ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 18 June 2025

Sec. Plant Metabolism and Chemodiversity

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1629166

This article is part of the Research TopicMolecular Architects of the Green World: Genetic, Epigenetic, and Transcriptional Regulation of Plant Metabolism and Chemo-diversityView all 5 articles

Escaping endogenous miRNA post-transcriptional silencing of JrGRF4b enhanced transformation efficiency in woody plants

Baoxin LiBaoxin Li1Mengting PanMengting Pan2Dezheng WuDezheng Wu1Zhimin ZhengZhimin Zheng2Dong Pei*Dong Pei1*
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China

The stable expression of transgenes was critically influenced by post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms in transgenic plants. In this study, we investigated the influence of endogenous miRNA-mediated silencing on heterologous gene expression by introducing walnut (Juglans regia L.)-derived Growth-Regulating Factors 4 (JrGRF4b), disrupting miR396-mediated silencing of replace-JrGRF4b (rJrGRF4b), and Jr-miR396a into birch (Betula platyphylla Suk.). While JrGRF4b overexpression showed no significant improvement in transformation efficiency due to Bp-miR396-mediated suppression, transgenic lines expressing rJrGRF4b exhibited a 2.53% increase in transformation efficiency, along with significantly enhanced callus diameter, adventitious bud height, root elongation, cellular expansion, and shoot primordia proliferation compared to control (**p<0.01). In contrast, Jr-miR396a-overexpressing plants displayed growth inhibition through suppression of endogenous BpGRFs. The results showed that escaping endogenous miRNA regulation by targeted site modification of rJrGRF4b significantly improved transgene performance in woody plants. Thus, comprehensive evaluation of post-transcriptional epigenetic regulation between transgenes and endogenous miRNAs in recipient plants was demonstrated to be important, and targeted escape from such miRNA-mediated suppression was shown to ensure stable and high-efficiency transgene expression.

Introduction

The genetic transformation of plants was recognized for its potential to address major socioeconomic challenges by providing solutions for essential needs such as food, fiber, fuel, and other resources through plant enhancement (Cheng et al., 2024b; Noack et al., 2024). Therefore, ensuring the stable expression and functional performance of transgenes in recipient plants was considered a critical focus of current research in plant biotechnology (Streatfield, 2007). Plant genetic transformation was first achieved in model species such as Arabidopsis thaliana (Lloyd et al., 1986; Bechtold and Bouchez, 1995) and Nicotiana benthamiana (Fraley et al., 1983; Herrera-Estrella et al., 1983), and was subsequently extended to crops like Oryza sativa L (Zhang et al., 1988; Hiei et al., 1994), Triticum aestivum L (Vasil et al., 1992), and Glycine max (L.) Merr (Hinchee et al., 1988), as well as to perennial woody species such as Populus L (Han et al., 2000), Betula platyphylla Suk (Valjakka et al., 2000; Cheng et al., 2024a), and Citrus reticulata Blanco (Sugimura et al., 2005). However, many plants, particularly perennial trees, exhibited challenges including the lack of efficient regeneration systems and low transformation efficiencies (Wang et al., 2025). To investigate the functions of key genes, heterologous transformation in alternative species was often required (Heyman et al., 2016). Therefore, the stable expression of the targeted gene in transformed plants was of critical importance for both the study and application of transgenic plants (Cao et al., 2023).After the integration of exogenous gene into the target plant genome, its stable expression was closely related to external environmental factors and internal plant regulatory systems.

On one hand, the environment was changed, such as temperature, light, and the application of plant growth regulators, can alter gene expression (Chaudhry and Sidhu, 2022; Wu et al., 2022; Sato et al., 2024). On the other hand, studies have shown that once exogenous genes are integrated into the plant genome, they are easily suppressed by epigenetic regulatory mechanisms, primarily including DNA methylation and small RNA (sRNA)-mediated silencing (Kan et al., 2022; Zhang and Zhu, 2025). Especially, miRNA played a crucial role in post-transcriptional repression (Betti et al., 2021). Studies revealed that the introduction of exogenous genes often led to the suppression of corresponding endogenous gene expression, co-suppression, which was associated with miRNA-mediated specific post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms (Chen et al., 2024). Initially, in Caenorhabditis elegans, the 22-nt small RNA lin-4 was discovered to inhibit translation by binding to the 3′-UTR of lin-14 mRNA (Lee et al., 1993). Subsequently, evolutionarily conserved and diverse miRNAs were found widely across eukaryotes, including drosophila, mammals, and plants (Chen and Kim, 2024). On one hand, miRNAs suppressed translation initiation by targeting the 5′-UTR or 3′-UTR regions, thereby blocking ribosome recruitment (Agarwal et al., 2015; Bartel, 2018). In Arabidopsis thaliana, for instance, the miR172 binding sites of several AP2 family members (such as TOE1/TOE2/TOE3, SMZ, and SNZ) were located in their 3′-UTR regions (Karlova et al., 2013). In addition, degradome sequencing identified genes whose 5′-UTR regions also served as miRNA target sites (Gu et al., 2014). On the other hand, miRNAs could induce mRNA degradation through complementary base pairing with transcripts, such as miR156 regulating shoot apical meristem development and tillering in rice via SPL genes (Chuck et al., 2010); miR167 targeting ARF6/8 to control anther development; miR319 modulating TCPs factors to affect leaf and petal morphology (Wu et al., 2006); miR396 regulating GRFs genes to influence cell proliferation and plant morphogenesis (Rodriguez et al., 2010); and miR857 targeting LACCASE genes to regulate secondary growth in plants (Zhao et al., 2015). Growth-Regulating Factors (GRFs) interact with their co-factors, GRF-Interacting Factors (GIFs), which in turn recruited the ATP-dependent DNA translocase Switch/Sucrose Non-fermenting (SWI/SNF) complex to promote chromatin remodeling (Kim, 2019; Liu et al., 2023). This mechanism regulates essential biological processes, including organogenesis, flowering, photosynthesis, and tissue regeneration (Zhang et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2019; Lu et al., 2020). Within this regulatory network, miR396 was identified as an evolutionarily conserved negative regulator that controlled GRF transcript abundance by targeting complementary sequences to trigger mRNA degradation (Baucher et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2014). It has been demonstrated that the GRF4-GIF1 complex protein enhances transformation efficiencies in various annual crops, including wheat, rice, sorghum and watermelon (Debernardi et al., 2020; Feng et al., 2021; Li et al., 2024, 2025). These results suggest that the GRF-GIF strategy is a conserved and effective method for improving transformation across different plant species. In addition, a naturally occurring 2-bp substitution within OsGRF4 was found to disrupt miR396-mediated regulation in rice, leading to increased grain size and enhanced yield (Gao et al., 2015). overexpression of a miR396-resistant form of OsGRF4 was shown to positively influence grain size and yield-related traits in both rice and wheat (Li et al., 2018). Furthermore, a 6-bp in-frame deletion in the miR396 target site of OsGRF4 by CRISPR-Cas9 technology, resulted in significant increases in grain weight and grain sizes in rice (Wang et al., 2022). The cytosine base of the miR396 binding site was edited by the cytosine base editor A3A-PBE in TaGRF4, which disrupted miR396-mediated posttranscriptional regulation and enlarged bread wheat grain size (Li et al., 2025). Therefore, the expression of GRFs genes was modulated by manipulating the miR396 binding site within GRFs mRNA, thereby influencing the genetic transformation efficiency, seed size, and yield of transgenic plants. Similarly, due to the highly conserved of the miR396-GRFs regulatory relationship across eukaryotes, interactions between the target gene and endogenous related genes within the transgenic recipient plants needed to be carefully considered during functional studies, in order to ensure efficient and stable expression of the introduced genes avoid post-transcriptional silencing.

As a major woody oilseed species, walnut has important scientific and application value for gene function (Ji et al., 2021). However, due to the underdeveloped genetic transformation system in walnut, heterologous transformation has been required for functional research at present. The role of the Jr-miR396-JrGRFs module in woody plant transformation remained unknown. Therefore, in this study, overexpression vectors of Jr-miR396a, JrGRF4b, and disrupted a miR396 binding site-disrupted version of rJrGRF4b were constructed and integrated into birch, a perennial woody species with a well-established transformation system. rJrGRF4b escaped post-transcriptional repression by endogenous Bp-miR396 in birch, thereby enhanced transformation efficiency and accelerated the transformation process in birch. In contrast, overexpression of Jr-miR396a targeted and inhibited endogenous BpGRFs genes, resulting in reduced transformation efficiency and delayed transformation cycles. This study established that bypassing endogenous miRNA regulation through target site modification (rJrGRF4b) effectively enhanced transgene performance in birch. These findings highlighted the necessity of evaluating potential post-transcriptional epigenetic regulatory interactions between transgenes and endogenous miRNAs in recipient plants, as the results show these assessments are critical for achieving stable and high-level transgene expression during heterologous transformation.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

Ten-year-old ‘Qingxiang’ walnut (Juglans regia L.) trees were planted in Hebei Province, China. The walnut female flowers and male flowers tissues were collected in April, and leaves, green husks, roots, stems, kernels, and embryos were collected in August for transcriptome sequencing. Matured zygotic embryos were obtained from the superior white birch strain DL-1, cultivated in Harbin with controlled artificial pollination. All zygotic embryos were half-sibling families, and the offspring exhibited stable genetic material with no phenotypic segregation.

Analysis of transcriptome data

Total RNA extraction was conducted using Easy Fast Plant Tissue KitRNA (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). The integrity and purity of RNA were evaluated through agarose gel electrophoresis and UV spectrophotometric. The library construction was conducted the Novogene NGS RNA Library Pre Kit (Novogene, Tianjin, China). The Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and ABI StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System were employed for quality assessment, with subsequent sequencing performed on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform following quality control approval. The clean reads were mapped to the walnut reference genome with HISAT2 software. The RNA-seq data of 8 different walnut tissues can be downloaded from PRJNA721107 (SRR15651918-SRR15651926). Go Annotation of TBtools-II software was used for GO function enrichment analysis. The JrGRFs transcript levels in each tissue were derived from FPKM values obtained through transcriptome data analysis.

Bioinformatics analysis of the JrGRFs family

The AtGRFs, OsGRFs, PtGRFs and BpGRFs protein sequences obtained from plant transcription factor database (https://planttfdb.gao-lab.org/) were used to conduct a BLASTp search of the walnut reference genome. The resultant JrGRFs candidate proteins were evaluated to determine whether they contained a QLQ domain (PF08880) and a WRC domain (PF08879) utilizing the Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/) databases. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted by using MEGA X to construct a phylogenetic tree using a maximum likelihood method and full-length GRF protein sequences derived from walnut, Arabidopsis thaliana, rice, Populus trichocarpa and birch. Branch support was assessed with 1000 bootstrap replicates, and nodes with bootstrap values ≥80% were considered well-supported.

Prediction of binding energy and detection of off-target effects

The secondary structure of the Jr-miR396a precursor was predicted bioinformatically in RNAfold WebServer (http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at//cgi-bin/RNAWebSuite/RNAfold.cgi) by extending 150 bp upstream and downstream of the mature sequence (Meyers et al., 2008). The binding energy between miR396 and GRFs mRNAs were calculated using the IntaRNA online tool, with a mismatch threshold of 0–2 and an RNA bulge size of 0.

Vector construction

To generate the JrGRF4b overexpression constructs, their DNA sequences were obtained PCR amplification from walnut cDNA. Similarly, the precursor sequence of Jr-miR396a-1 was isolated from the walnut genome during the vector assembly process. To prevent changes in the encoded amino acid sequence, seven nucleotides within the JrGRF4b target regions were precisely altered using site-directed mutagenesis primers, with overlapping PCR produced rJrGRF4b sequence (Supplementary Table S1). The resulting fragments were inserted into the pEASY-Blunt Zero plasmid separately, sequence-verified through Sanger sequencing, and subsequently integrated into the pMCP1 plant expression system (contained basta resistance gene).

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in birch

Agrobacterium-mediated birch matured zygotic embryos transformation was conducted based on a modified version of a previously published protocol (Cheng et al., 2024a): The process was as follows: A was washed with flowing water for 48–72 hours and then sterilized using 75% alcohol, 30% hydrogen peroxide, and sterile water in a laminar flow hood. Transformation was carried out using the Agrobacterium strain EHA105, with the Agrobacteria grown to an OD600 of 0.6-0.8. Matured zygotic embryos was cut using a scalpel in a laminar flow hood, then infected with Agrobacterium and placed in co-cultivation medium for dark incubation for 3 days at 26°C. After 3 days, matured zygotic embryos were transferred to a callus induction medium containing basta and incubated under light for 30 days at 26°C. Once the callus expanded, these were transferred to shoot induction mediums containing basta and incubated under light for 30 days at 26°C. Finally, the shoots were cut and inoculated onto roots induction mediums, where they were cultured for 15 days.

RNA extraction and qRT-PCR

RNA was extracted using the RNAeasy Kit (Cwbio, Jiangsu, China). cDNA was synthesized with the PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Beijing, China), and prepared for qRT-PCR analysis. miR396a reverse transcription was synthesized with the miRNAs were extracted by the miRcute Plant miRNA Isolation Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). Jr-miR396a reverse transcription by the miRNA 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (by stem-loop) (Taraka, Beijing, China). Transcriptional levels of genes were quantified normalized using JrGAPDH as endogenous control in walnut. While the transcriptional levels of genes were quantified normalized using BpACTIN as endogenous control in birch. Transcriptional levels of Jr-miR396a were quantified using a stem-loop RT-qPCR method, and normalized using U6 as endogenous control. To ensure consistency and reliability, three biological replicates were included for each experiment. The quantitative data were analyzed using the 2-△△Ct method (Rao et al., 2013). The related primers were listed in Supplementary Table S1.

Paraffin section preparation cell area measurement and blastemates counts

Based on the size of callus, all was immersed in 70% FAA fixative and stored at 4°C. Following standard paraffin sectioning procedures, the fixed callus tissues were dehydrated, cleared, embedded in paraffin wax, and sectioned using the rotary microtome. After sectioning, the samples were dried, dewaxed, stained with TBO, and sealed for observation. Images were captured with Olympus Imager. A2 microscope cameras. Blastematas were identified by dense cell clusters in cytohistology. The areas of dense cell populations were measured using ImageJ.

Survival ratio, regeneration ratio, transformation efficiency quantification

Survival ratio (%) = (the number of callus/the number of embryos) ×100%. Regeneration ratio (%) = (the number of callus with shoots/the number of callus) ×100%. Transformation efficiency (%) = (the number of positive shoots/the number of callus with shoots) ×100%.

Phenotypic analysis

The diameter of the callus was measured by the distance from the center of the callus to both ends, with each callus being measured three times to obtain an average value. For each group, 30 callus samples were measured as biological replicates. Adventitious buds height refers to the height from the base of the lowest adventitious buds to the top of the highest adventitious buds on each adventitious buds. 30 adventitious buds samples were measured as biological replicates. The height of rooted seedlings height refers to the seedlings from the base of the lowest seedlings to the top of the highest seedlings on each seedling. 30 rooted seedlings samples were measured as biological replicates. The rooting rates were determined by the ratio of seedlings with roots to the total number of seedlings after 15 days of culture in rooting induction mediums. For each group, 10 rooting induction mediums samples were measured as biological replicates. There are 10–15 seedlings in each root induction medium. The number of roots refers to the count of adventitious roots emerged from the basal stem segment of each seedling after 15 days of growth in the rooting induction medium. For each group, 30 rooted seedlings samples were measured as biological replicates. The root length refers to the distance from the base of the stem segment to the root tip after 15 days of cultivation in the rooting induction medium. The average root length for each rooted seedling was calculated by averaging the lengths of all its adventitious roots. For each group, 30 rooted seedlings samples were measured as biological replicates.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS19. Data. Statistical significance of the data was analyzed using either the Student’s t-tests or Tukey’s multiple range test. Graphs and charts were generated using TBTools II, Origin2021, Microsoft Excel 2016, and Adobe Illustrator 2021.

Results

Identification of JrGRFs family and selection of JrGRF4b as the focal point

Based on BLASTp (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and HMMsearch tools, 14 JrGRFs family members were identified in the walnut genome after filtering the redundant transcripts. We named JrGRF1, JrGRF2a, JrGRF2b, JrGRF3, JrGRF4a, JrGRF4b, JrGRF5a, JrGRF5b, JrGRF6a, JrGRF6b, JrGRF7, JrGRF8, JrGRF9a, and JrGRF9b basing on protein sequence phylogenetic subfamily classification and chromosome location information. The evolutionary classification of 9 AtGRFs, 12 OsGRFs, 19 PtGRFs, 9 BpGRFs and 14 JrGRFs based on their amino acid sequences showed that these protein members could be divided into eight clusters, including I-VIII. The JrGRFs protein sequences were distributed across clusters I-VI. Cluster I was composed of 6 members, Cluster II consisted of 3 members, Clusters III-V each contained 1 member, and Cluster VI included 2 members. Notably, the JrGRFs of Juglans regia L., which were clustered on the same evolutionary clade, were positioned closer to GRFs of Betula platyphylla Suk. and Populus tomentosa Car., indicating a closer relationship among these families (Figure 1A). GO annotation analysis of JrGRFs genes revealed mappable pathways exclusively for JrGRF3, JrGRF4b, JrGRF5a, JrGRF5b, JrGRF8, JrGRF9a, and JrGRF9b. Subsequent enrichment analysis demonstrated three functional categories: molecular functions (MF), cellular components (CC), and biological processes (BP) (Supplementary Figure S1). In the MF category, 11 GO terms were enriched, among which 9 transcription-related terms (such as GO:0003700, GO:0003674, and GO:0003676 etc.) were annotated to JrGRF3, while two nucleotide-binding terms (GO:0005524-ATP binding and GO:0005525-GTP binding) were annotated to JrGRF4b. In the CC category, 11 GO terms were annotated. Among these, two terms (GO:0005874-microtubule and GO:0005634-nucleus) were exclusively assigned to JrGRF4b, while the remaining 10 organelle development-related terms were annotated to other JrGRFs. In the BP category, 41 GO terms were annotated. The JrGRFs were predominantly enriched in the following plant grow and metabolic pathways (GO:0007275, GO:0008105, GO:0032501, GO:0048366, GO:0048367, GO:0048731, GO:0048827, and GO:0048856). JrGRF4b was primarily annotated with terms associated with plant organ development and transcriptional regulation (GO:0099402, GO:0006351, GO:0006355, and GO:0007017). Additionally, JrGRF8 was found to be associated with light-responsive terms (GO:0009314, GO:0009416, GO:0009628, GO:0009639, GO:0010114, GO:0010218, and GO:0080167) (Supplementary Figure S1). These results demonstrated that JrGRFs were functionally associated with plant growth and metabolism.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Walnut JrGRFs family classification and expression. (A) Phylogenetic analyses of the walnut, Arabidopsis, rice, and birch GRFs families. (B) Transcript levels of JrGRFs genes during the organogenesis of walnut. (C) Multiple sequence alignment of JrGRF4a and JrGRF4b with AtGRF4 and OsGRF4 proteins. Conserved QLQ and WRC domains in GRF family proteins were highlighted using black boxes. (D) The expression of JrGRF4a and JrGRF4b during the organogenesis of walnut. LF, leaf; MF, male flower; GH, green husk; RT, root; SM, stem; KL: kernel; FF, female flower; EB, embryo. The error bars represent the SE of three independent biological replicates (t-test: **p < 0.01).

To investigate the involvement of JrGRFs genes in the growth and development of walnut trees, RNA-seq expression patterns of 14 JrGRFs genes were examined across various walnut tissues. Our study revealed that JrGRFs exhibited different expression patterns in eight tissues of walnut (Figure 1B). Among them, all 14 JrGRFs genes expressed in KL (kernels), FF (female flowers), and EB (embryos). In RT (roots), 13 JrGRFs genes (except for JrGRF5a) showed detectable expression levels; in SM (stems) and MF (male flowers), 11 JrGRFs genes (except for JrGRF5a, JrGRF5b and JrGRF6b) were expressed. In LF (leaves), 10 genes (except for JrGRF5a, JrGRF5b, JrGRF6a and JrGRF7) exhibited expression, while only 9 genes (except for JrGRF3, JrGRF5a, JrGRF5b, JrGRF6b and JrGRF7) were expressed in GH (green husks). The expression levels of JrGRFs genes in KL (kernels), FF (female flowers), and EB (embryos) were higher than in other tissues. In addition, except for MF (male flowers) and GH (green husks), the expression of JrGRF4b was higher than that of the other JrGRFs genes.

Furthermore, two JrGRFs protein sequences, JrGRF4a and JrGRF4b, were identified in the walnut genome, which conserved QLQ and WRC domains with OsGRF4 in rice and AtGRF4 in Arabidopsis thaliana, respectively (Figure 1C). Meanwhile, the relative expression analysis of JrGRF4a and JrGRF4b in eight different walnut tissues revealed that JrGRF4b expressed at significantly higher levels than JrGRF4a across all tissues by qRT-PCR (**p<0.01, Figure 1D). The result indicated that, JrGRF4b might play a more important role in the growth and development of walnut tissues compared to JrGRF4a.

The characterization and expression of miR396 in walnut

GRFs are regulated by miR396 have been identified in different plant species, including Arabidopsis thaliana, rice, and soybean etc (Kim, 2019; Gao et al., 2015; Li et al., 2025). Based on the mature and precursor sequences of miR396 in miRbase, we mapped the Jr-miR396a-1, Jr-miR396a-2 and Jr-miR396a-3 loci to chromosomes 1, 3 and 6 (Figure 2A; Supplementary Table S1). The precursor structure of miR396a possessed a complete stem-loop configuration, with the mature sequence of miR396a located in the stem location (Supplementary Figure S2). But the mature sequence of miR396a was came from different chromosomes. We further predicted that all 14 JrGRFs genes contained the targeted DNA sequence of miR396 conservatively (Figure 2B). There were highly conserved binding interactions between miR396 and the JrGRFs mRNA, and the binding free energy ranges were from -20.18 kcal/mol to -26.29 kcal/mol (Supplementary Figure S3). To further confirmed the expression patterns of the three Jr-MIR396a, relative expression levels were analyzed across eight tissues (leaf, male flower, green husk, root, stem, kernel, female flower, and embryo) by qRT-PCR. The results showed that Jr-MIR396a-1 exhibited significantly higher relative expression than Jr-MIR396a-2 and Jr-MIR396a-3 in all examined tissues (**p<0.01). Especially, the relative expression level of Jr-MIR396a-1 was the highest in ME (male flowers). Meanwhile, we found the relative expression level of Jr-miR396a exhibited significantly higher in EB (embryos) and MF (male flowers) than other tissues. Moreover, the expression pattern of mature Jr-miR396a in the eight walnut tissues was consistent with that of Jr-MIR396a, which suggested that Jr-MIR396a-1 played a dominant role in this process.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Walnut miR396 identification and expression. (A) Secondary structures of miR396 stem-loop precursors. The minimum free energy of the RNA secondary structure was calculated as ΔG (kcal/mol). (B) The miR396a binding site of JrGRFs genes. The miR396a binding site is marked in orange. The value on the right represents the binding energy of miR396 with JrGRFS mRNA. (C) The relative expression level of Jr-MIR396a. (D) The relative expression level of mature Jr-miR396a. LF, leaf; MF, male flower; GH, green husk; RT, root; SM, stem; KL: kernel; FF, female flower; EB, embryo. a, b, c, d, and e indicated extremely significant differences among the groups. The error bars represent the SE of three independent biological replicates (t-test: **p < 0.01).

rJrGRF4b accelerated the transformation process of birch

GRF4-GIF1 has been proven to enhance the transformation efficiency of wheat, citrus, sorghum and soybean. To investigate whether JrGRF4b could also improve woody plants transformation, such as birch. Firstly, we found that Bp-miR396a and Bp-miR396b in birch negatively regulated JrGRF4b mRNA by targeting it conservatively through bioinformatics prediction (Supplementary Figure S4). We created DNA sequence of rJrGRF4b, which was disrupted the Bp-miR396a, Bp-miR396b and Jr-miR396a binding sites in mRNA correspondingly (Figure 3A; Supplementary Figures S5, S6). However, the amino acid sequence of rJrGRF4b was same to JrGRF4b, similar to synonymous mutation. Meanwhile, we designed the following vectors: control vector, Jr-miR396a vector, JrGRF4b vector, and rJrGRF4b vector (Figure 3B). In all vectors, the expression of Jr-miR396a, JrGRF4b, and rJrGRF4b were driven by the Cauliflowever mosaic virus 35S promoter (35Sp), which has been proven to stably drive genes expression in wood plants. Moreover, a 35S-controlled Basta expression module was contained in all vectors to offer glufosinate-ammonium resistance in the transformants (Figure 3B).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. rJrGRF4b accelerated the birch transformation process. (A) Schematic representation of JrGRF4b and rJrGRF4b gene structure showing the BpmiR396a target site. The Bp-miR396a-resistant rJrGRF4b version was introduced mutations (in red) to reduce interactions with Bp-miR396a. The Bp-miR396a seed region (nucleotides 2-8 from 5' to 3') was indicated by the blue highlighted line. (B) Schematic construction of the vectors. The expression of Jr-miR396a, JrGRF4b and rJrGRF4b were driven by the Cauliflowever mosaic virus 35S promoter (35Sp). The Basta represents the expression cassette for the Basta gene, which serves as a selection marker for transgenic lines. LB and RB, T-DNA left and right borders. (C) Overexpression of rJrGRF4b increased birch transformation efficiency.

The genetic transformation process followed the protocol described by matured zygotic embryo of birch infection. In brief, the wounded matured zygotic embryo of birch was infected with Agrobacterium suspension at an OD value ranging from 0.6 to 0.8, and then incubated in the dark on co-cultivation medium for 3 days firstly. Subsequently, the surviving callus were transferred to callus induction medium containing glufosinate-ammonium and cultured for 30 days. The selected and enlarged callus were transferred to shoot induction medium and cultured for 30 days until shoots regenerated. Finally, the regenerated shoots were transplanted onto root induction medium and cultured for 15 days until roots regenerated (Supplementary Figure S7). We observed both control seedlings and transformed with Jr-miR396a, JrGRF4b, and rJrGRF4b showed no growth defects (Supplementary Figure S7). However, there were differences in the growth and development rates among the transgenic plants at various stages of genetic transformation. To further investigated the impact of gene function on genetic transformation, we found that Jr-miR396a-OE-1, JrGRF4b-OE-7, and rJrGRF4b-OE-11 were the highest relative expression levels in callus and seedlings by qRT-PCR respectively (Supplementary Figure S8).

During the callus induction stage, the callus diameter of rJrGRF4b-OE-11 was significantly larger than that of control and JrGRF4b-OE-7 (**p<0.01), with no significant difference between control and JrGRF4b-OE-7 when cultured on the callus induction medium from 10th day to 30th day of development. In contrast, the callus diameter of Jr-miR396a-OE-1 was significantly smaller than the others (**p<0.01, Figure 4A). Subsequently, the callus was transferred to regenerated shoots medium, and the cultivation process from 10th day to 30th day of growth, the height of adventitious buds in rJrGRF4b-OE-11 was significantly higher than that of control and JrGRF4b-OE-7 (**p<0.01), with no significant difference between control and JrGRF4b-OE-7. On the contrary, the height of adventitious buds of Jr-miR396a-OE-1 was significantly lower than the others (**p<0.01, Figure 4B). When adventitious buds were transferred to the rooting medium and cultured for 15th days, the seedlings height of rJrGRF4b-OE-11 were higher than those of control and JrGRF4b-OE-7 (**p<0.01), with no significant difference between control and JrGRF4b-OE-7. However, the height of seedlings of Jr-miR396a-OE-1 were significantly lower than the others (**p<0.01, Figure 4C). At the same time, there was no significant difference in rooting rates and the number of roots between JrGRF4b-OE-7 and rJrGRF4b-OE-11, but Jr-miR396a-OE-1 was significantly lower than control, JrGRF4b-OE-7 and rJrGRF4b-OE-11 (**p<0.01, Figures 4D, E). However, the roots length of rJrGRF4b-OE-11 were longer than those of control and JrGRF4b-OE-7 (**p<0.01), and Jr-miR396a-OE-1 was significantly lower than control, JrGRF4b-OE-7 and rJrGRF4b-OE-11 (**p<0.01, Figure 4F).

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Statistical analysis and morphology of callus cells of transformed with different vectors in birch transformation process. (A) The diameter of callus. 30 callus were selected for each period. (B) The height of adventitious buds. 30 callus were selected for each period. (C) Height of rooted seedings. 30 seedings were selected for each genotype. (D) The rooting rates. 30 seedings were selected for each genotype. (E) The number of roots. 30 seedings were selected for each genotype. (F) The length of roots. 30 seedings were selected for each genotype. (G) Histological analysis of callus cells at 30 DAYs. 20× Scale bars = 50 μm, 5×Scale bars = 200 μm. The blastemates were marked by a red arrow. (H) The areas of cell. 30 biological replicates were selected for each genotype. (I) The number of blastemates. 30 biological replicates were selected for each genotype. (J) Relative expression level of BpGRFs. The error bars represent the SE of three independent biological replicates (t-test: **p < 0.01).

Based on above, whether in callus, adventitious buds, or rooted seedlings, rJrGRF4b-OE-11 exhibited a better growth state than control and JrGRF4b-OE-7, while the growth and development of transgenic Jr-miR396a-OE-1 were clearly inhibited. There was no significant difference in growth condition between control and JrGRF4b-OE-7 compared to the same period. This result suggested that rJrGRF4b had a potential to accelerate the genetic transformation of woody plants, specifically in birch.

rJrGRF4b improved the transformation efficiency of birch

In order to evaluate the transformation efficiency of the different vectors, 1917 mature zygotic embryos of birch were employed throughout the experiment (Figure 3C). For the control vector, 287 out of 486 mature zygotic embryos successfully survived on the callus induction medium, and 197 of callus smoothly regenerated shoots (Figure 3C). Furthermore, PCR analysis was performed using specific primers on the regenerated seedlings and we checked to prove that 176 of 193 shoots were transgenic, resulted in the transformation efficiency (positive shoots/callus with shoots) was 91.19% (Figure 3C). Among them, JrGRF4b improved the transformation efficiency to 91.88%, rJrGRF4b to 93.72%, while Jr-miR396a reduced the transformation efficiency to 86.03%. The above data demonstrated that rJrGRF4b outperformed both the control and JrGRF4b in enhancing the transformation efficiency of birch. Whereas Jr-miR396a had the opposite effect (Figure 3C).

To investigate the differentiation capacity of control vector, Jr-miR396a vector, JrGRF4b vector, and rJrGRF4b vector during birch transformation, the transformation procedure was further divided into two parts: callus induction and regeneration. Of the 472 mature zygotic embryos transformed with the rJrGRF4b vector, 306 formed callus, and 239 of these callus ultimately produced shoots. This led to a callus survival rate of 64.83% and a regeneration efficiency of 78.10%. At the same time, a total of 462 mature zygotic embryos were transformed with the JrGRF4b vector, resulting in the formation of callus in 283 cases. Among these, 197 callus successfully regenerated shoots, corresponding to a 64.83% callus survival rate and a 78.10% shoot regeneration efficiency. Both the callus survival ratio and regeneration efficiency of rJrGRF4b vector was higher than control vector (59.05% of callus survival ratio and 67.25% of regeneration efficiency), especially in comparison to JrGRF4b vector. On the contrary, The Jr-miR396a vector was introduced into a total of 497 mature zygotic embryos, leading to callus formation in 234 instances. Of these, shoot regeneration was achieved in 136 callus, a callus survival rate of 47.08% and a regeneration efficiency of 58.12%. The callus survival rate and regeneration ratio were clearly lower than those of control vector. In conclusion, rJrGRF4b improved callus survival ratio and shoots regeneration ratio of the transformation efficiency of birch potentially.

Jr-miR396a and rJrGRF4b mediated cell development and influenced genetic transformation efficiency in birch

To further elucidate the effects of Jr-miR396a, JrGRF4b, and rJrGRF4b on callus induction and plant regeneration during the genetic transformation process in birch, histological observations were conducted on callus grown for 30th days on callus induction medium. Therefore, we examined the paraffin sections of callus from control, Jr-miR396a-OE-1, JrGRF4b-OE-7, and rJrGRF4b-OE-11 under the light microscope (Figure 4G). Under the 20x magnification, on one hand, it was observed that the cell areas of rJrGRF4b-OE-11 was significantly larger than that of control and JrGRF4b-OE-7 (**p<0.01), with no significant difference between control and JrGRF4b-OE-7 (Figure 4H). On the other hand, the cell areas of Jr-miR396a-OE-1 was significantly smaller than that of control (**p<0.01; Figure 4H). Besides, under the 5x magnification, it exhibited a markedly greater number of blastemates compared to both control and JrGRF4b-OE-7 (**p<0.01), while control and JrGRF4b-OE-7 showed comparable levels without significant difference (Figure 4I). As expected, the blastemates numbers was significantly less than control (**p<0.01, Figure 4I). In summary, rJrGRF4b-OE-11 significantly enhanced callus induction and plant regeneration by promoting the enlargement of callus cells and increasing the number of shoot primordia, whereas Jr-miR396a-OE-1 inhibited these processes.

To further investigate the mechanism by which Jr-miR396a suppressed genetic transformation efficiency in birch, we proposed the hypothesis that Jr-miR396a might target and negatively regulate BpGRFs in birch. First of all, we performed bioinformatic predictions for targeted negative regulatory sites of Jr-miR396a and BpGRFs. The prediction results indicated that all BpGRFs genes (BpGRF1-BpGRF9) were targeted and bound to Jr-miR396a, leading to the cleavage of mRNA transcripts and achieving post-transcriptional suppression (Supplementary Figure S9). To clarify the potential mechanisms, the relative expression level of BpGRFs genes in the callus of control, Jr-miR396a-OE-1, JrGRF4b-OE-7, and rJrGRF4b-OE-11 were analyzed. Except for BpGRF1, which was not detected in any of the callus, the relative expression levels of the other seven BpGRFs genes (BpGRF2-BpGRF8) in Jr-miR396a-OE-1 were significantly lower than those in control, JrGRF4b-OE-7, and rJrGRF4b-OE-11 (**p<0.01, Figure 4J). The result suggested that overexpression of Jr-miR396a down-regulated the expression of BpGRFs genes. Therefore, we concluded that Jr-miR396a suppressed genetic transformation efficiency in birch most likely by Inhibiting the expression of BpGRFs genes to further suppress callus cells growth and differentiation.

Discussion

The mechanisms of miR396 were highly conserved in different woody species

Through bioinformatic analyses and homology-based comparisons in the miRNA database, three genomic loci were identified in the walnut reference genome that produced identical mature miR396 sequences, Jr-miR396a. Similarly, three loci were detected in the birch reference genome, giving rise to two distinct mature sequences, Bp-miR396a and Bp-miR396b. However, the seed region sequences (nucleotides 2–8 of from 5′ to 3′, which were important to specific pairing with target mRNA) of the mature miR396 sequences were found to be completely identical between walnut and birch. Furthermore, analysis of the secondary structures of the miR396 precursors revealed that the complementary strand corresponding to the seed region (requirements for biosynthetic mechanisms) at the 3′ regions was also identical between the two species. These results demonstrated that both the mature sequence and precursor secondary structure of miR396 are highly conserved during species evolution in walnut and birch. The biogenesis of miRNAs initiated with the transcription of MIR genes in plants by DNA-dependent RNA polymerase II (Pol II), generated primary miRNA transcripts (pri-miRNAs) (Zhan and Meyers, 2023). These single-stranded, polyadenylated pri-miRNAs spontaneously fold into hairpin structures (Borges and Martienssen, 2015). The DCL1 (Dicer-like protein 1) nuclease subsequently cleaved the pri-miRNA to produce precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs) containing stem-loop structures (Xie et al., 2004). Further processing by DCL1 yields mature miRNA duplexes, comprising the guide strand (miRNA) and passenger strand (miRNA*) (Zhan and Meyers, 2023). Typically, the miRNA* strand was degraded, while the miRNA strand is incorporated into Argonaute (AGO) proteins to form the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). This complex mediates either targeted mRNA cleavage or translational repression, depending on the degree of complementarity between the miRNA and its target sequence (Chen and Kim, 2024). In this study, the Jr-MIR396a-1 from walnut was successfully integrated birch. Notably, high expression levels of mature Jr-miR396a were detected in transgenic plants, demonstrated that endogenous proteins involved in miRNA biogenesis-including BpPol II, BpDCL1, and BpAGOs properly processed the heterologous Jr-MIR396a-1 into its mature form (included correct hairpin structure formation of Jr-MIR396a-1, and accurate cleavage to generate mature Jr-miR396a sequences). Furthermore, overexpressing Jr-MIRR396a-1 of transgenic plants showed significantly reduced expression of endogenous BpGRFs, which confirmed that Jr-miR396a could assemble into functional RISC complexes with BpAGOs proteins to regulate target genes. In summary, it was demonstrated that the miRNA biosynthetic pathway and its regulatory mechanisms were evolutionarily conserved in both walnut and birch.

Post-transcriptional silencing of transgenes through miRNA-mediated epigenetic regulation requires careful consideration

There are two distinct modes of miRNA-mediated post-transcriptional repression were identified in plants: (1) translational inhibition through complementary binding to either 5′UTR or 3′UTR regions of target transcripts, and (2) transcript cleavage-induced degradation via perfect base pairing with mRNA targets (Rogers and Chen, 2013). Bioinformatics analysis revealed that JrGRF4b mRNA was targeted by Bp-miR396 for cleavage-mediated suppression in birch. To prevent potential inhibition of walnut-derived JrGRF4b by endogenous Bp-miR396, a synonymous mutation was introduced into the JrGRF4b cDNA sequence, resulting in rJrGRF4b (the amino acid sequence was same to JrGRF4b) with disrupted Jr-miR396a and Bp-miR396 binding sites. The predictions demonstrated significantly reduced binding affinity of both Bp-miR396a and Bp-miR396b to rJrGRF4b mRNA at two critical regions: the seed sequence (positions 2–8 bp from the 5′ end) and the supplementary binding domain (positions 13–16 bp from the 5′ end), which was previously reported to enhance target recognition (Bartel, 2018). Comparative analysis of transgenic birch lines showed that while overexpression of JrGRF4b did not significantly alter transformation efficiency or plant growth characteristics compared to controls, rJrGRF4b-overexpressing lines exhibited 2.53% increase in transformation efficiency and significantly improved growth performance at equivalent developmental stages, as evidenced by enhanced callus size, adventitious shoot height, and root length etc.

miRNAs were demonstrated to silence target genes through RISC-mediated mechanisms. AGO proteins, as the primary components of the RISC complex, were characterized by four conserved domains (N, PAZ, MID, and PIWI) (Lee et al., 2023). Among these, the MID domain preferentially selected miRNA guide strands that initiated with uridine (U) or adenine (A) at the 5′ end (Khvorova et al., 2003; Suzuki et al., 2015). Further, the PIWI domain of AGO proteins possessed an RNase H-like fold, and some AGO proteins were capable of cleaving the targeted mRNA between the 10th and 11th positions of the miRNA binding sites (Song et al., 2004). Additionally, during the translational inhibition process, AGO proteins in the RISC complex were found to prevent ribosome assembly or to stall the elongation phase of translation of targeted mRNAs (Bartel, 2018). Therefore, when the target gene was post-transcriptionally repressed by endogenous plant miRNAs, it was important to consider not only the miRNA-target relationships but also to introduce specific synonymous base substitutions based on the functional properties of AGO proteins within the plant. This approach could effectively prevent post-transcriptional silencing.

miRNA-mediated post-transcriptional regulation of target genes was demonstrated to be highly conserved in plants (Chen and Kim, 2024). Beyond the well-characterized miR396-GRF module regulating plant growth and development, several other evolutionarily conserved miRNA-target pairs were identified: miR156-SPL, which negatively regulated the timing of leaf primordium development and flowering in Zea mays (Chuck et al., 2010) and Arabidopsis (Wang et al., 2008); miR159-MYB33, involved in the negative regulation of anther, pistil and seed development in Arabidopsis (Allen et al., 2007); miR164-CUC, controlling meristem formation and leaf morphology in Oryza (Li et al., 2003); miR169-CCAAT box binding factors (CBFs), essential for modulating C gene transcription in Antirrhinum majus (Cartolano et al., 2007); and miR393-TIR1/AFB, which maintained auxin homeostasis through negative regulation in Arabidopsis (Parry et al., 2009). During heterologous genetic transformation, when post-transcriptional silencing occurs due to miRNA-mediated epigenetic regulation, the synonymous mutation-based strategy employed in this study, which disrupts miRNA target sites while maintaining the original amino acid sequence, could be implemented to achieve stable and high-level transgene expression in recipient plants.

miR396-resistant GRF enhances woody plant transformation

The results demonstrated that overexpression of JrGRF4b did not significantly alter genetic transformation efficiency in birch, callus size, adventitious height, or rooting percentage compared to controls. In contrast, overexpression of rJrGRF4b exhibited significant improvements in all these parameters, indicated its potential to enhance transformation efficiency and shorten the regeneration cycle in woody plants. Conversely, overexpression of Jr-miR396a in birch suppressed these traits. Further, the rJrGRF4b-overexpressing callus displayed markedly enlarged cells and a higher number of differentiated shoot primordia compared to JrGRF4b and control lines, whereas Jr-miR396a overexpressing callus showed pronounced growth inhibition in cytological observations. JrGRF4b was annotated with molecular function terms related to stimulus response with GO analysis, suggesting its potential role in regulating secondary metabolite biosynthesis during plant growth and development. Previous studies reported that overexpression of AtGRF2/AtGRF3 increased leaf size by upregulating cell cycle genes, accelerating proliferation and cell expansion in Arabidopsis (Kim et al., 2003). Zm-rGRF1 overexpression enhanced leaf length by increasing cell number, while ZmGRF10 restricted proliferation, reducing plant height and leaf size in maize (Wu et al., 2014; Nelissen et al., 2015). miR396-mediated suppression of MsGRFs activity inhibited root apical meristem growth and cell proliferation in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) (Bazin et al., 2013). Collectively, the study suggested that JrGRF4b, either through miRNA target site disruption or Bp-miR396 gene editing, represented a viable strategy to overcome intrinsic limitations in woody plant transformation systems by bypassing miRNA-mediated repression of growth-promoting genes.

Conclusion

In this study, the walnut-derived miR396-GRF module by introducing Jr-miR396a, JrGRF4b, and its miRNA-resistant variant rJrGRF4b into birch. It was found that JrGRF4b overexpression was post-transcriptionally suppressed by endogenous Bp-miR396, showing no improvement in transformation efficiency. In contrast, rJrGRF4b overexpression, which escaped miRNA-mediated repression, increased transformation efficiency by 2.53% and significantly enhanced callus growth, organogenesis, and cellular expansion (**p<0.01). Conversely, Jr-miR396a overexpression inhibited endogenous BpGRFs, suppressing both transformation efficiency and plant growth. These results demonstrated that endogenous miRNA-mediated regulation significantly impacts transgene performance, and that preemptive evaluation and engineering of miRNA target sites are essential for achieving stable, high-efficiency transgene expression in woody plants. The study provided a practical strategy to overcome species-specific silencing barriers in plant genetic engineering.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: http://xhhuanglab.cn/data/juglans.html, The Genomic Data of Juglans.

Author contributions

BL: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MP: Data curation, Investigation, Software, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. DW: Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. ZZ: Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. DP: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The work was financially supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (NO. 2023YFD2200303) and the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 32330069).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1629166/full#supplementary-material

References

Agarwal, V., Bell, G. W., Nam, J. W., and Bartel, D. P. (2015). Predicting effective microRNA target sites in mammalian mRNAs. Elife 4, 1–38. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Allen, R. S., Li, J., Stahle, M. I., Dubroué, A., Gubler, F., and Millar, A. A. (2007). Genetic analysis reveals functional redundancy and the major target genes of the Arabidopsis miR159 family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 16371–16376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707653104

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bartel, D. P. (2018). Metazoan microRNAs. Cell 173, 20–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Baucher, M., Moussawi, J., Vandeputte, O. M., Monteyne, D., Mol, A., Pérez-Morga, D., et al. (2013). A role for the miR396/GRF network in specification of organ type during flower development, as supported by ectopic expression of P opulus trichocarpa miR396c in transgenic tobacco. Plant Biol. 15, 892–898. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00696.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bazin, J., Khan, G. A., Combier, J. P., Bustos-Sanmamed, P., Debernardi, J. M., Rodriguez, R., et al. (2013). miR396 affects mycorrhization and root meristem activity in the legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 74, 920–934. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12178

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bechtold, N. and Bouchez, D. (1995). In planta Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of adult Arabidopsis thaliana plants by vacuum infiltration. Gene Transfer Plants. 3, 19–23. doi: 10.1385/0-89603-391-0:259

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Betti, F., Ladera-Carmona, M. J., Weits, D. A., Ferri, G., Iacopino, S., Novi, G., et al. (2021). Exogenous miRNAs induce post-transcriptional gene silencing in plants. Nat. Plants 7, 1379–1388. doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-01005-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Borges, F. and Martienssen, R. A. (2015). The expanding world of small RNAs in plants. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 727–741. doi: 10.1038/nrm4085

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, X., Xie, H., Song, M., Lu, J., Ma, P., Huang, B., et al. (2023). Cut–dip–budding delivery system enables genetic modifications in plants without tissue culture. Innovation 4, 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100345. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100345

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cartolano, M., Castillo, R., Efremova, N., Kuckenberg, M., Zethof, J., Gerats, T., et al. (2007). A conserved microRNA module exerts homeotic control over Petunia hybrida and Antirrhinum majus floral organ identity. Nat. Genet. 39, 901–905. doi: 10.1038/ng2056

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chaudhry, S. and Sidhu, G. P. S. (2022). Climate change regulated abiotic stress mechanisms in plants: a comprehensive review. Plant Cell Rep. 41, 1–31. doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02759-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, L. L. and Kim, V. N. (2024). Small and long non-coding RNAs: Past, present, and future. Cell 187, 6451–6485. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.024

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Ma, S., Ku, H., Huangfu, B., Wang, K., Du, C., et al. (2024). Contiguous identity between entire coding regions of transgenic and native genes rather than special regions is essential for a strong co-suppression. Plant Sci. 341, 112016. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2024.112016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, F., Yang, Y., Luo, X., Zhou, W., Dai, Y., Zheng, C., et al. (2019). Genome-wide identification of GRF transcription factors in soybean and expression analysis of GmGRF family under shade stress. BMC Plant Biol. 19, 269. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1861-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, X., Li, H., Tang, Q., Zhang, H., Liu, T., and Wang, Y. (2024b). Trends in the global commercialization of genetically modified crops in 2023. J. Integr. Agric. 23, 3943–3952. doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2024.09.012

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, D., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Cao, L., Wu, S., Yu, S., et al. (2024a). Establishment of high-efficiency genome editing in white birch (Betula platyphylla Suk.). Plant Biotechnol. J. 22, 7–9. doi: 10.1111/pbi.14176

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chuck, G., Whipple, C., Jackson, D., and Hake, S. (2010). The maize SBP-box transcription factor encoded by tasselsheath4 regulates bract development and the establishment of meristem boundaries. Development 137, 1243–1250. doi: 10.1242/dev.048348

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Debernardi, J. M., Tricoli, D. M., Ercoli, M. F., Hayta, S., Ronald, P., Palatnik, J. F., et al. (2020). A GRF-GIF chimeric protein improves the regeneration efficiency of transgenic plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1274–1279. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0703-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng, Q., Xiao, L., He, Y., Liu, M., Wang, J., Tian, S., et al. (2021). Highly efficient, genotype-independent transformation and gene editing in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) using a chimeric ClGRF4-GIF1 gene. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63, 2038–2042. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13199

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fraley, R. T., Rogers, S. G., Horsch, R. B., Sanders, P. R., Flick, J. S., Adams, S. P., et al. (1983). Expression of bacterial genes in plant cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 80, 4803–4807. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.15.4803

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, F., Wang, K., Liu, Y., Chen, Y., Chen, P., Shi, Z., et al. (2015). Blocking miR396 increases rice yield by shaping inflorescence architecture. Nat. Plants 2, 15196. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.196

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gu, W., Xu, Y., Xie, X., Wang, T., Ko, J.-H., and Zhou, T. (2014). The role of RNA structure at 5′ untranslated region in microRNA-mediated gene regulation. Rna 20, 1369–1375. doi: 10.1261/rna.044792.114

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, K.-H., Meilan, R., Ma, C., and Strauss, S. (2000). An Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation protocol effective on a variety of cottonwood hybrids (genus Populus). Plant Cell Rep. 19, 315–320. doi: 10.1007/s002990050019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Herrera-Estrella, L., De Block, M., Messens, E., Hernalsteens, J. P., Van Montagu, M., and Schell, J. (1983). Chimeric genes as dominant selectable markers in plant cells. EMBO J. 2, 987–995. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01532.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Heyman, J., Cools, T., Canher, B., Shavialenka, S., Traas, J., Vercauteren, I., et al. (2016). The heterodimeric transcription factor complex ERF115–PAT1 grants regeneration competence. Nat. Plants 2, 1–7. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.165

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hiei, Y., Ohta, S., Komari, T., and Kumashiro, T. (1994). Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J. 6, 271–282. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1994.6020271.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hinchee, M. A., Connor-Ward, D. V., Newell, C. A., McDonnell, R. E., Sato, S. J., Gasser, C. S., et al. (1988). Production of transgenic soybean plants using Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer. Bio/technology 6, 915–922. doi: 10.1038/nbt0888-915

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ji, F., Ma, Q., Zhang, W., Liu, J., Feng, Y., Zhao, P., et al. (2021). A genome variation map provides insights into the genetics of walnut adaptation and agronomic traits. Genome Biol. 22, 300. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02517-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kan, R. L., Chen, J., and Sallam, T. (2022). Crosstalk between epitranscriptomic and epigenetic mechanisms in gene regulation. Trends Genet. 38, 182–193. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2021.06.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Karlova, R., van Haarst, J. C., Maliepaard, C., van de Geest, H., Bovy, A. G., Lammers, M., et al. (2013). Identification of microRNA targets in tomato fruit development using high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 1863–1878. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert049

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Khvorova, A., Reynolds, A., and Jayasena, S. D. (2003). Functional siRNAs and miRNAs exhibit strand bias. Cell 115, 209–216. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00801-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, J. H. (2019). Biological roles and an evolutionary sketch of the GRF-GIF transcriptional complex in plants. BMB. Rep. 52, 227–238. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2019.52.4.051

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, J. H., Choi, D., and Kende, H. (2003). The AtGRF family of putative transcription factors is involved in leaf and cotyledon growth in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 36, 94–104. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01862.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, R. C., Feinbaum, R. L., and Ambros, V. (1993). The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell 75, 843–854. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90529-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, Y.-Y., Lee, H., Kim, H., Kim, V. N., and Roh, S.-H. (2023). Structure of the human DICER–pre-miRNA complex in a dicing state. Nature 615, 331–338. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05723-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, B., Jiang, X., Chai, Z., Liu, J., Gao, C., and Chen, K. (2025). Disruption of the miR396 binding site in GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR 4 enhances grain size in wheat. Sci. China Life Sci., 1–3. doi: 10.1007/s11427-024-2878-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Pan, W., Zhang, S., Ma, G., Li, A., Zhang, H., et al. (2024). A rapid and highly efficient sorghum transformation strategy using GRF4-GIF1/ternary vector system. Plant J. 117, 1604–1613. doi: 10.1111/tpj.16575

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X., Qian, Q., Fu, Z., Wang, Y., Xiong, G., Zeng, D., et al. (2003). Control of tillering in rice. Nature 422, 618–621. doi: 10.1038/nature01518

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S., Tian, Y., Wu, K., Ye, Y., Yu, J., Zhang, J., et al. (2018). Modulating plant growth-metabolism coordination for sustainable agriculture. Nature 560, 595–600. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0415-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Guo, P., Wang, J., and Xu, Z. Y. (2023). Growth-regulating factors: conserved and divergent roles in plant growth and development and potential value for crop improvement. Plant J. 113, 1122–1145. doi: 10.1111/tpj.16090

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, H., Guo, S., Xu, Y., Li, C., Zhang, Z., Zhang, D., et al. (2014). OsmiR396d-regulated OsGRFs function in floral organogenesis in rice through binding to their targets OsJMJ706 and OsCR4. Plant Physiol. 165, 160–174. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.235564

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lloyd, A. M., Barnason, A. R., Rogers, S. G., Byrne, M. C., Fraley, R. T., and Horsch, R. B. (1986). Transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Science 234, 464–466. doi: 10.1126/science.234.4775.464

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, Y., Meng, Y., Zeng, J., Luo, Y., Feng, Z., Bian, L., et al. (2020). Coordination between GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR1 and GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR1 plays a key role in regulating leaf growth in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 20, 200. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02417-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Meyers, B. C., Axtell, M. J., Bartel, B., Bartel, D. P., Baulcombe, D., Bowman, J. L., et al. (2008). Criteria for annotation of plant MicroRNAs. Plant Cell 20, 3186–3190. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.064311

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nelissen, H., Eeckhout, D., Demuynck, K., Persiau, G., Walton, A., van Bel, M., et al. (2015). Dynamic changes in ANGUSTIFOLIA3 complex composition reveal a growth regulatory mechanism in the maize leaf. Plant Cell 27, 1605–1619. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00269

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Noack, F., Engist, D., Gantois, J., Gaur, V., Hyjazie, B. F., Larsen, A., et al. (2024). Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops. Science 385, eado9340. doi: 10.1126/science.ado9340

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Parry, G., Calderon-Villalobos, L. I., Prigge, M., Peret, B., Dharmasiri, S., Itoh, H., et al. (2009). Complex regulation of the TIR1/AFB family of auxin receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 22540–22545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911967106

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rao, X., Huang, X., Zhou, Z., and Lin, X. (2013). An improvement of the 2ˆ (–delta delta CT) method for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data analysis. Biostatistics. Bioinf. biomathematics. 3, 71. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5489(99)92176-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodriguez, R. E., Mecchia, M. A., Debernardi, J. M., Schommer, C., Weigel, D., and Palatnik, J. F. (2010). Control of cell proliferation in Arabidopsis thaliana by microRNA miR396. Development 137, 103–112. doi: 10.1242/dev.043067

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rogers, K. and Chen, X. (2013). Biogenesis, turnover, and mode of action of plant microRNAs. Plant Cell 25, 2383–2399. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.113159

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sato, H., Mizoi, J., Shinozaki, K., and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2024). Complex plant responses to drought and heat stress under climate change. Plant J. 117, 1873–1892. doi: 10.1111/tpj.16612

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, J.-J., Smith, S. K., Hannon, G. J., and Joshua-Tor, L. (2004). Crystal structure of Argonaute and its implications for RISC slicer activity. science 305, 1434–1437. doi: 10.1126/science.1102514

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Streatfield, S. J. (2007). Approaches to achieve high-level heterologous protein production in plants. Plant. 5, 2–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00216.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sugimura, Y., Kadotani, N., Ueda, Y., Shima, K., Kitajima, S., Furusawa, T., et al. (2005). Transgenic patchouli plants produced by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Plant cell. Tissue Organ culture. 82, 251–257. doi: 10.1007/s11240-005-1039-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Suzuki, H. I., Katsura, A., Yasuda, T., Ueno, T., Mano, H., Sugimoto, K., et al. (2015). Small-RNA asymmetry is directly driven by mammalian Argonautes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 512–521. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3050

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Valjakka, M., Aronen, T., Kangasjärvi, J., Vapaavuori, E., and Häggman, H. (2000). Genetic transformation of silver birch (Betula pendula) by particle bombardment. Tree Physiol. 20, 607–613. doi: 10.1093/treephys/20.9.607

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Vasil, V., Castillo, A. M., Fromm, M. E., and Vasil, I. K. (1992). Herbicide resistant fertile transgenic wheat plants obtained by microprojectile bombardment of regenerable embryogenic callus. Bio/technology 10, 667–674. doi: 10.1038/nbt0692-667

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, J. W., Schwab, R., Czech, B., Mica, E., and Weigel, D. (2008). Dual effects of miR156-targeted SPL genes and CYP78A5/KLUH on plastochron length and organ size in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 20, 1231–1243. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.058180

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, P., Si, H., Li, C., Xu, Z., Guo, H., Jin, S., et al. (2025). Plant genetic transformation: achievements, current status and future prospects. Plant Biotechnol. J. 23, 2034–2058. doi: 10.1111/pbi.70028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, W., Wang, W., Pan, Y., Tan, C., Li, H., Chen, Y., et al. (2022). A new gain-of-function OsGS2/GRF4 allele generated by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing increases rice grain size and yield. Crop J. 10, 1207–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2022.01.004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, M. F., Tian, Q., and Reed, J. W. (2006). Arabidopsis microRNA167 controls patterns of ARF6 and ARF8 expression, and regulates both female and male reproduction. Development 133, 4211–4218. doi: 10.1242/dev.02602

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, J., Wang, J., Hui, W., Zhao, F., Wang, P., Su, C., et al. (2022). Physiology of plant responses to water stress and related genes: A review. Forests 13, 324. doi: 10.3390/f13020324

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, L., Zhang, D., Xue, M., Qian, J., He, Y., and Wang, S. (2014). Overexpression of the maize GRF10, an endogenous truncated growth-regulating factor protein, leads to reduction in leaf size and plant height. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 56, 1053–1063. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12220

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, Z., Johansen, L. K., Gustafson, A. M., Kasschau, K. D., Lellis, A. D., Zilberman, D., et al. (2004). Genetic and functional diversification of small RNA pathways in plants. PloS Biol. 2, E104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020104

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhan, J. and Meyers, B. C. (2023). Plant small RNAs: their biogenesis, regulatory roles, and functions. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 74, 21–51. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-070122-035226

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Li, Z., Jin, J., Xie, X., Zhang, H., Chen, Q., et al. (2018). Genome-wide identification and analysis of the growth-regulating factor family in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Gene 639, 117–127. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2017.09.070

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Yang, H., Rech, E., Golds, T., Davis, A., Mulligan, B., et al. (1988). Transgenic rice plants produced by electroporation-mediated plasmid uptake into protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep. 7, 379–384. doi: 10.1007/BF00269517

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H. and Zhu, J.-K. (2025). Epigenetic gene regulation in plants and its potential applications in crop improvement. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 26, 51–67. doi: 10.1038/s41580-024-00769-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, Y., Lin, S., Qiu, Z., Cao, D., Wen, J., Deng, X., et al. (2015). MicroRNA857 is involved in the regulation of secondary growth of vascular tissues in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 169, 2539–2552. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: walnut, birch, MiR396, growth-regulating factors, post-transcriptional regulatory, transgene

Citation: Li B, Pan M, Wu D, Zheng Z and Pei D (2025) Escaping endogenous miRNA post-transcriptional silencing of JrGRF4b enhanced transformation efficiency in woody plants. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1629166. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1629166

Received: 15 May 2025; Accepted: 26 May 2025;
Published: 18 June 2025.

Edited by:

Bowei Chen, Jishou University, China

Reviewed by:

Zhaodong Hao, Nanjing Forestry University, China
Ying Zhao, Northeast Agricultural University, China

Copyright © 2025 Li, Pan, Wu, Zheng and Pei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Dong Pei, cGVpLmRvbmdAY2FmLmFjLmNu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.