ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Nutrition
This article is part of the Research TopicExploring the Multi-Faceted Impacts of Biotic Stresses on Crop Quality and Control StrategiesView all articles
Pre-harvest bunch bagging as an eco-safe intervention for premium quality litchi production: Insights from a multi-location study in India
Provisionally accepted- 1National Research Centre on Litchi (ICAR), Muzaffarpur, India
- 2ICAR - Central Citrus Research Institute, Nagpur, India
- 3ICAR - Mahatma Gandhi Integrated Farming Research Institute, Motihari, India
- 4Farming System Research Centre for Hill and Plateau Region, Ranchi, India
- 5Nagaland University, Lumami, India
- 6Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, India
- 7Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, India
- 8Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar, India
- 9Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, India
- 10Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia, India
- 11Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
- 12ICAR - Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru, India
- 13ICAR - National Research Centre on Litchi, Muzaffarpur, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Pre-harvest fruit bagging is increasingly recognized as an eco-safe strategy to enhance fruit quality and mitigate biotic and abiotic stresses in high-value horticultural crops. However, its performance in litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) across contrasting agro-climatic environments remains inadequately documented. This multi-location study evaluated the effects of bagging material and timing on fruit damage, yield, and quality of litchi across nine major litchi-growing regions of India over four consecutive seasons (2020–2023). Seven treatments, including white and pink non-woven polypropylene bags applied at 15, 25, and 30 days after fruit set, along with an unbagged control, were tested using a factorial randomized block design. Bagging significantly reduced fruit cracking, sunburn, and borer infestation across locations, with strong location × treatment interactions (P ≤ 0.05). Compared with unbagged fruit, bagging lowered cracking and sunburn to ≤4–6% and ≤5–8%, respectively, while borer infestation remained below 3% in most environments. Yield increased by 10–35% depending on location, with the greatest gains observed when bagging was applied 25–30 days after fruit set. Bagged fruits also exhibited higher fruit weight, total soluble solids, and anthocyanin content, while maintaining desirable acidity levels. Hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis clearly separated bagging treatments from the unbagged control, associating bagging with higher yield and quality traits as well as reduced damage incidence. Overall, pre-harvest bagging emerged as a robust, location-resilient, and sustainable practice for improving litchi productivity and marketable quality.
Keywords: Borer infestation, Export quality, Fruit cracking, non-woven polypropylene bags, Sun burning
Received: 02 Jan 2026; Accepted: 10 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 KUMAR, Marboh, Purbey, Dhakar, Maiti, Sharma, Sharma, Singh, Chand, Sengupta, Chakraborti, Kaur, Singh, SINGH, Patil, Devi, Kumar, Dhakad, Samal, Vijayan and Das. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
SUNIL KUMAR
Prakash Patil
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
