1 Introduction
In 1891, an article in the New York Times reported a record setting “enormous” hop harvest in Kent, Washington (Anonymous, 1891a). Kent, aptly named after the renowned English hop-growing region, established itself as the “Hop Capital of the West” during the late 19th century (Meeker, 1883). From 1870-1900, Washington’s Puget Sound ecozone was the United States leading hop producer (United States Bureau of the Census, 1902). The average dry hop yield during this period was a substantial 1,793 kg/ha, significantly surpassing the yields of major competitors like New York, England, and Germany, which averaged a mere 729 kg/ha (Anonymous, 1891a, 1891b). Astoundingly, the Puyallup Hop Company documented an unprecedented dry hop yield in 1891 of 6,268 kg/ha (Anonymous, 1891a). According to a New York Times article, the state average yield for 1891 (2,242 kg/ha) was 449 kg/ha more than the historical average (Anonymous, 1891b). Given advances in hop growing technology since that time, it is worthwhile to note that Washington’s dry hop yield in 2023 averaged 2,146 kg/ha, which is comparable to the 1870 - 1900 average, but three times lower than the 1891 record. The factors behind this historical anomaly have remained elusive for over a century. However, recent reports emerging between 2021 and 2024 offer a potential explanation. By synthesizing these reports, we piece together the unique confluence of events that may have contributed to this remarkable production anomaly. Further research is necessary to definitively confirm the contributing factors. Nevertheless, the Puyallup Hop Company’s 1891 achievement serves as a testament to the potential for exceptional yields under specific circumstances.
What do we know now that will help us unravel this one-time productivity record? Recent studies point to the roles of climate, atmospheric CO2 concentrations, and gibberellic acid as critical determinants of hop productivity. While other factors like soil nutrient and water properties are critical, these likely remained relatively constant across consecutive years. Delving into the roles of climate, atmospheric CO2 concentrations, and gibberellic acid, alongside a critical analysis of circumstantial evidence, advances a plausible explanation for the factors that might have converged in 1891.
2 Climate
Climate is an essential component for hop production (e.g., Zattler and Jehl, 1962; Mozney et al., 2009; Krofta et al., 2017; Forester and Schüll, 2020; Potopová et al., 2021). A large hop yield necessitates a combination of climate factors free of seasonal/daily extremes: cool growing temperatures, plentiful sunlight, a moist atmosphere, and an ample water supply (e.g. Neve, 1991; Rybaček, 1991). During the summer months, the Pacific maritime ecozone of Puget Sound historically provided such a combination of climate attributes. For hops, elevated temperatures have a pronounced effect on decreasing photosynthesis and increasing respiration (Bauerle and Hazlett, 2023). The cool summer temperatures and plentiful sunlight conditions of the Puget Sound ecozone were optimal for increasing hop photosynthesis and decreasing organ respiration (Bauerle and Hazlett, 2023). Furthermore, cool moist oceanic air flowed easterly inland, blowing straight into the region’s coastal mountains. The cool air, laden with moisture, sank. As it descended, the moisture released and became precipitation, creating a plentiful water supply. As such, the Puget Sound ecozone provided a near perfect climate and deep nutrient rich soil for hop production (e.g. Meeker, 1883; Hipple, 2011).
3 Atmospheric CO2 concentrations
Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations have been shown to significantly improve hop net carbon gain. In a controlled environment study, uptake increased as much as 60% at concentrations 285 ppm above 2021 ambient levels (Bauerle, 2021; 2023). Additionally, quantum efficiency was enhanced, lowering the leaf light compensation point by 250 µmol m-2 s-1, which largely increased carbon assimilation in the most fructiferous portion of the hop canopy (Bauerle, 2021). Why is it plausible elevated CO2 concentrations played into the 1891 hop yield record? Seattle and Tacoma experienced remarkable growth in the 1880s and 1890s, partly attributable to the second industrial revolution. Historical documentation indicates a substantial presence of CO2-emitting industries in Puget Sound during this period (La Roche, 1891; Vassault, 1892). Amidst this industrial landscape were agricultural acre-tracts, including the plot that yielded a record hop harvest in 1891. This scenario bears resemblance to CO2 Free-Air Concentration Enrichment (FACE) experiments, utilized by contemporary plant scientists to elevate atmospheric CO2 levels. Relative to ambient global concentrations, FACE experiments notably augment CO2 levels in open-air treatments.
For instance, Figure 1 visually illustrates the CO2 emissions spewing into the open air from one of hundreds of 1891 Puget Sound sawmills (La Roche, 1891). Throughout 1891, Puget Sound sawmills burned copious amounts of CO2 emitting fuel, milling well over a billion board feet of timber (Vassault, 1892). Further adding to their CO2 emissions, the sawmills burned refuse lumber and mill waste on-site due to the land constraints within the bordering Sound (Vassault, 1892). Although no definitive open-air CO2 data records exist to document the concentrations in 1891’s Puget Sound atmosphere, it is reasonable to assume that it was significantly elevated above the global ambient level (Idso et al., 2001). Furthermore, the climate and local topography of the Puget Sound region can act as a detainment for CO2 emissions (Wang and Ostoja-Starzewski, 2004). Rapid elevation changes from sea level to mountainous terrain, influenced by the nearby Cascade Range, combined with frequent inversions, facilitate the formation of katabatic winds, which elevate CO2 gas concentrations (Wang and Ostoja-Starzewski, 2004). Moreover, persistent easterly winds push CO2 emissions close to the Earth’s surface and adjacent to vegetation (Figure 1 inset). Consequently, the Kent agricultural acre-tract site was positioned advantageously, situated directly adjacent to CO2 emissions from steam-powered sawmills along the Sound’s shores, making it a beneficiary of CO2 FACE within Puget Sound. Finally, considering that hop leaves and strobili can substantially increase carbon yield in response to elevated CO2 levels (Bauerle, 2021; 2023), the enhanced atmospheric CO2 conditions likely contributed to the increased yield observed that year (Bauerle, 2024).
Figure 1
4 Gibberellic acid
Perhaps one of the most influential factors related to the enormous hop yield of 1891 may be the result of gibberellic acid application (Bauerle, 2022). Gibberellic acid, undiscovered at the time, is known to expedite the flowering rate and increase the division and quantity of flower cells in short day plants like hops (e.g. Mutasa-Göttgens and Hedden, 2009). Application of low concentrations of gibberellic acid to hop apical meristems have been shown to result in a twofold increase in the number of hops per plant (Bauerle, 2022). From 1886-1895, a massive influx of Asian immigrants arrived in the Puget Sound region. Their unemployment and population peaked from 1890-1900 due to the completion of the transcontinental railroad (Dearinger, 2017). At the time, the city of Seattle’s labor firm - Quong, Chong & Company- contracted floating populations of Chinese labor to work for hop farmers in 1890’s Puget Sound (Dearinger, 2017). Moreover, they were the predominant seasonal agriculture work force for the Puget Sound “hop craze” of the 1880’s and 1890’s (Kopp, 2016). What is the significance of this labor resource relative to gibberellic acids effects on hop yield? Rice, a staple food in Asian cuisine, harbors the gibberellic acid producing fungus Gibberella fujikuroi, a fungus that infected greater than 50% of the global rice supply in 1891 (Hori, 1898). In 1926, a Japanese researcher was the first to discover gibberellic acid in rice (Kurosawa, 1926). Subsequently, in 1935, gibberellic acid isolation revealed that Gibberella fujikuroi naturally produced gibberellic acid (Yabuta, 1935; Yabuta and Sumiki, 1938). Thus, a hormone that promotes hop flowering, carried by a fungus that infects rice, was unknowingly present in hop yards. Furthermore, since 1865, it has been customary for Asian workers to consume rice balls (onigiri) by hand, inadvertently exposing their skin to Gibberella fujikuroi spores (Whitelaw, 2006). Unknowingly, workers could then transmit gibberellic acid via direct contact with the meristematic section of the hop bine when performing the necessary horticulture practice of hand-training each bine to a vertical trellis twine. Thus, training hops to encircle a twine via hands laced with Gibberella fujikuroi served as an inadvertent application of gibberellic acid, a now known hop flower promoting hormone.
4.1 Gibberellic acids mode of entry
Gibberellic acid effectively enters plant tissue in aqueous solution (McComb, 1964). Therefore, early summer rain showers, a common occurrence in Puget Sound’s summer weather, could have played a key role in facilitating gibberellic acid’s entry into hop tissue. Repeated foliage wetting would further increase the timeframe that gibberellic acid persisted in an aqueous state, allowing it to enter hop meristematic tissue effectively and repeatedly. Alternatively, lanolin, a common skin moisturizer, functions as an additional gibberellic acid tissue infiltration agent (Brian et al., 1954). In the late 1800s, lanolin was commonly used as a moisturizer for chapped agricultural worker hands (e.g. Bag Balm, 1899). It would have been commonplace for hop laborers to apply lanolin to their hands when working with hops due to hop dermatitis, a skin rash caused by manually handling hop bines. Moreover, hop dermatitis is exacerbated when hops are handled under damp weather conditions (Struthers, 1953). Therefore, precipitation events and lanolin may have assisted in gibberellic acid tissue entry.
4.2 Exogenous gibberellic acid application
Recently, Bauerle (2022) demonstrated that hop bines have a specific tissue growth stage and application location that optimizes gibberellic acid’s tissue entry and effect on flower production. Although gibberellic acid can enter different types of hop tissue, young meristematic tissue permits maximum absorption into a hop’s vasculature. Furthermore, flower proliferation effects are the most pronounced after exogenous application at low concentrations during the hop juvenile to adult phase transition (Bauerle, 2022). By coincidence, the common horticulture practice of hand-training each hop bine to encircle the trellis twine takes place during the juvenile to adult phase transition. As a result, exogenous gibberellic acid application, together with plentiful plant growth resources, can double the amount of hop strobili per plant (Bauerle, 2022).
5 Edge effect and spacing factors
Two additional factors may have added to the hop yield of 1891, hill spacing and edge effects. Hill spacing was approximately 2.13 m, which provided each plant per two plant hill an approximate 2.32 m2 of growing area; a generous amount of growing space for commercial hop production as compared to a three or four bine hill (Rybaček, 1991). Next, the size of the hop plot was small, approximately 0.4 hectares. The smaller the plot, the greater the proportion of edge effects relative to the total plant population. Edge effect plants benefit from less plant-to-plant resource competition (e.g. solar radiation penetrating deeper in the canopy). Assuming a 6-meter edge effect from the boundary of a quadrilateral plot, approximately 34% of the total 0.4-hectare cultivation area is affected. Supposing a small plot base yield of 3,800 kg/ha (Haunold et al., 1983), plus 40% for GA3 flower proliferation and improved yield under atmospheric CO2 enrichment (Bauerle, 2024), 5,320 kg/ha results. After adjusting for the edge effect, 66% of the plot yields 5,320 kg/ha, while the remaining 34% benefits from a 43% yield increase attributable to optimal lighting within the crown, as documented in Bauerle (2024). Thus, the total yield is calculated as (0.66 x 5,320) + (0.34 x 7,607) = (3,511 + 2,586) = 6,097 kg/ha. The yield estimate is near the 1891 record.
6 Discussion
Environmental conditions of the Puget Sound ecozone, coupled with a deeper understanding of factors that optimize hop yield (Bauerle, 2021; 2024; Bauerle and Hazlett, 2023), and logical assumptions about events that occurred in 1891 at the Kent hop plot may explain how the hop yield record was achieved. Bauerle (2024) combined supplemental CO2 and gibberellic acid application under cool temperatures and high light conditions in a controlled environment. The intention was to simulate the totality of potential hypothesized occurrences that existed at the 1891 Kent hop plot together with the environmental conditions of the Puget Sound ecozone. Although yield did not surpass the record, it came remarkably close: 6,097 dry hop kg/ha versus the record of 6,268 kg/ha (Bauerle, 2024). The recent research discoveries support the notion that the serendipitous combination of optimal climate and growing conditions, elevated carbon dioxide, bio stimulant application, and 1891 events coalesced, producing the hop yield record that persists to this day.
Statements
Author contributions
WB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported in part by the USDA specialty crop block grant program at the U.S. Department of Agriculture administered through the Colorado Department of Agriculture.
Acknowledgments
I am grateful for volunteers Jacob Fritz for assistance with flower counts. Mike Hazlett for technical and mechanical controlled environment assistance. Tom Hinckley and Elaine Poulin for editing a previous version of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
Anonymous (1891a). The hop record broken: The greatest yield ever known was made on Puget Sound (New York, NY United States: New York Times), 10. (1857-1922).
2
Anonymous (1891b). Hop growing in Washington: A large yield and of better quality than anywhere else (New York, NY United States: New York Times), 9. (1857-1922).
3
Bag Balm (1899) (Lyndonville, VT: Dairy Association Co. Inc), 05851.
4
BauerleW. L. (2021). Intracanopy CO2 and light interactions on Humulus lupulus L. net canopy carbon gain under current and future atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Agric. For. Meteorology310, 108621. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108621
5
BauerleW. L. (2022). Gibberellin A3 induced flowering intensification in Humulus lupulus L.: Synchronizing vegetative phase change and photoperiod induction. Scientia Hortic.302, 111183. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111183
6
BauerleW. L. (2023). Humulus lupulus L. strobilus photosynthetic capacity and carbon assimilation. Plants12, 1816. doi: 10.3390/plants12091816
7
BauerleW. L. (2024). Separate and combined effects of supplemental CO2, gibberellic acid, and light on hop quality and yield. Plants13, 1670. doi: 10.3390/plants13121670
8
BauerleW. L.HazlettM. (2023). Humulus lupulus L. strobilus in situ photosynthesis and respiration temperature responses. Plants12, 2030. doi: 10.3390/plants12102030
9
BrianP. W.ElsonG. W.HemmingH. G.RadleyM. (1954). The plant-growth-promoting properties of gibberellic acid, a metabolic product of the fungus Gibberella fujikuroi. J. Sci. Food Agric.5, 602–612. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740051210
10
DearingerR. (2017). Dirty work: Picking cultures and the perils of diversity in the Pacific Northwest. Available online at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/hrss/hrss/hrss_events/16/ (Accessed February 17, 2024).
11
ForesterA.SchüllF. (2020). The impact of climate change on hops. Brauwelt Int.40, 174–178.
12
HaunoldA.NickersonG. B.LikensS. T. (1983). Yield and quality potential of hop, Humulus lupulus L. J. Am. Soc. Brewing Chem.41, 60–63. doi: 10.1094/ASBCJ-41-0060
13
HippleK. W. (2011). Washington Soil Atlas (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service). Available at: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/Washington%20Soil%20Atlas.pdf. (Accessed March 25, 2025)
14
HoriS. (1898). Researches on “Bakanae” disease of the rice plant. Nojishiken Seiseki12, 110.
15
IdsoC. D.IdsoS. B.BallingR. C.Jr. (2001). An intensive two-week study of an urban CO2 dome. Atmospheric Environ.35, 995–1000. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00412-X
16
KoppP. A. (2016). Hoptopia: A world of agriculture and beer in Oregon’s Willamette Valley (Berkeley, CA, United States: University of California Press).
17
KroftaK.MikyškaA.JurkováM.MoravcováL.VondráčkováP. (2017). Determination of bitter compounds in hops–effect of crop year and hops age. Kvasny prumysl63, 241–247. doi: 10.18832/kp201725
18
KurosawaE. (1926). Experimental studies on the nature of the substance secreted by the" bakanae" fungus. Nat. Hist. Soc. Formosa. 16, 213–227.
19
La RocheF. (1891). Frank La Roche Photographs - UW Digital Collections. Available online at: https://content.lib.washington.edu/larocheweb/index.html (Accessed February 15, 2024).
20
McCombA. J. (1964). The stability and movement of gibberellic acid in pea seedlings. Ann. Bot.28, pp.669–pp.687. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083924
21
MeekerE. (1883). Hop culture in the United States: Being a practical treatise on hop growing in Washington Territory from the cutting to the bale. (Puyallup, Washington: E. Meeker & Company)
22
MozneyM.TolaszR.NekovarJ.SparksT.TrnkaM.ZaludZ. (2009). The impact of climate change on the yield and quality of Saaz hops in the Czech Republic. Agric. For. Meteorology149, 913–919. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.02.006
23
Mutasa-GöttgensE.HeddenP. (2009). Gibberellin as a factor in floral regulatory networks. J. Exp. Bot.60, 1979–1989. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp040
24
NeveR.A. (1991). Hops. London, United Kingdom: Chapman and Hall.
25
PotopováV.LhotkaO.MožnýM.MusiolkováM. (2021). Vulnerability of hop-yields due to compound drought and heat events over European key-hop regions. Int. J. Climatology41, E2136–E2158. doi: 10.1002/joc.6836
26
RybačekV. (1991). Hop production (Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Development in crop science 16).
27
StruthersJ. L. (1953). Hop dermatitis. Br. Med. J.2, 726. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4838.726-b
28
United States Bureau of the Census (1902). Twelfth Census of the United States, Taken in the Year 1900. Manufactures (Suitland, MD, United States: US Census Office).
29
VassaultF. I. (1892). Lumbering in Washington Vol. 20 (Seattle, Washington, United States: Overland Monthly), 23–32.
30
WangG.Ostoja-StarzewskiM. (2004). Influence of topography on the Phoenix CO2 dome: a computational study. Atmospheric Sci. Lett.5, 103–107. doi: 10.1002/asl.v5:5
31
WhitelawG. H. (2006). “Rice ball rivalries: Japanese convenience stores and the appetite of late capitalism,” in Fast Food/Slow Food: The Cultural Economy of the Global Food System. Ed. WilkR. (AltaMira Press, Lanham, MD), 131–144.
32
YabutaT. (1935). Biochemistry of the ‘bakanae’ fungus of rice. Agric. Hortic.10, 17–22.
33
YabutaT.SumikiY. (1938). On the crystal of gibberellin, a substance to promote plant growth. J. Agric. Chem. Soc Japan.14, 1526.
34
ZattlerF.JehlJ. (1962). On the influence of climate on yield and quality of the hops in the Hallertau in the period 1926–1961. Hopfen-Rundschau13, 64–64.
Summary
Keywords
beer, carbon dioxide, climate, ecozone, gibberellic acid, Humulus lupulus
Citation
Bauerle WL (2025) Untapped: the 1891 hop yield record. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1539239. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1539239
Received
04 December 2024
Accepted
19 March 2025
Published
03 April 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Takuya Furuichi, Hagoromo International University, Japan
Reviewed by
Florian Ulm, Evolution and Environmental Changes Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Bauerle.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: William L. Bauerle, bauerle@colostate.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.