ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Sustainable and Intelligent Phytoprotection
This article is part of the Research TopicSmart Sensing in Plant Science: Advancing Plant-Environment Interactions for Sustainable PhytoprotectionView all 11 articles
Co-benefits of reduced carbon and water footprints and enhanced carbon sequestration with integrated organic-inorganic fertilisation and cover cropping in hilly citrus orchards
Provisionally accepted- 1College of Resources and Enviroment,Southwest University, Chongqing, China
- 2Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China
- 3Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, China
- 4Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing, China
- 5Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing, China
- 6Guangxi University School of Agriculture, Nanning, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Citrus, a globally significant fruit crop, is predominantly cultivated on sloping land in China with a large amount of resource input and incurs high environmental costs. Current research often relies on general parameters and rarely simultaneously assesses carbon footprint (CF) and water footprint (WF) to reveal the synergistic effects in emission reduction strategies. To address knowledge gaps, we conducted a two-year county-scale survey and a three-year field experiment in Zhongxian County, Chongqing, China. Five nutrient management schemes: chemical fertilizer (Che), chemical fertilizer plus organic fertilizer (Che + Org), chemical fertilizer plus cover crops (Che + CC), chemical fertilizer plus organic fertilizer plus cover crops (Che + Org + CC), and optimized management (OPT), and analyzed them using the life cycle assessment (LCA) framework. The results showed that OPT achieved dual benefits of high productivity and low carbon-water cost, with a CF reduction of 26.9% — 64.6% and a WF reduction of 75.7% — 92.1% compared to other treatments. Nitrogen fertilizer production and application were the primary CF sources, whereas cover crop integration markedly decreased WF. A significant positive correlation between CF and grey WF (p<0.05) indicates that cover crops simultaneously mitigated carbon emissions and reduced nitrogen/phosphorus runoff. While achieving these environmental benefits, the citrus yield of the OPT was 33.57% higher than that of the Che, and the economic returns were 45.51% higher. This study demonstrates that in the sloping land environment, selectively combining organic fertilizers and cover crops can transform the contradiction between yield and the environment into a synergistic effect, thereby deepening the understanding of sustainable nutrient management. The research results show that the OPT system as a superior nutrient management strategy for sloping citrus orchards. The research results also provide reliable and specific evidence to support the optimization of the "organic substitution" policy and offer a feasible approach for low-carbon, high-efficiency citrus production in ecologically fragile regions.
Keywords: Carbon Footprint, Hilly citrus orchart, Life Cycle Assessment, Optimal nutrient management, water footprint
Received: 09 Dec 2025; Accepted: 30 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Ning, Zhao, Lakshmanan, Wang, Ran, He, Zhan, Wang, Ye, Xiang, Wen, Shi, Zhao and Yuting. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jingkun Zhao
Zhang Yuting
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
