There were mistakes regarding the phylotype of strain Po35, Po40, and PoYN. Those strains belong to Phylotype II, not Phylotype III.
In the Results section, sub-section Specificity, paragraph one, samples 35–38 and 41 were allocated to Phylotype II and samples 39–40 and 42 to Phylotype III. The correct paragraph should be:
The specificity of the LAMP for detecting R. solanacearum phylotype I mulberry strains was analyzed using genomic DNA isolated from 46 representative R. solanacearum strains that belonged to Phylotypes I (sample 1–34; 43–46), II (sample 35–42), and 7 other pathogens.
In addition, in the fourth paragraph of the Discussion, it was suggested that Phylotype III was also covered when it was not. The correct paragraph should be:
To evaluate the specificity of the LAMP-based method, 53 strains were used in this study, including 46 R. solanacearum strains covering Phylotypes I, II and seven other soil- borne bacteria strains.
Finally, in Table 1, the Phylotype of No. 39 (III), 40 (III), and 42 (III) are incorrect. The corrected table appears below.
Table 1
| No. | Strains | Host | Origin | Phylotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. solanacearum | ||||
| 1 | M2 | Mulberry | Guangdong | I |
| 2 | M3 | Mulberry | Shipan, Guangdong | I |
| 3 | M4 | Mulberry | Shipan, Guangdong | I |
| 4 | M7 | Mulberry | Shipan, Guangdong | I |
| 5 | M9 | Mulberry | Shipan, Guangdong | I |
| 6 | M10 | Mulberry | Zhejiang | I |
| 7 | M11 | Mulberry | Zhejiang | I |
| 8 | M12 | Mulberry | Tonglu, Zhejiang | I |
| 9 | M13 | Mulberry | Tonglu, Zhejiang | I |
| 10 | M14 | Mulberry | Tonglu, Zhejiang | I |
| 11 | M15 | Mulberry | Tonglu, Zhejiang | I |
| 12 | M16 | Mulberry | Tonglu, Zhejiang | I |
| 13 | M17 | Mulberry | Tonglu, Zhejiang | I |
| 14 | M18 | Mulberry | Tonglu, Zhejiang | I |
| 15 | M19 | Mulberry | Tonglu, Zhejiang | I |
| 16 | M20 | Mulberry | Linan, Zhejiang | I |
| 17 | M21 | Mulberry | Linan, Zhejiang | I |
| 18 | M22 | Mulberry | Linan, Zhejiang | I |
| 19 | M23 | Mulberry | Linan, Zhejiang | I |
| 20 | M24 | Mulberry | Linan, Zhejiang | I |
| 21 | M25 | Mulberry | Linan, Zhejiang | I |
| 22 | M26 | Mulberry | Linan, Zhejiang | I |
| 23 | M27 | Mulberry | Linan, Zhejiang | I |
| 24 | M5 | Mulberry | Shunde, Guangdong | I |
| 25 | M6 | Mulberry | Shipai, Guangdong | I |
| 26 | Sn1 | Night shade | Jinjiang, Fujian | I |
| 27 | Tb-Bs-1 | Tobacco | Baise, Guangxi | I |
| 28 | GMI1000 | Tomato | France | I |
| 29 | Bd1 | Hibiscus | Putian, Fujian | I |
| 30 | Bp-Gk-1 | Balsam pear | Guangxi | I |
| 31 | Ey-Aq-1 | Eucalyptus | Guilin, Guangxi | I |
| 32 | Tm2 | Tomato | Sanmenjiang, Guangxi | I |
| 33 | E1 | Eggplant | Jinjiang, Fujian | I |
| 34 | Ssp1 | Sesame | Liangfeng, Guangxi | I |
| 35 | R419 | Banana | – | II |
| 36 | R264 | Banana | – | II |
| 37 | R454 | Banana | – | II |
| 38 | Po82 | Potato | Mexico | II |
| 39 | Po35 | Potato | – | II |
| 40 | Po40 | Potato | Guangzhou, Guangdong | II |
| 41 | Po41 | Potato | Peng county, Sichuan | II |
| 42 | PoYN | Potato | Yunnan | II |
| 43 | Z-Aq-1 | Ginger | Anqiu, Shandong | I |
| 44 | Z-Rc-1 | Ginger | Chongqing | I |
| 45 | Kp-1 | Kaempferia panduratum | Guangxi | I |
| 46 | Z-Sch-1 | Ginger | Sichuan | I |
| Controls | ||||
| 47 | Enterobacter mori Rs18-2 | Mulberry | China | |
| 48 | Erwiniacarotovora E12-1 | Potato | China | |
| 49 | Ralstonia mannitolilytica | Soil | – | |
| 50 | Ralstonia pickettii | Soil | – | |
| 51 | Enterobacter sp | Soil | – | |
| 52 | Acidovorax citrulli | Watermelon | – | |
| 53 | Burkholderia cepacia | Onion | – | |
Ralstonia solanacearum and the control strains used in this study.
“–” means unknown.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that they do not affect the conclusion of the article in any way.
Statements
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Summary
Keywords
Ralstonia solanacearum, phylotype I mulberry strains, loop-mediated isothermal amplification, detection, bacterial wilt
Citation
Huang W, Zhang H, Xu J, Wang S, Kong X, Ding W, Xu J and Feng J (2017) Corrigendum: Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method for the Rapid Detection of Ralstonia solanacearum Phylotype I Mulberry Strains in China. Front. Plant Sci. 8:325. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00325
Received
19 February 2017
Accepted
23 February 2017
Published
09 March 2017
Volume
8 - 2017
Edited and reviewed by
Brigitte Mauch-Mani, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Updates
Copyright
© 2017 Huang, Zhang, Xu, Wang, Kong, Ding, Xu and Feng.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jin Xu jinxu@ippcaas.cn
This article was submitted to Plant Microbe Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.