Qi, J., Su, J., Liu, Y., and Zhang, A. (2025b). Effects of broad-leaved grass inhibitors and nitrogen fertilizer on seed production Elymus nutans in alpine meadow of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Front. Plant Sci. 16. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1470430

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, H.-H., Zheng, Y.-Y., Qiu, Y.-S., Tang, L.-B., Zhao, Y.-C., and Xie, W.-G. (2025a). Comprehensive prediction of potential spatiotemporal distribution patterns, priority planting regions, and introduction adaptability of Elymus sibiricus in the Chinese region. Front. Plant Sci. 15. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1470653

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Motsnyi, I. I., Halaiev, O. V., Alіeksіeіeva, T. G., Chebotar, G. O., Chebotar, S. V., Betekhtin, A., et al. (2024). Cytogenetic and molecular identification of novel wheat-Elymus sibiricus addition lines with resistance to leaf rust and the presence of leaf pubescence trait. Front. Plant Sci. 15. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1482211

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Okrushko, S. E. (2022). Allelopathic effect of couch grass (Elymus repens L.) on germination of common wheat seeds. Zemdirb.-Agric. 109, 323–328. doi: 10.13080/z-a.2022.109.041

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rahman, M., Zafar, Y., and Zhang, T. (Eds.) (2021). Cotton Precision Breeding (Cham: Springer International Publishing). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-64504-5

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rajak, P., Ganguly, A., Adhikary, S., and Bhattacharya, S. (2023). Internet of Things and smart sensors in agriculture: Scopes and challenges. J. Agric. Food Res. 14, 100776. doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100776

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ran, L., Wu, H., Xia, F., Xue, Y., Wei, W., Wang, J., et al. (2025). Effect of PGPR on growth and nutrient utilization of Elymus nutans Griseb at different temperatures. PloS One 20, e0323613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323613

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ren, W., Lin, C., Zhang, Z., and Shen, Y. (2025). Square-sowing patterns enhance mixed grass/legume communities of Elymus nutans and Onobrychis viciifolia production in the Qinghai Tibetan Plateau. Ind. Crops Prod. 223, 120159. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.120159

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ren, W., Zhang, Z., Shen, Y., Lin, C., Yang, X., Wang, G., et al. (2023). Adjusting spatial use to establish productive and stable Elymus nutans monocultures and mixed sowing systems. Field Crops Res. 302, 109091. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109091

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rieseberg, L. H. (2001). Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 (7), 351–358.

Google Scholar

Ringselle, B., Brandsæter, L. O., Mangerud, K., and Bergkvist, G. (2023). Vertical rhizome disking to reduce Elymus repens (quackgrass) abundance in grass-clover leys. Crop Prot. 172, 106301. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106301

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ringselle, B., Stankovic, M., Andersson, L., and Ninkovic, V. (2025). Sub-second low-energy electrical application effectively controls small but not established plants of scentless mayweed ( Tripleurospermum inodorum ), wild oat ( Avena fatua ) and couch grass ( Elymus repens ). Weed Res. 65, e70010. doi: 10.1111/wre.70010

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schuster, M. J., Wragg, P. D., Roth, A. M., Bockenstedt, P., Frelich, L., and Reich, P. B. (2025). Revegetation of Elymus grasses suppresses invasive Rhamnus cathartica in deciduous forest understories. Ecol. Eng. 210, 107438. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107438

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, S. and Araujo, A. S. F. (2025). Microbial crosstalk: decoding interactions to generate efficient SynComs. Trends Plant Sci. 30, 445–447. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2024.11.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, W., Liu, B., Guo, J., Yang, Y., Li, X., Chen, J., et al. (2024). Chromosome-scale assembly of the wild cereal relative Elymus sibiricus. Sci. Data 11, 823. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03622-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, Q., Simpson, W. R., Li, Y., Xu, C., De, K., and Li, X. (2024). Epichloë bromicola Enhances Elymus dahuricus Plant Growth and Antioxidant Capacity under Cadmium Stress. Agronomy 14, 365. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14020365

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shilpa, Thakur, R., and Prasad, P. (2024). Epigenetic regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Gen. Subj. 1868, 130661. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2024.130661

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, J., Yang, H., Yu, X., Chen, Y., Yang, C., He, Y., et al. (2025). Effects of combined application of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers on seed yield, seed quality and economic returns of Elymus nutans in alpine region. BMC Plant Biol. 25, 130. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06126-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Spadafora, C. (2023). The epigenetic basis of evolution. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 178, 57–69. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2023.01.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, R., Li, F., Liang, Y., Sheoran, N., Bai, J., Hao, L., et al. (2024). Responses of microbial community dynamics, co-occurrences, functional shifts, and natural fermentation profiles of Elymus nutans silage to altitudinal gradients. Microbiol. Spectr. 12, e02516–e02523. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02516-23

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, L., Huang, Q.-X., Song, Y., Wu, D.-D., Cheng, Y.-R., Zhang, C.-B., et al. (2022). Biosystematics studies on Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus (Poaceae: Triticeae). BMC Plant Biol. 22, 57. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03441-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Trivedi, P., Leach, J. E., Tringe, S. G., Sa, T., and Singh, B. K. (2020). Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 607–621. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Urfusová, R., Mahelka, V., Krahulec, F., and Urfus, T. (2021). Evidence of widespread hybridization among couch grasses ( Elymus, Poaceae). J. Syst. Evol. 59, 113–124. doi: 10.1111/jse.12563

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Urfusová, R., Urfus, T., Krahulec, F., Jarolímová, V., Kopecký, D., and Mahelka, V. (2024). Morphological, flow cytometric and cytogenetic evidence of a hybrid swarm between Elymus hispidus and E. repens in the Bílé Karpaty Mts, Czech Republic. Preslia 96, 97–122. doi: 10.23855/preslia.2024.097

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Van De Peer, Y., Mizrachi, E., and Marchal, K. (2017). The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 411–424. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.26

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Varshney, R. K., Bohra, A., Yu, J., Graner, A., Zhang, Q., and Sorrells, M. E. (2021). Designing future crops: genomics-assisted breeding comes of age. Trends Plant Sci. 26, 631–649. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.03.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, R., Sun, Y., Zong, J., Wang, Y., Cao, X., Wang, Y., et al. (2024). Remote sensing application in ecological restoration monitoring: A systematic review. Remote Sens. 16, 2204. doi: 10.3390/rs16122204

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, W., An, S., Zheng, Q., Qin, M., and Chen, T. (2022). Structural changes in vegetation coincident with reseeding Elymus nutans can increase perceived predation risk of plateau pikas (Ochotona curzoniae). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 255, 105745. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105745

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, X., Chen, X., Huang, Z., Ren, C., Hu, T., and Ru, Z. (2022). De novo assembly and characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of Elymus magellanicus (É.Desv.) Á.Löve 1984 (Poaceae, Pooideae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 7, 1873–1875. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2022.2135400

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, R., Liu, W., Zhang, Y., Liang, G., Li, W., and Liu, K. (2024). Response of Elymus sibiricus (Siberian Wildryegrass) to Combined Application of Nitrogen and Phosphorus during Aging on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Agronomy 14, 1543. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14071543

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiong, Y., Li, D., Liu, T., Xiong, Y., Yu, Q., Lei, X., et al. (2024a). Extensive transcriptome data providing great efficacy in genetic research and adaptive gene discovery: a case study of Elymus sibiricus L. (Poaceae, Triticeae). Front. Plant Sci. 15. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1457980

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiong, Y., Xiong, Y., Shu, X., Yu, Q., Lei, X., Li, D., et al. (2022a). Molecular Phylogeography and Intraspecific Divergences in Siberian Wildrye (Elymus sibiricus L.) Wild Populations in China, Inferred From Chloroplast DNA Sequence and cpSSR Markers. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.862759

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiong, Y., Xiong, Y., Yi, L., Su, X., Zhao, J., Bai, S., et al. (2024b). Discovery of the ethylene response factors in Elymus sibiricus on a transcriptome-wide scale and the beneficial function of EsiERF285 in combating drought and heat stress. Ind. Crops Prod. 210, 118170. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118170

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiong, Y., Yu, Q., Xiong, Y., Zhao, J., Lei, X., Liu, L., et al. (2022b). The complete mitogenome of Elymus sibiricus and insights into its evolutionary pattern based on simple repeat sequences of seed plant mitogenomes. Front. Plant Sci. 12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.802321

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, H., Song, J., and Yu, X. (2023). Artemisia baimaensis allelopathy has a negative effect on the establishment of Elymus nutans artificial grassland in natural grassland. Plant Signal. Behav. 18, 2163349. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2022.2163349

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, H., Su, J., and Qi, J. (2022). Autotoxicity effect of water extracts from rhizosphere soil of Elymus sibiricus in different planting years on seed germination, physiological characteristics and phytohormones of seedlings. PeerJ 10, e13768. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13768

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Z., Zhang, C., Cao, Q., Yu, Y., Liu, Y., Tong, Y., et al. (2025). Regulatory effects of mowing on biomass allocation and compensation growth mechanisms in Elymus species. Agriculture 15, 820. doi: 10.3390/agriculture15080820

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, Q., Xiong, Y., Su, X., Xiong, Y., Dong, Z., Zhao, J., et al. (2022). Comparative Metabolomic Studies of Siberian Wildrye (Elymus sibiricus L.): A New Look at the Mechanism of Plant Drought Resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 452. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010452

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, R., Chen, T., Chen, Z., Chen, H., Wei, X., Kamran, M., et al. (2024b). The Combination of Achnatherum inebrians Extracts and Soil Microorganisms Inhibited Seed Germination and Seedling Growth in Elymus nutans. Phyton 93, 567–580. doi: 10.32604/phyton.2024.047485

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Qi, H., Lu, G., Zhou, X., Wang, J., Li, J., et al. (2023). Non-targeted metabolomics analysis reveals the mechanism of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis regulating the cold-resistance of Elymus nutans. Front. Microbiol. 14. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1134585

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, F., Sun, M., Li, D., You, M., Yan, J., and Bai, S. (2024a). Metabolomic analysis of Elymus sibiricus exposed to UV-B radiation stress. Molecules 29, 5133. doi: 10.3390/molecules29215133

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, W., Yu, L., Han, B., Liu, K., and Shao, X. (2022a). Mycorrhizal inoculation enhances nutrient absorption and induces insect-resistant defense of Elymus nutans. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.898969

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., Zheng, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, N., Wang, Y., Liu, W., et al. (2022b). High-altitude genetic selection and genome-wide association analysis of yield-related traits in Elymus sibiricus L. Using SLAF sequencing. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.874409

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H. and Zhu, J.-K. (2025). Epigenetic gene regulation in plants and its potential applications in crop improvement. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 26, 51–67. doi: 10.1038/s41580-024-00769-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, J., Xie, Y., Kong, C., Lu, Z., Jia, H., Ma, Z., et al. (2023). Centromere repositioning and shifts in wheat evolution. Plant Commun. 4, 100556. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100556

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Y., Lin, X., Xie, W., and Liu, W. (2024). Full-length transcriptome and co-expression network analysis reveal molecular mechanisms of seed development in Elymus sibiricus. Seed Sci. Res. 34, 17–32. doi: 10.1017/S0960258524000084

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Y., Wang, N., Zhang, Z., Liu, W., and Xie, W. (2022). Identification of flowering regulatory networks and hub genes expressed in the leaves of Elymus sibiricus L. Using comparative transcriptome analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.877908

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhong, Z., Zhang, G., and Fu, G. (2023). Effect of Experiment Warming on Soil Fungi Community of Medicago sativa, Elymus nutans and Hordeum vulgare in Tibet. J. Fungi 9, 885. doi: 10.3390/jof9090885

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, J.-K. (2016). Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell 167, 313–324. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, L., Huang, J., Lu, X., and Zhou, C. (2022). Development of plant systemic resistance by beneficial rhizobacteria: Recognition, initiation, elicitation and regulation. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.952397

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, R., Xue, Y., and Qian, W. (2025). Molecular mechanisms and biological functions of active DNA demethylation in plants. Epigenet. Chromatin 18, 41. doi: 10.1186/s13072-025-00605-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhuoma, P., Tondrob, D., Qunpei, T., Fu, J., and Dan, S. (2024). Muti-omics revealed the mechanisms of MT-conferred tolerance of Elymus nutans Griseb. to low temperature at XiZang. BMC Plant Biol. 24, 901. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05583-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: climate resilience, de novo domestication, Elymus, negotiated genome, sustainable agriculture

Citation: Yu S and Dorji T (2026) Elymus (Poaceae) as a model for climate-resilient crop design. Front. Plant Sci. 17:1740805. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2026.1740805

Received: 06 November 2025; Accepted: 09 January 2026; Revised: 04 January 2026;
Published: 06 February 2026.

Edited by:

Xuming Li, Hugo Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., China

Reviewed by:

Artur Nosalewicz, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland
Mohammad Amir, Lovely Professional University, India

Copyright © 2026 Yu and Dorji. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Tsechoe Dorji, dHNlY2hvZWRvcmppQGl0cGNhcy5hYy5jbg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.