ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress
This article is part of the Research TopicMolecular Mechanisms Regulating Stress Resistance and Quality Formation in Root and Tuber CropsView all articles
Harbouring potential of enzymatic antioxidants in sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] nodal cultures under in vitro NaCl–mediated salinity stress conditions
Provisionally accepted- 1Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, India
- 2ICAR - Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, India
- 3ICAR - Regional Centre Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Bhubaneswar, India
- 4ICAR - Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru, India
- 5ICAR - Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Salinity stress hinders the production and productivity of sweet potato worldwide. Stringent selection under in vitro salinity conditions would be a nebulous approach to developing stress– tolerant lines. Eight pre–breeding sweet potato genotypes SP–12, SP–13, SP–23, SP–27, SP– 33, SP–42, SP–44, and SP–45, selected from a broad genetic base of 380 germplasms, were evaluated under NaCl–mediated salinity stress conditions using nodal cultures in vitro. Sweet potato nodal cultures were raised in Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium with different levels of salinity (0, 50, and 100 mM). The morphological, physiological, and antioxidative enzyme activities under control and salinity stress were assessed. Shoot and root organogenesis under the NaCl–induced MS medium (100 mM) were consistent in the genotype SP–13. The antioxidative enzymes increased significantly [0.1–fold in Catalase (CAT) to 2.7–fold in Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and Guaiacol peroxidase (GPX)] with increasing salinity stress conditions compared to the control across the genotypes. The genotypes SP–13, SP–12, and SP–42 exhibited a higher stress tolerance index (STI) for AOEs. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) matrix reveals a strong integration among the growth parameters and AOE. Among the antioxidant enzymes, Ascorbate peroxidase (APX, r=0.74) and dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR, r=0.60) showed strong and positive correlations with glutathione reductase (GR). Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) exhibited a strong negative correlation with shoot parameters, including shoot length (r=–0.74) and shoot number (r=–0.71), indicating its association with shoot retardation. Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering indicated that the genotypes SP–13, followed by SP–12, and SP–42, are closely related to higher growth performances and better antioxidative enzyme mechanisms. Overall, SP–13, SP–12, and SP– 42 performed well, maintaining plantlet growth and AOE properties. The results encourage the rapid screening of the more extensive pre–breeding populations to streamline breeding strategies and develop salinity–tolerant plants.
Keywords: Antioxidative enzymes, in vitro screening, Salinity, Stress Tolerance, Sweet potato
Received: 06 Nov 2025; Accepted: 26 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Mishra, DASGUPTA, Tripathy, Krishnappa, SINGH, Arutselvan, SAHOO and Sahoo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Ananya Mishra
Manas Ranjan Sahoo
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
