Abstract
Plant roots have important functions, such as acquiring nutrients and water from the surrounding soil and transporting them upwards to the shoots. Simultaneously, they must be able to exclude potentially harmful substances and prevent the entry of pathogens into the roots. The endodermis surrounds the vascular tissues and forms hydrophobic diffusion barriers including Casparian strips and suberin lamella. Suberin in cell walls can be induced by a range of environmental factors and contribute to against biotic and abiotic threats. Tremendous progress has been made in biosynthesis of suberin and its function, little is known about the effect of its plasticity and distribution on stress tolerance. In field conditions, biotic and abiotic stress can exist at the same time, and little is known about the change of suberization under that condition. This paper update the progress of research related to suberin biosynthesis and its function, and also discuss the change of suberization in plant roots and its role on biotic and abiotic stresses tolerance.
Introduction
Plant roots acquire nutrients and water from soil and transport them to the shoots, while toxic compounds must be restricted from entering the plant. To reach the central vasculature of the root, water and nutrients must cross the major tissue types of the root: the epidermis, the cortex and the endodermis. The epidermis is the outermost cell layer of young roots. The endodermis surrounds the vascular tissue. All vascular plants normally develop an endodermis in their roots, and the majority of angiosperm roots also have an exodermis which is a cell layer beneath the epidermis. The exodermis is absent in Arabidopsis, soybean, oats, barley and wheat (Perumalla et al., 1990; Thomas et al., 2007; Ranathunge et al., 2008; Kreszies et al., 2018).
The differentiation of the endodermis starts by the formation of the Casparian strip, as root development progresses, another type of barrier is formed, called suberin lamellae. This waxy, lipophilic layer is deposited all around the cellular surface of endodermal cells, impregnating the space between the cell wall and the plasma membrane (Nawrath et al., 2013; Vishwanath et al., 2015). The suberin layer appears to act as a transcellular barrier controlling the uptake or passive diffusion of ions from the apoplast into the symplastic environment of the endodermal cells (Barberon, 2017; Doblas et al., 2017). Plants have a variety of physiological response mechanisms when they are subjected to various stresses from the environment, and the deposition of suberin lamellae in the endodermis is one of them. This response can control the transport efficiency of various ions in plants, for reaching the ions balance in plants and reducing the toxic effect on plant growth and development. Suberin in cell walls can be induced by biotic and abiotic stresses (Hose et al., 2001; Enstone et al., 2003; Krishnamurthy et al., 2011; Tylova et al., 2017). It was also shown that suberin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis is affected by nutrient deficiencies such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), Zinc (Zn), potassium (K) and sulphur (S) (Barberon et al., 2016). It was suggested that plants can adapt to a sub-optimal nutrient supply in a highly dynamic and ion specific matter, either by an increasing or by a decreasing endodermal suberization (Barberon et al., 2016; Doblas et al., 2017). The suberized endodermis isolates the stele from the rest of the root, and function as a barrier to nematode entrance and against pathogen invasion into the xylem and spread throughout the plant (Holbein et al., 2019; Kashyap et al., 2021).
Establishment of suberin lamellae in the cell wall
The endodermal differentiation is marked by the deposition of suberin lamellae, which cover the cellular surface of endodermal cells (Nawrath et al., 2013; Vishwanath et al., 2015). From the root tip to the base, the suberized endodermal cells first form a patchy zone, then a continuous zone (Geldner, 2013; Barberon et al., 2016). The fully suberized zone has some non-suberized cells, called passage cells, which are always located close to xylem poles. The establishment of passage cells is governed by repression of cytokinin signalling in the root meristem, which ultimately results in non-suberized endodermal cells (Andersen et al., 2018).
Suberin is a chemically complex heteropolymer, which is a glycerol-based polymer consisting of a polyaliphatic polyester linked with phenolic components (Kolattukudy, 1981; Franke and Schreiber, 2007; Pollard et al., 2008). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) shows that the suberin lamellae contain electron-lucent and electron-dense contrasts, suggested to consist of polyaliphatics and polyaromatics, respectively (Graca and Santos, 2007). Suberin is chemically similar to cutin which is an insoluble lipid polyester deposited outside of the primary cell wall and which covers the outer face of the epidermal wall. However, suberin contains an aromatic domain which is not present in cutin (Schreiber, 2010).
The chemical composition of suberin in Arabidopsis roots was analysed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS), monounsaturated ω-hydroxyacids, α,ω-dicarboxylic acids and glycerol are the major monomers of suberin, followed by alcohols and unsubstituted fatty acids (Franke et al., 2005). Suberin consists of polyaliphatic domains and polyaromatic domains. It was suggested that the aliphatic domain primarily made suberin a transport barrier for water due to its high hydrophobicity (Zimmermann et al., 2000; Kreszies et al., 2018). In barley, the amount of aliphatic suberin in the primary root was increased in response to osmotic stress, and the osmotic stress-induced aliphatic suberin markedly reduced the water flow through the apoplast (Kreszies et al., 2019). In potato, the aromatic domain of suberin was reported to provide resistance to pathogen penetration (Lulai and Corsini, 1998), and it was suggested that the aromatic domains primarily make suberin as a transport barrier for nutrients (Kreszies et al., 2018). The composition of suberin between species is similar, however the content of suberin is strongly species dependent and can be induced by a range of environmental factors, which affect the efficiency of suberin as a barrier.
Biosynthesis of suberin
The biosynthetic machinery responsible for suberin productions is complex due to the chemical diversity of the suberin polymers. Chemical analysis and biochemical studies three decades ago were the initial steps to elucidate the biosynthesis pathways and structure of suberin (Kolattukudy, 1981). After that, approaches of reverse genetics on bark, potato periderm, cotton fibres, Arabidopsis root endodermis and seed coats made further progress on suberin biosynthesis (Molina et al., 2009; Ranathunge et al., 2011; Beisson et al., 2012; Li-Beisson et al., 2013; Graca, 2015). However, the sequence of biosynthetic reactions, transport mechanism of monomers and the site of polymerization of the precursors remain to be elucidated.
Biosynthesis of suberin monomers involves fatty acid and phenylpropanoid pathways. In plants, fatty acid synthesis occurs in the plastid stroma. However, the relationship between regulation of diffusion or transport of fatty acids through the lipid membrane of plastid with suberin biosynthesis is not clear (Figure 1). The core reactions of the suberin biosynthetic pathway were believed to take place at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Figure 1) (Li-Beisson et al., 2013). A large number of genes encoding enzymes involved in the synthesis of suberin have been identified (Vishwanath et al., 2015). However, many aspects of suberin biosynthesis remain undetermined. Whether suberin precursors are exported as monomers or building blocks is unclear (Beisson et al., 2012). The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, lipid transport proteins and secretion through vesicles are thought to be involved in the export of these monomers or building blocks out of plasma membrane to the site of polymerization (Figure 1) (De Bellis et al., 2022). The transporters that transport aliphatic monomers out of the plasma membrane have recently been identified, and all of them belong to the ABCG subfamily (Do et al., 2018). In Arabidopsis root, proteins of AtABCG2, AtABCG6 and AtABCG20 make contribution for the formation of suberin lamellae in endodermis (Yadav et al., 2014). Other ABC transporters, like OsABCG5 in rice root and StABCG1 in potato root and tuber periderm were also identified and described as suberin monomer transporters (Landgraf et al., 2014; Shiono et al., 2014).
Figure 1
Recently some regulatory genes of suberin synthesis have been described. In Arabidopsis, the transcription factorAtMYB41, AtMYB53, AtMYB92 and AtMYB93 are positive regulators of suberin biosynthesis in roots (Shukla et al., 2021). AtMYB107, AtMYB9 are required for suberin assembly in the Arabidopsis seed coat which were revealed highly conserved in angiosperms (Lashbrooke et al., 2016; Gou et al., 2017) and MdMYB93 was also described as a regulator of suberin deposition in apple fruit skins (Legay et al., 2016).
Deposition of suberin in cell wall
Suberin separates the cell wall from the plasma membrane and it can be found in root endodermis/hypodermis, seed coats, bark, and potato tuber skin (Schreiber, 2010). Suberin also deposits at the wound edges of potato periderm (Lulai et al., 2008) and at the site of lateral root emergence, where the CSs are disrupted (Li et al., 2017). The distribution of suberin in different plant tissues suggests that plants can synthesise and deposit suberin whenever and wherever they need to form a barrier (Kolattukudy, 2001; Franke and Schreiber, 2007). Recently, it is report that GELPs (GDSL-type Esterase/Lipase Protein family) play a key role in suberin polymerization and degradation both in the context of lateral root emergence and endodermal layer (Ursache et al., 2021). However, the mechanisms that regulate the onset of suberization are unclear.
The deposition of suberin in Arabidopsis roots starts in a patchy manner, then more and more endodermal cells are suberized until the whole endodermis is suberized except for some passage cells located close to xylem poles (Geldner, 2013). Suberization patterns in other plant species were also reported, there is variation between plant species due to the difference of root anatomy (Thomas et al., 2007; Waduwara et al., 2008; Ranathunge et al., 2017). In barley from root tip to root base, the deposition of suberin in endodermis was described as four different zones including non-suberized zone, patchy zone, continuous zone and fully suberized zone, and fully suberized zone was always the longest zone, accounting for about 50% of the root length, followed (in length) by the continuous, non-suberized and lastly the patchy zone (Chen, et al., 2019).
Abiotic and biotic stress tolerance
Besides the function as a barrier for water and nutrients, suberin lamellae in plant roots also contribute to abiotic and biotic stress tolerance. It has been found that suberization is induced during salt stress, cadmium (Cd) toxicity and ammonium stress, which suggest that the function of suberin is to block the entry of toxic elements into the cytoplasm (Krishnamurthy et al., 2009; Liska et al., 2016; Ranathunge et al., 2016). Suberization is also induced under drought and waterlogged conditions, suggesting a role for suberin in preventing water and oxygen loss (Kotula et al., 2009; Shiono et al., 2014; Liska et al., 2016). In rice, suberization is enhanced during salt stress and the extent of suberin deposition in the primary roots is negatively correlated with Na uptake into the shoots as is also the case for hydraulic (Krishnamurthy et al., 2009; Krishnamurthy et al., 2011). In Arabidopsis, horst and gpat5 mutants with reduced suberization show increased water transport and higher sensitivity to salt stress (Beisson et al., 2007; Ranathunge and Schreiber, 2011). In Arabidopsis, it was shown that suberization was reduced under Fe, Mn and Zn deficiencies, whereas S and K deficiencies lead to enhanced suberin (Barberon et al., 2016). The decrease in suberin was shown to be mediated by ethylene, whereas the increased suberization was controlled by abscisic acid (ABA). This endodermal suberin plasticity may reflect an adaptation of plant roots to cope with fluctuating nutrient availability by modulating the uptake of Fe, Mn and Zn and retain K and S in the stele (Barberon, 2017; Doblas et al., 2017). In the primary axis of barley roots, it was found that the suberization also responds to Mn deficiency, thus confirming the results from Arabidopsis. However, this response is not a linear process, as suberization was first reduced during mild Mn deficiency and then enhanced during strong Mn deficiency. Since the reduced suberin has secondary effects on the uptake of other nutrient elements, such as promoting K leakage from the stele, the enhanced suberization during strong Mn deficiency might favour retainment of K in the stele, thus maintaining nutrient homeostasis (Chen, et al., 2019).
Moreover, suberin might act as a barrier to prevent penetration by pathogens and nematode (Figure 2). The suberized endodermis serves as a line of defense preventing pathogens from invading the vascular tissues and spread throughout the plant (Ranathunge et al., 2008; Holbein et al., 2019; Kashyap et al., 2022). In soybean, it has been shown that there is a strong correlation between the exent of suberin and resistance to the fungus (Thomas et al., 2007). To colonize the root vasculature, the fungal hyphae have to penetrate the suberized layers and it was found that it took more time for hyphae growth in cultivars with high content of suberin (Ranathunge et al., 2008). Suberin also play important role in beneficial biotic interactions and the coordination between root suberin and the microbiome leads to a balancing of the plant ionome, which make plants adapt to abiotic stress condition (Salas-Gonzalez et al., 2020).
Figure 2
Perspectives
The growth of the human population will increase the demand for food in the future. However, the change of climate will intensify extreme weather conditions, for example drought, which might lead to decreased crop production. It is important to develop crops with increased yield and these crops should also be adapted to the specific soil conditions and climatic environment. The CSs and suberin lamellae in the endodermis of plant roots seem to play pivotal roles in controlling the uptake of water and nutrients and protect plants against biotic and abiotic threats (Barberon, 2017; Doblas et al., 2017; Kreszies et al., 2018). Understanding of the mechanisms underlying the functions of these root barriers is important, as this knowledge might help to develop crop varieties with improved nutrient use efficiency and better tolerance towards e.g. nutrient deficiencies, drought, salt stress and pathogens.
Suberin is not only deposited in the endodermis of plant roots but also in the bundle sheath of plant leaves, the vascular tissues in roots and leaves are thus surrounded by suberized cells. As a transcellular barrier, suberin has a similar function both in root and leaves, which affects the fluxes of solutes and pathogen penetration. Since the vascular tissues are continuous in the whole plant, it is necessary to analyse the function of suberin as a barrier in leaves and roots at the same time. Thereby, better understanding of the function of suberin as a barrier can be obtained. Finally, the biotic and abiotic (nutrient deficiency or toxic) stress can exist at the same time in the field condition. It is necessary to analysis the effect of suberization on pathogen penetration under abiotic condition.
Funding
This work was supported by the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-02), the natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (4312100205), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M673105) and Innovation and Entrepreneurship Program for College Students (Southwest University, X202210635025).
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
AC drafted and revised the manuscript. TL, ZW and XC revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AndersenT. G.NaseerS.UrsacheR.WybouwB.SmetW.De RybelB.et al. (2018). Diffusible repression of cytokinin signalling produces endodermal symmetry and passage cells. Nature555 (7697), 529–533. doi: 10.1038/nature25976;
2
BarberonM. (2017). The endodermis as a checkpoint for nutrients. New Phytol.213 (4), 1604–1610. doi: 10.1111/nph.14140
3
BarberonM.VermeerJ. E.De BellisD.WangP.NaseerS.AndersenT. G.et al. (2016). Adaptation of root function by nutrient-induced plasticity of endodermal differentiation. Cell164 (3), 447–459. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.021
4
BeissonF.Li-BeissonY.PollardM. (2012). Solving the puzzles of cutin and suberin polymer biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.15 (3), 329–337. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.03.003
5
BeissonF.LiY.BonaventureG.PollardM.OhlroggeJ. B. (2007). The acyltransferase GPAT5 is required for the synthesis of suberin in seed coat and root of arabidopsis. Plant Cell19 (1), 351–368. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048033
6
ChenA.HustedS.SaltD. E.SchjoerringJ. K.PerssonD. P.et al. (2019). The intensity of manganese deficiency strongly affects root endodermal suberization and ion homeostasis. Plant Physiol.181 (2), 729–742. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00507
7
De BellisD.KalmbachL.MarhavyP.DaraspeJ.GeldnerN.BarberonM. (2022). Extracellular vesiculo-tubular structures associated with suberin deposition in plant cell walls. Nat. Commun.13 (1), 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29110-0
8
DoblasV. G.GeldnerN.BarberonM. (2017). The endodermis, a tightly controlled barrier for nutrients. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.39, 136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.06.010
9
DoT. H. T.MartinoiaE.LeeY. (2018). Functions of ABC transporters in plant growth and development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.41, 32–38. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.08.003
10
EnstoneD. E.PetersonC. A.MaF. (2003). Root endodermis and exodermis: Structure, function, and responses to the environment. J. Plant Growth Regul.21 (4), 335–351. doi: 10.1007/s00344-003-0002-2
11
FrankeR.BriesenI.WojciechowskiT.FaustA.YephremovA.NawrathC.et al. (2005). Apoplastic polyesters in arabidopsis surface tissues-a typical suberin and a particular cutin. Phytochemistry66 (22), 2643–2658. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.09.027
12
FrankeR.SchreiberL. (2007). Suberin-a biopolyester forming apoplastic plant interfaces. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.10 (3), 252–259. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.004
13
GeldnerN. (2013). The endodermis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.64, 531–558. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120050
14
GouM.HouG.YangH.ZhangX.CaiY.KaiG.et al. (2017). The MYB107 transcription factor positively regulates suberin biosynthesis. Plant Physiol.173 (2), 1045–1058. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01614
15
GracaJ. (2015). Suberin: the biopolyester at the frontier of plants. Front. Chem.3, 62. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2015.00062
16
GracaJ.SantosS. (2007). Suberin: a biopolyester of plants' skin. Macromol Biosci.7 (2), 128–135. doi: 10.1002/mabi.200600218
17
HolbeinJ.FrankeR. B.MarhavyP.FujitaS.GoreckaM.SobczakM.et al. (2019). Root endodermal barrier system contributes to defence against plant-parasitic cyst and root-knot nematodes. Plant J.100 (2), 221–236. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14459
18
HoseE.ClarksonD. T.SteudleE.SchreiberL.HartungW. (2001). The exodermis: A variable apoplastic barrier. J. Exp. Bot.52, 2245–2264. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/52.365.2245
19
KashyapA.Jimenez-JimenezA. L.ZhangW.CapelladesM.SrinivasanS.LaromaineA.et al. (2022). Induced ligno-suberin vascular coating and tyramine-derived hydroxycinnamic acid amides restrict ralstonia solanacearum colonization in resistant tomato. New Phytol.234 (4), 1411–1429. doi: 10.1111/nph.17982
20
KashyapA.Planas-MarquesM.CapelladesM.VallsM.CollN. S. (2021). Blocking intruders: inducible physico-chemical barriers against plant vascular wilt pathogens. J. Exp. Bot.72 (2), 184–198. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa444
21
KolattukudyP. E. (1981). Structure, biosynthesis, and biodegradation of cutin and suberin. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.32, 539–567. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.32.060181.002543
22
KolattukudyP. E. (2001). Polyesters in higher plants. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol.71, 1–49. doi: 10.1007/3-540-40021-4_1
23
KotulaL.RanathungeK.SteudleE. (2009). Apoplastic barriers effectively block oxygen permeability across outer cell layers of rice roots under deoxygenated conditions: roles of apoplastic pores and of respiration. New Phytol.184 (4), 909–917. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03021.x
24
KresziesT.SchreiberL.RanathungeK. (2018). Suberized transport barriers in arabidopsis, barley and rice roots: From the model plant to crop species. J. Plant Physiol.227, 75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2018.02.002
25
KresziesT.ShellakkuttiN.OsthoffA.YuP.BaldaufJ. A.Zeisler-DiehlV. V.et al. (2019). Osmotic stress enhances suberization of apoplastic barriers in barley seminal roots: analysis of chemical, transcriptomic and physiological responses. New Phytol.221 (1), 180–194. doi: 10.1111/nph.15351
26
KrishnamurthyP.RanathungeK.FrankeR.PrakashH. S.SchreiberL.MathewM. K. (2009). The role of root apoplastic transport barriers in salt tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa l.). Planta230 (1), 119–134. doi: 10.1007/s00425-009-0930-6
27
KrishnamurthyP.RanathungeK.NayakS.SchreiberL.MathewM. K. (2011). Root apoplastic barriers block na+ transport to shoots in rice (Oryza sativa l.). J. Exp. Bot.62 (12), 4215–4228. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err135
28
LandgrafR.SmolkaU.AltmannS.Eschen-LippoldL.SenningM.SonnewaldS.et al. (2014). The ABC transporter ABCG1 is required for suberin formation in potato tuber periderm. Plant Cell26 (8), 3403–3415. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.124776
29
LashbrookeJ.CohenH.Levy-SamochaD.TzfadiaO.PanizelI.ZeislerV.et al. (2016). MYB107 and MYB9 homologs regulate suberin deposition in angiosperms. Plant Cell28 (9), 2097–2116. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00490
30
LegayS.GuerrieroG.AndreC.GuignardC.CoccoE.ChartonS.et al. (2016). MdMyb93 is a regulator of suberin deposition in russeted apple fruit skins. New Phytol.212 (4), 977–991. doi: 10.1111/nph.14170
31
Li-BeissonY.ShorroshB.BeissonF.AnderssonM. X.ArondelV.BatesP. D.et al. (2013). Acyl-lipid metabolism. Arabidopsis Book11, e0161. doi: 10.1199/tab.0161
32
LiB.KamiyaT.KalmbachL.YamagamiM.YamaguchiK.ShigenobuS.et al. (2017). Role of LOTR1 in nutrient transport through organization of spatial distribution of root endodermal barriers. Curr. Biol.27 (5), 758–765. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.030
33
LiskaD.MartinkaM.KohanovaJ.LuxA. (2016). Asymmetrical development of root endodermis and exodermis in reaction to abiotic stresses. Ann. Bot.118 (4), 667–674. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw047
34
LulaiE. C.CorsiniD. L. (1998). Differential deposition of suberin phenolic and aliphatic domains and their roles in resistance to infection during potato tuber (Solanum tuberosum l.) wound-healing. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.53 (4), 209–222. doi: 10.1006/pmpp.1998.0179
35
LulaiE. C.SuttleJ. C.PedersonS. M. (2008). Regulatory involvement of abscisic acid in potato tuber wound-healing. J. Exp. Bot.59 (6), 1175–1186. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern019
36
MolinaI.Li-BeissonY.BeissonF.OhlroggeJ. B.PollardM. (2009). Identification of an arabidopsis feruloyl-coenzyme a transferase required for suberin synthesis. Plant Physiol.151 (3), 1317–1328. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.144907
37
NawrathC.SchreiberL.FrankeR. B.GeldnerN.Reina-PintoJ. J.KunstL. (2013). Apoplastic diffusion barriers in arabidopsis. Arabidopsis Book11, e0167. doi: 10.1199/tab.0167
38
PerumallaC. J.PetersonC. A.EnstoneD. E. (1990). A survey of angiosperm species to detect hypodermal casparian bands .1. roots with a uniseriate hypodermis and epidermis. Botanical J. Linn. Soc.103 (2), 93–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1990.tb00176.x;
39
PollardM.BeissonF.LiY.OhlroggeJ. B. (2008). Building lipid barriers: biosynthesis of cutin and suberin. Trends Plant Sci.13 (5), 236–246. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.03.003
40
RanathungeK.KimY. X.WassmannF.KresziesT.ZeislerV.SchreiberL. (2017). The composite water and solute transport of barley (Hordeum vulgare) roots: effect of suberized barriers. Ann. Bot.119 (4), 629–643. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw252
41
RanathungeK.SchreiberL. (2011). Water and solute permeabilities of arabidopsis roots in relation to the amount and composition of aliphatic suberin. J. Exp. Bot.62 (6), 1961–1974. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq389
42
RanathungeK.SchreiberL.BiY. M.RothsteinS. J. (2016). Ammonium-induced architectural and anatomical changes with altered suberin and lignin levels significantly change water and solute permeabilities of rice (Oryza sativa l.) roots. Planta243 (1), 231–249. doi: 10.1007/s00425-015-2406-1
43
RanathungeK.SchreiberL.FrankR. (2011). Suberin research in the genomics era–new interest for an old polymer. Plant Sci.180 (3), 399–413. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.11.003
44
RanathungeK.ThomasR. H.FangX. X.PetersonC. A.GijzenM.BernardsM. A. (2008). Soybean root suberin and partial resistance to root rot caused by phytophthora sojae. Phytopathology98 (11), 1179–1189. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-98-11-1179
45
Salas-GonzalezI.ReytG.FlisP.CustodioV.GopaulchanD.BakhoumN.et al. (2020). Coordination between microbiota and root endodermis supports plant mineral nutrient homeostasis. Science. 371(6525). doi: 10.1126/science.abd0695
46
SchreiberL. (2010). Transport barriers made of cutin, suberin and associated waxes. Trends Plant Sci.15 (10), 546–553. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.06.004
47
ShionoK.AndoM.NishiuchiS.TakahashiH.WatanabeK.NakamuraM.et al. (2014). RCN1/OsABCG5, an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter, is required for hypodermal suberization of roots in rice (Oryza sativa). Plant J.80 (1), 40–51. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12614
48
ShuklaV.HanJ. P.CleardF.Lefebvre-LegendreL.GullyK.FlisP.et al. (2021). Suberin plasticity to developmental and exogenous cues is regulated by a set of MYB transcription factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.118 (39). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101730118
49
ThomasR.FangX.RanathungeK.AndersonT. R.PetersonC. A.BernardsM. A. (2007). Soybean root suberin: anatomical distribution, chemical composition, and relationship to partial resistance to phytophthora sojae. Plant Physiol.144 (1), 299–311. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.091090
50
TylovaE.PeckovaE.BlascheovaZ.SoukupA. (2017). Casparian bands and suberin lamellae in exodermis of lateral roots: an important trait of roots system response to abiotic stress factors. Ann. Bot.120 (1), 71–85. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx047
51
UrsacheR.De Jesus Vieira TeixeiraC.Dénervaud TendonV.GullyK.De BellisD.Schmid-SiegertE.et al. (2021). GDSL-domain proteins have key roles in suberin polymerization and degradation. Nature Plants7 (3), 353–364. doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00862-9
52
VishwanathS. J.DeludeC.DomergueF.RowlandO. (2015). Suberin: biosynthesis, regulation, and polymer assembly of a protective extracellular barrier. Plant Cell Rep.34 (4), 573–586. doi: 10.1007/s00299-014-1727-z
53
WaduwaraC. I.WalcottS. E.PetersonC. A. (2008). Suberin lamellae of the onion root endodermis: their pattern of development and continuity. Botany86 (6), 623–632. doi: 10.1139/B08-038
54
YadavV.MolinaI.RanathungeK.CastilloI. Q.RothsteinS. J.ReedJ. W. (2014). ABCG transporters are required for suberin and pollen wall extracellular barriers in arabidopsis. Plant Cell26 (9), 3569–3588. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.129049
55
ZimmermannM.HartmannK.SchreiberL.SteudleE. (2000). Chemical composition of apoplastic transport barriers in relation to radial hydraulic conductivity of corn roots (Zea mays l.). Planta210, 302–311. doi: 10.1007/PL00008138
Summary
Keywords
endodermis, suberization, plant lipophilic barriers, plasticity, stress tolerance
Citation
Chen A, Liu T, Wang Z and Chen X (2022) Plant root suberin: A layer of defence against biotic and abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 13:1056008. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1056008
Received
28 September 2022
Accepted
11 November 2022
Published
25 November 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Qiong Zhang, University of California, Berkeley, United States
Reviewed by
Changhai Liu, Northwest A&F University, China; Junli Wang, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Chen, Liu, Wang and Chen.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xinping Chen, chenxp2017@swu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Crop and Product Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.