Plants and phytophagous arthropods have shared more than 400 million years of evolution. Consequently, both adversaries have developed physical and chemical barriers to protect against each other. They have not only modified their metabolic pathways and physiology but have also adapted behavior habits, to finally maintain a growth-defense trade-off which ensures their survival. Many publications have appeared in the last years, particularly focusing on the molecular aspects associated with the defense and counter-defense processes involved in the plant-pest relationship (reviewed by Santamaria et al., 2018, 2020; Stahl et al., 2018; Erb and Reymond, 2019).
This Research Topic is addressed in a special issue on plant-pest interactions which has been divided into three volumes based on the pest order. Volume I is dedicated to Acari and thrips, a group of pest species small in size but with a great impact on agricultural production worldwide (Migeon and Dorkeld, 2006–2021; Wu et al., 2018; Sperotto et al., 2019). Although phylogenetically distant, Acari and thrips have two essential characteristics in common: (i) the feeding mode mediated by a stylet which facilitates sucking from mesophyll or epidermal cells (Kindt et al., 2003; Bensoussan et al., 2016), and (ii) the ability to develop resistance to pesticides used to control them (van Leeuwen and Dermauw, 2016; Steenbergen et al., 2018). The six articles included in Volume I add novel insights at the physiological and molecular levels on plant-Acari/thrip interactions as well as new experimental procedures to work with these pests.
Among thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) is the most intensively studied species because it causes direct damage by feeding on a wide range of crops and acts as an important transmitter of viral diseases (Rotenberg and Whitfield, 2018; Rotenberg et al., 2020). It is the most efficient vector of the tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), which is ranked in the top 10 most important plant viruses worldwide. Previous data had reported that as a consequence of the TSWV transmission, indirect or plant-mediated effects were produced on the vector-plant interaction, by altering plant physiology and benefiting vector fitness (Ogada et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2019). In this research context, Nachappa et al. investigated the tomato-mediated molecular mechanisms underlying the TSWV-F. occidentalis relationship. Microarray assays performed in tomato, mock or systemically-infected with TSWV and subsequently infested with or without thrips, revealed that TSWV is the main driver of the plant responses. Either TSWV alone or in combination with thrips suppressed genes involved in host primary metabolism, altered the expression of genes associated with hormone defense signaling, and upregulated genes involved in protein metabolism. Consequently, the total free amino acid content was increased and plants became more suitable hosts for thrips. So, the dual attack compromised plant health and defenses.
Spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) are the most economically important group of phytophagous mites leading to serious agricultural losses all over the world. Defenses developed by plants against spider mites have been widely investigated in model and crop species in the last decades. Most studies have compared transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data derived from infested susceptible and resistant accessions/cultivars to identify key genes/proteins/molecules with altered abundance via spider mite infestation (Zhurov et al., 2014; Hoseinzadeh et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). The article published by Weinblum et al. combines transcriptome and metabolome analyses to obtain a comprehensive insight into the defense responses of domesticated tomato cultivars against the polyphagous spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Results revealed changes in genes associated with primary and secondary metabolism, including hormones and volatiles. The major significant differences dealt with monoterpenoid and phenylpropanoid volatiles induced in infested resistant cultivars, which were consistent with transcriptomic data. Olfactory choice bioassays with Phytoseiulus persimilis, a predator of mites, showed exclusive attraction for infested resistant tomatoes which corroborated the defense role of these metabolites. Other aspects of the plant-mite relationship were studied by Jiwuba et al. who evaluated 60 cassava genotypes across different environments on the resistance of the cassava green mite Mononychellus tanajoa (Tetranychidae), and their effects on cassava yields in Nigeria. The end goal was to determine their adaptability and find genotypes that could be potentially recommended for cultivation. They identified four cassava genotypes that were more stable and resistant to M. tanjana, which combined with useful agronomic traits could be selected as preferred cassava genotypes to be adopted by farmers. This is practical work to provide superior cassava plants, considered as an essential staple food and animal feed in tropical and sub-tropical Africa.
In an article reported by Ghazy et al. a new method is described that uses a sheet-like structure to mimic plant leaves for delivering experimental solutions to stylet-feeding arthropods. The flexibility of the method was tested with three acarine and one aphid species and allowed large-scale screens of active ingredients and/or pesticides for pest control.
A systematic review by Garcia et al. presented a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of induced plant defenses produced upon pest feeding on plant fitness and surrogate parameters. The information on defense-growth trade-offs is of great help to the scientific community for the design of pest management strategies and reducing costs.
Finally, a perspective article by Arnaiz et al. compiles the current, although still limited knowledge, on nitric oxide (NO), either as a signal molecule, a metabolic intermediate, or a toxic oxidative product in the generation of plant defenses against insects and plant feeding mites, and particularly in T. urticae, as well as the contribution of other molecules associated with NO metabolic pathways.
The information reported in Volume I on plant-pest interaction has enlarged the knowledge on the plant-Acari/thrip interplay, and has added new experimental methods and novel perspectives, but further research is required to obtain full understanding-driven sustainable control against a diverse range of pest mites and thrips.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
ID wrote the editorial with contributions from all GB, FO, TS, GS, and CB. All authors acted as co-editors of this special issue and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We greatly appreciate all authors who contributed to the articles included in this special issue as well as to the collaborating reviewers.
Conflict of interest
CB was employed by company KeyGene. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
BensoussanN.SantamariaM. E.ZhurovV.DiazI.GrbicM.GrbicV. (2016). Plant-herbivore interaction: dissection of the cellular pattern of Tetranychus urticae feeding on the host plant. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1105. 10.3389/fpls.2016.01105
2
ErbM.ReymondP. (2019). Molecular interactions between plants and insect herbivores. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 70, 527–557. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-095910
3
HoseinzadehA. H.SoorniA.ShoorooeiM.MahaniM. T.AmiriR. M.AllahyariH.et al. (2020). Comparative transcriptome provides molecular insight into defense-associated mechanisms against spider mite in resistant and susceptible common bean cultivars. PLoS ONE15:e0228680. 10.1371/journal.pone.0228680
4
KindtF.JoostenN. N.PetersD.TjallingiiW. F. (2003). Characterisation of the feeding behaviour of western flower thrips in terms of electrical penetration graph (EPG) waveforms. J. Insect Physiol. 49, 183–191. 10.1016/S0022-1910(02)00255-X
5
MigeonA.DorkeldF. (2006–2021). Spider Mites Web: A Comprehensive Database for the Tetranychidae.Montpellier: Institute for Agronomy Research; The Center for Biology and Management of Populations. Available online at: www.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/spmweb
6
OgadaP. A.MaissE.PoehlingH. M. (2013). Influence of tomato spotted wilt virus on performance and behaviour of western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis). J. Appl. Entomol. 137, 488–498. 10.1111/jen.12023
7
RotenbergD.BaumannA. A.Ben-MahmoudS. B.ChristiaensO.DermauwW.IonniadisP.et al. (2020). Genome-enabled insights into the biology of thrips as crop pests. BMC Biol. 18:142. 10.1186/s12915-020-00862-9
8
RotenbergD.WhitfieldA. E. (2018). Molecular interactions between tospoviruses and thrip vectors. Curr. Opin. Virol. 33, 191–197. 10.1016/j.coviro.2018.11.007
9
SantamariaM. E.ArnaizA.Gonzalez-MelendiP.MartinezM.DiazI. (2018). Plant perception and short-term responses to phytophagous insects and mites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19:1356. 10.3390/ijms19051356
10
SantamariaM. E.ArnaizA.Rosa-DiazI.Gonzalez-MelendiP.Romero-HernandezG.Ojeda-MartinezD. A.et al. (2020). Plant defenses against Tetranychus urticae: mind the gaps. Plants9:464. 10.3390/plants9040464
11
SperottoR. A.GrbicV.PappasM. L.LeissK. A.KantM. R.WilsonC. R.et al. (2019). Plant responses to phytophagous mites/thrips and search for resistance. Front. Plant Sci. 10:866. 10.3389/fpls.2019.00866
12
StahlE.HilfikerO.ReymondP. (2018). Plant-arthropod interactions: who is the winner?Plant J. 93, 703–728. 10.1111/tpj.13773
13
SteenbergenA.Abd-el-HaliemA.BleekerP.DickeM.Escobar-BravoR.ChengG.et al. (2018). Thrips advisor: exploiting thrips-induced defences to combat pest on crops. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 1837–1848. 10.1093/jxb/ery060
14
van LeeuwenT.DermauwW. (2016). The molecular evolution of xenobiotic metabolism and resistance in chelicerate mites. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 61, 475–498. 10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023907
15
WuS.TangL.ZhangX.XingZ.LeiZ.GaoY. (2018). A decade of a thrips invasion in China: lessons learned. Ecotoxicology27, 1032–1038. 10.1007/s10646-017-1864-6
16
WuX.XuS.ZhaoP.ZhangX.YaoX.SunY.et al. (2019). The Orthotospovirus nonstructural protein NSs suppresses plant MYC-regulated jasmonate signaling leading to enhanced vector attraction and performance. PLoS Pathog. 15:e1007897. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007897
17
ZhangY.BouwmeesterH. J.KappersI. F. (2020). Combined transcriptome and metabolome analysis identifies defence responses in spider mite-infested pepper (Capsicum annuum). J. Exp. Bot. 71, 330–343. 10.1093/jxb/erz422
18
ZhurovV.NavarroM.BruinsmaK. A.ArbonaV.SantamariaM. E.CazauxM.et al. (2014). Reciprocal responses in the interaction between Arabidopsis and the cell-content-feeding chelicerate herbivore spider mite. Plant Physiol. 164, 384–399. 10.1104/pp.113.231555
Summary
Keywords
acari, thrips, plant defense, resistance, multiple interactions
Citation
Broufas G, Ortego F, Suzuki T, Smagghe G, Broekgaarden C and Diaz I (2022) Editorial: Plant-Pest Interactions Volume I: Acari and Thrips. Front. Plant Sci. 12:773439. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.773439
Received
09 September 2021
Accepted
28 October 2021
Published
12 January 2022
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited and reviewed by
José DÃaz, University of A Coruña, Spain
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Broufas, Ortego, Suzuki, Smagghe, Broekgaarden and Diaz.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Isabel Diaz i.diaz@upm.es
This article was submitted to Plant Pathogen Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.