REVIEW article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Sustainable and Intelligent Phytoprotection
A Review of Remote Sensing Based Crop Yield Estimation: Machine Learning Techniques and Environmental, Algorithmic, Hardware Limitations
Muhammad Aman 1
Abdul Sattar Mashori 1
MANSOOR JAN 2
Ziqi Han 3
Fuzhong Li 3
Sana Ullah Jan 4
Syed Aziz Shah 5
1. College of Agricultural Engineering and School of software, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong 030801, China
2. College of Information Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Changzhou, 213200, Jiangsu, China, Changzhou, China
3. School of Software, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu Jinzhong 030801, China, Taigu, China
4. School of Computing, Engineering and the Built Environment Edinburgh Napier University, UK., Edinburgh, United Kingdom
5. Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry University, CV1 5FB, United Kingdom, Coventry, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Advancements in agricultural technologies have increasingly emphasized on technical innovations aimed at improving the predictability and reliability of agricultural outputs. These aspects encompass developments in agricultural machinery, automation technologies, biotechnology, and controlled environment farming systems. This article focuses on Remote Sensing (RS) based approaches applied to agricultural yield estimation for both crops and plants. RS technologies offer enhanced precision and scalability, making them particularly effective for large scale agricultural monitoring and analysis. A systematic classification of RS based methodologies employed for crops yield estimation are presented in this study. These methodologies are categorized into, (i) Sensor Based approaches, (ii) Platform Based approaches, (iii) Analytical and Modeling based methods, and (iv) Machine Learning (ML) driven models. Based on findings reported across multiple studies, it is observed that Deep Learning (DL) based architectures consistently achieve superior performance across key evaluation metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. This performance advantage stems from their capacity to learn hierarchical representations, capture complex nonlinear relationships, scale efficiently with large datasets, and reduce reliance on manual feature engineering. Following this classification, our article presents a comprehensive discussion of the limitations associated with these methodologies. These challenges are organized into four major categories, (i) Environmental, (ii) Algorithmic, (iii) Hardware and Operational, and (iv) Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) related limitations. The adopted classification framework facilitates readers in clearly identifying and addressing the key challenges associated with effective yield estimation in crops and plants. Moreover, the article concludes by outlining several open future research directions intended to support and guide both early career and experienced researchers in this domain.
Summary
Keywords
Crop Productivity Prediction and Assessment, Limitations In Yield Estimation, Machine Learning Based Yield Estimation, remote sensing, Wireless Sensor Networks Based Agriculture
Received
09 November 2025
Accepted
20 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Aman, Mashori, JAN, Han, Li, Jan and Shah. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Muhammad Aman; Fuzhong Li
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.