Abstract
Rock powders are low-cost potential sources of most of the nutrients required by higher plants for growth and development. However, slow dissolution rates of minerals represent an obstacle to the widespread use of rock powders in agriculture. Rhizosphere processes and biological weathering may further enhance mineral dissolution since the interaction between minerals, plants, and bacteria results in the release of macro- and micronutrients into the soil solution. Plants are important agents in this process acting directly in the mineral dissolution or sustaining a wide diversity of weathering microorganisms in the root environment. Meanwhile, root microorganisms promote mineral dissolution by producing complexing ligands (siderophores and organic acids), affecting the pH (via organic or inorganic acid production), or performing redox reactions. Besides that, a wide variety of rhizosphere bacteria and fungi could also promote plant development directly, synergistically contributing to the weathering activity performed by plants. The inoculation of weathering bacteria in soil or plants, especially combined with the use of crushed rocks, can increase soil fertility and improve crop production. This approach is more sustainable than conventional fertilization practices, which may contribute to reducing climate change linked to agricultural activity. Besides, it could decrease the dependency of developing countries on imported fertilizers, thus improving local development.
Introduction
The green revolution in the 1950s caused a dramatic increase in food production. It was driven by the introduction of new technologies and practices, especially the massive use of synthetic fertilizers. The average percentage of yield attributable to commercial fertilizers ranged from 30–50% in the United Kingdom and United States, and tended to be much higher in the tropics (Stewart et al., 2005). In this context, the global demand for nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) is expected to reach 200,919 thousand tonnes by 2022 (FAO, 2019).
Despite the increase in crop production promoted in the last century by intensive farming and agrochemicals use, it has not been accomplished without environmental impacts (Ramankutty et al., 2018). The excess of high-soluble fertilizers has caused serious eutrophication in the aquatic environment (Bennett E.M. et al., 2001; Ghaly and Ramakrishnan, 2015). This phenomenon is responsible for the death of fish and benthic invertebrates due to the blooming of algae and cyanobacteria, causing a decrease in water quality through toxin production, hypoxia, and anoxia in the hydric bodies (Huisman et al., 2018).
Additionally, emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) represent the most important driver of human-induced climate change. The food production system is responsible for 29% of global GHG emissions, being the manufacture and application of fertilizers one of the main sources of emissions (Vermeulen et al., 2012). Even more concerning is the fact that climate change and agriculture are interrelated processes, i.e., the climate change will also affect agriculture. One of the most visible consequences of a warming world is an increase in the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events such as droughts, heatwaves, floods, and irregular patterns of precipitation. According to Vogel et al. (2019), climate extremes explain 18–43% of global maize (Zea mays L.), soybean (Glycine max L.), rice (Oryza sativa L.), and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop yield variations. Warmer temperatures affect the plant’s ability to get and use moisture, thus impacting development and grain production (Cline, 2008). A two degrees Celsius warming could reduce major crop yields by 3–13% worldwide (Wang et al., 2020). As a consequence of global warming, drylands are also expected to expand, raising the risk of land degradation and desertification, consequently reducing areas available for crop production (Huang et al., 2017; Huang et al., 2020).
One of the major post-green revolution challenges is increasing food production to feed the growing human population and at the same time reduce the environmental impacts of crop production (Godfray et al., 2010; Cole et al., 2018). Responding to climate change demands intense adaptive and mitigating actions to ensure productivity (Jain, 2012; Springmann et al., 2018). Several alternatives for improving plant nutrition and consequently crop yield are applicable, such as the increase in efficiency of conventional fertilizer management considering a rational use of soil, water, and plant nutrient resources; the adoption of new technological fertilizers; development of genetically modified crops; and, the exploration of beneficial interactions between plants and rhizosphere microorganisms (Campbell et al., 2014; Bindraban et al., 2015; Timilsena et al., 2015; Gouda et al., 2018; Bailey-Serres et al., 2019).
Among the possible approaches to mitigate climate change, N-fixing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, collectively known as rhizobia, have been extensively investigated due to their exceptional quality to establish functional symbiosis with legumes (Lindström and Mousavi, 2020). As a result of this interaction, inoculants formulated with rhizobia have been successfully used for the reduction and replacement of N fertilizer in leguminous crops, especially considering soybean (Vargas et al., 2017). However, to develop bacterial inoculants that represent an efficient and viable alternative to fertilizers, the investigation of additional plant-bacteria associations characteristics is still in high demand (Franche et al., 2009; Sammauria et al., 2020). The rhizosphere bacteria have a huge potential for plant growth promotion (PGP) characteristics, such as the ability to secrete phytohormones and siderophores, increase availability and uptake macro- and micronutrients, trigger plant defense reactions against phytopathogens, and increasing plant tolerance to environmental stresses (Gouda et al., 2018).
Rock powders extracted from local reserves are also an important alternative to manufactured fertilizers. This strategy contributes to the recovery of degraded lands, the mineralogical rejuvenation of soils, and the increase in essential nutrients availability. Crushed rocks are less susceptible to nutrient leaching, besides being cheaper than conventional fertilizers (Fyfe et al., 2006; Manning and Theodoro, 2020). However, the recurrent low solubility of these materials limits its agronomic effectiveness as potential fertilizers. On the other hand, a key bacterial mechanism to improve plant nutrition relies on its capability to release nutrients as a result of the weathering process of soil minerals (Calvaruso et al., 2006). The action of such microorganisms could represent an ecologically correct and cost-effective way to improve not only the availability of indigenous nutrients from the soil but to also increase the solubilization of rock powders applied as a soil amendment.
In the present review, we discuss the potential of weathering bacteria to increase plant growth and crop yields by releasing macro- and micronutrients from soil minerals or crushed rocks applied in croplands.
“Rocks for Crops”: An Eco-Friendly and Low-Cost Source of Nutrients for Plant Growth
The high cost of commercial fertilizers is a critical threat to food security in regions where small farmers play an important role in food production. This is, for instance, the case of Brazil, a country that imports about 70% of the nitrogen (N), 50% of phosphorus (P2O5), and more than 90% of the potassium (K2O) from total consumed fertilizers, so that international price fluctuations can prevent the purchase of fertilizers (Ogino et al., 2021). Consequently, the low fertilizer input on soils limits agricultural productivity, affecting the household earnings and diminishing dietary nutrients intake. There is a direct link between low soil fertility and chronic poverty in several countries, especially in Africa (Barrett and Bevis, 2015).
The “agrogeology,” or the use of “rocks for crops,” as Van Straaten (2002) defined, is a promising approach that could help countries to reduce the dependency on imported fertilizers using their own geological resources (Van Straaten, 2006). The domestic and unexplored resources of minerals are a low-cost source of plant nutrients for agricultural purposes. Despite the importance of such minerals being generally neglected due to their low price in the international market, they present a high potential for local development (Franks, 2020). In Brazil, the adoption of rock powder as a remineralizer has been a matter of intense and prolific agronomic research which resulted in a movement known as “rochagem” (Leonardos et al., 2000). The use and commercialization of such materials are regulated by law 12.890 (Brazil, 2013). Additionally, the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Food Supply (MAPA), through normative instructions (IN 05 and 06), establishes clear definitions for registering and marketing of remineralizers. Those regulations ensure the agronomic effectiveness and security of commercial rock powder to farmers (Manning and Theodoro, 2020).
The application of rock powder is an advantageous practice adaptable to crop demands in different environments. However, remineralizers are especially beneficial in tropical soils, which are widely present in several developing nations. This type of soil is typically acid, susceptive to intense weathering rates, and has low N and P content. In this context, rock powder and minerals additionally help to raise the pH (liming effect), conserve nutrients, and preserve water quality (Leonardos et al., 2000; Van Straaten, 2002). Rocks fragments used as mulch material can reduce evaporative losses and conserve soil moisture (Groenevelt et al., 1989; Jiménez et al., 2017). Additionally, the usage of crushed rock is in conformance with organic agriculture requirements, a type of farming that is steadily increasing in the world (Manning and Theodoro, 2020).
The rocks successfully used in crop production include mostly single-nutrient rocks, such as rock phosphate (RP), and multi-nutrient silicate rocks (Van Straaten, 2006). RP is a raw material for the manufacturing of high-soluble P fertilizers and other industrial products. However, the direct application of RP in soils promotes a slow release of nutrients preventing losses by leaching, thus representing a more sustainable practice than conventional fertilization (Fayiga and Nwoke, 2016). The agronomical effectiveness of this approach depends on the chemical and mineralogical composition of these rocks, soil characteristics, environmental conditions, crop requirements, and agricultural management (Lompo et al., 2018). Considering that not all RP nutrients are readily available for plant uptake, solubilizing microorganisms could represent an alternative to increase its efficacy. The microorganisms could be inoculated in the soil or plants concomitantly with RP addition, or they could be used in the pretreatment of RP for partial solubilization before applying to the soil (Arcand and Schneider, 2006).
Agricultural production associated with inadequate management of soils and unbalanced fertilization results in nutrient depletion and yield reduction (Tan et al., 2005). The replenishment of leached or degraded soils to the nutrient levels of natural fertile soils can be achieved by supplying crushed rocks and silicate minerals of diverse composition into the system (Leonardos et al., 1987). Silicate rocks include a wide range of minerals (i.e., mica, quartz, pyroxene, and feldspar) and are a potential source of macro- and micronutrients. Despite being mostly explored as K sources, silicate can also supply other plant’s nutritional needs (Harley and Gilkes, 2000; Manning, 2010). However, in a similar way as RP, many types of silicate rocks are inappropriate for plant fertilization once the chemical and mineralogical properties of the rock must be adequate to soil characteristics and crop requirements. Even with a high absolute content of nutrients, the determinant aspect of nutrient availability is the rate of mineral dissolution (Manning and Theodoro, 2020). In this sense, the soil microbial community could also play a central role in that process increasing the benefits of silicate rocks (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1

Beneficial effects for crop production from the use of rock powder associated with weathering bacteria. Rock powder extracted from local reserves is an important alternative to manufactured fertilizers. The inoculation of weathering bacteria increases plant growth and crop yields by releasing of macro- and micronutrients from soil minerals or crushed rocks applied in crop fields. Some weathering bacteria living in the rhizosphere can also display plant growth-promoting abilities (i.e., plant hormone production, N fixation, stress reduction, antimicrobials synthesis), enhancing plant development, or even protecting them against phytopathogens. The weathering of silicate rocks applied in croplands leads to the capture of CO2 and the release of carbonates and bicarbonates. This process can be microbiologically enhanced by weathering bacteria inoculated in soils (created with BioRender.com).
Silicate rocks could act as remineralizers through the promotion of smectite (2:1 clays) minerals formation (Leonardos et al., 2000). Besides improving the chemical and nutritional properties of the soil, the application of such rocks and minerals also increases the soil CEC (cation exchange capacity) and suppresses toxic aluminum (Al) and manganese (Mn), present in high content in oxisols (Anda et al., 2015). In addition, the use of silicate rocks is a promising mechanism for GHG reduction considering that the weathering reactions of Ca/Mg-rich silicate minerals capture carbon dioxide from the environment and release bicarbonates (HCO3–) and carbonates (CO32–). Such compounds could runoff to the sea, where they contribute to reducing ocean acidification (Andrews and Taylor, 2019). This acidification process is a result of increased atmospheric CO2 altering seawater carbonate chemistry, which affects mainly shell-forming organisms (Doney et al., 2009). Thus, the buffering effect of carbonate/bicarbonate released from rock weathering not only protects marine life but also promotes carbon storage for thousands of years in the oceans (Beerling et al., 2018).
Biological Weathering: The Role of Weathering Microorganisms
Weathering is a term which describes the general process by which rocks are broken down into such things as sediments, clays, soils, and substances that are dissolved in water Zaharescu et al. (2020). This process is responsible for soil formation and it is one of the most relevant processes in the geological cycle of essential mineral elements, with singular importance in determining inherent fertility and availability of macro- and micronutrients that support the establishment and growth of plants (Wilson, 2004). The integrated effect of organisms, water, and atmosphere on dissolution and crystallization of minerals and rocks causes weathering to be often classified in physical, chemical, and biological processes (Formoso, 2006).
Thousands of years are usually needed to convert inorganic bedrock into fertile soils with distinct horizons (Kalev and Toor, 2018), being the initial process of soil formation highly dependent on microbial activity on weathering of bedrock material and formation of interfaces for nutrient turnover. The establishment of the initial microbial life is influenced by chemical composition and physical structure of the parent materials in which soils form, where compounds based on C or N are often scarce (Schulz et al., 2013).
Biofilm formation is a determinant step to the microbial establishment and weathering activity. Surface-attached bacteria are expected to promote a higher dissolution of elements from mineral particles than planktonic cells do (Ahmed and Holmström, 2015). Biofilms comport a matrix of extracellular polysaccharide, forming a hydrated gel that wraps microorganisms and adheres them to rock surfaces. This environment supports and protects microbial activity mostly against desiccation and external interferents (Kemmling et al., 2004). Besides that, biofilms allow concentrating organic acids, siderophores and other chelating compounds, and other weathering agents in the organism/mineral interface. It also favors cell-to-cell communication and microbial interactions. Consequently, this structure allows a synergic effect of different microorganisms and biological processes on mineral dissolution (Finlay et al., 2020).
Lichens are one of the pioneer organisms that establish on rocks. The adhesion of lichen causes physical fragmentation of minerals by hyphal penetration in rock surfaces (Banfield et al., 1999; Chen et al., 2000). The fixed carbon provided by the photosynthetic symbiont promotes the development of fungi and other microorganisms. The subsequent secretion of several organic acids causes an intense chemical weathering process (Adamo and Violante, 2000). Several other organisms could also be powerful agents in the initial weathering of rocks, including fungi, bacteria, cyanobacteria, archaea, and mosses. Those microorganisms cause mineral disaggregation, dissolution, hydration, and secondary mineral formation directly or indirectly (Jackson, 2015; Zaharescu et al., 2020).
Plant nutrients, except for N, derive ultimately from the weathering of primary minerals. Therefore, the action of pioneer microorganisms is essential for the subsequent settlement of plants. Plants, in their turn, also promote a significant weathering of soil minerals through improving basic soil properties, affecting water dynamics and cycling of cations in soil solution (Li et al., 2006). Root exudates contain organic acids and chemical ligands that promote mineral solubilization (Kelly et al., 1998; Lucas, 2001). The exudation rates occur in response to plant nutrition demands and rise with increasing root surface area and tip number (Aoki et al., 2012). Besides that, plants also release sugars, amino acids, enzymes, fatty acids, sterols, growth factors, vitamins, and secondary metabolites, transforming the region surrounding the roots in a nutritional environment that could support a luxuriant diversity of microorganisms (Vives-Peris et al., 2020). That region, called rhizosphere, promotes an intense weathering of soil minerals at higher rates than those of bulk soil (Richter et al., 2007).
Rhizosphere bacteria can directly solubilize minerals from soil (direct microbial weathering) or can increase plant fitness and growth, benefiting from the plant weathering activity (indirect microbial weathering) (Figure 2). As previously mentioned, different diazotrophic bacteria colonize the rhizosphere and supply N compounds via the N fixation process (Goswami et al., 2016), being such ability especially important for the weathering activity of pioneer plants in the early stage of soil formation when N is frequently scarce (Schulz et al., 2013). Interestingly, roots development and architecture can also be directly modulated by associated bacteria (Verbon and Liberman, 2016). These organisms could affect the balance of phytohormones by the synthesis of auxins. Such compounds increase the growth of root hairs and lateral roots, enhancing root exudation and consequently increase the mineral weathering performed by plants (Calvaruso et al., 2006; Spaepen and Vanderleyden, 2011).
FIGURE 2

Mechanisms related to weathering of rocks and minerals by soil bacteria. Weathering bacteria perform redox reactions or produce compounds such as organic/inorganic acids and chelating agents that directly affect the dissolution of minerals (represented by curved black arrows). Rhizosphere bacteria can promote plant growth by different mechanisms, such as plant hormone production, N fixation, stress reduction, antimicrobials synthesis (represented by white arrows), and this way, these microorganisms increase the mineral weathering performed by plants indirectly. The beneficial effect of rhizobacteria enhances plant root development and consequently the releasing of exudates (i.e., organic acids) related to weathering by plants. Different organic compound of root exudates (represented by red arrows) supplies bacterial growth and indirectly favors nutrients release from minerals by weathering bacteria activity. Dashed arrows represent nutrients and organic compound uptake by bacteria (created with BioRender.com).
The expression of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase is also an important bacterial mechanism for plant growth promotion. This enzyme regulates the ethylene levels on plants, reducing the stress response under different biotic and abiotic conditions (Glick, 2014). Rock weathering in dry environments and deserts, for example, can be mediated by the action of plant and rhizosphere microbes (Puente et al., 2004a,b). Such microorganisms exhibit the ability of plant growth promotion, favoring plant colonization in these extreme conditions.
Rhizosphere microorganisms can also inhibit the development of plant pathogens by the production of enzymes, antimicrobial peptides, antibiotics, antifungals, and other antimicrobial compounds (Tariq et al., 2017; Volpiano et al., 2018). Plant and associated bacteria keep an important chemical communication at the rhizosphere level (Rosier et al., 2018). The “cry for help” model establishes that stressed plants assemble protective microbiomes recruiting beneficial bacterial through chemotactic metabolites in root exudates (Rolfe et al., 2019). These close interactions with bacteria are strategic for plant adaption to different environments and consequently can affect plant weathering activity.
Direct Mechanisms of Mineral Weathering by Bacteria: A General Overview
The mineral dissolution resulting from the microbial activity can be either an active or a collateral process. The weathering outcome could be a consequence of diverse energy-consuming processes that release metabolic by-products that can affect mineral solubilization (Banfield et al., 1999, Bennett P.C. et al., 2001). Nevertheless, weathering frequently occurs under cellular control in response to microorganism’s nutrition and growth requirements. Therefore, the mineral composition and the demands of the microbial community directly influence weathering rates (Bennett P.C. et al., 2001). The main mechanisms usually related to bacterial weathering include pH changes surrounding the mineral particle and proton promoted dissolution, chelation of elements present in a mineral matrix or the soil, and redox reactions (Figure 2; Samuels et al., 2020).
Different bacterial processes result in inorganic acid production. Sulfuric acid, for example, can be generated by sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (i.e., some species belonging to the Thiobacillus genus), while nitrifying bacteria can produce nitric acid during nitrification reactions (Ranalli et al., 2019). The pH change promoted by microbial activity can alter the solubility of ions, perturbing the ionic concentration equilibrium in the mineral-solution interface by directing the equilibrium in favor of mineral dissolution. The acidification process is frequently related to organic or inorganic acid production. Some of the most frequent organic acids include formic, citric, gluconic, acetic, lactic, oxalic, succinic, and pyruvic acids. These substances are usually byproducts of the metabolism of carbon sources (Zhu et al., 2014; Samuels et al., 2020).
Carbonic acid formation as a result of CO2 releasing from aerobic respiration also represents an important mechanism related to acidification. However, this process is a relatively slow reaction that may be enhanced by the expression of carbonic anhydrase, which catalyzes the reversible hydration of CO2 (CO2 + H2O ⇌ HCO3– + H+; Tripp et al., 2001). This enzyme is widespread and present in several bacterial strains (Smith and Ferry, 2000), with a relevant function in mineral weathering such as evidenced for calcite dissolution (Xiao et al., 2014).
Siderophores and organic acids are the main chelating agents produced by weathering bacteria. Organic acids not only acidify the mineral surrounding environment, but the deprotonated forms of these compounds also chelate ions in soil solution, affecting dissolution rates. The carboxylic groups of organic acid structures, dissociated from H+ and negatively charged, are ligand sites for cations. The number of carboxyl, therefore, affects the chelating capacity, and tri- and dicarboxylic acids are more efficient solubilizers than monocarboxylic acids (Adeleke et al., 2017; Lazo et al., 2017). Siderophores are ferric ion-specific chelators secreted under iron stressed condition. These non-ribosomal peptides have been classified as catecholate, hydroxamate, carboxylate, and mixed types (Khan et al., 2018). These substances are especially relevant in the solubilization of Fe silicates and other Fe-bearing minerals (Ahmed and Holmström, 2014; Torres et al., 2014). Conveniently, siderophores can non-specifically complex different other metallic ions (i.g. Co, Cr, Mn, and Mo) by acting on the weathering of rocks and minerals containing these elements (Duckworth and Sposito, 2005; Liermann et al., 2005; Bi et al., 2010; Duckworth et al., 2014).
Oxidation and reduction reactions of a compound present in a mineral particle are expected to destabilize the crystalline structure, causing its dissolution (Uroz et al., 2009). Several bacterial strains use metals as terminal electron acceptors during anaerobic respiration. A well-known example is Fe-reducing bacteria, such as members from the genera Desulfuromonas (Vandieken et al., 2006) and Shewanella (Bose et al., 2009). These bacteria can use Fe (III) from different Fe oxides and clay minerals (Colombo et al., 2014). An Additional important weathering process is related to Fe oxidation reactions. Geoalkalibacter ferrihydriticus Z-0531T, for example, can anaerobically oxidizes Fe2+ with carbonate as an electron acceptor. This reaction causes the weathering of phyllosilicates, such as biotite and glauconite (Zavarzina et al., 2016).
Efficacy and Specific Mechanisms of Weathering Bacteria to Enhance Nutrient Availability to Crops
Several studies have reported an enhanced release of key nutrients from minerals and rocks due to the inoculation of efficient weathering bacteria on plants and/or soils (Tables 1, 2). Some studies have evaluated how the plant-bacteria interaction increases the dissolution of a range of elemental nutrients (Puente et al., 2004a,b; Calvaruso et al., 2006; Lopez and Bacilio, 2020). In the present review, we initially focus on reports addressing the weathering of P- and K-bearing rocks, the two main macronutrients from mineral sources.
TABLE 1
| Bacterial species | Crop/plant specie | Mineral source | Type of experiment | Results | References |
| Burkholderia gladioli MTCC 10216; B. gladioli MTCC10217, Enterobacter aerogenes MTCC 10208, and Serratia marcescens MTCC 10238 | Stevia rebaudiana | Mussoorie rock phosphate | Pot experiment | Enhanced plant growth and content of stevioside and rebaudioside-A metabolites. Increased P availability in soils | Gupta et al., 2011 |
| Staphylococcus scirui; Bacillus pumilus; Bacillus subtilis; and Bacillus cereus | Rice | Rock phosphate* | Pot/field experiment | Increased yield | Rajapaksha and Senanayake, 2011 |
| Pseudomonas sp. RT5RP2 and Pseudomonas sp. RT6RP | Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik. cv. VL Masoor 507) | Udaipur rock phosphate | Pot experiment | Increased P uptake by plants | Selvakumar et al., 2013 |
| Pantoea cypripedii (PSB-3) and Pseudomonas plecoglossicida (PSB-5) | Wheat (var. PBW-621) Maize (var. DKC-9106) | Rock phosphate* | Field experiment | Increased the crop growth, biomass, grain yield, and total P uptake by plants | Kaur and Reddy, 2015 |
| Burkholderia sp. UFLA 04-21; Paenibacillus kribbensis UFLA 03- 10; Enterobacter sp. UFPI B5-6; and Pseudomonas sp. UFPI B5-8A | Rice | Bayóvar rock phosphate | Pot experiment | Increased plant biomass, number of tillers and accumulation of nutrients | Costa et al., 2015 |
| Bacillus thuringiensis “serovar ostriniae” (PSM1) and Bacillus sp. Cp-h60 (PSM2) | Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) var. Noor-2009 and lentil var. PunjabMasoor-2009 | Rock phosphate* | Pot experiment | Increased soil aggregate stability and P-release. Increased plant growth, dry weight of nodules, and grain yield | Ditta et al., 2018 |
| Pseudomonas corrugata SP77, Pseudomonas koreensis LT62, and Pseudomonas frederiksbergensis G62 | Medicago truncatula Gaertn. | Tunisian rock phosphate | Pot experiment | Enhanced shoot dry weight and nodule fresh weigh | Ben Zineb et al., 2020 |
| Bacillus sp. SM0307, Bacillus sp. SS0303, Bacillus sp. SS0306, Bacillus sp. RP10, and Bacillus sp. RP5. | Wheat var. FARAJ | Moroccan natural phosphate | Glass tubes culture | Improved biometric parameters and P content of plants | Azaroual et al., 2020 |
| Serratia plymuthica BMA1 | Vicia faba L. (var. bachar) | Rock phosphate* | Pot experiment | Increased plant growth and P uptake by plants | Borgi et al., 2020 |
Examples of PSB inoculation associated with rock phosphate fertilization.
*Rock phosphate origin not specified.
TABLE 2
| Bacteria | Crop | Mineral source | Type of experiment | Results | References |
| Bacillus cereus | Potato (Kara Spp.) | K-feldspar | Field experiment | Increased plant growth, yield, soil nutrient availability, and plant nutrient uptake | Ali et al., 2020 |
| Klebsiella oxytoca KSB-17 | Maize | Waste mica | Pot experiment | Improved plant growth | Imran et al., 2020 |
| Pseudomonas sp. | Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) | Muscovite | Pot experiment | Increased plant biomass and K uptake | Sarikhani et al., 2018 |
| Bacillus pseudomycoides O-5 | Camellia sinensis L. | Waste mica | Pot experiment | Increased K availability in soil, and that in turn facilitated K uptake by plant | Pramanik et al., 2019 |
| Bacillus subtilis ANctcri3; B. megaterium ANctcri7 | Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicolson (elephant foot yam) | Feldspar rock powder (K 3.9%) | Field experiment | Increased tuber yield | Anjanadevi et al., 2016 |
| Enterobacter sp. GL7, Klebsiella sp. JM3, Klebsiella sp. XF4, and Klebsiella sp. XF11 | Tabaco | K-feldspar | Pot experiment | Increased plant biomass and plant uptake of K and N | Zhang and Kong, 2014 |
| Bacillus mucilaginosus, Azotobacter chroococcum, and Rhizobium spp. | Maize cv. “Navjot” and wheat cv. “HD-2733” | Waste mica | Hydroponic experiment | Increased biomass accumulation and K uptake by plants as well as chlorophyll and crude protein content in plant tissue | Singh et al., 2010 |
| Bacillus mucilaginosus | Sudan grass (Sorghum vulgare Pers.) var. Sudanensis | Waste mica | Pot experiment | Increased biomass yield and K uptake | Basak and Biswas, 2009 |
| Bacillus edaphicus NBT | Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cv. Simian and rape (Brassica napus L.) cv. Zhongyou-1 | Illite | Pot experiment | Increased plant growth, K uptake by plants and K availability in soil | Sheng and He, 2006 |
Examples of plant inoculation with KSB associated to fertilization with K-bearing rocks/mineral.
Weathering Bacteria and P Availability
Several studies have explored the action of weathering bacteria of releasing nutrients from minerals and rocks, being the solubilization of P the best characterized. This is not a coincidence, considering that P is the second most important nutrient required for the maximum yield of agriculturally important crops. P can be found in organic and inorganic forms in the soil, but a small percentage is presented in a soluble form rapidly available to plant uptake (Syers et al., 2008). Even when soluble forms of inorganic P fertilizers are applied to the soil, they are rapidly immobilized due to complex formation with highly reactive Fe and Al oxides in acid soils and with calcium in calcareous soils (Chacon et al., 2006).
A specific group of bacteria known as P-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) has been reported as capable of solubilizing inorganic P, including strains belonging to species from the genera Rhizobium (Sridevi and Mallaiah, 2009), Bacillus (Saeid et al., 2018), Methylobacterium (Agafonova et al., 2013), Pantoea (Son et al., 2006), Enterobacter (Mendoza-Arroyo et al., 2020), Bradyrhizobium (Marra et al., 2011), Gluconacetobacter (Crespo et al., 2011), Azospirillum (Rodriguez et al., 2004), Microbacterium (Rivas et al., 2004), Paenibacillus (Zhang et al., 2013), Burkholderia, Pseudomonas, and Streptomyces (Zhao et al., 2014).
The use of PSB was first reported in the 1950s, when “phosphobacterin,” a fertilizer consisting of kaolin rocks impregnated with spores of a Bacillus megaterium var. phosphaticum (formerly Megatherium viphosphateum) strain was used in soils in the URSS, resulting in crop yield increases ranging from 0 to 70% (Cooper, 1959; Menkina, 1963). Since the first reports of 70 years ago, PSB benefits have been demonstrated for different and agronomically relevant crops. The main observed effects in crop production include the reduction in the application of traditional fertilizers (Sundara et al., 2002), the improvement on the efficacy of low-cost RP, the reduction of P losses in the soil, and the improvement of plant development (Kaleem Abbasi and Manzoor, 2018). In Table 1, different studies were summarized considering the concomitant effect of PSB inoculation with the RP soil amendment.
P-solubilizing bacteria can act synergistically with other plant growth-promoting microorganisms, enhancing plant fitness and plant nutrition at higher rates than those arising from a single factor (Yu et al., 2012; Zaidi et al., 2017). One of the most frequent strategies for this is to combine PSB with N-fixing symbiotic bacteria for inoculation of legumes. The co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium with distinct Pseudomonas PSB strains on soybean can enhance nodule number, plant growth, grain yield, P uptake by plants and reduce the P fertilizer input (Son et al., 2007; Afzal et al., 2010; Argaw, 2012). Similar effects have also been reported by combining other rhizobia with different PSB strains, such as co-inoculation of diazotrophic Rhizobium sp. and PSB Pseudomonas fluorescens on common bean (Samavat et al., 2012), Bradyrhizobium sp. and PSB Pantoea sp. on peanut (Taurian et al., 2013), Sinorhizobium meliloti B399 and the PSB strains Pseudomonas sp. FM7d and Bacillus sp. on alfalfa (Guiñazú et al., 2010), and Mesorhizobium sp. and PSB Bacillus sp. on chickpea (Wani et al., 2007). Another promising approach is the combination of PSB with mycorrhizal fungi. While PSB enhance the P availability from sparingly soluble P sources, fungus efficiently absorbs and transports the nutrient to the host plant. This strategy has been reported to significantly increase plant development and P uptake on different plant species and soil conditions (Azcon et al., 1976; Suri and Choudhary, 2013; Nacoon et al., 2020). Triple inoculation of PSB, mycorrhizal and diazotrophic bacteria are also a potential alternative to enhance the efficiency of RP fertilization. Zaidi and Khan (2006) reported an improvement in plant vigor, nutrient uptake, and yield of green gram fertilized with RP and inoculated with N-fixing Bradyrhizobium sp., PSB Bacillus subtilis and mycorrhizal Glomus fasciculatum.
The mechanisms by which P is released from insoluble sources by PSB could be mediated by acidification, chelation, exchange reactions, and formation of exopolysaccharide (EPS), which may be related to the production of organic acids (Chen et al., 2016; Wei et al., 2018) or the release of protons accompanying respiration or NH4+ assimilation (Illmer and Schinner, 1995). EPS act synergically with organic acids on P solubilization. These polymeric substances change the homeostasis of P-solubilization by displaying a P-holding capacity, pushing it toward dissolved P, consequently resulting in greater P release from insoluble sources (Yi et al., 2008).
Gluconic acid is a frequently reported organic acid agent produced by PSB associated with P solubilization. Rodriguez et al. (2004) evaluated the Azospirillum brasilense strains Cd and 8-I and Azospirillum lipoferum JA4 for P solubilization from sparingly soluble calcium phosphate. For the three PSB strains, gluconic acid was the sole organic acid detected by HPLC. As expected, the released soluble P from calcium phosphate was reported as associated with a reduction in the pH of the medium. Similarly, Kim et al. (1997) related an increase in soluble P concentrations associated with a decrease in the pH of the culture medium while evaluating ISL19, a Rahnella aquatilis PSB strain isolated from the soybean rhizosphere that shows a strong ability to solubilize hydroxyapatite. In this study, gluconic acid was also the main organic acid released into the medium by the bacteria.
The conversion of glucose to gluconic acid by PSB is catalyzed by glucose dehydrogenase (GDH), an important membrane-bound enzyme involved in the direct oxidative pathway of glucose catabolism (Olijve and Kok, 1979; Neijssel et al., 1983). Genetic engineering approach with genes encoding glucose dehydrogenase (gcd) has proved that mineral phosphate solubilization by PSB was accompanied by gluconic acid formation. De Werra et al. (2009) assessed the role of gluconic acid production for P-solubilizing ability of P. fluorescens CHA0. The authors used engineered CHA0 mutants with deletions of gcd and gluconate dehydrogenase (gad), the gene required for the conversion of gluconic acid into 2-ketogluconate. The wild-type CHA0 and the Δgad mutant (CHA1197) strongly acidified the medium, while the absence of gcd in the Δgcd (CHA1196) and the Δgcd Δgad (CHA1198) mutants resulted in less acidification of the glucose solution. The wild-type CHA0 produced acid on tricalcium phosphate [Ca3(PO4)2] medium, which resulted in the formation of a clear halo (4.2 ± 0.8 mm in diameter). The gcd defect in the strains CHA1196 and CHA1198 resulted in a loss of P-solubilizing ability, which resulted in no halo formation. The absence of gad caused the accumulation of gluconic acid in the strain CHA1197, which resulted in a significantly greater P solubilization (halo diameter, 5.6 ± 0.9 mm). Several other studies characterized the role of GDH on P solubilization by different bacterial species, such as Erwinia herbicola (Goldstein and Liu, 1987), Pseudomonas frederiksbergensis (Zeng et al., 2016), and Serratia marcescens (Krishnaraj and Goldstein, 2001).
Weathering Bacteria and K Availability
After P and N, K is often considered the most important nutrient affecting the growth, metabolism, and development of plants. Among the essential elements, K is usually the most abundant in soils. This nutrient can be found as water-soluble or solution K directly available for plant uptake; exchangeable K on the surface of clay minerals and organic matter, which is easily released to replenish water-soluble K; non-exchangeable K mainly on silicate layers and slowly released; and, insoluble rocks and minerals containing K, which represent more than 98% of the soil K and can only become available slowly through long-term soil weathering. Consequently, only 0.1–2% of the K content in soils is easily available for plant uptake (Reitemeier, 1951; Sparks and Huang, 1985).
Soluble K-fertilizers based on potash (“potassium-rich salt”) are produced mainly from mined salts (i.e., sylvite and carnallite). Comparing to N and P fertilizers, these sources demand less industrial and chemical processing to result in a fertilizer product (Manning, 2018). The main resources of K salts are in the northern hemisphere. Canada, Russia, and Belarus produced more than 90% of world potash (Ciceri et al., 2015). Historically, access to conventional potash fertilizer could be difficult due to high prices, transport, and even geopolitical reasons. This situation leads to the innovative use of different materials and geological resources as K fertilizers, being the use of silicate rocks a clear example of this (Manning, 2018). Despite the low solubility of silicate rocks, a group of weathering bacteria known as K-solubilizing bacteria (KSB) display an efficient ability to release K and others plant nutrients from these sources (Etesami et al., 2017).
Several works have isolated plant-associated KBS and characterized their ability to solubilize K-bearing minerals in vitro. Interestingly, these KSB are also reported with additional plant growth-promoting traits (i.e., N-fixation, P solubilization, auxin production), resulting in plant growth and nutrition increase under greenhouse and field conditions (Sugumaran and Janarthanam, 2007; Sangeeth et al., 2012; Bakhshandeh et al., 2017; Xiao et al., 2017; Yaghoubi Khanghahi et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2020). Despite the plant beneficial effect of these bacteria, frequently their ability to increase the solubility of rock powder or minerals applied as fertilizers in soils remains uncharacterized. Studies reporting increased effectiveness of fertilization from K-bearing minerals associated with inoculation of KSB are summarized in Table 2. Such examples demonstrate the potential of weathering bacteria to stimulate the use of rock powders as efficient fertilizers for different crops.
Similarly to PSB co-inoculation strategies, KSB could be employed with N-fixing bacteria, PSB, and mycorrhiza, displaying an increased effect on plant growth-promoting, soil nutrient availability, and nutrient uptake by plants (Han et al., 2006; Basak and Biswas, 2010; Dominguez-Nuñez et al., 2016). The weathering of K-bearing minerals also occurs by similar mechanisms described to P-solubilization, i.e., lowering soil pH, acidolysis, exchange reactions, complexation, and organic acid production (Sattar et al., 2019). The organic acid release seems to be the most widely studied mechanism of K solubilization. Several acids are reported, such as acid citric, ferulic, coumaric, malic, syringic (Setiawati and Mutmainnah, 2016). The common mechanism of gluconic acid production via direct oxidation of glucose by GDH is also related to K-solubilization (Wagh et al., 2016).
Weathering Bacteria and the Availability of Multi-Nutrients and Other Beneficial Elements
Silicate rocks can be used not only as K sources but it could also supply additional plant nutrition needs as it contains minor amounts of other macro and micronutrients (Priyono and Gilkes, 2004; Van Straaten, 2006). The soil inoculation with KSB and PSB could increase the plant uptake and biomass content of diverse nutrients (Costa et al., 2015; Yaghoubi Khanghahi et al., 2018). The combination of different rocks or mineral resources with these weathering bacteria represent an important strategy to supply plants with multi-nutrient, especially using K-bearing rocks concomitant with RP fertilizers. This approach was adopted by Leyval and Berthelin (1989) using a mixture of sand, RP, and mica (phlogopite) as the only source of P, Fe, Mg, and Al to cultivate Fagus sylvatica (common beech). Plants were inoculated with mycorrhizal fungus Laccaria laccata and an efficient P-solubilizing Agrobacterium strain. After two years, the co-inoculation treatments increased nutrients uptake and dry matter of roots. Using biotite and anorthite mixed into silica sand as sources of nutrients, Balogh-Brunstad et al. (2008) evaluated the effects of weathering bacteria combined with mycorrhizal fungi on chemical weathering for pine growth. The fungi Pisolithus tinctorius and Suillus tomentosus in association with bacteria (Ewingella americana, B. megaterium, and Pantoea agglomerans) were able to increase weathering fluxes, plant biomass, and cation uptake (Ca+2, Mg+2, and K+).
Positive effects of combining RP and K-bearing minerals were also reported by Badr et al. (2006). Six bacterial strains isolated from feldspar samples were capable of dissolve silicate minerals and RP in different in vitro growth conditions. Bacterial inoculation combined with the addition of K and P-bearing minerals on sorghum increased the dry matter of plants by 48–58% in different types of soil. The P uptake by plants increased 41–93%, while the K uptake increased 71–116%. Similarly, Abou-el-Seoud and Abdel-Megeed (2012) observed the highest improvement in maize growth and nutrient uptake when PSB (B. megaterium var. phosphaticum strain) and KSB (Bacillus mucilaginosus and B. subtilis strains) were co-inoculated in conjunction with direct application of rock phosphate (apatite) and K materials (feldspar and illite powder). Han et al. (2006) also investigated the potential of B. megaterium var. phosphaticum PSB and B. mucilaginosus KSB to increase the growth of pepper and cucumber. The highest nutrient availability and uptake also occurred when PSB and KSB were co-inoculated with RP and illite powder.
The supply of macro- and micronutrients is not the only advantage resulting from the weathering of silicate rocks. Other released elements, such as silicon (Si), can be important for plant health. Si is the second most abundant element in the Earth’s crust after oxygen. Si is traditionally not considered essential for plant development, however, it is found in plants at concentrations ranging from a fraction of 0.1 to 10% of dry weight (Epstein, 1994). Recently, Si has gained increasing attention in agriculture because of the accumulating evidence of its beneficial effects on several crop species. For further information on the Si role on plant growth and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, please see Currie and Perry (2007) and Luyckx et al. (2017).
The addition of Si fertilizer may become a recurrent agricultural practice in the future considering that the Si in agricultural soils is depleting due to its continual removal with the harvested product (Keller et al., 2012; Haynes, 2014). Recently, Kang et al. (2017) demonstrated the ability of the rice root-associated rhizobacteria Burkholderia eburnean CS4-2 to solubilize silicate and promote Si uptake in plants. Under greenhouse conditions, soil inoculation with CS4-2 combined with insoluble silica fertilization significantly promoted the growth of rice plants. Similarly, Chandrakala et al. (2019) showed the potential of Rhizobium sp. IIRR-1 to release soluble silica from insoluble inorganic (Ca, Al, K, and Mg) silicates. The Si solubilizing isolate also produced IAA and showed ACC deaminase activity in vitro. The IIRR-1 strain was inoculated in rice seeds under gnotobiotic conditions and showed the capacity to colonize plant roots and increase seedling vigor by 29.18%. Interestingly, Hu et al. (2018) isolated different Si-solubilizing bacteria from the gut of the earthworm Pheretima guillelmi. Three selected strains (Flavobacterium spp. 3C1, Pseudomonas spp. 3C5, and Bacillus spp. 4A2) were able to release soluble Si from feldspar and quartz powder. When inoculated in maize, the Flavobacterium spp. 3C1 increased Si uptake by plants and increased soluble Si contents in the soil.
Concomitant Use of Rocks and Weathering Bacteria as Fertilizers: Challenges and Future Directions
Concerning the interaction between rocks and microorganisms, environmental variations interfere not only with physical and chemical weathering rates of minerals but also with microbial survival, distribution, and metabolism, consequently with microbial weathering activity (Robert and Berthelin, 1986; Gordon, 2005; Gleeson et al., 2016). Different soil types, climate conditions, indigenous microbial communities, plant genotype, crop requirements, and farming practices strongly affect the plant growth-promoting effects of bacteria. These factors must be carefully investigated before the recommendation of new strains as inoculants (Saad et al., 2020). Several approaches have been developed and adopted to increase microbial inoculants’ effectiveness and can be suitable to improve the use of weathering bacteria associated with rock fertilizers.
In vitro investigations of microbial weathering have demonstrated that the solubilizing ability of PSB and KSB is mainly affected by factors such as the concentration of soluble P or K, C and N sources, and pH (Parmar and Sindhu, 2013; Musarrat and Khan, 2014). In the same way, soil experiments and field trials indicate that N fertilization, organic amendment, and lime addiction directly influence the effectiveness or abundance of solubilizing organisms (Adnan et al., 2017; Zheng et al., 2017; Kaleem Abbasi and Manzoor, 2018; Zheng et al., 2019). Therefore, these factors can be modulated to enhance bacterial solubilization of minerals. As an example, Mpanga et al. (2019) demonstrated that stabilized ammonium fertilizers increased the RP solubilization by different PSB inoculants better than using nitrate fertilizers. Likewise, organic amendments, such as manure and vermicompost, can significantly increase the bacterial efficiency of solubilizing P and K-bearing rocks in soils (Baldotto et al., 2012; Abbasi et al., 2015; Walpola and Hettiarachchi, 2020).
The influence of climate factors can be overcome by selecting genetically modified or adapted strains to different conditions. Trivedi and Sa (2008) successfully obtained mutants of Pseudomonas corrugata displaying an increased ability to solubilize phosphate and promote plant growth at lower temperatures. Using an isolation approach, Sarikhani et al. (2019) reported the obtention of thermotolerant P. agglomerans strains able to solubilize phosphate at 50°C. A bacterial inoculant based on RP as the carrier was formulated with these P. agglomerans strains and displayed stability for 4 months, which is highly convenient for inoculant trade and storage.
Salinity is another factor that influences solubilizing activity. Several studies have successfully selected salt-tolerant PGPB displaying diverse plant benefits under saline stress, including efficient halotolerant PSB and KSB (Jha et al., 2011; Rojas-Tapias et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2016; He et al., 2018; Ashfaq et al., 2020; Rojas-Solis et al., 2020). Jha and Subramanian (2016) reported KSB belonging to different genera that not only mobilized K from insoluble forms under salinity levels but also protect plants from salinity injury by enhancing their growth-related physiology. Such microorganisms reduced lipid peroxidation and increased plant cell stability under salt stress. Interestingly, Bokhari et al. (2019) isolated several Bacillus strains from desert plants but these microorganisms only displayed plant growth promotion ability under salt stress, suggesting that stressful conditions might trigger the production of plant factors that ultimately stimulate yet unknown bacterial factors related to plant tolerance.
The study of plant-bacteria interaction and weathering under extreme environments is useful to prospect weathering strains adapted to these adverse conditions and potentially applicable to agricultural production. Bashan et al. (2002, 2006) reported the presence of rock colonizing plants growing without benefit from the soil, and especially in weathering rocky cliffs, large rocks, and ancient lava flows in hot desert areas of Baja California, Mexico. Then, the same research group evaluated the microorganisms colonizing the rhizoplane of three species of cactus (Pachycereus pringlei, Stenocereus thurberi, Opuntia cholla) and a wild fig tree (Ficus palmeri) considered in its previous studies (Puente et al., 2004a,b). The dominant bacterial groups were fluorescent Pseudomonas and bacilli. Four isolated bacteria (Bacillus pumilus var. 2, B. subtilis var. 2, Actinomadura oligospora, and Citrobacter sp.) were reported to fix N, produce volatile and non-volatile organic acids, and significantly dissolve insoluble P (FePO4 and hydroxyapatite), extrusive igneous rock, marble, and limestone. The bacteria were able to release significant amounts of useful minerals, such as P, K, Mg, Mn, Fe, Cu, and Zn, from the rocks. P. pringlei seeds inoculated with these bacteria were reported to sprout and grow normally without added nutrients for at least 12 months in pulverized extrusive igneous rock (ancient lava flows) mixed with perlite, while non-inoculated cacti grew less vigorously or died. Several reports describe plant growth promotion of important crops by bacterial strains isolated from deserts and drought regions, including PSB and KSB (Gulati et al., 2010; Kavamura et al., 2013; Alkahtani et al., 2020; Kour et al., 2020b,c). Such microorganisms not only increase nutrient availability but also induce the accumulation of antioxidants and osmolytes, upregulating or downregulating stress-responsive genes (Kour et al., 2020a,b). For more details about the biological weathering by plant and bacteria under desertic and dry conditions, please see the recent review of Lopez and Bacilio (2020).
Another strategy to improve the effectiveness of microbial inoculants based on weathering bacteria is improving the prospection of novel strains displaying a potent mineral solubilizing ability. Traditional methods for isolation and screening of PSB and KSB are frequently based on common media formulations containing insoluble mineral sources. It considers the presence of solubilization haloes produced by bacteria in agar-based screenings or direct detection of soluble P and K released in liquid culture assays (Sharma et al., 2013; Etesami et al., 2017). Bashan et al. (2013a) emphasize that some of these conventional approaches fail to recover effective solubilizing bacteria when using inappropriate mineral sources for PSB screenings. Additionally, most putative PSB were found not to promote plant growth by P solubilization. Soil chemical proprieties are very variable and influence the P dynamics and bacterial solubilizing activity. The identification of effective PSB, for example, requires extensive testing, considering diverse sources of sparingly soluble minerals and plant tests (Bashan et al., 2013b).
Conventional culture media can recover less than 10% of plant-associated bacteria. The introduction of novel methods to increase microbial cultivability presents a huge potential to expand the isolation of plant beneficial organisms (Sarhan et al., 2019). Different methods based on in situ and high throughput cultivation have been proposed, such as diffusion chambers, microfluidic streak plate (MSP), hollow-fiber membrane chamber (HFMC), double encapsulation technique, soil substrate membrane system (SSMS), and isolation chip (Ichip) (Sarhan et al., 2019; Lewis et al., 2020). Other approaches include improved growth conditions and development of alternative culture media, especially considering oligotrophs requirements (Vartoukian et al., 2010), once this condition is more effective for the enrichment of rock-weathering bacteria (Hirsch et al., 1995). However, the extent of these methods on the study and recovering of weathering strains agronomically useful should be more explored.
Culture-independent methods based on molecular or genomics approaches can be useful for the identification of new genes and pathways related to mineral solubilization (Alaylar et al., 2020). As mentioned previously, the main characterized genes related to phosphate solubilizing ability are ppq and gcd. However, despite the frequent report of gluconic acid on the solubilization of minerals by weathering bacteria, several other organic acids display an important role in the weathering process of different minerals (Alori et al., 2017). However, genes, metabolic pathways, and their regulation on the context of weathering remaining poorly characterized.
It is possible to enhance further the biofertilizer potential of bacteria by manipulation of genes related to mineral solubilization (Sashidhar and Podile, 2010). Tripura et al. (2007) used ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis to produce S. marcescens GPS-5 mutants displaying enhanced mineral solubilizing ability. These authors obtained seven effective mutants showing the maximum (40%) increase in the amount of P solubilized from hydroxyapatite. Using a distinct strategy, Kumar et al. (2013) increased the mineral solubilization capacity of Enterobacter asburiae PSI3 by cloning on it an overexpressing gad operon derived from Pseudomonas putida KT 2440. Such bacteria efficiently produced 2-ketogluconic acid and solubilized RP. Similarly, Farhat et al. (2013) produced an engineered Escherichia coli strain expressing the genes gdh and pqqABCDE from mineral solubilizing S. marcescens CTM 50650. This E. coli strain was able to solubilize tricalcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite, and Gafsa rock phosphate (GRP). When immobilized in alginate beads, such microorganisms solubilized the highest amounts of P from GRP under repeated batch fermentation process. Genes related to other organic acids production are also potential targets for genetic engineering. The overexpression of citrate operon in Herbaspirillum seropedicae Z67 enhanced the ability to solubilize RP and increased the PGP effect on rice (Wagh et al., 2014).
The understanding of the genetic regulatory mechanism of mineral solubilization can be an important way to improve the efficiency of bacterial weathering. Soluble P has been reported to have an inhibitory effect on P-solubilizing ability and organic acid production by bacteria (Zeng et al., 2016, 2017; Liu J. et al., 2020). Carbon sources (e.g., succinate) commonly present in root exudates could also exhibit a repressive effect on PSB solubilization ability, as demonstrated in Acinetobacter sp. SK2 by Bharwad and Rajkumar (2020). These authors discussed that the failure of several PSB in field conditions could be attributed, in part, to these catabolite repression mechanisms, which control the expression of several genes and pathways including that of mineral solubilization. In this sense, regulatory mechanisms of organic acid production and release, as well as other weathering processes, can be a potential target to genetic engineering aiming to increase mineral solubilization and reduce such repressive effects.
The improvement of microbial inoculant formulations is another strategy to enhance the effectiveness of weathering bacteria. When directly applied in soil, PGPB competes with better-adapted indigenous microorganisms, as well as can be predated by soil microbiota, diminishing inoculant efficiency (Bashan, 2016). Inoculant formulations provide a protective microenvironment and increase bacterial viability for long periods, supporting PGPB establishment in soils. Inoculants are a combination of microbial cells with a carrier additive. It is formulated in liquid or solid forms (i.e., peat, powder, and granules) and adapted to different delivery strategies (Bashan et al., 2014). Polymeric substances, especially natural polysaccharides are extensively used as carriers and have demonstrated to increase inoculants efficacy, including for PSB and KSB inoculants. Bacterial encapsulation in a polymer matrix (i.g. alginate) is an advantageous approach that allows a control-release of cells and a higher protective effect compared with other formulations (Chaudhary et al., 2020; Vassilev et al., 2020). Positive effects have been obtained with immobilized PSB in alginate microbeads to increase P uptake by inoculated plants (Schoebitz et al., 2013; Mendoza-Arroyo et al., 2020). However, the widespread adoption of this technique has been limited by its high cost (John et al., 2011). The introduction of innovative materials as carriers is a promising tactic to improve inoculant formulations for mineral solubilization. Recently, Safari et al. (2020) employed nanomaterials (nanoclay and natural char nanoparticles) as addictive in PSB inoculants. Such formulations based on P. putida (PP20) and Pseudomonas kilonensis (PK11) strains successfully maintained bacterial viability and efficacy in solubilizing phosphate. In addition to improved formulations, the use of atmospheric pressure non-thermal plasma has a great potential to increase the vitality of PGPB. Ji et al. (2019) applied this technique in B. subtilis CB-R05, and such treatment accelerated bacterial growth and motility, increased bacterial colonization of plants, consequently enhancing plant growth-promoting effects.
Most of the studies discussed in the previous topics deal with a single bacterial inoculant or a combination of few microorganisms. However, the weathering process in soil occurs by integrative metabolism of plenty of microorganisms distributed on soil, each one possibly displaying particular weathering abilities (Wang et al., 2017). A better understanding of microbial weathering requires an integrative investigation of microbial communities and their complex interaction with different abiotic factors. Uroz et al. (2015) suggest that the environment on the surface and surround rocks particles and soil minerals composes a specific habitat of micro-organisms called “mineralosphere.” Such a region is an inorganic analogous to the rhizosphere. Mineralosphere is affected by external factors such as soil pH, temperature, and moisture, but also directly control the bacterial diversity by intrinsic characteristics such as mineral chemistry, weatherability, surface structure, and porosity (Uroz et al., 2015). The use of rock powders as fertilizers associated with bacteria requires considering the different mechanisms/factors that direct both environments, mineralosphere, and rhizosphere, and how these factors connect both regions. Several culture-independent methods, mainly based on metagenomic approaches, have expanded the knowledge about the dynamics of soil microbial communities under weathering and crop production (Chhabra et al., 2013; Uroz et al., 2013; Carbonetto et al., 2014; Gómez-Merino et al., 2015).
Microbial inoculants can lead to significant changes in the diversity and abundance of indigenous soil microbial communities affecting their functional capabilities. Inoculated bacteria establish antagonistic/synergistic interactions with different members of the microbial rhizosphere community and modulate differently the plant responses (Trabelsi and Mhamdi, 2013). Bacterial inoculants could alter even the protist community structure. This is an important aspect in plant-bacteria interaction, once these microbial eukaryotic groups are key predators in soil and directly affect the performance of desirable microorganisms, such as PGPB (Xiong et al., 2019). In the context of mineral solubilization for crop nutrition, especially related to P solubilization, some studies described the effect of applying rock fertilizers or solubilizing strains on plant microbiota. P fertilization regimes can be the dominant factor driving bacterial community structure in soil (Wang et al., 2018). The long-term-fertilization with RP has been associated with a higher selection of P-solubilizing community in the rhizosphere than the observed effect of high soluble P fertilizers (Silva et al., 2017). The inoculation of a PSB could not lead the strain to not become predominant in the soil community; however, it can significantly change the abundance of other taxonomical groups in the rhizosphere (Liu Y.-Q. et al., 2020). Access plant-associated microbiomes structure and their functions is very strategic in an agronomical context since such microbial communities can be modulated to achieve a higher yield and a sustainable production (Andreote and Pereira E Silva, 2017). This is especially important considering global warming and how the microbiota is reacting and affecting crop responses to climate change (Dubey et al., 2019).
A specific function associated with community members from a complex microbiome can be achieved by a “deconstructing” approach. Using specific defined media and enrichment cultivation techniques direct to a functional target, an initial soil microbiota can be reduced to a low-complexity and specialized community that can be particularly studied and explored (Naylor et al., 2020). The microbiota can be directly engineered to perform a desirable function, and different approaches have been developed to achieve this including alternatives based on genetic manipulation of the microbial community (Lawson et al., 2019). Synthetic biology strategies are very promising to microbiota engineering and can be performed under a bottom-up or top-down approach. In a bottom-up approach, selected bacterial strains from the natural community can be genetically modified to carry a desirable trait (i.e., P or K solubilizing ability) and used to assemble a synthetic microbial community. In the top-down approach, desirable traits can be introduced into a range of microbial hosts in situ by gene horizontal transfer using an engineered conjugative donor strain or by bacteriophages (Ke et al., 2020). In the concern of bacterial weathering and rock fertilizers, rational microbiome design could be used to increase weathering traits in soil microbial communities or to introduce other PGP traits and genes for plant colonization/interaction into efficient soil weathering microorganisms.
Final Remarks
In the present review, we addressed rock fertilizers. They are inexpensive and environmentally friendly options for farmers. We focused on biological modification processes driven by microbial activity to improve the agronomic effectiveness of these non-conventional nutrient-bearing rock and mineral resources as fertilizers. We found a series of reports demonstrating that there is considerable potential in the combination of inoculants with rock fertilizers to increase soil fertility and crop production. We consider important to further expand our understanding of this alternative approach, in particular by providing consistent answers to key questions such as (i) what is the best inoculation rock/mineral combination for each crop? (ii) what are the parameters affecting inoculant efficacy on nutrient release from rocks and mineral fertilizers? (iii) how to maximize the weathering activity of microbial inoculants to meet the crop’s nutritional demands? and (iv) how to adapt inoculation methods and strategies to local needs considering environmental variations and socioeconomic factors?
The integrated application of microbial inoculants and rock fertilizers requires the efforts of different areas and specialists. The choice for rock resources and bacterial strains demands rigorous field-scale trials to validate agronomic effectiveness. Similarly, the extension of environmental benefits resulting from such practice must be precise and the risks must be estimated, ensuring security, productivity, and sustainability.
Statements
Author contributions
LV, CG, and BL elaborated the conception of the study. IR and CV wrote the manuscript. LV, CG, BL, and LP revised the manuscript critically. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
IR and CV received scholarships from CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Brazil).
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the support of the following agencies: CNPq and FAPERGS (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do RS).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbbasiM. K.MusaN.ManzoorM. (2015). Mineralization of soluble P fertilizers and insoluble rock phosphate in response to phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and poultry manure and their effect on the growth and P utilization efficiency of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.).Biogeosciences124607–4619. 10.5194/bg-12-4607-2015
2
Abou-el-SeoudI. I.Abdel-MegeedA. (2012). Impact of rock materials and biofertilizations on P and K availability for maize (Zea Maize) under calcareous soil conditions.Saudi J. Biol. Sci.1955–63. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2011.09.001
3
AdamoP.ViolanteP. (2000). Weathering of rocks and neogenesis of minerals associated with lichen activity.Appl. Clay Sci.16229–256. 10.1016/S0169-1317(99)00056-3
4
AdelekeR.NwangburukaC.OboirienB. (2017). Origins, roles and fate of organic acids in soils: a review.S. Afr. J. Bot.108393–406. 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.09.002
5
AdnanM.ShahZ.FahadS.ArifM.AlamM.KhanI. A.et al (2017). Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria nullify the antagonistic effect of soil calcification on bioavailability of phosphorus in alkaline soils.Sci. Rep.7:16131. 10.1038/s41598-017-16537-5
6
AfzalA.BanoA.FatimaM. (2010). Higher soybean yield by inoculation with N-fixing and P-solubilizing bacteria.Agron. Sustain. Dev.30487–495. 10.1051/agro/2009041
7
AgafonovaN. V.KaparullinaE. N.DoroninaN. V.TrotsenkoY. A. (2013). Phosphate-solubilizing activity of aerobic methylobacteria.Microbiology82864–867. 10.1134/S0026261714010020
8
AhmedE.HolmströmS. J. M. (2014). Siderophores in environmental research: roles and applications.Microb. Biotechnol.7196–208. 10.1111/1751-7915.12117
9
AhmedE.HolmströmS. J. M. (2015). Microbe–mineral interactions: the impact of surface attachment on mineral weathering and element selectivity by microorganisms.Chem. Geol.40313–23. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.03.009
10
AlaylarB.EgamberdievaD.GulluceM.KaradayiM.AroraN. K. (2020). Integration of molecular tools in microbial phosphate solubilization research in agriculture perspective.World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.36:93. 10.1007/s11274-020-02870-x
11
AliA. M.AwadM. Y. M.HegabS. A.El GawadA. M. A.EissaM. A. (2020). Effect of potassium solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus cereus) on growth and yield of potato.J. Plant Nutr.1–10. 10.1080/01904167.2020.1822399
12
AlkahtaniM. D. F.FoudaA.AttiaK. A.Al-OtaibiF.EidA. M.EwaisE. E.-D.et al (2020). Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting endophytic bacteria from desert plants and their application as bioinoculants for sustainable agriculture.Agronomy10:1325. 10.3390/agronomy10091325
13
AloriE. T.GlickB. R.BabalolaO. O. (2017). Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture.Front. Microbiol.8:971. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00971
14
AndaM.ShamshuddinJ.FauziahC. I. (2015). Improving chemical properties of a highly weathered soil using finely ground basalt rocks.Catena124147–161. 10.1016/j.catena.2014.09.012
15
AndreoteF. D.Pereira E SilvaM. C. (2017). Microbial communities associated with plants: learning from nature to apply it in agriculture.Curr. Opin. Microbiol.3729–34. 10.1016/j.mib.2017.03.011
16
AndrewsM. G.TaylorL. L. (2019). Combating climate change through enhanced weathering of agricultural soils.Elements15253–258. 10.2138/gselements.15.4.253
17
AnjanadeviI. P.JohnN. S.JohnK. S.JeevaM. L.MisraR. S. (2016). Rock inhabiting potassium solubilizing bacteria from Kerala, India: characterization and possibility in chemical K fertilizer substitution.J. Basic Microbiol.5667–77. 10.1002/jobm.201500139
18
AokiM.FujiiK.KitayamaK. (2012). Environmental control of root exudation of low-molecular weight organic acids in tropical rainforests.Ecosystems151194–1203. 10.1007/s10021-012-9575-6
19
ArcandM. M.SchneiderK. D. (2006). Plant- and microbial-based mechanisms to improve the agronomic effectiveness of phosphate rock: a review.An. Acad. Bras. Cienc.78791–807. 10.1590/S0001-37652006000400013
20
ArgawA. (2012). Evaluation of co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and phosphate solubilizing Pseudomonas spp. Effect on soybean (Glycine max L. (Merr.)) in Assossa area.J. Agr. Sci. Tech.14213–224.
21
AshfaqM.HassanH. M.GhazaliA. H. A.AhmadM. (2020). Halotolerant potassium solubilizing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria may improve potassium availability under saline conditions.Environ. Monit. Assess.192:697. 10.1007/s10661-020-08655-x
22
AzaroualS. E.HazzoumiZ.MernissiN. ElAasfarA.Meftah KadmiriI.BouizgarneB. (2020). Role of inorganic phosphate solubilizing bacilli isolated from moroccan phosphate rock mine and rhizosphere soils in wheat (Triticum aestivum L) phosphorus uptake.Curr. Microbiol.772391–2404. 10.1007/s00284-020-02046-8
23
AzconR.BareaJ. M.HaymanD. S. (1976). Utilization of rock phosphate in alkaline soils by plants inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria.Soil Biol. Biochem.8135–138. 10.1016/0038-0717(76)90078-X
24
BadrM. A.ShafeiA. M.El-DeenS. H. S. (2006). The dissolution of K and P-bearing minerals by silicate dissolving bacteria and their effect on Sorghum growth.Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci.25–11.
25
Bailey-SerresJ.ParkerJ. E.AinsworthE. A.OldroydG. E. D.SchroederJ. I. (2019). Genetic strategies for improving crop yields.Nature575109–118. 10.1038/s41586-019-1679-0
26
BakhshandehE.PirdashtiH.LendehK. S. (2017). Phosphate and potassium-solubilizing bacteria effect on the growth of rice.Ecol. Eng.103164–169. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.03.008
27
BaldottoL. E. B.SilvaL. G. J. S.CanellasL. P.OlivaresF. L.BaldottoM. A. (2012). Initial growth of maize in response to application of rock phosphate, vermicompost and endophytic bacteria.Rev. Ceres59262–270. 10.1590/S0034-737X2012000200016
28
Balogh-BrunstadZ.KellerC. K.GillR. A.BormannB. T.LiC. Y. (2008). The effect of bacteria and fungi on chemical weathering and chemical denudation fluxes in pine growth experiments.Biogeochemistry88153–167. 10.1007/s10533-008-9202-y
29
BanfieldJ. F.BarkerW. W.WelchS. A.TauntonA. (1999). Biological impact on mineral dissolution: application of the lichen model to understanding mineral weathering in the rhizosphere.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.963404–3411. 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3404
30
BarrettC. B.BevisL. E. M. (2015). The self-reinforcing feedback between low soil fertility and chronic poverty.Nat. Geosci.8907–912. 10.1038/ngeo2591
31
BasakB. B.BiswasD. R. (2009). Influence of potassium solubilizing microorganism (Bacillus mucilaginosus) and waste mica on potassium uptake dynamics by sudan grass (Sorghum vulgare Pers.) grown under two Alfisols.Plant Soil317235–255. 10.1007/s11104-008-9805-z
32
BasakB. B.BiswasD. R. (2010). Co-inoculation of potassium solubilizing and nitrogen fixing bacteria on solubilization of waste mica and their effect on growth promotion and nutrient acquisition by a forage crop.Biol. Fertil. Soils46641–648. 10.1007/s00374-010-0456-x
33
BashanN. (2016). Inoculant formulations are essential for successful inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria and business opportunities.Indian Phytopathol.69739–743.
34
BashanY.de-BashanL. E.PrabhuS. R.HernandezJ.-P. (2014). Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: formulations and practical perspectives (1998–2013).Plant Soil3781–33. 10.1007/s11104-013-1956-x
35
BashanY.KamnevA. A.de-BashanL. E. (2013a). A proposal for isolating and testing phosphate-solubilizing bacteria that enhance plant growth.Biol. Fertil. Soils491–2. 10.1007/s00374-012-0756-4
36
BashanY.KamnevA. A.de-BashanL. E. (2013b). Tricalcium phosphate is inappropriate as a universal selection factor for isolating and testing phosphate-solubilizing bacteria that enhance plant growth: a proposal for an alternative procedure.Biol. Fertil. Soils49465–479. 10.1007/s00374-012-0737-7
37
BashanY.LiC. Y.LebskyV. K.MorenoM.de-BashanL. E. (2002). Primary colonization of volcanic rocks by plants in rid Baja California, Mexico.Plant Biol.4392–402. 10.1055/s-2002-32337
38
BashanY.VierheiligH.SalazarB. G.de-BashanL. E. (2006). Primary colonization and breakdown of igneous rocks by endemic, succulent elephant trees (Pachycormus discolor) of the deserts in Baja California, Mexico.Naturwissenschaften93344–347. 10.1007/s00114-006-0111-4
39
BeerlingD. J.LeakeJ. R.LongS. P.ScholesJ. D.TonJ.NelsonP. N.et al (2018). Farming with crops and rocks to address global climate, food and soil security.Nat. Plants4138–147. 10.1038/s41477-018-0108-y
40
Ben ZinebA.TrabelsiD.AyachiI.BarhoumiF.ArocaR.MhamdiR. (2020). Inoculation with elite strains of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria enhances the effectiveness of fertilization with rock phosphates.Geomicrobiol. J.3722–30. 10.1080/01490451.2019.1658826
41
BennettE. M.CarpenterS. R.CaracoN. F. (2001). Human impact on erodable phosphorus and eutrophication: a global perspective.Bioscience51227–234. 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0227:hioepa]2.0.co;2
42
BennettP. C.RogersJ. R.ChoiW. J.HiebertF. K. (2001). Silicates, silicate weathering, and microbial ecology.Geomicrobiol. J.183–19. 10.1080/01490450151079734
43
BharwadK.RajkumarS. (2020). Modulation of PQQ-dependent glucose dehydrogenase (mGDH and sGDH) activity by succinate in phosphate solubilizing plant growth promoting Acinetobacter sp. SK2.3 Biotech10:5. 10.1007/s13205-019-1991-2
44
BiY.HesterbergD. L.DuckworthO. W. (2010). Siderophore-promoted dissolution of cobalt from hydroxide minerals.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta742915–2925. 10.1016/j.gca.2010.02.028
45
BindrabanP. S.DimkpaC.NagarajanL.RoyA.RabbingeR. (2015). Revisiting fertilisers and fertilisation strategies for improved nutrient uptake by plants.Biol. Fertil. Soils51897–911. 10.1007/s00374-015-1039-7
46
BokhariA.EssackM.LafiF. F.Andres-BarraoC.JalalR.AlamoudiS.et al (2019). Bioprospecting desert plant Bacillus endophytic strains for their potential to enhance plant stress tolerance.Sci. Rep.9:18154. 10.1038/s41598-019-54685-y
47
BorgiM. A.SaidiI.MoulaA.RhimiS.RhimiM. (2020). The attractive serratia plymuthica BMA1 strain with high rock phosphate-solubilizing activity and its effect on the growth and phosphorus uptake by Vicia faba L. Plants.Geomicrobiol. J.37437–445. 10.1080/01490451.2020.1716892
48
BoseS.HochellaM. F.Jr.GorbyY. A.KennedyD. W.McCreadyD. E.MaddenA. S.et al (2009). Bioreduction of hematite nanoparticles by the dissimilatory iron reducing bacterium Shewanella oneidensis MR-1.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta73962–976. 10.1016/j.gca.2008.11.031
49
Brazil (2013). Lei 12.890/2013 de 10 de Dezembro de 2013 – Altera a Lei no 6.894, de 16 de Dezembro de 1980. Available online at: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2013/lei/l12890.htm(accessed November 12, 2020).
50
CalvarusoC.TurpaultM.-P.Frey-KlettP. (2006). Root-associated bacteria contribute to mineral weathering and to mineral nutrition in trees: a budgeting analysis.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.721258–1266. 10.1128/aem.72.2.1258-1266.2006
51
CampbellB. M.ThorntonP.ZougmoréR.van AstenP.LipperL. (2014). Sustainable intensification: what is its role in climate smart agriculture?Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.839–43. 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.002
52
CarbonettoB.RascovanN.ÁlvarezR.MentaberryA.VázquezM. P. (2014). Structure, composition and metagenomic profile of soil microbiomes associated to agricultural land use and tillage systems in Argentine pampas.PLoS One9:e99949. 10.1371/journal.pone.0099949
53
ChaconN.SilverW. L.DubinskyE. A.CusackD. F. (2006). Iron reduction and soil phosphorus solubilization in humid tropical forests soils: the roles of labile carbon pools and an electron shuttle compound.Biogeochemistry7867–84. 10.1007/s10533-005-2343-3
54
ChandrakalaC.VoletiS. R.BandeppaS.Sunil KumarN.LathaP. C. (2019). Silicate solubilization and plant growth promoting potential of Rhizobium sp. isolated from rice rhizosphere.Silicon112895–2906. 10.1007/s12633-019-0079-2
55
ChaudharyT.DixitM.GeraR.ShuklaA. K.PrakashA.GuptaG.et al (2020). Techniques for improving formulations of bioinoculants.3 Biotech10:199. 10.1007/s13205-020-02182-9
56
ChenJ.BlumeH. P.BeyerL. (2000). Weathering of rocks induced by lichen colonization – a review.Catena39121–146. 10.1016/S0341-8162(99)00085-5
57
ChenW.YangF.ZhangL.WangJ. (2016). Organic acid secretion and phosphate solubilizing efficiency of Pseudomonas sp. PSB12: effects of phosphorus forms and carbon sources.Geomicrobiol. J.33870–877. 10.1080/01490451.2015.1123329
58
ChhabraS.BrazilD.MorrisseyJ.BurkeJ. I.O’GaraF.DowlingD. N. (2013). Characterization of mineral phosphate solubilization traits from a barley rhizosphere soil functional metagenome.Microbiologyopen2717–724. 10.1002/mbo3.110
59
CiceriD.ManningD. A. C.AllanoreA. (2015). Historical and technical developments of potassium resources.Sci. Total Environ.502590–601. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.013
60
ClineW. R. (2008). Global Warming and Agriculture: Finance Development.Washington DC: International Monetary Fund, 23–27.
61
ColeM. B.AugustinM. A.RobertsonM. J.MannersJ. M. (2018). The science of food security.NPJ Sci. Food2:14. 10.1038/s41538-018-0021-9
62
ColomboC.PalumboG.HeJ.-Z.PintonR.CescoS. (2014). Review on iron availability in soil: interaction of Fe minerals, plants, and microbes.J. Soils Sediments14538–548. 10.1007/s11368-013-0814-z
63
CooperR. (1959). Bacterial fertilizers in the Soviet Union.Soils Fertil.22327–333.
64
CostaE. M.de LimaW.Oliveira-LongattiS. M.de SouzaF. M. (2015). Phosphate-solubilising bacteria enhance Oryza sativa growth and nutrient accumulation in an oxisol fertilized with rock phosphate.Ecol. Eng.83380–385. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.06.045
65
CrespoJ. M.BoiardiJ. L.LunaM. F. (2011). Mineral phosphate solubilization activity of gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus under P-limitation and plant root environment.Agric. Sci.0216–22. 10.4236/as.2011.21003
66
CurrieH. A.PerryC. C. (2007). Silica in plants: biological, biochemical and chemical studies.Ann. Bot.1001383–1389. 10.1093/aob/mcm247
67
De WerraP.Péchy-TarrM.KeelC.MaurhoferM. (2009). Role of gluconic acid production in the regulation of biocontrol traits of Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.754162–4174. 10.1128/AEM.00295-09
68
DittaA.ImtiazM.MehmoodS.RizwanM. S.MubeenF.AzizO.et al (2018). Rock phosphate-enriched organic fertilizer with phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms improves nodulation, growth, and yield of legumes.Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.492715–2725. 10.1080/00103624.2018.1538374
69
Dominguez-NuñezJ. A.BenitoB.Berrocal-LoboM.AlbanesiA. (2016). “Mycorrhizal fungi: role in the solubilization of potassium,” in Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture, edsMeenaV. S.MauryaB. R.VermaJ. P.MeenaR. S. (New Delhi: Springer India), 77–98. 10.1007/978-81-322-2776-2_6
70
DoneyS. C.FabryV. J.FeelyR. A.KleypasJ. A. (2009). Ocean acidification: the other CO2 problem.Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci.1169–192. 10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834
71
DubeyA.MallaM. A.KhanF.ChowdharyK.YadavS.KumarA.et al (2019). Soil microbiome: a key player for conservation of soil health under changing climate.Biodivers. Conserv.282405–2429. 10.1007/s10531-019-01760-5
72
DuckworthO. W.AkafiaM. M.AndrewsM. Y.BargarJ. R. (2014). Siderophore-promoted dissolution of chromium from hydroxide minerals.Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts161348–1359. 10.1039/C3EM00717K
73
DuckworthO. W.SpositoG. (2005). Siderophore-manganese(III) interactions II. Manganite dissolution promoted by desferrioxamine B.Environ. Sci. Technol.396045–6051. 10.1021/es050276c
74
EpsteinE. (1994). The anomaly of silicon in plant biology.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.9111–17. 10.1073/pnas.91.1.11
75
EtesamiH.EmamiS.AlikhaniH. A. (2017). Potassium solubilizing bacteria (KSB): mechanisms, promotion of plant growth, and future prospects – a review.J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.17897–911. 10.4067/S0718-95162017000400005
76
FAO (2019). World Fertilizer Trends and Outlook to 2022.Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
77
FarhatM. B.FouratiA.ChouayekhH. (2013). Coexpression of the pyrroloquinoline quinone and glucose dehydrogenase genes from Serratia marcescens CTM 50650 conferred high mineral phosphate-solubilizing ability to Escherichia coli.Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.1701738–1750. 10.1007/s12010-013-0305-0
78
FayigaA. O.NwokeO. C. (2016). Phosphate rock: origin, importance, environmental impacts, and future roles.Environ. Rev.24403–415. 10.1139/er-2016-0003
79
FinlayR. D.MahmoodS.RosenstockN.Bolou-BiE. B.KöhlerS. J.FahadZ.et al (2020). Reviews and syntheses: biological weathering and its consequences at different spatial levels – from nanoscale to global scale.Biogeosciences171507–1533. 10.5194/bg-17-1507-2020
80
FormosoM. L. L. (2006). Some topics on geochemistry of weathering: a review.An. Acad. Bras. Cienc.78809–820. 10.1590/S0001-37652006000400014
81
FrancheC.LindströmK.ElmerichC. (2009). Nitrogen-fixing bacteria associated with leguminous and non-leguminous plants.Plant Soil32135–59. 10.1007/s11104-008-9833-8
82
FranksD. M. (2020). Reclaiming the neglected minerals of development.Extr. Ind. Soc.7453–460. 10.1016/j.exis.2020.02.002
83
FyfeW. S.LeonardosO. H.TheodoroS. H. (2006). Sustainable farming with native rocks: the transition without revolution.An. Acad. Bras. Cienc.78715–720. 10.1590/S0001-37652006000400007
84
GhalyA. E.RamakrishnanV. V. (2015). Nitrogen sources and cycling in the ecosystem and its role in air, water and soil pollution: a critical review.J. Pollut. Eff. Control3:136. 10.4172/2375-4397.1000136
85
GleesonD.MathesF.FarrellM.LeopoldM. (2016). Environmental drivers of soil microbial community structure and function at the Avon River Critical Zone Observatory.Sci. Total Environ.5711407–1418. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.185
86
GlickB. R. (2014). Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world.Microbiol. Res.16930–39. 10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.009
87
GodfrayH. C. J.BeddingtonJ. R.CruteI. R.HaddadL.LawrenceD.MuirJ. F.et al (2010). Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people.Science327812–818. 10.1126/science.1185383
88
GoldsteinA.LiuS. (1987). Molecular cloning and regulation of a mineral phosphate solubilizing gene from Erwinia herbicola.Nat. Biotechnol.572–74. 10.1038/nbt0187-72
89
Gómez-MerinoF. C.Trejo-TéllezL. I.AlarcónA. (2015). Plant and microbe genomics and beyond: potential for developing a novel molecular plant nutrition approach.Acta Physiol. Plant.37:208. 10.1007/s11738-015-1952-2
90
GordonS. J. (2005). Effect of environmental factors on the chemical weathering of plagioclase in Hawaiian Basalt.Phys. Geogr.2669–84. 10.2747/0272-3646.26.1.69
91
GoswamiD.ThakkerJ. N.DhandhukiaP. C. (2016). Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a review.Cogent Food Agric.2:1127500. 10.1080/23311932.2015.1127500
92
GoudaS.KerryR. G.DasG.ParamithiotisS.ShinH.-S.PatraJ. K. (2018). Revitalization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable development in agriculture.Microbiol. Res.206131–140. 10.1016/j.micres.2017.08.016
93
GroeneveltP. H.van StraatenP.RasiahV.SimpsonJ. (1989). Modifications in evaporation parameters by rock mulches.Soil Technol.2279–285. 10.1016/0933-3630(89)90012-3
94
GuiñazúL. B.AndrésJ. A.Del PapaM. F.PistorioM.RosasS. B. (2010). Response of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) to single and mixed inoculation with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and Sinorhizobium meliloti.Biol. Fertil. Soils46185–190. 10.1007/s00374-009-0408-5
95
GulatiA.SharmaN.VyasP.SoodS.RahiP.PathaniaV.et al (2010). Organic acid production and plant growth promotion as a function of phosphate solubilization by Acinetobacter rhizosphaerae strain BIHB 723 isolated from the cold deserts of the trans-Himalayas.Arch. Microbiol.192975–983. 10.1007/s00203-010-0615-3
96
GuptaM.BishtS.SinghB.GulatiA.TewariR. (2011). Enhanced biomass and steviol glycosides in Stevia rebaudiana treated with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and rock phosphate.Plant Growth Regul.65449–457. 10.1007/s10725-011-9615-9
97
HanH. S.Supanjani LeeK. D. (2006). Effect of co-inoculation with phosphate and potassium solubilizing bacteria on mineral uptake and growth of pepper and cucumber.Plant Soil Environ.52130–136. 10.17221/3356-PSE
98
HarleyA. D.GilkesR. J. (2000). Factors influencing the release of plant nutrient elements from silicate rock powders: a geochemical overview.Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.5611–36. 10.1023/A:1009859309453
99
HaynesR. J. (2014). A contemporary overview of silicon availability in agricultural soils.J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.177831–844. 10.1002/jpln.201400202
100
HeA.-L.NiuS.-Q.ZhaoQ.LiY.-S.GouJ.-Y.GaoH.-J.et al (2018). Induced salt tolerance of perennial ryegrass by a novel Bacterium strain from the rhizosphere of a desert shrub haloxylon ammodendron.Int. J. Mol. Sci.19:469. 10.3390/ijms19020469
101
HirschP.EckhardtF. E. W.PalmerR. J. (1995). Methods for the study of rock-inhabiting microorganisms–a mini review.J. Microbiol. Methods23143–167. 10.1016/0167-7012(95)00017-F
102
HuL.XiaM.LinX.XuC.LiW.WangJ.et al (2018). Earthworm gut bacteria increase silicon bioavailability and acquisition by maize.Soil Biol. Biochem.125215–221. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.07.015
103
HuangJ.LiY.FuC.ChenF.FuQ.DaiA.et al (2017). Dryland climate change: recent progress and challenges.Rev. Geophys.55719–778. 10.1002/2016RG000550
104
HuangJ.ZhangG.ZhangY.GuanX.WeiY.GuoR. (2020). Global desertification vulnerability to climate change and human activities. L.Degrad. Dev.311380–1391. 10.1002/ldr.3556
105
HuismanJ.CoddG. A.PaerlH. W.IbelingsB. W.VerspagenJ. M. H.VisserP. M. (2018). Cyanobacterial blooms.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.16471–483. 10.1038/s41579-018-0040-1
106
IllmerP.SchinnerF. (1995). Solubilization of inorganic calcium phosphates—solubilization mechanisms.Soil Biol. Biochem.27257–263. 10.1016/0038-0717(94)00190-C
107
ImranM.ShahzadS. M.ArifM. S.YasmeenT.AliB.TanveerA. (2020). Inoculation of potassium solubilizing bacteria with different potassium fertilization sources mediates maize growth and productivity.Pak. J. Agric. Sci.571045–1055. 10.21162/PAKJAS/20.9788
108
JacksonT. A. (2015). Weathering, secondary mineral genesis, and soil formation caused by lichens and mosses growing on granitic gneiss in a boreal forest environment.Geoderma2578–91. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.03.012
109
JainH. K. (2012). Transition to twenty-first century agriculture: change of direction.Agric. Res.112–17. 10.1007/s40003-011-0008-0
110
JhaY.SubramanianR. B. (2016). “Regulation of plant physiology and antioxidant enzymes for alleviating salinity stress by potassium-mobilizing bacteria,” in Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture, edsMeenaV.MauryaB.VermaJ.MeenaR. (New Delhi: Springer India), 149–162. 10.1007/978-81-322-2776-2_11
111
JhaY.SubramanianR. B.PatelS. (2011). Combination of endophytic and rhizospheric plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in Oryza sativa shows higher accumulation of osmoprotectant against saline stress.Acta Physiol. Plant33797–802. 10.1007/s11738-010-0604-9
112
JiS.-H.KimJ.-S.LeeC.-H.SeoH.-S.ChunS.-C.OhJ.et al (2019). Enhancement of vitality and activity of a plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) by atmospheric pressure non-thermal plasma.Sci. Rep.9:1044. 10.1038/s41598-018-38026-z
113
JiménezM. N.PintoJ. R.RipollM. A.Sánchez-MirandaA.NavarroF. B. (2017). Impact of straw and rock-fragment mulches on soil moisture and early growth of holm oaks in a semiarid area.Catena152198–206. 10.1016/j.catena.2017.01.021
114
JohnR. P.TyagiR. D.BrarS. K.SurampalliR. Y.PrévostD. (2011). Bio-encapsulation of microbial cells for targeted agricultural delivery.Crit. Rev. Biotechnol.31211–226. 10.3109/07388551.2010.513327
115
Kaleem AbbasiM.ManzoorM. (2018). Biosolubilization of phosphorus from rock phosphate and other P fertilizers in response to phosphate solubilizing bacteria and poultry manure in a silt loam calcareous soil.J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.181345–356. 10.1002/jpln.201800012
116
KalevS. D.ToorG. S. (2018). “The composition of soils and sediments,” in Green Chemistry, edsTörökB.DransfieldT. (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 339–357. 10.1016/B978-0-12-809270-5.00014-5
117
KangS. M.WaqasM.ShahzadR.YouY. H.AsafS.KhanM. A.et al (2017). Isolation and characterization of a novel silicate-solubilizing bacterial strain Burkholderia eburnea CS4-2 that promotes growth of japonica rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Dongjin).J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.63233–241. 10.1080/00380768.2017.1314829
118
KaurG.ReddyM. S. (2015). Effects of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, rock phosphate and chemical fertilizers on maize-wheat cropping cycle and economics.Pedosphere25428–437. 10.1016/S1002-0160(15)30010-2
119
KavamuraV. N.SantosS. N.da SilvaJ. L.ParmaM. M.ÁvilaL. A.ViscontiA.et al (2013). Screening of Brazilian cacti rhizobacteria for plant growth promotion under drought.Microbiol. Res.168183–191. 10.1016/j.micres.2012.12.002
120
KeJ.WangB.YoshikuniY. (2020). Microbiome engineering: synthetic biology of plant-associated microbiomes in sustainable agriculture.Trends Biotechnol.xx1–18. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.07.008
121
KellerC.GuntzerF.BarboniD.LabreucheJ.MeunierJ. D. (2012). Impact of agriculture on the Si biogeochemical cycle: input from phytolith studies.C. R. Geosci.344739–746. 10.1016/j.crte.2012.10.004
122
KellyE. F.ChadwickO. A.HilinskiT. (1998). The effect of plants on mineral weathering.Biogeochemistry4221–53. 10.1023/A:1005919306687
123
KemmlingA.KomperM.FliesC.SchieweckO.HoppertM. (2004). Biofilms and extracellular matrices on geomaterials.Environ. Geol.46429–435. 10.1007/s00254-004-1044-x
124
KhanA.SinghP.SrivastavaA. (2018). Synthesis, nature and utility of universal iron chelator – Siderophore: a review.Microbiol. Res.212–213103–111. 10.1016/j.micres.2017.10.012
125
KimK. Y.JordanD.KrishnanH. B. (1997). Rahnella aquatilis, a bacterium isolated from soybean rhizosphere, can solubilize hydroxyapatite.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.153273–277. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb12585.x
126
KourD.RanaK. L.KaurT.SheikhI.YadavA. N.KumarV.et al (2020a). Microbe-mediated alleviation of drought stress and acquisition of phosphorus in great millet (Sorghum bicolour L.) by drought-adaptive and phosphorus-solubilizing microbes.Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol.23:101501. 10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101501
127
KourD.RanaK. L.KaurT.YadavN.HalderS. K.YadavA. N.et al (2020b). “Potassium solubilizing and mobilizing microbes: biodiversity, mechanisms of solubilization, and biotechnological implication for alleviations of abiotic stress,” in New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering, edsRastegariA. A.YadavA. N.YadavN. (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 177–202. 10.1016/B978-0-12-820526-6.00012-9
128
KourD.RanaK. L.SheikhI.KumarV.YadavA. N.DhaliwalH. S.et al (2020c). Alleviation of drought stress and plant growth promotion by Pseudomonas libanensis EU-LWNA-33, a drought-adaptive phosphorus-solubilizing bacterium.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci.90785–795. 10.1007/s40011-019-01151-4
129
KrishnarajP.GoldsteinA. (2001). Cloning of a Serratia marcescens DNA fragment that induces quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase-mediated gluconic acid production in Escherichia coli in the presence of stationary phase Serratia marcescens.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.205215–220. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10950.x
130
KumarC.YadavK.ArchanaG.Naresh KumarG. (2013). 2-Ketogluconic acid secretion by incorporation of Pseudomonas putida KT 2440 gluconate dehydrogenase (gad) operon in Enterobacter asburiae PSI3 improves mineral phosphate solubilization.Curr. Microbiol.67388–394. 10.1007/s00284-013-0372-z
131
LawsonC. E.HarcombeW. R.HatzenpichlerR.LindemannS. R.LöfflerF. E.O’MalleyM. A.et al (2019). Common principles and best practices for engineering microbiomes.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.17725–741. 10.1038/s41579-019-0255-9
132
LazoD. E.DyerL. G.AlorroR. D. (2017). Silicate, phosphate and carbonate mineral dissolution behaviour in the presence of organic acids: a review.Miner. Eng.100115–123. 10.1016/j.mineng.2016.10.013
133
LeonardosO. H.FyfeW. S.KronbergB. I. (1987). The use of ground rocks in laterite systems: an improvement to the use of conventional soluble fertilizers?Chem. Geol.60361–370. 10.1016/0009-2541(87)90143-4
134
LeonardosO. H.TheodoroS. H.AssadM. L. (2000). Remineralization for sustainable agriculture: a tropical perspective from a Brazilian viewpoint.Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.563–9. 10.1023/A:1009855409700
135
LewisW. H.TahonG.GeesinkP.SousaD. Z.EttemaT. J. G. (2020). Innovations to culturing the uncultured microbial majority.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.1–16. 10.1038/s41579-020-00458-8
136
LeyvalC.BerthelinJ. (1989). Interactions between Laccaria laccata, Agrobacterium radiobacter and beech roots: influence on P, K, Mg, and Fe mobilization from minerals and plant growth.Plant Soil117103–110. 10.1007/BF02206262
137
LiY.ZhangQ.WanG.HuangR.PiaoH.BaiL.et al (2006). Physical mechanisms of plant roots affecting weathering and leaching of loess soil.Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci.491002–1008. 10.1007/s11430-006-1002-4
138
LiermannL. J.GuynnR. L.AnbarA.BrantleyS. L. (2005). Production of a molybdophore during metal-targeted dissolution of silicates by soil bacteria.Chem. Geol.220285–302. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.04.013
139
LindströmK.MousaviS. A. (2020). Effectiveness of nitrogen fixation in rhizobia.Microb. Biotechnol.131314–1335. 10.1111/1751-7915.13517
140
LiuJ.QiW.LiQ.WangS.-G.SongC.YuanX. (2020). Exogenous phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria changed the rhizosphere microbial community indirectly.3 Biotech10:164. 10.1007/s13205-020-2099-4
141
LiuY.-Q.WangY.-H.KongW.-L.LiuW.-H.XieX.-L.WuX.-Q. (2020). Identification, cloning and expression patterns of the genes related to phosphate solubilization in Burkholderia multivorans WS-FJ9 under different soluble phosphate levels.AMB Express10:108. 10.1186/s13568-020-01032-4
142
LompoF.BationoA.SedogoM. P.BadoV. B.HienV.OuattaraB. (2018). “Role of local agro-minerals in mineral fertilizer recommandations for crops: examples of some West Africa phosphate rocks,” in Improving the Profitability, Sustainability and Efficiency of Nutrients Through Site Specific Fertilizer Recommendations in West Africa Agro-Ecosystems, edsBationoA.NgaradoumD.YoulS.LompoF.FeningJ. O. (Cham: Springer), 157–180. 10.1007/978-3-319-58789-9_9
143
LopezB. R.BacilioM. (2020). Weathering and soil formation in hot, dry environments mediated by plant–microbe interactions.Biol. Fertil. Soils56447–459. 10.1007/s00374-020-01456-x
144
LucasY. (2001). The role of plants in controlling rates and products of weathering: importance of biological pumping.Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.29135–163. 10.1146/annurev.earth.29.1.135
145
LuyckxM.HausmanJ. F.LuttsS.GuerrieroG. (2017). Silicon and plants: current knowledge and technological perspectives.Front. Plant Sci.8:411. 10.3389/fpls.2017.00411
146
ManningD. A. C. (2010). Mineral sources of potassium for plant nutrition. A review.Agron. Sustain. Dev.30281–294. 10.1051/agro/2009023
147
ManningD. A. C. (2018). Innovation in resourcing geological materials as crop nutrients.Nat. Resour. Res.27217–227. 10.1007/s11053-017-9347-2
148
ManningD. A. C.TheodoroS. H. (2020). Enabling food security through use of local rocks and minerals.Extr. Ind. Soc.7480–487. 10.1016/j.exis.2018.11.002
149
MarraL. M.de OliveiraS. M.SoaresC. R. F. S.de MoreiraF. M. S. (2011). Solubilisation of inorganic phosphates by inoculant strains from tropical legumes.Sci. Agric.68603–609. 10.1590/S0103-90162011000500015
150
Mendoza-ArroyoG. E.Chan-BacabM. J.Aguila-RamírezR. N.Ortega-MoralesB. O.Canché SolísR. E.Chab-RuizA. O.et al (2020). Inorganic phosphate solubilization by a novel isolated bacterial strain Enterobacter sp. ITCB-09 and its application potential as biofertilizer.Agriculture10:383. 10.3390/agriculture10090383
151
MenkinaR. (1963). Bacterial fertilizers and their importance for agricultural plants.Microbiology32297–301.
152
MpangaI.NkebiweP.KuhlmannM.CozzolinoV.PiccoloA.GeistlingerJ.et al (2019). The form of N supply determines plant growth promotion by P-solubilizing microorganisms in maize.Microorganisms7:38. 10.3390/microorganisms7020038
153
MusarratJ.KhanM. S. (2014). “Factors affecting phosphate-solubilizing activity of microbes: current status,” in Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms, edsKhanM. S.ZaidiA.MusarratJ. (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 63–85. 10.1007/978-3-319-08216-5_3
154
NacoonS.JogloyS.RiddechN.MongkolthanarukW.KuyperT. W.BoonlueS. (2020). Interaction between phosphate solubilizing bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth promotion and tuber inulin content of Helianthus tuberosus L.Sci. Rep.10:4916. 10.1038/s41598-020-61846-x
155
NaylorD.FanslerS.BrislawnC.NelsonW. C.HofmockelK. S.JanssonJ. K.et al (2020). Deconstructing the soil microbiome into reduced-complexity functional modules.MBio111–19. 10.1128/mBio.01349-20
156
NeijsselO. M.TempestD. W.PostmaP. W.DuineJ. A.JznJ. F. (1983). Glucose metabolism by K+-limited Klebsiella aerogenes: evidence for the involvement of a quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.2035–39. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1983.tb00085.x
157
OginoC. M.Costa JuniorG.PopovaN. D.Martines FilhoJ. G. (2021). Poder de compra, preço e consumo de fertilizantes minerais: uma análise para o centro-oeste brasileiro.Rev. Econ. Sociol. Rural59:e220367. 10.1590/1806-9479.2021.220367
158
OlijveW.KokJ. J. (1979). Analysis of growth of Gluconobacter oxydans in glucose containing media.Arch. Microbiol.121283–290. 10.1007/BF00425069
159
ParmarP.SindhuS. (2013). Potassium solubilization by rhizosphere bacteria: influence of nutritional and environmental conditions.AJMR325–31.
160
PramanikP.GoswamiA. J.GhoshS.KalitaC. (2019). An indigenous strain of potassium-solubilizing bacteria Bacillus pseudomycoides enhanced potassium uptake in tea plants by increasing potassium availability in the mica waste-treated soil of North-east India.J. Appl. Microbiol.126215–222. 10.1111/jam.14130
161
PriyonoJ.GilkesR. J. (2004). Dissolution of milled-silicate rock fertilisers in the soil.Soil Res.42441. 10.1071/SR03138
162
PuenteM.BashanY.LiC.LebskyV. (2004a). Microbial populations and activities in the rhizoplane of rock−weathering desert plants. I. Root colonization and weathering of igneous rocks.Plant Biol.6629–642. 10.1055/s-2004-821100
163
PuenteM.LiC.BashanY. (2004b). Microbial populations and activities in the rhizoplane of rock−weathering desert plants. II. Growth promotion of cactus seedlings.Plant Biol.6643–650. 10.1055/s-2004-821101
164
RajapakshaC. P.SenanayakeA. P. (2011). Potential use of rock-phosphate-solubilizing bacteria associated with wild rice as inoculants for improved rice (Oryza sativa).Arch. Agron. Soil Sci.57775–788. 10.1080/03650340.2010.493878
165
RamankuttyN.MehrabiZ.WahaK.JarvisL.KremenC.HerreroM.et al (2018). Trends in global agricultural land use: implications for environmental health and food security.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.69789–815. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040256
166
RanalliG.ZanardiniE.SorliniC. (2019). “Biodeterioration – including cultural heritage,” in Encyclopedia of Microbiology, 4th Edn., ed.SchmidtT. M. (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 491–509. 10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.13016-X
167
ReitemeierR. (1951). Soil potassium.Adv. Agron.3113–164.
168
RichterD.deB.OhN. H.FimmenR.JacksonJ. (2007). “The rhizosphere and soil formation,” in The Rhizosphere an Ecological Perspective, edsCardonZ. G.WhitbeckJ. L. (Cambridge, MA: Elsevier), 179–200. 10.1016/B978-012088775-0/50010-0
169
RivasR.TrujilloM. E.SánchezM.MateosP. F.Martínez-MolinaE.VelázquezE. (2004). Microbacterium ulmi sp. nov., a xylanolytic, phosphate-solubilizing bacterium isolated from sawdust of Ulmus nigra.Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.54513–517. 10.1099/ijs.0.02724-0
170
RobertM.BerthelinJ. (1986). “Role of biologicaland biochemical factors in soil mineral weathering,” in Interactions of Soil Minerals with Natural Organics and Microbes, edsHuangP. M.SchnitzerM. (Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America), 453–495. 10.2136/sssaspecpub17.c12
171
RodriguezH.GonzalezT.GoireI.BashanY. (2004). Gluconic acid production and phosphate solubilization by the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum spp.Naturwissenschaften91552–555. 10.1007/s00114-004-0566-0
172
Rojas-SolisD.Vences-GuzmánM. ÁSohlenkampC.SantoyoG. (2020). Antifungal and plant growth–promoting bacillus under saline stress modify their membrane composition.J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.201549–1559. 10.1007/s42729-020-00246-6
173
Rojas-TapiasD.Moreno-GalvánA.Pardo-DíazS.ObandoM.RiveraD.BonillaR. (2012). Effect of inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) on amelioration of saline stress in maize (Zea mays).Appl. Soil Ecol.61264–272. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.01.006
174
RolfeS. A.GriffithsJ.TonJ. (2019). Crying out for help with root exudates: adaptive mechanisms by which stressed plants assemble health-promoting soil microbiomes.Curr. Opin. Microbiol.4973–82. 10.1016/j.mib.2019.10.003
175
RosierA.MedeirosF. H. V.BaisH. P. (2018). Defining plant growth promoting rhizobacteria molecular and biochemical networks in beneficial plant-microbe interactions.Plant Soil42835–55. 10.1007/s11104-018-3679-5
176
SaadM. M.EidaA. A.HirtH. (2020). Tailoring plant-associated microbial inoculants in agriculture: a roadmap for successful application.J. Exp. Bot.713878–3901. 10.1093/jxb/eraa111
177
SaeidA.ProchownikE.Dobrowolska-IwanekJ. (2018). Phosphorus solubilization by Bacillus species.Molecules23:2897. 10.3390/molecules23112897
178
SafariM.MotamediE.Kari DolatabadH.Modarres SanavyS. A. M. (2020). Nano-carriers effects on the viability and efficiency of Pseudomonas strains as phosphate solubilizing bacteria.Heliyon6:e05076. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05076
179
SamavatS.MafakheriS.ShakouriM. J. (2012). Promoting common bean growth and nitrogen fixation by the co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates.Bulg. J. Agric. Sci.18387–395.
180
SammauriaR.KumawatS.KumawatP.SinghJ.JatwaT. K. (2020). Microbial inoculants: potential tool for sustainability of agricultural production systems.Arch. Microbiol.202677–693. 10.1007/s00203-019-01795-w
181
SamuelsT.BryceC.LandenmarkH.Marie−LoudonC.NicholsonN.StevensA. H.et al (2020). “Microbial weathering of minerals and rocks in natural environments,” in Biogeochemical Cycles: Ecological Drivers and Environmental Impact, edsDontsovaK.Balogh-BrunstadZ.Le RouxG. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons), 59–79. 10.1002/9781119413332.ch3
182
SangeethK. P.BhaiR. S.SrinivasanV. (2012). Paenibacillus glucanolyticus, a promising potassium solubilizing bacterium isolated from black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) rhizosphere.J. Spices Aromat. Crop.21118–124.
183
SarhanM. S.HamzaM. A.YoussefH. H.PatzS.BeckerM.ElSaweyH.et al (2019). Culturomics of the plant prokaryotic microbiome and the dawn of plant-based culture media – a review.J. Adv. Res.1915–27. 10.1016/j.jare.2019.04.002
184
SarikhaniM. R.KhoshruB.GreinerR. (2019). Isolation and identification of temperature tolerant phosphate solubilizing bacteria as a potential microbial fertilizer.World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.35:126. 10.1007/s11274-019-2702-1
185
SarikhaniM. R.OustanS.EbrahimiM.AliasgharzadN. (2018). Isolation and identification of potassium-releasing bacteria in soil and assessment of their ability to release potassium for plants.Eur. J. Soil Sci.691078–1086. 10.1111/ejss.12708
186
SashidharB.PodileA. R. (2010). Mineral phosphate solubilization by rhizosphere bacteria and scope for manipulation of the direct oxidation pathway involving glucose dehydrogenase.J. Appl. Microbiol.1091–12. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04654.x
187
SattarA.NaveedM.AliM.ZahirZ. A.NadeemS. M.YaseenM.et al (2019). Perspectives of potassium solubilizing microbes in sustainable food production system: a review.Appl. Soil Ecol.133146–159. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.09.012
188
SchoebitzM.CeballosC.CiampiL. (2013). Effect of immobilized phosphate solubilizing bacteria on wheat growth and phosphate uptake.J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.131–10.
189
SchulzS.BrankatschkR.DümigA.Kögel-KnabnerI.SchloterM.ZeyerJ. (2013). The role of microorganisms at different stages of ecosystem development for soil formation.Biogeosciences103983–3996. 10.5194/bg-10-3983-2013
190
SelvakumarG.JoshiP.SuyalP.MishraP. K.JoshiG. K.VenugopalanR.et al (2013). Rock phosphate solubilization by psychrotolerant Pseudomonas spp. and their effect on lentil growth and nutrient uptake under polyhouse conditions.Ann. Microbiol.631353–1362. 10.1007/s13213-012-0594-5
191
SetiawatiT. C.MutmainnahL. (2016). Solubilization of potassium containing mineral by microorganisms from sugarcane rhizosphere.Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia9108–117. 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.134
192
SharmaS. B.SayyedR. Z.TrivediM. H.GobiT. A. (2013). Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils.Springerplus2:587. 10.1186/2193-1801-2-587
193
ShengX. F.HeL. Y. (2006). Solubilization of potassium-bearing minerals by a wild-type strain of Bacillus edaphicus and its mutants and increased potassium uptake by wheat.Can. J. Microbiol.5266–72. 10.1139/w05-117
194
SilvaU. C.MedeirosJ. D.LeiteL. R.MoraisD. K.Cuadros-OrellanaS.OliveiraC. A.et al (2017). Long-term rock phosphate fertilization impacts the microbial communities of maize rhizosphere.Front. Microbiol.8:1266. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01266
195
SinghG.BiswasD. R.MarwahaT. S. (2010). Mobilization of potassium from waste mica by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and its assimilation by maize (Zea mays) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): a hydroponics study under phytotron growth chamber.J. Plant Nutr.331236–1251. 10.1080/01904161003765760
196
SmithK. S.FerryJ. G. (2000). Prokaryotic carbonic anhydrases.FEMS Microbiol.24335–366. 10.1016/S0168-6445(00)00030-9
197
SonH.-J.ParkG.-T.ChaM.-S.HeoM.-S. (2006). Solubilization of insoluble inorganic phosphates by a novel salt- and pH-tolerant Pantoea agglomerans R-42 isolated from soybean rhizosphere.Bioresour. Technol.97204–210. 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.021
198
SonT. T. N.DiepC. N.GiangT. T. M.ThuT. T. A. (2007). Effect of co-inoculants (Bradyrhizobia and phosphate solubilizing bacteria) liquid on soybean under rice based cropping system in the Mekong Delta.Omonrice143135–143.
199
SpaepenS.VanderleydenJ. (2011). Auxin and plant-microbe interactions.Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.3:a001438. 10.1101/cshperspect.a001438
200
SparksD.HuangP. (1985). “Physical chemistry of soil potassium,” in Potassium in Agriculture, ed.MunsonR. D. (Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America), 201–276. 10.2134/1985.potassium.c9
201
SpringmannM.ClarkM.Mason-D’CrozD.WiebeK.BodirskyB. L.LassalettaL.et al (2018). Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits.Nature562519–525. 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0
202
SrideviM.MallaiahK. (2009). Phosphate solubilization by Rhizobium strains.Indian J. Microbiol.4998–102. 10.1007/s12088-009-0005-1
203
StewartW. M.DibbD. W.JohnstonA. E.SmythT. J. (2005). The contribution of commercial fertilizer nutrients to food production.Agron. J.971–6. 10.2134/agronj2005.0001
204
SugumaranP.JanarthanamB. (2007). Solubilization of potassium-containing minerals by bacteria and their effect on plant growth.World J. Agric. Sci.3350–355.
205
SunF.OuQ.WangN.xuan GuoZ.OuY.LiN.et al (2020). Isolation and identification of potassium-solubilizing bacteria from Mikania micrantha rhizospheric soil and their effect on M. micrantha plants.Glob. Ecol. Conserv.23:e01141. 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01141
206
SundaraB.NatarajanV.HariK. (2002). Influence of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria on the changes in soil available phosphorus and sugarcane and sugar yields.Field Crops Res.7743–49. 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00048-5
207
SuriV. K.ChoudharyA. K. (2013). Glycine–Glomus–phosphate solubilizing bacteria interactions lead to fertilizer phosphorus economy in soybean in a Himalayan acid alfisol.Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.443020–3029. 10.1080/00103624.2013.829085
208
SyersJ. K.JohnstonA. E.CurtinD. (2008). Efficiency of Soil and Fertilizer Phosphorus Use:Report No. 18. Rome: FAO Fertilizer and plant nutrition bulletin.
209
TanZ. X.LalR.WiebeK. D. (2005). Global soil nutrient depletion and yield reduction.J. Sustain. Agric.26123–146. 10.1300/J064v26n01_10
210
TariqM.NomanM.AhmedT.HameedA.ManzoorN.ZafarM. (2017). Antagonistic features displayed by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a review.J. Plant Sci. Phytopathol.138–43. 10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001004
211
TaurianT.AnzuayM. S.LudueñaL. M.AngeliniJ. G.MuñozV.ValettiL.et al (2013). Effects of single and co-inoculation with native phosphate solubilising strain Pantoea sp J49 and the symbiotic nitrogen fixing bacterium Bradyrhizobium sp SEMIA 6144 on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) growth.Symbiosis5977–85. 10.1007/s13199-012-0193-z
212
TimilsenaY. P.AdhikariR.CaseyP.MusterT.GillH.AdhikariB. (2015). Enhanced efficiency fertilisers: a review of formulation and nutrient release patterns.J. Sci. Food Agric.951131–1142. 10.1002/jsfa.6812
213
TorresM. A.WestA. J.NealsonK. (2014). Microbial acceleration of olivine dissolution via siderophore production.Procedia Earth Planet. Sci.10118–122. 10.1016/j.proeps.2014.08.041
214
TrabelsiD.MhamdiR. (2013). Microbial inoculants and their impact on soil microbial communities: a review.Biomed. Res. Int.2013:863240. 10.1155/2013/863240
215
TrippB. C.SmithK.FerryJ. G. (2001). Carbonic anhydrase: new insights for an ancient enzyme.J. Biol. Chem.27648615–48618. 10.1074/jbc.R100045200
216
TripuraC.SashidharB.PodileA. R. (2007). Ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis–enhanced mineral phosphate solubilization by groundnut-associated Serratia marcescens GPS-5.Curr. Microbiol.5479–84. 10.1007/s00284-005-0334-1
217
TrivediP.SaT. (2008). Pseudomonas corrugata (NRRL B-30409) mutants increased phosphate solubilization, organic acid production, and plant growth at lower temperatures.Curr. Microbiol.56140–144. 10.1007/s00284-007-9058-8
218
UrozS.CalvarusoC.TurpaultM.-P.Frey-KlettP. (2009). Mineral weathering by bacteria: ecology, actors and mechanisms.Trends Microbiol.17378–387. 10.1016/j.tim.2009.05.004
219
UrozS.IoannidisP.LengelleJ.CébronA.MorinE.BuéeM.et al (2013). Functional assays and metagenomic analyses reveals differences between the microbial communities inhabiting the soil horizons of a Norway Spruce plantation.PLoS One8:e55929. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055929
220
UrozS.KellyL. C.TurpaultM.-P.LepleuxC.Frey-KlettP. (2015). The mineralosphere concept: mineralogical control of the distribution and function of mineral-associated bacterial communities.Trends Microbiol.23751–762. 10.1016/j.tim.2015.10.004
221
Van StraatenP. (2002). Rocks for Crops: Agrominerals of Sub-Saharan Africa.Nairobi: International Centre for Research in Agroforestry.
222
Van StraatenP. (2006). Farming with rocks and minerals: challenges and opportunities.An. Acad. Bras. Cienc.78731–747. 10.1590/S0001-37652006000400009
223
VandiekenV.MussmannM.NiemannH.JørgensenB. B. (2006). Desulfuromonas svalbardensis sp. nov. and Desulfuromusa ferrireducens sp. nov., psychrophilic, Fe (III)-reducing bacteria isolated from Arctic sediments, Svalbard.Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.561133–1139. 10.1099/ijs.0.63639-0
224
VargasL. K.VolpianoC. G.LisboaB. B.GiongoA.BeneduziA.PassagliaL. M. P. (2017). “Potential of rhizobia as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria,” in Microbes for Legume Improvement, edsZaidiA.KhanM.MusarratJ. (Cham: Springer), 10.1007/978-3-319-59174-2_7
225
VartoukianS. R.PalmerR. M.WadeW. G. (2010). Strategies for culture of ‘unculturable’ bacteria.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.3091–7. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02000.x
226
VassilevN.VassilevaM.MartosV.Garcia del MoralL. F.KowalskaJ.TylkowskiB.et al (2020). Formulation of microbial inoculants by encapsulation in natural polysaccharides: focus on beneficial properties of carrier additives and derivatives.Front. Plant Sci.11:270. 10.3389/fpls.2020.00270
227
VerbonE. H.LibermanL. M. (2016). Beneficial microbes affect endogenous mechanisms controlling root development.Trends Plant Sci.21218–229. 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.01.013
228
VermeulenS. J.CampbellB. M.IngramJ. S. I. (2012). Climate change and food systems.Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.37195–222. 10.1146/annurev-environ-020411-130608
229
Vives-PerisV.de OllasC.Gómez-CadenasA.Pérez-ClementeR. M. (2020). Root exudates: from plant to rhizosphere and beyond.Plant Cell Rep.393–17. 10.1007/s00299-019-02447-5
230
VogelE.DonatM. G.AlexanderL. V.MeinshausenM.RayD. K.KarolyD.et al (2019). The effects of climate extremes on global agricultural yields.Environ. Res. Lett.14:054010. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab154b
231
VolpianoC. G.LisboaB. B.São JoséJ. F. B.de OliveiraA. M. R.BeneduziA.PassagliaL. M. P.et al (2018). Rhizobium strains in the biological control of the phytopathogenic fungi Sclerotium (Athelia) rolfsii on the common bean.Plant Soil432229–243. 10.1007/s11104-018-3799-y
232
WaghJ.ChanchalK.SonalS.PraveenaB.ArchanaG.KumarG. N. (2016). Inoculation of genetically modified endophytic Herbaspirillum seropedicae Z67 endowed with gluconic and 2-ketogluconic acid secretion, confers beneficial effects on rice (Oriza sativa) plants.Plant Soil40951–64. 10.1007/s11104-016-2937-7
233
WaghJ.ShahS.BhandariP.ArchanaG.KumarG. N. (2014). Heterologous expression of pyrroloquinoline quinone (pqq) gene cluster confers mineral phosphate solubilization ability to Herbaspirillum seropedicae Z67.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.985117–5129. 10.1007/s00253-014-5610-1
234
WalpolaB. C.HettiarachchiR. H. A. N. (2020). Organic manure amended with phosphate solubilizing bacteria on soil phosphorous availability.J. Agric. Sci. Sri Lanka15:142. 10.4038/jas.v15i2.8796
235
WangQ.WangR.HeL.ShengX. (2017). Location-related differences in weathering behaviors and populations of culturable rock-weathering bacteria along a hillside of a rock mountain.Microb. Ecol.73838–849. 10.1007/s00248-016-0921-7
236
WangX.ZhaoC.MüllerC.WangC.CiaisP.JanssensI.et al (2020). Emergent constraint on crop yield response to warmer temperature from field experiments.Nat. Sustain.3908–916. 10.1038/s41893-020-0569-7
237
WangY.ZhaoX.GuoZ.JiaZ.WangS.DingK. (2018). Response of soil microbes to a reduction in phosphorus fertilizer in rice-wheat rotation paddy soils with varying soil P levels.Soil Tillage Res.181127–135. 10.1016/j.still.2018.04.005
238
WaniP.KhanM.ZaidiA. (2007). Co-inoculation of nitrogen-fixing and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria to promote growth, yield and nutrient uptake in chickpea.Acta Agron. Hung.55315–323. 10.1556/AAgr.55.2007.3.7
239
WeiY.ZhaoY.ShiM.CaoZ.LuQ.YangT.et al (2018). Effect of organic acids production and bacterial community on the possible mechanism of phosphorus solubilization during composting with enriched phosphate-solubilizing bacteria inoculation.Bioresour. Technol.247190–199. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.092
240
WilsonM. J. (2004). Weathering of the primary rock-forming minerals: processes, products and rates.Clay Miner.39233–266. 10.1180/0009855043930133
241
XiaoL.HaoJ.WangW.LianB.ShangG.YangY.et al (2014). The up-regulation of carbonic anhydrase genes of Bacillus mucilaginosus under soluble Ca2+ deficiency and the heterologously expressed enzyme promotes calcite dissolution.Geomicrobiol. J.31632–641. 10.1080/01490451.2014.884195
242
XiaoY.WangX.ChenW.HuangQ. (2017). Isolation and identification of three potassium-solubilizing bacteria from rape rhizospheric soil and their effects on Ryegrass.Geomicrobiol. J.34873–880. 10.1080/01490451.2017.1286416
243
XiongW.LiR.GuoS.KarlssonI.JiaoZ.XunW.et al (2019). Microbial amendments alter protist communities within the soil microbiome.Soil Biol. Biochem.135379–382. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.05.025
244
Yaghoubi KhanghahiM.PirdashtiH.RahimianH.NematzadehG. A.Ghajar SepanlouM. (2018). Nutrient use efficiency and nutrient uptake promoting of rice by potassium solubilizing bacteria (KSB).Cereal Res. Commun.46739–750. 10.1556/0806.46.2018.042
245
YiY.HuangW.GeY. (2008). Exopolysaccharide: a novel important factor in the microbial dissolution of tricalcium phosphate.World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.241059–1065. 10.1007/s11274-007-9575-4
246
YuX.LiuX.ZhuT. H.LiuG. H.MaoC. (2012). Co-inoculation with phosphate-solubilzing and nitrogen-fixing bacteria on solubilization of rock phosphate and their effect on growth promotion and nutrient uptake by walnut.Eur. J. Soil Biol.50112–117. 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.01.004
247
ZaharescuD. G.BurgheleaC. I.DontsovaK.ReinhardC. T.ChoroverJ.LybrandR. (2020). “Biological weathering in the terrestrial system,” in Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series, edsDontsovaK.Balogh-BrunstadZ.Le RouxG. (Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union), 1–32. 10.1002/9781119413332.ch1
248
ZaidiA.KhanM. S. (2006). Co-inoculation effects of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms and Glomus fasciculatum on green gram-Bradyrhizobium.Turk. J. Agric. For.30223–230. 10.3906/tar-0509-15
249
ZaidiA.KhanM. S.MusarratJ. (2017). in Microbes for Legume Improvement, edsZaidiA.KhanM. S.MusarratJ. (Cham: Springer International Publishing). 10.1007/978-3-319-59174-2
250
ZavarzinaD. G.ChistyakovaN. I.ShapkinA. V.SavenkoA. V.ZhilinaT. N.KevbrinV. V.et al (2016). Oxidative biotransformation of biotite and glauconite by alkaliphilic anaerobes: the effect of Fe oxidation on the weathering of phyllosilicates.Chem. Geol.43998–109. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.06.015
251
ZengQ.WuX.WangJ.DingX. (2017). Phosphate solubilization and gene expression of phosphate-solubilizing bacterium Burkholderia multivorans WS-FJ9 under different levels of soluble phosphate.J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.27844–855. 10.4014/jmb.1611.11057
252
ZengQ.WuX.WenX. (2016). Effects of soluble phosphate on phosphate-solubilizing characteristics and expression of gcd Gene in Pseudomonas frederiksbergensis JW-SD2.Curr. Microbiol.72198–206. 10.1007/s00284-015-0938-z
253
ZhangA. M.ZhaoG. Y.GaoT. G.WangW.LiJ.ZhangS. F.et al (2013). Solubilization of insoluble potassium and phosphate by Paenibacillus kribensis CX-7: a soil microorganism with biological control potential.AJMR741–47. 10.5897/AJMR12.1485
254
ZhangC.KongF. (2014). Isolation and identification of potassium-solubilizing bacteria from tobacco rhizospheric soil and their effect on tobacco plants.Appl. Soil Ecol.8218–25. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.05.002
255
ZhaoK.PenttinenP.ZhangX.AoX.LiuM.YuX.et al (2014). Maize rhizosphere in Sichuan, China, hosts plant growth promoting Burkholderia cepacia with phosphate solubilizing and antifungal abilities.Microbiol. Res.16976–82. 10.1016/j.micres.2013.07.003
256
ZhaoS.ZhouN.ZhaoZ.-Y.ZhangK.WuG.-H.TianC.-Y. (2016). Isolation of endophytic plant growth-promoting bacteria associated with the halophyte Salicornia europaea and evaluation of their promoting activity under salt stress.Curr. Microbiol.73574–581. 10.1007/s00284-016-1096-7
257
ZhengB. X.DingK.YangX. R.WadaanM. A. M.HozzeinW. N.PeñuelasJ.et al (2019). Straw biochar increases the abundance of inorganic phosphate solubilizing bacterial community for better rape (Brassica napus) growth and phosphate uptake.Sci. Total Environ.6471113–1120. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.454
258
ZhengB. X.HaoX.-L.DingK.ZhouG.-W.ChenQ.-L.ZhangJ.-B.et al (2017). Long-term nitrogen fertilization decreased the abundance of inorganic phosphate solubilizing bacteria in an alkaline soil.Sci. Rep.7:42284. 10.1038/srep42284
259
ZhuY.DuanG.ChenB.PengX.ChenZ.SunG. (2014). Mineral weathering and element cycling in soil-microorganism-plant system.Sci. China Earth Sci.57888–896. 10.1007/s11430-014-4861-0
Summary
Keywords
biological weathering, crushed rocks, plant growth-promotion, fertilizers, inoculants
Citation
Ribeiro IDA, Volpiano CG, Vargas LK, Granada CE, Lisboa BB and Passaglia LMP (2020) Use of Mineral Weathering Bacteria to Enhance Nutrient Availability in Crops: A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 11:590774. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.590774
Received
02 August 2020
Accepted
26 November 2020
Published
11 December 2020
Volume
11 - 2020
Edited by
Victoria Fernandez, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain
Reviewed by
Gilberto de Oliveira Mendes, Federal University of Uberlândia, Brazil; Michael Campbell, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Ribeiro, Volpiano, Vargas, Granada, Lisboa and Passaglia.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Luciano Kayser Vargas, luciano-kayser@agricultura.rs.gov.br
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Plant Nutrition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.