Abstract
The extragynoecial compitum formed by the incomplete fusion of carpel margins, while allowing intercarpellary growth of pollen tubes in apocarpous angiosperms, may also increase the risk of reproductive interference caused by heterospecific pollen (HP) deposition. In Sagittaria, congeneric HP tubes grow via different paths and enter the ovules later than conspecific pollen (CP) tubes. However, it is unclear how the growth advantage of the CP tube helps ensure reproductive success when HP is deposited on the stigmas. We performed molecular characterization of interspecies-pollinated seeds to examine the consequences of interspecific pollen deposition between Sagittaria pygmaea and S. trifolia. We also conducted CP–HP (1:1) mixed pollination and delayed CP pollination treatments to explore the seed-siring abilities of CP and HP. Our results showed that although HP could trigger the development of fruits, the interspecies-pollinated seeds contained partially developed embryos and could not germinate. More than 70% of the embryos in these seeds were molecularly identified as hybrids of both species, suggesting that HP tubes could enter the ovules and fertilize the egg cells. Moreover, CP could sire more offspring (≥70%) after the CP–HP (1:1) mixed pollination treatment, even when HP reached the stigma 0.5–1 h earlier than CP (≥50%). Following adequate CP vs. HP (1:1) pollination on carpels on two sides of the apocarpous gynoecium, both species produced > 70% conspecific seeds, indicating that the CP tubes could occupy ovules that should be occupied by HP via the extragynoecial compitum. Our results reveal that in Sagittaria, pollen deposition from co-existing congeneric heterospecies leads to interspecific seed discounting. However, the CP advantage mediated by the extragynoecial compitum is an effective strategy to mitigate the effects of interspecific pollen deposition. This study improves our understanding of how apocarpous angiosperms with an extragynoecial compitum can maintain species stability and mitigate the negative reproductive interference effect from sympatrically distributed related species.
Introduction
When pollinators visit co-flowering and co-occurring plant species alternately, pollen from one species may be transferred to another (Morales and Traveset, 2008). Interspecific pollen transfer is often considered a form of reproductive interference that reduces the reproductive success of at least one species involved (Waser, 1978; Campbell, 1985; Mitchell et al., 2009; Muchhala and Thomson, 2012; Moreira-Hernández and Muchhala, 2019). Recent evidences suggest that interspecific pollen transfer is common in natural communities and that heterospecific pollen (HP) loads can vary considerably in size and composition (Ashman and Arceo-Gomez, 2013; Fang and Huang, 2013; Emer et al., 2015; Tur et al., 2016; Lopes et al., 2021). HP can reduce the reproductive success of recipient plants in different ways, such as stigma clogging (Galen and Gregory, 1989), stigma closure (Waser and Fugate, 1986), pollen allelopathy (Thomson et al., 1982), and stylar clogging (Randall and Hilu, 1990). Furthermore, HP deposition on closely related species is more likely to cause the abortion of seeds or whole fruits (Wang and Cruzan, 1998; Fishman and Wyatt, 1999; Wolf et al., 2001; Montgomery et al., 2010; Liao et al., 2019), failure of seed germination (Natalis and Wesselingh, 2012), or production of unfit or sterile offspring (Goodwillie and Ness, 2013), as stigmas of closely related species usually provide a relatively suitable environment for pollen germination than distantly related ones (Martin, 1970).
Intercarpellary pollen-tube growth is common in several apocarpous angiosperms, including Illicium, Kadsura, Schisandra, Sedum, Sagittaria, and Ranalisma (Williams et al., 1993; Wang et al., 2002, 2006, 2012; Lyew et al., 2007; Du and Wang, 2012; Huang and Wang, 2017). It has been reported that a number of apocarpous angiosperms have an extragynoecial compitum that allows pollen tubes to grow between the free carpels of the gynoecium and thereby may have the potential to increase fruit/seed set (Endress, 1980, 1982, 1995; Endress and Igersheim, 1997, 2000; Renner et al., 1997; Lyew et al., 2007; Endress and Doyle, 2009; Wang et al., 2012). In some apocarpous species, the extragynoecial compitum is formed by the incomplete fusion of the carpel margins; this leaves an opening that allows pollen tubes to exit the ovary to reach unfertilized ovules in other carpels after penetrating the stigma surface (Williams et al., 1993; Wang et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2006; Lyew et al., 2007; Du and Wang, 2012; Wang et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2014). However, the incomplete fusion of the carpel margins may also provide more opportunities for HP tubes to enter ovaries and occupy ovules when HP—especially those from closely related species—are deposited on stigmas. For example, Lyu et al. (2017) found that HP tubes of congeneric plants can enter the ovules in adjacent carpels through the basal opening of the carpel for fertilization. Consequently, the incomplete fusion of the carpel margins can increase the risk of reproductive interference. Since the discovery of extragynoecial compitum and intercarpellary pollen-tube growth in apocarpous angiosperms, research has focused on their potential to improve the quantity and quality of offspring. Wang et al. (2002) demonstrated that in Sagittaria potamogetifolia, the reallocation of pollen tubes among pistils in the gynoecium could lead to the fertilization of unpollinated ovules. Du and Wang (2012) found that the intercarpellary growth of pollen tubes could significantly increase the fruit set after comparing the developed carpel ratio and pollinated carpel ratio in flowers from natural populations in Schisandra sphenanthera. In contrast, studies on the potential risks in terms of reproductive interference are lacking.
Conspecific pollen (CP) may have some advantages over HP, which may mitigate the risk of reproductive interference caused by HP deposition under natural conditions. Previous research has shown that CP achieves more successful ovule fertilization via faster pollen germination, faster pollen tube growth, or an increased ability to reach the micropyle and complete fertilization (Howard, 1999; Chapman et al., 2005; Brock, 2009; Montgomery et al., 2010; Zhong et al., 2019). Lyu et al. (2017) compared the growth patterns of CP tubes and HP tubes after controlled pollination between Sagittaria pygmaea and S. trifolia, and found that CP tubes tended to directly enter the ovules, whereas HP tubes preferred passing through the basal opening of the carpel to enter ovules in other carpels; the resulting HP tubes reached the ovule with a delay of approximately 1 h. However, although the above experiments reveal a growth advantage for CP tubes in S. pygmaea and S. trifolia, it cannot be concluded that this advantage can reduce reproductive interference caused by HP deposition, because previous studies in other taxa have shown that CP tube growth advantage does not always lead to conspecific seed-siring advantage. Diaz and Macnair (1999) and Song et al. (2002) found agreement between CP tube growth advantage and conspecific seed-siring advantage in Mimulus guttatus and rice. However, Montgomery et al. (2010) found that although Silene dioica showed a conspecific advantage for pollen-tube elongation, it did not show a conspecific siring advantage after mixed-species pollinations. Thus, mixed pollination experiments are necessary to determine whether a conspecific seed-siring advantage exists in both S. pygmaea and S. trifolia.
Since the discovery of intercarpellary pollen-tube growth, its role in improving fruit or seed sets has received considerable research attention. However, the question of how plants with an extragynoecial compitum maintain interspecific isolation and avoid reproductive interference has been neglected. The discovery of the growth advantage of CP tubes after interspecific pollination in Sagittaria is exciting in this regard. As such, the following questions deserve further study: (1) does the incomplete fusion of carpel margins lead to more severe reproductive interference following pollen deposition from closely related species? and (2) is the growth advantage of CP tubes mediated by different growth paths, thus effectively avoiding the effect of interspecific pollen deposition? To answer these questions, we performed hand-pollination experiments in two Sagittaria species (S. pygmaea and S. trifolia) and used molecular analysis to verify the paternity of the seeds produced. The aim of this study was to examine the potential risk of interspecific pollen deposition in sympatric apocarpous species and elucidate the role of the growth advantage of CP in maintaining species stability and ensuring reproductive success.
Materials and methods
Plant materials and study site
Sagittaria pygmaea and S. trifolia (Alismataceae) are monoecious aquatic herbs widely distributed in Asia that are often found growing around marshes, wetlands, and rice fields. Both species are field weeds in the main rice-growing areas in China, and their flowering period is from May to November (Chen, 1989). Both male and female flowers bloom in the morning and are only open for a single day. Female flowers contain a gynoecium with numerous carpels (approximately 100 in S. pygmaea and approximately 400 in S. trifolia), and each carpel has a single ovule. Both species are self-compatible and are pollinated by insects such as flies, bees, and syrphids. The pollen of both species is morphologically indistinguishable under a light microscope. By staining the pollen grains with safranin dye (1% water solution), pollen transfer can be tracked in arrays of potted plants. Using this technique, we detected interspecific pollen deposition on the stigmas of the female flowers of both species (Supplementary Figures 1, 2).
In 2018, we planted approximately 100 and 40 seedlings of S. pygmaea and S. trifolia, respectively. These seedlings were collected from monospecific populations in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China (30°28′N, 114°20′E). We cultivated the seedlings with daily watering and fertilizer application once every 2 weeks in an outdoor experimental site at Wuhan University (30°32′31″N, 114°22′2#x2033;E).
Examination of pollen tube growth
To examine whether HP tubes can grow into ovules and whether their growth path differs from that of CP tubes, we monitored the routes of pollen tube growth. In total, we collected 5–6 female flowers subjected to intraspecific and interspecific crosses with S. pygmaea and S. trifolia as maternal parents, respectively. After 1.5 and 3 h, each female flower was fixed with formalin–acetic acid–alcohol (FAA) (5:5:90 formalin–acetic acid–70% ethanol, v/v), softened with NaOH (10%) until most of the tissue was transparent, rinsed with distilled water, and then stained with aniline blue (0.1% in 1/30 mol l–1 K3PO4) for 2 h (Wang et al., 2002). The stained styles and ovaries were mounted on slides and observed under a fluorescence microscope (BX43F; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Seed set and viability measurement
We conducted hand-pollination experiments to investigate the effect of interspecific pollen deposition between S. pygmaea and S. trifolia. Pollinations were carried out from August to September in 2019 and 2020. We used approximately 140 individuals (approximately 100 S. pygmaea and 40 S. trifolia) as pollen recipients, and all the plants available during the pollination treatments were used as pollen donors. Each newly opened female flower of the day was randomly assigned one of the two pollination treatments. In total, for S. pygmaea, 30 female flowers were subjected to interspecific hand pollination and 32 female flowers to intraspecific hand pollination. For S. trifolia, 15 female flowers were subjected to interspecific hand pollination and 15 female flowers to intraspecific hand pollination.
For each pollination treatment, pollen was collected and pooled from 3 to 5 plants per species by gently tapping a fully opened male flower over a Petri dish to release the pollen. Hand pollinations were performed between 07:30 and 09:30 h using a small paintbrush loaded with fresh pollen grains to evenly brush the entire gynoecium. After 2–3 weeks, we collected the mature aggregate fruits, counted the carpels per aggregate fruit, and peeled off the pericarp and seed coat to observe the morphology of embryos under a stereoscope (SZX2-ILLT; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). In addition, mature fruits and seeds were photographed with a digital camera (DMC-GX85; Panasonic, Osaka, Japan). The height (longitudinal dimension) and width (longest transverse dimension) of the aggregate fruits (60 from S. pygmaea and 73 from S. trifolia) and achenes (60 from S. pygmaea and 120 from S. trifolia) were measured using a digital caliper and ImageJ 2.1.0 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States), respectively. To compare germination rates, we sowed 700 seeds obtained from intraspecific (150 from S. pygmaea and 200 from S. trifolia) and interspecific (150 from S. pygmaea and 200 from S. trifolia) crosses. All seeds were cold-stratified, moved to a growth chamber (25°C) to germinate, and monitored for signs of germination over 14 days.
Molecular identification of the progeny
To verify whether the unfilled seeds produced by interspecific pollination resulted from successful fertilization by HP tubes entering the ovule, we performed molecular analysis of 53 unfilled seeds (31 from S. pygmaea and 22 from S. trifolia). To determine whether the filled seeds (with U-shaped embryos) were a result of fertilization from CP tubes, we performed molecular analysis of 48 filled seeds obtained from conspecific pollination (20 in total; 10 from S. pygmaea and 10 from S. trifolia) and mixed pollination (28 in total; 16 from S. pygmaea and 12 from S. trifolia). DNA was extracted from the leaf tissue of parent plants (10 in total; five from S. pygmaea and five from S. trifolia) using a DNA extraction kit (Kangwei Century, Jiangsu, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each seed was carefully stripped of its seed coat under a stereomicroscope and transferred into 0.2-ml Eppendorf tubes for DNA extraction. Each embryo was tested as a separate sample. Because the embryos from Sagittaria were very small (filled embryos, approximately 0.1–0.4 mg each; unfilled embryos, approximately 0.04 mg each), we used a slightly modified Chelex-100 method (HwangBo et al., 2009) to extract the embryonic DNA. The embryos were homogenized with a pipette tip in 20 μl of 5% chelex-100 for 1 min, incubated in 56°C water for 30 min, incubated in boiling water for 8 min, and finally centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was used as the template for PCR amplification.
The nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (nrITS) sequences of all sampled specimens (111) were amplified using the ITS4 and ITS5 primers (White et al., 1990). The PCR conditions were the same as those reported by Liao et al. (2016). The PCR products were purified using electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel, from which the products were recovered with a DNA Gel Recovery Kit (Tsingke Biological Technology, Beijing, China). Considering the possible heterogeneity within ITS sequences, we performed a T-A cloning step for ITS PCR products using the pClone007 Versatile Simple Vector Kit (Tsingke Biological Technology, Beijing, China). Approximately 10–20 positive bacterial colonies were sequenced for each individual. All DNA sequences were assembled and aligned using Mega7 (Kumar et al., 2016), and variable sites and haplotypes were obtained using the DnaSP 5.0 program (Rozas et al., 2003).
Hand-pollination to detect interspecific pollen competition
We used hand-pollination experiments to assess whether CP had a seed-siring advantage over HP. During the flowering peak from July to September in 2019 and 2020, we performed the following four pollination treatments: (1) adequate CP and HP (1:1) mixed pollination (the total number of pollen grains was approximately 5–10 times the number of carpels); (2) inadequate CP and HP (1:1) mixed pollination (the total number of pollen grains was approximately equal to the number of carpels; (3) half-and-half pollination with CP and HP (one half of the gynoecium was pollinated with adequate CP and the other half with HP) (Figure 1); (4) delayed CP pollination (the gynoecium was pollinated first with HP, and then with CP after 0, 0.5, 1, and 2 h). Before pollination treatments, we carefully checked the stigma surface to ensure that there was no pollen deposition on the stigma.
FIGURE 1
Diagram of mixed pollination (A,C) and half-and-half pollination (B,D) pollen distribution with Sagittaria pygmaea(A,B) and S. trifolia(C,D) as maternal parent, respectively. The orange circles represent S. pygmaea pollen and yellow circles represent S. trifolia pollen, but do not represent the actual pollen size.
For each pollination treatment, pollen was collected and pooled from 3 to 5 plants per species by gently tapping a fully opened male flower over a Petri dish to release the pollen. Hand pollinations were performed between 07:30 and 09:30 h using a small paintbrush loaded with fresh pollen grains. Before conducting the experiments, we verified that the brush collected ∼50–70 pollen grains per dip under a microscope in the laboratory. Therefore, the number of pollen grains applied was estimated according to the number of times the brush was used to collect pollen. We used approximately 140 individuals (approximately 100 S. pygmaea and 40 S. trifolia) as pollen recipients, and all the plants available during the pollination treatments were used as pollen donors. Each newly opened female flower of the day was randomly assigned one of the four pollination treatments. In total, for S. pygmaea, 30–34 flowers were selected for each treatment. For S. trifolia, 15–16 flowers were selected for each treatment. Approximately 2–3 weeks after pollination, we harvested the fruits, counted the carpels per aggregate fruit under a stereomicroscope, and peeled the pericarp and seed coat to count the seeds containing embryos of different shapes.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 26.0 (Chicago, IL, United States). We used t-tests to compare the proportion of filled seeds sired by S. pygmaea and S. trifolia with the expected proportion based on the proportion of CP in the mixture (50%) or the proportion of CP pollinated carpels on all carpels (50%). Differences in the mean proportions of filled seeds among different treatments were analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Scheffe’s test. Prior to these analyses, Levene’s test was used to check for homogeneity of variances, and the data were checked for normality.
Results
Pollen tube growth
Sagittaria pygmaea pollen germinated and successfully entered the ovule of S. trifolia and vice versa. However, compared to CP tubes that directly turn toward the ovules, HP tubes tended to exit from the carpel through the basal outlet and eventually enter ovules in other carpels. Pollen-tube growth routes after conspecific and heterospecific pollinations are shown in Figure 2.
FIGURE 2
Pollen tube growth in the pistils of Sagittaria pygmaea and S. trifolia after conspecific and heterospecific pollination observed under a fluorescence microscope. (A) Pollen tubes of S. pygmaea arriving at the base of the carpel, with one of them entering into the micropyle at 1.5 h after conspecific pollination. (B) Pollen tubes of S. trifolia arriving at the base of the S. pygmaea carpels at 1.5 h after heterospecific pollination. (C) Pollen tubes of S. trifolia passed through the basal carpel opening enter into other unfertilized ovules at 3 h after heterospecific pollination. (D) Pollen tubes of S. trifolia arriving at the base of the carpel, with one of them entering into the micropyle at 1.5 h after conspecific pollination. (E) Pollen tubes of S. pygmaea arriving at the S. trifolia base of the carpel at 1.5 h after heterospecific pollination (F) pollen tubes of S. pygmaea passed through the basal carpel opening enter into other unfertilized ovules at 3 h after heterospecific pollination. White arrowheads denote pollen tubes. Ov, ovule; Scale bar: 200 μm.
Seed set after conspecific/heterospecific pollination
All hand pollinations performed on plants of S. pygmaea and S. trifolia using CP and HP led to fruit development. Although hybrid fruits resembled intraspecific-pollinated fruits in size and morphology (Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 1), their embryos were partially developed. Stereomicroscopic observations of intraspecific crosses showed that 90.62 ± 1.96% (S. pygmaea) and 80.44 ± 1.15% (S. trifolia) of the seeds contained a well-developed U-shaped embryo (Figures 3A-3,C-3; termed filled seeds). In contrast, only 0.47 ± 0.20% (S. pygmaea) and 0.39 ± 0.22% (S. trifolia) of the seeds from interspecific crosses contained U-shaped embryos. Moreover, 78.77 ± 2.50% (S. pygmaea) and 61.15 ± 2.40% (S. trifolia) of the seeds derived from interspecific crosses contained partially developed embryos (Figures 3B-3,D-3; termed unfilled seeds). In addition, with both S. pygmaea and S. trifolia as female parents, a certain proportion of partly enlarged, or flat, carpels did not show clear signs of containing an embryo in both conspecific and heterospecific pollinations. On average, 10% (S. pygmaea) and 76% (S. trifolia) of the seeds derived from intraspecific fruits germinated, and none of the hybrid seeds germinated.
FIGURE 3
Aggregated fruits and achenes resulting from conspecific pollination and reciprocal crosses of Sagittaria pygmaea and S. trifolia, as well as images of mature seeds and embryos obtained from inside the conspecific-pollinated and interspecific-pollinated fruits. All crosses are female × male. (A)S. pygmaea × S. pygmaea.(B)S. pygmaea × S. trifolia.(C)S. trifolia × S. trifolia.(D)S. trifolia × S. pygmaea. 1, 2, and 3 represent aggregate fruits, achenes, and seeds and embryos, respectively. Scale bar: 2 mm.
Identification of conspecific/heterospecific offspring
The nrITS sequences had a total aligned length of 671 bp with 28 fixed nucleotide substitutions and indels, distinguishing S. pygmaea sequences from S. trifolia at the species level (Supplementary Table 2). Overall, 71.0% (S. pygmaea) and 77.3% (S. trifolia) of the seeds produced by heterospecific pollinations exhibited additive polymorphisms between the two parent species at the 28 sites (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2). The nrITS data revealed that these seeds have nrITS sequence types of both S. pygmaea and S. trifolia, suggesting that they are the result of HP tubes entering the ovules and fertilizing the egg cells. Furthermore, 29.0% (S. pygmaea) and 22.7% (S. trifolia) of the seeds produced by heterospecific pollinations exhibited polymorphisms at some sites or no polymorphisms (Supplementary Table 2). These seeds should also be hybrid offspring, but the presence of concerted evolution of the nrITS may result in the combination of two parents in the ITS sequence of the hybrids or the complete loss of one parent’s gene (Aguilar et al., 1999). There were no polymorphisms in the nrITS sequences of all tested filled seeds (with U-shaped embryos) produced by conspecific or mixed pollination (Supplementary Table 2), suggesting that the filled seeds resulted from CP-fertilized ovules. Thus, in this study, the proportion of filled seeds (filled seeds/total seeds) was used to estimate CP reproductive success after mixed pollination.
TABLE 1
| Treatment | Seed type | No. of seeds for identification | No. of seeds contain ITS sequences of both S. pygmaea and S. trifolia | Percentage of hybrid seeds (%) |
| S. pygmaea (♀) | ||||
| Conspecific pollination | Filled seeds | 10 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Mixed pollination | Filled seeds | 16 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Heterospecific pollination | Unfilled seeds | 31 | 22 | 71.0 |
| S. trifolia (♀) | ||||
| Conspecific pollination | Filled seeds | 10 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Mixed pollination | Filled seeds | 12 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Heterospecific pollination | Unfilled seeds | 22 | 17 | 77.3 |
Molecular characterization of seeds between Sagittaria pygmaea and S. trifolia obtained from hand-pollination treatments.
Seed-siring advantage of conspecific pollen over heterospecific pollen
Sagittaria pygmaea and S. trifolia produced 78.07 ± 2.01% and 83.29 ± 2.56% filled seeds in the adequate CP–HP (1:1) mixed pollination treatment, respectively, which significantly differed from the expected 50% (Table 2; S. pygmaea, t = 13.94, p < 0.001; S. trifolia, t = 13.00, p < 0.001). When the total number of CP and HP grains was reduced to be equal to the number of carpels, the proportion of filled seeds decreased but remained above 50% (Table 2; S. pygmaea, t = 6.36, p < 0.001; S. trifolia, t = 17.50, p < 0.001). These results suggest an advantage of CP for seed-siring. In the half-and-half pollination treatment with CP and HP, the proportion of filled seeds was 70.95 ± 1.69% and 74.94 ± 1.21% in S. pygmaea and S. trifolia, respectively, which were significantly higher than the expected value of 50% based on the number of pollinated carpels (Table 2; S. pygmaea, t = 12.41, p < 0.001; S. trifolia, t = 20.60, p < 0.001). These results suggest that the CP advantage is associated with intercarpellary pollen tube growth. When HP was applied before CP, the proportion of filled seeds decreased with increasing time interval between HP application and CP application at the stigma and the proportion of filled seeds differed significantly among the four treatments [Figure 4; one-way ANOVA, S. pygmaea, F(3,120) = 16.570, p < 0.001; S. trifolia, F(3,57) = 54.517, p < 0.001]. In S. pygmaea, the proportion of filled seeds was close to 50% (49.93 ± 3.74%) when CP application was delayed by 0.5 h. However, in S. trifolia, the proportion of filled seeds was maintained at 76.27 ± 4.01% even when CP application was delayed by 1 h. In addition, compared with the CP–HP (1:1) mixed pollination treatment with adequate amounts of pollen grains, the HP–CP successive pollination treatment showed a low proportion of filled seeds (S. pygmaea, 61.91 ± 2.96%, t = 4.51, p < 0.001; S. trifolia, 75.64 ± 2.92%, t = 1.74, p = 0.094). Therefore, the seed-siring advantage of CP may be underestimated in these treatments due to the spatial barrier created by HP on the stigma.
TABLE 2
| Treatment | N | Average carpel number per aggregate fruit | Carpels without seeds/Total carpels (%) | Carpels with unfilled seeds/Total carpels (%) | Carpels with filled seeds/Total carpels (%) | Filled seeds/Total seeds (%) |
| S. pygmaea (♀) | ||||||
| CP only | 32 | 128.22 ± 6.21 | 6.07 ± 1.83 | 3.31 ± 0.70 | 90.62 ± 1.96 | 96.40 ± 0.76 |
| HP only | 30 | 101.23 ± 3.96 | 20.76 ± 2.45 | 78.77 ± 2.50 | 0.47 ± 0.20 | 0.68 ± 0.30 |
| Mix (adequate) | 30 | 105.40 ± 6.13 | 14.20 ± 2.83 | 18.34 ± 1.61 | 67.46 ± 2.94 | 78.07 ± 2.01*** |
| Mix (inadequate) | 34 | 93.38 ± 5.11 | 30.87 ± 3.39 | 20.52 ± 2.05 | 48.61 ± 3.51 | 68.87 ± 2.97*** |
| Half-and-half | 34 | 125.94 ± 4.30 | 11.65 ± 1.88 | 25.55 ± 1.51 | 62.80 ± 2.11 | 70.95 ± 1.69*** |
| S. trifolia (♀) | ||||||
| CP only | 15 | 455.40 ± 39.62 | 16.48 ± 1.25 | 3.09 ± 0.37 | 80.44 ± 1.15 | 96.33 ± 0.43 |
| HP only | 15 | 432.67 ± 55.63 | 38.46 ± 2.39 | 61.15 ± 2.40 | 0.39 ± 0.22 | 0.64 ± 0.37 |
| Mix (adequate) | 15 | 423.20 ± 83.70 | 23.75 ± 1.64 | 12.64 ± 1.99 | 63.61 ± 2.61 | 83.29 ± 2.56*** |
| Mix (inadequate) | 15 | 383.47 ± 82.64 | 69.98 ± 3.32 | 6.36 ± 0.71 | 23.66 ± 2.87 | 78.05 ± 1.60*** |
| Half-and-half | 15 | 436.67 ± 78.51 | 19.00 ± 1.88 | 20.25 ± 1.05 | 60.75 ± 1.86 | 74.94 ± 1.21*** |
Percentages of each mature seed phenotype resulting from different hand-pollination treatments in Sagittaria pygmaea and S. trifolia.
Values are means ± SE. N, the number of aggregate fruits sampled. One-sample t-test comparing the proportion of filled seeds sired by S. pygmaea or S. trifolia with the expected proportion (50%), ***p < 0.001. Total seeds (total number of filled seeds and unfilled seeds). CP, conspecific pollen; HP, heterospecific pollen. Hand-pollination treatment: CP only (pure conspecific pollen), HP only (pure heterospecific pollen), Mix (1:1 mixture of CP and HP. Adequate means that the total number of pollen grains were approximately 5–10 times the number of carpels; inadequate means the total number of pollen grains were approximately equal to the number of carpels), half-and-half (one half of the gynoecium was pollinated with adequate CP and the other half with HP).
FIGURE 4
Percentages of filled seeds produced by hand-pollination experiments in which the maternal parent first received HP and later CP in Sagittaria pygmaea and S. trifolia. (A)S. pygmaea and (B)S. trifolia: HP-CP (sequence first HP then CP immediately), HP-0.5 h CP (sequence first HP 0.5 h later CP), HP-1 h CP (sequence first HP 1 h later CP) and HP-2 h CP (sequence first HP 2 h later CP). Asterisks show that the percentage of filled seeds is significantly differences from 50% (dashed line). (ns, not significant; ***p < 0.001). Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05). CP, conspecific pollen, HP, heterospecific pollen.
Discussion
Heterospecific pollen can fertilize ovules, resulting in interspecific seed discounting
Pollen deposition from closely related species can cause ovule wastage in congeners, which is a fitness cost termed interspecific seed discounting (Burgess et al., 2008) and has been observed in numerous plant species (Fishman and Wyatt, 1999; Arceo-Gomez and Ashman, 2011; Nishida et al., 2014; Baek et al., 2016; Takemori et al., 2019; Hashimoto et al., 2021). Similar results have been found in the present study. Here, the seeds produced by interspecific crosses between S. pygmaea and S. trifolia contained partially developed embryos and could not germinate, demonstrating the existence of a post-fertilization isolation mechanism between the two species. This also explains why hybrid plants have not been observed in nature despite the widespread coexistence of these species. A previous study on S. pygmaea and S. trifolia demonstrated that interspecific pollen tubes could pass through the basal opening to enter the ovules of other carpels. Still, the authors did not evaluate whether HP can successfully complete fertilization (Lyu et al., 2017). In this study, we developed molecular techniques to investigate whether sterile embryos produced by interspecific pollination between two Sagittaria species result from heterospecific gamete fusion, confirming that interspecific pollen could enter the ovule and successfully fertilize the egg cells.
According to previous studies on plant fertilization, there exists a fertilization recovery phenomenon and polytubey block in flowering plants (Beale et al., 2012; Kasahara et al., 2012; Yu et al., 2021). When the first pollen tube fails to fertilize, the synergid cell can actively rescue fertilization by attracting a second functional pollen tube, using this fertilization recovery mechanism to maximize the successful seed set. However, once the first pollen tube successfully achieved double fertilization, the other pollen tubes are prevented from entering the ovule micropyle. Hence, we speculate that when HP tubes enter the ovules and fertilize successfully, CP tubes will not be able to fertilize the same ovule; at this time, the extragynoecial compitum, which allows HP tubes to grow from one to another carpel, may increase the number of wasted ovules, magnifying the risk of interspecific reproductive interference.
Although the hybrid seeds in our study showed abnormal embryo development, the morphology and size of hybrid fruits were similar to those of fruits produced from conspecific pollination. This result is similar to those observations for Mimulus guttatus and M. nudatus, as both self-fertilized and hybrid fruits typically exhibited an increase in size. However, the self-fertilized seeds were round, whereas those produced by interspecific crosses were shriveled and hardly germinated (Oneal et al., 2016). Hybrid fruits that are typical in shape but not in seed characteristics have also been found in other species with interspecific pollination, such as Oryza, Solanum section Lycopersicon, Nemesia, Nicotiana, and Phacelia (Datson et al., 2006; Glass and Levy, 2011; Ishikawa et al., 2011; Baek et al., 2016; He et al., 2020). It implies that normally expanding fruits in nature may also contain some inviable seeds that arise from interspecific pollination. Thus, reproductive interference caused by HP deposition in nature may be more severe than that currently recognized.
Conspecific pollen advantage can mitigate the potential negative effects of interspecific pollen deposition
The extragynoecial compitum has the potential to magnify the risks of interspecific pollen deposition; however, our results suggest that the potential negative effects caused by HP are mitigated due to the CP advantage. In the CP and HP (1:1) mixed pollination experiment, we obtained more conspecific seeds (filled seeds) than expected (50%) based on the pollen ratio applied, indicating that CP has a seed-siring advantage over HP. In the half-and-half pollination treatment, we harvested 70.95% (S. pygmaea) and 78.05% (S. trifolia) of the filled seeds which were significantly higher than the proportion of carpels pollinated with CP to total carpels. It indicated that the CP tube could occupy ovules via the extragynoecial compitum that should be occupied by the HP. As CP has an advantage over HP, the extragynoecial compitum provides more opportunities for CP to occupy ovules, thereby alleviating the potential reproductive interference caused by HP and ensuring the reproductive success of the plants. It supports the view that intercarpellary pollen-tube growth mediated by the extragynoecial compitum in apocarpous angiosperms provides reproductive assurance under conditions of unpredictable pollination (Huang, 2003).
We speculated that the CP advantage exhibited by S. pygmaea and S. trifolia is likely to result from the extended growth route, lower fertilization rates or retarded growth of HP tubes in the pistils. Previous studies on S. trifolia have found that the maximum elongation distance of an extragynoecial pollen tube can span three carpels in a gynoecium (Huang and Wang, 2017). Thus, extragynoecial pollen-tube growth causes the pollen tube to travel a longer distance to reach the ovule. As the HP tube tends to pass through the opening at the base of the carpel into other carpels for fertilization (Lyu et al., 2017), it travels a longer path to enter ovules than the CP tube. Therefore, the time it takes for the pollen tube to enter the ovule may correspondingly increase. Our delayed CP pollination treatments showed that when HP pollination was followed by CP pollination after 0.5–1 h, approximately 50% or > 50% of filled seeds were obtained. This result is consistent with the finding that the HP tube was delayed in reaching the ovules by approximately 1 h due to longer routes (Lyu et al., 2017). Furthermore, based on Table 2, We could find that the HP pollination fertilized ovules and formed unfilled seeds; on the other hand, HP pollination led to a high proportion of “carpels without seeds” (the forth column in Table 2) which may suggest that the fertilization rate is lower after HP pollination as compared to CP pollination. Under this condition, the ovules could be fertilized by CP via the intercarpellary growth of pollen tubes. The results from the half-and-half pollination treatment support this hypothesis.
It is unclear whether there is a difference in the pollen tube growth rate between the species as HP tubes take longer to enter the ovule than CP tubes, and they also travel a longer route. A statistical analysis of pollen tube growth in 6,599 carpels at different stages after interspecific pollination between S. pygmaea and S. trifolia showed that the CP and HP tubes reached the vicinity of the ovary at approximately 1 h after pollination (Lyu et al., 2017). Therefore, the growth rate of pollen tubes in the early stages may not differ. However, pollen-tube growth rates may change with time in some species, such as in Iris brevicaulis and I. fulva (Emms et al., 1996). Differences in pollen tube growth patterns between CP and HP tubes may be due to the presence of species-specific substances in the pistil tissue that attract pollen tubes for directional growth and accelerate CP tubes enter ovules. A previous study on Arabidopsis thaliana showed that the species-specific female AtLURE1 peptides and their male counterparts—the PRK6 receptors—facilitate and maintain reproductive isolation by accelerating CP tubes to penetrate the septum and grow toward the ovules (Zhong et al., 2019). Similar species-specific substances might also be present in the pistil tissues of Sagittaria species, and this molecular mechanism deserves further investigation.
In apocarpous species, the extragynoecial compitum formed by the incomplete fusion of the carpel margins is the basis for the intercarpellary growth of pollen tubes. Its benefits in terms of reproductive assurance have received research attention. However, in the present study, we used S. pygmaea and S. trifolia as experimental materials to confirm that the incomplete fusion of the carpel margins allows HP tubes to enter the ovules and fertilize the egg cells, causing interspecific seed discounting. Our results also emphasize the importance of CP advantage, which is mediated by the extragynoecial compitum and mitigates the potential adverse effects of interspecific reproductive interference. Closely related species often share pollinators, especially in sympatric distributions (Mitchell et al., 2009; Runquist, 2012; Huang and Shi, 2013; Mizusawa et al., 2014; Tokuda et al., 2015; Katsuhara et al., 2019). Therefore, it is worthwhile investigating whether interspecific pollen transfer causes widespread reproductive interference and whether the CP advantage can mitigate the negative effect of HP deposition. Sagittaria plants in sympatric distributions, as well as exotic species such as S. graminea, have been found to hybridize with native plants (S. trifolia) (Zhang, 2014). Further studies on this genus could help better understand the prevalence of CP advantage mediated by the extragynoecial compitum and its role in maintaining species formation and stability.
Conclusion
In this study, we found that although fertile hybrid progenies could not be produced between S. pygmaea and S. trifolia, the pollen tubes of both species could germinate and grow into ovules during interspecific pollination, producing the aggregated fruits consisting of normal-looking achenes. In addition, the molecular identification of partially developed embryos revealed that interspecific pollen could successfully fertilize ovules, indicating that the extragynoecial compitum has the potential to magnify the negative effects of HP. However, our hand-pollination experiments showed that CP has a seed-siring advantage over HP and that CP tubes can occupy more ovules through the extragynoecial compitum, thus mitigating the potential adverse effects of interspecific pollen deposition.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author contributions
X-FW and C-HF conceived and designed the experiments. C-HF, S-ST, S-HS, JD, and X-YW performed the experiments. C-HF analyzed the data and wrote a preliminary version of the manuscript. SW, W-QL, and X-FW revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31970250).
Acknowledgments
We thank Wuhan University for allowing us to use the study site. We thank Zhi-E Liu, Cong Yang, and Jie Wen for their technical help in experimental operational matters used in the study. We also thank Xiao-Kang Dai for providing guidance regarding molecular technique, Chun-Hui Wang for her suggestions on data analysis, and Lan-Jie Huang for his constructive opinions on the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.956193/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AguilarJ. F.RosselloJ. A.FelinerG. N. (1999). Nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) concerted evolution in natural and artificial hybrids of Armeria (Plumbaginaceae).Mol. Ecol.81341–1346. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00690.x
2
Arceo-GomezG.AshmanT. L. (2011). Heterospecific pollen deposition: does diversity alter the consequences?New. Phytol.192738–746. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03831.x
3
AshmanT. L.Arceo-GomezG. (2013). Toward a predictive understanding of the fitness costs of heterospecific pollen receipt and its importance in co-flowering communities.Am. J. Bot.1001061–1070. 10.3732/ajb.1200496
4
BaekY. S.RoyerS. M.BrozA. K.CoveyP. A.Lopez-CasadoG.NunezR.et al (2016). Interspecific reproductive barriers between sympatric populations of wild tomato species (Solanum section Lycopersicon).Am. J. Bot.1031964–1978. 10.3732/ajb.1600356
5
BealeK. M.LeydonA. R.JohnsonM. A. (2012). Gamete fusion is required to block multiple pollen tubes from entering an Arabidopsis ovule.Curr. Biol.221090–1094. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.041
6
BrockM. T. (2009). Prezygotic barriers to gene flow between Taraxacum ceratophorum and the invasive Taraxacum officinale (Asteraceae).Oecologia161241–251. 10.1007/s00442-009-1383-0
7
BurgessK. S.MorganM.HusbandB. C. (2008). Interspecific seed discounting and the fertility cost of hybridization in an endangered species.New. Phytol.177276–283. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02244.x
8
CampbellD. R. (1985). Pollen and gene dispersal: the influences of competition for pollination.Evolution39418–431. 10.2307/2408374
9
ChapmanM. A.ForbesD. G.AbbottR. J. (2005). Pollen competition among two species of Senecio (Asteraceae) that form a hybrid zone on Mt. Etna, Sicily.Am. J. Bot.92730–735. 10.3732/ajb.92.4.730
10
ChenJ. K. (1989). Systematic and Evolutionary Studies on Sagittaria From China.Wuhan: Wuhan University Press.
11
DatsonP. M.MurrayB. G.HammettK. R. W. (2006). Pollination systems, hybridization barriers and meiotic chromosome behaviour in Nemesia hybrids.Euphytica151173–185. 10.1007/s10681-006-9138-z
12
DiazA.MacnairM. R. (1999). Pollen tube competition as a mechanism of prezygotic reproductive isolation between Mimulus nasutus and its presumed progeitor M. guttatus.New. Phytol.144471–478. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00543.x
13
DuW.WangX. F. (2012). Intercarpellary growth of pollen tubes in the extragynoecial compitum and its contribution to fruit set in an apocarpous species, Schisandra sphenanthera (Schisandraceae).Am. J. Bot.99961–966. 10.3732/ajb.1100165
14
EmerC.VaughanI. P.HiscockS.MemmottJ. (2015). The impact of the invasive alien plant, Impatiens glandulifera, on pollen transfer networks.PLoS One10:e0143532. 10.1371/journal.pone.0143532
15
EmmsS. K.HodgesS. A.ArnoldM. L. (1996). Pollen-tube competition, siring success, and consistent asymmetric hybridization in Louisiana irises.Evolution502201–2206. 10.2307/2410691
16
EndressP. K. (1980). The reproductive structures and systematic position of the Austrobaileyaceae.Bot. Jahrb. Syst.101393–433.
17
EndressP. K. (1982). Syncarpy and alternative modes of escaping disadvantages of apocarpy in primitive angiosperms.Taxon3148–52. 10.2307/1220588
18
EndressP. K. (1995). Floral structure and evolution in Ranunculanae.Plant Syst. Evol.947–61. 10.1007/978-3-7091-6612-3_5
19
EndressP. K.DoyleJ. A. (2009). Reconstructing the ancestral angiosperm flower and its initial specializations.Am. J. Bot.9622–66. 10.3732/ajb.0800047
20
EndressP. K.IgersheimA. (1997). Gynoecium diversity and systematics of the Laurales.Bot. J. Linnean Soc.12593–168. 10.1006/bojl.1997.0113
21
EndressP. K.IgersheimA. (2000). Gynoecium structure and evolution in basal angiosperms.Int. J. Plant Sci.161S211–S223. 10.1086/317572
22
FangQ.HuangS. Q. (2013). A directed network analysis of heterospecific pollen transfer in a biodiverse community.Ecology941176–1185. 10.1890/12-1634.1
23
FishmanL.WyattR. (1999). Pollinator-mediated competition, reproductive character displacement, and the evolution of selfing in Arenaria Uniflora (Caryophyllaceae).Evolution531723–1733. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04557.x
24
GalenC.GregoryT. (1989). Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition: consequences of foreign pollen contamination for seed set in the alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum.Oecologia81120–123. 10.1007/bf00377020
25
GlassP. M.LevyF. (2011). Correspondence of morphology, phylogeny and reproductive barriers in Phacelia subgenus cosmanthus (Hydrophyllaceae).J. Torrey Bot. Soc.138341–352. 10.3159/torrey-d-11-00037.1
26
GoodwillieC.NessJ. M. (2013). Interactions of hybridization and mating systems: a case study in Leptosiphon (Polemoniaceae).Am. J. Bot.1001002–1013. 10.3732/ajb.1200616
27
HashimotoK.YamamotoA.KanaokaM. M.NaikiA.TakakuraK. I.NishidaS. (2021). Comparisons among populations and individuals to evaluate pollen-pistil interaction as a mechanism of reproductive interference in Taraxacum.J. Plant Res.13529–40. 10.1007/s10265-021-01352-x
28
HeH.YokoiS.TezukaT. (2020). A high maternal genome excess causes severe seed abortion leading to ovary abscission in Nicotiana interploidy-interspecific crosses.Plant Direct4:e00257. 10.1002/pld3.257
29
HowardD. J. (1999). Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.30109–132. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.109
30
HuangL. J.WangX. F. (2017). Gynoecium structure and extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth in an apocarpous species, Sagittaria trifolia (Alismataceae).Plant Syst. Evol.303259–266. 10.1007/s00606-016-1367-6
31
HuangL. J.WangX. W.WangX. F. (2014). The structure and development of incompletely closed carpels in an apocarpous species, Sagittaria trifolia (Alismataceae).Am. J. Bot.1011229–1234. 10.3732/ajb.1400172
32
HuangS. Q. (2003). Reproductive success by unusual growth of pollen tubes to ovules.New. Phytol.158232–234. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00749.x
33
HuangS. Q.ShiX. Q. (2013). Floral isolation in Pedicularis: how do congeners with shared pollinators minimize reproductive interference?New Phytol.199858–865. 10.1111/nph.12327
34
HwangBoK.SonS. H.LeeJ. S.MinS. R.KoS. M.LiuJ. R.et al (2009). Rapid and simple method for DNA extraction from plant and algal species suitable for PCR amplification using a chelating resin Chelex 100.Plant Biotechnol. Rep.449–52. 10.1007/s11816-009-0117-4
35
IshikawaR.OhnishiT.KinoshitaY.EiguchiM.KurataN.KinoshitaT. (2011). Rice interspecies hybrids show precocious or delayed developmental transitions in the endosperm without change to the rate of syncytial nuclear division.Plant J.65798–806. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04466.x
36
KasaharaR. D.MaruyamaD.HamamuraY.SakakibaraT.TwellD.HigashiyamaT. (2012). Fertilization recovery after defective sperm cell release in Arabidopsis.Curr. Biol.221084–1089. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.069
37
KatsuharaK. R.UshimaruA.KudoG. (2019). Prior selfing can mitigate the negative effects of mutual reproductive interference between coexisting congeners.Funct. Ecol.331504–1513. 10.1111/1365-2435.13344
38
KumarS.StecherG.TamuraK. (2016). MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets.Mol. Biol. Evol.331870–1874. 10.1093/molbev/msw054
39
LiaoW. J.ZhuB. R.LiY. F.LiX. M.ZengY. F.ZhangD. Y. (2019). A comparison of reproductive isolation between two closely related oak species in zones of recent and ancient secondary contact.BMC Evol. Biol.19:70. 10.1186/s12862-019-1399-y
40
LiaoY. Y.GichiraA. W.WangQ. F.ChenJ. M. (2016). Molecular phylogeography of four endemic Sagittaria species (Alismataceae) in the Sino-Japanese Floristic Region of East Asia.Bot. J. Linnean Soc.1806–20. 10.1111/boj.12351
41
LopesS. A.BergamoP. J.QueirozS. N. P.OllertonJ.SantosT.RechA. R. (2021). Heterospecific pollen deposition is positively associated with reproductive success in a diverse hummingbird-pollinated plant community.Oikos20221–12. 10.1111/oik.08714
42
LyewJ.LiZ.Liang-ChenY.Yi-BoL.SageT. L. (2007). Pollen tube growth in association with a dry-type stigmatic transmitting tissue and extragynoecialcompitum in the basal angiosperm Kadsura longipedunculata (Schisandraceae).Am. J. Bot.941170–1182. 10.3732/ajb.94.7.1170
43
LyuN.DuW.WangX. F. (2017). Unique growth paths of heterospecific pollen tubes result in late entry into ovules in the gynoecium of Sagittaria (Alismataceae).Plant Biol.19108–114. 10.1111/plb.12508
44
MartinF. W. (1970). Pollen germination on foreign stigmas.Bull. Torrey Bot. Club971–6. 10.2307/2483984
45
MitchellR. J.FlanaganR. J.BrownB. J.WaserN. M.KarronJ. D. (2009). New frontiers in competition for pollination.Ann. Bot.1031403–1413. 10.1093/aob/mcp062
46
MizusawaL.TakimotoG.YamasakiM.IsagiY.HasegawaM. (2014). Comparison of pollination characteristics between the insular shrub Clerodendrum izuinsulare and its widespread congener C. trichotomum.Plant Spec. Biol.2973–84. 10.1111/j.1442-1984.2012.00385.x
47
MontgomeryB. R.SoperD. M.DelphL. F. (2010). Asymmetrical conspecific seed-siring advantage between Silene latifolia and S. dioica.Ann. Bot.105595–605. 10.1093/aob/mcq013
48
MoralesC. L.TravesetA. (2008). Interspecific pollen transfer: magnitude, prevalence and consequences for plant fitness.Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.27221–238. 10.1080/07352680802205631
49
Moreira-HernándezJ. I.MuchhalaN. (2019). Importance of pollinator-mediated interspecific pollen transfer for angiosperm evolution.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.50191–217. 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110218-024804
50
MuchhalaN.ThomsonJ. D. (2012). Interspecific competition in pollination systems: costs to male fitness via pollen misplacement.Funct. Ecol.26476–482. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01950.x
51
NatalisL. C.WesselinghR. A. (2012). Post-pollination barriers and their role in asymmetric hybridization in Rhinanthus (Orobanchaceae).Am. J. Bot.991847–1856. 10.3732/ajb.1200085
52
NishidaS.KanaokaM. M.HashimotoK.NishidaT.KudoG. (2014). Pollen-pistil interactions in reproductive interference: comparisons of heterospecific pollen tube growth from alien species between two native Taraxacum species.Funct. Ecol.28450–457. 10.1111/1365-2435.12165
53
OnealE.WillisJ. H.FranksR. G. (2016). Disruption of endosperm development is a major cause of interspecific seed discounting between Mimulus guttatus and Mimulus nudatus.New Phytol.2101107–1120. 10.1111/nph.13842
54
RandallJ. L.HiluK. W. (1990). Interference through improper pollen transfer in mixed stands of Impatiens capensis and I. pallida (Balsaminaceae).Am. J. Bot.77939–944. 10.2307/2444509
55
RennerS. S.SchwarzbachA. E.LohmannL. (1997). Phylogenetic position and floral function of Siparuna (Siparunaceae: Laurales).Int. J. Plant Sci.158S89–S98. 10.1086/297509
56
RozasJ.Sanchez-DelBarrioJ. C.MesseguerX.RozasR. (2003). DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods.Bioinformatics192496–2497. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359
57
RunquistR. D. B. (2012). Pollinator-mediated competition between two congeners, Limnanthes douglasii subsp. rosea and L. alba (Limnanthaceae).Am. J. Bot.991125–1132. 10.3732/ajb.1100588
58
SongZ. P.LuB. R.ZhuY. G.ChenJ. K. (2002). Pollen competition between cultivated and wild rice species (Oryza sativa and O. rufipogon).New. Phytol.153289–296. 10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00319.x
59
TakemoriA.NaikiA.TakakuraK. I.KanaokaM. M.NishidaS. (2019). Comparison of mechanisms of reproductive interference in Taraxacum.Ann. Bot.1231017–1027. 10.1093/aob/mcz007
60
ThomsonJ. D.AndrewsB. J.PlowrightR. C. (1982). The effect of a foreign pollen on ovule development in Diervilla lonicera (Caprifoliaceae).New Phytol.90777–783. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb03286.x
61
TokudaN.HattoriM.AbeK.ShinoharaY.NaganoY.ItinoT. (2015). Demonstration of pollinator-mediated competition between two native Impatiens species, Impatiens noli-tangere and I. textori (Balsaminaceae).Ecol. Evol.51271–1277. 10.1002/ece3.1431
62
TurC.SaezA.TravesetA.AizenM. A. (2016). Evaluating the effects of pollinator-mediated interactions using pollen transfer networks: evidence of widespread facilitation in south Andean plant communities.Ecol. Lett.19576–586. 10.1111/ele.12594
63
WangJ.CruzanM. B. (1998). Interspecific mating in the Piriqueta caroliniana (Turneraceae) complex: effects of pollen load size and composition.Am. J. Bot.851172–1179. 10.2307/2446350
64
WangX. F.ArmbrusterW. S.HuangS. Q. (2012). Extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth in apocarpous angiosperms is phylogenetically widespread and probably adaptive.New Phytol.193253–260. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03912.x
65
WangX. F.TanY. Y.ChenJ. H.LuY. T. (2006). Pollen tube reallocation in two preanthesis cleistogamous species, Ranalisma rostratum and Sagittaria guyanensis ssp. lappula (Alismataceae).Aquat. Bot.85233–240. 10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.05.005
66
WangX. F.TaoY. B.LuY. T. (2002). Pollen tubes enter neighbouring ovules by way of receptacle tissue, resulting in increased fruit-set in Sagittaria potamogetifolia Merr.Ann. Bot.89791–796. 10.1093/aob/mcf136
67
WaserN. M. (1978). Interspecific pollen transfer and competition between co-occurring plant species.Oecologia36223–236. 10.1007/bf00349811
68
WaserN. M.FugateM. L. (1986). Pollen precedence and stigma closure: a mechanism of competition for pollination between Delphinium nelsonii and Ipomopsis aggregata.Oecologia70573–577. 10.1007/BF00379906
69
WhiteT. J.BrunsT. D.LeeS.TaylorJ. J. (1990). “Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics,” in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, edsGelfandM. A.SninskyJ. J.WhiteJ. (New York, NY: Academic Press), 315–322. 10.1016/b978-012-372180-8.50042-1
70
WilliamsE. G.SageT. L.ThienL. B. (1993). Functional syncarpy by intercarpellary growth of pollen tubes in a primitive apocarpous angiosperm, Illicium Floridanum (Illiciaceae).Am. J. Bot.80137–142. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1993.tb13780.x
71
WolfP. G.CampbellD. R.WaserN. M.SipesS. D.TolerT. R.ArchibaldJ. K. (2001). Tests of pre- and postpollination barriers to hybridization between sympatric species of Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae).Am. J. Bot.88213–219. 10.2307/2657012
72
YuX. B.ZhangX. C.ZhaoP.PengX. B.ChenH.BleckmannA.et al (2021). Fertilized egg cells secrete endopeptidases to avoid polytubey.Nature592433–437. 10.1038/s41586-021-03387-5
73
ZhangL. H. (2014). Mechanisms of Ecological Adaptation on an Alien Plant, Sagittaria Graminea in Yalu River Wetlands.Changchun, China: Northeast Normal University. (Ph.D.thesis).
74
ZhongS.LiuM. L.WangZ. J.HuangQ. P.HouS. Y.XuY. C.et al (2019). Cysteine-rich peptides promote interspecific genetic isolation in Arabidopsis.Science364:eaau9564. 10.1126/science.aau9564
Summary
Keywords
conspecific pollen advantage, extragynoecial compitum, reproductive interference, heterospecific pollen deposition, interspecific seed discounting, Sagittaria
Citation
Fei C-H, Tang S-S, Shang S-H, Dai J, Wang X-Y, Wang S, Liu W-Q and Wang X-F (2022) Conspecific pollen advantage mediated by the extragynoecial compitum and its potential to resist interspecific reproductive interference between two Sagittaria species. Front. Plant Sci. 13:956193. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.956193
Received
30 May 2022
Accepted
27 June 2022
Published
22 July 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Yuan-Wen Duan, Kunming Institute of Botany (CAS), China
Reviewed by
Wan-Jin Liao, Beijing Normal University, China; Ying-Ze Xiong, Central China Normal University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Fei, Tang, Shang, Dai, Wang, Wang, Liu and Wang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiao-Fan Wang, wangxf@whu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Plant Bioinformatics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.