Error in Figure/Table
In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 4 and Supplementary Table S2 as published. There was an error during the FPCs quantification process, whereby the ratio of injection volume between sample and standard was accidentally inverted. This error has resulted in the overestimation of FPCs concentration reported, but does not alter the biological significance of the results. The corrected Figure 4 appears below, and Supplementary Table S2 has been replaced in the original article.
Furthermore, in the original article, there was an error in the results section where the number of total FPCs for different tissues of two species are cited.
A correction has been made to the Results section, sub-section Detection and Quantification of FPCs, paragraph four:
“From all species analyzed, E. camphora and E. globulus had the highest concentration of total FPCs in leaves, with 65 and 41mg g−1 DW, respectively (Figure 4, Supplementary Table S2). Eucalyptus camphora also had high concentration of FPCs in flower buds and flowers, with 13 and 12mg g−1 DW, respectively. Interestingly, three Eucalyptus species showed a tendency to accumulate more FPCs in flowers compared to the leaves. Eucalyptus leucoxylon, E. sideroxylon, and E. viminalis contained ~40, 5, and 3 times more total FPCs in the flowers compared to leaves, respectively Figure 4, Supplementary Table S2. Eucalyptus yarraensis presented very low amounts of FPCs in leaves and flower buds, and it is the only species that does not contain any sideroxylonals. Eucalyptus cladocalyx and C. ficifolia did not show any traces of this class of specialized metabolites in the tissues analyzed.”
Figure 4
In addition, there was an error in the discussion where the number of total FPCs concentration is cited again.
A correction has been made to the Discussion section, sub-section Qualitative and Quantitative FPCs Variation in Eucalyptus, paragraph three:
“Eucalyptus camphora and E. globulus presented high concentrations of total FPCs in expanded leaves, with 65 and 41 mg g−1 DW, respectively. These concentrations are in a similar range to previous reports. For example, the concentration of sideroxylonals have been reported to reach up to 52 mg g−1 DW in E. melliodora (Wallis et al., 2002) and up to 100 mg g−1 DW in E. loxophleba ssp. lissophloia (Wallis and Foley, 2005).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.01052/full#supplementary-material
References
1
WallisI. R.FoleyW. J. (2005). The rapid determination of sideroxylonals in Eucalyptus foliage by extraction with sonication followed by HPLC. Phytochem. Anal.16, 49–54. doi: 10.1002/pca.810
2
WallisI. R.WatsonM. L.FoleyW. J. (2002). Secondary metabolites in Eucalyptus melliodora: Field distribution and laboratory feeding choices by a generalist herbivore, the common brushtail possum. Aust. J. Zool.50, 507–519. doi: 10.1071/ZO02029
Summary
Keywords
Corymbia, Eucalyptus, formylated phloroglucinol compounds, macrocarpal, MALDI-mass spectrometry imaging, sideroxylonal, specialized metabolites
Citation
Marques dos Santos B, Zibrandtsen JFS, Gunbilig D, Sørensen M, Cozzi F, Boughton BA, Heskes AM and Neilson EHJ (2019) Corrigendum: Quantification and Localization of Formylated Phloroglucinol Compounds (FPCs) in Eucalyptus Species. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1052. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01052
Received
03 July 2019
Accepted
29 July 2019
Published
28 August 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited and reviewed by
Judy Simon, Universität Konstanz, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Marques dos Santos, Zibrandtsen, Gunbilig, Sørensen, Cozzi, Boughton, Heskes and Neilson.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Elizabeth Heather Jakobsen Neilson, en@plen.ku.dk
†Present address: Juliane F. S. Zibrandtsen, Syngenta Ltd, Manchester, United Kingdom; Federico Cozzi, BIOMIN Research Center Technopark, Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
This article was submitted to Functional Plant Ecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.