ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 11 April 2017

Sec. Plant Proteomics and Protein Structural Biology

Volume 8 - 2017 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00534

Membrane Proteomics of Arabidopsis Glucosinolate Mutants cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29

  • 1. Department of Biology, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA

  • 2. Genetics Institute, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA

  • 3. Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Zagazig University Zagazig, Egypt

  • 4. Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA

  • 5. Thermo Fisher Scientific West Palm Beach, FL, USA

  • 6. Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA

Article metrics

View details

6

Citations

6k

Views

2,3k

Downloads

Abstract

Glucosinolates (Gls) constitute a major group of natural metabolites represented by three major classes (aliphatic, indolic and aromatic) of more than 120 chemical structures. In our previous work, soluble proteins and metabolites in Arabidopsis mutants deficient of aliphatic (myb28/29) and indolic Gls (cyp79B2B3) were analyzed. Here we focus on investigating the changes at the level of membrane proteins in these mutants. Our LC/MS-MS analyses of tandem mass tag (TMT) labeled peptides derived from the cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29 relative to wild type resulted in the identification of 4,673 proteins, from which 2,171 are membrane proteins. Fold changes and statistical analysis showed 64 increased and 74 decreased in cyp79B2/B3, while 28 increased and 17 decreased in myb28/29. As to the shared protein changes between the mutants, one protein was increased and eight were decreased. Bioinformatics analysis of the changed proteins led to the discovery of three cytochromes in glucosinolate molecular network (GMN): cytochrome P450 86A7 (At1g63710), cytochrome P450 71B26 (At3g26290), and probable cytochrome c (At1g22840). CYP86A7 and CYP71B26 may play a role in hydroxyl-indolic Gls production. In addition, flavone 3′-O-methyltransferase 1 represents an interesting finding as it is likely to participate in the methylation process of the hydroxyl-indolic Gls to form methoxy-indolic Gls. The analysis also revealed additional new nodes in the GMN related to stress and defense activity, transport, photosynthesis, and translation processes. Gene expression and protein levels were found to be correlated in the cyp79B2/B3, but not in the myb28/29.

Introduction

Glucosinolates (Gls) as natural anticancer compounds are represented by three major classes of chemical structures (aliphatic, indolic, and aromatic; Yan and Chen, 2007; Sønderby et al., 2010). In addition to their anti-carcinogenic activities, they have a distinct role in plant defense against herbivores (Halkier and Gershenzon, 2006; Yan and Chen, 2007) and pathogens (Kissen et al., 2009). The activities are attributed to their hydrolysis products, such as isothiocyanates, thiocyanates, and nitriles (Halkier and Gershenzon, 2006). Gls biosynthesis starts from methionine, tryptophan or phenylalanine to produce aliphatic, indolic, or aromatic Gls, respectively (Yan and Chen, 2007; Sønderby et al., 2010). Briefly, the substrate amino acid is converted to aldoxime, then to aci-nitro compounds, thiohydroximate, and desulfoglucosinolate. After sulfation, the core Gls structure is formed. In aliphatic Gls biosynthesis, the methionine chain-elongation and the core structure biosynthesis are under the control of three transcriptional factors MYB28, MYB29, and MYB76 (Yan and Chen, 2007; Frerigmann et al., 2012). In the core pathway, the formation of aldoximes is catalyzed by cytochrome P450s CYP79F1 and CYP79F2, and that of the aci-nitro compounds by CYP83A1 (Grubb and Abel, 2006). Then glutathione S-transferase U20 forms thiohydroximates, which are in turn rearranged to desulfoglucosinolate by UGT74B1 (Sønderby et al., 2010), followed by sulfation by SOT17 and SOT18 to produce intact Gls (Sønderby et al., 2010; Mostafa et al., 2016). Similar for indolic Gls, CYP79B2, CYP79B3, and CYP83B1 are responsible for aldoximes and aci-nitro compounds formation, followed by conversion to thiohydroximates by glutathione S-transferase F10, rearrangement to desulfoglucosinolates and sulfation to indolic Gls by SOT16 (Grubb and Abel, 2006; Mostafa et al., 2016). It is clear that the cytochrome P450s play a central role in the Gls biosynthesis, and these proteins are membrane localized (Neve and Ingelman-Sundberg, 2010).

Several studies have reported the relationship between the Gls biosynthetic pathway and other biological pathways in plants, e.g., amino acid and carbohydrate pathways using CYP79F1 RNAi lines (Chen et al., 2012), auxin biosynthesis using cyp79B2/B3 mutant (Zhao et al., 2002) and stress response pathways through environmental perturbation (Martínez-Ballesta et al., 2013). In our previous work, we used Arabidopsis double mutants (cyp79B2/B3 deficient in indolic Gls production and myb28/29 deficient in aliphatic Gls production), and discovered new nodes in the glucosinolate molecular network (GMN) that include stress and defense related proteins like glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase, glutathione S-transferase F7 and glutathione S-transferase F2 and the electron carriers cytochrome B5 isoform C and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5b-2 (Mostafa et al., 2016). To date, no studies have reported the glucosinolate molecular networks in the membrane proteome context.

Since many known glucosinolate proteins such as the cytochrome P450s are membrane or membrane associated proteins, here we investigated how perturbation of Gls metabolism using the aforementioned mutants affects the Arabidopsis membrane proteome using Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) labeling LC-MS/MS based quantitative proteomics. Analyses of protein interaction networks using STRING and functional enrichment of the identified proteins using agriGO allowed us to discover new nodes and edges in the GMN. With qRT-PCR, we were able to determine the correlation between gene transcripts and membrane proteins in the two mutants. Together with our published soluble proteomics work (Mostafa et al., 2016), this study enables a comprehensive understanding of the Arabidopsis GMNs.

Materials and methods

Plant genotyping, growth, and sample collection

Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh ecotype Columbia (Col-0) seeds were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (Columbus, OH, USA). The seeds of cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29 were kindly provided by Dr. John Celenza (Boston University, Boston, MA, USA) and Dr. Masami Hirai (RIKEN Plant Science Center, Yokohama, Japan), respectively. The mutant genotyping and chemotyping were reported in our previous study (Mostafa et al., 2016). Seed germination and seedling growth were conducted as previously described (Mostafa et al., 2016). Leaves from 5-week old wild type (WT), cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29 were collected, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Four replicates were included per genotype, and each replicate contains 2 g leaves pooled from 12 plants.

Protein extraction and peptide TMT labeling

Protein was extracted according to Pang et al. (2010) by grinding the leaf tissues in liquid nitrogen and then homogenizing on ice in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothritol (DTT), 0.5 M sucrose, and 10 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). The protein extracts were filtered through cheesecloth and centrifuged at 800 g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to ultracentrifuge tubes and centrifuged again at 100,000 g for 1.5 h at 4°C. The formed microsomal membrane was washed with 100 mM sodium carbonate using a glass dounce homogenizer, followed by centrifugation at 100,000 g for 1.5 h at 4°C. The microsome pellets were rinsed with 500 μl resuspension buffer containing 100 mM HEPES (pH 7), 1% triton X-100 and 0.5 M sucrose, and centrifuged at 800 g for 10 min at 4°C. Protein was precipitated using 5 volumes ice cold 90% acetone overnight at −20°C, followed by washing the pellets once with ice cold 90% acetone and twice with ice cold acetone before solubilizing in 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, and 0.25% Triton X-100. The protein amount was assayed using an EZQ assay kit (Invitrogen Inc., Eugene, OR, USA).

A total of 50 μg protein from each replicate was precipitated with ice cold 90% acetone at −20°C overnight, followed by 20,000 g centrifugation at 4°C for 15 min. After washing with ice cold 90% acetone, the pellets were solubilized, reduced, alkylated and digested with modified trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) at a 1:25 (w/w) ratio for 16 h at 37°C, followed by TMT labeling according to the TMT 6-plex kit manual (Thermo Scientific Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The WT replicates were labeled with 126 and 127 tags, cyp79B2/B3 replicates with 128 and 129 tags and myb28/29 replicates with 130 and 131 tags at room temperature for 2 h. After quenching with 8 μl 5% hydroxylamine for 30 min, the labeled samples were combined and lyophilized. Two independent experiments and four biological replicates each sample were performed.

Peptide desalting, strong cation exchange fractionation, and LC-MS/MS analysis

The TMT labeled peptides were desalted on Macrospin C-18 reverse phase mini-column (The Nestgroup Inc., Southborough, MA, USA) and fractionated using an Agilent HPLC 1260 strong cation exchange system as previously described (Mostafa et al., 2016). A total of 12 fractions were collected from each experiment. Each fraction was lyophilized, solubilized in solvent A (0.1% formic acid and 3% acetonitrile), and analyzed using an Easy-nLC 1000 system coupled to a Q-Exactive Orbitrap Plus MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) according to Mostafa et al. (2016) with minor modifications: The mobile phase gradient was ramped from 2 to 30% of solvent B (0.1% formic acid and 99.9% acetonitrile) in 57 min, then to 98% of solvent B in 6 min and maintained for 12 min. Mass analysis was performed in positive ion mode with high collision dissociation energy. The scan range was 400–2,000 m/z with full MS resolution of 70,000 and 200–2,000 m/z with MS2 resolution of 17,500. The first mass was fixed at 115 m/z, and 445.12003 m/z (polysiloxane ion mass) was used for real-time mass calibration.

Protein identification and quantification

The MS data were searched using Proteome Discoverer 1.4 (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) against the Arabidopsis TAIR10 database with 35,386 entries. The searching parameters were set to 300 and 5,000 Da as minimum and maximum precursor mass filters, digestion with trypsin with two missed cleavages, Carbamidomethylation of cysteine was set as a static modification, and TMT6plex of N terminus, TMT6plex of lysine, phosphorylation of STY (serine, threonine, and tyrosine) and methionine oxidation were set as dynamic modifications. Precursor mass tolerance was 10 ppm, fragment mass tolerance was 0.01 Da, spectrum grouping maximum retention time difference was 1.1 and false discovery rate was 0.01 at the peptide level. Proteins quantification based on labeled unique peptides intensities and statistical analyses were performed as previously described (Chen et al., 2012; Mostafa et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2017). The proteomics data were deposited to ProteomeXchange repository (accession number: PXD005781).

String bioinformatics analysis and gene ontology enrichment

The relationship between the significantly changed proteins and Gls metabolic pathways (Chen et al., 2011; Mostafa et al., 2016) was analyzed using STRING bioinformatics tool (Baldrianová et al., 2015; Ji et al., 2016; Lim et al., 2017). The resulted networks were visualized in the confidence view relying on gene neighborhood, fusion, co-occurrence, co-expression, literature, and available data. To determine the enriched pathways, we performed Singular Enrichment Analysis (SEA) for the changed proteins and the results were compared using a cross comparison of SEA (SEACOMPARE) in the agriGO database (Silva-Sanchez et al., 2013).

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

To determine whether protein expression levels were correlated with transcript levels, we conducted qRT-PCR of 44 genes selected based on the proteomics data (32 for cyp79B2/B3 and 22 for myb28/28). This list of primers used in qRT-PCR is provided in Supplementary Table 1. Total RNA was extracted using a RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and cDNA was synthesized with ProtoScript® II Reverse Transcriptase (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). qRT-PCR was performed with VeriQuest SyBr and a fluorescein kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using CFX96 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) as described previously (Koh et al., 2012). For each reaction, three technical and three biological replicates were included. Relative expression of the target genes was calculated using the comparative Ct method (Applied Biosystems, Framingham, USA). The differences in Ct values (ΔCt) between the target gene and two internal controls (AT4G34270 and AT5G44200) were calculated to normalize differences in the starting materials. The expression ratios of cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29 to WT were calculated and compared to the ratios from the protein data using Pearson's r.

Results

cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29 membrane proteomes

Based on the MS/MS spectra of high confidence peptides derived from the WT, cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29, we identified 4673 proteins in two independent experiments using Proteome Discover (Supplementary Table 2). Out of these proteins, 3,132 were identified in both experiments, while 1,076 and 465 were unique to experiments 1 and 2, respectively (Figure 1A). A total of 4,655 proteins were available for quantification based on unique TMT labeled peptides, highlighting the high efficiency of labeling. PD enrichment analysis (based on TAIR and Uniprot annotations) of the identified proteins showed 2,171 to be membrane proteins (Figure 1B and Supplementary Table 2). Comparative analysis of the protein expression changes between the mutants and WT at a fold change cutoff (>1.2 and <0.8), a p < 0.05 and transmembrane domain analysis revealed 93 proteins to be increased (Figure 1C) and 99 to be decreased (Figure 1D). Transmembrane domain analysis revealed that 175 out of the 192 differentially expressed proteins contained at least one transmembrane domains. The rest deemed to be membrane associated proteins (Supplementary Table 3). Correlating the changed proteins to those involved in Gls metabolism using STRING showed new nodes and edges (Figures 2, 3). The new nodes can be categorized according to their positions in the network as directly correlated or indirectly correlated to Gls metabolism. They can also be classified according to their biological roles as secondary (stress related) and tertiary (other biological process) connections (Detailed in next sections).

Figure 1

Figure 1

Venn diagrams showing numbers of identified proteins, membrane proteins, changed proteins, and their distributions. (A) Number of identified proteins in two independent TMT experiments at high peptide confidence. (B) Number of identified membrane proteins. (C) Number of significantly increased membrane proteins in cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29 relative to WT at p < 0.05 and fold change >1.2. (D) Number of significantly decreased membrane proteins in cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29 relative to WT at p < 0.05 and fold change < 0.8.

Figure 2

Figure 2

STRING analysis of cyp79B2/B3 changed proteins in relation to known proteins in Gls biosynthesis. Known Gls biosynthetic proteins are indicated by red balls, new proteins in the GMN are indicated by gray balls, proteins changed in both mutants are indicated by italic labeling, and uniquely changed proteins in cyp79B2/B3 are indicated by non-italic labeling. Proteins involved in Gls biosynthesis, stress and defense, and other processes are labeled with green, brown, and violet labels, respectively. Connections strength are proportional to edges thickness as derived from neighborhood, gene fusion, co-occurrence, co-expression, previous experiments, and text-mining information at medium confidence score. Asterisk (*) indicates manual connections based on literature. Double asterisk (**) indicates known nodes in both mutants (Mostafa et al., 2016), and triple asterisk (***) indicates known nodes in cyp79B2/B3 (Mostafa et al., 2016). Full names of the mapped proteins can be found in the abbreviation and protein name columns in Tables 1, 2.

Figure 3

Figure 3

STRING analysis of myb28/29 changed proteins in relation to known proteins in Gls biosynthesis. Known Gls biosynthetic proteins are indicated by red balls, new proteins in GMN are indicated by gray balls, proteins changed in both mutants are indicated by italic labeling, and uniquely changed proteins in myb28/29 are indicated by non-italic labeling. Proteins involved in Gls biosynthesis, stress and defense, and other processes are labeled with green, brown, and violet labels, respectively. Connections strength are proportional to edges thickness as derived from neighborhood, gene fusion, co-occurrence, co-expression, previous experiments, and text-mining information at medium confidence score. Asterisk (*) indicates manual connections based on literature. Double asterisk (**) indicates known nodes in both mutants (Mostafa et al., 2016). Full names of the mapped proteins can be found in the abbreviation and protein name columns in Tables 1, 2.

Common changes of membrane proteins between the cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29

Nine membrane proteins showed common changes between the two mutants relative to WT, with only one protein increased while the other eight decreased (Table 1). By STRING mapping of the significantly changed proteins (Figures 2, 3), we found seven of the nine proteins represented new connections with the glucosinolate metabolic network (GMN). The role of probable cytochrome c (CYC2) and plastocyanin minor isoform (PETE) in electron transport process (Pesaresi et al., 2009; Welchen et al., 2012) makes them biologically relevant tertiary connections in GMN in a way similar to cytochrome B5 isoform C and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5b-2 (Mostafa et al., 2016). Photosystem I reaction center subunit IV B (PSAE2), 14-3-3-like protein GF14 nu (GRF7), adenine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (APT1), alba DNA/RNA-binding protein (F28N24.7) and triose phosphate/phosphate translocator (APE2) form other tertiary nodes. Out of this group, APT1 was the only protein directly connected to the GMN (Figures 2, 3).

Table 1

Accession numberLocusProtein nameAbbreviation*FC cypap-value cypbFC mybap-value mybbFunctionTMDs toolReferences
Q9S714At2g20260Photosystem I reaction center subunit IV BPSAE21.6400.0161.3590.044PhotosynthesisD, H, TTair
F4I6B4At1g30470SIT4 phosphatase-associated family proteinAT1G304700.7820.0300.7810.049Phosphatase reactionsD, H, TTair
Q96300At3g0252014-3-3-like protein GF14 nuGRF70.7550.0060.6770.002Binding of protein with phosphor ylated amino acidsD, TTair
Q9LJX0At3g28860ABC transporter B family member 19ABCB190.7200.0190.7530.009Auxin transportD, H, S, T, MLin and Wang, 2005
P31166At1g27450Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase 1APT10.7160.0160.6890.043Adenine phosphorylationD, H, TAllen et al., 2002
Q9LP53At1g29250Alba DNA/RNA-binding proteinF28N24.70.6800.0270.5270.008Binding of nucleic acidD, H, S, TTair
F4KG20At5g46110Triose phosphate/phosphate translocator TPTAPE20.6080.0050.7840.043Transport of triose phosphateD, H, S, T, MTair
O23138At1g22840Probable cytochrome cCYC20.3560.0000.5170.037Electron transportIntegral/peripheral membrane proteinBirchmeier et al., 1976; Welchen et al., 2012
P11490At1g76100Plastocyanin minor isoformPETE0.1860.0310.1850.028Electron transportD, H, S, TPesaresi et al., 2009

List of common membrane proteins showing significant changes in cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29 mutants relative to WT and their biological functions.

*

Abbreviations for the shared proteins in Figures 2, 3.

a

Fold change at cut-off point >1.2 or < 0.8.

b

p < 0.05.

TMDs, transmembrane domains; D, Das; H, HMMTOP; S, SOSUI; T, TMPred; M, TMHMM.

Specific changes of cyp79B2/B3 membrane proteins

Sixty-four and 74 membrane proteins showed unique increases and decreases, respectively, in the cyp79B2/B3 mutant (Table 2). Seventy-seven new nodes were discovered by the STRING mapping of these cyp79B2/B3 proteins to the GMN (Figure 2). It was obvious that perturbation of the indolic Gls metabolism affected a group of stress-related membrane proteins forming new secondary nodes. Representative examples from this group are calmodulin-like protein 12 (CML12; Cazzonelli et al., 2014), mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 37c (MED37C; Lee et al., 2009), SNAP25 homologous protein (SNAP33; Eschen-Lippold et al., 2012), dynamin-related protein 1E (DRP1E; Minami et al., 2015), protein ILITYHIA (ILA; Monaghan and Li, 2010), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPC2; Guo et al., 2012), L-ascorbate peroxidase 3 (APX3; Narendra et al., 2006), Ras-related protein (RABA4B; Antignani et al., 2015), annexin D1 (ANN1; Gorecka et al., 2005; Jia et al., 2015), hypoxia-responsive family protein (At5g27760), and malate dehydrogenase 2 (mMDH2; Jones et al., 2006).

Table 2

AccessionLocus tagProtein nameAbbreviation*FCap-valuebFunctionTMDsReferences
Q42545At5g55280Cell division protein FtsZ homolog 1FTSZ12.2250.016Division of chloroplast and protein bindingD, TOsteryoung et al., 1998
P25071At2g41100Calmodulin-like protein 12CML122.0740.012Stimuli responseD, TCazzonelli et al., 2014
Q9S726At3g04790Probable ribose-5-phosphate isomerase 3RPI32.0340.005Bacterial response and management of pentose phosphate cycleD, H, TJones et al., 2006
O82533At2g36250Cell division FtsZ homolog 2-1FTSZ2-12.0320.012Division of chloroplast and protein bindingD, H, TOsteryoung et al., 1998
Q9LXJ0At3g52750Cell division FtsZ homolog 2-2FTSZ2-21.8230.031Division of chloroplast and protein bindingD, H, TMcAndrew et al., 2008
O82660At5g23120Photosystem II stability/assembly factor HCF136HCF1361.7700.010Photosynthesis processD, H, TMeurer et al., 1998
Q94K76At5g18470Curculin-like (Mannose-binding) lectin family proteinAT5G184701.7690.035Binding of carbohydrateD, H, S, T, MTair
Q93VK7At5g14910At5g14910/F2G14_30AT5G149101.7520.036Metal transportMemebrane associatedTair, Friso et al., 2004
P53492At5g09810Actin-7ACT71.7520.004Stress response and growthD, TJelenska et al., 2014
P56757AtCg00120ATP synthase subunit alphaATPA11.7500.044Bacterial and cold response and synthesis of ATPTJones et al., 2006
F4JRH9At4g12880Early nodulin-like protein 19ENODL191.7150.010Stimuli response and electron carrierD, H, S, T, MTair
P22954At5g02490Probable mediator of RNA polymerase II subunit 37cMED37D1.6830.017Bacterial, viral and heat response and transcription controlD, H, TUniprot
P0CJ46At2g37620Actin-1ACT11.6760.003Growth and ATP bindingD, TKandasamy et al., 2002; tair
P19366AtCg00480ATP synthase subunit betaATPB1.6610.050Fungal and cold response and ATP metabolismD, TMukherjee et al., 2010; tair
Q9AST9At1g73110At1g73110/F3N23_39AT1G731101.6140.036Hydrolysis process and binding of ATPD, H, TTair
Q8LEQ0At5g4770060S acidic ribosomal protein P1-3RPP1C1.5940.023Translation and binding of proteinD, H, TTair
Q9SUS3At4g11380Beta-adaptin-like protein BBETAB-AD1.5880.010Transport of proteinD, TTair
F4HR88At1g33590Leucine-rich repeat (LRR) proteinAT1G335901.5820.004Defense processD, H, T, MAscencio-Ibáñez et al., 2008
Q9LPV8At1g12920Eukaryotic peptide chain release factor subunit 1-2ERF1-21.5770.027Termination of translationD, TTair
Q8H107-3At4g26910Isoform 3 of dihydrolipoyllysine-residue succinyltransferaseAT4G269101.5770.024L-lysine catabolism and a member of tricarboxylic acid cycleD, H, TTair
P17745At4g20360Elongation factor TuTUFA1.5630.006Translation, binding of GTP and Cys nitrosylationD, TTair
Q9LHA8At3g12580Mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 37cMED37C1.5430.003Response to stressD, TLee et al., 2009
Q940B8At3g16630Kinesin-13AKINESIN-13A1.5240.027Binding of ATPD, HTair
F4HW29At1g08450Calreticulin-3CRT31.5200.010Defense processD, H, S, T, MSun et al., 2014
P23321At5g66570Oxygen-evolving enhancer proteinPSBO11.5140.019Bacterial response and photosynthesis processD, H, TTair; Murakami et al., 2002
Q8L940At5g01410Pyridoxal biosynthesis protein PDX1.3PDX131.4670.020Stress responseTCzégény et al., 2014
Q96292At3g18780Actin-2ACT21.4630.003Red light response and root growthD, TKandasamy et al., 2002; tair
Q8VZC7-2At5g45510Isoform 2 of Probable disease resistance proteinAT5G455101.4550.018Defense processD, TDesveaux et al., 2005
Q9LET7At3g56690Calmodulin-interacting protein 111CIP1111.4420.042Hydrolysis and binding of ATPD, TTair
Q8LCA1At2g46820Protein curvature thylakoid 1BCURT1B1.4360.035Photosynthesis and DNA bindingD, H, S, T, MTair
Q9LZF5At5g03350Lectin-like protein At5g03350AT5G033501.4260.010Salicylic acid and immunological responseD, H, TArmijo et al., 2013
O81742At4g23460Beta-adaptin-like protein CBETAC-AD1.4170.016Transport of proteinD, TTair
Q9FJH6At5g60790ABC transporter F family member 1ABCF11.4040.002Transport process and Binding of ATPD, H, TTair
Q39251At3g46000Actin-depolymerizing factor 2ADF21.3990.001Depolymerization of actinMembraneTair and Abe et al., 1996
O22265At2g47450Signal recognition particle 43 kDaCAO1.3960.020Response to lightD, TWalter et al., 2015
P56753AtCg01110NAD(P)H-quinone oxidoreductase subunit HNDHH1.3740.034Photosynthesis and oxidation reduction activitiesD, TTair
Q9SRY4At1g02910Protein low PSII accumulation 1LPA11.3680.016Member of photosystemD, H, S, T, MPeng et al., 2006
Q9SL67At2g2014026S proteasome regulatory subunit 4 homolog BRPT2B1.3610.007Hydrolysis of ATP and generation of gametesD, TTair
Q9FXA1At1g49750At1g49750 proteinAT1G497501.3400.034D, H, S, TTair
A8MS75At3g54890Light-harvesting complex I chlorophyll a/b binding protein 1LHCA11.3390.018Photosynthetic processD, H, S, TTair
Q9SR77At3g10130Heme-binding-like proteinAT3G101301.3300.024Binding of hemeD, TTair
P22953At5g02500Probable mediator of RNA polymerase II subunit 37eMED37E1.3280.004Immunity responseD, TNoël et al., 2007
F4ISI7At2g19480Nucleosome assembly protein 12NAP1; 21.3180.027Repair and binding of DNADIglesias et al., 2013
Q9LIK9At3g22890ATP sulfurylase 1APS11.3050.039Biosynthesis of hydrogen sulfideD, TTair
Q9SJZ7At2g22360Molecular chaperone DnaJAT2G223601.3040.025Heat response and binding activityD, TTair
O65719At3g09440Heat shock 70 kDa protein 3HSP70-31.3000.030Viral and heat response and binding activityD, TAgudelo-Romero et al., 2008; Palmblad et al., 2008; Tair
B3H5R4At5g58260At5g58260 proteinAT5G582601.2980.009Fungal response and oxidation reduction reactionsDMukherjee et al., 2010; Tair
Q9FMA3At5g56290Peroxisome biogenesis protein 5PEX51.2940.017Movement of proteins to peroxisomeD, TRamón and Bartel, 2010
O80885At2g32480Arabidopsis serin proteaseARASP1.2740.038Proteolytic action and stress responseD, H, S, T, MSokolenko et al., 2002
Q42044At2g45180Bifunctional inhibitor/lipid-transfer protein/seed storage 2S albuminAT2G451801.2710.032Proteolytic action and lipid transportD, H, S, T, MTair
F4JTP5At4g38470ACT-like protein tyrosine kinaseAT4G384701.2700.042Kinase and binding activitiesD, H, TTair
Q9S7P9At5g61210SNAP25 homologous proteinSNAP331.2640.035Immunity processDEschen-Lippold et al., 2012
Q9M0F9At4g292206-phosphofructokinase 1PFK11.2620.043Fructose 6 phosphate metabolism and glycolysisD, TMustroph et al., 2007
Q8L7L0At5g18570GTP-binding protein OBGCOBGL1.2500.010Stimuli responseD, TChen et al., 2014
Q9FNX5At3g60190Dynamin-related protein 1EDRP1E1.2460.005Cold responseD, TMinami et al., 2015; tair
Q8RY46At1g70610ABC B family member 26ABCB261.2370.007Transport activityD, H, S, T, MTair
Q39142At2g34430Light-harvesting chlorophyll protein complex II subunit B1Lhb1B11.2320.049Photosynthetic processD, H, S, TTair
P92549AtMg01190ATP synthase subunit alphaATPA21.2270.005Oxidative stress responseD, TSweetlove et al., 2002
Q9SA78At1g30630Coatomer subunit epsilon-1AT1G306301.2260.006Transport processD, TTair
F4J0B1At3g28520AAA-type ATPase family proteinAT3G285201.2260.039Binding and hydrolysis of ATPD, TTair
Q9ZPH9At4g00750Probable methyltransferase PMT15AT4G007501.2180.024Stress response and methylation processD, H, S, T, MRama Devi et al., 2006; tair
F4I894At1g64790Protein ILITYHIAILA1.2170.017Immunity processD, H, S, TMonaghan and Li, 2010
O49636At4g22310At4g22310AT4G223101.2130.007Transport of pyruvateD, TTair
P56754Atcg00420NAD(P)H-quinone oxidoreductase subunit JNDHJ1.2070.036Oxidation reduction and response to sulfur deficiencyD, TTair
Q9FX54At1g13440Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase GAPC2GAPC20.7980.013Stress responseD, TGuo et al., 2012
P19456At4g30190ATPase 2, plasma membrane-typeAHA20.7980.048ATP metabolismD, H, S, T, MTair
P42761At2g30870Glutathione S-transferase F10GSTF100.7980.025Indolic glucosinolate biosynthesisD, H, TMostafa et al., 2016
Q9LNH6At1g48240Novel plant SNARE 12NPSN120.7930.006Transport of proteinD, H, S, T, MTair
F4ICF5At1g25290RHOMBOID-like protein 10RBL100.7900.001Root and flower growthD, H, T, MThompson et al., 2012
O65282At5g2072020kDa chaperoninCPN210.7890.021Defense processPlasma membraneKawamura and Uemura, 2003, Takáč et al., 2014
Q84MC0At3g06035Uncharacterized GPI-anchored proteinAT3G060350.7880.035Precursor for glycoproteinD, H, S, T, MTair
Q9FK25At5g54160Flavone 3'-O-methyltransferase 1OMT10.7870.003Flavonoid metabolismD, TMuzac et al., 2000
Q9FJN8At5g65270Ras-related protein RABA4aRABA4A0.7860.003Binding of GTP and pollen tube growthD, TTair; Szumlanski and Nielsen, 2009
P92963At4g17170Ras-related protein RABB1cRABB1C0.7850.029Binding of GTP and transport activityD, TTair
P56759Atcg00130ATP synthase subunit bATPF0.7830.012Respiration processD, H, T, MTair
P93834At2g19860Hexokinase-2HXK20.7820.047Phosphorylation of hexosesD, H, S, T, MJang et al., 1997
Q9CAD6At1g63710Cytochrome P450 86A7CYP86A70.7810.023Oxidation reduction and metabolism of fatty acidD, H, S, T, MDuan and Schuler, 2005
O81016At2g26910ABC transporter G family member 32ABCG320.7800.037Transport activity and cuticle formationD, H, S, T, MTair; Bessire et al., 2011
A8MQG9At1g73650Uncharacterized proteinAT1G736500.7790.021Oxidation reduction reactions and lipid metabolismD, H, S, T, MTair
Q9C6X2At1g32050Secretory carrier-associated membrane protein 4SCAMP40.7780.025Carrier activityD, H, S, T, MLaw et al., 2012
Q96282At5g49890Chloride channel protein CLC-cCLC-C0.7770.002Salt stressD, H, S, T, MJossier et al., 2010
A8MQG9At1g73650Uncharacterized proteinAT1G736500.7790.021Oxidation reduction reactions and lipid metabolismD, H, S, T, MTair
Q9C6X2At1g32050Secretory carrier-associated membrane protein 4SCAMP40.7780.025Carrier activityD, H, S, T, MLaw et al., 2012
Q96282At5g49890Chloride channel protein CLC-cCLC-C0.7770.002Salt stressD, H, S, T, MJossier et al., 2010
Q9STT2At3g47810Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 29VPS290.7760.044Transport activityMembrane associatedJaillais et al., 2007; Zelazny et al., 2013
Q42564At4g35000L-ascorbate peroxidase 3APX30.7750.041Antioxidant action and stress responseD, H, T, MNarendra et al., 2006; tair
Q8VZM7At5g02940Putative ion channel POLLUX-like 1AT5G029400.7740.043Transport of ionsD, H, S, T, MTair
Q8LB17At3g58460Uncharacterized proteinAT3G584600.7740.030Proteolytic actionD, H, S, T, MKnopf and Adam, 2012
Q8LCP6At1g75680Endoglucanase 10AT1G756800.7730.000Cellulase and hydrolase actionD, H, S, T, MTair
Q94CI7At5g27350Sugar transporter ERD6-like 17SFP10.7720.012Carbohydrate transportD, H, S, T, MQuirino et al., 2001
Q39099At2g06850Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/ hydrolase protein 4XTH40.7700.027Stimuli response, cell wall development and hydrolase actionD, H, S, T, MCampbell and Braam, 1999; tair
Q944A7At4g35230Probable serine/threonine-protein kinaseAT4G352300.7630.026Immunity process and phosphorylation of proteinsD, TShi et al., 2013; tair
Q949R9At5g20090Mitochondrial pyruvate carrier 1AT5G200900.7630.046Transport of pyruvateD, H, TLi et al., 2014
Q9LTL0At3g26290Cytochrome P450 71B26CYP71B260.7600.028Binding of oxygenD, H, S, T, MTair
Q9SMQ6At4g39990Ras-related protein RABA4bRABA4B0.7540.017Defense processD, TAntignani et al., 2015
Q9C5M0At5g19760Dicarboxylate/tricarboxylate transporter DTCDTC0.7500.021Dicarboxylate transportD, H, TPicault et al., 2002
O82204At2g1973060S ribosomal protein L28-1RPL28A0.7480.032TranslationTair
Q9LFA3At3g52880Probable monodehydroascorbate reductase isoform 3AT3G528800.7450.024Oxidation reductionD, H, TLisenbee et al., 2005
Q9SEL6At5g39510Vesicle transport v-SNARE 11VTI110.7400.001TransportD, H, S, T, MTair
Q9LPZ3At1g11410G-type lectin S-receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinaseAT1G114100.7330.049Kinase and binding activitiesD, H, S, T, MTair
Q8LE26At2g38480CASP-like protein At2g38480AT2G384800.7290.002D, H, T, MTair
P43287At2g37170Aquaporin PIP2-2PIP2-20.7250.011Water deficiency response and transportD, H, S, T, MJavot, 2003; Tournaire-Roux et al., 2003;
Q9SYT0At1g35720Annexin D1ANN10.7190.046Salt stress, binding and transport activitiesDGorecka et al., 2005; Jia et al., 2015
Q9M1E7At3g45600Tetraspanin-3TET30.7190.042Member of aging processD, H, S, T, MTair
Q39101At5g01600Ferritin-1FER10.7130.027Bacterial and stress response and iron homeostasisD, H, TTair
F4JP88At4g17615Calcineurin B-like protein 1CBL10.7120.029Stress responseAssociated with membrane kinaseRen et al., 2013; Feng et al., 2015
F4JIN3At4g21180DnaJ / Sec63 Brl domains-containing proteinATERDJ2B0.7120.044Transport of proteinD, H, S, T, MTair
O23482At4g16370Oligopeptide transporter 3OPT30.7050.035Transport activityD, H, S, T, MWintz et al., 2003
Q9C8G5At1g30360Early-responsive to dehydration stress proteinT4K22.40.7030.007Water deficiency (stress) response and ion transportD, H, S, T, MRai et al., 2016; tair
Q8L8Z1At4g15630CASP-like protein At4g15630AT4G156300.7010.024Binding of proteinD, H, S, T, MTair
Q9FYK0At1g24650Leucine-rich repeat protein kinase F21J9.31LRR-RLK0.7010.043Growth process.D, S, T, MDai et al., 2013
Q8GWP3At2g26975Copper transporter 6COPT60.7000.005Transport of copperD, H, S, T, MGarcia-Molina et al., 2013
Q8LG60At5g27760Hypoxia-responsive family proteinAT5G277600.6980.029Oxygen deficiency responseD, H, TTair
Q9FF88At5g23920At5g23920AT5G239200.6950.038……D, H, S, T, MTair
Q8LAA6At4g23400Probable aquaporin PIP1-5PIP1-50.6940.049Controls water channels, salt stress responseD, H, S, T, MWeig et al., 1997; Tair
Q93XY5At2g20230Tetraspanin-18TOM2AH20.6900.049….…D, H, S, T, MTair
P30302At2g37180Aquaporin PIP2-3PIP2-30.6850.003Salt stress and water deficiencyD, H, S, T, MDaniels et al., 1994
Q8RWZ6At2g01420Auxin efflux carrier component 4PIN40.6830.019Transport of auxinD, H, S, T, MZhang et al., 2015
A1XJK0At1g18320Mitochondrial inner membrane translocase subunit TIM22-4TIM22-40.6680.044Transport of proteinD, H, S, T, MTair
Q39196At4g00430Probable aquaporin PIP1-4PIP1-40.6670.006Water deficiency response and transportD, H, S, T, MLi et al., 2015; Tair
Q9LZI2At3g62830UDP-glucuronic acid decarboxylase 2UXS20.6640.049Xylose metabolismD, H, S, T, MHarper and Bar-Peled, 2002
Q9LIL4At3g22845Transmembrane emp24 domain-containing protein p24beta3AT3G228450.6520.038Transport activityD, H, T, MTair
Q9CAN1At1g63120RHOMBOID-like protein 2F16M19.40.6460.018Proteolytic activityD, H, S, T, MKanaoka et al., 2005
Q9SUV2At4g32390Probable sugar phosphate/phosphate translocatorAT4G323900.6400.019Transport activityD, H, S, T, MTair
Q8GYN5At3g25070RPM1-interacting protein 4RIN40.6330.043Bacterial response and immunity processDAxtell and Staskawicz, 2003
Q9LVE0At3g21670Protein NRT1/ PTR FAMILY 6.4NPF6.40.6280.031Transport activity and nitrate synthesisD, H, S, T, MOkamoto et al., 2003
Q9LFS3At5g160103-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase family proteinF1N13_1500.6270.007Oxidation reduction reactions and lipid metabolismD, H, S, T, MTair
Q9FQ24At3g55005Protein TONNEAU 1bTON1B0.6170.001Growth process and organization of microtubuleD, TAzimzadeh et al., 2008
B9DFR9At2g45960Plasma membrane intrinsic protein 1B, At2g45960 proteinPIP1B0.6150.005Water deficiencyD, H, S, T, MAlexandersson et al., 2005
O23596At4g17550Putative glycerol-3-phosphate transporter 4AT4G175500.6130.009Transport activityD, H, S, T, MTair
Q9LVM5At5g58220Allantoin synthase/Uric acid degradation bifunctional proteinTTL0.6110.030Cell growth control, allantoin biosynthesis and catabolism of urateD, H, TTair
Q08733At1g01620Aquaporin PIP1-3PIP1-30.6010.020Water deficiency response and transportD, H, S, T, MKammerloher et al., 1994
Q8VZQ3At1g17200CASP-like protein At1g17200AT1G172000.5900.016Binding activityD, H, S, T, MTair
Q9M386At3g54200Late embryogenesis abundant hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteinF24B22.1600.5880.004….…D, H, S, T, MTair
F4I082At1g55260Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored lipid protein transfer 6AT1G552600.5830.002Binding and transport of lipidD, TEdstam and Edqvist, 2014
Q9FN38At5g53880Putative uncharacterized proteinAT5G538800.5760.012……D, TTair
F4JDN8At3g26700Protein kinase family proteinAT3G267000.5440.025Kinase actionD, H, S, T, MTair
Q9ZV07At2g39010Probable aquaporin PIP2-6PIP2-60.5310.022Controls water channelsD, H, S, T, MAlexandersson et al., 2010
P93004At4g35100Aquaporin PIP2-7PIP2-70.5260.032Salt stress responseD, H, S, T, MWeig et al., 1997
F4JY28At5g18630Putative class 3 lipaseAT5G186300.5130.008Lipid metabolismD, H, S, T, MTair
A8MQK3At3g15020Malate dehydrogenase 2mMDH20.4140.028Bacterial response and carbohydrate metabolismD, H, TJones et al., 2006, Tair

List of membrane proteins in the cyp79B2/B3 mutant showing significant changes relative to WT and their biological functions.

*

Abbreviations for unique proteins in Figure 2.

a

Fold change at cut-off point >1.2 or < 0.8.

b

p < 0.05.

TMDs, transmembrane domains; D, Das; H, HMMTOP; S, SOSUI; T, TMPred; M, TMHMM.

The role of cytochromes P450s 86A7 (CYP86A7) and 71B26 (CYP71B26) in oxidation reduction reaction and oxygen binding (Duan and Schuler, 2005) makes them biologically relevant tertiary nodes in the GMN (Figures 2, 4). Other interesting new tertiary nodes related to Gls metabolism include division protein FtsZ homologs 1 (FTSZ1), 2-1 (FTSZ2-1), 2-2 (FTSZ2-2), curculin-like (mannose-binding) lectin family protein (At5g18470), isoform 3 of dihydrolipoyllysine-residue succinyltransferase component of 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex 2 (At4g26910), elongation factor Tu (TUFA), ATP sulfurylase 1 (APS1), ABC transporter B family member 26 (ABCB26), flavone 3'-O-methyltransferase 1 (OMT1), Ras-related protein (RABA4A), Ras-related protein (RABB1C), endoglucanase 10 (AT1G75680), dicarboxylate/tricarboxylate transporter (DTC), probable monodehydroascorbate reductase isoform 3 (At3g52880), vesicle transport v-SNARE 11 (VTI11), DnaJ/Sec63 Brl domains-containing protein (ATERDJ2B), and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored lipid protein transfer 6 (At1g55260). Myrosin cells (myrosinase storage sites) endocytosis is controlled by SYP22 from SNARE complex and VPS9A (Shirakawa et al., 2016). Here the decrease of VTI11 from this family is in agreement with the reduced myrosinase, nitrile specifier protein and Gls levels in the soluble proteome (Mostafa et al., 2016) and supports the cross talk between Gls and its hydrolyzing enzymes.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Predicted positions of the directly connected nodes and connected cytochrome nodes on the glucosinolate metabolic pathway. Italic indicates proteins changed in both mutants, * indicates proteins changed in cyp79B2/B3, and ** indicates proteins changed in myb28/29. Red color means increased proteins, green color means decreased proteins. Full names of the directly connected proteins can be found in the abbreviation and protein name columns in Tables 13.

Out of these new nodes, 15 formed direct edges with the GMN: FTSZ1, CML12, FTSZ2-2, At5g18470, At4g26910, TUFA, MED37C, APS1, SNAP33, ILA, GAPC2, OMT1, CYP71B26, ANN1, and mMDH2 in addition to the membrane associated protein (20 kDa chaperonin, CPN21). As we detected a side network correlated to indolic GMN (Mostafa et al., 2016), here we also found a side network strongly correlated to indolic Gls metabolism as it contains nine stress-related proteins out of eleven. These proteins are xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase protein 4 (XTH4; Campbell and Braam, 1999), aquaporin PIP2-2 (Javot, 2003; Tournaire-Roux et al., 2003), probable aquaporin PIP1-5 (Weig et al., 1997), aquaporin PIP2-3 (Daniels et al., 1994), probable aquaporin PIP1-4 (Li et al., 2015), plasma membrane intrinsic protein 1B (PIP1B; Alexandersson et al., 2005), aquaporin PIP1-3 (Kammerloher et al., 1994), probable aquaporin PIP2-6 (Alexandersson et al., 2010), and aquaporin PIP2-7 (Weig et al., 1997). Other members in this side network are bifunctional inhibitor/lipid-transfer protein (At2g45180; which has a proteolytic action) and a tetraspanin-18 (TOM2AH2) with unknown functions.

Specific changes of myb28/29 membrane proteins

Membrane proteomics of the myb28/29 mutant showed 28 and 17 proteins to be significantly increased and decreased, respectively (Table 3). STRING analysis of the increased and decreased myb28/29 specific membrane proteins revealed 21 new nodes in the GMN (Figure 3). Except for the directly connected and stress-related GTP-binding nuclear protein (RAN1; Jiang et al., 2007), other connections including 17 ribosomal proteins [e.g., 60S ribosomal protein L14-2 (RPL14B), 40S ribosomal protein S15-1 (RPS15) and 40S ribosomal protein S15-4 (RPS15D)], and actin-11 (ACT11), ADP/ATP carrier protein 1 (AAC1) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit F (TIF3F1) formed tertiary nodes. These tertiary nodes are connected to the GMN through two bridges (directly connected nodes) which are 60S ribosomal protein L15-1(RPL15A) and 60S ribosomal protein L13-1 (BBC1). The expression changes in ribosomal proteins reflect a correlation between aliphatic Gls perturbation and the translation process in A. thaliana.

Table 3

Accession numberLocus tagProtein nameAbbreviation*FCap-valuebFunctionTMDsReferences
P51422At3g5575060S ribosomal protein L35a-4RPL35AD1.9720.025Translation and RNA bindingTair
Q9T043At4g2709060S ribosomal protein L14-2RPL14B1.9280.040Translation and RNA bindingDTair
Q9LST0At5g60160AT5g60160/f15l12_20AT5G601601.6860.026Proteolytic activityD, H, TTair
Q9LZ57At5g0245060S ribosomal protein L36-3RPL36C1.6530.024TranslationDTair
Q9M0E2At4g2941060S ribosomal protein L28-2RPL28C1.5930.009Translation and RNA bindingTair
F4I472At1g0427040S ribosomal protein S15-1RPS151.5010.025TranslationD, H, TTair
Q8W463At4g1756050S ribosomal protein L19-1AT4G175601.4880.030TranslationD, H, TTair
Q9FY64At5g0951040S ribosomal protein S15-4RPS15D1.4610.036TranslationD, H, TTair
O23515At4g1672060S ribosomal protein L15-1RPL15A1.4170.016TranslationTair
Q9LZ41At5g0261060S ribosomal protein L35-4RPL35D1.4110.010TranslationDTair
F4HRB4At1g45201Triacylglycerol lipase-like 1TLL11.3740.025Hydrolysis of lipidsD, H, S, T, MTair
Q9SUJ1-2At3g05710Isoform 2 of Syntaxin-43SYP431.3720.026Fungal response and transporter activityD, H, S, T, MZheng et al., 1999; Nielsen and Thordal-Christensen, 2012
Q93VG5At5g2029040S ribosomal protein S8-1RPS8A1.3590.028TranslationDTair
B9DGY1At3g07700ABC1 kinaseAT3G077001.3510.012Oxidative stress responseD, H, T, MYang et al., 2012
A8MQA1At3g4901060S ribosomal protein L13-1BBC11.3490.041Translation and RNA bindingTair
P49693At4g0223060S ribosomal protein L19-3RPL19C1.3310.023Translation and RNA bindingTair
O22795At2g3345050S ribosomal protein L28RPL281.3310.032Translation and RNA bindingTair
Q9C514At1g4883040S ribosomal protein S7-1RPS7A1.3270.031TranslationDTair
P49637At1g7060060S ribosomal protein L27a-3RPL27AC1.2740.006Translation and RNA bindingTair
F4IHJ8At2g2158040S ribosomal protein S25-2AT2G215801.2730.032TranslationDTair
P53496At3g12110Actin-11ACT111.2670.014Cytoskeleton component, Binding of ATPD, TMcDowell et al., 1996; Jia et al., 2013
Q9FH02At5g42270ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease FTSH 5FTSH51.2400.012Leaf coloration and photo-inhibitionD, H, TSakamoto et al., 2002
P31167At3g08580ADP, ATP carrier protein 1AAC11.2380.015Transport activitiesD, H, T, MTair
P51418At2g3448060S ribosomal protein L18a-2RPL18AB1.2290.028TranslationTair
Q9LVI9At3g17810Putative dehydrogenasePYD1A1.2240.016Oxidation reduction reactions, pyrimidine and uracil metabolismD, TZrenner et al., 2009
Q8RWA5At1g25380Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide transporter 2NDT21.2230.043Transport activitiesD, H, TBedhomme et al., 2005
Q8W486At1g04910O-fucosyltransferase family proteinAT1G049101.2130.042Glycosyl groups transferD, H, S, T, MVoxeur et al., 2012
P51427At3g1194040S ribosomal protein S5-2RPS5B1.2060.002Translation and RNA bindingD, TTair
O04202At2g39990Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit FTIF3F10.7990.029Translation and development of embryoD, TXia et al., 2010
Q9FQ25At3g55000Protein TONNEAU 1aTON1A0.7820.046Cell division and cytoskeleton organizationD, TAzimzadeh et al., 2008
Q84LG4At3g09800Coatomer subunit zeta-2AT3G098000.7730.049Transport of proteinD, H, TTair
P41916At5g20010GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran-1RAN10.7700.002Salt stress response and GTP bindingD, TJiang et al., 2007
Q9ZVA2At1g78830At1g78830/F9K20_12F9K20.120.7670.017Binding of carbohydrateD, H, S, T, MTair
Q9FIX1At5g39730AIG2-like proteinAT5G397300.7400.021Salt stress responseDTair
Q9LS26At5g46570At5g46570BSK20.7400.036Kinase activityD, TTair
Q93ZH0-2At1g21880Isoform 2 of LysM domain-containing GPI-anchored protein 1LYM10.7380.005Immunity and defense activityD, H, S, T, MWillmann et al., 2011
Q94EG6At5g02240Uncharacterized proteinAT5G022400.7340.040Abscisic acid responseD, TGhelis et al., 2008
Q0WSY2At1g19835Filament-like plant protein 4FPP40.7250.036DTair
Q9C500At1g47200WPP domain-containing protein 2WPP20.7160.049Growth of lateral roots and mitotic divisionDPatel, 2004
Q9FIJ2At5g47890NADH dehydrogenase 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 2AT5G478900.6900.050Oxidation reduction reactionsMitochondrial membraneMichalecka et al., 2003, Murray et al., 2003
Q9FPJ4At5g47200Ras-related protein RABD2bRABD2B0.6870.013Binding of GTPD, TTair
Q94F08At5g62630HIPL2 proteinHIPL20.6780.004Binding of carbohydrate and oxidation reduction reactionD, H, S, TTair
Q9SZ51At4g31840Early nodulin-like protein 15ENODL150.6660.017Stimuli response and electron carrierD, H, S, T, MTair
P48421At4g13770Cytochrome P450 83A1CYP83A10.6640.033Glucosinolate biosynthesis, insect responseD, H, S, T, MMostafa et al., 2016
Q9SK39At2g24940Probable steroid-binding protein 3MP30.3760.031Binding of steroid and hemeMembrane associatedTair, Yang et al., 2005

List of membrane proteins the myb28/29 mutant showing significant level changes relative to WT and their biological functions.

*

Abbreviations for unique proteins in Figure 3.

a

Fold change at cut-off point >1.2 or < 0.8.

b

p < 0.05.

TMDs, transmembrane domains; D, Das; H, HMMTOP; S, SOSUI; T, TMPred; M, TMHMM.

Gene ontology analysis of the significantly changed membrane proteins

AgriGO enrichment analysis of the changed proteins was conducted at the biological processes (BP), cellular components (CC), and molecular functions (MF) levels. By annotating 147 changed membrane proteins in the cyp79B2/B3 using SEA, we got 302 enriched GO terms for BP (Supplementary Figure 1), 63 for CC (Supplementary Figure 2), and 47 for MF (Supplementary Figure 3). SEA of 54 changed membrane proteins in the myb28/29 showed 45 enriched GO terms for BP (Supplementary Figure 4), 56 for CC (Supplementary Figure 5) and 2 for MF (Supplementary Figure 6). SEACOMPARE of the mutant revealed 271 BP, 21 CC, and 46 MF GO terms to be enriched specifically in cyp79B2/B3, while 14 BP, 14 CC, and one MF were the specifically enriched GO terms in myb28/29 (Supplementary Table 4). From this BP analysis, it was obvious that responses to stimuli including abiotic, chemical and stress were highly enriched in cyp79B2/B3 in addition to transport, photosynthesis and metabolic processes. In myb28/29, the most enriched BP terms were those related to translation process. This observation supported our results concerning the stimuli and translation-related proteins in the cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29, respectively (Supplementary Table 4). On the level of CC, the high enrichment of membrane GO terms supported the effectiveness of our membrane preparation procedure (Supplemental Figures 2, 5).

Comparison of protein expression data with transcription data

To determine whether protein level changes correlated with gene transcription changes, we examined the transcript levels of 32 and 22 genes from cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/28, respectively (Supplementary Table 5). The two mutants exhibited different patterns of correlation. In comparison of cyp79B2/B3 to WT, the genes investigated showed a positive correlation between transcript and protein levels in both direction and degree of expression (r = 0.6579, p = 4.269e−05; Supplementary Figure 7). However, in comparison of myb28/29 to WT, the genes did not show correlation between the transcript and protein levels (r = 0.0887, p = 0.6945; Supplementary Figure 7), only three out of the 22 genes showed similar regulation at both transcript and protein levels. For example, At4g13770 encoding cytochrome P450 83A1, exhibited down-regulation in myb28/29 compared to WT (Supplementary Table 5). The difference in the degree of correlation in these two mutants implies that different regulatory mechanisms are involved in the transcriptional and posttranscriptional processes in different genotypes (Marmagne et al., 2010; Koh et al., 2012).

Discussion

As a result of Gls metabolism perturbation, many changes in the levels of soluble (Mostafa et al., 2016) and membrane proteins took place. It was interesting to discover new cytochromes to be involved in the GMN. In addition, several groups of stress and defense-related proteins as well as binding and transport activity proteins were related to the indolic and aliphatic GMNs, in addition to a group of ribosomal proteins in the myb28/29 mutant.

Three new cytochromes in the glucosinolate molecular network

Cytochromes play a key role in Gls biosynthesis. In aliphatic Gls biosynthesis, CYP79F1 and CYP79F2 catalyze the conversion of chain-elongated methionines to aldoximes, which are metabolized by another cytochrome (CYP83A1) to aci-nitro compounds, precursors of desulphoglucosinolates (Grubb and Abel, 2006). As to indolic Gls biosynthesis, CYP79B2 and CYP79B3 convert tryptophan to aldoximes, that are metabolized by CYP83B1 to form the aci-nitro compounds (Grubb and Abel, 2006). In addition, there is another CYP81F2 catalyzing the conversion of indolic-3-glucosinolate to 4-hydroxy-indolic-3-glucosinolate (Sønderby et al., 2010). Furthermore, CYP71A12 and CYP71A13 can metabolize indolic aldoximes to indole acetonitrile and subsequently indole acetic acid derivatives (Nafisi et al., 2007). In our previous study, we reported cytochrome B5 isoform C and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5b-2 to be new nodes in the aliphatic and indolic GMNs, respectively (Mostafa et al., 2016). Here we discovered cytochrome P450 86A7 (CYP86A7) in redox reaction and metabolism of fatty acids (Duan and Schuler, 2005), and cytochrome P450 71B26 (CYP71B26) as new nodes in the indolic GMN. Based on STRING analysis, CYP71B26 is connected to CYP81F2 through a direct edge, while CYP86A7 is connected indirectly to CYP81F2 through lectin family proteins (At5g03350 and At5g18470; Figures 2, 4). Given that their connection to a specific and key enzyme in indolic Gls biosynthetic pathway (CYP81F2) and their expression levels were decreased in the cyp79B2/B3 mutant (Table 2), it is reasonable to hypothesize that CYP86A7 and CYP71B26 play specific roles in 4-hydroxy indolic-3-glucosinolate production (Figure 4). Especially their precursor (indolic-3-glucosinolate) and the product were decreased in cyp79B2/B3 mutant as revealed in our previous study (Mostafa et al., 2016). Also by similarity, we can predict a role for the enzymes in hydroxy indolic-1-glucosinolate production (Figure 5) as its synthesizing enzymes are not known (Sønderby et al., 2010). The third new cytochrome discovered in this study is a probable cytochrome c At1Gg22840 (CYC2), which plays a role in electron transport process (Welchen et al., 2012). CYC2 is in the shared decreased protein category, forming new connections with aliphatic GMN through ADP/ATP carrier protein 1 (AAC1) and 60S ribosomal protein L15-1 (RPL15A), which is connected to GSTF9, GSTF10 and GSTF11, and with indolic GMN through eukaryotic peptide chain release factor subunit 1–2 (ERF1-2), 60S ribosomal protein L28-1 (RPL28A) and adenine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (APT1). APT1 is connected to GGP1 and SUR1. Although the CYC2 function awaits for further studies, it might play a role in the conversion of aci-nitro compounds to thiohydroximates.

Figure 5

Figure 5

Hypothesized roles of CYP86A7 and CYP71B26 in the hydroxylation of indolic-1-glucosinolate (top panel) and the potential dual functions of flavone 3′-O-methyltransferase in flavonoid and Gls metabolism. Circles indicate chemical modifications to the substrates.

Stress related membrane protein changes as a secondary result of glucosinolate metabolism perturbation

Plant Gls metabolism is responsive to stress conditions, e.g., temperature and light stress (Martínez-Ballesta et al., 2013), water stress (Khan et al., 2010), salt stress (Guo et al., 2013), and microbial stress (Clay et al., 2009). In our previous study, glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase, glutathione S-transferase F2 and glutathione S-transferase F7 in addition to others as stress-related proteins were found to connect to the Gls pathway (Mostafa et al., 2016). Here we found the levels of 51 stress-related proteins changed significantly in the cyp79B2/B3 mutant and six with changes in the myb28/29 mutant. In the cyp79B2/B3 membrane proteome, a group of general stimuli response-related proteins exhibited significant changes compared to WT (Table 2). Among them, the following are examples to directly connect with Gls enzymes: calmodulin-like protein 12 (CML12; Cazzonelli et al., 2014; connected to the indolic GMN via MYB122 and CYP81F2), mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 37c (MED37C; Lee et al., 2009; connected via GSTF9 to GMN, with possible role in thiohydroximate formation), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPC2; Guo et al., 2012; formed edges with GMN through MYB28, MYB29, MYB76, and MYB34, suggesting roles in methionine chain-elongation and tryptophan synthesis; Figures 2, 4). It is known that GAPC2 participates in the oxidation of glyceraldehydes-3-phophate to glycerate from which pyruvate is formed. The pyruvate can be converted to acetylCoA for methionine chain-elongation in aliphatic Gls biosynthesis or for synthesis of tryptophan in indolic Gls pathway (Mann, 1987). Both glucosinolate classes were decreased in the cyp79B2/B3 mutant in our previous study (Mostafa et al., 2016) together with GAPC2 in this study. Therefore, the connection between GAPC2 and MYBs in the STRING maps reflects functional relationship and does not necessarily indicate direct physical interaction. Another stress related group showing expression level changes was the salt stress and water deficiency group represented by chloride channel protein CLC-c (Jossier et al., 2010), aquaporin PIP2-2 (Javot, 2003; Tournaire-Roux et al., 2003), annexin D1 (ANN1; Gorecka et al., 2005; Jia et al., 2015; formed edge with GSTF9), early-responsive to dehydration stress protein (Rai et al., 2016), probable aquaporin PIP1-5 (Weig et al., 1997), aquaporin PIP2-3 (Daniels et al., 1994), probable aquaporin PIP1-4 (Li et al., 2015), plasma membrane intrinsic protein 1B (Alexandersson et al., 2005), aquaporin PIP1-3 (Kammerloher et al., 1994), probable aquaporin PIP2-6 (Alexandersson et al., 2010), and aquaporin PIP2-7 (Weig et al., 1997; Figures 2, 4). The decreased expression of this group of aquaporins (Table 2) confirms crosstalk between indolic Gls production and water deficiency enzymes (Khan et al., 2010). The mechanism underlying such crosstalk is intriguing. The reduction in aquaporins potentiates our observation of retarded growth of Gls mutants (Mostafa et al., 2016). The decreased Gls production resulted in stress status, which led to decreased water uptake and decreased expression of aquaporins, and thus growth retardation.

The immunity and defense process was also affected by Gls perturbation, and it is represented by changes in the directly connected nodes: SNAP25 homologous protein (SNAP33; Eschen-Lippold et al., 2012; connected by MYB51 in tryptophan synthesis and CYP81F2 to GMN), protein ILITYHIA (ILA; Monaghan and Li, 2010; playing a role in methionine chain elongation by forming edges with IMD1, IMD2, and IMD3) and a 20 kDa chaperonin (CPN21; Takáč et al., 2014; connected to GMN by the edge GGP1; Figures 2, 4). Another protein exhibiting expression changes and connected to GMN is malate dehydrogenase 2 (mMDH2), which participates in bacterial defense (Jones et al., 2006; Figures 2, 4). In myb28/29, a GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran-1 (Jiang et al., 2007) was found to connect MYB28, MYB29, MYB76, MYB34, MYB51, and MYB122, suggesting its role in methionine chain-elongation and tryptophan synthesis (Figures 3, 4 and Table 3).

Effects of glucosinolate metabolism perturbation on other processes and nodes

Gls biosynthetic pathway is organelle specific and involves transport starting from methionine chain-elongation, sulfate transport, and ending with Gls storage in the seeds (Sønderby et al., 2010; Gigolashvili and Kopriva, 2014; Jørgensen et al., 2015). Here we report a decrease in ABC transporter B family member 19 (Lin and Wang, 2005) in both mutants (Table 1). In addition to their role in sulfate transport, ABC transporters are involved in transporting Gls hydrolysis products (Kang et al., 2011). This result indicates the decrease in glucosinolate levels in the mutants feedback regulate the ABC transporter level. In cyp79B2/B3, a curculin-like (mannose-binding) lectin family protein (At5g18470) involved in carbohydrate binding forms connections with MYB51 and CYP81F2 (Figures 2, 4). How this lectin family protein function is not known. Another biological process affected by the Gls perturbation is photosynthesis as revealed by the increase of photosystem I reaction center subunit IV B in both mutants (Table 1), and increases in cyp79B2/B3 photosystem II stability/assembly factor HCF136 (Meurer et al., 1998), protein curvature thylakoid 1B, NAD(P)H-quinone oxidoreductase subunit H, light-harvesting complex I chlorophyll a/b binding protein 1 and light-harvesting chlorophyll protein complex II subunit B1 (Table 2). The increased activity in the photosynthetic process could be a strategy to compensate for the internal stress in the mutants as indicated by changes of many stress-related proteins (Tables 2, 3; Mostafa et al., 2016). It was obvious that aliphatic Gls metabolism perturbation activated the ribosomal protein expression as reflected by the increased levels of 18 ribosomal proteins in the myb28/29 (Table 3). The biological implication of this change is not known although we can correlate it to the regulation of aliphatic Gls biosynthetic pathway by MYB28 and MYB29 (Li et al., 2013).

In both mutants, adenine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (APT1) acting on adenine phosphorylation (Allen et al., 2002) showed connections with GGP1 and SUR1, so it might have a role in thiohydroximate formation (Figures 24). Its decrease in levels may be a feedback of the decreased Gls production in the mutants. In cyp79B2/B3, FtsZ homolog 1 (FTSZ1) involved in chloroplast division and protein binding (Osteryoung et al., 1998) was found to connect with BCAT3 and GSTF9, suggesting it may affect methionine chain-elongation and thiohydroximate synthesis. Interestingly, another FtsZ homolog 2-2 (FTSZ2-2; McAndrew et al., 2008) was also connected with GSTF9 (Figures 2, 4). Isoform 3 of dihydrolipoyllysine-residue succinyltransferase component of 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex 2 (At4g26910) is a member of tricarboxylic acid cycle and can affect methionine biosynthesis and its coupling to acetylCoA in the chain elongation process. Interestingly, it was found to form multiple connections with GMN via BAT5, BCAT3, IMD1, IMD2, IMD3, GSTF9, and SUR1 (Figures 2, 4). In addition, ATP sulfurylase 1 (APS1), a hydrogen sulfide biosynthesis enzyme, formed edges with GGP1 and SUR1, suggesting its potential role in thiohydroximate synthesis (Figures 2, 4). The increased levels of the aforementioned proteins may reflect a feedback mechanism to compensate for reduced Gls levels in the cyp79B2/B3. Flavone 3'-O-methyltransferase 1 (OMT1) in flavonoid metabolism (Muzac et al., 2000) was connected with FMO1, so it could participate in sulfinyl Gls formation (Figures 2, 4). This finding provides another line of evidence for the pathway interaction between phenylpropanoids and glucosinolates. Previously, methionine derived aldoximes were shown to directly or indirectly inhibit caffeic acid O-methyltransferase (COMT) and caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase CCoAOMT), leading to low levels of phenylpropanoid metabolites (Hemm et al., 2003). Here the decreased levels of OMT1 in cyp79B2/B3 may contribute to the decreased production of sulfinyl Gls in the mutant. The data support our metabolomics finding concerning the decreased shikimate level (Mostafa et al., 2016). Another possibility of the OMT1 activity is methylation of hydroxy-indolyl Gls to form methylated indolic Gls (unknown before, Sønderby et al., 2010) in a way similar to methylation of quercetin into isorhamnetin (Figure 5). In myb28/29, 60S ribosomal proteins L13-1 (BBC1) and L15-1 (RPL15A) might be a component in thiohydroximate synthesis through the connections with GSTF9, GSTF10 and/or GSTF11. Both proteins were increased, presumably to compensate for the deficiency of aliphatic Gls in the mutant (Mostafa et al., 2016).

The proteome and transcriptome correlation

In the cyp79B2/B3, the defense and stress-related genes calreticulin 3 (At1g08450; Sun et al., 2014), calmodulin (At2g41100; Cazzonelli et al., 2014), lectin (At5g03350; Armijo et al., 2013), and SNAP25 (At5g61210; Eschen-Lippold et al., 2012) showed significant upregulation in the transcriptome and increases in the proteome. Malate dehydrogenase 2 expression was decreased at both the transcript and protein levels, and it is known to be involved in bacterial defense (Jones et al., 2006). These data have provided additional evidence for the relationship between indolic glucosinolates and stress responses. The overall positive correlation between protein and gene expression levels in the cyp79B2/B3 indicates transcriptional regulation of indole glucosinolates. In myb28/29, although there was no overall correlation between transcript and protein levels, isoform 2 of LysM (At1g21880; Willmann et al., 2011) and AIG2 (avirulence induced gene, At5g39730) exhibited similar downregulation patterns as their corresponding proteins. Both genes are involved in cellular stress responses (Jiang et al., 2007; Willmann et al., 2011). Post-transcriptional and post-translational regulations may contribute to the non-correlation between the expression of some of the genes and their encoded proteins in myb28/29.

Conclusions

Glucosinolate biosynthetic process is controlled by several cytochrome proteins known to be localized to the membrane, but little is known about how Gls metabolism would affect the membrane proteome. In this study, we aim to address this important question utilizing the TMT labeling based quantitative proteomics of two genetic mutants, i.e., cyp79B2/B3 as the indolic Gls mutant and myb28/29 as the aliphatic Gls mutant. We identified 4,673 proteins, out of which 2,171 were membrane proteins. From these membrane proteins and after transmembrane domain analysis, 192 exhibited different levels relative to WT, with cytochrome P450 86A7, cytochrome P450 71B26 and probable cytochrome c representing new cytochromes potentially involved in GMN. Based on our analyses, the first two might play a role in hydroxyl-indolic Gls production. In addition, a flavone 3′-O-methyltransferase 1 is hypothesized to participate in the methylation process of the hydroxyl-indolic Gls to form methoxy-indolic Gls. GO functional enrichment revealed important processes related to stress response, transport activities and photosynthesis in the cyp79B2/B3 and those related to protein translation in the myb28/29. A transcription profiling of both mutants showed a strong correlation between transcript and protein levels in cyp79B2/B3, and no significant correlation in myb28/29. Overall, the new nodes and edges discovered in the GMNs are useful resources for future hypothesis-testing experiments and ultimately toward engineering and breeding of Gls profiles with positive impacts on human health and plant defense.

Statements

Author contributions

IM performed the experiments, data analysis and paper drafting; MY performed qRT-PCR experiment and data analysis; NZ participated in protein extraction and peptides labeling; SG conducted the statistical analysis; CD contributed in LC/MS analysis of peptides; MA and ME provided supervision and advice, and SC designed the experiments, supervised the work and finalized the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Chen laboratory members for their support and co-operation. The US National Science Foundation (NSF CAREER 0845162), University of Florida, and the Egyptian Government represented by the Egyptian Cultural and Educational Bureau at Washington DC are acknowledged for funding this project.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer XH and handling Editor declared their shared affiliation, and the handling Editor states that the process nevertheless met the standards of a fair and objective review.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.00534/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1

Biological process GO enrichment of membrane proteins differentially expressed in cyp79B2/B3 compared to WT.

Supplementary Figure 2

Cellular component GO enrichment of membrane proteins differentially expressed in cyp79B2/B3 compared to WT.

Supplementary Figure 3

Molecular function GO enrichment of membrane proteins differentially expressed in cyp79B2/B3 compared to WT.

Supplementary Figure 4

Biological process GO enrichment of membrane proteins differentially expressed in myb28/29 compared to WT.

Supplementary Figure 5

Cellular component GO enrichment of membrane proteins differentially expressed in myb28/29 compared to WT.

Supplementary Figure 6

Molecular function GO enrichment of membrane proteins differentially expressed in myb28/29 compared to WT.

Supplementary Figure 7

Correlation between transcript and protein levels inferred from 32 to 22 genes for cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29, respectively. Pearson correlation r = 0.6579 (p = 4.269e−05) for cyp79B2/B3 and r = 0.0887 (p = 0.6945) for myb28/29.

Supplementary Table 1

Primer information used in qRT-PCR.

Supplementary Table 2

Proteomics data from two independent experiments (the data were generated using Proteome Discoverer 1.4 by searching the raw data against the Arabidopsis tair 10 database).

Supplementary Table 3

Transmembrane domains predection analyses.

Supplementary Table 4

GO enrichment of proteins differentially expressed in cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29 mutants relative to WT using AgriGO SEACOMPARE.

Supplementary Table 5

Gene expression at transcript and protein levels in cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29 relative to WT.

    Abbreviations

  • Gls

    glucosinolate

  • GMN

    glucosinolate molecular network

  • GO

    Gene Ontology

  • TMT

    tandem mass tags

  • WT

    Arabidopsis thaliana wild type.

References

  • 1

    AbeH.ObinataT.MinamideL. S.BamburgJ. R. (1996). Xenopus laevis actin-depolymerizing factor/cofilin: a phosphorylation-regulated protein essential for development. J. Cell Biol.132, 871885. 10.1083/jcb.132.5.871

  • 2

    Agudelo-RomeroP.CarbonellP.De La IglesiaF.CarreraJ.RodrigoG.JaramilloA.et al. (2008). Changes in the gene expression profile of Arabidopsis thaliana after infection with Tobacco etch virus. Virol. J.5, 1. 10.1186/1743-422X-5-92

  • 3

    AlexanderssonE.DanielsonJ. A.RådeJ.MoparthiV. K.FontesM.KjellbomP.et al. (2010). Transcriptional regulation of aquaporins in accessions of Arabidopsis in response to drought stress. Plant J.61, 650660. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04087.x

  • 4

    AlexanderssonE.FraysseL.Sjövall-LarsenS.GustavssonS.FellertM.KarlssonM.et al. (2005). Whole gene family expression and drought stress regulation of aquaporins. Plant Mol. Biol.59, 469484. 10.1007/s11103-005-0352-1

  • 5

    AllenM.QinW.MoreauF.MoffattB. (2002). Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase isoforms of Arabidopsis and their potential contributions to adenine and cytokinin metabolism. Physiol. Plant.115, 5668. 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1150106.x

  • 6

    AntignaniV.KlockoA. L.BakG.ChandrasekaranS. D.DunivinT.NielsenE. (2015). Recruitment of plant U-BOX13 and the PI4Kβ1/β2 phosphatidylinositol-4 kinases by the small GTPase RabA4B plays important roles during salicylic acid-mediated plant defense signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell27, 243261. 10.1105/tpc.114.134262

  • 7

    ArmijoG.SalinasP.MonteolivaM. I.SeguelA.GarcíaC.Villarroel-CandiaE.et al. (2013). A salicylic acid-induced lectin-like protein plays a positive role in the effector-triggered immunity response of Arabidopsis thaliana to Pseudomonas syringae Avr-Rpm1. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.26, 13951406. 10.1094/MPMI-02-13-0044-R

  • 8

    Ascencio-IbáñezJ. T.SozzaniR.LeeT. J.ChuT. M.WolfingerR. D.CellaR.et al. (2008). Global analysis of Arabidopsis gene expression uncovers a complex array of changes impacting pathogen response and cell cycle during geminivirus infection. Plant Physiol.148, 436454. 10.1104/pp.108.121038

  • 9

    AxtellM. J.StaskawiczB. J. (2003). Initiation of RPS2-specified disease resistance in Arabidopsis is coupled to the AvrRpt2-directed elimination of RIN4. Cell112, 369377. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00036-9

  • 10

    AzimzadehJ.NacryP.ChristodoulidouA.DrevensekS.CamilleriC.AmiourN.et al. (2008). Arabidopsis TONNEAU1 proteins are essential for preprophase band formation and interact with centrin. Plant Cell20, 21462159. 10.1105/tpc.107.056812

  • 11

    BaldrianováJ.ČernýM.NovákJ.JedelskýP. L.DivíškováE.BrzobohatýB. (2015). Arabidopsis proteome responses to the smoke-derived growth regulator karrikin. J. Proteomics120, 720. 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.02.011

  • 12

    BedhommeM.HoffmannM.McCarthyE. A.GambonnetB.MoranR. G.RébeilléF.et al. (2005). Folate metabolism in plants: an Arabidopsis homolog of the mammalian mitochondrial folate transporter mediates folate import into chloroplasts. J. Biol. Chem.280, 3482334831. 10.1074/jbc.M506045200

  • 13

    BessireM.BorelS.FabreG.CarraçaL.EfremovaN.YephremovA.et al. (2011). A member of the pleiotropic drug resistance family of ATP binding cassette transporters is required for the formation of a functional cuticle in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell23, 19581970. 10.1105/tpc.111.083121

  • 14

    BirchmeierW.KohlerC. E.SchatzG. (1976). Interaction of integral and peripheral membrane proteins: affinity labeling of yeast cytochrome oxidase by modified yeast cytochrome c. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.73, 43344338. 10.1073/pnas.73.12.4334

  • 15

    CampbellP.BraamJ. (1999). In vitro activities of four xyloglucan endotransglycosylases from Arabidopsis. Plant J.18, 371382. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00459.x

  • 16

    CazzonelliC. I.NisarN.RobertsA. C.MurrayK. D.BorevitzJ. O.PogsonB. J. (2014). A chromatin modifying enzyme, SDG8, is involved in morphological, gene expression, and epigenetic responses to mechanical stimulation. Front. Plant Sci.5:533. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00533

  • 17

    ChenJ.BangW. Y.LeeY.KimS.LeeK. W.KimS. W.et al. (2014). AtObgC-AtRSH1 interaction may play a vital role in stress response signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem.74, 176184. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.10.022

  • 18

    ChenY.YanX.ChenS. (2011). Bioinformatic analysis of molecular network of glucosinolate biosynthesis. Comput. Biol. Chem.35, 1018. 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2010.12.002

  • 19

    ChenY. Z.PangQ. Y.HeY.ZhuN.BranstromI.YanX. F.et al. (2012). Proteomics and metabolomics of Arabidopsis responses to perturbation of glucosinolate biosynthesis. Mol. Plant5, 11381150. 10.1093/mp/sss034

  • 20

    ClayN. K.AdioA. M.DenouxC.JanderG.AusubelF. M. (2009). Glucosinolate metabolites required for an Arabidopsis innate immune response. Science323, 95101. 10.1126/science.1164627

  • 21

    CzégényG.WuM.DérA.ErikssonL. A.StridÅ.HidegÉ. (2014). Hydrogen peroxide contributes to the ultraviolet-B (280–315nm) induced oxidative stress of plant leaves through multiple pathways. FEBS Lett.588, 22552261. 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.05.005

  • 22

    DaiN.WangW.PattersonS. E.BleeckerA. B. (2013). The TMK subfamily of receptor-like kinases in Arabidopsis display an essential role in growth and a reduced sensitivity to auxin. PLoS ONE8:e60990. 10.1371/journal.pone.0060990

  • 23

    DanielsM. J.MirkovT. E.ChrispeelsM. J. (1994). The plasma membrane of Arabidopsis thaliana contains a mercury-insensitive aquaporin that is a homolog of the tonoplast water channel protein TIP. Plant Physiol.106, 13251333. 10.1104/pp.106.4.1325

  • 24

    DesveauxD.MaréchalA.BrissonN. (2005). Whirly transcription factors: defense gene regulation and beyond. Trends Plant Sci.10, 95102. 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.12.008

  • 25

    DuanH.SchulerM. A. (2005). Differential expression and evolution of the Arabidopsis CYP86A subfamily. Plant Physiol.137, 10671081. 10.1104/pp.104.055715

  • 26

    EdstamM. M.EdqvistJ. (2014). Involvement of GPI-anchored lipid transfer proteins in the development of seed coats and pollen in Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Plant.152, 3242. 10.1111/ppl.12156

  • 27

    Eschen-LippoldL.LandgrafR.SmolkaU.SchulzeS.HeilmannM.HeilmannI.et al. (2012). Activation of defense against Phytophthora infestans in potato by down-regulation of syntaxin gene expression. New Phytol.193, 985996. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04024.x

  • 28

    FengJ.LiJ.GaoZ.LuY.YuJ.ZhengQ.et al. (2015). SKIP confers osmotic tolerance during salt stress by controlling alternative gene splicing in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant8, 10381052. 10.1016/j.molp.2015.01.011

  • 29

    FrerigmannH.BöttcherC.BaatoutD.GigolashviliT. (2012). Glucosinolates are produced in trichomes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci.3:242. 10.3389/fpls.2012.00242

  • 30

    FrisoG.GiacomelliL.YtterbergA. J.PeltierJ. B.RudellaA.SunQ.et al. (2004). In-depth analysis of the thylakoid membrane proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts: new proteins, new functions, and a plastid proteome database. Plant Cell16, 478499. 10.1105/tpc.017814

  • 31

    Garcia-MolinaA.Andrés-ColásN.Perea-GarcíaA.NeumannU.DodaniS. C.HuijserP.et al. (2013). The Arabidopsis COPT6 transport protein functions in copper distribution under copper-deficient conditions. Plant Cell Physiol.54, 13781390. 10.1093/pcp/pct088

  • 32

    GhelisT.BolbachG.ClodicG.HabricotY.MiginiacE.SottaB.et al. (2008). Protein tyrosine kinases and protein tyrosine phosphatases are involved in ABA-dependent processes in Arabidopsis thaliana seeds and suspension cells. Plant Physiol.148, 16681680. 10.1104/pp.108.124594

  • 33

    GigolashviliT.KoprivaS. (2014). Transporters in plant sulfur metabolism. Front. Plant Sci.7:442. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00442

  • 34

    GoreckaK. M.Konopka-PostupolskaD.HennigJ.BuchetR.PikulaS. (2005). Peroxidase activity of annexin 1 from Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.336, 868875. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.181

  • 35

    GrubbC. D.AbelS. (2006). Glucosinolate metabolism and its control. Trends Plant Sci.11, 89100. 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.12.006

  • 36

    GuoL.DevaiahS. P.NarasimhanR.PanX.ZhangY.ZhangW.et al. (2012). Cytosolic glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenases interact with phospholipase Dδ to transduce hydrogen peroxide signals in the Arabidopsis response to stress. Plant Cell24, 22002212. 10.1105/tpc.111.094946

  • 37

    GuoR. F.YuanG. F.WangQ. M. (2013). Effect of NaCl treatments on glucosinolate metabolism in broccoli sprouts. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B14, 124131. 10.1631/jzus.B1200096

  • 38

    HalkierB. A.GershenzonJ. (2006). Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.57, 303333. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105228

  • 39

    HarperA. D.Bar-PeledM. (2002). Biosynthesis of UDP-xylose. Cloning and characterization of a novel Arabidopsis gene family, UXS, encoding soluble and putative membrane-bound UDP-glucuronic acid decarboxylase isoforms. Plant Physiol.130, 21882198. 10.1104/pp.009654

  • 40

    HemmM. R.RueggerM. O.ChappleC. (2003). The Arabidopsis ref2 mutant is defective in the gene encoding CYP83A1 and shows both phenylpropanoid and glucosinolate phenotypes. Plant Cell15, 179194. 10.1105/tpc.006544

  • 41

    IglesiasJ.TriguerosM.Rojas-TrianaM.FernándezM.AlbarJ. P.BustosR.et al. (2013). Proteomics identifies ubiquitin–proteasome targets and new roles for chromatin-remodeling in the Arabidopsis response to phosphate starvation. J. Proteomics94, 122. 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.08.015

  • 42

    JaillaisY.SantambrogioM.RozierF.Fobis-LoisyI.MiègeC.GaudeT. (2007). The retromer protein VPS29 links cell polarity and organ initiation in plants. Cell130, 10571070. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.040

  • 43

    JangJ. C.LeónP.ZhouL.SheenJ. (1997). Hexokinase as a sugar sensor in higher plants. Plant Cell9, 519. 10.1105/tpc.9.1.5

  • 44

    JavotH. (2003). Role of a single aquaporin isoform in root water uptake. Plant Cell Online15, 509522. 10.1105/tpc.008888

  • 45

    JelenskaJ.KangY.GreenbergJ. T. (2014). Plant pathogenic bacteria target the actin microfilament network involved in the trafficking of disease defense components. Bioarchitecture4, 149153. 10.4161/19490992.2014.980662

  • 46

    JiW.CongR.LiS.LiR.QinZ.LiY.et al. (2016). Comparative proteomic analysis of soybean leaves and roots by iTRAQ provides insights into response mechanisms to short-term salt stress. Front. Plant Sci.7:573. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00573

  • 47

    JiaF.WangC.HuangJ.YangG.WuC.ZhengC. (2015). SCF E3 ligase PP2-B11 plays a positive role in response to salt stress in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot.66, 46834697. 10.1093/jxb/erv245

  • 48

    JiaH.LiJ.ZhuJ.FanT.QianD.ZhouY.et al. (2013). Arabidopsis CROLIN1, a novel plant actin-binding protein, functions in cross-linking and stabilizing actin filaments. J. Biol. Chem.288, 3227732288. 10.1074/jbc.M113.483594

  • 49

    JiangY.YangB.HarrisN. S.DeyholosM. K. (2007). Comparative proteomic analysis of NaCl stress-responsive proteins in Arabidopsis roots. J. Exp. Bot.58, 35913607. 10.1093/jxb/erm207

  • 50

    JonesA. M.ThomasV.BennettM. H.MansfieldJ.GrantM. (2006). Modifications to the Arabidopsis defense proteome occur prior to significant transcriptional change in response to inoculation with Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Physiol.142, 16031620. 10.1104/pp.106.086231

  • 51

    JørgensenM. E.OlsenC. E.GeigerD.MirzaO.HalkierB. A.Nour-EldinH. H. (2015). A functional EXXEK motif is essential for proton coupling and active glucosinolate transport by NPF2.11. Plant Cell Physiol.56, 23402350. 10.1093/pcp/pcv145

  • 52

    JossierM.KroniewiczL.DalmasF.Le ThiecD.EphritikhineG.ThomineS.et al. (2010). The Arabidopsis vacuolar anion transporter, AtCLCc, is involved in the regulation of stomatal movements and contributes to salt tolerance. Plant J.64, 563576. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04352.x

  • 53

    KammerloherW.FischerU.PiechottkaG. P.SchäffnerA. R. (1994). Water channels in the plant plasma membrane cloned by immunoselection from a mammalian expression system. Plant J.6, 187199. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1994.6020187.x

  • 54

    KanaokaM. M.UrbanS.FreemanM.OkadaK. (2005). An Arabidopsis rhomboid homolog is an intramembrane protease in plants. FEBS Lett.579, 57235728. 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.09.049

  • 55

    KandasamyM. K.McKinneyE. C.MeagherR. B. (2002). Functional nonequivalency of actin isovariants in Arabidopsis. Mol. Biol. Cell13, 251261. 10.1091/mbc.01-07-0342

  • 56

    KangJ.ParkJ.ChoiH.BurlaB.KretzschmarT.LeeY.et al. (2011). Plant ABC transporters. Arabidopsis Book9:e0153. 10.1199/tab.0153

  • 57

    KawamuraY.UemuraM. (2003). Mass spectrometric approach for identifying putative plasma membrane proteins of Arabidopsis leaves associated with cold acclimation. Plant J.36, 141154. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01864.x

  • 58

    KhanM. A. M.UlrichsC.MewisI. (2010). Influence of water stress on the glucosinolate profile of Brassica oleracea var. italica and the performance of Brevicoryne brassicae and Myzus persicae. Entomol. Exp. Appl.137, 229236. 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2010.01059.x

  • 59

    KissenR.RossiterJ. T.BonesA. M. (2009). The ‘mustard oil bomb’: not so easy to assemble?! Localization, expression and distribution of the components of the myrosinase enzyme system. Phytochem. Rev.8, 6986. 10.1007/s11101-008-9109-1

  • 60

    KnopfR. R.AdamZ. (2012). Rhomboid proteases in plants–still in square one?Physiol. Plant.145, 4151. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01532.x

  • 61

    KohJ.ChenS.ZhuN.YuF.SoltisP. S.SoltisD. E. (2012). Comparative proteomics of the recently and recurrently formed natural allopolyploid Tragopogon mirus (Asteraceae) and its parents. New Phytol.196, 292−305. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04251.x

  • 62

    LawA. H.ChowC. M.JiangL. (2012). Secretory carrier membrane proteins. Protoplasma249, 269283. 10.1007/s00709-011-0295-0

  • 63

    LeeS.LeeD. W.LeeY.MayerU.StierhofY. D.LeeS.et al. (2009). Heat shock protein cognate 70-4 and an E3 ubiquitin ligase, CHIP, mediate plastid-destined precursor degradation through the ubiquitin-26S proteasome system in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell21, 39844001. 10.1105/tpc.109.071548

  • 64

    LiC. L.WangM.MaX. Y.ZhangW. (2014). NRGA1, a putative mitochondrial pyruvate carrier, mediates ABA regulation of guard cell ion channels and drought stress responses in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant7, 15081521. 10.1093/mp/ssu061

  • 65

    LiL.WangH.GagoJ.CuiH.QianZ.KodamaN.et al. (2015). Harpin Hpa1 interacts with aquaporin PIP1; 4 to promote the substrate transport and photosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep.5:17207. 10.1038/srep17207

  • 66

    LiY.SawadaY.HiraiA.SatoM.KuwaharaA.YanX.et al. (2013). Novel insights into the function of Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB transcription factors regulating aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol.54, 13351344. 10.1093/pcp/pct085

  • 67

    LimT. K.LeK. P. U.LinQ.NguyenT. T. H. (2017). iTRAQ-based proteome analysis of fluoroquinolone-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist.8, 8289. 10.1016/j.jgar.2016.11.003

  • 68

    LinR.WangH. (2005). Two homologous ATP-binding cassette transporter proteins, AtMDR1 and AtPGP1, regulate Arabidopsis photomorphogenesis and root development by mediating polar auxin transport. Plant Physiol.138, 949964. 10.1104/pp.105.061572

  • 69

    LisenbeeC. S.LingardM. J.TreleaseR. N. (2005). Arabidopsis peroxisomes possess functionally redundant membrane and matrix isoforms of monodehydroascorbate reductase. Plant J.43, 900914. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02503.x

  • 70

    MannJ. (1987). Secondary Metabolism, Vol. 2. Oxford; New York, NY: Clarendon Press.

  • 71

    MarmagneA.BrabantP.ThiellementH.AlixK. (2010). Analysis of gene expression in resynthesized Brassica napus allotetraploids: transcriptional changes do not explain differential protein regulation. New Phytol.186, 216227. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03139.x

  • 72

    Martínez-BallestaM. D.-C.MorenoD. A.CarvajalM. (2013). The physiological importance of glucosinolates on plant response to abiotic stress in Brassica. Int. J. Mol. Sci.14, 1160711625. 10.3390/ijms140611607

  • 73

    McAndrewR. S.OlsonB. J.Kadirjan-KalbachD. K.Chi-HamC. L.VithaS.FroehlichJ. E.et al. (2008). In vivo quantitative relationship between plastid division proteins FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 and identification of ARC6 and ARC3 in a native FtsZ complex. Biochem. J.412, 367378. 10.1042/BJ20071354

  • 74

    McDowellJ. M.AnY. Q.HuangS.McKinneyE. C.MeagherR. B. (1996). The Arabidopsis ACT7 actin gene is expressed in rapidly developing tissues and responds to several external stimuli. Plant Physiol.111, 699711. 10.1104/pp.111.3.699

  • 75

    MeurerJ.PlückenH.KowallikK. V.WesthoffP. (1998). A nuclear-encoded protein of prokaryotic origin is essential for the stability of photosystem II in Arabidopsis thaliana. EMBO J.17, 52865297. 10.1093/emboj/17.18.5286

  • 76

    MichaleckaA. M.SvenssonA. S.JohanssonF. I.AgiusS. C.JohansonU.BrennickeA.et al. (2003). Arabidopsis genes encoding mitochondrial type II NAD(P)H dehydrogenases have different evolutionary origin and show distinct responses to light. Plant Physiol.133, 642652. 10.1104/pp.103.024208

  • 77

    MinamiA.TominagaY.FurutoA.KondoM.KawamuraY.UemuraM. (2015). Arabidopsis dynamin-related protein 1E in sphingolipid-enriched plasma membrane domains is associated with the development of freezing tolerance. Plant J.83, 501514. 10.1111/tpj.12907

  • 78

    MonaghanJ.LiX. (2010). The heat repeat protein ILITYHIA is required for plant immunity. Plant Cell Physiol.51, 742753. 10.1093/pcp/pcq038

  • 79

    MostafaI.ZhuN.YooM. J.BalmantK. M.MisraB. B.DufresneC.et al. (2016). New nodes and edges in the glucosinolate molecular network revealed by proteomics and metabolomics of Arabidopsis myb28/29 and cyp79B2/B3 glucosinolate mutants. J. Proteomics138, 119. 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.02.012

  • 80

    MukherjeeA. K.CarpM. J.ZuchmanR.ZivT.HorwitzB. A.GepsteinS. (2010). Proteomics of the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to infection with Alternaria brassicicola. J. Proteomics73, 709720. 10.1016/j.jprot.2009.10.005

  • 81

    MurakamiR.IfukuK.TakabayashiA.ShikanaiT.EndoT.SatoF. (2002). Characterization of an Arabidopsis thaliana mutant with impaired psbO, one of two genes encoding extrinsic 33-kDa proteins in photosystem II. FEBS Lett.523, 138142. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02963-0

  • 82

    MurrayJ.ZhangB.TaylorS. W.OglesbeeD.FahyE.MarusichM. F.et al. (2003). The subunit composition of the human NADH dehydrogenase obtained by rapid one-step immunopurification. J. Biol. Chem.278, 1361913622. 10.1074/jbc.C300064200

  • 83

    MustrophA.SonnewaldU.BiemeltS. (2007). Characterisation of the ATP-dependent phosphofructokinase gene family from Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett.581, 24012410. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.04.060

  • 84

    MuzacI.WangJ.AnzellottiD.ZhangH.IbrahimR. K. (2000). Functional expression of an Arabidopsis cDNA clone encoding a flavonol 3'-O-methyltransferase and characterization of the gene product. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.375, 385388. 10.1006/abbi.1999.1681

  • 85

    NafisiM.GoregaokerS.BotangaC. J.GlawischnigE.OlsenC. E.HalkierB. A.et al. (2007). Arabidopsis cytochrome P450 monooxygenase 71A13 catalyzes the conversion of indole-3-acetaldoxime in camalexin synthesis. Plant Cell19, 20392052. 10.1105/tpc.107.051383

  • 86

    NarendraS.VenkataramaniS.ShenG.WangJ.PasapulaV.LinY.et al. (2006). The Arabidopsis ascorbate peroxidase 3 is a peroxisomal membrane-bound antioxidant enzyme and is dispensable for Arabidopsis growth and development. J. Exp. Bot.57, 30333042. 10.1093/jxb/erl060

  • 87

    NeveE. P.Ingelman-SundbergM. (2010). Cytochrome P450 proteins: retention and distribution from the endoplasmic reticulum. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev.13, 7885.

  • 88

    NielsenM. E.Thordal-ChristensenH. (2012). Recycling of Arabidopsis plasma membrane PEN1 syntaxin. Plant Signal. Behav.7, 15411543. 10.4161/psb.22304

  • 89

    NoëlL. D.CagnaG.StuttmannJ.WirthmüllerL.BetsuyakuS.WitteC.-P.et al. (2007). Interaction between SGT1 and cytosolic/nuclear HSC70 chaperones regulates Arabidopsis immune responses. Plant Cell19, 40614076. 10.1105/tpc.107.051896

  • 90

    OkamotoM.VidmarJ. J.GlassA. D. (2003). Regulation of NRT1 and NRT2 gene families of Arabidopsis thaliana: responses to nitrate provision. Plant Cell Physiol.44, 304317. 10.1093/pcp/pcg036

  • 91

    OsteryoungK. W.StokesK. D.RutherfordS. M.PercivalA. L.LeeW. Y. (1998). Chloroplast division in higher plants requires members of two functionally divergent gene families with homology to bacterial ftsZ. Plant Cell10, 19912004. 10.2307/3870779

  • 92

    PalmbladM.MillsD. J.BindschedlerL. V. (2008). Heat-shock response in Arabidopsis thaliana explored by multiplexed quantitative proteomics using differential metabolic labeling. J. Proteome Res.7, 780785. 10.1021/pr0705340

  • 93

    PangQ.ChenS.DaiS.ChenY.WangY.YanX. (2010). Comparative proteomics of salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella halophila. J. Proteome Res.9, 25842599. 10.1021/pr100034f

  • 94

    PatelS. (2004). Arabidopsis WPP-domain proteins are developmentally associated with the nuclear envelope and promote cell division. Plant Cell Online16, 32603273. 10.1105/tpc.104.026740

  • 95

    PengL.MaJ.ChiW.GuoJ.ZhuS.LuQ.et al. (2006). Low PSII accumulation1 is involved in efficient assembly of photosystem II in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell18, 955969. 10.1105/tpc.105.037689

  • 96

    PesaresiP.ScharfenbergM.WeigelM.GranlundI.SchröderW. P.FinazziG.et al. (2009). Mutants, overexpressors, and interactors of Arabidopsis plastocyanin isoforms: revised roles of plastocyanin in photosynthetic electron flow and thylakoid redox state. Mol. Plant2, 236248. 10.1093/mp/ssn041

  • 97

    PicaultN.PalmieriL.PisanoI.HodgesM.PalmieriF. (2002). Identification of a novel transporter for dicarboxylates and tricarboxylates in plant mitochondria bacterial expression, reconstitution, functional characterization, and tissue distribution. J. Biol. Chem.277, 2420424211. 10.1074/jbc.M202702200

  • 98

    QuirinoB. F.ReiterW. D.AmasinoR. D. (2001). One of two tandem Arabidopsis genes homologous to monosaccharide transporters is senescence-associated. Plant Mol. Biol.46, 447457. 10.1023/A:1010639015959

  • 99

    RaiA. N.TamirisaS.RaoK. V.KumarV.SuprasannaP. (2016). Brassica RNA binding protein ERD4 is involved in conferring salt, drought tolerance and enhancing plant growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol.90, 375387. 10.1007/s11103-015-0423-x

  • 100

    Rama DeviS.ChenX.OliverD. J.XiangC. (2006). A novel high-throughput genetic screen for stress-responsive mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana reveals new loci involving stress responses. Plant J.47, 652663. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02814.x

  • 101

    RamónN. M.BartelB. (2010). Interdependence of the peroxisome-targeting receptors in Arabidopsis thaliana: PEX7 facilitates PEX5 accumulation and import of PTS1 cargo into peroxisomes. Mol. Biol. Cell21, 12631271. 10.1091/mbc.E09-08-0672

  • 102

    RenX. L.QiG. N.FengH. Q.ZhaoS.ZhaoS. S.WangY.et al. (2013). Calcineurin B-like protein CBL10 directly interacts with AKT1 and modulates K+ homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant J.74, 258266. 10.1111/tpj.12123

  • 103

    SakamotoW.TamuraT.Hanba-TomitaY.MurataM. (2002). The VAR1 locus of Arabidopsis encodes a chloroplastic FtsH and is responsible for leaf variegation in the mutant alleles. Genes Cells7, 769780. 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2002.00558.x

  • 104

    ShiH.ShenQ.QiY.YanH.NieH.ChenY.et al. (2013). BR-signaling kinase1 physically associates with flagellin sensing2 and regulates plant innate immunity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell25, 11431157. 10.1105/tpc.112.107904

  • 105

    ShirakawaM.UedaH.ShimadaT.Hara-NishimuraI. (2016). FAMA: a molecular link between stomata and myrosin cells. Trends Plant Sci.21, 861871. 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.07.003

  • 106

    Silva-SanchezC.ChenS.ZhuN.LiQ. B.ChoureyP. S. (2013). Proteomic comparison of basal endosperm in maize miniature1 mutant and its wild-type Mn1. Front. Plant Sci.4:211. 10.3389/fpls.2013.00211

  • 107

    SokolenkoA.PojidaevaE.ZinchenkoV.PanichkinV.GlaserV. M.HerrmannR. G.et al. (2002). The gene complement for proteolysis in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts. Curr. Genet.41, 291310. 10.1007/s00294-002-0309-8

  • 108

    SønderbyI. E.Geu-FloresF.HalkierB. A. (2010). Biosynthesis of glucosinolates - gene discovery and beyond. Trends Plant Sci.15, 283290. 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.02.005

  • 109

    SunL.XuD.XuQ.SunJ.XingL.ZhangL.et al. (2017). iTRAQ reveals proteomic changes during intestine regeneration in the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D.22, 3949. 10.1016/j.cbd.2017.02.004

  • 110

    SunT.ZhangQ.GaoM.ZhangY. (2014). Regulation of SOBIR1 accumulation and activation of defense responses in bir1–1 by specific components of ER quality control. Plant J.77, 748756. 10.1111/tpj.12425

  • 111

    SweetloveL. J.HeazlewoodJ. L.HeraldV.HoltzapffelR.DayD. A.LeaverC. J.et al. (2002). The impact of oxidative stress on Arabidopsis mitochondria. Plant J.32, 891904. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01474.x

  • 112

    SzumlanskiA. L.NielsenE. (2009). The Rab GTPase RabA4d regulates pollen tube tip growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell21, 526544. 10.1105/tpc.108.060277

  • 113

    TakáčT.ŠamajováO.VadovičP.PechanT.KošútováP.OvečkaM.et al. (2014). Proteomic and biochemical analyses show a functional network of proteins involved in antioxidant defense of the Arabidopsis anp2anp3 double mutant. J. Proteome Res.13, 53475361. 10.1021/pr500588c

  • 114

    ThompsonE. P.SmithS. G.GloverB. J. (2012). An Arabidopsis rhomboid protease has roles in the chloroplast and in flower development. J. Exp. Bot.63, 35593570. 10.1093/jxb/ers012

  • 115

    Tournaire-RouxC.SutkaM.JavotH.GoutE.GerbeauP.LuuD. T.et al. (2003). Cytosolic pH regulates root water transport during anoxic stress through gating of aquaporins. Nature425, 393397. 10.1038/nature01853

  • 116

    VoxeurA.AndréA.BretonC.LerougeP. (2012). Identification of putative rhamnogalacturonan-II specific glycosyltransferases in Arabidopsis using a combination of bioinformatics approaches. PLoS ONE7:e51129. 10.1371/journal.pone.0051129

  • 117

    WalterB.PietaT.SchünemannD. (2015). Arabidopsis thaliana mutants lacking cpFtsY or cpSRP54 exhibit different defects in photosystem II repair. Front. Plant Sci.6:250. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00250

  • 118

    WeigA.DeswarteC.ChrispeelsM. J. (1997). The major intrinsic protein family of Arabidopsis has 23 members that form three distinct groups with functional aquaporins in each group. Plant Physiol.114, 13471357. 10.1104/pp.114.4.1347

  • 119

    WelchenE.HildebrandtT. M.LewejohannD.GonzalezD. H.BraunH. P. (2012). Lack of cytochrome c in Arabidopsis decreases stability of Complex IV and modifies redox metabolism without affecting Complexes I and III. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1817, 9901001. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.04.008

  • 120

    WillmannR.LajunenH. M.ErbsG.NewmanM.KolbD.TsudaK. (2011). Mediate bacterial peptidoglycan sensing and immunity to bacterial infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.108, 1982419829. 10.1073/pnas.1112862108

  • 121

    WintzH.FoxT.WuY. Y.FengV.ChenW.ChangH. S.et al. (2003). Expression profiles of Arabidopsis thaliana in mineral deficiencies reveal novel transporters involved in metal homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem.278, 4764447653. 10.1074/jbc.M309338200

  • 122

    XiaC.WangY. J.LiW. Q.ChenY. R.DengY.ZhangX. Q.et al. (2010). The Arabidopsis eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit F (AteIF3f), is required for pollen germination and embryogenesis. Plant J.63, 189202. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04237.x

  • 123

    YanX.ChenS. (2007). Regulation of plant glucosinolate metabolism. Planta226, 13431352. 10.1007/s00425-007-0627-7

  • 124

    YangS.ZengX.LiT.LiuM.ZhangS.GaoS.et al. (2012). AtACDO1, an ABC1-like kinase gene, is involved in chlorophyll degradation and the response to photooxidative stress in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot.63, 39593973. 10.1093/jxb/ers072

  • 125

    YangX. H.XuZ. H.XueH. W. (2005). Arabidopsis membrane steroid binding protein 1 is involved in inhibition of cell elongation. Plant Cell17, 116131. 10.1105/tpc.104.028381

  • 126

    ZelaznyE.SantambrogioM.PourcherM.ChambrierP.Berne-DedieuA.Fobis-LoisyI.et al. (2013). Mechanisms governing the endosomal membrane recruitment of the core retromer in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem288, 88158825. 10.1074/jbc.M112.440503

  • 127

    ZhangM.WangC.LinQ.LiuA.WangT.FengX.et al. (2015). A tetratricopeptide repeat domain-containing protein SSR1 located in mitochondria is involved in root development and auxin polar transport in Arabidopsis. Plant J.83, 582599. 10.1111/tpj.12911

  • 128

    ZhaoY.HullA. K.GuptaN. R.GossK. A.AlonsoJ.EckerJ. R.et al. (2002). Trp-dependent auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis: involvement of cytochrome P450s CYP79B2 and CYP79B3. Genes Dev.16, 31003112. 10.1101/gad.1035402

  • 129

    ZhengH.BasshamD. C.da Silva ConceiçãoA.RaikhelN. V. (1999). The syntaxin family of proteins in Arabidopsis : a new syntaxin homologue shows polymorphism between two ecotypes. J. Exp. Bot.50, 915924. 10.1093/jxb/50.Special_Issue.915

  • 130

    ZrennerR.RieglerH.MarquardC. R.LangeP. R.GeserickC.BartoszC. E.et al. (2009). A functional analysis of the pyrimidine catabolic pathway in Arabidopsis. New Phytol.183, 117132. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02843.x

Summary

Keywords

Arabidopsis, membrane proteome, glucosinolate, stress and defense, molecular networks

Citation

Mostafa I, Yoo M-J, Zhu N, Geng S, Dufresne C, Abou-Hashem M, El-Domiaty M and Chen S (2017) Membrane Proteomics of Arabidopsis Glucosinolate Mutants cyp79B2/B3 and myb28/29. Front. Plant Sci. 8:534. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00534

Received

02 February 2017

Accepted

24 March 2017

Published

11 April 2017

Volume

8 - 2017

Edited by

Wei Wang, Henan Agricultural University, China

Reviewed by

Xiuli Hu, Henan Agricultural University, China; Omar Pantoja, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Sixue Chen

This article was submitted to Plant Proteomics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics