Abstract
This study was aimed at elucidating the significance of photorespiratory serine (Ser) production for cysteine (Cys) biosynthesis. For this purpose, sulfur (S) metabolism and its crosstalk with nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) metabolism were analyzed in wildtype Arabidopsis and its photorespiratory bou-2 mutant with impaired glycine decarboxylase (GDC) activity. Foliar glycine and Ser contents were enhanced in the mutant at day and night. The high Ser levels in the mutant cannot be explained by transcript abundances of genes of the photorespiratory pathway or two alternative pathways of Ser biosynthesis. Despite enhanced foliar Ser, reduced GDC activity mediated a decline in sulfur flux into major sulfur pools in the mutant, as a result of deregulation of genes of sulfur reduction and assimilation. Still, foliar Cys and glutathione contents in the mutant were enhanced. The use of Cys for methionine and glucosinolates synthesis was reduced in the mutant. Reduced GDC activity in the mutant downregulated Calvin Cycle and nitrogen assimilation genes, upregulated key enzymes of glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) pathway and modified accumulation of sugars and TCA intermediates. Thus, photorespiratory Ser production can be replaced by other metabolic Ser sources, but this replacement deregulates the cross-talk between S, N, and C metabolism.
Introduction
Sulfate assimilation constitutes the source of reduced sulfur for the synthesis of cysteine and numerous primary and secondary metabolites (). Therefore, sulfate acquired by the roots is transported in the xylem sap to the leaves and allocated to the chloroplasts for reduction and assimilation (). Cysteine (Cys) is the terminal product of sulfur assimilation. It is synthesized in the chloroplast, the mitochondria and the cytosol () from sulfide in a two-step reaction: In the first step, serine acetyltransferase (SAT) catalyses the synthesis of O-acetylserine (OAS) from serine (Ser) and acetyl CoA, while in the second step O-acetyl-serine (thiol) lyase (OAS-TL) mediates the synthesis of Cys by incorporation of sulfide into OAS (; ). SAT and OAS-TL form the Cys synthetase complex (CSC), which plays a regulatory role in Cys synthesis by protein–protein interactions of its constituent enzymes (Wirtz et al., 2012).
Beside its requirement for protein synthesis, Cys is an important precursor of all thiol containing organic sulfur compounds, including glutathione (GSH), methionine (Met), and glucosinolates (GLS). With its thiol group, GSH is involved in numerous redox reactions (), but also constitutes the storage and long-distance transport form of reduced sulfur (). In addition, it plays an important role in scavenging reactive oxygen species in the ascorbate-glutathione cycle (), in the detoxification of xenobiotics by conjugation via GSH-S transferases () and for the sequestration of heavy metals as metabolic precursor of phytochelatins that function as heavy metal chelators (; ). Met is another important sink of Cys from its cytosolic, plastidic and/or mitochondrial pool. It serves as a building block for protein, S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) and S-methylmethionine (SMM) biosynthesis (). Glucosinolates are secondary sulfur-rich metabolites with a defense function against herbivores and pathogens (), characteristic for Brassicaceae ().
Cys synthesis requires a cross talk of sulfur assimilation with nitrogen and carbon metabolism (). The carbon skeleton and the nitrogen in Cys both originate from Ser. 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PGA), an intermediate of glycolysis and 2-phospoglycolate, a product of photorespiration, are sources of the carbon skeleton in Ser, while nitrogen is a product of nitrate reduction and assimilation (). Since nitrogen assimilation is catalyzed by the GS-GOGAT pathway that requires 2-oxoglutarate for glutamate synthesis, reactions of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in mitochondria are also involved in providing Ser for Cys synthesis (). Ser biosynthesis takes place in different cellular compartments, i.e., in plastids, the mitochondria and the cytosol. Its synthesis is achieved by three distinct alternative routes, a photorespiratory and two non-photorespiratory pathways, i.e., the phosphorylated pathway and the glycerate pathway (). The mitochondrial photorespiratory pathway of Ser biosynthesis is currently considered the dominant biosynthetic route of Ser synthesis in photosynthetic cells, while the phosphorylated pathway is supposed to predominantly proceed in plastids of non-photosynthetic tissues or in photosynthetic tissue during night (). An Arabidopsis transgenic line, deficient in phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PGDH) activity showed reduced growth that can be restored by external provision of Ser. In addition, when this mutant was cultivated at high CO2 conditions, which suppresses photorespiration, reduced growth and development of new leaves were observed (). This finding supports the idea that photorespiratory Ser production is the dominant route of Ser biosynthesis in leaves. The Arabidopsis mutant shm1-1, defective in mitochondrial Ser hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT), can survive only in elevated CO2 (Voll et al., 2006). The SHM2 isozyme of the SHMT gene is expressed in vascular tissue of leaves and, in contrast to the shmt1-1 mutant, the shm2-2 mutant, deficient in the SHM2 gene, does not display a visible phenotype in ambient air (). However, the double mutant (shm1 × shm2) cannot survive without Suc supplementation even at elevated CO2, indicating that the presence of at least one isozyme, either SHMT1 or SHMT2, is essential for non-photorespiratory carbon metabolism ().
For studying the significance of the photorespiratory pathway of Ser biosynthesis in Cys production, the Arabidopsis “a bout de soufflé” (bou-2) mutant, with reduced activity of the mitochondrial glycine decarboxylase (GDC) multi-enzyme due to knock-down of mitochondrial BOU transporter protein, seems to be a suitable subject. The BOU gene is strongly co-expressed with the genes GDP2, GDP1, GDT, and HGDH3 encoding subunits of the GDC multi-enzyme complex, and SHM1, encoding mitochondrial SHM1 (). In experiments with the Arabidopsis bou-2 mutant, the level of GDP protein was decreased, which led to a strongly reduced GDC activity (). Although bou-2 plants are not lethal, they show severe growth defects at ambient CO2, such as slow shoot apical meristem cell cycle activity and cell division (). After 2 days of growth at elevated CO2, cell division was resumed in bou-2 mutants, indicating the requirement of suppression of photorespiration by elevated CO2 for growth and development of the mutant ().
The aim of the present study was (1) to elucidate the significance of chloroplastic and mitochondrial pathways of Ser production for Cys biosynthesis, and its use for protein, GSH and GLS production and (2) to identify genes involved in the crosstalk between sulfur and nitrogen metabolism. Experiments were conducted with Arabidopsis wild type (WT) plants as control in comparison to bou-2 plants with impaired photorespiration. It is hypothesized that despite different cellular localization of Cys biosynthesis (chloroplast, mitochondria, and cytosol), photorespiratory (mitochondrial) Ser is the dominant precursor of Cys synthesis in photosynthetic tissue during light (hypothesis 1). Further it is hypothesized that Ser biosynthesis in chloroplasts/plastids takes over Ser production for Cys biosynthesis in photosynthetic tissue in the dark (hypothesis 2). As third hypothesis it is assumed that these differences in Ser supply for Cys biosynthesis between day and night are regulated by gene expression. To address these hypotheses, S-flux experiments combined with metabolome and RNAseq analyses were performed.
Materials and Methods
Plant Material and Growth Conditions
Arabidopsis thaliana Heynh. Col–0 and its mutant bou-2 (; ), available from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre as N370142 and harboring a T-DNA insertion in the second exon of the BOU gene sequence, were used in this study. Bioinformatic analysis confirmed that the bou-2 mutant line contains a single T-DNA insertion exclusively for the locus At5g46800 encoding BOU transporter protein (see Supplementary Method S1). For sterilization, Arabidopsis seeds were washed twice with 70% (v/v) ethanol, containing 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, twice with 100% ethanol and dried. Seeds were grown on 0.5 Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium () with 0.8% (w/v) agar at pH 5.8. After cold stratification at 4°C to synchronize germination, seedlings were grown at 60% relative humidity, 100–150 μmol photons m-2 s-1, 12 h light / 12 h dark, 22°C / 18°C in a 3,000 ppm CO2-enriched atmosphere. Seedlings with two developed leaves were transferred to soil and cultivated 4 more weeks under the conditions indicated above. Experiments were conducted with plants of similar developmental stage.
Experimental Design
Arabidopsis wildtype (WT) and bou-2 mutant plants were transferred to ambient CO2 (400 ppm) 24 h prior to harvest. Two sets of plants were harvested (1) ca. 10 min after light onset and (2) 3 h before light onset. The whole rosette of the first set of plants was used for quantification of metabolites and for RNAseq analyses. From the other set of plants fully mature leaves (number 5 to 7 counted by the order of emergence from the rosette) were cut. Half of these leaves were exposed to [35S]-sulfate for analysis of total sulfate uptake, the flux into the pools of sulfate, proteins, GSH and GLS, as well as GSH and GLS contents. The other half of the leaves was treated in the same way with non-radioactive Hoagland solution and was used for the determination of sulfate and protein contents. Leaf samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until further use.
[35S]-Sulfate Feeding Experiment and Analysis of [35S]-Uptake
Before conducting [35S]-sulfate feeding experiments, a preliminary test with tree time points (2, 4, and 6 h) of incubation with labeled SO42- was performed in order to confirm linearity of uptake (data not shown). From these preliminary tests, a 4 h incubation time was found to be well in the linear phase of sulfate uptake. For [35S]-sulfate feeding experiments, leaves were transferred into tubes (Sarstedt AG & Co., Nümbrecht, Germany) with 10 mL of Hoagland solution (5 mM KNO3, 5 mM Ca(NO3)2, 2.5 mM KH2PO4, 2.5 mM KOH, 25 μM MnCl2, 2.5 μM ZnSO4, 1.25 μM CuSO4, 0.075 mM H3BO3, 2.5 μM Na2MoO4, 1.25 μM Co(NO3)2, and 0.0675 mM Fe-EDTA) adjusted to 0.2 mM SO42- for 2 h of pre-incubation. Thereafter, leaves were placed for 4 h in new Hoagland solution with [35S]-SO42- (Hartman Analytic, Braunschweig, Germany) at 50 μCi (1.85 × 10-6 Bq) for day and 100 μCi (3.7 × 10-7 Bq) for night. At the beginning of the incubation, leaves were placed in a desiccator and infiltrated with a vacuum pump to exchange air from the apoplastic space with radioactive Hoagland solution. At the end, sulfate uptake was stopped by washing the leaves with 10 mL non-radioactive incubation solution. For night experiments, pre-incubation and incubation were performed in the dark; night harvests were carried out under green light (GreenHornet LED, 3.5W; Dutch-Headshop Services, Beverwijk, Netherlands). Leaf tissue was homogenized with a micro pestle and mortar, extracted with 0.1 M HCl at a ratio of 1:10 (w/v). Aliquots of 10 μL extract were mixed with 2 mL of Rotiszint® eco plus (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) scintillation cocktail and radioactivity was determined with a scintillation counter (LS 6500 Multi-Purpose Scintillation Counter, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, United States). From the data obtained and the specific radioactivity of the incubation solution, sulfate uptake was calculated.
[35S]-Metabolite Analyses and Determination of Flux Through the Sulfate Assimilation Pathway
The flux through the sulfate assimilation pathway was calculated as incorporation of 35[S]-sulfate into GSH, proteins and GLS, as previously described by and .
Protein Contents and [35S] Flux Into Proteins
For protein analysis, 30 μL of a fresh prepared solution containing dithiothreitol (DTT, 500 mM), phenylmethylsulfonylchloride (PMSF, 100 mM) and 10% Triton x-100 were added into 2 mL micro tubes (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) containing a mixture of 50 mg of pre-washed polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVP 6755, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and 500 μL buffer solution (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 15% glycerol (v/v)) previously incubated overnight at 4°C. Approximately 30 mg ground leaf material were added, suspended by vortexing and incubated for 30 min at 4°C. After centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C, 200 μL supernatant were transferred into new tubes and 200 μL trichloroacetic acid (TCA, 10%) were added. Samples were incubated at room temperature for 10 min and centrifuged at 15,000 × g and 4°C. The supernatant was discarded. The pellet was dissolved in 500 μL 1 M KOH by shaking for 30 min at 4°C. The protein content was determined as described by using dilutions of 1 mg mL-1 bovine serum album (BSA) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), dissolved in 1 M KOH as a standard. Micro test plates (96 Well, Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) were filled with 200 μL Bradford Reagent (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and aliquots of 10 μL samples and standards were added in triplicates. After 10 min incubation at room temperature in the dark, the optical density was measured at a wavelength of 595 nm using an ELISA reader (Rainbow Thermo Reader, Tecan, Crailsheim, Germany). To determine radioactivity in proteins, aliquots of 50 μL supernatant previously extracted with 0.1 M HCl (see: [35S]-sulfate feeding experiment and analysis of [35S]-uptake) were transferred into new 1.5 mL micro tubes (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany). Protein was precipitated with 12.5 μL 100% trichloracetic acid (TCA) as described by . After 15 min on ice, 100 μl 100% TCA was added and the precipitate was collected by centrifugation (at 15,000 × g for 10 min). The supernatants were discarded and the pellets were washed with 200 μL 100% ethanol. Subsequently, pellets were dissolved in 100 μL 0.1 M NaOH. Radioactivity was determined in 200 μL supernatant mixed with 2 mL Rotiszint® eco plus scintillation cocktail (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany).
Thiol Contents and [35S] Flux Into Thiols
Total thiol contents were determined as previously described by and modified by . For this purpose, aliquots of 25 μL supernatant extracted with 0.1 M HCl (see: [35S] sulfate feeding experiment and analysis of [35S] uptake) were transferred into 1.5 mL micro tubes (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) and neutralized by adding an equal volume of 0.1 M NaOH. Reduction of thiols was performed with dithiothreitol (DTT; 1 μl, 100 mM) for 15 min in the dark at 37°C. Aliquots of 11.5 μL 1 M Tris buffer and 35 μl distilled water were added. After 15 min of derivatization with monobromobimane (5 μl, 100 mM) in the dark at 37°C, thiols were stabilized by adding 100 μL acetic acid (9%, v / v). Aliquots of 100 μL derivatized solution were injected into a HPLC system (Dionex UltiMate 3000; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, United States) and thiol derivatives were separated on a Spherisorb® ODS2(C18) (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size) column (Waters, Milford, CT, United States), using a solution of 0.25% (v / v) acetic acid and 10% (v / v) methanol as buffer A and 0.25% acetic acid and 90% (v / v) methanol as buffer B. Thiols were detected fluorometrically (474 Fluorescence detector; Waters, Milford, CT, United States) with excitation at 390 nm and emission at 480 nm. 35[S] incorporation into thiols was detected by a radioactivity detector module (FlowStar LB 513; Berthold Technologies, Bad Wildbad, Germany) connected to the HPLC.
GLS Analysis and [35S] Flux Into GLS
The 35[S] flux into GLS and GLS contents were quantified after extraction of leaf tissue with 500 μL 70% (v/v) methanol as described by . Aliquots of 10 μL sinigrin hydrate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were added to leaf extracts as internal standard. After 45 min incubation at 70°C, supernatants were placed on previously prepared sephadex columns (DEAE SephadexTM A-25, GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden) and washed with sterile ddH2O. Then 75 μL sulfatase (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) were added to the columns and left overnight at room temperature. Subsequently, GLS were eluted with 1 mL sterile ddH2O. The eluate was collected in 1.5 mL micro tubes with caps (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany), vortexed and centrifuged 5 min at 15,000 × g. For determination of GLS, 50 μL supernatant were injected into a HPLC system (Dionex UltiMate 3000; Thermo Fisher, Dreieich, Germany) and separated on a Spherisorb® ODS2(C18) (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size) column, using distilled water (solvent A) and 100 % acetonitrile (solvent B) for elution. Quantification was based on UV absorption at 229 nm and the response factor of the internal standard. To determine 35[S] incorporation into GLS, 300 μL supernatant were mixed with 3 mL Rotiszint®eco plus scintillation cocktail (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) and radioactivity was determined by scintillation counting.
Quantification of Sulfate
Sulfate contents were analyzed by anion exchange chromatography as described by . For this purpose, 20–30 mg homogenized frozen leaf tissue were added to a mixture of ∼20 mg of pre-washed polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVP 6755, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and 1 mL distilled water previously incubated overnight at 4°C and suspended by shaking. Samples were incubated for 1 h at 4°C and afterward boiled for 15 min at 95°C in a water bath (Julabo, Seelbach, Germany). After centrifugation for 15 min at 15,000 × g and 4°C, supernatants were transferred into new tubes. Aliquots of 150 μL were pipetted into glass vials (1.5 mL, 32 × 11.6 mm; VWR International, Darmstadt, Germany) and subjected to anion analysis using an automatic ion analyser (DX 120, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, United States), equipped with an IonPacTM column (AS9-SC, 4 × 250 mm; Dionex, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, United States). Anions were eluted with a mixture of 2.0 mM Na2CO3 and 0.75 mM NaHCO3. Sulfate was detected by a conductivity detector module (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, United States).
Metabolite Measurements
Metabolite Measurement by GC-MS
Aliquots of 50–80 mg frozen leaf material were extracted with a mixture of chloroform-methanol-water for analysis of sugars, organic acids and amino acids by gas chromatography-mass-spectrometry (GC-MS) according to , using a 7200 GC-QTOF (Agilent, Milford, CT, United States). Peak integration was conducted with MassHunter Software from Agilent. For relative quantification, metabolite peak areas were normalized to the amount of extracted plant material and the peak area of the internal standard ribitol added to the extraction solution.
Met and Ser Quantification by UHPLC-DAD
Extracts, as prepared for GC-MS analysis (described above), were dried and resolved in 50 μL HCl (0.1 M). Aliquots of 10 μL were derivatized with AccQ-Tag Ultra Reagent Powder (Waters, Milford, CT, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Derivatized samples were separated by liquid chromatography and amino acids were detected at 260 nm, using a 1290 UHPLC system coupled to a diode array detector (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, United States) according to . Peaks were integrated using the Chemstation software from Agilent and quantified by external standards after normalization to the internal standard norvaline, added prior to derivatization and the amount of extracted plant material.
Statistical Analysis of Metabolite and Metabolite Flux Data
Metabolite and [35S] flux data were statistically analyzed using the software package SigmaPlot V. 11.0 (Systat, Erkrath, Germany). Prior to the analysis of variance, normality of the data was tested with the Shapiro–Wilk test. To determine significant differences between the WT and the bou-2 mutant within the same time point and between day and night within the same plant genotype, Student’s t-test was performed. Sulfate uptake and flux into sulfur pools were determined with 4, metabolite contents with 3 replicates. All data shown represent means + SD. Principal component analysis (PCA, Supplementary Figure S1) was produced with function prcomp (%) implemented in the R statistics software. Adapted venn diagram (Supplementary Figure S1) was calculated with an in-house R script. The evaluation of data in Venn diagrams and PCA plots are provided with Supplementary Figure S1. The graphic work was performed either in OriginPro V.9.1. (Additive, Friedrichsdorf, Germany) (Figures 1, 6 and Supplementary Figure S3) or R statistics software (R version 3.3.0 provided by the CRAN project1).
FIGURE 1
Next Generation Sequencing of RNA
RNA Extraction, Preparation, and Sequencing of Illumina Libraries
Whole rosettes were harvested and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. RNA was isolated from ground tissue using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Residues of DNA were removed with DNase (New England Biolabs, Ipswitch, MA, United States). RNA integrity, sequencing library, and fragment size were analyzed on a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States). Libraries were prepared using the TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit v2 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States) and quantified with a Qubit 2.0 (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, United States). Samples were multiplexed with 12 libraries per lane and sequenced in paired-end mode (Rapid Run, 150 bp read length) on an Illumina HiSeq 3000 platform, yielding on average ∼26 million reads per library.
Read Mapping and mRNA-Seq Data Analysis
After successful quality control with the Fast QC software2 (v0.11.5), Illumina reads were quantified by mapping against the Arabidopsis TAIR10 reference transcriptome including primary and secondary transcripts3 using Kallisto v 0.43.0 () in default mode with 30 times bootstrapping for sleuth. Kallisto provides normalized gene expression in transcripts per million (tpm). Primary transcripts for heat maps were chosen based on highest average tpm in the WT.
Wald test implemented in sleuth v0.28.1 () was employed to test for differential gene expression between WT and bou-2 at day and night or between day and night within each genotype. If not indicated otherwise, p-values were corrected for multiple sampling by Benjamini–Hochberg correction () as implemented in sleuth and an alpha of 0.01 was chosen. Log2 expression ratios between genotypes or time points were calculated after addition of a pseudo-count of 1 to prevent infinite values.
Results
Consequences of Reduced GDC Activity and Day/Night on Gly and Ser Synthesis
Despite pre-cultivation at elevated CO2 to suppress photorespiratory Gly production, leaves of the bou-2 mutant with impaired GDC activity () had accumulated large amounts of Gly after 24 h growth at ambient CO2 at both, day and night (Figure 1A). Leaves of the bou-2 mutant also contained higher levels of Ser at both time points, although Ser synthesis via SHMT is downstream of GDC (Figure 1B). In leaves of the WT, but not of the bou-2 mutant, Ser levels were reduced in the night compared to day (Figure 1B). Transcript level for three of the four GDC isoforms (namely GDC-H, -P and -T) were significantly down-regulated in bou-2 compared to the WT at night (Figure 2). SHMT3 gene was up-regulated at day and night, while SHMT1 was down-regulated at the night in the bou-2 mutant (Figure 2). In addition, transcript abundances of genes encoding for one or multiple isoforms of seven key enzymes and transporters of photorespiration (GOX1, glycolate oxidase; PLGG1, plastidic glycolate glycerate transporter; HPR1, hydroxypyruvate reductase; GLYK, glycerate kinase) (Supplementary Figure S2) as well as the associated nitrogen assimilation (major isoforms of Fd-GOGAT and GS) were reduced in the bou-2 mutant (Figure 3). Three genes encoding photorespiratory enzymes exhibited elevated transcript abundances in bou-2, including the major isoform of Ser-glutamate amino transferase (SGAT), SHMT3 and catalase 1 (CAT1) and 3 (CAT3), but not CAT2, which is the primary isoform in WT plants (Supplementary Figure S2). These data indicated that the high level of Ser in leaves of the bou-2 mutant cannot be explained by transcript abundances of genes of the photorespiratory pathway, and other processes including post-transcriptional and post-translational modifications cannot be excluded.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3

Nitrogen assimilation and the GABA shunt. (A) Schematic presentation of the pathways; (B) Transcript levels (n = 3) of genes encoding for enzymes highlighted in gray boxes in panel A. Left two tiles of gene represent the log2-fold change (FC) between the bou-2 mutant and WT plants under both day (D) and night (N) with false color code ranging from red (higher in bou-2) to blue (higher in WT). Right two tiles represent the log2-fold change (FC) between day and night within WT plants and the bou-2 mutant with false color code ranging from green (higher at night) to yellow (higher at day). Asterisks indicate differential gene expression as determined by Sleuth (∗FDR < 0.05, ∗∗FDR < 0.01, and ∗∗∗FDR < 0.001). AspAT, aspartate aminotransferase; ASN, asparagine synthetase; GABA, gamma-Aminobutyric acid; GabaAT, GABA aminotransferase; GDH, glutamate dehydrogenase; GOGAT, glutamate synthase; GS, glutamine synthase; SSADH, succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase.
Gene expression of the other two pathways of Ser biosynthesis in the leaves were not as strongly altered in the bou-2 mutant as gene expression of the photorespiratory pathway, with the glycerate pathway being the least affected. In the phosphorylated pathway of Ser synthesis, 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PGA) is converted to 3-phosphohydroxypyruvate (3-PHP) by 3-PGA dehydrogenase (PGDH) and further to phosphoserine by 3-PS aminotransferase (PSAT). While transcript abundances of PGDH1, PGDH2, and PSAT1 encoding these enzymes were higher in the bou-2 mutant at night, abundance of 3-phosphoserine phosphatase (PSP1), encoding the protein catalyzing the final step of Ser synthesis, was depleted in the bou-2 mutant compared to the WT (Figure 2). This plastidial pathway is dependent on the precursor molecule 3-PGA sourcing from the Calvin–Benson–Bassham Cycle (CBBC) or plastidal glycolysis. Out of 33 genes encoding for enzymes of these pathways 22 were downregulated at one or both time points in bou-2, including most subunits of rubisco (Figure 4).
FIGURE 4

(A) Schematic presentation of the Calvin–Benson–Bassham cycle (CBBC). (B) Transcript levels (n = 3) of genes involved in CBBC. Left two tiles of each gene represent the log2-fold change (FC) between the bou-2 mutant and WT plants under both day (D) and night (N) with false color code ranging from red (higher in bou-2) to blue (higher in WT). Right two tiles represent the log2-fold change (FC) between day and night within WT plants and bou-2 mutant with false color code ranging from green (higher at night) to yellow (higher at day). Asterisks indicate differential gene expression as determined by Sleuth (∗FDR < 0.05, ∗∗FDR < 0.01, and ∗∗∗FDR < 0.001). CP12, CP12 domain-containing protein; FBPase, fructose bisphosphatase; GAP-DH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; PGK, phosphoglycerate kinase; PRK, phosphoribulokinase; RCA, rubisco activase; RPE, ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase; RPI, ribose-5-phosphate isomerase; Rubisco, ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase; SBPASE, sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase; TKL, transketolase.
The glycerate route of Ser synthesis is fed by 3-PGA produced by cytosolic glycolysis. Ten genes encoding for enzymes of cytosolic glycolysis, including enolase, FBA, GAP-DH, PFK, phosphoglycerate mutase and pyruvate kinase were more abundant in leaves of the bou-2 mutant (Figure 5). Apparently, also transcript abundances of the two alternative pathways of Ser synthesis cannot explain Ser accumulation in the bou-2 mutant. Since metabolite accumulation can not only be a consequence of enhanced production, but also of reduced consumption, we assessed the use of Gly and Ser in sulfur assimilation and the flux of S into major sulfur pools, namely GSH, GLS and protein.
FIGURE 5

(A) Schematic presentation of glycolysis. (B) Transcript levels of genes encoding for enzymes highlighted in gray boxes in panel A. Left two tiles of each gene represent the log2-fold change (FC) between the bou-2 mutant and WT plants under both day (D) and night (N) with false color code ranging from red (higher in bou-2) to blue (higher in WT). Right two tiles represent the log2-fold change (FC) between day and night within WT plants and the bou-2 mutant with false color code ranging from green (higher at night) to yellow (higher at day). Asterisks indicate differential gene expression as determined by Sleuth (∗FDR < 0.05, ∗∗FDR < 0.01, and ∗∗∗FDR < 0.001). HXK, hexokinase; PGI, phosphoglucose isomerase; PFK, phosphofructokinase; FBA, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase; TPI, triosephosphate isomerase; GAP-DH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; PGK, phosphoglycerate kinase; PGlyM, phosphoglycerate/bisphosphoglycerate mutase; PK, Pyruvate kinase.
Consequences of Reduced GDC Activity and Day/Night on Sulfur Metabolism
Reduced GDC Activity Mediated a Decline in Sulfur Flux Into Major Sulfur Pools in the bou-2 Mutant
Sulfate uptake into the leaves was reduced during night compared to day and was lower in bou-2 than in WT leaves at both, day and night (Figure 6). These significant differences were observed despite similar or even enhanced (WT, night) pool sizes of sulfate (Figure 6). In WT leaves, reduced sulfate uptake in the night also reduced the flux of sulfate into GSH, protein, and GLS. Again, this was observed at similar pool sizes of Cys, GSH, protein and GLS. During day, the flux of sulfate into the GSH, protein, and GLS pools was strongly reduced in bou-2 compared to WT leaves. However, this was accompanied by a strongly enhanced Cys and GSH pool in bou-2, whereas the protein and GLS pools were only slightly affected. During the night the flux of sulfate into GLS, but not into GSH or protein was reduced in bou-2 mutant (Figure 6). Pool sizes of Cys and GSH in bou-2 leaves were slightly reduced in the night compared to the day but still remained significantly higher than in WT controls (Figure 6). These results suggest that a reduced flux of sulfur into GSH and protein may have contributed to the observed accumulation of Ser and Gly in bou-2 leaves. The high pool sizes of Cys and GSH in bou-2 at both day and night cannot be attributed to the shift from elevated to ambient CO2, because thiol levels were also enhanced in leaves of bou-2 compared to the WT at similar protein content, when plants were harvested before this shift (Supplementary Figure S3). Although the sulfur flux in the bou-2 mutant is reduced, the high pool size of GSH and Cys is presumably due to their lower consumption in anabolic and/or catabolic processes.
FIGURE 6

Foliar sulfur metabolite content and sulfur fluxes in the A. thaliana WT and the bou-2 mutant during day and night. Asterisks indicate significant differences as determined by Student’s t-test (∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001). All values are means ± standard deviation of 4 replicates.
Reduced GDC Activity in the bou-2 Mutant Mediated Deregulation of Genes of Sulfur Reduction and Assimilation
In sulfur metabolism depicted in Figure 7, more genes were significantly changed during the night than during the day in bou-2 compared to WT leaves. The expression of ATP sulfurylase that catalyses the activation of sulfate at the very first step of assimilatory sulfate reduction was significantly lower in the mutant at night compared to the WT (Figure 7). The cytosolic ATPS gene (ATPS2) showed a significant increase in the transcript level in bou-2 at day compared to night. This is in agreement with strongly reduced 35S uptake by the mutant compared to the WT and by both the WT and the mutant at night compared to day (Figure 7). The APR1 and APR3 genes, which are considered the key regulatory enzyme of sulfate assimilation (
FIGURE 7

Schematic presentation (A) and transcript levels (B, n = 3) of genes involved in leaf sulfur metabolism. Left two tiles of each gene represent the log2- fold change (FC) between the bou-2 mutant and the WT plants at both day (D) and night (N) with false color code ranging from red (higher in bou-2) to blue (higher in WT). Right two tiles represent the log2-fold change (FC) between day and night within the WT plants and the bou-2 mutant with false color code ranging from green (higher at night) to yellow (higher at day). Asterisks indicate differential gene expression as determined by Sleuth (∗FDR < 0.05, ∗∗FDR < 0.01, and ∗∗∗FDR < 0.001). APS, adenosine 5′- phosphosulfate; Cys, cysteine; Cyst, cystathionine; Glu, glutamate; γ-GluCys, γ-glutamylcysteine; GSH, glutathione; GS-X, glutathione conjugate; Hcy, homocysteine; Met, methionine; OAS, O-acetylserine; OPH, O-phosphohomoserine; PAPS, 3′-phosphoadenosine 5′- phosphosulfate; ROH, hydroxylated precursor; SAH, S-adenosylhomocysteine; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine; Ser, serine; Thr, threonine; X-CysGly, cysteinylglycine conjugate. Enzymes: ATPS, ATP sulfurylase; APK, APS kinase; SOT, sulfotransferase; APR, APS reductase; SIR, sulfite reductase; SAT, serine acetyltransferase; OAS-TL, OAS(thiol)lyase; CGS, cystathionine gamma-synthase; TS, threonine synthase; CBL, cystathionine beta-lyase; MS, methionine synthase; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine synthetase; ECS, gamma -glutamylcysteine synthetase; GSHS, glutathione synthetase; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase.
In the bou-2 Mutant, Cys Is Largely Used for GSH While Its Use for Met and GLS Synthesis Is Reduced
In plants, Cys is used for protein synthesis either directly or after its metabolic conversion to methionine via cystathionine. In addition, Cys is used for GSH and GLS synthesis. In the present study, expression of the gene encoding γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ–ECS), the first step of GSH synthesis, was not significantly different between day and night for either WT or bou-2 leaves (Figure 7). In the WT, significant differences between day and night were not observed also in the transcript abundance of the gene encoding glutathione synthetase (GSH2) that produces GSH from γ-glutamylcysteine and glycine. However, at night the GSH2 transcript level was significantly higher in the mutant compared to the WT. Upregulation of GSH2 together with the significantly higher transcript level of SiR and OASA genes could explain the higher flux into GSH in the mutant at night (Figure 6). However, the almost five-fold higher content of GSH at day and the three-fold higher level at night in mutant compared to WT leaves as well as differences in the GSH pool of the mutant between night and day (Figure 6), could not completely be explained by changes in the transcript abundance of GSH2.
In the present study, it seems that Cys consumption for Met synthesis was reduced (Figures 7, 8A). Two first enzymes of Met biosynthesis, cystathionine γ-synthase (CGS1) and cystathionine β-lyase (CBL) did not show considerable differences in the transcript level between WT and bou-2 at day, but exhibited a significant decrease in the mutant at night compared to the WT (Figure 7). Still the chloroplastic methionine synthase (MS3) transcript level was significantly higher in the mutant at night (Figure 7). However, it seems that MS3 is not responsible for a major part of Met synthesis, as the Met content was significantly lower in the mutant at day and night compared to the WT. These differences in Met contents are consistent with significantly lower transcript levels of CGS and CBL genes in the mutant (Figure 7 and Table 1).
FIGURE 8

Cross-talk of sulfur with nitrogen assimilation and catabolic carbon metabolism. (A) Schematic presentation of amino acids and other metabolites which closely interact with sulfur metabolism in serine and cysteine biosynthesis analyzed in leaves of the A. thaliana WT and the bou-2 mutant at day and night exposure (n = 4). (B) Transcript levels (n = 3) of genes encoding for enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. Left two tiles represent the log2-fold change (FC) between the bou-2 mutant and the WT plants at both day (D) and night (N) exposure with false color code ranging from red (higher in bou-2) to blue (higher in WT). Right two tiles represent the log2-fold change (FC) between day and night exposure within the WT plants and bou-2 mutant with false color code ranging from green (higher at night) to yellow (higher at day). Asterisks indicate significantly different metabolite levels (A) as determined by Student’s t-test (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.00) or differential gene expression (B) as determined by Sleuth (∗FDR < 0.05, ∗∗FDR < 0.01, and ∗∗∗FDR < 0.001). 1, malate dehydrogenase (MDH); 2, citrate synthase (CSY); 3, aconitase (ACO); 4, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH); 5, 2-OG dehydrogenase (2OG DH); 6, Succinate-CoA ligase (ACL); 7, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH); 8, fumarase (FUM); 9, NAD-malic enzyme (NAD-ME); 10, pyruvate dehydrogenase.
Table 1
| Metabolites | Day | Night | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Col-0 | BOU | Col-0 | BOU | ||
| Mean SD | Mean SD | Mean SD | Mean SD | ||
| Sugars | Fructose | 2099.02 ± 251.05a* | 3128.45 ± 830.72* | 1301.38 ± 229.22a | 7401.39 ± 1774.24b |
| Glucose | 3587.00 ± 1178.37 | 2804.70 ± 428.45** | 2879.78 ± 400.50a | 8374.86 ± 1683.53b | |
| Maltose | 189.11 ± 67.26*** | 108.42 ± 10.53 *** | 648.76 ± 13.94a | 267.89 ± 11.22b | |
| Manose | 45.86 ± 11.28 | 34.38 ± 2.27* | 61.51 ± 4.59a | 46.14 ± 5.28b | |
| Raffinose | 152.52 ± 19.61a | 0.37 ± 0.30b | 237.985 ± 86.18a | 0.78 ± 0.74b | |
| Sorbitol | 43.79 ± 9.81a** | 29.55 ± 3.92b*** | 17.95 ± 2.31a | 11.59 ± 0.48b | |
| Sucrose | 27661.97 ± 3859.03 | 25636.56 ± 1699.43* | 28159.45 ± 1150.18a | 19927.22 ± 2573.64b | |
| Xylose | 88.33 ± 9.402 | 94.13 ± 10.99 | 92.26 ± 1.66 | 99.25 ± 7.33 | |
| Acids involved in TCA | Alpha-ketoglutarate | 24.95 ± 9.46a | 304.22 ± 56.91b* | 19.49 ± 0.90a | 200.92 ± 21.30b |
| Fumaric acid | 56114.14 ± 3677.00 | 40858.41 ± 9527.63 | 54647.13 ± 5059.05 | 51553.88 ± 2507.11 | |
| (Iso)citric acid | 1596.74 ± 664.04 | 1429.45 ± 387.71* | 949.93 ± 272.408 | 580.83 ± 357.611 | |
| Malic acid | 4412.55 ± 651.93 | 4701.32 ± 546.39* | 4509.1 ± 451.8a | 6160.18 ± 297.17b | |
| Proline | 104.85 ± 20.13* | 212.29 ± 64.24 | 57.74 ± 2.38 | 111.34 ± 36.35 | |
| Succinic acid | 349.30 ± 55.03a | 625.65 ± 148.07b* | 436.55 ± 20.61a | 901.08 ± 24.12b | |
| Secondary metabolites | Glycolic acid | 31.38 ± 2.88a** | 40.04 ± 2.23b*** | 19.96 ± 0.62a | 22.88 ± 0.28b |
| Shikimate | 340.53 ± 6.73a* | 192.09 ± 22.094b* | 411.33 ± 26.960a | 267.06 ± 37.963b | |
| Quinic acid | 1.75 ± 0.17** | 1.51 ± 0.072*** | 2.54 ± 0.09a | 2.86 ± 0.03b | |
| Amino acids | Alfa alanine | 1212.82 ± 203.49a** | 1910.62 ± 36.03b** | 564.43 ± 30.08a | 5831.68 ± 1123.55b |
| Aspartic acid | 20.54 ± 3.24a* | 8.31 ± 0.39b*** | 12.22 ± 2.33a | 19.57 ± 2.26b | |
| Beta-alanine | 34.30 ± 0.68a | 673.08 ± 98.08b | 35.54 ± 2.31a | 632.54 ± 100.52b | |
| GABA | 2774.76 ± 99.02a* | 4649.08 ± 367.88b | 2331.90 ± 182.87a | 4597.98 ± 752.32b | |
| Glyceric acid | 153.36 ± 32.22a* | 310.06 ± 21.39b*** | 90.48 ± 8.24a | 133.94 ± 5.85b | |
| Glycine | 637.59 ± 192.41a | 338399.99 ± 8441.71b | 423.50 ± 157.21a | 325863.04 ± 11640.42b | |
| (Iso)leucine | 11.32 ± 0.88a | 78.62 ± 25.44b* | 12.00 ± 1.97a | 16.75 ± 0.53b | |
| Leucine | 11.24 ± 0.24a | 73.48 ± 16.99b** | 12.97 ± 2.36 | 15.84 ± 1.61 | |
| Serine | 13.01 ± 0.33a*** | 52.78 ± 4.64b | 6.28 ± 0.76a | 63.91 ± 7.93b | |
| Threonine | 7.52 ± 1.09a*** | 41.38 ± 8.22b* | 2.01 ± 0.38a | 16.17 ± 5.34b | |
| Valine | 356.05 ± 101.33a** | 1169.77 ± 19.021b*** | 631.58 ± 8.99a | 717.51 ± 37.84b | |
| Sugar alcohols | Methionine | 6.374 ± 0.761a | 3.055 ± 0.679b | 4.950 ± 1.162a | 1.797 ± 0.955b |
| Glycerol | 1728.74 ± 83.86a | 2065.05 ± 40.31b* | 1816.16 ± 111.70a | 3055.49 ± 415.78b | |
| Organic acids | Mannitol | 98.69 ± 15.51 | 88.92 ± 5.43*** | 70.20 ± 17.21 | 42.33 ± 7.98 |
| Gluconic acid | 5.89 ± 0.34a* | 9.01 ± 1.77b | 4.39 ± 0.63 | 5.84 ± 0.95 | |
| Hydroxyglutarat | 28.58 ± 6.03a | 55.15 ± 1.38b*** | 40.25 ± 7.89 | 36.88 ± 1.94 | |
| Maleic acid | 57.91 ± 11.28 | 51.36 ± 7.60 | 54.06 ± 4.93 | 48.72 ± 7.45 | |
| Malonic acid | 0.86 ± 0.17a*** | 3.85 ± 0.88b | 2.61 ± 0.14 | 3.88 ± 0.78 | |
| Myoinositol | 2633.09 ± 246.98a** | 1085.52 ± 120.82b** | 4197.10 ± 364.20a | 1742.63 ± 211.04b | |
Metabolite contents present in arbitrary units (arb.u. mg-1 FW) in leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana WT and the bou-2 mutant at day and night.
Plants were grown at elevated (3000 ppm) CO2 and harvested after 24 h of ambient CO2 level ca. 10 min after light onset and 3 h before light onset. Small letters indicate significant differences between different plant types within same treatment (P < 0.05). Asterisks indicate significant differences between day and night within same plant type (∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001). All values are means ± standard deviation of 3 replicates.
Apart from sulfur consumption for GSH and Met, part of the sulfur taken up is used for the synthesis of secondary metabolites such as GLS. Transcript levels of the cytosolic APS kinase isoform APK1 were significantly downregulated in the bou-2 mutant at day compared to the WT, and together with APK3 also at night. Furthermore, both isoforms were significantly upregulated in the bou-2 mutant at day compared to night (Figure 7). The sulfotransferase genes SOT17 and SOT18, responsible for transferring the sulfate moiety from PAPS to the preferentially Met-derived desulfoglucosinolate (dsGS) (Piotrowski et al., 2004), showed a low transcript level in the mutant at night compared to the WT. However, this decrease did not affect the S flux into the GLS pool (Figure 6). Rather, the increased flux of S into GLS in the mutant at day compared to night might be a result of significantly higher transcript abundances of the APK1, APK3, SOT17, and SOT18 genes (Figures 6, 7).
High Cys and GSH Contents Are Not a Result of Reduced GSH and/or Protein Degradation
The transcript level of the GGT1 gene, encoding γ-glutamyltransferase, which catalyses the first step of GSH degradation, is significantly lower in the mutant at day and night compared to the WT at night (Figure 7). This result suggests that the high amount of Cys in the mutant is not a consequence of GSH degradation. This view is supported by high GSH contents of the mutant at day and night compared to WT leaves (Figure 6). The high Cys and GSH contents in the mutant also cannot be attributed to protein degradation, because protein contents in WT and mutant leaves are almost same both, at day and night (Figure 6).
Consequences of Reduced GDC Activity and Day/Night for the Metabolic Crosstalk of Sulfur With Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism
Reduced GDC Activity in the bou-2 Mutant Mediated Downregulation of Genes of Calvin–Benson–Bassham Cycle (CBBC) and Accumulation of Sugars
Reduced GDC activity in the bou-2 mutant excessively influenced gene transcript levels of most enzymes of the CBBC. 18 of 33 examined genes were downregulated in the mutant at both day and night compared to the WT (Figure 4). The GAPA-2 gene encoding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase together with PGK, PGK1 of phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) and genes of Rubisco subunits were significantly downregulated at day and night (Figure 4). As a consequence, foliar sugar accumulation was affected (Table 1). During day a slight increase in the fructose content at the expense of glucose was observed in leaves of the mutant. However, consequences of the mutation for sugar accumulation were much more pronounced at night. Fru and Glc accumulated 1.5 and 5.7 times more in the bou-2 mutant compared to the WT at day and night, respectively. In addition, maltose content decreased in the mutant to 57% and 41% of the WT level, while raffinose contents declined to 0.2 and 0.3% of the WT content, both at day and night, respectively. In leaves of the WT and the bou-2 mutant the contents of these sugars increased from day to night.
Reduced GDC Activity Mediated an Upregulation of Key Enzymes of the Glycolysis Pathway in the bou-2 Mutant
In glycolysis, sugars are oxidized to generate energy, pyruvate and building blocks for anabolic processes (
Reduced GDC Activity Mediated an Alternation of TCA Cycle Functions in the bou-2 Mutant by Upregulation of Genes and Accumulation of Intermediates
Intermediates of the TCA cycle were affected in the bou-2 mutant. The contents of malate, succinate and 2-OG increased in the mutant by 6, 44, and 92%, respectively, at day and by 27, 51, and 90%, respectively, at night (Figure 8A and Table 1). This accumulation may be attributed to a reduced use of TCA cycle intermediates in amino acid synthesis as indicated by reduced levels of Asp and Met at day and night (Figure 8A). On the other hand, Pro and Thr, also originating from TCA cycle intermediates, were increased in the mutant by 82 and 88%, respectively, for day and night (Figure 8A). Such an increase was also observed for a number of pyruvate derived amino acids, namely Ala, Val, Leu, and Ile (Figure 8A and Table 1), suggesting enhanced operation of glycolysis.
RNA-Seq results showed a significant upregulation of numerous genes of the TCA cycle in the mutant at day and night (Figure 8). All TCA cycle genes were downregulated at day compared to night in WT and mutant leaves except for three genes encoding mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase, namely SDH1-1, SDH2-1, and SHD3-1. Transcript abundances of these genes were significantly upregulated at day in the mutant compared to WT leaves (Figure 8). Transcript levels of the peroxisomal citrate synthase genes CSY2 and CSY3, involved in the sub-pathway of isocitrate synthesis from oxaloacetate (OAA) and acetyl-CoA, were two-fold higher in the mutant at day and night compared to the WT (Figure 8). Genes encoding for aconitase (ACO), which catalyzes the isomerization of citrate to isocitrate in the TCA cycle (Figure 8), showed upregulated transcript levels in the mutant at night (ACO1 and ACO2) or day and night (ACO3) compared to the WT (Figure 8). The ACO2 gene also showed significantly higher expression in the mutant at night compared to day (Figure 8). Upregulation of genes downstream of the sub-pathway of isocitrate synthesis coincided with a decrease in isocitrate content in the mutant at night (Figure 8A). However, higher accumulation of isocitrate was observed in the mutant at day compared to night (Table 1). This accumulation in the mutant could be a consequence of the downregulated transcript levels of genes encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) subunits I, V and VI, which catalyze the oxidative transformation of isocitrate to 2-OG (Figure 8). However, as for isocitrate, also accumulation of 2-OG was observed in the mutant at day compared to night (Figure 8A and Supplementary Dataset S1). The enhanced 2-OG content in the mutant at day might originate from different processes. The major mitochondrial IDH subunits (IDH-II, IDH-V IDH-VI) showed significantly increased transcription at night in the bou-2 mutant compared to the WT (Figure 8) that may result in enhanced 2-OG synthesis. Enhanced gene expression was also observed for succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) subunits that catalyze fumarate synthesis from succinate, specifically for SDH1-1, SDH2-1, SDH2-2, SDH3-2, SDH4, and SDH5 genes, in leaves of the bou-2 mutant at day and night compared to the WT (Figure 8). Also, genes encoding pyruvate dehydrogenase that transform pyruvate into acetyl-CoA were significantly upregulated in the bou-2 mutant at day and night (Figure 8). Together with the high amount of pyruvate derived amino acids (Figure 8A and Table 1) this result indicates an enhanced foliar supply of pyruvate in the mutant for both, the reactions of the TCA cycle and the synthesis of pyruvate derived amino acids.
Reduced GDC Activity Mediated Downregulation of Genes of Nitrogen Assimilation
Photorespiration effects not only carbon but also nitrogen metabolism (
Transcript abundance of the mitochondrial ASP1, cytosolic ASP2 and chloroplastic ASP3 genes of aspartate aminotransferase (AspAT) was two- to three-fold higher in the mutant at day and night compared to the WT. By contrast, the transcript level of the asparagine synthetase gene ASN1 was reduced more than three-fold in the bou-2 mutant at day compared to the WT and was significantly lower at day compared to night in the mutant (Figure 3). However, the ASN2 transcript level was enhanced in the mutant at day compared to the WT and compared to night of the mutant. In addition, glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH1) was upregulated in the mutant at night compared to the WT and compared to day (Figure 3) together with glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) and GABA aminotransferase (POP2). Upregulation of these genes indicates changes in Glu production and its use for GABA and succinate synthesis in the mutant (Figure 3). This view is supported by the high amounts of GABA and succinate in the mutant, especially at night (Figure 8A and Table 1).
Discussion
Reduced GDC Activity Mediated Alternation of Gene Expression and Metabolite Abundance of the Photorespiratory Pathway
In bou-2, major subunits or isoforms of GDC and SHMT (except SHMT3), the enzymes directly involved in Gly and Ser metabolism, as well as other key enzymes of photorespiration, including GLYK, GOX, HPR, and PGLP were down-regulated at either day, night or both (Figure 2A and Supplementary Figure S2). Despite remaining transcript level of genes encoding GDC subunits,
Studies with strong Arabidopsis mutants of PR enzymes revealed elevated substrate (or upstream substrate) and depleted product (or downstream product) pool sizes for the respective enzymes in response to a shift from high to low CO2 (Timm et al., 2008, 2012;
With reduced GDC activity, the source(s) of highly elevated Ser amounts was (were) of particular interest. Upregulation of major PGDH and PSAT isoforms at night in the bou-2 mutant are in favor of the phosphorylated pathway of Ser synthesis (Figure 2). However, slight down-regulation of PSP1, catalyzing the final step of this pathway, together with down-regulation of the majority of genes encoding enzymes of the CBBC as the source of 3-PGA (Figure 5) contradict this hypothesis. Of the known genes encoding for enzymes catalyzing the glycerate pathway of Ser biosynthesis, only SGAT, which is also involved in photorespiration, was slightly upregulated at day in the bou-2 mutant (Figure 2). The technical inability to distinguish glycerate from 3-PGA with the GC-MS setup applied precludes to draw conclusions from increased levels of glycerate (in particular at day), which hence could support either of the three ways of Ser biosynthesis.
In addition, formate from C1 metabolism can serve as an alternative source for Ser and, therefore, Ser synthesis via the C1–THF synthase/SHMT pathway that may constitute an alternative source of Ser used for Cys synthesis (
Responses of Sulfate Assimilation to Reduced GDC Activity Can Only Partially Be Explained by Changes in Gene Expression
The results of the present [35S]SO42- feeding experiments are consistent with earlier studies with WT Arabidopsis showing higher uptake and incorporation of sulfate into GSH, GLS and proteins at day compared to night (
In the bou-2 mutant, uptake of [35S]SO42- and its incorporation into GLS was higher at day than at night. RNASeq results of the present study showed significantly higher transcript level of ATPS2, APK1 APK3 together with SOT17 and SOT18 gene isoforms at day in the mutant compared to night. These results are consistent with previous studies of
However, sulfate reduction and Cys synthesis can be regulated at post-translation level by protein–protein interaction of the enzymes of this metabolic pathway and/or by sensing levels of downstream products of sulfate assimilation (
So far little is known about expression of the gene of ɣ–ECS. Studies of
The significantly lower flux of [35S]-sulfate into labeled proteins in the mutant at day, and the slightly lower flux at night compared to the WT indicate that Met was not depleted in the mutant by enhanced protein synthesis. The level of S-AdoMet (SAM), synthesized from Met by SAM synthase (SAMS), controls the sulfur flux partitioning between Met and Thr by activating Thr synthase (
Reduced GDC Activity Affects the Crosstalk of Sulfur Assimilation With Nitrogen and Carbon Metabolism
Interaction of C and N metabolism is strongly determined by the operation of the photorespiratory pathway (
N limitation decreases the transcript abundance of genes of amino acid synthesis (
The TCA cycle is a central metabolic hub for the interacting pathways of respiration, N assimilation and photorespiration and an important source of organic carbon intermediates such as 2-OG necessary for synthesis of amino acids (
When the photosynthetic processes and primary N assimilation are disturbed, it is important for plant survival to still maintain the C:N balance under these conditions. High amounts of 2-OG in the mutant at day may therefore constitute a consequence of intensified transamination between OAA and Glu. Further, Ala can be produced by transamination of pyruvate thereby converting Glu to 2-OG using a glutamate-alanine transaminase (
Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) can support aminotransferase action by channeling carbon from Glu into the TCA cycle (
The regulatory interaction between sulfate, nitrate and carbon metabolism has been established in number of studies (
Conclusion
In the present study [35S]SO42- flux experiment showed that Ser produced by photorespiration is the dominant precursor of Cys synthesis in photosynthetic tissue of A. thaliana WT during light (hypothesis 1). In addition, results of fluxes through the sulfur assimilation pathway together with content of sulfate containing metabolites showed that photorespiratory Ser biosynthesis in WT plants cannot be replaced by phosphorylated Ser production during night (contradicting our hypothesis 2). However, these changes were not followed by day/night changes in transcript level of genes of sulfate reduction and assimilation pathway presumably due to growing preconditions (contradicting our hypothesis 3). Impaired photorespiration significantly disturbed sulfate metabolism in the bou-2 mutant. The [35S]SO42- uptake and fluxes in mutant were heavily decreased while the content of sulfur-rich metabolites were strongly increased compared to the WT. The results showed that high amount of Cys and other sulfur-rich metabolites do not originate from alternative phosphorylated Ser production (contradicting our hypothesis 2). However, C1–THF synthase/SHMT pathway could contribute to Ser and therefore Cys synthesis in bou-2 mutant and should be further investigated. The RNAseq results showed that changes in sulfate reduction and assimilation in bou-2 mutant could only be partially explained by transcriptional regulation (hypothesis 3). Besides the changes in sulfate metabolism, the reduced GDC activity in bou-2 mutant deregulates CBBC and TCA, cycle, glycolysis, amino acid synthesis, and nitrogen and carbon assimilation. Thus, changes in sulfate metabolism in bou-2 mutant are consequences of complex interaction and crosstalk of S, C and N metabolism. The photorespiratory Ser production can be replaced by other metabolic Ser sources but this has as a consequence the disruption of cross-talk of S, C and N metabolism. For a better understanding of the regulation of S assimilation and its crosstalk with C and N metabolism at impaired photorespiration, further studies of transcription factors and specific sensing mechanisms are required.
Statements
Data availability statement
The read data have been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE86380 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE86380).
Author contributions
HR and AW conceived the experiments. SS and NR designed the experiments. SS, NR, and SF performed the experiments. SS, DB, and TM-A analyzed data. SS and DB generated the figures and tables. SK, TM-A, LA, NR, and FK contributed reagents, materials, and analytical tools. SS, DB, HR, and SA wrote the manuscript.
Funding
This work was financially supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG) under contract number RE 515/45-1 and the Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS, EXC 1028) to TM-A and AW. The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this work through research group no RG-1435-018. The article processing charge was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the University of Freiburg in the funding program Open Access Publishing.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of E. Klemp, K. Weber, and M. Graf for GC-MS and HPLC measurements.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.01709/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AmirR.HachamY.GaliliG. (2002). Cystatione γ-synthase and threonine synthase operate in concert to regulate carbon flow towards methionine in plants.Trends Plant Sci.7153–156. 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02227-6
2
AubertS.BlignyR.DouceR.GoutE.RatcliffeR. G.RobertsJ. K. M. (2001). Contribution of glutamate dehydrogenase to mitochondrial glutamate metabolism studied by 13C and 31P nuclear magnetic resonance.J. Exp. Bot.5237–45. 10.1093/jexbot/52.354.37
3
BatushanskyA.KirmaM.GrillichN.PhamP. A.RentschD.GaliliG.et al (2015). The transporter GAT1 plays an important role in GABA-mediated carbon-nitrogen interactions in Arabidopsis.Front. Plant Sci.61–10. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00785
4
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing.J. R. Stat. Soc.57289–300.
5
BensteinR. M.LudewigK.WulfertS.WittekS.GigolashviliT.Henning FrerigmannH.et al (2013). Arabidopsis phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase1 of the phosphoserine pathway is essential for development and required for ammonium assimilation and tryptophan biosynthesis.Plant Cell255011–5029. 10.1105/tpc.113.118992
6
BraderG.MikkelsenM. D.HalkierB. A.PalviaE. T. (2006). Altering glucosinolate profiles modulates disease resistance in plants.Plant J.46758–767. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02743.x
7
BradfordM. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.Anal. Biochem.72248–254. 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
8
BrayN. L.PimentelH.MelstedP.PachterL. (2016). Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification.Nat. Biotechnol.34525–527. 10.1038/nbt.3519
9
BrownP. D.TokuhisaJ. G.ReicheltM.GershenzonJ. (2003). Variation of glucosinolates accumulation among different organs and developmental stages of Arabidopsis thaliana.Phytochemistry62471–481. 10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00549-6
10
CobbettC. S.MayM. J.HowdenR.RollsB. (1998). The glutathione-deficient, cadmium-sensitive mutant, cad2–1, of Arabidopsis thaliana is deficient in γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase.Plant J.1673–78. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00262.x
11
DelleroY.Lamothe-SiboldM.JossierM.HodgesM. (2015). Arabidopsis thaliana ggt1 photorespiratory mutants maintain leaf carbon/nitrogen balance by reducing RuBisCO content and plant growth.Plant J.831005–1018. 10.1111/tpj.12945
12
EisenhutM.PlanchaisS.CabassaC.Guivarc´hA.JustinA.-M.TaconnatL.RenouJ.-P.et al (2013). Arabidopsis a bout de souffle is a putative mitochondrial transporter involved in photorespiratory metabolism and is required for meristem growth at ambient CO2 levels.Plant J.73836–849. 10.1111/tpj.12082
13
EisenhutM.HockenN.WeberA. P. (2015). Plastidial metabolite transporters integrate photorespiration with carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur metabolism.Cell Calcium5898–104. 10.1016/j.ceca.2014.10.007
14
EngelN.EwaldR.GuptaK. J.ZrennerR.HagemannM.BauweH. (2011). The presequence of Arabidopsis serine hydroxymethyltransferase SHM2 selectively prevents import into mesophyll mitochondria.Plant Physiol.157:1711–1720. 10.1104/pp.111.184564
15
FiehnO.KopkaJ.DörmannP.AltmannT.TretheweyR. N.WillmitzerL. (2000). Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics.Nat. Biotechnol.181157–1161. 10.1038/81137
16
FoyerC. H.NoctorG. (2000). Oxygen processing in photosynthesis: regulation and signalling.Rev. Lit. Arts Am.146359–388. 10.1093/jxb/erv018
17
FoyerC. H.NoctorG.HodgesM. (2011). Respiration and nitrogen assimilation: targeting mitochondria-associated metabolism as a means to enhance nitrogen use efficiency.J. Exp. Bot.621467–1482. 10.1093/jxb/erq453
18
GauthierP.P.G.BlignyR.GoutE.MahéA.NoguésS.HodgesM.TcherkezG.G.B. (2010). In folio isotopic tracing demonstrates that nitrogen assimilation into glutamate is mostly independent from current CO2 assimilation in illuminated leaves of Brassica napus.New Phytol.185988–999. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03130.x
19
GullnerG.KömivesT.RennenbergH. (2001). Enhanced tolerance of transgenic poplar plants overexpressing gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase towards chloroacetanilide herbicides.J. Exp. Bot.52971–979. 10.1093/jexbot/52.358.971
20
GuptaD. K.HuangH. G.YangX. E.RazafindrabeB. H. N.InouheM. (2010). The detoxification of lead in Sedum alfredii H. is not related to phytochelatins but the glutathione.J. Hazard. Mater.177437–444. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.052
21
HaasF. H.HeegC.QueirozR.BauerA.WirtzM.HellR. (2008). Mitochondrial serine acetyltransferase functions as a pacemaker of cysteine synthesis in plant cells.Plant Physiol.1481055–1067. 10.1104/pp.108.125237
22
HeJ.LiH.MaC.ZhangY.PolleA.RennenbergH.et al (2015). Overexpression of bacterial γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase mediates changes in cadmium influx, allocation and detoxification in poplar.New Phytol.205240–254. 10.1111/nph.13013
23
HerschbachC.GesslerA.RennenbergH. (2012). Long-distance transport and plant internal cycling of N- and S-compounds.Progr. Bot.73161–188. 10.1007/978-3-642-22746-2_6
24
HerschbachC.van der ZalmE.SchneiderA.JouaninL.De KokL. J.RennenbergH. (2000). Regulation of sulphur nutrition in wild type and transgenic poplar over-expresing γ-glutamylsysteine synthetase in the cytosol as affected by atmospheric H2S.Plant Physiol.124461–473. 10.1104/pp.124.1.461
25
HesseH.KreftO.MaimannS.ZehM.HoefgenR. (2004). Current understanding of the regulation of methionine biosynthesis in plants.J. Exp. Bot.551799–1808. 10.1093/jxb/erh139
26
HesseH.TrachselN.SuterM.KoprivaS.von BallmoosP.RennenbergH.et al (2003). Effect of glucose on assimilatory sulfate reduction in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana.J. Exp. Bot.541701–1709. 10.1093/jxb/erg177
27
HildebrandtT. M.NesiA. N.AraújoW. L.BraunH. P. (2015). Amino acid catabolism in plants.Mol. Plant.81563–1579. 10.1016/j.molp.2015.09.005
28
HirelB.LeaP.J. (2002). “The biochemistry, molecular biology and genetic manipulation of primary ammonia assimilation,” in Photosynthetic Nitrogen Assimilation and Associated Carbon and Respiratory Metabolism. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respirationvol. 12edsFoyerC. H.NoctorG. (Amsterdam: Springer).
29
HusebyS.KoprivovaA.LeeB. R.SahaS.MithenR.WoldA.-B.et al (2013). Diurnial and light regulation of sulphur assimilation and glucosinolate biosynthesis in Arabidopsis.J. Exp. Bot.641039–1048. 10.1093/jxb/ers378
30
JangJ. C.LeónP.ZhouL.SheenJ. (1997). Hexokinase as a sugar sensor in higher plants.Plant Cell95–19. 10.1105/tpc.9.1.5
31
KeysA. J.BirdI. F.CorneliusM. J.LeaP. J.MiflinB. J.WallsgrooveR. M. (1978). Photorespiratory nitrogen cycle.Nature275741–743. 10.1038/275741a0
32
KocsisM. G.RanochaP.GageD. A.SimonE. S.RhodesD.PeelG. J.et al (2003). Insertional inactivation of the methionine S-Methyltransferase gene eliminates the S-Methylmethionine cycle and increases the methylation ratio.Plant Physiol.1311808–1815. 10.1104/pp.102.018846
33
KoprivaS.MuheimR.KoprivovaA.TrachselN.CatalanoC.SuterM.et al (1999). Light regulation of assimilatory sulfate reduction in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant J.2037–4410.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00573.x
34
KoprivaS.RennenbergH. (2004). Control of sulphate assimilation and glutathione synthesis: interaction with N and C metabolism.J. Exp. Bot.551831–1842. 10.1093/jxb/erh203
35
KoprivaS.SuterM.von BallmoosP.HesseH.KrähenbühlU.RennenbergH.et al (2002). Interaction of sulfate assimilation with carbon and nitrogen metabolism in Lemna minor.Plant Physiol.122737–746. 10.1104/pp.007773
36
KoprivovaA.KoprivaS. (2014). Molecular mechanisms of regulation of sulfate assimilation: first steps on long road.Front. Plant Sci.51–10. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00589
37
KoprivovaA.NorthK. A.KoprivaS. (2008). Complex signaling network in regulation of adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate reductase by salt stress in Arabidopsis roots.Plant Physiol.1461408–1420. 10.1104/pp.107.113175
38
KoprivovaA.SuterM.den CampR. O.BrunoldC.KoprivaS. (2000). Regulation of sulfate assimilation by nitrogen in arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.122737–746. 10.1104/pp.122.3.737
39
LappartientA. G.VidmarJ. J.LeustekT.GlassA. D. M.TourianeB. (1999). Inter-organ signalling in plants: regulation of ATP sulfurylase and sulfate transporter genes expression in roots mediated by phloem-translocated compound.Plant J.1889–95. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00416.x
40
LemaîtreT.Laure GaufichonL.Boutet-MerceyS.ChristA.Masclaux-DaubresseC. (2008). Enzymatic and metabolic diagnostic of nitrogen deficiency in Arabidopsis thaliana wassileskija accession.Plant Cell Physiol.491056–1065. 10.1093/pcp/pcn081
41
LiR.MooreM.KingJ. (2003). Investigating the regulation of one-carbon metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant Cell Physiol.44233–241. 10.1093/pcp/pcg029
42
MayM. J.VernouxT.Sanchez-FernandezR.Van MontaguM.InzéD. (1998). Evidence for posttranscriptional activation of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase during plant stress responses.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.9512049–12054. 10.1073/pnas.95.20.12049
43
MichaeliS.FaitA.LagorK.Nunes-NesiA.GrillichN.YellinA.et al (2011). A mitochondrial GABA permease connects the GABA shunt and the TCA cycle, and is essential for normal carbon metabolism.Plant J.67485–498. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04612.x
44
MiflinB. J.HabashD. Z. (2002). The role of glutamine synthetase and glutamate dehydrogenase in nitrogen assimilation and possibilities for improvement in the nitrogen utilization of crops.J. Exp. Bot.53979–987. 10.1093/jexbot/53.370.979
45
MugfordS. G.LeeB-R.KoprivovaA.MatthewmanC.KoprivaS. (2011). Control of sulfur portioning between primary and secondary metabolism.Plant J.6596–105. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04410.x
46
MurashigeT.SkoogF. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures.Physiol. Plant15473–497. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
47
NielsenT. H.KrappA.Röper-SchwarzK. U.StittM. (1998). The sugar-mediated regulation of genes encoding the small subunit of Rubisco and the regulatory subunit of ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase is modified by phosphate and nitrogen.Plant Cell Environ.21443–454. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00295.x
48
NoctorG.ArisiA. C. M.JouaninL.KunertK. J.RennenbergH.FoyerC. H. (1998). Glutathione: biosynthesis, metabolism and relationship to stress tolerance explored in transformed plants.J. Exp. Bot.49623–647. 10.1093/jxb/49.321.623
49
NoctorG.MhamdiA.ChaouchS.HanY.NeukermansJ.Marquez-GarciaB.et al (2012). Glutathione in plants: an integrated overview.Plant Cell Environ.35454–484. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02400.x
50
NoctorG.StrohmM.JouaninL.KunertK. J.FoyerC. H.RennenbergH. (1996). Synthesis of glutathione in leaves of transgenic poplar overexpressing [gamma]-glutamylcysteine synthetase.Plant Physiol.1121071–1078. 10.1104/pp.112.3.1071
51
NojiM.InoueK.KimuraN.GoudaA.SaitoK. (1998). Isoform-dependent differences in feedback regulation and subcellular localization of serine acetyltransferase involved in cysteine biosynthesis from Arabidopsis thaliana.J. Biol. Chem.27332739–32745. 10.1074/jbc.273.49.32739
52
NovitskayaL.TrevanionS. J.DriscollS.FoyerC. H.NoctorG. (2002). How does photorespiration modulate leaf amino acid contents? A dual approach through modelling and metabolite analysis.Plant Cell Environ.25821–835. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00866.x
53
Nunes-NesiA.FernieA. R.StittM. (2010). Metabolic and signaling aspects underpinning the regulation of plant carbon nitrogen interactions.Mol. Plant3973–996. 10.1093/mp/ssq049
54
PaulM. J.DriscollS. P. (1997). Sugar repression of photosynthesis: the role of carbohydrates in signalling nitrogen deficiency through source: sink imbalance.Plant Cell Environ.9783–798. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-17.x
55
PengM.BiY-M.ZhuT.RothsteinS. J. (2007). Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis responsive transcriptome to nitrogen limitation and its regulation by the ubiquitin ligase gene NLA.Plant Mol. Biol.65775–797. 10.1007/s11103-007-9241-0
56
PimentelH. J.BrayN.PuenteS.MelstedP.PachterL. (2016). Differential analysis of RNA-Seq incorporating quantification uncertainty.Nat. Methods14687–690. 10.1038/nmeth.4324
57
PiotrowskiM.SchemenwitzA.LopukhinaA.MüllerA.JanowitzT.WeilerE. W.et al (2004). Desulfoglucosinolate sulfotransferases from Arabidopsis thaliana catalyze the final step in the biosynthesis of the glucosinolate core structure.J. Biol. Chem.27950717–50725. 10.1074/jbc.M407681200
58
PlaxtonW. C. (1996). The organization and regulation of plant glycolysis.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.47 (1): 185–214. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.185
59
RademacherN.KernR.FujiwaraT.Mettler-AltmannT.MiyagishimaS.-Y.HagemannM.et al (2016). Photorespiratory glycolate oxidase is essential for the survival of the red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae under ambient CO2 conditions.J. Exp. Bot.673165–3175. 10.1093/jxb/erw118
60
RavanelS.BlockM. A.RippertP.JabrinS.CurienG.RébeilléF.et al (2004). Methionine metabolism in plants.J. Biol. Chem.27922548–22557. 10.1074/jbc.M313250200
61
RennenbergH.HerschbachC. (2014). A detailed view on sulphur metabolism at the cellular and whole-plant level illustrates challenges in metabolite flux analyses.J. Exp. Bot.655711–5724. 10.1093/jxb/eru315
62
ReuvenyZ.DougallD. K.TrinityP. M. (1980). Regulatory coupling of nitrate and sulfate assimilation pathways in cultured tobacco cells.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.776670–6672. 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6670
63
RobinsonS. A.SladeA. P.FoxG. G.Phillips George RatcliffeR.StewartG. R. (1991). The role of glutamate dehydrogenase in plant nitrogen metabolism.Plant Physiol.95509–516. 10.1104/pp.95.2.509
64
RosR.Cascales-MiñanaB.SeguraJ.AnomanA. D.ToujaniW.Flores-TorneroM.Rosa-TellezS.Muñoz-BertomeuJ. (2013). Serine biosynthesis by photorespiratory and non-photorespiratory pathways: an interesting interplay with unknown regulatory networks.Plant Biol.15707–712. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00682.x
65
RossoM. G.YongL.StrizhovN.ReissB.DekkerK.WeisshaarB. (2003). An Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA mutagenized population (GABI-Kat) for flanking sequence tag-based reverse genetics.Plant Mol. Biol.53247–259. 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000009297.37235.4a
66
SauterM.MoffattB.SaechaoM. C.HellR.WirtzM. (2013). Methionine salvage and S-adenosylmethionine: essential links between sulfur, ethylene and polyamine biosynthesis.Biochem. J.451145–154. 10.1042/BJ20121744
67
ScheererU.HaenschR.MendelR. R.KoprivaS.RennenbergH.HerschbachC. (2010). Sulphur flux through the sulphate assimilation pathway is differently controlled by adenosine 5′ phosphosulphate reductase under stress and in transgenic poplar plants overexpressing γ-ECS, SO, or APR.J. Exp. Bot.61609–622. 10.1093/jxb/erp327
68
SchuppR.RennenbergH. (1988). Diurnal changes in the glutathione content of spruce needles (Picea abies L.).Plant Sci.57113–117. 10.1016/0168-9452(88)90076-3
69
SomervilleC. R.OgrenW. L. (1982). Mutants of the cruciferous plant Arabidopsis thaliana lacking glycine decarboxylase activity.Biochem. J.202373–380. 10.1042/bj2020373
70
StrohmM.JouaninL.KunertK. J.PruvostC.PolleA.FoyerC. H.et al (1995). Regulation of glutathione synthesis in leaves of transgenic poplar (Populus tremula x P. alba) overexpressing glutathione synthetase.Plant J.7141–145. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.07010141.x
71
TakahashiH.KoprivaS.GiordanoM.SaitoK.HellR. (2011). Sulfur assimilation in photosynthetic organisms: molecular function and regulation of transporters and assimilatory enzymes.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.62157–184. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103921
72
TimmS.MielewczikM.FlorianA.FrankenbachS.DreissenA.HockenN.et al (2012). High-to-low CO2 acclimation reveals plasticity of the photorespiratory pathway and indicates regulatory links to cellular metabolism of Arabidopsis.PLoS One7:e42809. 10.1371/journal.pone.0042809
73
TimmS.Nunes-NesiA.PärnikT.MorgenthalK.WienkoopS.KeerbergO.et al (2008). A cytosolic pathway for the conversion of hydroxypyruvate to glycerate during photorespiration in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell202848–2859. 10.1105/tpc.108.062265
74
VauclareP.KoprivaS.FellD.SuterM.SticherL.Von BallmoosP.et al (2002). Flux control of sulfate assimilation in Arabidopsis thaliana: adenosine 5′-phosphosulphate reductase is more susceptible than ATP sulphurylase to negative control by thiols.Plant J.31729–740. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01391.x
75
VollL. M.JamaiA.RennéP.VollH.McClungR.WeberA. P. M. (2006). The photorespiratory arabidopsis shm1 mutant is deficient in SHM1.Plant Physiol.14059–66. 10.1104/pp.105.071399
76
WangR.GueglerK.LaBrieS. T.CrawfordN. M. (2000). Genomic analysis of a nutrient response in Arabidopsis reveals diverse expression patterns and novel metabolic and potential regulatory genes induced by nitrate.Plant Cell121491–1509. 10.1105/tpc.12.8.1491
77
WangR.OkamotoM.XingX.CrawfordN. M. (2003). Microarray analysis of the nitrate response in Arabidopsis roots and shoots reveals over 1,000 rapidly responding genes and new linkages to glucose, trehalose-6-phosphate, iron, and sulfate metabolism.Plant Physiol.132556–567. 10.1104/pp.103.021253
78
WirtzM.BeardK. F. M.LeeC. P.BoltzA.SchwarzländerM.FuchsC.et al (2012). Mitochondrial cysteine synthase complex regulates O-Acetylserine biosynthesis in plants.J. Biol. Chem.28727941–27947. 10.1074/jbc.M112.372656
79
ZhangY.SunK.SandovalF. J.SantiagoK.RojeS. (2010). One-carbon metabolism in plants: characterization of a plastid serine hydroxymethyltransferase.Biochem. J.43097–105. 10.1042/BJ20100566
Summary
Keywords
cysteine synthesis, glutathione, glycine, glycolysis, nitrogen assimilation, photorespiration, serine production, TCA cycle
Citation
Samuilov S, Brilhaus D, Rademacher N, Flachbart S, Arab L, Alfarraj S, Kuhnert F, Kopriva S, Weber APM, Mettler-Altmann T and Rennenberg H (2018) The Photorespiratory BOU Gene Mutation Alters Sulfur Assimilation and Its Crosstalk With Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1709. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01709
Received
07 August 2018
Accepted
02 November 2018
Published
27 November 2018
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited by
Hans-Henning Kunz, Washington State University, United States
Reviewed by
Astrid Wingler, University College Cork, Ireland; Christine Helen Foyer, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2018 Samuilov, Brilhaus, Rademacher, Flachbart, Arab, Alfarraj, Kuhnert, Kopriva, Weber, Mettler-Altmann and Rennenberg.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sladjana Samuilov, sladjana.samuilov@ctp.uni-freiburg.de
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Plant Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.