REVIEW article

Front. Plant Sci., 06 June 2022

Sec. Plant Breeding

Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.883470

Exploiting Unreduced Gametes for Improving Ornamental Plants

  • 1. College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China

  • 2. Mid-Florida Research and Education Center, Environmental Horticulture Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Apopka, FL, United States

Article metrics

View details

11

Citations

5,6k

Views

2,2k

Downloads

Abstract

The formation of gametes with somatic chromosome number or unreduced gametes (2n gametes) is an important process involved in the origin of polyploid plants in nature. Unreduced gametes are the result of meiotic mutations occurring during micro- and mega-sporogenesis. 2n gametes have been identified or artificially induced in a large number of plant species. Breeding of plants through 2n gametes can be advantageous because it combines genetic effects of polyploidy with meiotic recombination and sexual hybridization to produce tremendous genetic variation and heterosis. 2n gametes also occur in ornamental plants, but the potential of using 2n gametes in ornamental plant breeding has not been extensively exploited. Ornamental plants are primarily produced for their esthetic appearance and novelty, not for food and yield, and they can be readily propagated through vegetative means. Triploids, tetraploids, and plants with even higher ploidy levels produced through 2n gametes can be propagated through tissue culture to fix their phenotypes, thus leading to the development of new cultivars. In this review article, we intend to discuss the mechanisms underlying the formation of 2n gametes, techniques for 2n gamete identification, methods for enhancing 2n gamete formation, and the current status in the use of 2n gametes for development of novel ornamental plants. We believe that polyploidy breeding through 2n gametes represents a viable way of developing new cultivars, new species, and even new genera of ornamental plants.

Introduction

Unreduced gametes are referred to as male or female gametes that have somatic chromosome numbers, thus they are also known as 2n gametes. This phenomenon as an important evolutionary force, however, was not recognized until the early last century. Prior to the 1920s, it was widely accepted that polyploidy in plants resulted from hybridization followed by chromosome doubling (Winge, 1917); Karpechenko (1927) was probably among the first to notice the occurrence of unreduced gametes. He believed that tetraploid Oenothera, Primula, Solanum, and Datura were not from the result of hybridization followed by chromosome doubling. In his study of hybridization between Raphanus and Brassica, Karpechenko (1927) found that hexaploid plants were not derived from doubling of triploid zygotes but caused by unreduced gametes from meiotic failure. The formation of unreduced gametes was further explained by Buxton and Darlington (1931) on amphiploid Digitalis, and they stated that the omission of reduction during the meiosis was the cause of somatic chromosome numbers. Subsequently, unreduced gametes were documented in an increasing number of plant species. Harlan and DeWet (1975) reported that unreduced gametes occurred in 85 plant genera. Recent studies showed that 2n gametes occur in a wide range of plants.

Unreduced gametes occur not only in plants but also in green algae, insects, chickens, mammals, birds, fish, and amphibians and have been considered a primary mechanism for polyploid formation (Mason and Pires, 2015). In plants, polyploids are not blind alleys or evolutionary dead-ends as claimed by Mayrose et al. (2011). Unreduced gametes facilitate polyploid formation and interploidy gene flow in mixed ploidy populations, resulting in increased genetic variation, fitness, heterozygosity, and breeding success. Additionally, 2n gamete formation is an essential component of apomixis Ravi et al., 2008 and an important way for the restoration of F1 hybrid fertility (De Storme and Geelen, 2013). Furthermore, 2n gamete formation generates novel genetic and genomic variation including synthesizing polyploid species, promoting plants to explore new environmental niches, and outcompeting their diploid progenitors.

This article is intended to review the occurrence of 2n gamete in ornamental plants, mechanisms underlying 2n gamete formation, the identification and use of 2n gametes for development of new ornamental cultivars. Ornamental plants are those grown for decoration and beautification of indoor and outdoor environments, not for food; thus, they are valued for their esthetic appearance, not for their yield. A large number of plants are produced as ornamental plants, including floriculture crops, ornamental shrubs, trees, grasses, and bamboos as well as ornamental aquatic plants (Chen, 2021). A significant number of ornamental plants are propagated vegetatively through natural means, such as bulbs, corms, runners, or artificial means like cutting, grafting, layering, or tissue culture. Evidence shows that 2n gametes have played a fundamental role in the development of polyploid cultivars, species, and even genera of ornamental plants, demonstrating the viability of sexual polyploidization in plant evolution and speciation.

Mechanisms of 2n Gamete Formation

Unreduced gametes generally arise from meiotic defects. Meiosis is a process of producing haploid cells during which diploid cells undergo DNA replication, followed by two rounds of cell divisions known as meiosis I and meiosis II (Figure 1). In meiosis I, homologous chromosomes pair with each other and undergo genetic recombination, a process allowing to exchange genetic information through crossover. The homologous chromosomes are then separated, resulting in two haploid cells having half the number of chromosomes as the parental cell, thus meiosis I is a reductional division. Meiosis II resembles mitosis where sister chromatids are separated from each other, producing four cells with reduced chromosome number, this process is known as an equational division. However, meiotic defects can occur, including the omission of the first or second meiotic division, abnormal spindle morphology in the second division, or disturbed cytokinesis (Bretagnolle and Thompson, 1995; Ramanna and Jacobsen, 2003). Meiosis restitution is the predominant mechanism of 2n gamete formation in plants (Brownfield and Kohler, 2011; De Storme and Geelen, 2013). There are three main mechanisms underlying the formation of 2n gametes in plants: first division restitution (FDR), second division restitution (SDR), and indeterminant meiotic restitution (IMR).

FIGURE 1

The First Division Restitution

In FDR, pairing and split-up of homologous chromosomes fail to occur or occur at a low frequency in meiosis I (Tang and Luo, 2002); but the second division proceeds normally, resulting in two sister chromatids of homologous chromosomes to move to opposite poles (Hermsen, 1984). There are two types of FDR: a strict sense and a broad sense (Sun et al., 2021). In the strict sense, there was no pairing and recombination, and chromosomes directly advance to the second division, resulting in 2n gametes that are genetically identical to the parent. Such an FDR fully maintains parental heterozygosity and epistasis. In the broad sense, meiosis I is not lost, chromosomes pair and undergo recombination, but the orientation and position of the spindles in meiosis II are disturbed (d’Erfurth et al., 2008), often being parallel (a), tripolar (b), or fused (c; Figure 1). As a result, the broad-sense FDR produces either two 2n gametes or one 2n gametes with two haploid gametes. In this case, 2n gametes partially retain the parental heterozygosity. However, the occurrence of crossover may increase genetic variation and also allow the introgression of genes of interest in breeding.

The Second Division Restitution

In contrast to FDR, the first meiotic division occurs normally in SDR. Homologous chromosomes pair with recombination, and they divide reductionally followed by cytokinesis to produce a dyad. In meiosis II, however, the centromeres of the half-bivalents divide, but the chromatids do not migrate to the poles (Figure 1). The resulting 2n gametes are homozygous from the centromere to the first crossover but maintain parental heterozygosity at the telomeric side (Ramanna and Jacobsen, 2003). As a result, 2n gametes derived from SDR have reduced heterozygosity and show a substantial loss of parental epistasis (Peloquin et al., 2008). In general, SDR is rare in hybrids because all chromosomes are not appropriately paired as bivalents, and it tends to occur only in hybrids with closely related genomes (Ramanna and Jacobsen, 2003). The presence of cytokinesis and the formation of a cell wall after the telophase I is characteristic for most of the monocot plants (Bielig et al., 2003; Boldrini et al., 2006).

Indeterminant Meiotic Restitution

The occurrence of IMR was first reported in interspecific hybrids of ornamental lily (Longiflorum × Asiatic lily; Lim et al., 2001). IMR shows characteristics similar to FDR and SDR in which both univalents and bivalents are formed at metaphase I. During the first meiotic division, some bivalents disjoin reductionally as in SDR, while some univalents divide equationally as in FDR (Figure 1), which give rise to 2n gametes with an odd number of parental chromosomes. Unreduced gametes produced in IMR only partially retain parental heterozygosity at the centromere (Zhou et al., 2008).

Origin of 2n Gametes in Relation to Ornamental Plant Breeding

The origin of 2n gametes has profound effects on breeding of ornamental plants. In general, 2n gametes derived from FDR are more advantageous than those from SDR for transferring parental heterozygosity (Barcaccia et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2009; Dewitte et al., 2012). In potato, FDR is known to be more than twice as effective as SDR in transmitting parental heterozygosity (Barone et al., 1995; Peloquin et al., 2008). Furthermore, progenies bred by FDR 2n gametes have more vigorous growth due to the higher allelic diversity (Yao et al., 2013). FDR is the basic mechanism of 2n pollen formation in Alstroemeria (Ramanna et al., 2003), Begonia (Dewitte et al., 2010a), Lilium (Lim et al., 2001; Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2008; Zhou et al., 2008; Khan et al., 2010), and Tulipa (Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2014). This is probably attributed to the chromosomal composition of FDR gametes that are more balanced and more viable than those from SDR and IMR. Additionally, 2n gametes derived from FDR or IMR with crossovers can increase genetic variation in polyploid progenies as well as the extent of introgressions Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2005. Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) analysis confirmed the presence of recombinant chromosomes in FDR derived 2n gametes in meiotic polyploids in Lilium (Khan et al., 2009a,b; Xie et al., 2010) and Tulipa (Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2012, 2014).

Methods for Identification of 2n Gametes

The identification of 2n gametes is largely focused on pollen as it is more convenient to isolate than egg cells. Common methods include pollen size measurements, flow cytometric detection of pollen DNA content, analysis of the microsporogenesis, and ploidy analysis of the progeny (Loginova and Silkova, 2017; Hwang et al., 2020). The identification of 2n eggs is complicated, which is performed by cytological examination using paraffin section, along with the ploidy analysis of the progeny.

Pollen Size

The traditional approach for identifying 2n pollen is based on pollen morphology. 2n pollen is commonly known as giant pollen (Bretagnolle and Thompson, 1995), which is defined as a pollen with a diameter greater than 1.5 times that of the normal one. This criterion is based on the assumption that the doubling of DNA content in 2n gametes would approximately double the pollen cell volume (Mason et al., 2011). In ornamental plants of Agave (Gomez-Rodriguez et al., 2012), Begonia (Dewitte et al., 2009), Dianthus (Zhou et al., 2015), Hibiscus (van Laere et al., 2009), and Rosa (Crespel et al., 2006), the diameter of the 2n pollen is about 30% larger than that of the haploid pollen. The presence of large 2n pollen grains results in a bimodal distribution of pollen sizes instead of a normal distribution (De Storme and Geelen, 2011). Although the size distribution between the pollen grains sometimes overlaps, a threshold value of the pollen grain size is often used to select individuals that produce 2n gametes (Sugiura et al., 2000; Crespel et al., 2006). However, caution should be given when using this method to guide 2n gamete identification because giant pollen does not necessarily prove doubled DNA content. Another disadvantage of this screening technique is the broad overlap in size distribution between small and large pollen in some genera, such as grasses. In these cases, the frequency of 2n pollen based on size is difficult to determine. Thus, other methods should be used to confirm the association between giant pollen and 2n pollen, and supplementary evaluation of pollen viability is necessary for breeding purposes.

Flow Cytometry

Flow cytometry has been widely used to measure pollen nuclear DNA content in order to understand pollen development and detect the presence of 2n pollen (Bino et al., 1990; Dewitte et al., 2009; van Laere et al., 2009; Zhu et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2021). Estimating male 2n gametes with flow cytometry entails extracting nuclei from a large number of pollen grains, staining them with a DNA-selective fluorochrome, and generating fluorescence histograms with peaks corresponding to groups of nuclei with different DNA content. Flow cytometric analysis compares the DNA content of pollen nuclei to the DNA content of somatic leaf tissue. Pollen nuclei are expected to have only half of the DNA content (1C) compared to nuclei from somatic cells (2C) of the same plant. Consequently, 2n pollen have a nuclear DNA content equal to that somatic cells.

Cytological Observation

The occurrence in 2n pollen is associated with the presence of monads, dyads, or triads during microsporogenesis (Negri et al., 1995; Fernandez et al., 2010; Chung et al., 2013; Nakato and Masuyama, 2021; Xu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021) except 2n gamete formation that is the result of pre- or post-meiotic restitution. Analysis of microsporogenesis may therefore provide an alternative method to identify 2n pollen, but this method does not provide any information about pollen viability. Cytological staining is carried out with dyes, such as acetocarmine, aceto-orcein, or fuscin, resulting in the visualization of chromatins. With the advent of a new cytological methods, immunostaining, in combination with the use of propidium iodide (PI) and 4’,6’-diamidino-2-phenylindol and spindle (anti-α-tubulin antibodies), cellular components involved in the division can be more accurately determined. Recently, immunostaining using antibodies to phospho-histone H3 (Ser10), which is characterized by localization along the entire chromosome length in the first meiotic division and only in the centromeric region in the second division, has made it possible to distinguish the stages of meiotic division (Loginova and Silkova, 2016).

Analysis of Progenies

Ploidy analysis of progenies (usually using flow cytometry) can reveal the presence of 2n gametes in parent plants. This method has been used frequently in ornamental plant breeding. In breeding of Hibiscus, five F2 hexaploid plants were isolated from self-pollinated hybrids of tetraploid F1, which was developed from the cross between H. syriacus “Oiseau Bleu” (4x) and H. paramutabilis (4x). The occurrence of hexaploidy indicated that the F1 hybrids must produce unreduced eggs since no unreduced pollen could be detected in the F1 hybrids (van Laere et al., 2009); Zhou et al. (2017) identified seven tetraploid hybrid plants from 12 progenies obtained from five crossing combinations between a tetraploid Dianthus caryophyllus “Butterfly” and diploid cultivars, suggesting that 2n male gametes were involved in polyploid formation. In lily breeding, four odd-allotetraploid seedlings were obtained from an interploidy cross, Lilium LA × AAAA. This result implied that the intergenomic variation was caused by 2n eggs, which was confirmed by GISH (Xiao et al., 2021). Progeny analysis, however, is time consuming with no guarantee of information about the production frequency of 2n gametes in the parental plants (Bretagnolle and Thompson, 1995) due to the differences in pollen viability, germination speed, or pollen tube growth between haploid and 2n pollen.

Genomic in situ Hybridization

The use of molecular cytological techniques, such as GISH and fluorescent in situ hybridization in combination with marker analysis, such as amplified fragment length polymorphism on meiocytes or polyploid progeny provides more accurate or additional information on the mechanisms behind 2n gamete formation (Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2005; Chung et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2021). Molecular cytological approaches have been successfully used in the case of allopolyploids, where the constituent genomes can be clearly discriminated (Xi et al., 2015). Through DNA in situ hybridization, genomes of allopolyploids can be more critically assigned and intergenomic translocations and recombination can be detected, which has been used in Gasteria-Aloe hybrids (Takahashi et al., 1997), Alstroemeria species (Ramanna et al., 2003), and Lilium species (Karlov et al., 1999; Lim et al., 2001; Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2005). As such, GISH can also be used to discover the mechanism of 2n gamete formation (Karlov et al., 1999).

Occurrence of 2n Gametes in Ornamental Plants

Unreduced gametes can occur naturally via the mechanisms described above and artificially through the manipulation of environmental conditions or use of specific chemicals. Thus, the natural occurrence is the formation of 2n gametes spontaneously without artificial intervention. Up to now, naturally occurring unreduced gametes have been reported in more than 40 genera across 60 species and hybrid progenies of ornamental plants (Table 1), and artificially induced 2n gamete formation has been reported in at least 10 genera of ornamental plants (Table 2).

TABLE 1

PlantType of unreduced gameteszIdentification methodFrequency of 2n gamete occurrence (%)References
Achillea eriophora (2x), A. tenuifolia (2x), A. oxyodonta (2x), A. talagonica (2x), A. biebersteinii (2x), A. wilhelmsii (4x), A. vermicularis (4x), A. millefolium (6x)MPollen size1.00–3.30 ySheidai et al., 2009
Adiantum pedatumCytological observationRabe and Haufler, 1992
Agave angustifolia var. “Cimarrón,”
A. angustifolia var. “Lineño,” A. tequilana
MPollen size and cytological observation1.20–3.20Gomez-Rodriguez et al., 2012
Alstroemeria F2 hybrids progeniesMCytological observation and GISH0.21–0.59Ramanna et al., 2003
ArandaMCytological observationOver 10%Lee and Tham, 1988
Begonia “Anna Christina,” B. dregei, B. pearcei, B. “Bubbles,” B. “Spatflacier,” B. “Orococo,” B. “Florence Rita,” B276MPollen size, cytological analysis, and flow cytometry2–100 yDewitte et al., 2009, 2010b
Camellia cultivar HJ (6x)MPollen size, cytological analysis, flow cytometry, ploidy level of progeniesZhang et al., 2021
Centaurea pseudophrygian (2x), C. jacea (4x)M/FProgeny analysisKoutecky et al., 2011
Cyclamen F1 hybridMCytological analysisIshizaka, 1998
Cymbidium sinense, C. lancifolium, and 30 F1 hybrids of C. sinense × C. lancifoliumMCytological analysis0.19, 0.22, 0–9.36Guo et al., 2021
C. sinense “Qijianbaimo,” “Damo,” “Hezhihua,” “Xiaoxiang,” “Taipingyang,” Cymbidium hybrids “Dafeng,” “Yunv,” “45–17,” “45–32”MCytological analysis and flow cytometry0.15–4.03Zeng et al., 2020
Cyphoniandra betace “B24,” “LA,” Variable typePollen size and cytological analysisPringle and Murray, 1992
Datura stramonium (4x)MCytological observation0.10 yBelling and Blakeslee, 1923
Dactylis glomerata subsp. castellala, D. lusitanica, D. aschersoniana, D. parthiana, D. himalayensis, galician type, D. juncinell, D. ibizensis, D. smithiiM/FProgeny analysis and cytological observation0.14–14.35/
0.10–25.68
Haan et al., 1992; Maceira et al., 1992
Dendranthema grandiflora (6x)MFlow cytometryBino et al., 1990
Dianthus caryophyllus “Promesa,” “Guernse Yellow,” “YunhongErhao,” “Red Barbara,” “L. P. Barbara,” “Nogalte,” “Arevalo”MPollen size and cytological analysis0–4.17Zhou et al., 2015
Diospyros spp. (6x) staminate germplasmMPollen size and ytological analysis0–2.30Xu et al., 2008
Fuchsia Hatschbachii, F. boliviana, F. microphylla, F. encliandra, F. trumpetor, F. fulgens × F. magellanica, F. fulgens × F. splendens, F. triphylla × F. splendensMPollen size and cytological analysis1–13Talluri, 2011
Geum hybridsMCytological analysis86 xGajewski, 1953
Helianthus F1 hybrids, 11 non-hybridsMPollen size, cytological analysis, progeny analysis, and GISH27.52 (hybrids), 0.56 (non-hybrid)Liu et al., 2017
Hibiscus F1 hybrids (4x)F, MPollen size, cytological analysis, flow cytometry, and progeny analysisvan Laere et al., 2009
Hydrangea aspera F1 hybrids (H1–10)MPollen size, cytological analysis, and progeny analysisCrespel and Morel, 2014
Ipomoea coccinea, I. quamoclit, I. F1 hybrids, F2 hybridsMCytological analysis and progeny analysis0.10–92.40Eckenwalder and Brown, 1986
Iris domestica, Iris dichotoma, F1-5, F2-2, F2-3, BC1-S-2, BC1-S-3, BC1-S-4,BC1-Y −1, BC1-Y −2MPollen size and cytological analysis0.20–2.30Xu et al., 2021
Lantana camara “Radiation” (4x), “UPL” (4x) “Gold” (4x), “Pink Caprice” (4x), “P604–1” (4x), “GDGHOP-36” (2x), “GDOP-4” (3x),
“PCOP-6” (4x), “PKGHOP-1” (2x)
FProgeny analysis5.50–100Czarnecki and Deng, 2009
Lilium F1 hybridsMPollen size, cytological analysis, and flow cytometryvan Tuyl et al., 1989
Lilium F1 AuH hybridsMCytological analysis, GISH, and progeny analysis42Chung et al., 2013
Lilium F1 hybrid “79418-2”MCytological analysis25.10Lim et al., 2004
Lilium F1 LA hybridsFGISH and chromosome nomenclatureXiao et al., 2021
Lilium LA hybrids “88542-24,” “88542-69,” “88542-52”MCytological analysis, GISH, and FISH3–30Lim et al., 2001
Lotus F1 hybrid “1321/46”MCytological analysis1.55Negri et al., 1995
Lotus tenuisMCytological analysis and progeny analysisNegri and Veronesi, 1989
Madia citriodora × gracilis (3x)
Layia pentachaeta × platyglossa (2x)
Madia nutans × rammii (2x)
M37x
14 x
11.60 x
Clausen et al., 1945
Microseris hybridsM21 x, 20 xChambers, 1955
Medicago coerulea, Medicago sativa, Medicago falcataF,MCytological analysis, and progeny analysisVeronesi et al., 1986
Mertensia echioides P-1, P-2, P-3MPollen size4–8.50Malik et al., 2014
Pancratium maritimumMCytological observationKonyar, 2017
Papaver hybridsM9.01 xYasui, 1931
Phalaenopsis Timothy Christonpher (2x), Dtps. Mini Red Rose (2x), P. Little Mary (3x) Dtps. Taisuco Pixie (3x), P. Taisuco Yellow Ball (4x), Dtps. King Shang’s Beaut (4x)MPollen size, cytological analysis, and flow cytometry0.55–2.84Zhu et al., 2014
Phegopteris decursivepinnata
“3x-1” (3x), “3x-2” (3x)
Cytological analysis and progeny analysis2.44, 3.18Nakato and Masuyama, 2021
Populus tomentosa “B111,”
Populus tomentosa × Populus bolleana
MPollen size and cytological analysis14.3,51.2Kang and Zhu, 1997
Primula sieboldii (2x, 3x, 4x) 53 cultivarsMPollen size0–10.80 yYamaguchi, 1980
Primula hybrids (3x)FProgeny analysis and flow cytometryHayashi et al., 2009
Quamoclit hybridsM2.41–6.90 xKagawa and Nakajima, 1933
Rosa hybrida “H3”MPollen size and progeny analysisEl Mokadem et al., 2002a
Rosa hybrida “H190,” “H95,” “H126,” “H61”FProgeny analysis58,79,92,97El Mokadem et al., 2002b
Rose hybrids “HW”MPollen size and cytological analysis0–9.60Crespel et al., 2006
Trifolium prutense C0, C1, C2, C3MPollen size and progeny analysis0.04–47.38Parrott and Smith, 1986
Trifolium prutense C1FPollen size and progeny analysis3.40Parrott and Smith, 1986
Trifolium prutense “Arlington,” “Florex,” “Redman,” “C760”FPollen size and progeny analysis0.014–0.50Parrott et al., 1985
Turnera F1 hybrids (5x)MCytological analysis0.03 2n or 4nFernandez et al., 2010; Kovalsky and Neffa, 2012

Natural occurrence of 2n gametes in ornamental plants.

zM and F represent male and female gametes, respectively.

yIndicates large pollen grains.

xEstimated by the relative frequency of dyads and tetrads during microsporogenesis.

TABLE 2

Induction methodMaterialType of unreduced gameteszIdentification methodFrequency of 2n gamete occurrence (%)References
CaffeineLilium F1 HybridsMFlow cytometry, GISH, and progeny analysisNA yLim et al., 2005
ColchicineEucalyptus urophyllaMPollen size and cytological analysis1.33–28.71Yang et al., 2016
Lilium FA hybrids “Jiaoyang”MPollen size and cytological analysis33–83Piao et al., 2020
Lilium “Con. Amore,” “Acapulco”FProgeny analysis1.20–9.50, 2.30–25.80Wu et al., 2007
Lilium oriental “Sorbonne”MCytological analysis and flow cytometry68Liao et al., 2016b
Lilium “Valdisole”MFlower bud sizes1.50–3.20Zang et al., 2010
Populus canescensMProgeny analysis, flow cytometry, and cytological obervation2.75–30.27Zhou et al., 2020
Populus tomentosa “B111” or
Populus tomentosa × Populus bolleana
MPollen size and cytological analysis38.70,
68.50–85.10
Kang and Zhu, 1997
Populus alba × Populus glandulosaFProgeny analysis and cytological observationNALi et al., 2008
Rosa “Old Blush”MPollen size and cytological analysis0.99–15.83Zhang et al., 2019a
Strelitzia reginaeMPollen size and cytological analysis20.30Zheng et al., 2017
Zantedeschia hybrid
“Black magic,” “Flamingo”
F, MProgeny analysis and cytological observationNALi et al., 2011
Nitrous oxideBegonia. subvillosa, Begonia F1 hybridsMPollen size, progeny analysis, and flow cytometryNADewitte et al., 2010a
Lilium F1 hybridsF, MProgeny analysis and cytological observationNABarba-Gonzalez et al., 2006
Lilium hybrids
“Kitazawa-Wase,” “Raizan”
MPollen size and progeny analysisNASato et al., 2009
Asiatic hybrid lilies “Mona,” “Alaska”MPollen size, flow cytometry, and cytological observation33–100,75–100Akutsu et al., 2007
Lilium hybridsMPollen size, cytological analysis, and flow cytometryNANukui et al., 2011
Lilium OT hybrids “Nymph,” “Gluhwein,” “Velloween”MPollen size and cytological analysisNALuo et al., 2016
Phalaenopsis amabilisMProgeny analysis, flow cytometry, and cytological analysisNAWongprichachan et al., 2013
Tulipa “Ile de France,” “Transavia”MPollen size and flow cytometry17–85Okazaki et al., 2005
TrifluralinBegonia cucullate, B. fischeri,
B. subvillosa
MPollen size, flow cytometry, and progeny analysisNADewitte et al., 2010a
Lilium HybridsFProgeny analysis, GISH, FISH, and
glow cytometry
NABarba-Gonzalez et al., 2006
Lilium LA hybrid “Bonsior”MPollen size and
cytological analysis
59.70Feng et al., 2012
Rosa chinensis minimaMPollen size and cytological analysisNAZlesak et al., 2005
High temperatureRosa hybrids “HW20,” “HW154,” “HW336”MPollen size, cytological analysis, flow cytometry, and progeny analysis0.10–0.80, 0.60–3.70,
0.70–4.70
Crespel et al., 2015
Rosa hybrids “HW336”MCytological analysis1.10–24.50Pecrix et al., 2011
Diospyros kaki (6x)MPollen size and cytological analysis0.77–22.04Mai et al., 2019
Populus pseudo-simoniiMCytological analysis20.78–63.09Wang et al., 2017b
Populus adenopodaFProgeny analysis, cytological observation, and flow cytometryNALu et al., 2013

Induction of 2n gametes in ornamental plants.

zM and F represent male and female gametes, respectively.

yNA, Not available from the publication.

Naturally Occurring 2n Gametes

Naturally occurring 2n gametes are mainly derived from two major sources: interspecific or intergeneric hybrids and odd-polyploids (Bretagnolle and Thompson, 1995). Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids have a greater chance to produce 2n gametes at a higher frequency than their parents (Ramsey and Schemske, 1998; Ramanna et al., 2003). The frequency of 2n male gamete formation in traditional cultivars of Cymbidium ranged from 0.5 to 1.0% but 2.5 to 4.03% in interspecific hybrids (Zeng et al., 2020). Unreduced gametes were produced in interspecific or intergeneric hybrids of Alstroemeria (Ramanna et al., 2003), Cyclamen (Ishizaka, 1998), Cymbidium (Zeng et al., 2020), Hibiscus (van Laere et al., 2009), Impatiens (Stephens, 1998), Lilium (Lim et al., 2001, 2004; Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2005), and red clover (Trifolium; Meredith et al., 1995; Table 1). Cytologically, interspecific hybrids either show no chromosome pairing or have abnormal pairing and the presence of lagging chromosomes, chromosome bridges, or univalent in meiosis (Trojak-Goluch and Berbec, 2003; Dewitte et al., 2012; Crespel and Morel, 2014; Wang et al., 2015). Two important features have been reported in 2n gamete formation among interspecific hybrids. First, 2n eggs and 2n pollen could be simultaneously produced by the same hybrid. Second, neither the two parents of the F1 hybrids nor their (F2) sexual polyploid progenies could produce 2n gametes in any notable frequencies (Ramanna and Jacobsen, 2003).

The second source for frequently producing 2n gametes is odd polyploids. Old polyploids are characterized by their karyotypic, genomic, and reproductive instability. As a result, their meiosis may produce gametes with different levels of ploidy, including 2n gametes. For example, triploid lily is generally sterile but can be used as a female parent to produce fertile progenies. In this case, there is an occurrence of 2n gametes. Thus, odd polyploids have been considered a source for 2n gamete formation, and triploids have been used as a bridge between diploids and tetraploids to produce higher polyploids (Köhler et al., 2010).

Artificial Induction of 2n Gametes

Unreduced gametes can be induced by manipulation of environmental factors, temperature in particular and treatment with chemicals, such as nitrous oxide (N2O), trifluralin, colchicine, and oryzalin (Table 2). The treatments, depending on the magnitude, may cause meiosis abnormalities in microspore mother cell, including chromosome separation failure (chromosomal adhesion or backward chromosomes) and spindle abnormalities (parallel, fused, and tripolar spindles; Li et al., 2016; Liao et al., 2016b; Wang et al., 2017b). Of these, parallel and fused spindles, and premature cytokinesis result in the formation of dyads, and the tripolar spindles create the triads during the tetrad period (Wu et al., 2011). These abnormalities could lead to the occurrence of 2n pollen.

Temperature Treatment

Either high or low temperatures have been shown to triggers 2n gamete production (Mason et al., 2011; Pecrix et al., 2011; De Storme et al., 2012; Crespel et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2015; Li et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017b; Mai et al., 2019); Lokker et al. (2005) grew four complete sterile lily genotypes in a phytotron with an extreme temperature fluctuation regime: four alternating periods of 10 and 30°C each day for 6 weeks and found that three of the four genotypes became fertile as evidenced by the production of viable 2n gametes. Pecrix et al. (2011) observed that the frequency of 2n pollen in Rosa plants after exposure to a high temperature gradient was up to 24.5% compared to the control treatment at 24°C. The 2n pollen mainly resulted from temperature-induced spindle mis-orientations in meiosis II.

Low-temperature treatment can also induce 2n gamete formation. A short period of cold stress at 4–5°C induced the production of diploid and polyploid pollens in Arabidopsis (De Storme et al., 2012). In Datura and Achillea, the frequency of 2n pollen formation was higher at low temperatures (Ramsey and Schemske, 1998; Ramsey, 2007); Mason et al. (2011) demonstrated that cold stress significantly stimulated 2n pollen production in B. napus × B. carinata interspecific hybrids. Zhang et al. (2019b) showed that low temperatures increased the frequency of SDR-type 2n female gametes in the diploid rubber clone GT1.

Chemical Reagents Induction

Colchicine, oryzalin, trifluralin, N2O, and amiprophos-methyl have been commonly used for inducing polyploids and also 2n pollen formation (Younis et al., 2014). Colchicine has been used for inducing 2n pollen of Begonia, Dianthus, Tulipa, Lilium, and other ornamental plants (Okazaki et al., 2005; Akutsu et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2007; Sato et al., 2009; Dewitte et al., 2010a; Lai et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2016). N2O can inhibit microtubule polymerization, but not actin filament formation. It was reported that N2O effectively induced 2n gametes (both 2n pollen and 2n egg) in Tulipa (Okazaki et al., 2005), Lilium (Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2006; Akutsu et al., 2007), and Begonia (Dewitte et al., 2010a). N2O as a gas can readily penetrate tissue, thereby protecting the tissues from harmful aftereffects as soon as the gas is released (Ostergren, 1954; Kato and Geiger, 2002); Akutsu et al. (2007) showed that effects of N2O were optimal when treatments started during pollen mother cell progression to metaphase I. Using this technique, fertile 2n gametes were induced from sterile hybrids, but the efficiency of the treatment was genotype specific (Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2006; Dewitte et al., 2010b).

Potential for Engineering 2n Gametes

With the advance in molecular biology, genes specifically responsible for 2n gamete formation have been increasingly identified. An Arabidopsis gene DYAD/SWITCH1 (SWI1) was found to be responsible for the production of 2n female gametes, resulting in progenies with triploid plants. AtPS1 (Arabidopsis thaliana parallel spindle 1) is another gene involved in 2n gamete formation in Arabidopsis (d’Erfurth et al., 2008). AtPS1 mutants produce up to 65% of 2n pollens, pollination with the pollen resulted in a large number of triploid plants in the next generation. ASMC5/6 (structural maintenance of chromosome 5/6) complex has been identified to be a crucial factor for preserving genome stability (Yang et al., 2021). SMC5/6 mutants show an absence of chromosome segregation during the first and/or second meiotic division, producing 2n gametes. A comparison of the well-established meiotic mutants in alfalfa with the genes identified from Arabidopsis showed that nine proteins belonging to A. thaliana known for their involvement in 2n gamete production occurred in alfalfa, suggesting common lineage of genes implicated in 2n gamete formation (Palumbo et al., 2021). Molecular techniques, particular CRISPR/Cas9 could be used for engineering plants with increased production of either 2n pollen or 2n eggs and used for breeding of novel polyploid ornamental plants.

Use of 2n Gametes for Improving Ornamental Plants

A large number of polyploid ornamental cultivars have been developed through the use of 2n gametes (sexual polyploidization). Table 3 lists some of those across 21 genera, which can be summarized as follows: (1) triploids developed from the cross of diploid × diploid in Cymbidium, Hevea brasiliensis, Lilium, Phalaenopsis, Populus, Rosa, Vaccinium, and Zantedeschia; (2) tetraploids derived from the cross of diploid × diploid, diploid × tetraploid, or tetraploid × diploid in Alstroemeria, Calluna vulgaris, Chrysanthemum, Cymbidium, Dianthus, Lilium, Morus alba, Petunia hybrida, Phalaenopsis, Phegopteris, Rosa, Primula, Pyrus, Ranunculus cantoniensis, Trifolium pretense, and Zantedeschia; (3) pentaploids produced from the cross of diploid × triploid, triploid × diploid, tetraploid × diploid, tetraploid × triploid, or diploid × hexaploid in Fragaria, Lilium, Phalaenopsis, Rosa, Primula, and Phegopteris; (4) hexaploids obtained from the cross of diploid × tetraploid, tetraploid × diploid, tetraploid × tetraploid, triploid × triploid, or diploid × octaploid in Fragaria, Phalaenopsis, Primula, and Phegopteris; and (5) octaploids selected from the cross of tetraploid × tetraploid in Primula. Additionally, sexual triploids of Hevea (Zheng et al., 1983), Populus (Zhang et al., 1992; Li et al., 1994; Kang et al., 2000; Guo et al., 2017), and Zantedeschia (Wu et al., 2011), as well as tetraploids of Petunia (Cai et al., 2020) and Lilium (Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2004) were also successfully developed using artificially induced 2n gametes.

TABLE 3

Species or genusPolyploidy obtainedParentsChanges in CharacteristicsReferences
AlstroemeriaTetraploidA. inodora (2x) × A. pelegrina (4x)NA zRamanna et al., 2003
CymbidiumTriploidC. × “Dafeng” (2x) × C. sinense “Hezhihua” (2x)Rounder flowers, wider sepal, petals, and lipsZeng et al., 2020
TriploidC. × “Yunv” (2x) × C. sinense “Xiaoxiang” (2x)More robust growth with rounder flowers
Triploid and tetraploidC. × “Yunv” (2x) × C. sinense “Taipingyang” (2x)NA
TriploidC. × “45–32” (2x) × C. × “45–17” (2x)NA
TetraploidC. × “45–32” (2x) × C. × “45–32” (2x)NA
ChrysanthemumTetraploidC. remotipinnum (2x) × C. chanetii (4x)Intermediate leaf size inherited from female while round-shape blade and petiole from male parentsAbd El-Twab and Kondo, 2007
CyclamenTetraploidCyclamen persicum (2x) × C. persicum (4x) or reverse crossLarger guard cellsTakamura and Miyajima, 1996
CallunaTetraploidHybrid cultivar 7705 of C. vulgaris (4x) × C. vulgaris (2x)Semi-fertile triploids with reduced invasivenessPrzybyla et al., 2014
DianthusAmphidiploid and tetraploidD. isebsis (2x) × D. japonicas (2x)Increased growth vigorNimura et al., 2006
FragariapentaploidF. vesca (2x) × F. elatior (6x)Vigorous plant growth with profusely flowersFedorova, 1934
HexaploidCultivar of F. vesca L.(2x) × cultivar of F. × ananassa Duch. (8x)NAYanagi et al., 2010
HeveaTriploid yGT1 (2x) × RRIC52 (2x)Fast growth and resistant to albinismZheng et al., 1983
TriploidGT1 (2x) × seventeen rubber trees (2x)NAYao et al., 2016
LiliumPentaploidBC1 (3x) × LLAA (4x)NALim et al., 2003
Tetraploid and hexaploid4X-OA (4x) × OA hybrids of Lilium (2x)NABarba-Gonzalez et al., 2004
Triploid and tetraploidOA hybrids of Lilium (2x) selfing progenyNA
Triploid and tetraploidAsiatic hybrids of Lilium or Oriental hybrids of Lilium (2x) × OA hybrids of Lilium (2x)NA
TriploidOA hybrids of Lilium (2x) × Asiatic hybrids of Lilium (2x)NA
TetraploidF1 OA hybrids “Vivaldi” (2x) × F1 OA “951301-5” (4x)NABarba-Gonzalez et al., 2006
TriploidF1 Longiflorum × Asiatic hybrids (2x) × Asiatic Lily cultivars (2x)NAZhou et al., 2008
TetraploidF1 Longiflorum × Asiatic hybrids (2x) × Asiatic Lily “Tresor” (4x)Taller stems with robust growth, tolerance to diseases and heat, and increased occurrence in bulbilXiao et al., 2021
LantanaHexaploidL.“Pink Caprice” (4x) selfing progeny or L.“Gold Caprice”(4x) selfing progenyNACzarnecki and Deng, 2009
PetuniaTetraploid y“Hongxia” (4x) × “Menghuan” (2x)Organs become biggerCai et al., 2020
PhalaenopsisTriploid and tetraploidP. Timothy Christonphe (2x) × P. Timothy Christonphe (2x)NAZhou et al., 2009
PentaploidP. Timothy Christonphe (2x) × P. aphrodite (3x) Or Phalaenopsis (3x) × Phalaenopsis (2x)NA
TetraploidP. Timothy Christonphe (2x) × P. Railin Red Angel (4x) Or P. Railin Red Angel (4x) × P. Timothy Christonphe (2x)NA
PentaploidP. Brother Yellew Boy (4x) × P. M30049 (3x)NA
HexaploidP. Ever Spring Light (4x) × P. HO’s French Fantasia (4x)NA
PopulusTriploid y(P. alba × P. glandulosa; 2x) × (P. tomentosa × P. bolleana; 2x) or reverse crossIncreased growth vigorKang et al., 2000
TriploidP. pseudo-simonii × P. nig “Zheyin3#” (2x) × P. beijingensis (2x)Increased growth vigorLiao et al., 2016a
Triploid yP. simonii or P. simonii × P. nigra var. Italica (2x); P. simonii × (P. pyramidalis + Salix matsudana; 2x)Increased cell size and growth vigorGuo et al., 2017
Triploid y(P. tomentosa × P. bolleana; 2x) × (P. tomentosa × P. bolleana; 2x)Vigorous growth with greener leavesZhang et al., 1992
PhegopterisHexaploidP. decursivepinnata (3x) selfing progenyRobust increase of leaf size with vigorous growth of plantsNakato and Masuyama, 2021
Tetraploid and pentaploidP. decursivepinnata (3x) ×
P. decursivepinnata (2x)
Tetraploid progeny had well-shaped leaves and increased growth vigor. Pentaploid progeny had small and irregularly indented leaves
PrimulaTriploidP. sieboldii (2x) × P. kisoana (2x)Flowers with a central eye that was pale-yellow or white, some had no eye at allKato and Mii, 2000
TriploidP. sieboldii (2x) × P. obconica (2x)Leaves were abnormally foldedKato et al., 2001
Triploid and tetraploidP. malacoides (2x) × P. malacoides (2x)Compact growth style with round petals and larger flowersHorn, 2004
TetraploidP. malacoides (2x) × P. malacoides (4x)Compact growth style with round petals and larger flowers
TetraploidP. malacoides (4x) × P. malacoides (2x)Compact growth style with round petals and larger flowers
TetraploidP. rosea (2x) × P. denticulata (4x)Increased stress toleranceHayashi et al., 2007
Hexaploid and octaploidP. modesta (4x) × P. denticulata (4x)
or reverse cross
Vigorous growth with very high pollen fertilityKato et al., 2008
Tetraploid, pentaploid, and hexaploidP. denticulate (4x) × P. modesta (2x)NA
Tetraploid and hexaploidP. modesta (2x) × P. denticulata (4x)NA
PentaploidDDR hybrid (3x) × P. denticulata (4x)Increased DNA contentHayashi et al., 2009
PyrusTetraploidP. “Dayali” (4x) × P. “Pingguoli” (2x)NACao et al., 2002
Ranunculus cantoniensisTetraploidR. silerifolius (2x) × R. chinensis (2x)NAOkada, 1984
RosaTriploidR. wichuraiana (2x) × H3 (dihaploid)NAEl Mokadem et al., 2002a,b
TetraploidR. hybrida cv Anna (4x) × H3 (dihaploid)NA
TetraploidR. hybrida var. F01473 (4x) × H3 (dihaploid)NA
TetraploidR. hybrida var. FJV6 (4x) × H3 (dihaploid)NA
Triploid and tetraploidSeveral dihaploid plants of Rosa (2x) × H3 (dihaploid)NA
TrifoliumTriploid and tetraploidT. cultivar “Arlington”-A (2x) × T. cultivar C51 (2x)NAParrott et al., 1985
TetraploidT. pretense (2x) × T. pretense (4x)NA
TulipaTriploidT. gesneriana (2x) × T. fosteriana (2x)Larger flower, sturdy
stem and plant size
Marasek et al., 2006
TriploidT. gesneriana (2x) × F1 Darwin hybrid (2x)NAMarasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2014
Tetraploid and pentaploidT. gesneriana “Bolroy Silver”(3x) × F1 Darwin hybrid (2x)NA
ZantedeschiaTriploid yPink persuasion (2x) × Black magic (2x) or Black persuasion (2x) × Pink magic (2x)Increased leaf size
with circular deformation
Wu et al., 2011

Polyploid cultivars of selected ornamental plants developed through the use of 2n gametes.

zNA, Not available from the publication.

yIndicates the artificially induced 2n gametes.

Polyploidization through 2n gametes represents a new trend in breeding of ornamental plants (Ramanna et al., 2012; Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2021). This is mainly due to the following factors: (1) Ornamental plants are prized by their novelty and esthetic appearance, including flower shape, size, and color; leaf shape, texture, color, and size; plant overall growth form and growth vigor (Henny and Chen, 2003). They are not cultivated for grain production; thus, there is little concern whether or not they are poor in seed production or sterile due to triploid block. Plants with unique phenotypes can be effectively propagated asexually using tissue culture technique to immediately increase the number of plants for commercial production. (2) An increasing number of ornamental plant species has been found to produce 2n gametes (Table 1). The frequency of 2n gamete occurrence typically ranges from 0.1 to 2.0%, but it could be much higher up to 10% in interspecific hybrids (Kreiner et al., 2017a,b; Sun et al., 2021). Many ornamental plants are actually interspecific hybrids (Kato and Mii, 2012). The higher frequencies offer a unique opportunity for breeders to manipulate chromosomes and develop new cultivars of ornamental plants (Table 3), which is described in the following subsections. (3) Polyploid plants, particularly those developed via 2n gametes generally have increased organ size, robust growth form, and improved tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses. Sexual polyploidization using 2n gametes allows the introgression of desirable traits in interspecific breeding and results in genetic heterozygosity and heterosis (Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2004, 2005, 2006). Although polyploidization can be attained through mitotic chromosome doubling (Eng and Ho, 2019; Niazian and Nalousi, 2020), this approach does not result in introgression breeding due to the lack of intergenomic recombination. (4) The ornamental plant industry is a fast-growing sector in world agriculture (Chen, 2021). Ornamental plants represent the sixth largest agricultural commodity group in the United States European countries, such as Netherlands produces a large quantity of diverse floriculture crops. The ornamental plant industry in China is blooming. The total turnover for floriculture crops (excluding ornamental trees and shrubs and ornamental grasses and bamboo) was estimated to be $300 billion (Azadi et al., 2016). A key driving force for the continuous growth of the ornamental plant industry is the demand for new cultivars with novel esthetic value (Henny and Chen, 2003; Noman et al., 2017). Thus, polyploidization through 2n gametes has been increasingly used for improving ornamental plants, and this is particularly true in bulbous and orchid crops. Most single and double flowered cultivars of Hippeastrum on the market are tetraploid. The majority of modern intersectional cultivars of Lilium are triploids, and some commercial ones are aneuploids. In the genus Narcissus, nearly 75% of cultivars are tetraploid, but only 12% each for diploid and triploid cultivars. Many tulip, chrysanthemums, and cultivated orchids are polyploid. Most modern commercially valuable rose cultivars are tetraploids. In fact, the availability of these neopolyploids is largely attributed to the functionality of 2n gametes used in breeding, which are briefly discussed as follows:

Cultivar Development Through Interploidy Crosses

Developing new cultivars through interploidy crosses is often difficult due to the difference in ploidy levels. However, the occurrence of 2n gametes can greatly facilitate interploidy crosses, resulting in the development of new polyploid cultivars. The interploidy crosses include 2x × 4x, 4x × 2x, or 2x × 3x. Hybridization of tetraploids with diploids or vice versa produced triploid semperflorens Begonia and Begonia rex (Horn, 2004; Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2016) as well as triploids Lilium (Lim et al., 2003; Zhou et al., 2008) and Tulipa (Kroon and Van Eijk, 1977; van Scheepen, 1996). Triploid Aloineae (Brandham, 1982), Dactylis (Jones and Borrill, 1962), Lilium (Lim et al., 2003), Primula (Hayashi et al., 2009), and Tulipa (Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2014) crossed with tetraploid counterparts resulted in pentaploid plants, respectively. Hydrangea macrophylla is one of the most economically important ornamental crops worldwide, with United States sales of Hydrangea species topping $120 million in 2014. A recent study showed that diploid (2n = 2x = 36), triploid (2n = 3x = 54), tetraploid (2n = 4x = 72), and even aneuploid H. macrophylla are most fertile and produce viable offspring in interploidy crosses. Triploid and tetraploid offspring can be produced by hybridization of diploid with diploid individuals or by crossing diploid with tetraploid plants, and even crossing triploids with either diploid or tetraploid plants. Such interploidy crosses are due to production of unreduced gametes (Trankner et al., 2020). Triploid hydrangeas have thicker stems, large flowers, and larger stoma compared to full-sibling diploids. These findings explained the origin of triploid hydrangeas and also why there are more triploid cultivars are on the market than diploid cultivars (Alexander, 2020).

Interspecific and Intergenic Cultivar Development

The availability of 2n gametes facilitates interspecific and intergenic hybrid development in ornamental plants. The aims of such hybridizations are to broaden genetic variability or transfer valuable traits, such as disease resistance and novel ornamental characteristics for developing new cultivars. Begonia is one of the largest genera of floriculture crops with more than 2,000 species. It has been divided into several groups based on the origin and growth characteristics. Among them, Elatior-hybrids represent about 88% of the total begonia production (Haegeman, 1979; Kroon, 1993). Most “Elatior” begonia were developed from crosses between different tuberous hybrid species (B × tuberhydrida) and B. socotrana (Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2016). Both spontaneous and induced 2n gametes have played important role in the interspecific hybrid development. For example, most “Elatior” hybrids are triploids, and a few are tetraploids (Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2016). The occurrence of 2n pollen was common in Begonia with a frequency varied from 1% in Begonia “Rubaiyat” to 100% in “Florence Rita” and B276 (Dewitte et al., 2009), of which FDR was the major mechanism underlying the 2n pollen formation (Dewitte et al., 2010a,b).

Tulip (Tulipa L.) is one the most popular bulbous crops, and its breeding has been aimed at the introgression of new flower colors and shapes, flower longevity, resistance to tulip breaking virus (TBV), Botrytis tulipae, and Fusarium oxysporum into commercial cultivars (Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2016). Interspecific crosses were made between T. gesneriana and T. fosteriana (TBV resistant) resulting in a series of cultivars including Darwin hybrids that are highly resistant to BVT virus (van Eijk et al., 1991; van Raamsdonk et al., 1995). More than 50 Darwin hybrid cultivars were developed (van Scheepen, 1996), which were largely derived from sexual polyploidization. This is because some Darwin triploids were fertile and could be backcrossed to T. gesneriana, and some F1 Darwin hybrids could produce 2n and haploid gametes, allowing the generation of polyploids (Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2016).

The occurrence of 2n gametes has also led to the formation of new species and new genera. Classical examples are tetraploid species of Tragopogon mirus and T. miscellus in the sunflower family (Soltis and Soltis, 2009). T. mirus (2n = 4x = 24) was derived from the cross of diploid T. dubius with diploid T. porrifolius (2n = 2x = 12), while T. miscellus (2n = 4x = 24) was developed from the cross of T. dubius with diploid T. pratensis. The underlying mechanism for the formation of the two species was explained by unreduced gametes produced by the diploid parents. An early example of synthesized genus is × Aranda orchids (Lee and Tham, 1988). This genus represents a group of intergenic hybrids developed from crosses between Vanda (2n = 2x = 38) and Arachnis (2n = 2x = 38). The initial hybrids (F1) of the two genera had 2n = 2x = 38 but were sterile. However, some of the hybrids produced 2n gametes at a rate up to 10%, and they were fertile as maternal parents. Backcross with either Vanda or Arachnis resulted in × Aranda hybrids with chromosome of 2n = 3x = 57. The vanda parents provide flower color and shape with the stacked strap leaves, and arachnis parents contributes curved, thin petals and fast growth characteristic. They have been widely used as cut flowers due to their vigorous growth and very abundant flowers. More than 200 such hybrids were developed prior to 1985.

Allopolyploid Cultivar Development

There are two types of polyploidy: autopolyploids and allopolyploids. The former display polysomic inheritance, and the latter in most cases show disomic inheritance. In general, allopolyploid plants show higher heterozygosity and heterosis. Lily as one of the most important floriculture crops with four popular genomes: Asiatic (A genome), Longiflorum (L genome), Oriental (O genome), and Trumpet (T genome; van Tuyl and Arens, 2011). Using 2n gametes, along with cut style pollination and embryo rescue, LA, OA, LO, and OT hybrids were developed (Asano and Myodo, 1977; van Tuyl et al., 2000). By somatic chromosome doubling, allotetraploid hybrids of LALA, OAOA, LOLO, OTOT, and LTLT were produced (Xiao et al., 2021). As 2n gametes occurs in those F1 hybrids, interploidy crosses of 2x × 4x produced LAA, OTO, LOO, and AOA cultivars. Additionally, three odd-allotetraploid cultivars, namely Honesty (LAAA; Zhou et al., 2013; Xiao et al., 2019), Original Love (LAAA; Yang et al., 2019; Zheng, 2019), and Santa Rosa (LLLO; Zhang et al., 2012) were developed. Since LA can produce a small number of 2n egg, “Honesty” was developed from a cross of LA × AAAA. LALA can produce a large number of 2n gametes, “Original Love” was selected from the cross of LALA × AAAA. “Santa Rosa” was derived from the cross of LOLO × LLLL or vice versa. Most functional 2n gametes were formed through FDR, and a few were derived from IMR. Compared to diploid, triploid, and other tetraploid plants, the odd-allotetraploid cultivars have taller and stronger stems, produce more bulbils, and resist diseases (Xiao et al., 2021). As 2n gametes are largely produced through FDR, the heterosis is probably attributed to intergenomic differences in the hybrids. Allopolyploidy can confer additional advantages: novel genetic variation, and phenotypes different to the parent species can be produced through transgressive segregation and allelic heterosis.

Triploid Cultivars Derived From 2n Gametes

Triploid plants can be recovered from the cross of 2x × 2x, 2x × 4x, 4x × 2x, or 2x × 3x, of which the cross of one parent that produces 2n gametes with another diploid parent is one of the most common practices (Wang et al., 2016). Studies showed that 2n gametes produced by a female parent plays important role in the successful formation of triploid plant (Ramsey and Schemske, 1998), and this is in part attributed to the appropriate endosperm balance number (Lu et al., 2013). Many triploid cultivars of Narcissus (Brandham, 1986), Lilium (Noda, 1986), Crocus (Ørgaard et al., 1995), and Tulipa (van Scheepen, 1996; Marasek et al., 2006) were developed from unreduced gametes of diploid parents. The early cultivars from the subgenus Narcissus were diploid, from which triploid cultivars arose in the latter half of 19th century due to the occurrence of 2n gametes. Subsequently, tetraploid Narcissus were developed by the end of the 19th century (Brandham, 1986). Tulips are important bulbous flowering plants with more than 8,000 cultivars in the market. Among them, Darwin hybrids represent an important group of cultivars grown for cut flowers, and they are triploids (2n = 3x = 36) developed from interspecific cross of Tulipa gesneriana (2n = 2x = 24) and T. fosteriana (2n = 2x = 24). GISH and median chromosome analyses showed that 24 chromosomes were derived from T. gesneriana and 12 chromosomes were from T. fosteriana (Marasek et al., 2006), suggesting that the one of the most popular groups of tulips, Darwin triploid hybrids were developed through 2n gametes derived from T. gesneriana.

A distinct characteristic of triploid plants is their sterility, known as triploid block, this is a phenomenon resulting in the formation of non-viable progeny after hybridization of plants with different ploidy. This is mainly due to the unbalanced meiotic chromosome segregation and endosperm imbalance (Köhler et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2017a). In ornamental plant breeding, triploid plants can be maintained through vegetative means, such as bulbous propagation in Crocus, Lilium, Narcissus, and Tulipa as well as micropropagation through tissue culture. Triploid ornamental plants generally have higher growth vigor, large flower size, sturdier stem, broader and thicker leaves, or more compact plants compared to their diploid progenitors because the energy that is normally devoted to seed production is used for the growth of flowers and other organs (Miyashita et al., 2009; Tiku et al., 2014). Furthermore, the sterility could be particularly useful for reducing the invasiveness of some ornamental plants. Some important ornamental plants are classified as invasive, as their seed production and dispersal by birds and other means could result in potential colonization of natural habitats that break the balance of native flora (Li et al., 2004). For example, Lantana camara is a popular ornamental plant but is considered an invasive species because its pollen can hybridize with an endangered relative L. depressa in Florida. Studies showed that triploid cultivars of L. camara had lowest pollen stainability at 9.3% compared to 64.6% in diploid and 45.1% in tetraploid cultivars (Czarnecki et al., 2014). Meanwhile, 2n female gametes were found to produce in diploid, triploid, and tetraploid cultivars (Czarnecki and Deng, 2009). Thus, the authors acknowledge that to develop triploid lantana, appropriate parental plants should be carefully selected (Czarnecki et al., 2012).

Triploid sterility, however, may not be completely correct. Increasing evidence shows that many triploids can be used as male or female parent in cross breeding programs (Lim et al., 2003; Zhou et al., 2008; Hayashi et al., 2009; Nakato and Masuyama, 2021). Pentaploids and hexaploids were produced by using of triploid as the parents in Phalaenopsis and Primula. In Phalaenopsis, no hybrids were produced from the cross of triploid × triploid; however, hexaploid was obtained from the self-pollinated progeny of triploid P. decursivepinnata. Numerous reports conform that triploid lily is usually sterile and can be used as a female parent to cross with suitable male parents (Lim et al., 2003; Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2006; Khan et al., 2009b; Xie et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2011, 2012, 2014; Chung et al., 2013; Xi et al., 2015; Dhiman et al., 2019); Cui et al. (2022) showed that all triploid lilies are partially fertile when used as female parents even they are completely sterile as male parents. The triploid lilies as female parents can be used to cross with appropriate diploid or tetraploid males to produce aneuploid cultivars.

Performance of Polyploid Hybrids Derived From 2n Gametes

Sexual polyploidization has significantly advanced ornamental plant breeding, resulting in a variety of novel cultivars in the market, including those from Alstroemeria, Begonia, Chrysanthemum, Cymbidium, Lilium, Phalaenopsis, Tulipa, and others. These cultivars have either unique or larger flowers, different colors, robust growth form, and resistance to different abiotic and biotic stresses. Furthermore, sexual polyploidization has resulted in not only new cultivars, but also new species and new genera, accelerating plant speciation. More than 40 years ago, Roose and Gottlieb (1976) demonstrated that T. mirus and T. miscellus, two relatively new allotetraploid ornamental plant species had combined allozyme profiles of the diploid parents (T. dubius and T. porrifolius for T. mirus; T. dubius and T. pratensis for T. miscellus). This report documented the link between genotype and biochemical phenotype as well as enzyme additivity. Now, we are in the age of genomics, polyploidization, particularly through the 2n gamete route, can cause genomic rearrangement (Soltis et al., 2004), changes in gene content and gene number, alternation in gene expression in combination with actions of transposal elements, small RNAs, and epigenetic regulation (Moghe and Shiu, 2014; Li et al., 2019; Williams, 2021). It is truly believed that such changes and interactions will result in different gene expression profiles, metabolism alternation, and morphology differences. With the art of selection, new cultivars and new plants will be developed. We are not concerned about the evolutionary dead-end of polyploidy, rather we are pursuing a better understanding how polyploidization has rearranged the genetic makeup of plants, how the changes alter gene expression, and subsequently phenotypic variation, and how we can better use 2n gametes as a means for developing novel plants and new cultivars.

Conclusion

The exploitation of 2n gametes creates a plethora of opportunities for practical breeding in ornamental plants. Spontaneous production of 2n gametes was found in more than 211 accessions belonging to 37genera, 25 families in ornamental plants. The occurrence frequency of 2n gametes ranges from 0.03 to 100.00%, depending on genetic and environmental factors. In general, the occurrence percentage of 2n gamete in interspecific or intergeneric hybrids was higher than traditional cultivars, but not all of the hybrids produce more 2n gametes. Both diploids and polyploids can produce 2n gametes, which can be used for producing polyploids with different ploidy levels. Triploids are generally thought to be an evolutionary dead-end, but in practice, they can be used as either the male or female parent in a cross-breeding program to produce sexual polyploids. 2n gametes can also be artificially induced by treatment with colchicine, N2O, and trifluralin and by manipulation of temperature. Artificial productions of 2n gametes are successfully achieved in 61 accessions belonging to 10 genera, nine families with the occurrence frequency ranging from 0.1 to 100%. Triploid, tetraploid, pentaploid, hexaploidy, and octaploid ornamental plants were created by the use of 2n gametes. Information gathered from this review shows that polyploid breeding with 2n gametes is an efficient and reliable method for ornamental plant breeding. With ongoing research at the molecular level and research toward efficient methods for inducing 2n gametes, the importance of 2n gametes for ornamental plant breeding will continue to increase in the future.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Author contributions

LX, JC, and Z-SZ conceived the idea, edited and refined the manuscript. L-ZK and X-QL conducted literature search and wrote the initial draft. All authors read, corrected, and approved the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported in part by the Science and Technology Plan of Guangzhou with the project number of 202002030068 and Special Project of Agriculture Science Independent Innovation of Guangzhou Agricultural Bureau, China (21102422).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Terri A. Mellich for critical review of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    Abd El-TwabM. H.KondoK. (2007). Rapid genome reshuffling induced by allopolyploidization in F1 hybrid in Chrysanthemum remotipinnum (formerly Ajania remotipinna) and Chrysanthemum chanetii (formerly Dendranthema chanetii).Chromosome Bot.219. 10.3199/iscb.2.1

  • 2

    AkutsuM.KitamuraS.TodaR.MiyajimaI.OkazakiK. (2007). Production of 2n pollen of Asiatic hybrid lilies by nitrous oxide treatment.Euphytica155143152. 10.1007/s10681-006-9317-y

  • 3

    AlexanderL. (2020). Ploidy level influences pollen tube growth and seed viability in interploidy crosses of Hydrangea macrophylla.Front. Plant Sci.11:100. 10.3389/fpls.2020.00100

  • 4

    AsanoY.MyodoH. (1977). Studies on crosses between distantly related species of lilies. II. The culture of immature hybrid embryos.J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci.46267273. 10.2503/jjshs.46.267

  • 5

    AzadiP.BagheriH.NalousiA. M.NazariF.ChandlerS. F. (2016). Current status and biotechnological advances in genetic engineering of ornamental plants.Biotechnol. Adv.3410731090. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.06.006

  • 6

    Barba-GonzalezR.LimK. B.RamannaM. S.VisserR. G. F.van TuylJ. M. (2005). Occurrence of 2n gametes in the F1 hybrids of oriental × Asiatic lilies (Lilium): relevance to intergenomic recombination and backcrossing.Euphytica1436773. 10.1007/s10681-005-2657-1

  • 7

    Barba-GonzalezR.LimK. B.ZhouS.RamannaM. S.Van TuylJ. M. (2008). “Interspecific hybridization in lily: the use of 2n gametes in interspecific lily hybrids,” in Floriculture, Ornamental and Plant Biotechnology, Vol. V, ed.Teixeira da SilvaJ. A. (London: Global Science Books), 138145.

  • 8

    Barba-GonzalezR.LokkerA. C.LimK. B.RamannaM. S.van TuylJ. M. (2004). Use of 2n gametes for the production of sexual polyploids from sterile Oriental × Asiatic hybrids of lilies (Lilium).Theor. Appl. Genet.10911251132. 10.1007/s00122-004-1739-0

  • 9

    Barba-GonzalezR.MillerC. T.RamannaM. S.van TuylJ. M. (2006). Nitrous oxide (N2O) induces 2n gametes in sterile F-1 hybrids between oriental x Asiatic lily (Lilium) hybrids and leads to intergenomic recombination.Euphytica148303309. 10.1007/s10681-005-9032-0

  • 10

    BarcacciaG.TavolettiS.MarianiA.FabioV. (2003). Occurrence, inheritance and use of reproductive mutants in alfalfa improvement.Euphytica1333756. 10.1023/A:1025646523940

  • 11

    BaroneA.GebhardtC.FruscianteL. (1995). Heterozygosity in 2n gametes of potato evaluated by RFLP markers.Theor. Appl. Genet.9198104. 10.1007/BF00220864

  • 12

    BellingJ.BlakesleeA. F. (1923). The reduction division in haploid, diploid, triploid and tetraploid Daturas.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.9106111. 10.1073/pnas.9.4.106

  • 13

    BieligL. M.MarianiA.BerdingN. (2003). Cytological studies of 2n male gamete formation in sugarcane Saccharum L.Euphytica133117124.

  • 14

    BinoR. J.Van TuylT. J. M.De VroesJ. N. (1990). Flow cytometric determination of relative nuclear DNA contents in bicellulate and tricellulate pollen.Ann. Bot.6538. 10.2307/2444802

  • 15

    BoldriniK. R.PagliariniM. S.DoValleC. B. (2006). Abnormal timing of cytokinesis in microsporogenesis in Brachiaria humidicola (Poaceae: Paniceae).J. Genet.85225228. 10.1007/BF02935337

  • 16

    BrandhamP. E. (1982). Inter-embryo competition in the progeny of autotriploid Aloineae (Liliaceae).Genetica592942. 10.1007/bf00130812

  • 17

    BrandhamP. E. (1986). Evolution of polyploidy in cultivated Narcissus subgenus Narcissus.Genetica68161167. 10.1007/BF02424439

  • 18

    BretagnolleF.ThompsonJ. D. (1995). Gametes with the somatic chromosome number: mechanisms of their formation and role in the evolution of autopolyploid plants.New Phytol.129122. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb03005.x

  • 19

    BrownfieldL.KohlerC. (2011). Unreduced gamete formation in plants: mechanisms and prospects.J. Exp. Bot.6216591668. 10.1093/jxb/erq371

  • 20

    BuxtonB. H.DarlingtonC. D. (1931). Behaviour of a new species, Digitalis mertonensis.Nature127:94. 10.1038/127094b0

  • 21

    CaiS. Y.WeiY.SheH. L.ZhangY.WeiW.LuJ. Q. (2020). Study on creation of tetraploid Petunia hybrida by sexual polyploidization.Southern Hort.311216.

  • 22

    CaoY.HuangL.LiS.YangY. (2002). Genetics of ploidy and hybridized types for polyploidy breeding in pear.Acta Hort.587207211. 10.17660/actahortic.2002.587.24

  • 23

    ChambersK. L. (1955). A biosystematic study of the annual species of Microseris.Contrib. Dudley Herb.4207312.

  • 24

    ChenJ. (2021). Ornamental plant research inaugural editorial.Ornam. Plant Res.112. 10.48130/opr-2021-0001

  • 25

    ChungM. Y.ChungJ. D.RamannaM.van TuylJ. M.LimK. B. (2013). Production of polyploids and unreduced gametes in Lilium auratum x L. henryi hybrid.Int. J. Biol. Sci.9693701.

  • 26

    ClausenJ.KeckD. D.HieseyW. M. (1945). Experimental Studies on the Nature of Species II. Plant Evolution Through Amphiploidy and Autopolyploidy, with Examples from the Madiinae.Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute Washington.

  • 27

    CrespelL.Le BrasC.RelionD.RomanH.MorelP. (2015). Effect of high temperature on the production of 2n pollen grains in diploid roses and obtaining tetraploids via unilateral polyploidization.Plant Breed.134356364. 10.1111/pbr.12271

  • 28

    CrespelL.MorelP. (2014). Pollen viability and meiotic behaviour in intraspecific hybrids of Hydrangea aspera subsp aspera Kawakami group x subsp sargentiana.Plant Breed.133536541. 10.1111/pbr.12170

  • 29

    CrespelL.RicciS. C.GudinS. (2006). The production of 2n pollen in rose.Euphytica151155164. 10.1007/s10681-006-9136-1

  • 30

    CuiL.SunY.XiaoK.WanL.ZhongJ.LiuY.et al (2022). Analysis on the abnormal chromosomal behaviour and the partial female fertility of allotriploid Lilium – ‘Triumphator’ (LLO) is not exceptional to the hypothesis of lily interploid hybridizations.Sci. Hortic.293:110746. 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110746

  • 31

    CzarneckiD. M.DengZ. N. (2009). Unreduced gametes and polyploidization in Lantana camara.Hortscience44:1054.

  • 32

    CzarneckiD. M.HershbergerA. J.RobackerC. D.ClarkD. G.DengZ. A. (2014). Ploidy levels and pollen stainability of Lantana camara cultivars and breeding lines.Hortscience4912711276. 10.21273/hortsci.49.10.1271

  • 33

    CzarneckiD. M.WilsonS. B.KnoxG. W.FreyreR.DengZ. A. (2012). UF-T3 and UF-T4: two sterile Lantana camara cultivars.Hortscience47132137. 10.21273/hortsci.47.1.132

  • 34

    De StormeN.CopenhaverG. P.GeelenD. (2012). Production of diploid male gametes in Arabidopsis by cold-induced destabilization of postmeiotic radial microtubule arrays.Plant Physiol.16018081826. 10.1104/pp.112.208611

  • 35

    De StormeN.GeelenD. (2011). The Arabidopsis mutant jason produces unreduced first division restitution male gametes through a parallel/fused spindle mechanism in meiosis II.Plant Physiol.15514031415. 10.1104/pp.110.170415

  • 36

    De StormeN.GeelenD. (2013). Sexual polyploidization in plants–cytological mechanisms and molecular regulation.New Phytol.198670684. 10.1111/nph.12184

  • 37

    d’ErfurthI.JolivetS.FrogerN.CatriceO.NovatchkovaM.SimonM.et al (2008). Mutations in AtPS1 (Arabidopsis thaliana Parallel spindle 1) lead to the production of diploid pollen grains.PLoS Genet4:e1000274. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000274

  • 38

    DewitteA.EeckhautT.van HuylenbroeckJ.van BockstaeleE. (2009). Occurrence of viable unreduced pollen in a Begonia collection.Euphytica1688194. 10.1007/s10681-009-9891-x

  • 39

    DewitteA.EeckhautT.van HuylenbroeckJ.van BockstaeleE. (2010a). Induction of 2n pollen formation in Begonia by trifluralin and N2O treatments.Euphytica171283293. 10.1007/s10681-009-0060-z

  • 40

    DewitteA.EeckhautT.van HuylenbroeckJ.van BockstaeleE. (2010b). Meiotic aberrations during 2n pollen formation in Begonia.Heredity104215223. 10.1038/hdy.2009.111

  • 41

    DewitteA.van LaereK.van HuylenbroeckJ. (2012). “Use of 2n gametes in plant breeding,” in Plant Breeding, ed.AbdurakhmonovI. (Rijeka: InTech), 5986. 10.1007/s00299-013-1534-y

  • 42

    DhimanM. R.MoudgilS.ParkashC.KumarR.KumarS.SindhuS. S.et al (2019). Analysis of nuclear DNA content and ploidy levels in 3x × 4x Lilium (Lilium × elegans L.) progenies by flow cytometry.Isr. J. Plant Sci.66127135. 10.1163/22238980-00001054

  • 43

    EckenwalderJ. E.BrownB. P. (1986). Polyploid speciation in hybrid morning glories of Ipomoea L. sect. Quamoclit Griseb.Can. J. Genet. Cytol.281720. 10.1139/g86-004

  • 44

    El MokademH.CrespelL.MeynetJ.GudinS. (2002a). The occurrence of 2n-pollen and the origin of sexual polyploids in dihaploid roses (Rosa hybrida L.).Euphytica125169177. 10.1023/a:1015830803459

  • 45

    El MokademH.MeynetJ.CrespelL. (2002b). The occurrence of 2n eggs in the dihaploids derived from Rosa hybrida L.Euphytica124327332. 10.1023/a:1015781606511

  • 46

    EngW. H.HoW. S. (2019). Polyploidization using colchicine in horticultural plants: a review.Sci. Hortic.246604617. 2018.11.010 10.1016/j.scienta

  • 47

    FedorovaN. J. (1934). Polyploid inter-specific hybrids in the genus Fragaria.Genetica16524541. 10.1007/BF01984746

  • 48

    FengZ.LiuR. F.JiaG. X. (2012). Induction of 2n pollens by Trifluralin in Longiflorum x Asiatic hybrid (Lillium).Acta Agri. Boreali Occidentallis Sin.21153157.

  • 49

    FernandezA.ReyH.Solis NeffaV. G. (2010). Evolutionary relationships between the diploid Turnera grandiflora and the octoploid T. fernandezii (Turneraceae).Ann. Bot. Fennici.47321329. 10.5735/085.047.0501

  • 50

    GajewskiW. (1953). A fertile amphipolyploid hybrid of Geitn1 rivale with G. muacroplylutin.Acta Soc. Bot. Pol.22411439. 10.5586/asbp.1953.027

  • 51

    Gomez-RodriguezV. M.Rodriguez-GarayB.Barba-GonzalezR. (2012). Meiotic restitution mechanisms involved in the formation of 2n pollen in Agave tequilana Weber and Agave angustifolia Haw.Springerplus1:17. 10.1186/2193-1801-1-17

  • 52

    GuoH. R.DuG. H.HuangZ. T.XieL.WeiQ.ZhangZ. S. (2021). 2n male gametogenesis and its cytological mechanism in hybrids of Cymbidium sinense x C. lancifolium.J. Huazhong Agri. Univ.40152158.

  • 53

    GuoL.XuW.ZhangY.ZhangJ.WeiZ. (2017). Inducing triploids and tetraploids with high temperatures in Populus sect Tacamahaca.Plant Cell Rep.36313326. 10.1007/s00299-016-2081-0

  • 54

    HaanA. D. E.MaceiraN. O.LumaretR.DelayJ. (1992). Production of 2n gametes in diploid subspecies of Dactylis glomerata L. 2. Occurrence and frequency of 2n eggs.Ann. Bot.4:4. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088351

  • 55

    HaegemanJ. (1979). Tuberous Begonias: Origin and Development. Vaduz: J. Cramer.

  • 56

    HarlanJ. R.DeWetJ. M. J. (1975). On ö. Winge and a prayer: the origins of polyploidy.Bot. Rev.41361390. 10.1007/bf02860830

  • 57

    HayashiM.KatoJ.OhashiH.MiiM. (2007). Variation of ploidy level in inter-section hybrids obtained by reciprocal crosses between tetraploid Primula denticulata (2n = 4x = 44) and diploid P. rosea (2n = 2x = 22).J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.82510. 10.1080/14620316.2007.11512191

  • 58

    HayashiM.KatoJ.OhashiH.MiiM. (2009). Unreduced 3x gamete formation of allotriploid hybrid derived from the cross of Primula denticulata (4x) x P. rosea (2x) as a causal factor for producing pentaploid hybrids in the backcross with pollen of tetraploid P. denticulata.Euphytica169123131. 10.1007/s10681-009-9955-y

  • 59

    HennyR. J.ChenJ. (2003). Cultivar development of ornamental foliage plants.Plant Breed. Rev.23245290. 10.1002/9780470650226.ch6

  • 60

    HermsenJ. G. (1984). Mechanisms and genetic implications of 2n gamete formation.Iowa State J. Res.58421434.

  • 61

    HornW. (2004). The patterns of evolution and ornamental plant breeding.Acta Hortic.6511931. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.651.1

  • 62

    HwangY.CabahugR. A.ManciaF. H.LimK. (2020). Molecular cytogenetics and its application to major flowering ornamental crops.Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol.6119. 10.1007/s13580-019-00198-6

  • 63

    IshizakaH. (1998). Production of microspore-derived plants by anther culture of an interspecific F1 hybrid between Cyclamen persicum and C. purpurascens.Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult.542128. 10.1023/A:1006138704856

  • 64

    JonesK.BorrillM. (1962). Chromosome status, gene exchange and evolution in Dactylis: 3, the role of the interploid hybrids.Genetica32269322.

  • 65

    KagawaF.NakajimaG. (1933). Genetic and cytological studies on species hybrids in Quamoclit. Jpn. J. Bot. 6, 315326.

  • 66

    KangX. Y.ZhuZ. T. (1997). A study on the 2n pollen vitality and germinant characteristics of white Populus.Acta Bot. Yunnanica19402406.

  • 67

    KangX. Y.ZhuZ. T.ZhangZ. Y. (2000). Breeding of triploids by the reciprocal crossing of Populus alba × P. glandulosa and P. tomentosa × P. bolleana.J. Beijing Forest. Univ.22811.

  • 68

    KarlovG. I.KhrustalevaL. I.LimK. B.van TuylJ. M. (1999). Homoeologous recombination in 2n-gametes producing interspecific hybrids of Lilium (Liliaceae) studied by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH).Genome42681686. 10.1139/gen-42-4-681

  • 69

    KarpechenkoG. D. (1927). The production of polyploid gametes in hybrids.Hereditas9349368. 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1927.tb03536.x

  • 70

    KatoA.GeigerH. H. (2002). Chromosome doubling of haploid maize seedling using nitrous oxide gas at the flower primordial stage.Plant Breed.121370377.

  • 71

    KatoJ.IshikawaR.MiiM. (2001). Different genomic combinations in inter-section hybrids obtained from the crosses between Primula sieboldii (Section Cortusoides) and P. obconica (Section Obconicolisteri) by the embryo rescue technique.Theor. Appl. Genet.10211291135. 10.1007/s001220000516

  • 72

    KatoJ.MiiM. (2000). Differences in ploidy levels of inter-specific hybrids obtained by reciprocal crosses between Primula sieboldii and P. kisoana.Theor. Appl. Genet.101690696. 10.1007/s001220051532

  • 73

    KatoJ.MiiM. (2012). Production of interspecific hybrids in ornamental plants.Method Mol. Biol.877233245. 10.1007/978-1-61779-818-4_18

  • 74

    KatoJ.OhashiH.IkedaM.FujiiN.IshikawaR.HoraguchiH.et al (2008). Unreduced gametes are the major causal factor for the production of polyploid interspecific hybrids in Primula.Plant Biotechnol.25521528. 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.25.521

  • 75

    KhanN.Barba-GonzalezR.RamannaM. S.ArensP.VisserR. G. F.van TuylJ. M. (2010). Relevance of unilateral and bilateral sexual polyploidization in relation to intergenomic recombination and introgression in Lilium species hybrids. Euphytica171, 157173. 10.1007/s10681-009-9998-0

  • 76

    KhanN.Barba-GonzalezR.RamannaM. S.VisserR. G. F.Van TuylJ. M. (2009a). Construction of chromosomal recombination maps of three genomes of lilies (Lilium) based on GISH analysis.Genome52238251. 10.1139/g08-122

  • 77

    KhanN.ZhouS.RamannaM. S.ArensP.HerreraJ.VisserR. G. F.et al (2009b). Potential for analytic breeding in allopolyploids: an illustration from longiflorum x Asiatic hybrid lilies (Lilium).Euphytica166399409. 10.1007/s10681-008-9824-0

  • 78

    KöhlerC.ScheidO. M.ErilovaA. (2010). The impact of the triploid block on the origin and evolution of polyploid plants.Trend. Genet.26142148. 10.1016/j.tig.2009.12.006

  • 79

    KonyarS. T. (2017). Ultrastructural aspects of pollen ontogeny in an endangered plant species, Pancratium maritimum L. (Amaryllidaceae).Protoplasma254881900. 10.1007/s00709-016-0998-3

  • 80

    KouteckyP.BadurovaT.StechM.KosnarJ.KarasekJ. (2011). Hybridization between diploid Centaurea pseudophrygia and tetraploid C. jacea (Asteraceae): the role of mixed pollination, unreduced gametes, and mentor effects.Biol. Linn. Soc.10493106. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01707.x

  • 81

    KovalskyI. E.NeffaV. G. S. (2012). Evidence of 2n microspore production in a natural diploid population of Turnera sidoides subsp. carnea and its relevance in the evolution of the T. sidoides (Turneraceae) autopolyploid complex J.Plant Res.125725734. 10.1007/s10265-012-0493-7

  • 82

    KreinerJ. M.KronP.HusbandB. C. (2017a). Evolutionary dynamics of unreduced gametes.Trend. Genet.33583593. 10.1016/j.tig.2017.06.009

  • 83

    KreinerJ. M.KronP.HusbandB. C. (2017b). Frequency and maintenance of unreduced gametes in natural plant populations: associations with reproductive mode, life history and genome size.New Phytol.214879889. 10.1111/nph.14423

  • 84

    KroonG. H. (1993). Breeding research in Begonia.Acta Hortic.3375358. 10.17660/actahortic.1993.337.6

  • 85

    KroonG. H.Van EijkJ. P. (1977). Polyploidy in Tulips (Tulipa L.). The occurrence of diploid gametes.Euphytica266366. 10.1007/bf00032069

  • 86

    LaiH. G.ChenX.ChenZ.YeJ. Q.LiK. M.LiuJ. P. (2015). Induction of female 2n gametes and creation of tetraploids through sexual hybridization in cassava (Manihot esculenta).Euphytica201265273. 10.1007/s10681-014-1207-0

  • 87

    LeeY. H.ThamF. Y. (1988). An advanced generation of Aranda orchids.Genome30608611. 10.1139/g88-102

  • 88

    LiJ. Y.WuH. Z.ChenX.ZhouD. (2011). Primary studies on breeding techniques by 2n gametes in colored Zantedeschia hybrid.Chinese Agri. Sci. Bull.27108113.

  • 89

    LiN.XuC.ZhangA.LvR.MengX.LinX.et al (2019). DNA methylation repatterning accompanying hybridization, whole genome doubling and homoeolog exchange in nascent segmental rice allotetraploids.New Phytol.223979992. 10.1111/nph.15820

  • 90

    LiY.ChengZ.SmithW.EllisD.ChenY.ZhengX.et al (2004). Invasive ornamental plants: problems, challenges, and molecular tools to neutralize their invasiveness.Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.23381389. 10.1080/07352680490505123

  • 91

    LiY.WangY.WangP. Q.YangJ.KangX. Y. (2016). Induction of unreduced megaspores in Eucommia ulmoides by high temperature treatment during megasporogenesis.Euphytica212515524. 10.1007/s10681-016-1781-4

  • 92

    LiY. H.KangX. Y.WangS. D.ZhangZ. H.ChenH. W. (2008). Triploid induction in Populus alba × P. glandulosa by chromosome doubling of female gametes.Silvae Genet573740. 10.1515/sg-2008-0006

  • 93

    LiF. L.ZhangZ. Y.ZhangM. X. (1994). Studies on chromosome doubling and triploid breeding of white poplar II: the observation of some morphological characters in triploid of white poplar. J. Beijing For. Univ. 16, 1518. 10.13332/j.1000-1522.1994.02.003

  • 94

    LiaoT.ChengS.ZhuX.MinY.KangX. (2016a). Effects of triploid status on growth, photosynthesis, and leaf area in Populus.Trees3011371147. 10.1007/s00468-016-1352-2

  • 95

    LiaoX. S.WuQ. Q.ZhangZ. J.ZhengX. X.WangL. Y. (2016b). Study on 2n pollen induction and its identification of Lillium oriental.Northern Hortic85660.

  • 96

    LimK.-B.Barba-GonzalezR.ZhouS.RamannaM. S.Van TuylJ. M. (2005). Meiotic polyploidization with homoeologous recombination induced by caffeine treatment in interspecific lily hybrids.Korean J. Genet.27219226. 10.1007/s001220100638

  • 97

    LimK. B.RamannaM. S.de JongJ. H.JacobsenE.van TuylJ. M. (2001). Indeterminate meiotic restitution (IMR): a novel type of meiotic nuclear restitution mechanism detected in interspecific lily hybrids by GISH.Theo. Appl. Genet.103219230.

  • 98

    LimK. B.RamannaM. S.JacobsenE.van TuylJ. M. (2003). Evaluation of BC2 progenies derived from 3x-2x and 3x-4x crosses of Lilium hybrids: a GISH analysis.Theor. Appl. Genet.106568574. 10.1007/s00122-002-1070-6

  • 99

    LimK.-B.ShenT.-M.Barba-GonzalezR.RamannaM. S.van TuylJ. M. (2004). occurrence of SDR 2n-gametes in Lillium hybrids.Breed. Sci.541318. 10.1270/jsbbs.54.13

  • 100

    LiuZ.SeilerG. J.GulyaT. J.FengJ. H.RashidK. Y.CaiX. W.et al (2017). Triploid production from interspecific crosses of two diploid perennial Helianthus with diploid cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.).G3 Genes Genomes Genet.710971108. 10.1534/g3.116.036327

  • 101

    LoginovaD. B.SilkovaO. G. (2016). Phosphorylation of histone H3ser10 in plant cell division.Russ. J. Genet. Appl. Res.208795. 10.18699/vj16.132

  • 102

    LoginovaD. B.SilkovaO. G. (2017). Mechanisms of unreduced gamete formation in flowering plants.Russ. J. Genet.53741756. 10.1134/s1022795417070080

  • 103

    LokkerA. C.Barba-GonzalezR.LimK.-B.RamannaM. S.van TuylJ. M. (2005). Genotypic and environmental variation in production of 2n gametes of Oriental x Asiatic lily hybrids.Acta Hortic.673453456. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.673.58

  • 104

    LuM.ZhangP. D.KangX. Y. (2013). Induction of 2n female gametes in Populus adenopoda Maxim by high temperature exposure during female gametophyte development.Breed. Sci.6396103. 10.1270/jsbbs.63.96

  • 105

    LuoJ. R.ArensP.NiuL. X.van TuylJ. M. (2016). Induction of viable 2n pollen in sterile Oriental × Trumpet Lilium hybrids.J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.91258263. 10.1080/14620316.2016.1148371

  • 106

    MaceiraN. O.HaanA. A. D.LumaretJ. R.BillonM.DelayJ. (1992). Production of 2n gametes in diploid subspecies of Dactylis glomerata L.1.occurrence and frequency of 2n pollen.Ann. Bot.69335343. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088350

  • 107

    MaiY. N.LiH. W.SuoY. J.FuJ. M.SunP.HanW. J.et al (2019). High temperature treatment generates unreduced pollen in persimmon (Diospyros kaki Thunb.).Sci. Hortic.258:108774. 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108774

  • 108

    MalikR. A.GuptaR. C.KumariS.MalikA. H. (2014). Cytomictic anomalous male meiosis and 2n pollen grain formation in Mertensia echioides Benth. (Boraginaceae) from Kashmir Himalaya.TheScientificWorld J.2014:134192. 10.1155/2014/134192

  • 109

    MarasekA.MizuochiH.OkazakiK. (2006). The origin of Darwin hybrid tulips analyzed by flow cytometry, karyotype analyses and genomic in situ hybridization.Euphytica151279290. 10.1007/s10681-006-9147-y

  • 110

    Marasek-CiolakowskaA.ArensP. F. P.van TuylJ. M. (2016). “The role of polyploidization and interspecific hybridization in the breeding of ornamental crops,” in Polyploidy and Hybridization for Crop Improvement, ed.MasonA. (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), 159181. 10.1270/jsbbs.17097

  • 111

    Marasek-CiolakowskaA.HeH.BijmanP.RamannaM. S.ArensP.van TuylJ. M. (2012). Assessment of intergenomic recombination through GISH analysis of F1, BC1 and BC2 progenies of Tulipa gesneriana and T. fosteriana.Plant Syst. Evol.298887899. 10.1007/s00606-012-0598-4

  • 112

    Marasek-CiolakowskaA.SochackiD.MarciniakP. (2021). Breeding aspects of selected ornamental bulbous crops.Agronomy11:1709. 10.3390/agronomy11091709

  • 113

    Marasek-CiolakowskaA.XieS. L.ArensP.van TuylJ. M. (2014). Ploidy manipulation and introgression breeding in Darwin hybrid Tulips.Euphytica198389400. 10.1007/s10681-014-1115-3

  • 114

    MasonA. S.NelsonM. N.YanG.CowlingW. A. (2011). Production of viable male unreduced gametes in Brassica interspecific hybrids is genotype specific and stimulated by cold temperatures.BMC Plant Biol.11:103. 10.1186/1471-2229-11-103

  • 115

    MasonA. S.PiresJ. C. (2015). Unreduced gametes: meiotic mishap or evolutionary mechanism?Trend. Genet.31510. 10.1016/j.tig.2014.09.011

  • 116

    MayroseI.ZhanS. H.RothfelsC. J.Magnuson-FordK.BarkerM. S.RiesebergL. H.et al (2011). Recently formed polyploid plants diversify at lower rates.Science33312571257. 10.1126/science.1207205

  • 117

    MeredithM. R.Michaelson-YeatesT. P. T.OughamH. J.ThomasH. (1995). Trifolium ambiguum as a source of variation in the breeding of white clover.Euphytica82185191. 10.1007/bf00027065

  • 118

    MiyashitaT.OhashiT.ShibataF.ArakiH.HoshinoY. (2009). Plant regeneration with maintenance of the endosperm ploidy level by endosperm culture in Lonicera caerulea var. emphyllocalyx.Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult.98291301. 10.1007/s11240-009-9562-6

  • 119

    MogheG. D.ShiuS. H. (2014). The causes and molecular consequences of polyploidy in flowering plants.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.13201634. 10.1111/nyas.12466

  • 120

    NakatoN.MasuyamaS. (2021). Polyploid progeny from triploid hybrids of Phegopteris decursivepinnata (Thelypteridaceae).J. Plant Res.134195208. 10.1007/s10265-021-01255-x

  • 121

    NegriV.LorenzettiS.LemmiG. (1995). Identification and cytological analysis of 2n pollen producers in Lotus tenuis Wald. et Kit.Plant Breed.1148688. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1995.tb00767.x

  • 122

    NegriV.VeronesiF. (1989). Evidence for the existence of 2n gametes in Lotus tenuis Wald. et Kit. (2n = 2x = 12): their relevance in evolution and breeding of Lotus corniculatus L. (2n = 4x = 24).Theor. Appl. Genet.78400404. 10.1007/bf00265303

  • 123

    NiazianM.NalousiA. M. (2020). Artificial polyploidy induction for improvement of ornamental and medicinal plants.Plant Cell Tiss. Organ. Cult.142447469. 10.1007/s11240-020-01888-1

  • 124

    NimuraM.KatoJ.MiiM.KatohT. (2006). Amphidiploids produced by natural chromosome-doubling in inter-specific hybrids between Dianthus x isensis Hirahata et Kitam. and D. japonicus Thunb.J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.817277. 10.1080/14620316.2006.11512031

  • 125

    NodaS. (1986). Cytogenetic behavior, chromosomal differences, and geographic distribution in L. lancifolium (Liliaceae).Plant Species Biol. (Kyoto)16978. 10.1111/j.1442-1984.1986.tb00016.x

  • 126

    NomanA.AqeelM.DengJ.KhalidN.SanaullahT.ShuilinH. (2017). Biotechnological advancements for improving floral attributes in ornamental plants.Front. Plant Sci.8:530. 10.3389/fpls.2017.00530

  • 127

    NukuiS.KitamuraS.HiokiT.OotsukaH.MiyoshiK.SatouT.et al (2011). N2O induces mitotic polyploidization in anther somatic cells and restores fertility in sterile interspecific hybrid lilies.Breed. Sci.61327337. 10.1270/jsbbs.61.327

  • 128

    OkadaH. (1984). Polyphyletic allopolyploid origin of Ranunculus cantoniensis (4x) from R. silerifolius (2x) × R. chinensis (2x).Plant Syst. Evol.14889102. 10.1007/BF00984571

  • 129

    OkazakiK.KurimotoK.MiyajimaI.EnamiA.MizuochiH.MatsumotoY.et al (2005). Induction of 2n pollen in Tulips by arresting the meiotic process with nitrous oxide gas.Euphytica143101114. 10.1007/s10681-005-2910-7

  • 130

    ØrgaardM.JacobsenN.Heslop-HarrisonI. S. (1995). The hybrid origin of two cultivars of Crocus (Iridaceae) analyzed by molecular cytogenetics including genomic southern and in situ hybridization.Ann. Bot.76253262. 10.1006/anbo.1995.1094

  • 131

    OstergrenG. (1954). Polyploids and aneuploids of Crepsis capillaris produced by treatment with nitrous oxide.Genetica275464. 10.1007/bf01664154

  • 132

    PalumboF.PasqualiE.AlbertiniE.BarcacciaG. (2021). A review of unreduced gametes and neopolyploids in alfalfa: how to fill the gap between well-established meiotic mutants and next-generation genomic resources.Plants (Basel)10:999. 10.3390/plants10050999

  • 133

    ParrottW. A.SmithR. R. (1986). Recurrent selection for 2n pollen formation in red clover.Crop Sci.2611321135. 10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183x002600060009x

  • 134

    ParrottW. A.SmithR. R.SmithM. M. (1985). Bilateral sexual tetraploidization in red clover.Can. J. Genet. Cytol.276468. 10.1139/g85-011

  • 135

    PecrixY.RalloG.FolzerH.CignaM.GudinS.Le BrisM. (2011). Polyploidization mechanisms: temperature environment can induce diploid gamete formation in Rosa sp.J. Exp. Bot.6235873597. 10.1093/jxb/err052

  • 136

    PeloquinS. J.BoiteuxL. S.SimonP. W.JanskyS. H. (2008). A chromosome-specific estimate of transmission of heterozygosity by 2n gametes in potato.J. Hered.99177181. 10.1093/jhered/esm110

  • 137

    PiaoM. L.JiaG. X.ZhangD. M. (2020). Fertility analysis and 2n gametes induction of Lilium FA hybrids ‘Jiaoyang’ in short growth period.J. Beijing Forest. Univ.42106112.

  • 138

    PringleG. J.MurrayB. G. (1992). Polyploidy and aneuploidy in the tomatillo Cyphomandra betacea (Cav.) Sendt (Solanaceae). I. Spontaneous polyploidy and feature of the euploids.Plant Breed.108132138. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1992.tb00112.x

  • 139

    PrzybylaA.BehrendA.BornhakeC.HoheA. (2014). Breeding of polyploid heather (Calluna vulgaris).Euphytica199273282. 10.1007/s10681-014-1117-1

  • 140

    RabeE. W.HauflerH. H. (1992). Incipient polyploid speciation in the maidenhair fern.Am. J. Bot.79701707. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb14611.x

  • 141

    RamannaM. S.JacobsenE. (2003). Relevance of sexual polyploidization for crop improvement – a review.Euphytica133318. 10.1023/a:1025600824483

  • 142

    RamannaM. S.KuipersA. G. J.JacobsenE. (2003). Occurrence of numerically unreduced (2n) gametes in Alstroemeria interspecific hybrids and their significance for sexual polyploidisation.Euphytica13395106. 10.1023/a:1025652808553

  • 143

    RamannaM. S.Marasek-CiolakowskaA.XieS.KhanN.van TuylJ. M. (2012). “The significance of polyploidy for bulbous ornamentals: a molecular cytogenetic assessment,” in Floriculture and Ornamental Biotechnology. Special Issue: Bulbous Ornamentals, Vol. 1edsvan TuylJ.ArensP. (London, UK: Global Science Books Ltd), 116121.

  • 144

    RamseyJ. (2007). Unreduced gametes and neopolyploids in natural populations of Achillea borealis (Asteraceae).Heredity98143150. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800912

  • 145

    RamseyJ.SchemskeD. W. (1998). Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploidy formation in flowering plants.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.29467501. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.467

  • 146

    RaviM.MarimuthuM. P. A.SiddiqiI. (2008). Gamete formation without meiosis in Arabidopsis.Nature45111211124. 10.1038/nature06557

  • 147

    RooseM. L.GottliebL. D. (1976). Genetic and biochemical consequences of polyploidy in Tragopogon.Evolution30818830. 10.2307/2407821

  • 148

    SatoT.MiyoshiK.OkazakiK. (2009). “Induction of 2n gametes and 4n embryo in Lilium (Lilium x formolongi hort.) by nitrous oxide gas treatment,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Eucarpia Symposium, Section Ornamentals – Colourful Breeding and Genetics (Leiden).

  • 149

    SheidaiM.AzaneiN.AttarF. (2009). New chromosome number and unreduced pollen formation in Achillea species (Asteraceae).Acta Biol. Szeged.533943.

  • 150

    SoltisD. E.SoltisP. S.TateJ. A. (2004). Advances in the study of polyploidy since plant speciation.New Phytol.161173191. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00948.x

  • 151

    SoltisP. S.SoltisD. E. (2009). The role of hybridization in plant speciation.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.60561588. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092039

  • 152

    StephensL. C. (1998). Formation of unreduced pollen by an Impatiens hawkeri x platypetala interspecific hybrid.Hereditas128251255. 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1998.00251.x

  • 153

    SugiuraA.OhkumaT.ChoiY. A.TaoR.TamuraM. (2000). Production of nonaploid (2n = 9x) Japanese persimmons (Diospyros kaki) by pollination with unreduced (2n = 6x) pollen and embryo rescue culture.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.125609614. 10.21273/jashs.125.5.609

  • 154

    SunP.NishiyamaS.AsakumaH.VoorripsR. E.FuJ.TaoR. (2021). Genomics-based discrimination of 2n gamete formation mechanisms in polyploids: a case study in nonaploid Diospyros kaki ‘Akiou’.G3 Genes Genom. Genet.11:jkab188. 10.1093/g3journal/jkab188

  • 155

    TakahashiC.LeitchI. J.RyanA.BennettM. D.BrandhamP. E. (1997). The use of genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) to show transmission of recombinant chromosomes by a partially fertile bigeneric hybrid, Gasteria lutzii x Aloe aristata (Aloaceae), to its progeny.Chromosoma105342348. 10.1007/s004120050193

  • 156

    TakamuraT.MiyajimaI. (1996). Cross-compatibility and the ploidy of progenies in crosses between diploid and tetraploid cyclamen (Cyclamen persicum Mill.).J. Jap. Soc. Hortic. Sci.64883889. 10.2503/jjshs.64.883

  • 157

    TalluriR. S. (2011). Gametes with somatic chromosome number and their significance in interspecific hybridization in Fuchsia.Biol. Plant.55596600. 10.1007/s10535-011-0133-4

  • 158

    TangX.LuoZ. (2002). Cytology of 2n pollen formation in nonastringent persimmon.Sci. Agric. Sin.35585588.

  • 159

    TikuA. R.RazdanM. K.RainaS. N. (2014). Production of triploid plants from endosperm cultures of Phlox drummondii.Biol. Plant.58153158. 10.1007/s10535-013-0372-7

  • 160

    TranknerC.GuntherK.SahrP.EngelF.HoheA. (2020). Targeted generation of polyploids in Hydrangea macrophylla through cross-based breeding.BMC Genet21:147. 10.1186/s12863-020-00954-z

  • 161

    Trojak-GoluchA.BerbecA. (2003). Cytological investigations of the interspecific hybrids of Nicotiana tabacum L. x N. glauca Grah.J. Appl. Genet.444554.

  • 162

    van EijkJ. P.Van RaamsdonkL. W. D.EikelboomW.BinoR. J. (1991). Interspecific crosses between Tulipa gesneriana cultivars and wild Tulipa species: a survey.Sex. Plant Reprod.415. 10.1007/bf00194563

  • 163

    van LaereK.DewitteA.Van HuylenbroeckJ.Van BockstaeleE. (2009). Evidence for the occurrence of unreduced gametes in interspecific hybrids of Hibiscus.J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.84240247. 10.1080/14620316.2009.11512511

  • 164

    van RaamsdonkL. W. D.van EijkJ. P.EikelboomW. (1995). Crossability analysis in subgenus Tulipa of the genus Tulipa L.Bot. J. Linn. Soc.117147158. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1995.tb00449.x

  • 165

    van ScheepenJ. (1996). Classified list and International Register of Tulip Names.Hillegom: Royal General Bulbgrowers’ Association KAVB.

  • 166

    van TuylJ. M.ArensP. (2011). Lilium: breeding history of the modern cultivar assortment.Acta Hortic.900223230. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.900.27

  • 167

    van TuylJ. M.De VriesJ. N.BinoR. J.KwakkenbosT. A. M. (1989). Identification of 2n-pollen producing interspecific hybrids of Lilium using flow cytometry.Cytologia54737745. 10.1508/cytologia.54.737

  • 168

    van TuylJ. M.DijkenA. V.ChiH. S.LimK. B.VillemoesS.Van KronenburgB. C. E. (2000). Breakthroughs in interspecific hybridization of lily.Acta Hort.5088388. 10.17660/actahortic.2000.508.10

  • 169

    VeronesiF.MarianiA.BinghamE. T. (1986). Unreduced gametes in diploid Medicago and their importance in alfalfa breeding.Theor. Appl. Genet.723741. 10.1007/bf00261451

  • 170

    WangJ.HuoB. B.LiuW. T.LiD. L.LiaoL. (2017a). Abnormal meiosis in an intersectional allotriploid of Populus L. and segregation of ploidy levels in 2x x 3x progeny.PLoS One12:e0181767. 10.1371/journal.pone.0181767

  • 171

    WangJ.LiD. L.ShangF. N.KangX. Y. (2017b). High temperature-induced production of unreduced pollen and its cytological effects in Populus.Sci. Rep.7:5281. 10.1038/s41598-017-05661-x

  • 172

    WangJ.YouH. L.TianJ.WangY. F.LiuM. H.DuanW. L. (2015). Abnormal meiotic chromosome behavior and gametic variation induced by intersectional hybridization in Populus L.Tree Genet. Genomes11111. 10.1007/s11295-015-0880-z

  • 173

    WangX. L.ChengZ. M.ZhiS.XuF. X. (2016). Breeding triploid plants: a review.Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed.524154. 10.17221/151/2015-cjgpb

  • 174

    WilliamsJ. H. (2021). Consequences of whole genome duplicaiton for 2n pollen performance.Plant Reprod.4321334. 10.1007/s00497-021-00426-z

  • 175

    WingeÖ (1917). The chromosomes: their numbers and general importance.C. R. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg13131275.

  • 176

    WongprichachanP.HuangK.-L.ChouY.-M.HsuS.-T.LiuT.-Y.OkuboH. (2013). Induction of unreduced gamete in Phalaenopsis by N2O treatments.J. Fac. Agric. Kyushu Univ.582731. 10.5109/26157

  • 177

    WuH. Z.ShiF. F.ZhengS. X.ZhangJ. L.ZhouD. (2011). Induction of 2n pollen in coloured Zantedeschia hybrid and obtaining of its triploid.J. Agri. Biotechnol.19662668. 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2011.04.010

  • 178

    WuH. Z.ZhengS. X.HeY. Q.YanG. J.BiY. F.ZhuY. Y. (2007). Diploid female gametes induced by colchicine in oriental lilies.Sci. Hortic.1145053. 10.1016/j.scienta.2007.04.004

  • 179

    XiM.van TuylJ. M.ArensP. (2015). GISH analyzed progenies generated from allotriploid lilies as female parent.Sci. Hortic.183130135. 10.7150/ijbs.6427

  • 180

    XiaoK.ZhengW.ZengJ.WuL.CuiL.LiuY.et al (2019). Analysis of abnormal meiosis and progenies of an odd allotetraploid Lilium ‘Honesty’.Sci. Hortic.253316321. 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.04.012

  • 181

    XiaoK. Z.CuiL. M.WanL.ZhongJ.LiuY. M.SunY. N.et al (2021). A new way to produce odd-allotetraploid lily (Lilium) through 2n gametes.Plant Breed.140711718. 10.1111/pbr.12932

  • 182

    XieS.KhanN.RamannaM. S.NiuL.Marasek-CiolakowskaA.ArensP.et al (2010). An assessment of chromosomal rearrangements in neopolyploids of Lilium hybrids.Genome53439446. 10.1139/g10-018

  • 183

    XuL. Q.ZhangQ. L.LuoZ. R. (2008). Occurrence and cytological mechanism of 2n pollen formation in Chinese Diospyros spp. (Ebenaceae) staminate germplasm.J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.83668672. 10.1080/14620316.2008.11512441

  • 184

    XuW.LuoG.LianX.YuF.ZhengY.LeiJ.et al (2021). Meiotic behaviour and pollen fertility of F-1, F-2 and BC1 progenies of Iris dichotoma and I. domestica.Folia Hortic.33173183. 10.2478/fhort-2021-0013

  • 185

    YamaguchiS. (1980). Identification of ploid level by pollen characters in Primula sieboldii E.Morren. Jap. J. Breed.30293300. 10.1270/jsbbs1951.30.293

  • 186

    YanagiT.HummerK. E.IwataT.SoneK.NathewetP.TakamuraT. (2010). Aneuploid strawberry (2n = 8x+2 = 58) was developed from homozygous unreduced gamete (8x) produced by second division restitution in pollen.Sci. Hortic.125123128. 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.03.015

  • 187

    YangF.Fernandez-JimenezN.TuckovaM.VranaJ.CapalP.DiazM.et al (2021). Defects in meiotic chromosome segregation lead to unreduced male gametes in Arabidopsis SMC5/6 complex mutants.Plant Cell3331043119. 10.1093/plcell/koab178

  • 188

    YangJ.YaoP. Q.LiY.MoJ. Y.WangJ. Z.KangX. Y. (2016). Induction of 2n pollen with colchicine during microsporogenesis in Eucalyptus.Euphytica2106978. 10.1007/s10681-016-1699-x

  • 189

    YangY. X.ZhengW.XiaoK. Z.WuL. K.ZengJ.ZhouS. J. (2019). Transcriptome analysis reveals the different compatibility between LAAA x AA and LAAA x LL in Lilium.Breed. Sci.69297307. 10.1270/jsbbs.18147

  • 190

    YaoH.DograG. A.AugerD. L.BirchlerJ. A. (2013). Genomic dosage effects on heterosis in triploid maize.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.11026652669. 10.1073/pnas.1221966110

  • 191

    YaoP.-Q.LiG.-H.LongQ.-Y.HeL.-G.KangX.-Y. (2016). Male parent identification of triploid rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) and the mechanism of 2n gametes formation.Forests7:301. 10.3390/f7120301

  • 192

    YasuiK. (1931). Cytological studies in artifi- cially raised interspecific hybrids of Papaver. III. Unusual cases of cytokinesis in pollen mother cells in an F1 plant.Cytologia2402419. 10.1508/cytologia.2.402

  • 193

    YounisA.HwangY.LimK. (2014). Exploitation of induced 2n-gametes for plant breeding.Plant Cell Rep.33215223.

  • 194

    ZangS. Z.YangJ. M.ZhaoX. H.FuB.ZhangD. X.QuL. W. (2010). Colchicine induced by different processing methods and the concentration of 2n gametes of Lilium.Northern Hortic.1198100.

  • 195

    ZengR. Z.ZhuJ.XuS. Y.DuG. H.GuoH. R.ChenJ. J.et al (2020). Unreduced male gamete formation in Cymbidium and its use for developing sexual polyploid cultivars.Front. Plant Sci.11:558. 10.3389/fpls.2020.00558

  • 196

    ZhangF.YangM. H.GongJ. Q.FengH.GaoS. M.ZhouY. (2019a). Study on 2n pollen induction by colchicine in rose variety ‘Old Brush’.Acta Bot. Boreali Occident. Sin.39620629.

  • 197

    ZhangJ. F.WeiZ. Z.LiD.LiB. (2009). Using SSR markers to study the mechanism of 2n pollen formation in Populus euramericana (Dode) Guinier and P. x popularis.Ann. For. Sci.66:506. 10.1051/forest/2009032

  • 198

    ZhangX.RenG.LiK.ZhouG.ZhouS. (2012). Genomic variation of new cultivars selected from distant hybridization in Lilium.Plant Breed.131227230. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2011.01906.x

  • 199

    ZhangX. Y.TongH. L.HanZ. Q.HuangL.TianJ.FuZ. X.et al (2021). Cytological and morphology characteristics of natural microsporogenesis within Camellia oleifera.Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants27959968. 10.1007/s12298-021-01002-5

  • 200

    ZhangY. Y.ZhangX. F.HuangX.ZhangX. Y.YaoP. Q.LiW. G. (2019b). Low temperature increases the frequency of 2n female gametes in the diploid rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex A.Juss.) Müll. Arg.).Tree Genet. Genomes15:23. 10.1007/s11295-019-1330-0

  • 201

    ZhangZ. Y.LiF. L.ZhuZ. T. (1992). Chromosome doubling and triploid breeding of Populus tomentosa Carr.and its hybrid.J. Beijing For. Univ.145258. 10.1007/s11632-005-0022-z

  • 202

    ZhengS. X.LiaoX. S.LinQ. D.LingW. B.GongJ. H.LongB.et al (2017). “Initial study on 2n gametes induction of strelitzia reginae,” in I International Symposium on Tropical and Subtropical Ornamentals, Vol. 1167edsThammasiriK.PanvisavasN.PaullR. E. (Leuven: International Society for Horticultural Science), 157162. 10.17660/actahortic.2017.1167.24

  • 203

    ZhengW. (2019). Analysis on the difference of ‘Original Love’ and ‘Tiny Skyline’, ‘White Fox’ in lily ploidy Hybrids and their Progenies. (MS).Nanchang: Jiangxi Agricultural University.

  • 204

    ZhengX. Q.ZengX. S.ChenX. M.YangG. L. (1983). A new method for inducing triploid of Hevea.Chin. J. Trop. Crops414. 10.9734/ajraf/2018/42469

  • 205

    ZhouJ. J.ZengR. Z.LiuF.YiM. S.LiY. H.ZhangZ. S. (2009). Investigation on chromosome ploidy of the hybrids of Phalaenopsis polyploids.Acta Hortic.3614911497. 10.16420/j.issn.0513

  • 206

    ZhouQ.WuJ.SangY. R.ZhaoZ. Y.ZhangP. D.LiuM. Q. (2020). Effects of colchicine on Populus canescens ectexine structure and 2n pollen production.Front. Plant Sci.11:295. 10.3389/fpls.2020.00295

  • 207

    ZhouS.LiK.ZhouG. (2012). Analysis of endosperm development of allotriploid × diploid/tetraploid crosses in Lilium.Euphytica184401412. 10.1007/s10681-011-0609-5

  • 208

    ZhouS.RamannaM. S.VisserR. G. F.van TuylJ. M. (2008). Genome composition of triploid lily cultivars derived from sexual polyploidization of Longiflorum x Asiatic hybrids (Lilium).Euphytica160207215. 10.1007/s10681-007-9538-8

  • 209

    ZhouS.YuanG.XuP.GongH. (2014). Study on lily introgression breeding using allotriploids as maternal parents in interploid hybridizations.Breed. Sci.6497102. 10.1270/jsbbs.64.97

  • 210

    ZhouS.ZhouG.LiK. (2011). Euploid endosperm of triploid × diploid/tetraploid crosses results in aneuploid embryo survival in Lilium.HortScience46558562. 10.21273/hortsci.46.4.558

  • 211

    ZhouS. J.TanX.FangL. Q.JianJ.XuP.YuanG. L. (2013). Study of the female fertility of an odd-tetraploid of Lilium and its potential breeding significance.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.138114119. 10.21273/jashs.138.2.114

  • 212

    ZhouX.MoX.GuiM.WuX.JiangY.MaL.et al (2015). Cytological, molecular mechanisms and temperature stress regulating production of diploid male gametes in Dianthus caryophyllus L.Plant Physiol. Biochem.97255263. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.10.003

  • 213

    ZhouX. H.SuY.YangX. M.ZhangY. P.LiS. C.GuiM.et al (2017). The biological characters and polyploidy of progenies in hybridization in 4x-2x crosses in Dianthus caryophyllus.Euphytica213:118. 10.1007/s10681-017-1898-0

  • 214

    ZhuJ.LiuY. Y.ZengR. Z.LiY. H.GuoH. R.XieL.et al (2014). Preliminarily study on formation and cytological mechanism of unreduced male gametes in different ploidy Phalaenopsis.Acta Hortic. Sin.4121322138.

  • 215

    ZlesakD. C.ThillC. A.AndersonN. O. (2005). Trifluralin-mediated polyploidization of Rosa chinensis minima (Sims) Voss seedlings.Euphytica141281290. 10.1007/s10681-005-7512-x

Summary

Keywords

unreduced gametes, sexual polyploidization, plant breeding, ornamental plants, polyploid cultivars

Citation

Xie L, Ke L, Lu X, Chen J and Zhang Z (2022) Exploiting Unreduced Gametes for Improving Ornamental Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 13:883470. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.883470

Received

25 February 2022

Accepted

27 April 2022

Published

06 June 2022

Volume

13 - 2022

Edited by

Diego Rubiales, Institute for Sustainable Agriculture (CSIC), Spain

Reviewed by

Annalisa Giovannini, Council for Agricultural and Economics Research (CREA), Italy; Tae-Soo Jang, Chungnam National University, South Korea

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Jianjun Chen, Zhi-sheng Zhang,

This article was submitted to Plant Breeding, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics