ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Crop and Product Physiology
Physiological, Canopy, and Yield Responses of Quinoa to Irrigation and Nitrogen Management in the U.S. Midwest
Fatema T. Johora
Grato Ndunguru
Safiullah Pathan
Xukai Zhang
Nur Nesa
Addissu G Ayele
Lincoln University, Jefferson City, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) exhibits substantial physiological plasticity under water and nitrogen (N) stress; however, the mechanistic integration of stomatal regulation, canopy development, and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen (AEₙ) under humid temperate field conditions remains poorly understood. This study mechanistically evaluated the effects of irrigation regime and N rate on leaf gas exchange, canopy vigor, AEₙ, and grain yield during the 2024 and 2025 growing seasons in the U.S. Midwest. Two genotypes were tested under four irrigation regimes (full, progressive, deficit, and extreme deficit) and three N rates (0, 75, and 150 kg N ha⁻¹) using a split-plot design. The results indicated that the high-yielding genotype consistently produced higher grain yield across treatments, whereas the low-yielding genotype consistently produced lower grain yield; however, both genotypes responded similarly to irrigation and N application, with no significant genotype × management interactions. Irrigation primarily regulated gas exchange during early growth and flowering, whereas nitrogen status and irrigation × N interactions governed physiological performance during grain filling. Increasing N enhanced net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and NDVI at peak canopy development, but these increases did not translate into proportional yield gains at the highest N rate. Grain yield at 150 kg N ha⁻¹ under extreme deficit irrigation was comparable to that at 75 kg N ha⁻¹ under progressive irrigation, indicating strong water–nitrogen trade-offs. Agronomic efficiency of nitrogen differed significantly among irrigation regimes, whereas N rate and genotype had no significant effects, and AEₙ declined with increasing N input. Overall, moderate irrigation combined with 75 kg N ha⁻¹ was associated with improved physiological performance, canopy vigor, and favorable grain-yield and agronomic efficiency nitrogen responses, highlighting grain filling as the primary physiological control point under humid temperate conditions.
Summary
Keywords
gas exchange, grain filling, Irrigation management, NDVI, Nitrogen-use efficiency, Quinoa
Received
03 January 2026
Accepted
20 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Johora, Ndunguru, Pathan, Zhang, Nesa and Ayele. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Addissu G Ayele
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.