Skip to main content
Editorial09 November 2022
Editorial: Advanced use of materials in orthodontics

review on different clinical and technological aspects of clear aligners. We believe this article is a great starting lecture for everyone willing to know more about aligners clinical performance, but also a stimulus for young researchers looking for project ideas. The use of attachments represented also an alluring topic for different research groups, and this is not surprising since attachments are a crucial medium introduced to improve the transfer of forces and moments from the aligner to the teeth, thus substantially contributing to clear aligners' clinical effectiveness.Gazzani et al. evaluated the type of composite resin used for the application of attachments, concluding that conventional nanocomposites are the materials best suited for the clinical needs.Moreover, Ferlias et al. analyzed different shapes of attachments in an in-vitro setting to evaluate which geometry provided the highest derotational moment on an upper second premolar. This study could have a great clinical impact, since it highlights the importance in choosing the appropriate attachment geometry for various types of dental movement. Moreover., this study highlights that each attachment has some side-effects: for example, a vertical rectangular attachment seems to provide the greatest rotational moment, but at the cost of higher intrusion and inclination movement.Elshazly et al. presented a highly innovative in-vitro study by evaluating the forces produced by 3D-printed aligners made of shape memory polymers, so-called "four dimensional aligners". Indeed, the possibility to directly 3D printing the aligners -avoiding the steps of printing the models, thermoforming and then refining the aligners -the possibility to have materials with a high shape memory, and the possibility to have different thickness of the walls within the same aligner represent an incredible advantage over conventional produced aligners. Studies like the one presented in this Special Issue show the future direction in the clinical use of aligners, which will probably become the "new-normal" in the near future. Furthermore, biomaterials' innovation means the possibility to have materials that carry a biological effect. Crawford et al., presented the possible application of nanoparticles releasing nitric oxide for tooth movement modulation. Many researchers studied methods to influence tooth movement acting at a biochemical level, with alternating fortune. However, the use of locally injected nanoparticles with the ability to release active ingredients could be a promising technology. Crawford et al. obtained a significant result in Sprague-Dawley rats, inhibiting tooth movement for one week to achieve an "orthodontic anchorage effect"; nevertheless, further studies are needed to better understand the biological mechanism and to optimize nitric oxide treatment efficacy and longevity.Even old materials like elastomers, which are extensively used in daily practice, may reveal new features and clinically useful information: Castroflorio et al. evaluated the forces produced by different types of Class II intermaxillary elastics, concluding that 3/16" 4.5 oz elastics are the most reliable ones in terms of declared force and overtime degradation.Biomaterials and digital workfolw deeply changed the way Orthodonitcs is planned and practiced.The articles in this Special Issue demostrated that this is case and that their use will play a increasing role and will have a even larger inpact for the future of the profession.

4,698 views

1 citations

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
14 April 2022
Control of Orthodontic Tooth Movement by Nitric Oxide Releasing Nanoparticles in Sprague-Dawley Rats
Derrick Crawford, 2 more and Nan E. Hatch

3,968 views

8 citations

CORRECTION
15 February 2022
Corrigendum: Analysis of Class II Intermaxillary Elastics Applied Forces: An in-vitro Study
Tommaso Castroflorio, 5 more and Andrea Deregibus

1,283 views

1 citations

Clinical Performances and Biological Features of Clear Aligners Materials in Orthodontics
REVIEW
11 February 2022
Clinical Performances and Biological Features of Clear Aligners Materials in Orthodontics
Monica Macrì, 3 more and Felice Festa

25,941 views

64 citations

Potential Application of 4D Technology in Fabrication of Orthodontic Aligners
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
28 January 2022
Potential Application of 4D Technology in Fabrication of Orthodontic Aligners
Tarek M. Elshazly, 6 more and Christoph P. Bourauel

11,798 views

53 citations

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
4 February 2022
Comparison Between Different Composite Resins Used for Clear Aligner Attachments: An In-Vitro Study
Francesca Gazzani, 5 more and Roberta Lione

12,932 views

30 citations

Analysis of Class II Intermaxillary Elastics Applied Forces: An in-vitro Study
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
18 January 2022
Analysis of Class II Intermaxillary Elastics Applied Forces: An in-vitro Study
Tommaso Castroflorio, 5 more and Andrea Deregibus
Objectives The aims of this study were: 1) to assess the average inter-arch distances characterizing Class II malocclusions, 2) to analyze the applied forces at those distances by different elastics and 3) to compare measured forces with those declared by manufacturers, both in dry and wet environments. Materials and methods Settings and Sample population: Class II models of 167 adult subjects (96 F and 71 M, age: 28 ±3) referred to the orthodontic department of the University of Turin, between January 2018 and January 2020, were collected. Distances between facial axes (FA) points of upper canines and lower first molars (A), upper first premolar and lower first molar (B), upper second premolar and lower first molar (C), upper canine and lower first premolar (D), upper canine and lower second premolar (E), were measured, using 3Shape Ortho® Viewer program. Different elastics’ diameters and forces were tested at those distances. MTS Insight® Electromechanical Testing Systems was used to measure elastics’ tensile forces. The applied force were measured in dry (T0) and wet conditions, after 1h (T1), 6h (T2) and 12h (T3). Results Average distances were calculated: A=24.64mm (SD 2.10), B=16.3mm (SD 1.94), C=9.78mm (SD 1.77), D=9.8mm(SD 1.88) and E=15.99mm (SD 2.06). Significant differences (p<0.05) were highlighted between the measured force and the force declared by manufacturers, and all elastics had a significant force decay (p<0.05). Conclusions 3/16" 4.5 oz are the most reliable elastics in terms of applied force with respect to the declared one and in terms of force degradation.

19,327 views

6 citations