Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 20 July 2023
Sec. Plant Breeding
This article is part of the Research Topic IPPS 2022 - Plant Phenotyping for a Sustainable Future View all 14 articles

A high-throughput phenotyping assay for precisely determining stalk crushing strength in large-scale sugarcane germplasm

Fumin MaFumin Ma1Yinjuan Shen,Yinjuan Shen1,2De SuDe Su1Muhammad AdnanMuhammad Adnan1Maoyao WangMaoyao Wang1Fuhong JiangFuhong Jiang1Qian HuQian Hu1Xiaoru ChenXiaoru Chen1Guanyong HeGuanyong He1Wei YaoWei Yao1Muqing Zhang*Muqing Zhang1*Jiangfeng Huang*Jiangfeng Huang1*
  • 1State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology, Ministry Co-sponsored Collaborative Innovation Center of Canesugar Industry, Academy of Sugarcane and Sugar Industry, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
  • 2Guangxi China-ASEAN Youth Industrial Park, Chongzuo Agricultural Hi-tech Industry Demo Zone, Chongzuo, Guangxi, China

Sugarcane is a major industrial crop around the world. Lodging due to weak mechanical strength is one of the main problems leading to huge yield losses in sugarcane. However, due to the lack of high efficiency phenotyping methods for stalk mechanical strength characterization, genetic approaches for lodging-resistant improvement are severely restricted. This study attempted to apply near-infrared spectroscopy high-throughput assays for the first time to estimate the crushing strength of sugarcane stalks. A total of 335 sugarcane samples with huge variation in stalk crushing strength were collected for online NIRS modeling. A comprehensive analysis demonstrated that the calibration and validation sets were comparable. By applying a modified partial least squares method, we obtained high-performance equations that had large coefficients of determination (R2 > 0.80) and high ratio performance deviations (RPD > 2.4). Particularly, when the calibration and external validation sets combined for an integrative modeling, we obtained the final equation with a coefficient of determination (R2) and ratio performance deviation (RPD) above 0.9 and 3.0, respectively, demonstrating excellent prediction capacity. Additionally, the obtained model was applied for characterization of stalk crushing strength in large-scale sugarcane germplasm. In a three-year study, the genetic characteristics of stalk crushing strength were found to remain stable, and the optimal sugarcane genotypes were screened out consistently. In conclusion, this study offers a feasible option for a high-throughput analysis of sugarcane mechanical strength, which can be used for the breeding of lodging resistant sugarcane and beyond.

Introduction

In crops, lodging is one of the major problems that affect growth and potential yield (Guo et al., 2021). Generally, stalk lodging and root lodging constitute the two most common forms of lodging (Zhang et al., 2016). The term root lodging refers to the entire plant falling to the ground without being bent by the stalk, whereas stalk lodging refers to the stalk inclines and bends at different angles (Berry et al., 2003).

As one of the most commonly grown C4-type industrial crops, sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is known for its high photosynthesis efficiency and high yield (Swapna and Kumar, 2017). However, due to its stalk-harvesting nature, sugarcane faces a much higher risk of lodging, which results in a huge decrease in yield, as well as difficulties with mechanical harvesting, increasing the cost of production (van Heerden et al., 2015). It has been documented that sugarcane lodging is influenced by the environment and phenotype, as well as number of canopy leaves, planting depth, center of gravity height, and stalk hardness (Park et al., 2005; Babu et al., 2010; van Heerden et al., 2010). Specifically, from the perspective of genetic bias, mechanical strength appears to be the most important factor affecting stalk lodging resistance (Xie et al., 2022). It has been shown that stalk mechanical strength can be used as an important index to predict lodging risk, and that bending strength and rind penetrometer resistance (RPR) can reflect stalk mechanical strength (Zhang et al., 2019). A combination of crushing strength, rind penetrometer resistance (RPR), and bending strength has been used to determine the relationship between stalk mechanical strength and lodging (Stubbs et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Shao et al., 2021). In a recent study, we have demonstrated that rind penetrometer resistance (RPR) and breaking force can be used to determine the mechanical strength of sugarcane stalks (Shen et al., 2021). However, it is important to realize that rind penetrometer resistance (RPR) alone cannot properly reflect stalk lodging resistance because it ignores the contributions from the stalk’s cross-sectional area and vascular bundles (Robertson et al., 2016). Particularly, laboratory-based mechanical phenotyping requires a significant amount of time and therefore cannot be used for large-scale genetic screening projects. Hence, it is essential to develop high-throughput assays for measuring the stalk mechanical strength of sugarcane onto a global scale.

The near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a very efficient method that has been widely used for high-throughput determine various chemical and biochemical structures of agricultural crop (Washburn et al., 2013). For instances, NIRS has been used for high-throughput predicting fiber and nutrient content of dryland cereal cultivars (Brenna and Berardo, 2004; Stubbs et al., 2010), phenotyping of moisture and amylose content in maize (Wang et al., 2019; Dong et al., 2021), evaluating the composition of carbohydrates in soybean (Leite et al., 2020; Singh et al., 2021), detecting biomass of plant root mixtures (Roumet et al., 2006), analyzing available P contents in soils to aid fertilization (Patzold et al., 2020), as well as determining the internal quality and physiological maturity in the fruit (Cunha et al., 2016; de Carvalho et al., 2019; Minas et al., 2021). In our previous studies, the NIRS has been successfully applied for stalk quality determination (Wang et al., 2021), cell wall features and lignocellulose digestibility characterization in sugarcane (Li et al., 2021; Adnan et al., 2022). Notably, in a recent study, we have also successfully implemented the NIRS for assessing the mechanical strength of sugarcane stalks by measuring the rind penetrometer resistance (RPR) and breaking force (Shen et al., 2022).

As a coupled complementary exploration, this study aimed to establish a set of methods for high-throughput phenotyping of sugarcane crushing strength. Due to the large number of diverse sugarcane germplasms collected, a precise online NIRS assay was developed using chemometric analysis. After three years of testing in large-scale sugarcane germplasm, the NIRS model exhibited stable and reliable performance, enabling the optimal germplasm to be selected. Therefore, this study provided a reliable strategy for crushing strength determination, which could be integrated with our previous studies for lodging resistant aimed precision breeding in sugarcane.

Materials and methods

Experimental site and sugarcane planting

This experiment was conducted at the Fusui experimental field located at Guangxi University (107° 47′17.66′′ E, 22° 31′ 5.85′′ N), and the soil type is loam. As a subtropical monsoon climate, there are 1050 - 1300 mm of precipitation annually, a mean annual temperature of 21.3 - 22.80°C, and a mean annual sunshine of 1693 hours (data source: http://www.gxcounty.com/pindao/112287/). We utilized a randomized block design to plant the sugarcane genotypes at three identical experimental field plots of 5 m row length, 2 m row spacing, and 0.6 m depth. A total of 860 sugarcane germplasm collected from all over China were planted in each planting plot, of which 416 core germplasm samples were selected for crushing strength characterization in this study. All sugarcane germplasm were planted in May 2019 with basal fertilizer (organic-inorganic fertilizer 12-6-7, 750 kg ha-1), tillering fertilizer (NPK 20-10-10, 300 kg ha-1) and jointing fertilizer (NPK 20-10-10, 1500 kg ha-1). For the fertilization of ratoon sugarcane, urea (150 kg ha-1) and KCl (150 kg ha-1) were applied in April and August, and compound fertilizer (NPK 15-15-15, 1875kg ha-1) was applied in May. Pest control was not applied throughout the growing period, but irrigation and weeding were performed as necessary.

Assay of stalk crushing strength in sugarcane population

An electronic universal testing machine, DNS-20 (Sinotest Equipment Co., Ltd, China), was used to measure the stalk crushing strength. For each sugarcane genotype, the 15th internode was selected to measure stalk crushing strength (kN) (Shen et al., 2021). In summary, the sugarcane stalk was arranged horizontally on the stage to permit direct compression of the internodes by a circular probe of 90 mm diameter. The movement of probe consisted of four processes (descent, gap elimination, compression, lifting). In order to maximize test efficiency and data accuracy, we set the speed of the four processes at 500 mm/min, 150 mm/min, 150 mm/min, 500 mm/min, respectively. The load cell collected force data every 100 ms. Three biological replicates were performed for each genotype planted in each experimental field plot. The mechanical data were recorded and analyzed using the TestExpert software (version 3.2).

Online NIRS data collection

During the maturity period, 383, 368, and 376 genotypes of sugarcane germplasm were collected from three planting plots in November 2021 for online NIRS modeling. The online NIRS data were collected by a well-established method previously described by Li et al. (2021) with minor modification. Briefly, for each genotype, three plants were randomly selected, and leaves and young tips were removed and immediately shredded using DM540 (IRBI Machines and Equipment Ltd, Brazil). The shredded sugarcane sample was blended and transmitted via CPS (Cane presentation system, Bruker Optik GmbH, Germany). The spectral was collected through MATRIX-F (Bruker Optik GmbH, Germany) online system. A full scanning mode was used to scan the shredded samples, with a wavelength range of 4000 to 10000 cm-1 in 4 cm-1 steps. The absorbance values of the spectra were recorded in log(1/R), where R is the reflectance of sample. To provide a more comprehensive analysis, the OPUS software automatically averaged the online reflectance values obtained. A standard equipped in Q413 sensor of MATRIX-F was scanned every one hour for instrument correction.

NIRS pretreatments and modeling

The spectral data were collected and analyzed using the OPUS software. Before modeling, the samples were randomly divided into calibration and validation sets in a roughly 4:1 ratio, which was used for modeling and external validation, respectively. Pretreatment of spectral data was performed in order to minimize the risk of physical disturbance. To obtain the optimal spectral region for modeling, OPUS software used ten spectral pretreatment methods in combination to divide the NIRS spectrum into multiple sections (Wang et al., 2021), including constant offset elimination (COE), straight-line subtraction (SSL), standard normal variate (SNV), Min-Max normalization (MMN), multivariate scattering correction (MSC), first derivative (FD), second derivative (SED), combination of the first derivative and straight-line subtraction (FD+SSL), standard normal variate (FD+SNV), and multiplicative scattering correction (FD+MSC). A principal component analysis (PCA) of the raw spectral data was conducted to determine the distribution of spectral groups, and outlier samples were excluded based on GH values (> 3.0). Based on the partial least squares (PLS) method, the calibration equations were generated by combining the selected samples with the optimal parameters. A default setting in OPUS software was used to select the wavelength range. A combination in terms of wavelength range selection and spectrum pretreatment was made to obtain calibration models in PLS analysis (Li et al., 2021; Adnan et al., 2022). Internal cross-validation and external validation of the equations were used to evaluate the performance of the model (Williams and Sobering, 1996). Finally, the optimal equation was selected based on high coefficient of determination (R2c/R2cv/R2ev), ratio of prediction to deviation (RPD), and low root mean square error (RMSEC/RMSECV/RMSEP) from calibration/internal cross-validation/external validation.

Application of the model in sugarcane population

A total of 336 samples of sugarcane were harvested at maturation in three years (2019, 2020, and 2021), the NIR spectra were online collected as described above. Based on our established model in the year of 2021, the acquired spectral data was analyzed with the help of the OPUS software to obtain the predicted stalk crushing strength across these three years. Samples with GH > 3.0 were considered outlier based on principal component analysis. After excluding all outliers, sugarcane germplasm with high and low stalk crushing strength was screened out.

Results

Accurate determination of stalk crushing strength in sugarcane

For a precise and reliable determination of stalk mechanical strength, the 15th internode of the sugarcane stalk was selected to determine crushing strength at maturity. In detail, the selected internode was placed horizontally in the middle of the stage and compressed by a probe with a threshold force of 4 kN (Figure 1A). As illustrated in Figure 1B, when a certain amount of pressure is applied to the cane stem, cracks begin to appear along its axis. The internodes ruptured when a continuous compressive force was applied to the internodes up to the threshold, causing irreversible morphological changes (Figure 1C). In the course of this process, TestExpert software generated a compression force curve with multiple peaks (Figure 1D). Remarkably, the curve showed three compressive states (elasticity, yield, compaction strengthening) (Sun et al., 2022). For the purpose of verifying the reliability of each peak, ten randomly selected sugarcane samples were tested for compressive force. A similar fluctuating change in the compressive force between the same samples was observed (Figure S1), consistent with the results observed in maize (Kovacs and Kerenyi, 2019; Zhang et al., 2020). Noteworthy, the relative standard deviation (RSD) value of the first peak was significantly less than that of the other peaks (Figure 1E; Table S1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Laboratory analytical method for stalk crushing strength determination in sugarcane. (A) Schematic diagram of sugarcane crushing strength determination. (B, C) Morphological changes of internode at the moment of cracks appeared (B) and complete ruptured (C), bars = 3 cm. (D) Compression force curve with multiple peaks for crushing strength determination. S1-S3: three compressive states (elasticity, yield, compaction strengthening); Red dots represent the detected peaks; X1 and X2 represent the key steps as described in B and C, respectively; (E) Comparative analysis of each detected peaks in the compressive force curves in ten representative sugarcane samples. RSD: relative standard deviation. (F) Comparative analysis of the first peak between two groups of ten representative sugarcane genotypes. Different letters indicated statistically significant differences among these genotypes via one-way ANOVA and LSD test at α ≤ 0.05 level; *** indicated statistically significant different between the two groups at p < 0.001 level. H1-H5 and L1-L5 represented five sugarcane genotypes with high (H) and low (L) mechanical strength, respectively. Each sample contained three biological replicates.

Further tests were conducted on two representative groups of ten representative sugarcane genotypes, and the differences in compressive force was clearly observed between them (Figure S2). Particularly, a comparison of the first peak of compressive force in the two groups revealed that there was a significant difference between them (Figure 1F), indicating that the first peak was sufficient to identify the high and low samples. Therefore, it was appropriate to assess the crushing strength of sugarcane stalks based on the first peak.

Diversity of stalk crushing strength in sugarcane population

Sugarcane germplasm planted in three experimental field plots were applied for the stalk crushing strength determination by DNS-20 electronic universal testing machine. In detail, 383, 368, and 376 sugarcane samples were harvested at maturity in each of the three planting plots and the first peak from the compressive force curves was recorded (Figure 2A). Among these samples, 306 were common to all three plots and they displayed a wide range of agronomic trait variability (Table S2). Specifically, their crushing strength exhibited considerable variation, although some genotypes varied across three planting plots (Figures 2B, C; Table S3). An analysis of correlations revealed that stalk crushing strength was negatively correlated with internode length, but positively correlated with stalk diameter and internode number (Table S4), suggesting that the stalk crushing strength should be affected by the physiological morphology of sugarcane stalks. Besides, the frequency distribution statistics showed that stalk crushing strength exhibited a normal distribution in all three planting plots (Figure 2D), implying that stalk crushing strength of sugarcane should be a quantitative trait. Notably, upon a correlation analysis of the stalk crushing strengths between the three planting plots, a highly significant (P < 0.001) correlation was observed (Figure 2D), indicating that stalk crushing strength should be a genetically controlled characteristic that could be stably applied for stalk mechanical strength characterization in sugarcane. Therefore, the observed genetically stable large variation of crushing strengths in the collected sugarcane germplasm population allows for reliable NIR modeling and applications.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Diversity of stalk crushing strength (SCS) in collected sugarcane samples. (A) Venn diagram of sugarcane samples collected from three identical experimental field plots. (B) Heatmap and (C) violin chart displaying the stalk crushing strengths in collected sugarcane genotypes. (D) Distribution and correlation analysis of stalk crushing strength of 306 sugarcane genotypes in three planting plots. *** indicated significant correlations at p < 0.001 level. P1-P3: three planting plots.

Characterization of sugarcane samples by online near-infrared spectroscopy

A total of 335 sugarcane samples from three planting plots were used for NIRS modeling. The NIR spectral data of collected sugarcane samples showed continuous fluctuations with a normal range (Figure 3A), indicating a high level of genetic diversity in the germplasm for biochemical traits (Wang et al., 2021). The principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to identify and classify the samples based on their spectrum (Martin-Tornero et al., 2020). To characterize 335 sugarcane samples, the first ten principal components were extracted from the raw NIRS data. Notably, the first three principal components showed a greater contribution rate to the variable explanation (Figure 3B; Table S5), which explained 99.09% of the variance (Figure 3C; Table S5). As a means of better observing the distribution of the samples, the first three principal components were selected in order to generate the 3D scores plot of all samples. Consequently, we observed a relatively symmetrical distribution of sugarcane samples from different planting plots in the 3D plot (Figure 3D), with no obvious differences between the planting plots. According to the results, a quantitative analysis model for stalk crushing strength of sugarcane can be developed using online NIRS.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Characterization of near-infrared spectral in 335 sugarcane samples. (A) Original spectra of sugarcane samples in three planting plots. (B-D) Principal component analysis of NIRS data. (B) Contribution of each principal component to variable explanation. (C) Cumulative contribution of principal components to variable explanation. (D) 3D score view of sugarcane samples by PCA. P1-P3: three planting plots.

Online NIRS modeling for stalk crushing strength in sugarcane

In order to ensure accurate and stable NIRS modeling, sugarcane samples were allocated into critical calibration and validation sets (Payne and Wolfrum, 2015). In detail, a total of 262 sugarcane samples were used for calibration, whereas 73 samples were used for external validation. A wide variation range and continuous normal distribution were observed in all samples used for calibration and external validation (Figure 4A). Meanwhile, calibration set contained the range of the external validation set (Table S6), preventing the predicted value from exceeding the prediction range of model. Since the calibration and external validation sets were comparable, the NIRS model could be calibrated as well as externally validated.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Online NIRS modeling for stalk crushing strength. (A) Distribution characteristics of calibration and validation sets. (B) Online NIRS calibration and external validation. (C) Performance of the integrative final NIRS equation.

With the assistance of OPUS software, the prediction equation of NIRS model was established through a partial least squares analysis (PLS) (Li et al., 2021). A pretreatment of raw spectral data was carried out before calibration in order to minimize the detrimental effect of the baseline (Devos et al., 2014). A series of complex eliminating modeling processes were applied by the OPUS software to optimize the prediction capability of the obtained equation. Performance of equations were measured by the coefficient of determination (R2), the root mean square error (RMSE) and the ratio performance deviation (RPD) (Yang et al., 2016). As the calibration result, the coefficient of determination (R2c) and RPD values were obtained as high as 0.92 and 3.58, respectively (Figure 4B; Table S7). Besides, cross-validation and external validation of the model were applied for model evaluation, resulting in constant high R2cv/R2ev values of over 0.8, RPD values of over 2.4, as well as low root mean square errors of 0.09 and 0.11 kN (Figure 4B; Table S7).

For the purpose of improving the prediction performance of the equation, external validation and calibration sets were combined to generate the final calibration equation (Windley and Foley, 2015). Although the R2c value of the equation did not increased significantly during the calibration process (Figure 4C; Table S8), a higher correlation was observed between the measured value and the predicted value during the internal cross-validation. Accordingly, the R2cv value increased from 0.89 to 0.90, and the RPD value increased from 3.06 to 3.16 (Figure 4C; Table S8), indicating that the new equation was capable of making even better predictions.

Model-based evaluation of stalk crushing strength in sugarcane germplasm

In an effort to evaluate the performance of our model developed for predicting stalk crushing strength in large-scale sugarcane germplasm, the model was applied to 336 sugarcane genotypes planted in three planting plots over a period of three years (2019, 2020, 2021). As can be seen from the sample data, a limited number of outliers were observed, providing evidence that the model is robust and may be applied widely (Table S9). In either of all three planting plots for the same planting year or across different planting years, stalk crushing strength exhibited a similar range of variation (Figure 5A). In 2019, the sugarcane population appeared to have a slight lower in mean value and a substantial variation in crushing strength, which may be a result of the rainy climate in that year. Specifically, in 2020 and 2021, stalk crushing strengths were observed ranging from 0.69-2.13 kN and 0.69-2.10 kN, respectively, whereas in 2019 they ranged between 0.69-1.85 kN (Figure 5A).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 Model-based evaluation of stalk crushing strength in sugarcane germplasm. (A) Distribution of stalk crushing strength in sugarcane population. (B) Correlation analysis of stalk crushing strength between three years. *** indicated significant correlations at p < 0.001 level. (C) Comparative analysis of stalk crushing strength in the screened sugarcane germplasm. LC/HC: representing the sugarcane samples with low and high crushing strength, respectively. Different letters indicated statistically significant differences between the groups using one-way ANOVA and LSD test at α ≤ 0.05; *** indicated statistically significant different at p < 0.001 levels, respectively.

Moreover, we conducted a correlation analysis of the predicted crushing strength of sugarcane samples across different years. It was observed that stalk crushing strength was highly correlated across all three years at a p < 0.001 significant level (Figure 5B), confirming the findings in NIRS calibration sets (Figure 2D), demonstrating that sugarcane stalk crushing strength should have a steady inheritance pattern. It also proved that the model-based characterization of sugarcane crushing strength by means of NIRS is both accurate and stable. Accordingly, sugarcane germplasm with high and low stalk crushing strengths were successfully screened out according to the results predicted by the model. Notably, these screened sugarcane genotypes maintained significant differences in stalk crushing strengths over three years, consistent with the correlation results, further demonstrating that the NIRS model-based method of sugarcane crushing strength analysis is accurate and repeatable (Figure 5C). Overall, these findings suggest that the model is practical and can be used to rapidly identify ideal sugarcane germplasm from large-scale populations of sugarcane.

Discussion

Lodging is one of the major problems that affect the growth and potential yield of agricultural crops (Guo et al., 2021). However, it is challenging to accurately identify the lodging resistance of crops as it is a complex trait affected by a variety of factors (Khobra et al., 2019; Shah et al., 2019). Stem mechanical properties indicate the load-bearing capacity of plants, and therefore can be used as an indirect criterion for selecting lodging-resistant varieties (Yang et al., 2020). Studies have evaluated lodging resistance of stems by measuring their mechanical strength, and it has been found that improving the mechanical strength of stems can reduce lodging risks (Xue et al., 2016; Zhan et al., 2022). In spite of this, it remains a serious problem that there is currently no method of measuring mechanical strength in crops that is both accurate and high-throughput. In our latest study, a precise and high-throughput mechanical strength characterization assay was developed in terms of measuring rind penetrometer resistance (RPR) and breaking force by NIRS modeling in sugarcane (Shen et al., 2022), providing a framework for high-throughput phenotyping of crop stalk mechanical properties. Through a combination of complementary explorations, this study aimed to establish high-throughput phenotyping methods for sugarcane crushing strength.

As a first step toward an effective NIRS calibration, a laboratory analytical method was performed in an effort to ensure accuracy. Owing to an electronic universal testing machine packed with TestExpert software, we were able to obtain the curves of the changes in mechanical properties of sugarcane during crushing (Figure S1; Figure 1D). A comparative analysis revealed that the first peak of the sugarcane crushing mechanics curve provides a stable assessment of the sugarcane crushing strength (Figures 1E, F; Figure S2), which was consistent with the findings in maize (Xu et al., 2017). According to our established laboratory analysis method for sugarcane stalk crushing strength determination, a collection of 306 sugarcane germplasms revealed considerable genetic variability (Figure 2), which provides a significant basis for NIRS modeling. It should be noted that a total of 416 sugarcane genotypes planted in three test plots (with some samples missing in each plot) were tested for crushing strength characterization (Figure 2). However, only 335 of those that showed the best biological replicates across three test plots were selected for NIRS modelling to ensure an accurate calibration (Figure 3). As we expected, a high-performance NIRS model for sugarcane crushing strength characterization was obtained based on our established NIRS modeling method. In particular, the model exhibits stable and reliable prediction parameters in both internal cross-validation and external tests (Figure 4), indicating excellent performance in practice. In spite of this, it may be possible to improve the model further by adding more reliable data.

Besides, the model was applied to a large-scale phenotypic analysis of sugarcane crushing strength over a period of three consecutive years. Accordingly, the model demonstrated good robustness in its application, with only a few samples being detected as out of range (Table S9). In particular, we found that model-based predictions of sugarcane crushing strength showed significant correlations between years (Figure 5B). Material with high and low crushing strengths were consistently screened out from sugarcane population for three consecutive years (Figure 5C). It was further confirmed that the developed model has excellent predictive performance and can be applied to high-throughput phenotyping of sugarcane crushing strength in sugarcane population.

Notably, in our study, significant correlations were found between sugarcane crushing strength and internode length, stem diameter, and internode number (Table S4). This suggests that sugarcane crushing strength is a complex trait that is closely related to the biological properties of sugarcane stalks. This is different from the pattern of rind penetrometer resistance (RPR) and breaking force that characterized in our previous study (Shen et al., 2022). It implies that the application of a single indicator in assessing the mechanical strength of sugarcane stalks to determine the lodging resistant is not desirable. Therefore, the high-throughput phenotypic analysis assay for sugarcane crushing strength determination established in this study, combined with our previously established rapid assays for sugarcane rind penetrometer resistance (RPR) and breaking force characterization (Shen et al., 2021; Shen et al., 2022), can provide a more comprehensive and systematic technical support for lodging resistance targeted sugarcane breeding and beyond.

Conclusions

Using the established accurate laboratory method for crushing strength characterization as well as effective NIR modeling, this study developed a precise and high-throughput phenotyping assay for the determination of mechanical strength in sugarcane. The obtained final equation via integrative modeling exhibited a coefficient of determination (R2) and ratio performance deviation (RPD) as high as over 0.9 and 3.0, respectively, reflecting excellent prediction capacity. Model-based application provided a stable and effective approach for crushing strength trait evaluation in large-scale sugarcane germplasm screening tasks. This study suggests that the NIRS assay could be applied as a highly reliable tool for lodging-resistant targeted phenotyping jobs.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

FM completed the major experiment, analyzed the data, and completed the first draft of manuscript. YS and DS participated in crushing strength determination. MW, FJ, MA, QH, XC, GH participated in sugarcane samples preparation and NIRS data collection. WY revised the manuscript. JH and MZ designed the project, supervised the experiments, interpreted the data, and finalized the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China [2022YFD2301100]; Guangxi Science and Technology Major Projects [Gui Ke AA22117001]; Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2022GXNSFAA035547]; Sugarcane Research Foundation of Guangxi University [2022GZB005]; Guangxi Science and Technology Talent Special Project [Gui Ke AD20297067]; Academy of Sugarcane and Sugar Industry [ASSI-2022006] and Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education [YCSW2023023].

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1224268/full#supplementary-material

References

Adnan, M., Shen, Y., Ma, F., Wang, M., Jiang, F., Hu, Q., et al. (2022). A quick and precise online near-infrared spectroscopy assay for high-throughput screening biomass digestibility in large scale sugarcane germplasm. Ind. Crops Prod. 189, 115814. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115814

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Babu, C., Koodalingam, K., Natarajan, U. S., Shanthi, R. M., Govindaraj, P. (2010). Genetic enhancement of sugarcane (Saccharum sp. hybrids) for resistance to red rot disease and economic traits. J. Agric. Sci. 4, 97–107. doi: 10.4038/jas.v4i3.1648

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berry, P. M., Spink, J. H., Gay, A. P., Craigon, J. (2003). A comparison of root and stem lodging risks among winter wheat cultivars. J. Agric. Sci. 141, 191–202. doi: 10.1017/S002185960300354X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brenna, O. V., Berardo, N. (2004). Application of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to the evaluation of carotenoids content in maize. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52, 5577–5582. doi: 10.1021/jf0495082

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cunha, L. C., Teixeira, G. H. D., Nardini, V., Walsh, K. B. (2016). Quality evaluation of intact acai and jucara fruit by means of near infrared spectroscopy. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 112, 64–74. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.10.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Carvalho, L. C., Pereira, F. M. V., de Morais, C. D. M., de Lima, K. M. G., Teixeira, G. H. D. (2019). Assessment of macadamia kernel quality defects by means of near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Food Control 106, 106695. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.06.021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Devos, O., Downey, G., Duponchel, L. (2014). Simultaneous data pre-processing and SVM classification model selection based on a parallel genetic algorithm applied to spectroscopic data of olive oils. Food Chem. 148, 124–130. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.10.020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, Q., Xu, Q., Wu, J., Cheng, B., Jiang, H. (2021). Applicability of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to predict amylose contents of single-grain maize. Agronomy-Basel 11, 2463. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11122463

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, Y., Hu, Y., Chen, H., Yan, P., Du, Q., Wang, Y., et al. (2021). Identification of traits and genes associated with lodging resistance in maize. Crop J. 9, 1408–1417. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2021.01.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khobra, R., Sareen, S., Meena, B. K., Kumar, A., Tiwari, V., Singh, G. P. (2019). Exploring the traits for lodging tolerance in wheat genotypes: a review. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 25, 589–600. doi: 10.1007/s12298-018-0629-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kovacs, A., Kerenyi, G. (2019). Physical characteristics and mechanical behaviour of maize stalks for machine development. Int. Agrophys. 33, 427–436. doi: 10.31545/intagr/113335

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leite, D. C., Correa, A. A. P., Cunha, L. C., de Lima, K. M. G., de Morais, C. D. M., Vianna, V. F., et al. (2020). Non-destructive genotypes classification and oil content prediction using near-infrared spectroscopy and chemometric tools in soybean breeding program. J. Food Compost. Anal. 91, 103536. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103536

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X., Ma, F., Liang, C., Wang, M., Zhang, Y., Shen, Y., et al. (2021). Precise high-throughput online near-infrared spectroscopy assay to determine key cell wall features associated with sugarcane bagasse digestibility. Biotechnol. Biofuels 14, 1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13068-021-01979-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martin-Tornero, E., de Jorge Pascoa, R. N. M., Espinosa-Mansilla, A., Martin-Meras, I. D., Lopes, J. A. (2020). Comparative quantification of chlorophyll and polyphenol levels in grapevine leaves sampled from different geographical locations. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63407-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Minas, I. S., Blanco-Cipollone, F., Sterle, D. (2021). Accurate non-destructive prediction of peach fruit internal quality and physiological maturity with a single scan using near infrared spectroscopy. Food Chem. 335, 127626. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127626

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, S. E., Robertson, M., Inman-Bamber, N. G. (2005). Decline in the growth of a sugarcane crop with age under high input conditions. Field Crops Res. 92, 305–320. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patzold, S., Leenen, M., Frizen, P., Heggemann, T., Wagner, P., Rodionov, A. (2020). Predicting plant available phosphorus using infrared spectroscopy with consideration for future mobile sensing applications in precision farming. Precis. Agric. 21, 737–761. doi: 10.1007/s11119-019-09693-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Payne, C. E., Wolfrum, E. J. (2015). Rapid analysis of composition and reactivity in cellulosic biomass feedstocks with near-infrared spectroscopy. Biotechnol. Biofuels 8, 1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0222-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Robertson, D. J., Lee, S. Y., Julias, M., Cook, D. D. (2016). Maize stalk lodging: flexural stiffness predicts strength. Crop Sci. 56, 1711–1718. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.11.0665

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roumet, C., Picon-Cochard, C., Dawson, L. A., Joffre, R., Mayes, R., Blanchard, A., et al. (2006). Quantifying species composition in root mixtures using two methods: near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy and plant wax markers. New Phytol. 170, 631–638. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01698.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shah, L., Yahya, M., Shah, S. M. A., Nadeem, M., Ali, A., Ali, A., et al. (2019). Improving lodging resistance: using wheat and rice as classical examples. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 4211. doi: 10.3390/ijms20174211

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shao, H., Shi, D. F., Shi, W. J., Ban, X. B., Chen, Y. C., Ren, W., et al. (2021). The impact of high plant density on dry matter remobilization and stalk lodging in maize genotypes with a different stay-green degree. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 67, 504–518. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2020.1737679

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, Y., Adnan, M., Ma, F., Kong, L., Wang, M., Jiang, F., et al. (2022). A high-throughput method for precise phenotyping sugarcane stalk mechanical strength using near-infrared spectroscopy. Research Square [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2248978/v1 (Accessed November 09, 2022).

Google Scholar

Shen, Y., Ma, F., Wang, M., Li, X., Zhang, M., Huang, J. (2021). Accurate evaluation and mechanism analysis of mechanical strength of sugarcane stalk. Chin. J. Trop. Crops 43, 207–215. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2022.01.025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, M., Bowman, M. J., Berhow, M. A., Price, N. P. J., Liu, S. X. (2021). Application of near infrared spectroscopy for determination of relationship between crop year, maturity group, location, and carbohydrate composition in soybeans. Crop Sci. 61, 2409–2422. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20503

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stubbs, T. L., Kennedy, A. C., Fortuna, A. M. (2010). Using NIRS to predict fiber and nutrient content of dryland cereal cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 398–403. doi: 10.1021/jf9025844

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stubbs, C., McMahan, C., Seegmiller, W., Cook, D. D., Robertson, D. J. (2020). Integrated puncture score: force-displacement weighted rind penetration tests improve stalk lodging resistance estimations in maize. Plant Methods 16, 1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13007-020-00654-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, J. C., Zhao, R. J., Zhong, Y., Chen, Y. P. (2022). Compressive mechanical properties of larch wood in different grain orientations. Polymers 14, 3771. doi: 10.3390/polym14183771

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Swapna, M., Kumar, S. (2017). MicroRNAs and their regulatory role in sugarcane. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 997. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00997

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van Heerden, P. D. R., Donaldson, R. A., Watt, D. A., Singels, A. (2010). Biomass accumulation in sugarcane: unravelling the factors underpinning reduced growth phenomena. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 2877–2887. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq144

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van Heerden, P. D. R., Singels, A., Paraskevopoulos, A., Rossler, R. (2015). Negative effects of lodging on irrigated sugarcane productivity-An experimental and crop modelling assessment. Field Crops Res. 180, 135–142. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.05.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, M., Li, X., Shen, Y., Adnan, M., Mao, L., Lu, P., et al. (2021). A systematic high-throughput phenotyping assay for sugarcane stalk quality characterization by near-infrared spectroscopy. Plant Methods 17, 1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13007-021-00777-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Ma, T. M., Yang, T., Song, P., Chen, Z. G., Xie, H. (2019). Monitoring model for predicting maize grain moisture at the filling stage using NIRS and a small sample size. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 12, 132–140. doi: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20191202.4708

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Q., Xue, J., Zhang, G. Q., Chen, J. L., Xie, R. Z., Ming, B., et al. (2020). Nitrogen split application can improve the stalk lodging resistance of maize planted at high density. Agriculture-Basel 10, 364. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10080364

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Washburn, J. D., Whitmire, D. K., Murray, S. C., Burson, B. L., Wickersham, T. A., Heitholt, J. J., et al. (2013). Estimation of rhizome composition and overwintering ability in perennial sorghum spp. using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Bioenergy Res. 6, 822–829. doi: 10.1007/s12155-013-9305-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Williams, P. C., Sobering, D. C. (1996). “How do we do it: a brief summary of the methods we use in developing near infrared calibration,” in Near Infrared Spectroscopy: The Future Waves. Eds. Davies, A. M. C., Williams, P. (Chichester, UK: NIR Publications), 185–188.

Google Scholar

Windley, H. R., Foley, W. J. (2015). Landscape-scale analysis of nutritional traits of New Zealand tree foliage using near-infrared spectroscopy. For. Ecol. Manage. 357, 161–170. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.08.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, L. Y., Wen, D. X., Wu, C. L., Zhang, C. Q. (2022). Transcriptome analysis reveals the mechanism of internode development affecting maize stalk strength. BMC Plant Biol. 22, 1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03435-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, X., Ren, X., Luan, Y., Su, Y., Li, R., Yang, W. (2017). Genetic study on stalk crushing strength of improved maize inbred lines. J. Jilin Agric. Univ. 39, 648–654. doi: 10.13327/j.jjlau.2017.3153

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xue, J., Gou, L., Zhao, Y. S., Yao, M. N., Yao, H. S., Tian, J. S., et al. (2016). Effects of light intensity within the canopy on maize lodging. Field Crops Res. 188, 133–141. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.01.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y. S., Guo, X. X., Hou, P., Xue, J., Liu, G. Z., Liu, W. M., et al. (2020). Quantitative effects of solar radiation on maize lodging resistance mechanical properties. Field Crops Res. 255, 107906. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107906

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Z., Li, K., Zhang, M., Xin, D., Zhang, J. (2016). Rapid determination of chemical composition and classification of bamboo fractions using visible-near infrared spectroscopy coupled with multivariate data analysis. Biotechnol. Biofuels 9, 1–18. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0443-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhan, X. X., Kong, F. L., Liu, Q. L., Lan, T. Q., Liu, Y. Q., Xu, J. Z., et al. (2022). Maize basal internode development significantly affects stalk lodging resistance. Field Crops Res. 286, 108611. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108611

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Liang, T., Chen, M., Zhang, Y., Wang, T., Lin, H., et al. (2019). Genetic dissection of stalk lodging-related traits using an IBM Syn10 DH population in maize across three plots (Zea mays L.). Mol. Genet. Genom. 294, 1277–1288. doi: 10.1007/s00438-019-01576-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, W., Wu, L., Wu, X., Ding, Y., Li, G., Li, J., et al. (2016). Lodging resistance of Japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.): morphological and anatomical traits due to top-dressing nitrogen application rates. Rice 9, 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12284-016-0103-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, T., Zhao, M. Q., Liu, F., Tian, H. Q., Wulan, T. Y., Yue, Y., et al. (2020). A discrete element method model of corn stalk and its mechanical characteristic parameters. Bioresources 15, 9337–9350. doi: 10.15376/biores.15.4.9337-9350

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: sugarcane, lodging resistance, mechanical strength, crushing strength, NIRS

Citation: Ma F, Shen Y, Su D, Adnan M, Wang M, Jiang F, Hu Q, Chen X, He G, Yao W, Zhang M and Huang J (2023) A high-throughput phenotyping assay for precisely determining stalk crushing strength in large-scale sugarcane germplasm. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1224268. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1224268

Received: 17 May 2023; Accepted: 04 July 2023;
Published: 20 July 2023.

Edited by:

Philipp Von Gillhaussen, Interantional Plant Phenotyping Network (IPPN), Germany

Reviewed by:

Dong-Liang Huang, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China
Meng Li, Hunan Agricultural University, China

Copyright © 2023 Ma, Shen, Su, Adnan, Wang, Jiang, Hu, Chen, He, Yao, Zhang and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jiangfeng Huang, hjfjiayoua@yeah.net; supercane.hjf@gxu.edu.cn; Muqing Zhang, zmuqing@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.