Vikender Kaur1*
Shashank Kumar Yadav1*
Bindu Yadav1
Sukham Madaan2
Munisha Kheralia1
Viswanathan Chinnusamy3- 1Division of Germplasm Evaluation, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India
- 2Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Chaudhary Charan Singh (CCS) Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India
- 3Division of Plant Physiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), New Delhi, India
Strategic optimisation of Root System Architecture (RSA) represents a critical frontier for stabilising crop productivity amid increasingly unpredictable moisture-deficit regimes. Understanding key root traits underlying effective drought response is necessary to harness the genetic diversity associated with root growth patterns and environmental adaptations. Many functionally significant root architectural traits have been reported, and the mechanistic importance of some of the anatomical ideotypes, such as the increased metaxylem vessel diameter to reduce axial hydraulic resistance to maintain leaf water potential and change in root growth angle to promote geotropic deep-soil moisture foraging, are discussed in this review. Despite the identification of these characteristics, the knowledge gap in their integration into predictive breeding frameworks remains. This review addresses this fragmentation by critically evaluating how the bottleneck of the ‘phenotyping’ process is being broken down through non-invasive high-throughput phenotyping modalities. Dynamic root-soil interfaces can be spatio-temporally quantified in situ using non-destructive technologies such as X-ray computed tomography and MRI, which can detect developmental plasticity masked by destructive sampling. Artificial Intelligence (AI), especially Convolutional Neural Networks, enables automated extraction of high-dimensional topological parameters from complex digital rhizograms. Present review integrates recent advances in phenotyping with molecular regulatory mechanisms, bridging two traditionally disparate fields. By focusing on the DRO1/qSOR1 loci and ABA-auxin crosstalk, we establish critical connections between molecular regulation and field-scale architectural performance. The resulting multi-scale roadmap may help in targeted selection of climate-resilient cultivars to maximize resource use efficiency.
1 Introduction
Abiotic stresses, such as extreme temperatures, salinity, and drought are increasingly threatening global agricultural productivity, particularly in essential food crops (Harrison, 2021; Bai et al., 2022; Salehi et al., 2023; Rahnama et al., 2024). Drought is believed to have affected around 75% of harvestable land globally, resulting in cumulative production losses estimated at 166 billion U.S. dollars (Kim et al., 2019). Drought exerts a detrimental effect on plant diversity across multiple biological scales. This manifests through morphological impairments (reduced leaf area and stunted elongation), physiological disruptions (decreased stomatal conductance and leaf water potential), and biochemical shifts (ROS accumulation and proline synthesis) (Kaur and Behl, 2010; Kaur et al., 2017; Gupta et al., 2020). Additionally, anatomical alterations such as xylem cavitation further compromise overall growth and development (Kaur et al., 2011). Identifying and developing superior germplasm with enhanced water use efficiency is crucial for minimizing yield losses and attaining global food stability (Manju et al., 2019; 2023; Kaur et al., 2024). Plants are sessile beings that need to adapt to variable environmental cues through phenotypic plasticity involving extrinsic and intrinsic mechanisms that can be broadly categorized into drought escape, drought tolerance, drought recovery, and drought avoidance. Key root traits and adaptive mechanisms to cope with drought stress at different structural and functional organization in plants are summarized in Table 1. Among these, drought avoidance is the primary mechanism achieved through several metabolic and structural adaptive traits involving minimizing water loss and optimizing water uptake. These adaptive traits refer to complex processes governed by intricate regulatory networks involving numerous genes that, in turn, trigger varied morpho-physiological and biochemical adaptations such as increased root growth, reduced leaf area, accumulation of osmoprotectant, ABA-mediated regulation of stomatal aperture, and cytokinin-induced delayed leaf senescence (Figure 1). Enhanced or improved root growth remains the key modus for maintaining cellular water and nutrient equilibrium under moisture-deficit conditions. The degree of interaction between the root and its perirhizomal environment relies on its spatial arrangement and structure at the cellular to whole-plant level. To ensure maximum resource sequestering with the least metabolic cost, plants alter their Root System Architecture (RSA) in response to drought stress (Afonso et al., 2025). RSA refers to the spatial distribution of all root parts, including the root axis, number, seminal and lateral roots, density, and length of root hairs (Lynch, 1995; de Dorlodot et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2024). In addition to structural modifications, roots also govern numerous metabolic activities in the shoot, leaves, and other aerial parts of the plant upon sensing moisture heterogeneity in the soil (Maurel and Nacry, 2020). For instance, several reports fortify that photosynthetic assimilates are mobilized to roots rather than shoots in a water-scarce environment. This strategic carbon reallocation provides the energetic foundation required for the dynamic spatial remodeling of the root system. There is increasing acceptance that optimizing RSA and its interaction with the environment will play a key role in enhancing crop productivity, especially under input-starved conditions (Silim et al., 1993; Price et al., 2002b; Ober et al., 2005; Kaur et al., 2020; Manju et al., 2019; 2023; Sonia et al., 2023; Rahnama et al., 2024; Singh et al., 2024).
Table 1. Key root traits and adaptive mechanisms to cope with drought stress at different structural and functional organization.
Figure 1. Various response mechanisms triggered in plants after perception of drought stress stimuli by plant roots.
Evolutionarily, plants have been classified as monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous, possessing distinct root morphologies. Monocots have a fibrous root system, while dicots possess a tap root system. While monocots and dicots possess fundamentally different root systems, a shared characteristic is their tendency to branch profusely and alter architecture in response to the external environment to access resources (Morris et al., 2017). Therefore, understanding root architecture and the underlying molecular mechanisms governing its adaptation must be deciphered to identify and develop resilient genotypes. However, challenges in evaluating plant root systems are coupled with poorly understood genetic control. Firstly, most methodologies employed for assessing RSA are destructive sampling techniques, often resulting in the loss of finer-scale root features (fine lateral roots and root hair) (Bucksch et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2024). Secondly, destructive root phenotyping approaches are labour-intensive, time-consuming, and involve a high rate of root loss. Thirdly, the optimal root systems for crop growth vary vastly and are largely unknown due to the variations in environmental conditions. This environmental heterogeneity necessitates the deployment of high-throughput, precision technologies capable of capturing dynamic root responses across diverse soil-moisture profiles. Therefore, in situ non-invasive root phenotyping approaches are necessary for deciphering RSA with its environmental dynamics. The present review comprehensively elaborates on various aspects and progressions made in the realm of ex-situ (conventional) and in-situ root phenotyping (3D representation) approaches, with a brief insight into imaging systems and processing. Here, we summarized functionally significant root architectural traits in relation to root morphology, alongside the underlying molecular and physiological processes that govern them. Crucially, these physiological processes, including phytohormonal crosstalk and water-potential signaling, serve as the primary regulatory drivers that translate environmental stress into specific architectural modifications. Understanding these links is essential for deciphering how RSA is dynamically regulated to sustain plant performance under drought stress. Given that genetic factors largely govern root anatomy and architecture in conjunction with extrinsic or environmental factors, numerous QTLs, genes, and transcription factors governing RSA under drought stress have been elucidated. Further enhancements in RSA have been achieved efficiently through various genetic engineering and genome editing approaches lately. Finally, we have outlined the key roles of QTLs, genes, and phytohormones in modulating the response of RSA towards drought tolerance. These genetic and hormonal regulators control the partitioning of metabolic resources, balancing the energy cost of expansive root proliferation against the maintenance of shoot biomass and yield stability. Such insights are currently being explored through precision breeding and genome editing to optimize crop performance under water-limited conditions.
1.1 Precision phenotyping of RSA
Studying root systems has traditionally been hindered by their subterranean location. Nonetheless, recent technological breakthroughs have yielded diverse methods to characterize root architecture, which can be broadly classified into destructive and non-destructive approaches.
1.2 Destructive approaches
Destructive or invasive root phenotyping involves the physical removal or disruption of the plant and its subterranean system to analyze architectural and morphological traits. These procedures range from partial excavation, where localized sections of the root system are exposed for observation, to complete removal from the growth substrate. Such methods are inherently restrictive, as they typically result in the termination of the plant’s life cycle and the loss of fine-scale features like lateral roots and root hairs. The characterization of RSA under controlled environments often relies on substituting soil with alternative media to enhance image acquisition and data throughput. Various High-throughput RSA phenotyping platforms have been established, utilizing semi-solid gels to maintain 3D root topology (Nagel et al., 2009) and paper-based or fabric-based 2D rhizotrons that constrain root growth to a single plane for rapid quantification (Hund et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2011; Le Marié et al., 2016; Rahnama et al., 2011). Additionally, hydroponic cultures (Pace et al., 2014) and pouches (Adu et al., 2014) offer precise control over nutrient availability for rapid screening of root traits in a non-soil environment (Pace et al., 2014).
Such systems offer convenient operation and reduced environmental noise, resulting in greater efficiency and a standardized micro-environment. Additionally, these methods efficiently derive 2D/3D root architecture parameters by imaging roots from multiple view angles and subsequent analyses (Figure 2). These technologies allow for the precise quantification of critical spatial traits, including root growth angle, maximum vertical depth, total root volume, and convex hull area. By integrating these high-resolution metrics, researchers can construct a holistic representation of the root system’s spatial exploration within the soil profile. However, the constrained 2D growth and artificial composition of the growth medium limit the applicability of these methods to the agronomic utility that is confined to the seedling stage, which may not always be representative of the mature plant (Watt et al., 2013). Furthermore, RSA is influenced by a complex array of edaphic factors. Physical constraints such as mechanical resistance and bulk density, alongside chemical variables like pH, nutrient availability, temperature, oxygen availability, and microbial composition, influence root development. Exploiting transparent or opaque soil offers a promising approach that balances visibility and soil-like simulative mechanical resistance for root studies (Downie et al., 2012). Given the challenges of accurately simulating these soil conditions in artificial systems, field-based phenotyping is crucial for comprehensive root system evaluation.
Figure 2. Phenotyping techniques and image analyses for identification of better root system architecture (RSA).
Field-based RSA phenotyping relies on diverse methods, including soil-filled rhizo-boxes or sand rhizotrons (Thaler and Pagès, 1995; Giulani et al., 2005; Devienne-Barret et al., 2006), soil-filled transparent glass rhizotrons (Nagel et al., 2009; Ytting et al., 2014), flat cartridges (Nagel et al., 2012), and trench excavation (Bucksch et al., 2014), particularly in Arabidopsis, rice, and maize. The conventional approach for soil-based RSA phenotyping involves coring or shovelomics excavation of soil blocks, followed by careful root extraction without damaging finer roots, and finally washing of roots for detailed analysis (Lynch, 2011; Trachsel et al., 2010; Iyer-Pascuzzi et al., 2010; Pierret et al., 2013; Rahnama et al., 2019; 2024). Although extraction and cleaning roots from soil inevitably alter their 3D topology, this approach has been extensively employed in root phenotypic studies. Despite limitations in capturing the full three-dimensional structure, these systems provide substantial information regarding root quantity, length, and overall size (Pierret et al., 2013; Kumar et al., 2014). Transparent glass rhizotrons provide a simulated 3D view of root growth and development, specifically for those root portions interacting with the transparent surfaces. The lysimetric system is another approach that consists of a set of long and large PVC tubes filled with several cubic meters of soil encapsulated with an arrangement to mimic field conditions and monitor water use (Vadez et al., 2008; 2013; Madaan et al., 2018). Nevertheless, the soil-based root phenotyping approach is time and labour-intensive. Additional challenges include low heritability, soil heterogeneity, and manual analysis being prone to subjective errors, particularly for quantifying minuscule root traits.
1.3 Non-destructive approach
High-throughput phenotyping provides a non-destructive method for assessing root traits and their correlations with crop performance in diverse environments. By avoiding destructive sampling, non-invasive root phenotyping enables researchers to optically analyse root traits for growth, development, and activity in its natural environment. Further, non-invasive root phenotyping can assist in selecting promising root trait phenotypes with superior WUE and yield-related attributes. The selection of phenotyping methods must be optimized according to the biological scale of the plant, the physical properties of the soil, and the specific architectural traits under investigation. The choice of phenotyping platforms is crucially governed by imaging resolution and inherent architectural differences between monocots and dicots. For the Poaceae family, the structural complexity of multiaxial root systems comprising embryonic seminal roots and post-embryonic nodal roots necessitates high-resolution modalities. In species such as rice and barley, X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are used to resolve microscopic lateral branching and root hair zones (Iyer-Pascuzzi et al., 2010; van Dusschoten et al., 2015). In contrast, the expansive taproot systems of dicots like canola (Brassica rapa) are effectively monitored using 2D rhizotrons or gel-based systems to track primary root elongation (Adu et al., 2014). For larger cereal crops, such as maize and wheat, where deep-rooting and crown architecture are key yield drivers, specialized platforms like RhizoVision and Shovelomics are employed to quantify nodal root angles (Lynch, 2019; Seethepalli et al., 2020). For high-biomass or storage roots, such as those in cassava, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is preferred to capture coarse root bulking rates (Delgado et al., 2017). Ultimately, the optimization of the signal-to-noise ratio must be calibrated to the biological scale of the species, ensuring that the system’s spatial resolution matches the specific root diameter and growth habit of the plant under investigation (Wasson et al., 2020). Minirhizotrons are an in-situ analysis of root dynamics, in which transparent tubes are inserted into the soil equipped with specialized cameras that allow for undisturbed, high-resolution imaging of root growth and behavior at the soil-tube interface (Smit et al., 2000). Despite the availability of multiple rhizotron designs, their implementation is often hindered by high cost and operational complexity, limiting widespread adoption. Additionally, image acquisition is confined to white light and usually necessitates human intervention for tracing roots. However, independent groups have made several structural enhancements. For instance, implementing a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) as a root detector for minirhizotron images of variable crop systems and environments, and utilizing a Robotic Minirhizotron System (RMR), has provided replicable results (Peters et al., 2023; Nair et al., 2023). Likewise, the integration of SoilCam has enabled a 360° panoramic view with multiple spectral imaging of roots in real-time (Rahman et al., 2020). Despite advanced capabilities, 2D-based root phenotyping techniques pose several limitations owing to growth, environmental, and technical hindrances. 2D images cannot fully capture the three-dimensional structure of roots, particularly their angles and orientations, which affect the analysis of root growth patterns. Further, 2D images do not provide direct information about root volume and density, as denser root systems tend to overlap, hindering accurate segmentation and analysis. Although 2D root phenotyping has contributed significantly to our understanding of root morphology, its inherent drawbacks have prompted the advancement of 3D imaging and analysis technologies to capture the intricate details of RSA. Several 3D imaging methods permit in situ visualization of root systems as they grow in natural soil, preserving the temperature gradient, topology, and composition attributes. The methods have been successfully implemented for the assessment of yield traits in crops under drought conditions (Wasaya et al., 2018). X-ray computed tomography (CT) has been extensively adopted for the soil-based three-dimensional configuration of roots (Gregory et al., 2003). Although desirable, limitations of this method include potential loss of detail due to lower resolution, challenges in analyzing complex 3D root systems, low data processing speed, and the requirement for immobile, costly equipment (Mairhofer et al., 2013). An alternative imaging strategy is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Rascher et al., 2011; Metzner et al., 2014). Recently, MRI-based root phenotyping of 288 wheat seedlings has been reported (Pflugfelder et al., 2022) and designated as medium-throughput phenotyping. Integrating Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with Positron Emission Tomography (PET) facilitates the imaging of photosynthetically acquired carbon in the root system (Jahnke et al., 2009; Nagel et al., 2009). However, the presence of ferromagnetic soil components in iron-rich soil hinders the absolute analysis of root morphology (Flavel et al., 2012). Ground-penetrating radar is an alternate non-invasive geophysical instrument that employs electromagnetic waves to sense features below the surface, dependent upon the physical and dielectric attributes of materials. GPR distinguishes coarse roots from the surrounding soil due to their contrasting dielectric permittivity, registering them as hyperbolic reflections that these structures generate in the radar datasets (Lombardi et al., 2021). Although GPR technique has been employed in assessing root biomass, specifically using rhizosphere imaging (Lorenzo et al., 2010), the technique requires further refinement to achieve broad applicability in physiological and genetic investigations. Root Electrical Capacitance (REC) represents an alternative 3D phenotyping technique that establishes root structure analysis of low-frequency alternating current running between the plant stem and the surrounding soil medium. REC has been widely applied in RSA-based studies in maize, soybean, wheat, and some grassland species (Cseresnyés et al., 2020). In a recent advance, Rayleigh scattering-based fiber optic sensors (FOS) have been deployed to observe soil’s physical properties (such as strain, temperature, and vibration), thereby defining the RSA in real-time (Weihs et al., 2024). Continuous refinements are applied to these techniques and their utility for large-scale root phenotyping applications is due for a thorough investigation. Even as they continue to evolve, these approaches present unsurpassed capacity for the kinetics of root expansion within the rhizosphere.
2 Modeling and simulation
Following the acquisition of multiple images depicting the root system’s morphology, the primary task becomes transforming these visual representations into quantifiable information. A primary impediment to the automatized quantification of lateral root structure is distinguishing overlapping root networks, a problem particularly noticeable in fully grown plants propagated in both two-dimensional and three-dimensional systems. The problem is further aggravated in mature roots adhered to root particles, thereby compromising image quality and subsequent data analysis. Although, complex traits like total root area and length are easily quantified from images without manual input, as they don’t require identifying specific root sections. Addressing these requirements, a diverse array of trait-specific software exhibiting varying success rates has been developed. A comprehensive summary of diverse laboratory-to-field methodologies (Table 2) and the associated software for RSA phenotyping is provided in Table 3. These packages primarily function by generating a root hierarchy based on their morphological features, physiological roles, anatomical properties, spatial configuration, and growth dynamics. Although several packages can process images autonomously, numerous systems still require human intervention for the rectification of errors within the image processing. In addition, the majority of the software employs a skeletonization method incorporating both the topological structure and the concept of local object symmetries found within the roots. Many of the quantitative traits involving root numbers, diameters, lengths, and the number of root tips have been processed for image-based analysis using Image J (Schneider et al., 2012), WinRHIZO™, EZ-Rhizo (Armengaud et al., 2009), GROWSCREEN_ROOT (Nagel et al., 2012), IJ_Rhizo (Pierret et al., 2013), SmartRoot (Lobet et al., 2011), DART (Le Bot et al., 2010) RootTrace (Clark et al., 2013), RootNav (Pound et al., 2013)and Root System Analyzer (Leitner et al., 2014). Soil particles on roots can hinder the efficacy of tools like WinRHIZO™ and EZ-Rhizo, leading to inaccurate root measurements, such as root tip counts (Kumar et al., 2014). Accurately distinguishing primary and lateral roots is crucial for measuring how different root parts respond to varied stresses. Conventional software applications like SmartRoot, EZ-Rhizo, GROWSCREEN_ROOT, and Root System Analyzer are semi-autonomous but widely used for assessing growth kinetics and branching angles. However, ARIA (Pace et al., 2014), RTipC (Kumar et al., 2014), RootNav 2.0 (Yasrab et al., 2019), WinRhizo, Root Reader 3D (Clark et al., 2011), GiaRoots (Galkovskyi et al., 2012), and DIRT/3D (Liu et al., 2021) have been extensively used for high-throughput 3D autonomous extraction of complex RSA phenotyping, particularly locating first and second-order root tips without user interaction. Recent advancements encompass various root phenotyping models, including 3D, 4D, allometric, R-SWMS, and response surface models that can quantify changes in RSA resulting from external environmental stimuli. Several listed software packages offer pre-configured extensions or allow customization through open-source code. Besides improvement in image segmentation and reconstruction, the ultimate phenotyping systems should be flexible and fully automated to accelerate processing and increase accuracy.
Table 2. Various techniques for minimal to non-invasive analysis of root morphometric and growth dynamic parameters.
Table 3. Comparative overview of digital phenotyping platforms for quantifying multidimensional RSA and physiological indices.
2.1 Artificial intelligence assisted root phenotyping
AI can revolutionize the field of root phenotyping. Conventional methods for root analysis are labour and time-intensive and are primarily destructive approaches. By implementing machine learning (ML) and computer vision techniques, AI is significantly streamlining and enhancing root analysis protocols, offering crucial perspectives on root architecture, dynamic development, and resilience against extreme environmental cues. Fundamentally, AI relies on the principle of machine learning, a methodology that enables systems to learn patterns and execute judgment without prescriptive coding. Notably, ML’s major advantage involves its intrinsic ability to generalize underlying trends following intensive data assimilation. Further developing this capability, Deep Learning (DL) constitutes a specialized subset of machine learning, relying on representation learning to build models of considerable sophistication. ML’s effectiveness stems from its capability to generalize knowledge from assimilated data, while deep learning (DL), a specialized subset, utilizes representation learning for constructing intricate conceptual models.
Deep Learning, consequently, encompasses the acquisition of hierarchical feature layers like edges, localized motifs, and individual object components, holistically representing image data. The model secures these features utilizing general-purpose learning mechanisms that function autonomously, free from human input (LeCun et al., 2015). Comprising DL convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are prominent subclasses. Designed for 2D image data, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are optimized for tasks centered on spatial relationships. However, Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), analyze sequential data, making them appropriate for inputs such as time-series data, streams of video, and even certain image types. Conversely, AI-based high-resolution analyses significantly improve downstream segmentation and data interpretation steps, particularly the use of computer vision (CV) and deep learning (DL) has rapidly gained distinction as the conventional approach in plant phenomics research. Numerous AI-driven tools are now largely being employed for RSA assessment. CNN-based Caffe DL library has been used for assessing the presence or absence of root tips in an image with an accuracy of 98.4% and overcoming overfitting issues through the random deactivation of fully connected neurons during each iteration. Several graphical user interface (GUI) DL segmentation and annotation tools, such as RootPainter segmentation and RhizoVision Explorer, have been widely used for branch-style, taproot-style, and taproot-branch roots quantification (Xu et al., 2022). Grayscale images of greenhouse-grown pea cultivars were analyzed using WinRhizo 2012b Pro to extract root features such as diameter, length, and surface area. To mitigate low signal-to-noise ratios in root imagery, hybrid machine learning frameworks—integrating radial basis function Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) classifiers have been explored, achieving up to 86% accuracy in feature extraction (Zhao et al., 2016; 2017). Recent advancements, such as RootNav 2.0, leverage multitask Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to automate both image segmentation and root order assignment. This deep learning approach facilitates robust architectural quantification across diverse seedling morphologies, including Arabidopsis, rapeseed, and wheat, using standard RGB input (Yasrab et al., 2019). Further, the consortium of SVM, KNN, and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) algorithms has been used for the detection of root decay in Wheat (Shu et al., 2021). These highlighted examples illustrate several major developments within RSA image analysis, driven by enhanced processing speed resulting from the evolution of accelerated graphics processing units (GPUs). Current efforts emphasize leveraging ML for full automation in segmentation and achieving root detection with greater efficiency and precision, accomplished via a diverse array of sensors. In this realm, SegNet and U-Net are the two popular convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures widely used for semantic segmentation tasks, including root phenotyping. Despite their shared characteristics, SegNet and U-Net are potent CNN frameworks for root phenotyping, exhibiting crucial distinctions in structure and overall output. Selecting one necessitates evaluating context-specific factors, including image dimension, complexity of root structures, and access to computing power. U-Net is frequently utilized in root phenotyping because its skip connections preserve high-resolution spatial features, allowing for the accurate segmentation of fine lateral roots. However, AI-driven analysis is currently constrained by the scarcity of expert-annotated ground-truth datasets and geometric occlusion from overlapping root structures. Furthermore, the algorithmic opacity of deep learning necessitates the integration of Explainable AI (XAI) to ensure the biological interpretability and cross-platform reproducibility of architectural traits. Overcoming these challenges will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of AI in advancing our understanding of plant root biology.
3 Root morphological adaptations for regulation of water acquisition
Several root traits, such as root length density, branching, root diameter, root cap, root hairs, root hydraulic conductance, and root hydro-stimulation, can significantly contribute to trait-targeted breeding to achieve sustainable yield and drought resistance. Major root traits of significant importance in leveraging water uptake have been summarized in Supplementary Table 1.
3.1 Deep root growth and root length density
Root length density (RLD) is a measure of the total length of roots per unit volume of soil, serving as an indicator of lateral root expansion. Water uptake is positively correlated with RLD up to a critical threshold and is largely governed by soil moisture (Siopongco et al., 2005). A higher root length density, characterized by deeper and more abundant root growth, is generally associated with improved drought tolerance (Gowda et al., 2011; Henry et al., 2011; Lynch, 2013; Rahnama et al., 2024; Wasson et al., 2012). Drought stress triggers a root system response, characterized by increased fibrous root production, decreased lateral root width, and a shift in root biomass (Smith and De Smet, 2012; Manju et al., 2023; Sonia et al., 2023; Singh et al., 2024; Afonso et al., 2025). Research suggests extensive root development is advantageous in regions reliant on seasonal rainfall. Thus, less RLD in shallow layers of soil and more RLD in medium/deep soil layers has been considered as an efficient breeding strategy in environments subjected to the availability of deep water later in the crop season (Wasson et al., 2012; Lynch, 2013). Also, deep water extraction would be more beneficial if it is available during the most critical water demand, as shards of evidence suggest for higher grain yield wheat (Kirkegaard et al., 2007; Manschadi et al., 2006), chickpea (Zaman-Allah et al., 2011; Kashiwagi et al., 2015), and pearl millet (Vadez et al., 2013). While deep and profuse root systems are valuable for water acquisition, they are not the sole determinants of a reliable water supply. For example, in a mapping population between the deep-rooted rice Azucena and a shallow-rooted Bala, the water-conserving shoot traits from Bala were more pronounced than the root traits from the Azucena allele (Price et al., 2002a). Concisely, although roots are potentially important for the uptake of moisture in plants, they may or may not contribute to drought adaptation in all stress conditions owing to: (i) RLD, deep or profuse rooting is not very beneficial for water extraction in shallow soils/in the soil where there is no water at depth, or under conditions of mild water stress; (ii) root growth is closely coordinated with shoot growth and eventually deeper rooting might lead to faster soil water depletion.
3.2 Root hairs
Root hairs are epidermal cell extensions covering around 77% of the surface area and are considered imperative for water and nutrient uptake (Gilroy and Jones, 2000; Emons and Ketelaar, 2009; Libault et al., 2010; Datta et al., 2011). Root hairs substantially increase root surface and thus have a key role in water absorption and thereby compensate for reduced root length in response to abiotic stressors, primarily drought, heat, and salinity (Wasson et al., 2012; Rahnama et al., 2011; 2019; 2024; Wang et al., 2024). Kato et al. (2013) correlated the water absorption with root hair length while investigating a root hair-less Arabidopsis line, NR23, implying that the amount of absorbed water is dependent upon the abundance of root hairs. It was also suggested that an increase in the number of lateral roots could not compensate for the loss of root hairs in NR23. Tanaka et al. (2014) also opined that a substantial amount of water was absorbed through root hairs, while other root epidermal cells could be responsible for the remaining uptake and absorption. Barley mutants lacking root hairs exhibited reduced water uptake despite having extensive root branching (Segal et al., 2008). In addition to increasing the root’s absorptive surface, root hairs can grow into minute pores and attach themselves to soil grains, leading to intercepting and sequestering immobile or sluggish nutrients, primarily soil-bound ferrous and phosphorous particles.
3.3 Root xylem vessels size, abundance, and hydraulic characteristics
Plants with long specific root lengths and thinner diameters can efficiently increase water uptake by expanding their contact area with the soil and enhance hydraulic conductivity by counteracting the xylem’s apoplastic barriers (Rieger and Litvin, 1999; Solari et al., 2006; Hernández et al., 2010). Further, larger xylem vessels and increased metaxylem numbers are better equipped to absorb water from deeper soil layers under drought stress, owing to improved hydraulic conductivity in soybean and olives (Prince et al., 2017; Tan et al., 2020). Accordingly, reduced root diameter has been advocated for increased acquisition of water under drought (Wasson et al., 2012). In rice, drought-tolerant cv. Dular was reported to have a smaller xylem diameter than drought-susceptible IR64 under water stress conditions (Henry et al., 2012). Also, the smaller diameter of metaxylem vessels contributes to increased resistance to cavitation (Guet et al., 2015). In wheat, the reduced metaxylem diameter of seminal roots resulted in enhanced yield attributes such as yield performance and grain yield under drought stress (Richards and Passioura, 1989). It has been reported that xerophytic plants have fine roots with smaller diameters and more SRL (Hernández et al., 2010; Henry et al., 2012). Moreover, the abundance and increased conductance of aquaporins, responsible for the regulation of the passage of water acquisition, are associated with increased root hydraulic conductivity and thus may lead to compensation for reduced surface area (Parent et al., 2009; Vandeleur et al., 2009; Laur and Hacke, 2013).
3.4 Root cap and hydrotropism
The root cap has sensory cells responsible for sensing the moisture gradient through a phenomenon known as hydrotropism (Miyazawa et al., 2008; Takahashi and Scott, 1993; Takahashi et al., 2003). Hydrotropism is important for controlling the growth orientation of roots, obtaining water, establishing a plant stand, and thus drought avoidance. However, the degree of orientation or bending of the roots varies with species. For example, de-tipped roots do not alter hydrotropism in rice (Nakajima et al., 2017) and cucumber (Fujii et al., 2018) seedlings. In contrast, de-tipped root caps in pea and maize block hydrotropism. The removal of this tissue eliminates the site of hydro-sensing and the subsequent generation of signal transducers, such as abscisic acid (ABA), which are required to induce the differential growth that drives root curvature (Eapen et al., 2005; Takahashi and Scott, 1993). Arabidopsis is a popular model for studying hydrotropism due to its high sensitivity (Eapen et al., 2005; Takahashi et al., 2009; Cassab et al., 2013; Miyazawa et al., 2009; Saucedo et al., 2012). A. thaliana mutants with impaired or altered hydrotropism were identified and named ‘mizu-kussei’ (miz), expressed primarily in root tips and hydathodes (Kobayashi et al., 2007). Interestingly, MIZ1 domain homologs are not reported in animal or microbial genomes, suggesting their exclusive role in terrestrial plant species. Thus, evident that MIZ1 plays a crucial role in sensing moisture gradients and root hydrotropic response, which might be a stress avoidance strategy to cope with drought, as evidenced in Kaur et al. (2020). Other hydrotropic mutants, nhr1 and ahr1, were also reported (Eapen et al., 2003; Saucedo et al., 2012). The nhr1 mutant did not display hydrotropism in the presence of water potential gradients but displayed ortho-gravitropism (Eapen et al., 2003). The site of water perception and growth regulation was determined to be located in the root cortex (Dietrich et al., 2017). Intriguingly, hydrotropism was found to be independent of polar auxin transport, as the inhibition of both influx and efflux carriers of auxin did not alter the hydrotropic response (Kaneyasu et al., 2007).
4 Determinants governing RSA
Comprehending the mechanisms regulating root architecture and hydropatterning is crucial for developing crops that exhibit enhanced resilience to abiotic stresses, especially drought. These include phytohormone-mediated regulation and genetic regulation of RSA.
4.1 Phytohormone-mediated regulation of RSA
Roots are the primary organs for perceiving and transmitting osmotic stress through osmosensors in response to abiotic stresses. The complex interplay of phytohormone homeostasis, signaling, and their interactions plays a crucial role in hydrotropic responses under favorable and adverse environmental conditions. Abiotic stresses, particularly drought stress, trigger a series of signal cascades involving the production, distribution, and signaling of phytohormones, including abscisic acid, auxin, cytokinin, ethylene, jasmonic acid, and brassinosteroids, impacting drought responsiveness in plants (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Hormonal interactions in regulating root architecture in response to drought stress. Arrowheads indicate a positive interaction, whereas a T end indicates an inhibitory effect. The central role played by phytohormone Abscisic acid (ABA) and Auxin in imparting drought tolerance. Phytohormone ABA has strong synergistic effects on Jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent defenses, while JA promotes ABA-mediated stomatal closure and leaf senescence, but not root growth. Dashed arrows indicate the mixed effects of ethylene (ET) on JA-dependent defenses. ABA and ET antagonize each other in numerous stress responses, but both induce leaf senescence. Gibberellic acid (GA), Salicylic acid (SA), and Brassinosteroids (BRs) positively regulate auxin signaling, thereby promoting root growth for higher water uptake and survival in response to osmotic stress. Cytokinin (CKs) positively regulates auxin signaling, thereby promoting primary root growth via Type A-ARRs at low Auxin concentration, while it negatively regulates auxin signaling via Type B-ARRs at higher auxin concentration.
Abscisic acid (ABA) is the key stress hormone that has a synergistic effect on primary root elongation, lateral root development, and branching (Yadav et al., 2025). In roots, the interplay between ABA signaling and the modulation of auxin biosynthesis and transport is responsible for minimizing water loss and maximizing water acquisition (Lamers et al., 2020). Water deficit leads to an increase in the concentration of cellular ABA, which binds to PYR/PYL receptors. This leads to a decrease in auxin concentration and thereby inhibition of lateral root growth (Bloch et al., 2019). ABA has been shown to positively regulate hydrotropism and hydropatterning of RSA (Dietrich et al., 2017; Dinneny, 2019). Miao et al. (2021) demonstrated that under osmotic stresses, ABA promotes hydrotropism by inhibiting PP2C phosphatase activity, thus promoting apoplastic H+ efflux via H+-ATPase2.
Stress-induced ABA flux regulates different components of RSA in various plant species. In the model legume Medicago truncatula, ABA plays a crucial role in maintaining the function of the root meristem (Liang et al., 2007), while in Arabidopsis, it stimulates the quiescence of the undifferentiated cells at the root tip and inhibits stem cell differentiation in the primary root meristem (Zhang et al., 2010). Tomato mutants lacking ABA exhibited significantly limited RSA under drought stress conditions (Zhang et al., 2022). Furthermore, ABA accumulation was positively correlated with decreased matric potential and turgor pressure in root growth zones of maize (Spollen et al., 2000). The regulation of primary root ontogeny in maize, alongside the spatial differentiation of cells within the wheat root apex, is fundamentally governed by ABA-mediated signalling in response to drought stress (Kang et al., 2022).
Phytohormone auxin plays a pivotal role in regulating the signal response to osmotic stress, triggering the growth and development of primary and lateral roots. Auxin primarily governs root development, centrally affecting cell elongation, differentiation, apical dominance, and varied environmental tropisms (Iqbal et al., 2022). Extensive studies on the role of auxin signalling preceding lateral root primordia formation, translating to lateral root initiation, growth, and elongation, have been reported in Arabidopsis (De Smet et al., 2007; Möller et al., 2017; Van Norman et al., 2013). Auxin has been shown to promote root branching under drought stress in tobacco (Wang et al., 2017). A higher concentration gradient of auxin in root tips and its polar movement regulate root hair genesis and elongation. However, auxin-mediated hydrotropism varies among plant species. Auxin positively regulates hydrotropism in rice, cucumber, and pea (Nakajima et al., 2017), whereas it acts as an antagonist compound enhancing hydrotropic response in Arabidopsis (Chang et al., 2019). Cytokinin (CKs) and auxin are two pivotal phytohormones that regulate root growth and development. Although their outcomes are frequently conflicting, their intricate crosstalk exerts both antagonistic and synergistic effects on root growth and development. CKs are integral components in various physiological processes, including cell division, shoot growth, and delaying senescence. CKs influence RSA by altering root morphology and metabolic activities in response to limited water availability growth regimes (Pospíšilová et al., 2016). Further, CKs are found to regulate the elongation of primary roots and the initiation of lateral roots in Arabidopsis. However, CKs are also known to negatively inhibit RSA development. Lower endogenous CKs in roots correlate with improved root architecture, elevated lateral root proliferation, and enhanced nutrient assimilation (Nehnevajova et al., 2019). However, drought stress induces increased cellular CK levels, leading to better root growth in overexpression lines than in non-transformed WT plants (Xu et al., 2016).
Ethylene, a gaseous hormone, links environmental stimuli to plant developmental adaptations by modulating cellular growth in the root apical meristem. This regulation is achieved through a synergistic crosstalk where ethylene promotes auxin biosynthesis and its transport to the epidermis. This hormonal convergence triggers the transcriptional activation of root-hair-specific genes, thereby driving hair initiation and elongation. This coordinated response maximizes the root surface area for resource acquisition under stress (Vissenberg et al., 2020). Further, the exogenous application of NAA (synthetic auxin) and ACC (ethylene precursor) (Muday et al., 2012) reinstated root hair formation. The ethylene signal typically mediates RSA plasticity to confer tolerance during osmotic stressors. Ethylene biosynthesis, coupled with K+ transport, governs the Na+/K+ homeostasis, controlling cellular expansion and lateral root morphogenesis in response to osmotic stress (Osakabe et al., 2013). Ethylene and ABA frequently interact synergistically, wherein an elevated ABA concentration in roots suppresses ethylene production, which in turn facilitates increased primary root length plasticity (Kang et al., 2022).
Jasmonic acid (JA) significantly modulates root architecture by balancing primary and secondary growth. While JA acts as a potent inhibitor of primary root elongation and meristematic activity, it serves as a positive regulator of lateral root formation Chen et al., 2011; Gutierrez et al., 2012; Lakehal and Bellini, 2019; Cai et al., 2014). Additionally, the exogenous application of JA to the hydroponic root culture in tomatoes caused inhibition of primary root growth, root diameter, and bulged root tips. Most of the processes are often coordinated with auxin signaling. The convergence of these distinct signaling pathways into integrated hormonal networks is fundamental to orchestrating the plant’s adaptive response to drought. Rather than operating in isolation, these networks function as a centralized regulatory circuit that balances growth and coordinates subterranean resource acquisition. Deciphering the spatial and temporal dynamics of these multi-hormonal nodes wherein ABA, auxin, and ethylene pathways intersect is essential for engineering resilient root ideotypes that maintain productivity under fluctuating soil water potentials.
4.2 Genetic regulation of RSA
The genetic regulation of root architecture is a critical factor in enabling plants to adapt and mitigate the negative effects of abiotic stresses. The present section summarizes the key genetic mechanisms underlying the shaping of RSA in normal and drought environments. Root cells can regulate a wide range of molecular responses in enduring unfavourable environmental cues. Several investigations have been conducted to elucidate the role of RSA, utilizing the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana along with cereals like rice, wheat, and maize. We have presented a regulatory network of key genes and QTLs regulating RSA under drought stress (Figure 4). This model hierarchically organizes the identified loci according to their functional roles in stress perception, phytohormone-mediated signalling, and genomic structural control, thereby illustrating the mechanism of adaptive root plasticity under drought. The details of stress-responsive genes affecting RSA through phytohormone-mediated signaling pathways for drought stress response in different crop plants are presented in Table 4. Numerous genes primarily belonging to NAC, AUX/IAA, WRKY, AP2/ERF, and MYB families were found to be differentially expressed under drought stress in the roots of rice (Abdirad et al., 2022). The fundamental regulatory mechanism governing RSA pivotally involves auxin signaling. Auxin transcriptionally regulates the differentiation of distal stem cells at all developmental stages and growth conditions involving the transcription factors PLETHORA (PLTs) and the homeodomain transcription factor WUSCHEL RELATED HOMEOBOX 5 (WOX5) (Drisch and Stahl, 2015). The intrinsic cellular concentration of auxin is governed by tryptophan-independent and dependent pathways (Mano and Nemoto, 2012), leading to the synthesis of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), the primary natural auxin. In response to a low auxin gradient, AUX/IAA proteins bind to Auxin Response Factor (ARF) modules, leading to negative regulation of auxin response genes (Abel et al., 1995). While under high auxin concentration, AUX/IAA proteins undergo degradation by SCFTIR E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. SUMOylated ARF7 transcription factor enhances its interaction with its repressor IAA3 (indole-3-acetic acid, which in turn induces expression of LBD16, causing inhibition of lateral root initiation under the moisture-deprived root growth zones (Orosa-Puente et al., 2018). The polar auxin transport under gravistimulation is governed by the PIN-FORMED (PIN) transporter protein family. The movement of auxin is facilitated by the auxin influx carrier AUX1 and the auxin efflux carrier PIN2, mobilizing auxin to the lateral root cap and the elongation zone. Under drought-simulated conditions, ABA regulates the expression of PIN1 and PIN2; thus, increased auxin gradient inhibits root elongation in Arabidopsis, resulting in the gravitropic curvature of the root cap. However, a mutation in the negative gravitropic response (NGR), a plasma membrane protein, leads to the reversal of auxin flow and polarity of PIN proteins in ngr mutant lines (Ge and Chen, 2019). Further, overexpression of OsYUCCA1, the gene responsible for auxin biosynthesis, resulted in an increased number of lateral roots, root hairs, and crown roots in rice (Yamamoto et al., 2007). The availability of auxin-transport mutants in crop plants (Forestan and Varotto, 2012) provides an opportunity to test the physiological significance of these processes in mediating root growth in drying soil. Further, overexpression of OsAUX1 in rice (Zhao et al., 2016) exhibited precocious lateral root development under drought stress. A WUSCHEL-related homeobox gene: PagWOX11/12a, promoted root elongation in response to water stress (Wang et al., 2020). The DEEPER ROOTING 1 (DRO1) gene and its orthologs govern root system architecture by orienting root growth toward a steeper angle, a process fundamentally driven by the modulation of gravitropic set-point angles (GSA). In rice, DRO1 is expressed in the root meristem and negatively regulated by auxin; its presence alters the distribution of auxin in the root tip, increasing the downward curvature (gravitropism) of the seminal roots (Uga et al., 2013; Kitomi et al., 2020). This ‘deeper rooting’ phenotype is achieved because DRO1 shifts the GSA, causing roots to perceive and respond to gravity more acutely, thereby prioritizing vertical elongation over lateral expansion. Similarly, qSOR1, a DRO1 ortholog, maintains auxin gradients in the root cap to regulate soil-surface rooting, demonstrating that the IGT gene family dictates the vertical versus horizontal distribution of the root mass (Waite et al., 2020). Beyond gravitropism, deeper rooting is further enhanced by hydrotropism, where the ABA-signaling cascade and MIZ1 trigger an asymmetric distribution of Ca2+ and cytokinin. This hormonal asymmetry induces differential cell elongation in the root cortex, actively directing the root tip toward deeper, moisture-rich soil layers (Tanaka-Takada et al., 2019; Chang et al., 2019). A high rate of allelic variations in the OsMIZ1 gene has been identified specifically in indica rice. Further, higher gene expression levels positively correlated with the drought-tolerant genotypes in rice (Kaur et al., 2020). Like miz1, the miz2 mutants exhibit similar phenology and root gravitropism (Miyazawa et al., 2009). Moreover, Arabidopsis mutants with cytokinin response defects showed increased root branching, leading to a higher survival rate under drought stress (Mason et al., 2005; Riefler et al., 2006; To and Kieber, 2008). A key regulator of the ethylene signaling pathway, Ethylene response factors (ERFs), particularly ERF2, are known to regulate embryonic root growth through the modulation of cellular ethylene and ABA. Underlying Jasmonic acid signalling in response to drought stress, sensed by CORONATINE INSENSITIVE1 (COI1)– JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN (JAZ) co-receptor, along with basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factors MYC2, MYC3, and MYC4, inhibits primary root growth. Contrarily, bHLH transcription factors (bHLH3 and bHLH17) bind to JAZ proteins, which subsequently block the inhibition of root growth that is usually mediated by jasmonate (Han et al., 2023). Further, JAZ proteins antagonize the ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE (RHD6) and RHD6 LIKE1 (RSL1) transcription factors, regulating the jasmonate-induced extension of root hair growth (Han et al., 2020). Moreover, upregulation of the JIOsPR10 (Jasmonic acid inducible pathogenesis-related class 10) gene was found to be involved in root growth and development in Oryza sativa by activating stress-related proteins (Wu et al., 2016). In addition, EXPB7 (He et al., 2015) and WOX11 (Cheng et al., 2016) regulate root hair formation, thereby contributing significantly to increased drought resistance. The overexpression of Triptychon (TRY) transcription factors from the halophyte Limonium bicolor in Arabidopsis suggested their function in the pathway for salt-triggered root hair development (Leng et al., 2020). In Maize, overexpression of ZmTIP1, an S-acyltransferase encoding gene, regulates root hair length and enhances drought tolerance (Zhang et al., 2020a). However, GLABRA2 TF negatively regulates root hair growth under osmotic stress (Wang et al., 2020). Overexpression of the OsNAC045 transcription factor (crucial for lateral root development) exhibited enhanced survival capacity following exposure to both drought and salt conditions (Zheng et al., 2009), while overexpression of OsNAC10 under transcriptional control of a root-specific promoter exhibited enhanced yield and survival compared with non-transformed plants in response to drought stress (Jeong et al., 2010). Rice transgenics were found to possess improved root growth and drought tolerance through the integration of BRX (BREVIS RADIX-like) (Liu et al., 2010a), OsVP1(H+ pyrophosphatase in tonoplasts) and OsNHX1 genes (Na+/H+ exchangers) (Liu et al., 2010b). Deciphering the molecular interplay underlying RSA holds significant potential for securing crop productivity despite varied rhizosphere environments and stress exposures.
Figure 4. Hierarchical coordination of phytohormonal signaling and genetic determinants governing root adaptation to drought stress.
Table 4. Stress-responsive genes altering root traits through phytohormone-mediated signaling pathways conferring drought tolerance in different crop plants.
4.3 QTL association and marker-assisted selection
Numerous investigations across diverse plant species have identified several Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) associated with the genetic regulation of RSA under moisture-deficient environments (Supplementary Table 2). These research findings have played a crucial role in advancing understanding for designing environment-specific root systems (Yadav et al., 2020; 2024a, 2024b). For instance, a major-effect QTL for root depth on rice chromosome 9 remains a primary target for improving yield under water-limiting conditions (Steele et al., 2006, 2007). Central to this regulation is the DEEPER ROOTING 1 (DRO1) locus; functional validation of Dro1-near-isogenic lines (NILs) confirms that this locus optimizes root growth angle to facilitate deep-soil water acquisition, thereby maintaining grain filling and reducing seed sterility under drought (Uga et al., 2013; Kitomi et al., 2020). These improvements are specifically attributed to vertical root distribution rather than shifts in other morphological traits (Arai-Sanoh et al., 2014). Furthermore, overlapping QTLs for root development, water-use efficiency, and nutrient absorption—including those regulating ABA-induced lateral root inhibition in Arabidopsis (Fitz et al., 2006; Xiong et al., 2006) underscore the pleiotropic nature of RSA in determining crop productivity (Johnson et al., 2000; Tuberosa et al., 2002). Despite these discoveries, the low heritability and high QTL × Environment (Q×E) interactions of root traits have historically limited their successful introgression. To resolve this, current research has shifted toward Meta-QTL (MQTL) analysis, which identifies stable, high-confidence genomic regions across varying genetic backgrounds and stress intensities (Selamat and Nadarajah, 2021; Kumar et al., 2020). Moreover, the integration of haplotype-based breeding and Genomic Selection (GS), supported by high-throughput phenotyping, now enables the simultaneous selection of minor-effect loci, thereby moving beyond the limitations of single-marker MAS (Sinha et al., 2023). Consequently, fine-mapping these stable MQTLs and identifying candidate genes remains pivotal for precision breeding of climate-smart varieties.
5 Conclusion and future perspectives
Research into root system architecture (RSAs) faces critical barriers that limit the translation of genetic insights into climate-resilient crops. Understanding and harnessing deep soil-based resources could be instrumental in attaining sustainable crop productivity in varied extreme growth environments. Significant progress has been made in understanding the functioning of different root traits in water acquisition by plants, and several root-specific QTLs have been identified, but defining an ideal RSA under a target environment still remains as an important challenge. The main problem remains that roots are by their nature difficult to phenotype in a non-destructive way under realistic field conditions, which creates a gap between controlled laboratory findings and the application in breeding. Moreover, the lack of standardized protocols and high phenotypic variability between environments complicates cross-study comparison. However, emerging technologies based on robust and high-throughput phenotyping platforms enabling accurate and real-time measurement offer promising solutions. Further, genomic approaches focused on highly heritable traits, such as root angle, depth, and xylem anatomy, in combination with marker-assisted selection, can speed up the propagation of drought-adaptive phenotypes. Future progress requires coordinated multi-environmental studies, open phenotypic data sets, and the integration of genetic selection. The combination of advanced phenotyping, systems biology, and precision agronomy will transform RSA knowledge into stress-tolerant varieties, ultimately securing global food systems in a changing climate.
Robust and high-throughput phenotyping platforms enabling accurate and real-time measurement will help fully realize this potential and thus adaptation to water- and resource-limited environments.
Author contributions
VK: Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration. SY: Writing – original draft, Visualization. BY: Visualization, Writing – original draft. SM: Writing – original draft. MK: Writing – original draft. VC: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by funding for the project (No. BT/Ag/Network/Linseed/2019-20) from the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Director, ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (ICAR-NBPGR), New Delhi, India, and the Head, Division of Germplasm Evaluation, ICAR-NBPGR, for guidance and support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.1753086/full#supplementary-material
References
Abdirad, S., Ghaffari, M. R., Majd, A., Irian, S., Soleymaniniya, A., Daryani, P., et al. (2022). Genome-wide expression analysis of root tips in contrasting rice genotypes revealed novel candidate genes for water stress adaptation. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.792079
Abel, S., Nguyen, M. D., and Theologis, A. (1995). The PS-IAA4/5-like family of early auxin-inducible mRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Mol. Biol. 251, 533–549. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0454
Adu, M. O., Chatot, A., Wiesel, L., Bennett, M. J., Broadley, M. R., White, P. J., et al. (2014). A scanner system for high-resolution quantification of variation in root growth dynamics of Brassica rapa genotypes. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 2039–2048. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru048
Afonso, P., Castro, I., Couto, P., Leal, F., Carnide, V., Rosa, E., et al. (2025). Root phenotyping: a contribution to understanding drought stress resilience in grain legumes. Agronomy 15, 798. doi: 10.3390/agronomy15040798
Arai-Sanoh, Y., Takai, T., Yoshinaga, S., Nakano, H., Kojima, M., Sakakibara, H., et al. (2014). Deep rooting conferred by DEEPER ROOTING 1 enhances rice yield in paddy fields. Sci. Rep. 4, 5563. doi: 10.1038/srep05563
Armengaud, P., Zambaux, K., Hills, A., Sulpice, R., Pattison, R. J., Blatt, M. R., et al. (2009). EZ-Rhizo: integrated software for the fast and accurate measurement of root system architecture. Plant J. 57, 945–956. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03739.x
Arsenault, J. L., Pouleur, S., Messier, C., and Guay, R. (1995). WinRhizo, a root measuring system with a unique overlap correction method. Hortic. Sci. 30, 906. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.30.4.906D
Bai, D., Ye, L., Yang, Z., and Wang, G. (2022). Impact of climate change on agricultural productivity: a combination of spatial Durbin model and entropy approaches. Int. J. Clim. Change Strateg. Manage. 16, 26–48. doi: 10.1108/IJCCSM-02-2022-0016
Basu, P. and Pal, A. (2012). A new tool for analysis of root growth in the spatio-temporal continuum. New Phytol. 195, 264–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04149.x
Basu, P., Pal, A., Lynch, J. P., and Brown, K. M. (2007). A novel image-analysis technique for kinematic study of growth and curvature. Plant Physiol. 145, 305–316. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.103226
Bello, E. B., Wang, L., Patil, S. B., Rajurkar, A. B., Funaro, L., Echegoyen, K., et al. (2025). RootXplorer: A computer vision-based 3D phenotyping platform for high-throughput quantification and spatio-temporal analysis of root system penetrability. Plant Phenomics 7, 100143. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphe.2025.100143
Bengough, A. G., Gordon, D. C., Al-Menaie, H., Ellis, R. P., Allan, D., Keith, R., et al. (2004). Gel observation chamber for rapid screening of root traits in cereal seedlings. Plant Soil 262, 63–70. doi: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000037029.82618.27
Bloch, D., Puli, M. R., Mosquna, A., and Yalovsky, S. (2019). Abiotic stress modulates root patterning via ABA-regulated microRNA expression in the endodermis initials. Development 146, dev177097. doi: 10.1242/dev.177097
Bucksch, A., Burridge, J., York, L. M., Das, A., Nord, E., Weitz, J. S., et al. (2014). Image-based high-throughput field phenotyping of crop roots. Plant Physiol. 166, 470–486. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.243519
Cai, X. T., Xu, P., Zhao, P. X., Liu, R., Yu, L. H., and Xiang, C. B. (2014). Arabidopsis ERF109 mediates cross-talk between jasmonic acid and auxin biosynthesis during lateral root formation. Nat. Commun. 5, 5833. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6833
Cassab, G. I., Delfeena, E., and Campos, M. E. (2013). Root hydrotropism: an update. Am. J. Bot. 100, 1–11. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1200306
Chang, J., Li, X., Fu, W., Wang, J., Yong, Y., Shi, H., et al. (2019). Asymmetric distribution of cytokinins determines root hydrotropism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell Res. 29, 984–993. doi: 10.1038/s41422-019-0239-3
Chapman, N., Whalley, W. R., Lindsey, K., and Miller, A. J. (2011). Water supply and not nitrate concentration determines primary root growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 34, 1630–1638. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02358.x
Chen, Y. L., Dunbabin, V. M., Diggle, A. J., Siddique, K. H. M., and Rengel, Z. (2011). Development of a novel semi hydroponic phenotyping system for studying root architecture. Funct. Plant Biol. 38, 355–363. doi: 10.1071/fp10241
Chen, Y., Han, Y., Zhang, M., Zhou, S., Kong, X., and Wang, W. (2016). Overexpression of the wheat expansin gene TaEXPA2 improved seed production and drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco plants. PloS One 11, e0153494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153494
Cheng, S., Zhou, D. X., and Zhao, Y. (2016). WUSCHEL-related homeobox gene WOX11 increases rice drought resistance by controlling root hair formation and root system development. Plant Signal Behav. 11, e1130198. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2015.1130198
Clark, R. T., Famoso, A. N., Zhao, K., Shaff, J. E., Craft, E. J., Bustamante, C. D., et al. (2013). High-throughput two-dimensional root system phenotyping platform facilitates genetic analysis of root growth and development. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 454–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02587.x
Clark, R. T., MacCurdy, R. B., Jung, J. K., Shaff, J. E., McCouch, S. R., Aneshansley, D. J., et al. (2011). Three-dimensional root phenotyping with a novel imaging and software platform. Plant Physiol. 156, 455–465. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.169102
Cseresnyés, I., Rajkai, K., Szitár, K., Radimszky, L., Onodi, G., and Dulay, G. K. (2020). Root capacitance measurements allow non-intrusive in-situ monitoring of the seasonal dynamics and drought response of root activity in two grassland species. Plant Soil 449, 423–437. doi: 10.1007/s11104-020-04505-4
Datta, S., Kim, C. M., Pernas, M., Pires, N. D., Proust, H., Tam, T., et al. (2011). Root hairs: development, growth and evolution at the plant–soil interface. Plant Soil 346, 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-0845-4
de Dorlodot, S., Forster, B., Pagès, L., Price, A., Tuberosa, R., and Draye, X. (2007). Root system architecture: opportunities and constraints for genetic improvement of crops. Trends Plant Sci. 12, 474–481. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.08.012
Delgado, A., Hays, D. B., Burton, R. K., Ceballos, H., Novo, A., Boi, E., et al. (2017). Ground penetrating radar: a case study for estimating root bulking rate in Cassava. Plant Methods 13, 65. doi: 10.1186/s13007-017-0216-0
De Smet, I., Tetsumura, T., De Rybel, B., Frey, N. F. D., Laplaze, L., Casimiro, I., et al. (2007). Auxin-dependent regulation of lateral root positioning in the basal meristem of Arabidopsis. Development 134, 681–690. doi: 10.1242/dev.02753
Devienne-Barret, F., Richard-Molard, C., Chelle, M., Maury, O., and Ney, B. (2006). Ara-Rhizotron: an effective culture system to study simultaneously root and shoot development of Arabidopsis. Plant Soil 280, 253–266. doi: 10.1007/s11104-005-3224-1
Dietrich, D., Pang, L., Kobayashi, A., Fozard, J. A., Boudolf, V., Bhosale, R., et al. (2017). Root hydrotropism is controlled via a cortex-specific growth mechanism. Nat. Plants 3, 17057. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2017.57
Dinneny, J. R. (2019). Developmental responses to water and salinity in root systems. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 35, 239–257. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100617-062949
Downie, H., Holden, N., Otten, W., Spiers, A. J., Valentine, T. A., and Dupuy, L. X. (2012). Transparent soil for imaging the rhizosphere. PloS One 7, e44276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044276
Drisch, R. C. and Stahl, Y. (2015). Function and regulation of transcription factors involved in root apical meristem and stem cell maintenance. Front. Plant Sci. 6. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00505
Du, H., Wu, N., Fu, J., Wang, S., Li, X., Xiao, J., et al. (2012). A GH3 family member, OsGH3-2, modulates auxin and abscisic acid levels and differentially affects drought and cold tolerance in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 6467–6480. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers300
Duncan, K. E., Czymmek, K. J., Jiang, N., Thies, A. C., and Topp, C. N. (2022). X-ray microscopy enables multiscale high-resolution 3D imaging of plant cells, tissues, and organs. Plant Physiol. 188, 831–845. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab405
Eapen, D., Barroso, M. L., Campos, M. E., Ponce, G., Corkidi, G., Dubrovsky, J. G., et al. (2003). A no hydrotropic response root mutant that responds positively to gravitropism in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 131, 536–546. doi: 10.1104/pp.011841
Eapen, D., Barroso, M. L., Ponce, G., Campos, M. E., and Cassab, G. I. (2005). Hydrotropism: root growth responses to water. Trends Plants Sci. 10, 44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.11.004
Emons, A. M. C. and Ketelaar, T. (2009). “Root hairs,” in Plant Cell Monographs, vol. 12 . Ed. Chaffey, N. (Ann Bot Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 7. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp083
Fang, S., Yan, X., and Liao, H. (2009). 3D reconstruction and dynamic modeling of root architecture in situ and its application to crop phosphorus research. Plant J. 60, 1096–1108. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.04009.x
Fitz, G. J. N., Lehti-Shiu, M. D., Ingram, P. A., Deak, K. I., Biesiada, T., and Malamy, J. E. (2006). Identification of quantitative trait loci that regulate Arabidopsis root system size and plasticity. Genetics 172, 485–498. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.047555
Flavel, R. J., Guppy, C. N., Tighe, M., Watt, M., McNeill, A., and Young, L. M. (2012). Non-destructive quantification of cereal roots in soil using high-resolution X-ray tomography. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 2503–2511. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err421
Forestan, C. and Varotto, S. (2012). The role of PIN auxin efflux carriers in polar auxin transport and accumulation and their effect on shaping maize development. Mol. Plant 5, 787–798. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssr103
French, A., Ubeda-Tomas, S., Holman, T. J., Bennett, M. J., and Pridmore, T. (2009). High-throughput quantification of root growth using a novel image- analysis tool. Plant Physiol. 150, 1784–1795. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.140558
Fujii, N., Miyabayashi, S., Sugita, T., Kobayashi, A., Yamazaki, C., Miyazawa, Y., et al. (2018). Root-tip-mediated inhibition of hydrotropism is accompanied with the suppression of asymmetric expression of auxin-inducible genes in response to moisture gradients in cucumber roots. PloS One 13, e0189827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189827
Galkovskyi, T., Mileyko, Y., Bucksch, A., Moore, B., Symonava, O., Price, C. A., et al. (2012). GiA Roots: software for the high throughput analysis of plant root system architecture. BMC Plant Biol. 12, 116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-116
Gao, J., Zhao, Y., Zhao, Z., Liu, W., Jiang, C., Li, J., et al. (2023). RRS1 shapes robust root system to enhance drought resistance in rice. New Phytol. 238, 1146–1162. doi: 10.1111/nph.18775
Ge, L. and Chen, R. (2019). Negative gravitropic response of roots directs auxin flow to control root gravitropism. Plant Cell Environ. 42, 2372–2383. doi: 10.1111/pce.13559
Geng, Y., Wu, R., Wee, C. W., Xie, F., Wei, X., Chan, P. M. Y., et al. (2013). A spatio-temporal understanding of growth regulation during the salt stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25, 2132–2154. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.112896
Gilroy, S. and Jones, D. L. (2000). Through form to function: root hair development and nutrient uptake. Trends Plant Sci. 5, 56–60. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(99)01551-4
Giulani, S., Sanguineti, M. C., Tuberosa, R., Bellotti, M., Salvi, S., and Landi, P. (2005). Root-ABA1, a major constitutive QTL, affects maize root architecture and leaf ABA concentration at different water regimes. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 3061–3070. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri303
Gowda, V. R. P., Henry, A., Yamauchi, A., Shashidhar, H. E., and Serraj, R. (2011). Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice. Field Crops Res. 122, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.03.001
Gregory, P. J. (1979). A periscope method for observation root growth and distribution in field soil. J. Exp. Bot. 30, 205–214. doi: 10.1093/jxb/30.1.205
Gregory, P. J., Hutchison, D. J., Read, D. B., Jenneson, P. M., Gilboy, W. B., and Morton, E. J. (2003). Non-invasive imaging of roots with high resolution X-ray micro-tomography. Plant Soil 255, 351–359. doi: 10.1023/A:1026179919689
Guet, J., Fichot, R., Lédée, C., Laurans, F., Cochard, H., Delzon, S., et al. (2015). Stem xylem resistance to cavitation is related to xylem structure but not to growth and water-use efficiency at the within-population level in Populus nigra L. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 4643–4652. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv232
Gupta, S., Mishra, S. K., Misra, S., Pandey, V., Agrawal, L., Nautiyal, C. S., et al. (2020). Revealing the complexity of protein abundance in chickpea root under drought stress using a comparative proteomics approach. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 151, 88–102. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.03.005
Gutierrez, L., Mongelard, G., Floková, K., Păcurar, D. I., Novák, O., Staswick, P., et al. (2012). Auxin controls Arabidopsis adventitious root initiation by regulating jasmonic acid homeostasis. Plant Cell 24, 2515–2527. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.099119
Han, X., Kui, M., He, K., Yang, M., Du, J., Jiang, Y., et al. (2023). Jasmonate-regulated root growth inhibition and root hair elongation. J. Exp. Bot. 74, 1176–1185. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac441
Han, Y. Y., Li, A. X., Li, F., Zhao, M. R., and Wang, W. (2012). Characterization of a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) expansin gene, TaEXPB23, involved in the abiotic stress response and phytohormone regulation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 54, 49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.02.007
Han, X., Zhang, M., Yang, M., and Hu, Y. (2020). Arabidopsis JAZ proteins interact with and suppress RHD6 transcription factor to regulate jasmonate-stimulated root hair development. Plant Cell 32, 1049–1062. doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00617
Harrison, M. T. (2021). Climate change benefits negated by extreme heat. Nat. Food 2, 855–856. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00387-6
He, X., Zeng, J., Cao, F., Ahmed, I. M., Zhang, G., Vincze, E., et al. (2015). HvEXPB7, a novel β-expansin gene revealed by the root hair transcriptome of Tibetan wild barley, improves root hair growth under drought stress. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 7405–7419. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv436
Heeraman, D. A., Hopmans, J. W., and Clausnitzer, V. (1997). Three-dimensional imaging of plant roots in situ with X-ray computed tomography. Plant Soil 189, 167–179. doi: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000009694.64377.6f
Henry, A., Cal, A. J., Batoto, T. C., Torres, R. O., and Serraj, R. (2012). Root attributes affecting water uptake of rice (Oryza sativa) under drought. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 4751–4763. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers150
Henry, A., Gowda, V. R. P., Torres, R. O., McNally, K. L., and Serraj, R. (2011). Variation in root system architecture and drought response in rice (Oryza sativa): phenotyping of the OryzaSNP panel in rainfed lowland fields. Field Crops Res. 120, 205–214. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.10.003
Hernández, E. I., Vilagrosa, A., Pausas, J. G., and Bellot, J. (2010). Morphological traits and water use strategies in seedlings of Mediterranean coexisting species. Plant Ecol. 207, 233–244. doi: 10.1007/s11258-009-9668-2
Hetz, W., Hochholdinger, F., Schwall, M., and Feix, G. (1996). Isolation and characterization of rtcs, a mutant deficient in the formation of nodal roots. Plant J. 10, 845–857. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.10050845.x
Hund, A., Ruta, N., and Liedgens, M. (2009). Rooting depth and water use efficiency of tropical maize inbred lines, differing in drought tolerance. Plant Soil 318, 311–325. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9843-6
Iqbal, S., Wang, X., Mubeen, I., Kamran, M., Kanwal, I., Díaz, G. A., et al. (2022). Phytohormones trigger drought tolerance in crop plants: Outlook and future perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 3378. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.799318
Iyer-Pascuzzi, A. S., Symonova, O., Mileyko, Y., Hao, Y., Belcher, H., Harer, J., et al. (2010). Imaging and analysis platform for automatic phenotyping and trait ranking of plant root systems. Plant Physiol. 152, 1148–1157. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.150748
Jahnke, S., Menzel, M. I., van Dusschoten, D., Roeb, G. W., Bühler, J., Minwuyelet, S., et al. (2009). Combined MRI–PET dissects dynamic changes in plant structures and functions. Plant J. 59, 634–644. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.03888.x
Jeong, J., Kim, Y. S., Baek, K., Jung, H., Ha, S., Choi, Y. D., et al. (2010). Root-specific expression of OsNAC10 improves drought tolerance and grain yield in rice under field drought conditions. Plant Physiol. 153, 185–197. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.154773
Johnson, W. C., Jackson, L. E., Ochoa, O., van Wijk, R., Peleman, J., St Clair, D. A., et al. (2000). Lettuce, a shallow-rooted crop, and Lactuca serriola, its wild progenitor, differ at QTL determining root architecture and deep soil water exploitation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101, 1066–1073. doi: 10.1007/s001220051581
Johnson, M. G., Tingey, D. T., Phillips, D. L., and Storm, M. J. (2001). Advancing fine root research with minirhizotrons. Environ. Exp. Bot. 45, 263–289. doi: 10.1016/s0098-8472(01)00077-6
Jones, J. B. (1982). Hydroponics: its history and use in plant nutrition studies. J. Plant Nutr. 5, 1003–1030. doi: 10.1080/01904168209363035
Kaneyasu, T., Kobayashi, A., Nakayama, M., Fujii, N., Takahashi, H., and Miyazawa, Y. (2007). Auxin response, but not its polar transport, plays a role in hydrotropism of Arabidopsis roots. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 1143–1150. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl274
Kang, J., Peng, Y., and Xu, W. (2022). Crop root responses to drought stress: molecular mechanisms, nutrient regulations, and interactions with microorganisms in the rhizosphere. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 9310. doi: 10.3390/ijms23169310
Kashiwagi, J., Krishnamurthy, L., Purushothaman, R., Upadhyaya, H. D., Gaur, P. M., Gowda, C. L. L., et al. (2015). Scope for improvement of yield under drought through the root traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Field Crops Res. 170, 47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.10.003
Kato, M., Aoyama, T., and Maeshima, M. (2013). The Ca2+-binding protein PCaP2 located on the plasma membrane is involved in root hair development as a possible signal transducer. Plant J. 74, 690–700. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12155
Kaur, V. and Behl, R. K. (2010). Grain yield in wheat as affected by short periods of high temperature, drought and their interaction during pre- and post-anthesis stages. Cereal Res. Commun. 38, 514–520. doi: 10.1556/CRC.38.2010.4.8
Kaur, V., Behl, R. K., Singh, S., and Madaan, S. (2011). Endosperm and pericarp size in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grains developed under high temperature and drought stress conditions. Cereal Res. Commun. 39, 515–524. doi: 10.1556/CRC.39.2011.4.6
Kaur, V., Madaan, S., and Behl, R. K. (2017). ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase activity in relation to yield potential of wheat: Response to independent and combined high temperature and drought stress. Cereal Res. Commun. 45, 181–191. doi: 10.1556/0806.45.2017.003
Kaur, V., Payasi, D. K., Choudhary, R., Kumar, V., Yadav, S. K., Singh, D., et al. (2024). Genetic resources for enhancing drought tolerance from National Genebank collection of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) in India. Plant Soil 510, 923–946. doi: 10.1007/s11104-024-06966-3
Kaur, V., Yadav, S. K., Wankhede, D. P., Pulivendula, P., Kumar, A., and Chinnusamy, V. (2020). Cloning and characterization of a gene encoding MIZ1, a domain of unknown function protein and its role in salt and drought stress in rice. Protoplasma 257, 475–487. doi: 10.1007/s00709-019-01452-5
Ke, Q., Wang, Z., Ji, C. Y., Jeong, J. C., Lee, H. S., Li, H., et al. (2015). Transgenic poplar expressing Arabidopsis YUCCA6 exhibits auxin-overproduction phenotypes and increased tolerance to abiotic stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 94, 19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.05.003
Kim, W., Iizumi, T., and Nishimori, M. (2019). Global patterns of crop production losses associated with droughts from 1983 to 2009. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 58, 1233–1244. doi: 10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0174.1
Kirkegaard, J. A., Lilley, J. M., Howe, G. N., and Graham, J. M. (2007). Impact of subsoil water use on wheat yield. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 58, 303–315. doi: 10.1071/AR06285
Kitomi, Y., Hanzawa, E., Kuya, N., Inoue, H., Hara, N., Kawai, S., et al. (2020). Root angle modifications by the DRO1 homolog improve rice yields in saline paddy fields. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 21242–21250. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2005911117
Kobayashi, A., Takahashi, A., Kakimoto, Y., Miyazawa, Y., Fujii, N., Higashitani, A., et al. (2007). A gene essential for hydrotropism in roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 4724–4729. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609929104
Kumar, P., Huang, C., Cai, J., and Miklavcic, S. J. (2014). Root phenotyping by root tip detection and classification through statistical learning. Plant Soil 380, 193–209. doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2071-3
Kumar, A., Saripalli, G., Jan, I., Kumar, K., Sharma, P. K., Balyan, H. S., et al. (2020). Meta-QTL analysis and identification of candidate genes for drought tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 30, 1713–1725. doi: 10.1007/s12298-020-00847-6
Lakehal, A. and Bellini, C. (2019). Control of adventitious root formation: insights into synergistic and antagonistic hormonal interactions. Physiol. Plant 165, 90–100. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12823
Lamers, J., van der Meer, T., and Testerink, C. (2020). How plants sense and respond to stressful environments. Plant Physiol. 182, 1624–1635. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.01464
Laur, J. and Hacke, U. G. (2013). Transpirational demand affects aquaporin expression in poplar roots. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 2283–2293. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert096
Le Bot, J., Serra, V., Fabre, J., Draye, X., Adamowicz, S., and Pages, L. (2010). DART:a software to analyse root system architecture and development from captured images. Plant Soil 326, 261–273. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0005-2
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., and Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444. doi: 10.1038/nature14539
Leitner, D., Felderer, B., Vontobel, P., and Schnepf, A. (2014). Recovering root system traits using image analysis exemplified by two-dimensional neutron radiography images of lupine. Plant Physiol. 164, 24–35. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.227892
Le Marié, C., Kirchgessner, N., Flütsch, P., Pfeifer, J., Walter, A., and Hund, A. (2016). RADIX: rhizoslide platform allowing high throughput digital image analysis of root system expansion. Plant Methods 12, 1–15. doi: 10.1186/s13007-016-0140-8
Leng, B., Wang, X., Yuan, F., Zhang, H., Lu, C., Chen, M., et al. (2020). Heterologous expression of the Limonium bicolor MYB transcription factor LbTRY in Arabidopsis thaliana increases salt sensitivity by modifying root hair development and osmotic homeostasis. Plant Sci. 302, 110704. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110704
Li, N., Han, X., Feng, D., Yuan, D., and Huang, L. J. (2019). Signaling crosstalk between salicylic acid and ethylene/jasmonate in plant defense: do we understand what they are whispering? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 671. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030671
Li, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Hao, L., Hua, J., Duan, L., et al. (2013). Expression of an Arabidopsis molybdenum cofactor sulphurase gene in soybean enhances drought tolerance and increases yield under field conditions. Plant Biotechnol. J. 11, 747–758. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12066
Liang, Y., Mitchell, D. M., and Harris, J. M. (2007). Abscisic acid rescues the root meristem defects of the Medicago truncatula latd mutant. Dev. Biol. 304, 297–307. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.12.037
Libault, M., Brechenmacher, L., Cheng, J., Xu, D., and Stacey, G. (2010). Root hair systems biology. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 641–650. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.010
Liu, S., Barrow, C. S., Hanlon, M., Lynch, J. P., and Bucksch, A. (2021). DIRT/3D: 3D root phenotyping for field-grown maize (Zea mays). Plant Physiol. 187, 739–757. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab311
Liu, J., Liang, D., Song, Y., and Xiong, L. (2010a). Systematic identification and expression analysis of BREVIS RADIX-like homologous genes in rice. Plant Sci. 178, 183–191. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.11.009
Liu, S., Zheng, L., Xue, Y., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., and Shou, H. (2010b). Overexpression of OsVP1 and OsNHX1 increases tolerance to drought and salinity in rice. J. Plant Biol. 53, 444–452. doi: 10.1007/s12374-010-9135-6
Lo, S. F., Ho, T. H. D., Liu, Y. L., Jiang, M. J., Hsieh, K. T., Chen, K. T., et al. (2017). Ectopic expression of specific GA2 oxidase mutants promotes yield and stress tolerance in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 850–864. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12681
Lobet, G., Pages, L., and Draye, X. (2011). A novel image-analysis toolbox enabling quantitative analysis of root system architecture. Plant Physiol. 157, 29–39. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.179895
Lombardi, M., De Gara, L., and Loreto, F. (2021). Determinants of root system architecture for future-ready, stress-resilient crops. Physiol. Plant 172, 2090–2097. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13439
Lorenzo, H., Perez-Gracia, V., Novo, A., and Armesto, J. (2010). Forestry applications of ground-penetrating radar. For. Syst. 19, 5–17. doi: 10.5424/fs/2010191-01163
Lynch, J. (1995). Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiol. 109, 7–13. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.1.7
Lynch, J. P. (2011). Root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition: tools for future crops. Plant Physiol. 156, 1041–1049. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.175414
Lynch, J. P. (2013). Steep, cheap and deep: an ideotype to optimize water and N acquisition by maize root systems. Ann. Bot. 112, 347–357. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs293
Lynch, J. P. (2019). Root phenotypes for improved nutrient capture: an underexploited opportunity for global agriculture. New Phytol. 223, 548–564. doi: 10.1111/nph.15738
Ma, H., Liu, C., Li, Z., Ran, Q., Xie, G., Wang, B., et al. (2018). ZmbZIP4 contributes to stress resistance in maize by regulating ABA synthesis and root development. Plant Physiol. 178, 753–770. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00436
Madaan, S., Devi, S., Toky, O. P., Kaur, V., Angrish, R., Arya, S. S., et al. (2018). Lysimetric quantification of biodrainage potential of some tree species. Bioscan 13, 735–742.
Mairhofer, S., Zappala, S., Tracy, S. R., Sturrock, C., Bennett, M., Mooney, S. J., et al. (2012). RooTrak: automated recovery of three-dimensional plant root architecture in soil from x-ray microcomputed tomography images using visual tracking. Plant Physiol. 158, 561–569. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.186221
Mairhofer, S., Zappala, S., Tracy, S., Sturrock, C., Bennett, M. J., Mooney, S. J., et al. (2013). Recovering complete plant root system architectures from soil via X-ray μ-Computed Tomography. Plant Methods 9, 8. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-9-8
Manju, Kaur, V., Sharma, K. D., and Kumar, A. (2019). Identification of promising sources for drought tolerance in cultivated and wild species germplasm of barley based on root architecture. J. Environ. Biol. 40, 309–315. doi: 10.22438/jeb/40/3/MRN-995
Manju, Yadav, S. K., Wankhede, D. P., Saroha, A., Jacob, S. R., Pandey, R., et al. (2023). Screening of barley germplasm for drought tolerance based on root architecture, agronomic traits, and identification of novel allelic variants of HVA1. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 209, 705–723. doi: 10.1111/jac.12650
Mano, Y. and Nemoto, K. (2012). The pathway of auxin biosynthesis in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 2853–2872. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers091
Manschadi, A. M., Christopher, J., deVoil, P., and Hammer, G. L. (2006). The role of root architectural traits in adaptation of wheat to water-limited environments. Funct. Plant Biol. 33, 823–837. doi: 10.1071/fp06055
Mao, X., Zhang, H., Tian, S., Chang, X., and Jing, R. (2010). TaSnRK2.4, an SNF1-type serine/threonine protein kinase of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), confers enhanced multistress tolerance in. Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 683–696. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp331
Mason, M. G., Mathews, D. E., Argyros, D. A., Maxwell, B. B., Kieber, J. J., Alonso, J. M., et al. (2005). Multiple type-B response regulators mediate cytokinin signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17, 3007–3018. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.035451
Maurel, C. and Nacry, P. (2020). Root architecture and hydraulics converge for acclimation to changing water availability. Nat. Plants. 6, 744–749. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0684-5
Menzel, M. I., Oros-Peusquens, A. M., Pohlmeier, A., Shah, N. J., Schurr, U., and Schneider, H. U. (2007). Comparing 1H-NMR imaging and relaxation mapping of German white asparagus from five different cultivation sites. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 170, 24–38. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200625114
Metzner, R., Dusschoten, D., Bühler, J., Schurr, U., and Jahnke, S. (2014). Belowground plant development measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): exploiting the potential for non-invasive trait quantification using sugar beet as a proxy. Front. Plant Sci. 5. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00469
Meunier, F., Heymans, A., Draye, X., Couvreur, V., Javaux, M., and Lobet, G. (2020). MARSHAL, a novel tool for virtual phenotyping of maize root system hydraulic architectures. silico Plants 2, diz012. doi: 10.1093/insilicoplants/diz012
Miao, R., Yuan, W., Wang, Y., Garcia-Maquilon, I., Dang, X., Li, Y., et al. (2021). Low ABA concentration promotes root growth and hydrotropism through relief of ABA INSENSITIVE 1-mediated inhibition of plasma membrane H+-ATPase 2. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd4113. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd4113
Miyazawa, Y., Ito, Y., Moriwaki, T., Kobayashi, A., Fujii, N., and Takahashi, H. (2009). A molecular mechanism unique to hydrotropism in roots. Plant Sci. 177, 297–301. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.06.009
Miyazawa, Y., Sakashita, T., Funayama, T., Hamada, N., Negishi, H., and Kobayashi, A. (2008). Effects of locally targeted heavy-ion and laser microbeam on root hydrotropism in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Radiat. Res. 49, 373–379. doi: 10.1269/jrr.07131
Möller, B. K., Ten Hove, C. A., Xiang, D., Williams, N., López, L. G., Yoshida, S., et al. (2017). Auxin response cell-autonomously controls ground tissue initiation in the early Arabidopsis embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, E2533–E2539. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616493114
Morris, E. C., Griffiths, M., Golebiowska, A., Mairhofer, S., Burr-Hersey, J., Goh, T., et al. (2017). Shaping 3D root system architecture. Curr. Biol. CB 27, R919–R930. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.043
Muday, G. K., Rahman, A., and Binder, B. M. (2012). Auxin and ethylene: collaborators or competitors? Trends Plant Sci. 17, 181–195. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.02.001
Mühlich, M., Truhn, D., Nagel, K., Walter, A., Scharr, H., and Aach, T. (2008). “Measuring plant root growth,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Ed. Rigoll, G. (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg), 497–506. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69321-5_50
Nagel, K. A., Kastenholz, B., Jahnke, S., Van Dusschoten, D., Aach, T., Muhlich, M., et al. (2009). Temperature responses of roots: impact on growth, root system architecture and implications for phenotyping. Funct. Plant Biol. 36, 947–959. doi: 10.1071/fp09184
Nagel, K. A., Putz, A., Glimer, F., Heinz, K., Fischbach, A., Pfeifer, J., et al. (2012). GROWSCREEN-Rhizo is a novel phenotyping robot enabling simultaneous measurements of root and shoot growth for plants grown in soil-filled rhizotrons. Funct. Plant Biol. 39, 891–904. doi: 10.1071/fp12023
Nagel, K. A., Schurr, U., and Walter, A. (2006). Dynamics of root growth stimulation in Nicotiana tabacum in increasing light intensity. Plant Cell Environ. 29, 1936–1945. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01569.x
Nair, R., Strube, M., Hertel, M., Kolle, O., Rolo, V., and Migliavacca, M. (2023). High frequency root dynamics: sampling and interpretation using replicated robotic minirhizotrons. J. Exp. Bot. 74, 769–786. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac427
Nakajima, Y., Nara, Y., Kobayashi, A., Sugita, T., Miyazawa, Y., Fujii, N., et al. (2017). Auxin transport and response requirements for root hydrotropism differ between plant species. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 3441–3456. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx193
Nehnevajova, E., Ramireddy, E., Stolz, A., Gerdemann-Knorck, M., Novak, O., Strnad, M., et al. (2019). Root enhancement in cytokinin-deficient oilseed rape causes leaf mineral enrichment, increases the chlorophyll concentration under nutrient limitation and enhances the phytoremediation capacity. BMC Plant Biol. 19, 83. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1657-6
Ober, E., Le Bloa, M., Rajabi, A., and Smith, C. (2005). Genotypic differences in rooting patterns and soil water extraction related to drought tolerance in sugar beet. Compar. Biochem. Physiol. A-Mol. Integr. Physiol. 14, S302.
Orosa-Puente, B., Leftley, N., von Wangenheim, D., Banda, J., Srivastava, A. K., Hill, K., et al. (2018). Root branching toward water involves posttranslational modification of transcription factor ARF7. Sci. 362, 1407–1410. doi: 10.1126/science.aau3956
Osakabe, Y., Arinaga, N., Umezawa, T., Katsura, S., Nagamachi, K., Tanaka, H., et al. (2013). Osmotic stress responses and plant growth controlled by potassium transporters in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25, 609–624. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.105700
Pace, J., Lee, N., Naik, H. S., Ganapathysubramanian, B., and Lubberstedt, T. (2014). Analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) seedling roots with the high- throughput image analysis tool ARIA (automatic root image analysis). PloS One 9, e108255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108255
Parent, B., Hachez, C., Redondo, E., Simonneau, T., Chaumont, F., and Tardieu, F. (2009). Drought and abscisic acid effects on aquaporin content translate into changes in hydraulic conductivity and leaf growth rate: a trans-scale approach. Plant Physiol. 149, 2000–2012. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.130682
Peters, B., Blume-Werry, G., Gillert, A., Schwieger, S., von Lukas, U. F., and Kreyling, J. (2023). As good as human experts in detecting plant roots in minirhizotron images but efficient and reproducible: the convolutional neural network “RootDetector. Sci. Rep. 13, 1399. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28400-x
Pflugfelder, D., Kochs, J., Koller, R., Jahnke, S., Mohl, C., Pariyar, S., et al. (2022). The root system architecture of wheat establishing in soil is associated with varying elongation rates of seminal roots: quantification using 4D magnetic resonance imaging. J. Exp. Bot. 73, 2050–2060. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab551
Pierret, A., Gonkhamdee, S., Jourdan, C., and Maeght, J.-L. (2013). IJ_Rhizo: an open-source software to measure scanned images of root samples. Plant Soil 373, 531–539. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1795-9
Pierret, A., Kirby, M., and Moran, C. (2003). Simultaneous X-ray imaging of plant root growth and water uptake in thin-slab systems. Plant Soil 255, 361–373. doi: 10.1023/A:1026130532683
Placido, D. F., Sandhu, J., Sato, S. J., Nersesian, N., Quach, T., Clemente, T. E., et al. (2020). The Lateral root density gene regulates root growth during water stress in wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 1955–1968. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13355
Pospíšilová, H., Jiskrová, E., Vojta, P., Mrízová, K., Kokáš, F., Čudejková, M. M., et al. (2016). Transgenic barley overexpressing a cytokinin dehydrogenase gene shows greater tolerance to drought stress. N. Biotechnol. 33, 692–705. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2015.12.005
Pospíšilová, J., Synkova, H., and Rulcova, J. (2000). Cytokinins and water stress. Biol. Plant 43, 321–328. doi: 10.1023/A:1026754404857
Pound, M. P., French, A. P., Atkinson, J. A., Wells, D. M., Bennett, M. J., and Pridmore, T. (2013). RootNav: navigating images of complex root architectures. Plant Physiol. 162, 1802–1814. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.221531
Price, A. H., Cairns, J. E., Horton, P., Jones, H. G., and Griffiths, H. (2002a). Linking drought- resistance mechanisms to drought avoidance in upland rice using a QTL approach: progress and new opportunities to integrate stomatal and mesophyll responses. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 989–1004. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.371.989
Price, A. H., Steele, K. A., Gorham, J., Bridges, J. M., Moore, B. J., Evans, J. L., et al. (2002b). Upland rice grown in soil-filled chambers and exposed to contrasting water deficit regimes: I. Root distribution, water use and plant water status. Field Crops Res. 76, 11–24. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00012-6
Prince, S. J., Murphy, M., Mutava, R. N., Durnell, L. A., Valliyodan, B., Shannon, G., et al. (2017). Root xylem plasticity to improve water use and yield in water-stressed soybean. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 2027–2036. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw472
Qin, H., Wang, J., Chen, X., Wang, F., Peng, P., Zhou, Y., et al. (2019). Rice OsDOF15 contributes to ethylene-inhibited primary root elongation under salt stress. New Phytol. 223, 798–813. doi: 10.1111/nph.15824
Rahman, G., Sohag, H., Chowdhury, R., Wahid, K. A., Dinh, A., Arcand, M., et al. (2020). SoilCam: A fully automated minirhizotron using multispectral imaging for root activity monitoring. Sensors 20, 787. doi: 10.3390/s20030787
Rahnama, A., Fakhri, S., and Meskarbashee, M. (2019). Root growth and architecture responses of bread wheat cultivars to salinity stress. Agron. J. 111, 2991–2998. doi: 10.2134/agronj2018.12.0795
Rahnama, A., Hosseinalipour, B., Farrokhian, F. A., Harrison, M. T., and Ghorbanpour, M. (2024). Root architecture traits and genotypic responses of wheat at seedling stage to water-deficit stress. Cereal Res. Commun. 52, 1499–1510. doi: 10.1007/s42976-023-00481-4
Rahnama, A., Munns, R., Poustini, K., and Watt, M. (2011). A screening method to identify genetic variation in root growth response to a salinity gradient. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 69–77. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq359
Rascher, U., Blossfeld, S., Fiorani, F., Jahnke, S., Jansen, M., Kuhn, A. J., et al. (2011). Non-invasive approaches for phenotyping of enhanced performance traits in bean. Funct. Plant Biol. 38, 968–983. doi: 10.1071/fp11164
Remmler, L., Clairmont, L., Rolland-Lagan, A.-G., and Guinel, F. C. (2014). Standardized mapping of nodulation patterns in legume roots. New Phytol. 202, 1083–1094. doi: 10.1111/nph.12712
Ribeiro, K. M., Barreto, B., Pasqual, M., White, P. J., Braga, R. A., and Dupuy, L. X. (2014). Continuous, high-resolution biospeckle imaging reveals a discrete zone of activity at the root apex that responds to contact with obstacles. Ann. Bot. 113, 555–563. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct271
Richards, R. A. and Passioura, J. B. (1989). A breeding program to reduce the diameter of the major xylem vessel in the seminal roots of wheat and its effect on grain yield in rain-fed environments. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 40, 943–950. doi: 10.1071/AR9890943
Riefler, M., Novak, O., Strnad, M., and Schmulling, T. (2006). Arabidopsis cytokinin receptor mutants reveal functions in shoot growth, leaf senescence, seed size, germination, root development, and cytokinin metabolism. Plant Cell 18, 40–54. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.037796
Rieger, M. and Litvin, P. (1999). Root system hydraulic conductivity in species with contrasting root anatomy. J. Exp. Bot. 50, 201–209. doi: 10.1093/jxb/50.331.201
Ristova, D., Rosas, U., Krouk, G., Ruffel, S., Birnbaum, K. D., and Coruzzi, G. M. (2013). RootScape: a landmark-based system for rapid screening of root architecture in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 161, 1086–1096. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.210872
Russino, A., Ascrizzi, A., Popova, L., Tonazzini, A., Mancuso, S., and Mazzolai, B. (2013). A novel tracking tool for the analysis of plant-root tip movements. Bioinspir. Biomim. 8, 25004. doi: 10.1088/1748-3182/8/2/025004
Saad, A. S. I., Li, X., Li, H.-P., Huang, T., Gao, C.-S., Guo, M.-W., et al. (2013). A rice stress- responsive NAC gene enhances tolerance of transgenic wheat to drought and salt stresses. Plant Sci. 203, 33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.12.016
Salehi, F., Rahnama, A., Meskarbashee, M., Khanlou, K. M., and Ghorbanpour, M. (2023). Physiological and metabolic changes of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars in response to terminal heat stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 42, 6585–6600. doi: 10.1007/s00344-023-10911-6
Saucedo, M., Ponce, G., Campos, M. E., Eapen, D., García, E., Luján, R., et al. (2012). An altered hydrotropic response (ahr1) mutant of Arabidopsis recovers root hydrotropism with cytokinin. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 3587–3602. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers025
Schmidt, T., Pasternak, T., Liu, K., Blein, T., Aubry-Hivet, D., Dovzhenko, A., et al. (2014). The iRoCS Toolbox - 3D analysis of the plant root apical meristem at cellular resolution. Plant J. 77, 806–814. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12429
Schneider, C., Rasband, W., and Eliceiri, K. (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089
Seethepalli, A., Dhakal, K., Griffiths, M., Guo, H., Freschet, G. T., and York, L. M. (2021). RhizoVision Explorer: open-source software for root image analysis and measurement standardization. AoB Plants 13, plab056. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plab056
Seethepalli, A., Guo, H., Liu, X., Griffiths, M., Almtarfi, H., Li, Z., et al. (2020). RhizoVision Crown: An integrated hardware and software platform for root crown phenotyping. Plant Phenomics 2020, 3074916. doi: 10.34133/2020/3074916
Segal, E., Kushnir, T., Mualem, Y., and Shani, U. (2008). Water uptake and hydraulics of the root hair rhizosphere. Vadose Zone J. 7, 1027–1034. doi: 10.2136/vzj2007.0122
Selamat, N. and Nadarajah, K. K. (2021). Meta-analysis of quantitative traits loci (QTL) identified in drought response in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plants 10, 716. doi: 10.3390/plants10040716
Shu, M., Shen, M., Zuo, J., Yin, P., Wang, M., Xie, Z., et al. (2021). The application of UAV-based hyperspectral imaging to estimate crop traits in maize inbred lines. Plant Phenomics 10, 9890745. doi: 10.34133/2021/9890745
Silim, S. N., Saxena, M. C., and Erskine, W. (1993). Adaptation of lentil to the mediterranean environment. I. Factors affecting yield under drought conditions. Exp. Agric. 29, 9–19. doi: 10.1017/S0014479700020366
Singh, S., Yadav, S. K., Arya, S. S., Jacob, S. R., Gautam, R. K., Singh, G. P., et al. (2024). Unravelling morpho-physiological mechanism and candidate genes associated with salinity tolerance in superior haplotypes of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 210, e12756. doi: 10.1111/jac.12756
Sinha, P., Maurya, A. K., Abdi, G., Majeed, M., Agarwal, R., Mukherjee, R., et al. (2023). Integrated genomic selection for accelerating breeding programs of climate-smart cereals. Genes 14, 1484. doi: 10.3390/genes14071484
Siopongco, J. L. C., Yamauchi, A., Salekdeh, G. H., Bennett, J., and Wade, L. J. (2005). Root growth and water extraction response of double-haploid rice lines to drought and rewatering during the vegetative stage. Plant Prod. Sci. 8, 497–508. doi: 10.1626/pps.8.497
Slovak, R., Goschl, C., Su, X., Shimotani, K., Shiina, T., and Busch, W. (2014). A scalable open-source pipeline for large-scale root phenotyping of. Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26, 2390–2403. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.124032
Smit, A. L., George, E., and Groenwold, J. (2000). “Root observations and measurements at (transparent) interfaces with soil,” in Root Methods:A Handbook. Eds. Smit., A. L., Bengough., A. G., Engels van Noordwijk., C. M., Pellerin., S., and van de Geijn, S. C. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 235–271. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-04188-8_8
Smith, S. and De Smet, I. (2012). Root system architecture: insights from Arabidopsis and cereal crops. Philos. Trans. R. Soc Lond. B Biol. Sci. 367, 1441–1452. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0234
Smith, A. G., Han, E., Petersen, J., Olsen, N. A. F., Giese, C., Athmann, M., et al. (2022). RootPainter: deep learning segmentation of biological images with corrective annotation. New Phytol. 236, 774–791. doi: 10.1111/nph.18387
Solari, L. I., Pernice, F., and DeJong, T. M. (2006). The relationship of hydraulic conductance to root system characteristics of peach (Prunus persica) rootstocks. Physiol. Plant 128, 324–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00747.x
Sonia, Kaur, V., Yadav, S. K., Arya, S. S., Aravind, J., Jacob, S. R., et al. (2023). Development and evaluation of barley mini-core collection for salinity tolerance and identification of novel haplotypic variants for HvRAF. Plant Soil. 497, 317–337. doi: 10.1007/s11104-023-06397-6
Sordo, Z., Andeer, P., Sethian, J., Northen, T., and Ushizima, D. (2024). RhizoNet segments plant roots to assess biomass and growth for enabling self-driving labs. Sci. Rep. 14, 12907. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63497-8
Spollen, W. G., LeNoble, M. E., Samuels, T. D., Bernstein, N., and Sharp, R. E. (2000). Abscisic acid accumulation maintains maize primary root elongation at low water potentials by restricting ethylene production. Plant Physiol. 122, 967–976. doi: 10.1104/pp.122.3.967
Steele, K. A., Price, A. H., Shashidhar, H. E., and Witcombe, J. R. (2006). Marker-assisted selection to introgress rice QTLs controlling root traits into an Indian upland rice variety. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112, 208–221. doi: 10.1007/s00122-005-0110-4
Steele, K. A., Virk, D. S., Kumar, R., Prasad, S. C., and Witcombe, J. R. (2007). Field evaluation of upland rice lines selected for QTLs controlling root traits. Field Crops Res. 101, 180–186. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.11.002
Takahashi, F., Kuromori, T., Sato, H., and Shinozaki, K. (2018). “Survival strategies in extreme cold and desiccation,” in Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Eds. Iwaya-Inoue, M., Sakurai, M., and Uemura, M. (Springer, Singapore), 189–214. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-1244-1
Takahashi, H., Miyazawa, Y., and Fujii, N. (2009). Hormonal interactions during root tropic growth: Hydrotropism versus gravitropism. Plant Mol. Biol. 69, 489–502. doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9438-x
Takahashi, H. and Scott, T. K. (1993). Intensity of hydrostimulation for the induction of root hydrotropism and its sensing by the root cap. Plant Cell Environ. 16, 99–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00850.x
Takahashi, N., Yamazaki, Y., Kobayashi, A., Higashitani, A., and Takahashi, H. (2003). Hydrotropism interacts with gravitropism by degrading amyloplasts in seedling roots of Arabidopsis and radish. Plant Physiol. 132, 805–810. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.018853
Tan, J., Ben-Gal, A., Shtein, I., Bustan, A., Dag, A., and Erel, R. (2020). Root structural plasticity enhances salt tolerance in mature olives. Environ. Exp. Bot. 179, 104224. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104224
Tanaka, N., Mariko, K., Tomioka, R., Kurata, R., Fukao, Y., Aoyama, T., et al. (2014). Characteristics of a root hair-less line of Arabidopsis thaliana under physiological stresses. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 1497–1512. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru014
Tanaka-Takada, N., Kobayashi, A., Takahashi, H., Kamiya, T., Kinoshita, T., and Maeshima, M. (2019). Plasma membrane-associated Ca2+-binding protein PCaP1 is involved in root hydrotropism of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 60, 1331–1341. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcz042
Thaler, P. and Pagès, L. (1995). Root apical diameter and root elongation rate of rubber seedlings (Hevea brasiliensis) show parallel responses to photoassimilate availability. Physiol. Plant 91, 365–371. doi: 10.1034/J.1399-3054.1996.970222.X
Thorup-Kristensen, K. (1993). Root development of nitrogen catch crops and of a succeeding crop of broccoli. Acta Agric. Scand. B-Soil Plant Sci. 43, 58–64. doi: 10.1080/09064719309410233
To, J. P. and Kieber, J. J. (2008). Cytokinin signaling: two-components and more. Trends Plant Sci. 13, 85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.11.005
Topp, C. N., Iyer-Pascuzzi, A. S., Anderson, J. T., Lee, C. R., Zurek, P. R., Symonova, O., et al. (2013). 3D phenotyping and quantitative trait locus mapping identify core regions of the rice genome controlling root architecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, E1695–E1704. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304354110
Trachsel, S., Kaeppler, S. M., Brown, K. M., and Lynch, J. P. (2010). Shovelomics: high throughput phenotyping of maize (Zea mays L.) root architecture in the field. Plant Soil 341, 75–87. doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0623-8
Trachsel, S., Messmer, R., Stamp, P., and Hund, A. (2009). Mapping of QTLs for lateral and axile root growth of tropical maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 119, 1413–1424. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1144-9
Tracy, S. R., Roberts, J. A., Black, C. R., McNeill, A., Davidson, R., and Mooney, S. J. (2010). The X-factor: visualizing undisturbed root architecture in soils using X-ray computed tomography. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 311–313. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp386
Tran, L.-S. P., Urao, T., Qin, F., Maruyama, K., Kakimoto, T., Shinozaki, K., et al. (2007). Functional analysis of AHK1/ ATHK1 and cytokinin receptor histidine kinases in response to abscisic acid, drought, and salt stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16, 2481–2498. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706547105
Tuberosa, R., Sanguineti, M. C., Landi, P., Giuliani, M. M., Salvi, S., and Conti, S. (2002). Identification of QTLs for root characteristics in maize grown in hydroponics and analysis of their overlap with QTLs for grain yield in the field at two water regimes. Plant Mol. Biol. 48, 697–712. doi: 10.1023/a:1014897607670
Uga, Y., Okuno, K., and Yano, M. (2011). Dro1, a major QTL involved in deep rooting of rice under upland field conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 2485–2494. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq429
Uga, Y., Sugimoto, K., Ogawa, S., Rane, J., Ishitani, M., Hara, N., et al. (2013). Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nat. Genet. 45, 1097–1102. doi: 10.1038/ng.2725
Vadez, V., Kholova, J., Yadav, R. S., and Hash, C. T. (2013). Small temporal differences in water uptake among varieties of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) are critical for grain yield under terminal drought. Plant Soil 371, 447–462. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1706-0
Vadez, V., Rao, J. S., Kholova, J., Krishnamurthy, L., Kashiwagi, J., Ratnakumar, P., et al. (2008). Roots research for legume tolerance to drought: Quo vadis? J. Food Legume 21, 77–85.
Valifard, M., Le Hir, R., Müller, J., Scheuring, D., Neuhaus, H. E., and Pommerrenig, B. (2021). Vacuolar fructose transporter SWEET17 is critical for root development and drought tolerance. Plant Physiol. 187, 2716–2730. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab436
Vandeleur, R. K., Mayo, G., Shelden, M. C., Gilliham, M., Kaiser, B. N., and Tyerman, S. D. (2009). The role of plasma membrane intrinsic protein aquaporins in water transport through roots: diurnal and drought stress responses reveal different strategies between isohydric and anisohydric cultivars of grape vine. Plant Physiol. 149, 445–460. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.128645
van der Weele, C. M., Jiang, H. S., Palaniappan, K. K., Ivanov, V. B., Palaniappan, K., and Baskin, T. I. (2003). A new algorithm for computational image analysis of deformable motion at high spatial and temporal resolution applied to root growth. Roughly uniform elongation in the meristem and also, after an abrupt acceleration, in the elongation zone. Plant Physiol. 132, 1138–1148. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.021345
van Dusschoten, D., Metzner, R., Kochs, J., Postma, J. A., Pflugfelder, D., Buhler, J., et al. (2015). Quantitative 3D analysis of plant roots growing in soil using magnetic resonance imaging. Plant Physiol. 170, 1176–1188. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01388
Van Norman, J. M., Xuan, W., Beeckman, T., and Benfey, P. N. (2013). To branch or not to branch: the role of pre-patterning in lateral root formation. Dev. 140, 4301–4310. doi: 10.1242/dev.090548
Vissenberg, K., Claeijs, N., Balcerowicz, D., and Schoenaers, S. (2020). Hormonal regulation of root hair growth and responses to the environment in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 71, 2412–2427. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa048
Waite, J. M., Collum, T. D., and Dardick, C. (2020). AtDRO1 is nuclear localized in root tips under native conditions and impacts auxin localization. Plant Mol. Biol. 103, 197–210. doi: 10.1007/s11103-020-00984-2
Walter, A., Spies, H., Terjung, S., Kusters, R., Kirchgessner, N., and Schurr, U. (2002). Spatio-temporal dynamics of expansion growth in roots: automatic quantification of diurnal course and temperature response by digital image sequence processing. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 689–698. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.369.689
Wang, X., Bi, S., Wang, L., Li, H., Gao, B.-A., Huang, S., et al. (2020). GLABRA2 regulates actin bundling protein VILLIN1 in root hair growth in response to osmotic stress. Plant Physiol. 184, 176–193. doi: 10.1104/pp.20.00480
Wang, Z., Li, J., Lai, C., Zeng, Z., Zhong, R., Chen, X., et al. (2017). Does drought in China show a significant decreasing trend from 1961 to 2009? Sci. Total Environ. 579, 314–324. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.098
Wang, Z., Yung, S. W., Gao, Y., Huang, C., Zhao, X., Chen, Y., et al. (2024). From phenotyping to genetic mapping: identifying water-stress adaptations in legume root traits. BMC Plant Biol. 24, 749. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05477-8
Wasaya, A., Zhang, X., Fang, Q., and Yan, Z. (2018). Root phenotyping for drought tolerance: A review. Agronomy 8, 241. doi: 10.3390/agronomy8110241
Wasson, A. P., Nagel, K. A., Tracy, S., and Watt, M. (2020). Beyond digging: Noninvasive root and rhizosphere phenotyping. Trends Plant Sci. 25, 119–120. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.10.011
Wasson, A. P., Richards, R. A., Chatrath, R., Misra, S. C., Prasad, S. V., Rebetzke, G. J., et al. (2012). Traits and selection strategies to improve root systems and water uptake in water-limited wheat crops. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 3485–3498. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers111
Watt, M., Moosavi, S., Cunningham, S. C., Kirkegaard, J. A., Rebetzke, G. J., and Richards, R. A. (2013). A rapid, controlled-environment seedling root screen for wheat correlates well with rooting depths at vegetative, but not reproductive, stages at two field sites. Ann. Bot. 112, 447–455. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct122
Watt, M., Silk, W. K., and Passioura, J. B. (2006). Rates of root and organism growth, soil conditions, and temporal and spatial development of the rhizosphere. Ann. Bot. 97, 839–855. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl028
Weihs, B. J., Heuschele, D. J., Tang, Z., York, L. M., Zhang, Z., and Xu, Z. (2024). The state of the art in root system architecture image analysis using artificial intelligence: A review. Plant Phenomics 6, 178. doi: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0178
Werner, T., Nehnevajova, E., Köllmer, I., Novák, O., Strnad, M., Krämer, U., et al. (2010). Root-specific reduction of cytokinin causes enhanced root growth, drought tolerance, and leaf mineral enrichment in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Plant Cell 22, 3905–3920. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.072694
Williams, S. M. and Weil, R. R. (2004). Crop cover root channels may alleviate soil compaction effects on soybean crop. Soil Sci. Soc Am. J. 68, 1403–1409. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.1403
Wu, J., Kim, S. G., Kang, K. Y., Kim, J. G., Park, S. R., Gupta, R., et al. (2016). Overexpression of a pathogenesis-related protein 10 enhances biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in rice. Plant Pathol. J. 32, 552–562. doi: 10.5423/ppj.oa.06.2016.0141
Xiong, L., Wang, R. G., Mao, G., and Koczan, J. M. (2006). Identification of drought tolerance determinants by genetic analysis of root response to drought stress and abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 142, 1065–1074. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.084632
Xu, Y., Burgess, P., Zhang, X., and Huang, B. (2016). Enhancing cytokinin synthesis by overexpressing ipt alleviated drought inhibition of root growth through activating ROS-scavenging systems in Agrostis stolonifera. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 1979–1992. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw019
Xu, Z., York, L. M., Seethepalli, A., Bucciarelli, B., Cheng, H., and Samac, D. A. (2022). Objective phenotyping of root system architecture using image augmentation and machine learning in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Phenomics 2022, 9879610. doi: 10.34133/2022/9879610
Yadav, S. K., Santosh Kumar, V. V., Verma, R. K., Yadav, P., Saroha, A., Wankhede, D. P., et al. (2020). Genome-wide identification and characterization of ABA receptor PYL gene family in rice. BMC Genomics 21, 676. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07083-y
Yadav, S. K., Saroha, A., Singh, D., Yadav, P., Wankhede, D. P., Singh, G. P., et al. (2025). Deciphering ABA/PYL gene family in flax: evolutionary analysis, and abiotic stress response. Plant Cell Rep. 44, 140. doi: 10.1007/s00299-025-03517-7
Yadav, S. K., Singh, M., Wankhede, D. P., Singh, D., and Kaur, V. (2024b). “Integration of genomics-assisted allele mining approaches for improvement of flax: current advancements and future perspective,” in Allele Mining for Genomic Designing of Oilseed Crops. Eds. Kole., C., Pandey., M. K., and Puppala, N. (Boca Raton: CRC Press), 197–216. doi: 10.1201/9781003385035
Yadav, P., Yadav, S. K., Singh, M., Singh, M. P., and Chinnusamy, V. (2024a). Genome-wide identification and characterization of Isopentenyl transferase (IPT) gene family associated with cytokinin synthesis in rice. Plant Physiol. Rep. 29, 207–225. doi: 10.1007/s40502-024-00793-5
Yamamoto, Y., Kamiya, N., Morinaka, Y., Matsuoka, M., and Sazuka, T. (2007). Auxin biosynthesis by the YUCCA genes in rice. Plant Physiol. 143, 1362–1371. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.091561
Yang, J., Zhang, G., An, J., Li, Q., Chen, Y., Zhao, X., et al. (2020). Expansin gene TaEXPA2 positively regulates drought tolerance in transgenic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Sci. 298, 110596. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110596
Yasrab, R., Atkinson, J. A., Wells, D. M., French, A. P., Pridmore, T. P., and Pound, M. P. (2019). RootNav 2.0: Deep learning for automatic navigation of complex plant root architectures. GigaScience 8, giz123. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz123
Ytting, N. K., Andersen, S. B., and Thorup-Kristensen, K. (2014). Using tube rhizotrons to measure variation in depth penetration rate among modern North-European winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Euphytica 199, 233–245. doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1163-8
Yu, L., Chen, X., Wang, Z., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Zhu, Q., et al. (2013). Arabidopsis enhanced drought tolerance1/HOMEODOMAIN GLABROUS11 confers drought tolerance in transgenic rice without yield penalty. Plant Physiol. 162, 1378–1391. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.217596
Yu, L. H., Wu, S. J., Peng, Y. S., Liu, R. N., Chen, X., Zhao, P., et al. (2016). Arabidopsis EDT1/HDG11 improves drought and salt tolerance in cotton and poplar and increases cotton yield in the field. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14, 72–84. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12358
Yuan, F., Yang, H., Xue, Y., Kong, D., Ye, R., Li, C., et al. (2014). OSCA1 mediates osmotic- stress- evoked Ca2+ increases vital for osmosensing in Arabidopsis. Nat. 514, 367–371. doi: 10.1038/nature13593
Zaman-Allah, M., Jenkinson, D. M., and Vadez, V. (2011). A conservative pattern of water use, rather than deep or profuse rooting, is critical for the terminal drought tolerance of chickpea. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 4239–4252. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err139
Zeng, G., Birchfield, S. T., and Wells, C. E. (2008). Automatic discrimination of fine roots in minirhizotron images. New Phytol. 177, 549–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02271.x
Zenone, T., Morelli, G., Teobaldelli, M., Fischanger, F., Matteucci, M., Sordini, M., et al. (2008). Preliminary use of ground-penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography to study tree roots in pine forests and poplar plantations. Funct. Plant Biol. 35, 1047–1058. doi: 10.1071/fp08062
Zhang, S. W., Li, C. H., Cao, J., Zhang, Y. C., Zhang, S. Q., Xia, Y. F., et al. (2009). Altered architecture and enhanced drought tolerance in rice via the down-regulation of indole-3-acetic acid by TLD1/OsGH3.13 activation. Plant Physiol. 151, 1889–1901. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.146803
Zhang, Z., Li, F., Li, D., Zhang, H., and Huang, R. (2010). Expression of ethylene response factor JERF1 in rice improves tolerance to drought. Planta 232, 765–774. doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1208-8
Zhang, Q., Li, J., Zhang, W., Yan, S., Wan, R., Zhao, J., et al. (2012). The putative auxin efflux carrier OsPIN3t is involved in the drought stress response and drought tolerance. Plant J. 72, 805–816. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05121.x
Zhang, X., Mi, Y., Mao, H., Liu, S., Chen, L., and Qin, F. (2020a). Genetic variation in ZmTIP1 contributes to root hair elongation and drought tolerance in maize. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 1271–1283. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13290
Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Luo, Y., Zhang, L., Yao, Y., Han, L., et al. (2020b). OsABA8ox2, an ABA catabolic gene, suppresses root elongation of rice seedlings and contributes to drought response. Crop J. 8, 480–491. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2019.08.006
Zhang, Q., Yuan, W., Wang, Q., Cao, Y., Xu, F., Dodd, I. C., et al. (2022). ABA regulation of root growth during soil drying and recovery can involve auxin response. Plant Cell Environ. 45, 871–883. doi: 10.1111/pce.14137
Zhao, J., Bodner, G., and Rewald, B. (2016). Phenotyping: using machine learning for improved pairwise genotype classification based on root traits. Front. Plant Sci. 7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01864
Zhao, J., Bodner, G., Rewald, B., Leitner, D., Nagel, K. A., and Nakhforoosh, A. (2017). Root architecture simulation improves the inference from seedling root phenotyping towards mature root systems. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 965–982. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw494
Zheng, X., Chen, B., Lu, G., and Han, B. (2009). Overexpression of a NAC transcription factor enhances rice drought and salt tolerance. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 379, 985–989. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.163
Zhou, X., Yan, S., Sun, C., Li, S., Li, J., Xu, M., et al. (2015). A maize jasmonate Zim-domain protein, ZmJAZ14, associates with the JA, ABA, and GA signaling pathways in transgenic Arabidopsis. PloS One 10, e0121824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121824
Keywords: climate change, genetic regulation, lateral root density, non-invasive approaches, phytohormone crosstalk, QTLs, rhizotron, root depth
Citation: Kaur V, Yadav SK, Yadav B, Madaan S, Kheralia M and Chinnusamy V (2026) Root system architecture and drought adaptation: emerging tools and genetic insights. Front. Plant Sci. 17:1753086. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2026.1753086
Received: 24 November 2025; Accepted: 08 January 2026; Revised: 02 January 2026;
Published: 30 January 2026.
Edited by:
Ajay Kumar Mishra, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab EmiratesReviewed by:
Márcia Carvalho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, PortugalAfrasyab Rahnama, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran
Copyright © 2026 Kaur, Yadav, Yadav, Madaan, Kheralia and Chinnusamy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Vikender Kaur, a2F1cnZpa2VuZGVyQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==; dmlrZW5kZXIua2F1ckBpY2FyLm9yZy5pbg==; Shashank Kumar Yadav, c2hhc2hhbms4NmxpdmluekBnbWFpbC5jb20=