Abstract
Over recent years, the cultivation of hops (Humulus lupulus L.) has spread widely in the Mediterranean, also affecting the southern regions of Spain and Italy with a typical semi-arid climate. Several and recent studies have investigated the responses of this species to the main abiotic stresses, which is an aspect of absolute relevance to the knowledge of the adaptive capacity of hops to the growing conditions of a new cultivation environment. Moreover, given the fact that hops’ phytochemical composition is determined primarily by genetic and environmental factors, and that the species is perennial, the lack of knowledge on the effects of abiotic stress could be reflected in subsequent years, which means multi-year economic risks. This review work therefore aims to showcase, based on an in-depth investigation of the available literature, the response of hop to the main abiotic stresses, and the effect of these on productive and qualitative crop performances. The data presented will be useful to the understanding of constraints and to the identification of useful coping strategies to the cultivation of hops in semi-arid Mediterranean environments.
Introduction
According to the prediction on climate models for the southern Mediterranean regions, a decrease in winter precipitation and an increase in the number of heat waves compared to previous decades will take place in next years (Beniston et al., 2007). Indeed, Earth surface temperature is expected to rise gradually on a global scale, and major changes are likely to occur in the hydrological and energy cycles (IPCC, 2001). Therefore, in the next decades, mankind will probably experience dramatic and threatening changes in regional extreme weather and climate events. Being “fixed” to their growth substrate, plants are supposed to be particularly exposed to changes in the frequency and intensity of extreme events (i.e., heat waves, heavy precipitation, droughts, etc.) (Christensen and Christensen, 2003; Goyette et al., 2003; Beniston, 2004; Schär et al., 2004; Ulbrich et al., 2001). An additional constraint is linked to the frequent simultaneous occurrence of two, or three, abiotic (and biotic) stressors, whose combination is mostly lethal to crops (Mittler, 2006), as much as that this “combined stress” is considered as a new and special complex stressor (Bai et al., 2018).
However, almost all vascular plants have developed in time several morphological and physiological adaptations to enable their survival under harsh conditions. Open field crops are almost always subjected to stressors coming from the surrounding environment, and that is the reason why it’s very hard that field crops on farms achieve their full yield potential, and huge yield gaps are highlighted, e.g., when field crops are compared to crops grown for experimental purposes (Lobell et al., 2009; Van Ittersum et al., 2013).
On the other side, the need to assess the climatic effects on quality is particularly relevant for some crops in which technological quality derives mainly from the aromatic-sensory and gustatory components (Ahmed et al., 2014).
In hop (Humulus lupulus L.) several breeding programs have focused on improving agronomic performances, introducing characteristics such as resistance to biotic and abiotic stressors, reduced growth capacity (“dwarf” varieties), together with the improvement of yields and organoleptic characteristics of production (Hampton et al., 2001). To date, although numerous studies have already confirmed the excellent productive and qualitative response of hops grown in the Mediterranean environments (Mongelli et al., 2015; Rossini et al., 2016; Ruggeri et al., 2018; Marceddu et al., 2020; Rossini et al., 2021; Figures 1, 2), there’s still the lack of knowledge on the effects of abiotic stresses on hop yield and quality. Since hop is a perennial crop, abiotic stresses might reflect in cone yields in subsequent growing seasons, representing a multi-year economic risk for farmers who decide to invest in this crop in a new environment such as the southern regions of the Mediterranean.
Figure 1
Pictures taken during the first year of hop cultivation in a Sicilian semi-arid environment at the “Sparacia” farm (37°38’07” N; 13°45’47” E; 450 m a.s.l.), Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences (D/SAAF), University of Palermo.
Figure 2
Hop bines before 2022 harvest at the “Sparacia” farm (37°38’07” N; 13°45’47” E; 450 m a.s.l.), Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences (D/SAAF), University of Palermo.
Hops are mainly cultivated for the beer industry as a source of secondary metabolites (i.e., α-acids, β-acids and aromatic oils), which give the characteristic bitterness and aroma, as well as antimicrobial properties to the brewing products (Neve, 1991). These substances are contained in the lupulin glands that develop mainly in the female inflorescences, and their amount increases as reproductive plant stages go on (i.e., from the appearance of cones to their full growth) (de Keukeleire et al., 2007).
Several studies have been carried out on the factors influencing the biosynthesis of these compounds. The biosynthesis of α-acids, β-acids and prenylated flavonoids involves extremely complex biosynthetic pathways (Goese et al., 1999; Paniego et al., 1999; Okada and Ito, 2001), that can be affected in many steps by several external factors, such as area of cultivation, phytosanitary status and age of crops (Jelínek et al., 2012; Matoušek et al., 2016; Morcol et al., 2020; Eriksen et al., 2021). It appears that, as with other plant secondary metabolites, both the genotype and the environment play a key role in determining their final concentration (Almaguer et al., 2014; Moore et al., 2014; Morcol et al., 2020).
This review work, therefore, aims to present the response of hop to three common abiotic stresses (salinity, heat, and drought), and the effects of these on crop productive and qualitative performances.
Salinity stress
Among all the abiotic stressors, salinity is one of the major threats to crops’ productivity in semi-arid environments, due to its increased occurrence in farms with irrigated crops (Flowers, 2004). Salt stress persistence throughout plants’ growth cycles might lead to co-occurrence with other stressors, either abiotic or biotic, way more than drought or heat stress, which often occurs at various intermittent periods either preceding or following pathogen infection (Kissoudis et al., 2014). In general, all plants respond to saline stress with morphological and physiological modifications, responsible for the adaptation of the osmotic potential, thanks to the involvement of different genes and pathways (Julkowska and Testerink, 2015). Also, plant hormones appeared to have a key role in the response to salinity stress as reported by several researchers in different plant species (Golldack et al., 2014; Ryu and Cho, 2015; Tao et al., 2015).
However, limited research has been devoted to studying the basis of salinity tolerance in hops. Unquestionably, this species might adapt to multiple hostile conditions, determined by the presence of abiotic stressors such as salinity, activating all those mechanisms already well defined for most vascular plants, i.e., the alteration of cytoplasmic free Ca2+, the activation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase, the production of secondary signaling molecules such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and abscisic acid (ABA), and the activation of the salt overly sensitive (SOS) pathway for regulation and maintenance of ion homeostasis (Julkowska and Testerink, 2015).
In a field study with hops cultivars over a range of different cultivation sites, Dabbous-Wach et al. (2021) assessed the good acclimatization of German hop cultivars to the Corsican environment one year after planting, even though high levels of soil salinity were detected in most of the growing sites. A noticeable change in plant morphology was detected after the first year of cultivation: some plants showed a shortening of side shoots, and, considering the lower number of cones in the side shoots per plant, also reduced cone yields. From the phytochemical point of view, the essential oil of these genotypes showed a higher amount of myrcene (characterized by spicy and balsamic herbal notes) and α−humulene (woody notes), and lower α−selinene (herbal notes). Hence, a definite compositional and aroma difference was assessed between hops grown in the coastal areas and others from inner Corsica; although salinity could not be claimed as the only cause of these variations, it was certainly involved in the combined co-presence of the high salinity of soils, water scarcity, and wind, acting as a multiple stressor on cultivated plants. Interestingly, it appeared that not all the varieties reacted in the same way, as they have not been directly improved for salinity resistance, showing also very important information for growers to make a proper choice of hop cultivars that suit better to the local growing conditions, and that would be consistent with the outcomes of a recent research carried out in a semi-arid Mediterranean environment (Carrubba et al., 2022).
Drought and heat stress
Numerous molecular and metabolic-related studies found that plants’ responses to the combination of heat and drought stress are unique and should be evaluated jointly rather than individually (Pnueli et al., 2002; Rizhsky et al., 2002; Rizhsky et al., 2004; Suzuki et al., 2005; Potopová et al., 2021). That is the reason for these stressors to be presented jointly in this paragraph.
In a Mediterranean environment, characterized by high temperatures throughout all hop growth season, an inverse correlation was shown between plant growth and productivity and heat accumulation, especially in the vegetative development stages (Marceddu et al., 2020). High temperatures (HT) and low-water (LW) stress during the growing season have consistently been shown to decrease hop cone yield and bitter acid content of cones (Srečec et al., 2004; Mozny et al., 2009; Nakawuka et al., 2017; Donner et al., 2020).
A recent study carried out by Donner et al. (2020) found a significant negative correlation between summer air temperature and α−acids content in several Czech cultivars (cv. “Saaz”, “Sladek” and “Premiant”). Mozny et al. (2009) also highlighted a decrease in cone yield in growing seasons with low precipitation and a decreased α-acids content in cv. “Saaz” hops during high-temperature years. Similar reductions in cones and α-acids yields under combined LW and HT conditions were also found in the cv. “Aurora” in Croatia (Srečec et al., 2004) and Slovenia (MacKinnon et al., 2020). In a study carried out by Nakawuka et al. (2017) in the Washington State (U.S.), a significant decrease in cone yields under reduced irrigation was assessed, even though no significant effect was assessed on bitter acid content in several American varieties (e.g., “Mt Hood”, “Columbus”, “Chinook”, and “Willamette”).
Nevertheless, limited research has been carried out on hop mechanisms and structural traits resulting from drought stress (Gloser et al., 2013; Korovetska et al., 2014; Korovetska et al., 2016).
On a general basis, it is well known that the main effects of drought stress on plant growth and development are determined by water relation disorders as well as modification of water use efficiency, with a major impact on the relative water content in green tissues, leaf water potential, osmotic potential, pressure potential and transpiration rate (Farooq et al., 2009; Farooq et al., 2012). Changes in the pH, ABA, and sulphate concentration in xylem sap were suggested as long-distance drought signals also for hop plants (Gloser et al., 2013; Korovetska et al., 2014; Korovetska et al., 2016), even though there is still no certainty about the role of these metabolites in the drought response of the species. In a trial carried out by Kolenc et al. (2016), the drought stress response of two Slovenian hop cultivars grown in pots was assessed by combining physiological studies and proteomic analysis. According to these findings, hop plants showed decreased transpiration rate and water potential during reduced water availability, experiencing a decrease in photosynthesis due to stomatal and non-stomatal limitation and a strong decrease in photosynthetic proteins and proteins of the energetic metabolism, affecting plant fitness in general. Also, a very interesting study was carried out by Eriksen et al. (2021) who looked at physiological traits and differential gene expression in leaf, stem, and root tissue in plants of the cv “Cascade” exposed to HT stress, LW stress, and a combination of both. In the above experiment, the cultivation trial took place in growth chambers where the imposed stress conditions were able to impress substantial changes to the transcriptome. Significant reductions in the expression of numerous genes were detected, which resulted in a decrease in agronomically important secondary metabolite biosynthesis, e.g., bitter acids. However, as reported by the same Authors, other studies found no reductions in α−acids content under LW stress (Nakawuka et al., 2017) or cultivar-specific reactions to LW and HT stresses (Donner et al., 2020), suggesting possible cultivar-based differences in the temperature tolerance range, that could be exploited to develop breeding lines with increased resilience to abiotic stress.
Heat stress-wise, it is known that plants exposed to high temperatures might manifest various symptoms, deriving from the drastic limitation of their photosynthetic activity (Berry and Bjorkman, 1980). Allakhverdiev and coworkers (2008) identified three components of the photosynthetic system that are sensitive to heat damage, namely the photosystems themselves, the ATP-generating electron transport chain, and the carbon assimilation process. According to other research also, heat resulted to affect photosystem II by causing the dissociation of Manganese (Mn) from the oxygen-evolving complex, but also by disrupting the distribution of absorbed light energy from the light-harvesting complex (Enami et al., 1994; Enami et al., 1998; Nash et al., 1985; Pastenes and Horton, 1996).
The disruption of membrane fluidity caused by heat, also, determines the breakdown of the thylakoid membrane integrity, which leads to disruptions in the electron transport chain and ATP synthesis (Gounaris et al., 1983; Inaba and Crandall, 1988). Moreover, HT stress was found responsible for the destruction of the Rubisco activase protein, leading to the inactivation of the carboxylating enzyme and, therefore, to the disruption of carbon assimilation (Salvucci et al., 2001; Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner, 2004; Sharkey, 2005). In six hop cultivars exposed to HT (within a range of temperatures from 15 to 45°C), Eriksen et al. (2020) highlighted that all the tested plants achieved maximal carbon assimilation at temperatures ranging from 21 to 39°C without the availability of water being a limiting factor. When the temperatures reached and overpassed 41°C, all plants experienced severe stress, showing decline in carbon assimilation, due to multiple effects on the cell, including damage to photosystem II (PSII), damage to membrane integrity as reflected in electrolyte leakage at high temperatures, and declines in Rubisco activity probably due to deactivation of Rubisco-activase enzyme. According to these findings, “Cascade” and “Southern Brewer” appeared to be better candidates for use as breeding lines to improve abiotic stress tolerance than “Chinook”, which appeared to be particularly susceptible to extreme heat stress.
Conclusions
Biosynthesis pathways of secondary metabolites in hops, and therefore concentration levels in cones, proved very sensitive to stress conditions such as salinity, LW and HT. Such sensitivity is variable according to many factors, including genotype, intensity and duration of stress, the simultaneous occurrence of two or more stressors, but also phenology of the plant. For example, the stage of cone development is one of the most crucial for flavor compounds biosynthesis in hops, therefore representing a key moment for the success of hop cultivation. Even though HT stress is difficult to avoid in the field, LW stress should be minimized in irrigated systems during this period. In this sense, agrotechnical care is an essential tool to obtain satisfactory production levels, above all when those to be managed are new crops in new areas of cultivation. The findings from the research above might represent valuable information for growers developing hopyards in the increasingly warm regions of the Mediterranean. However, it also emerged that some hop genotypes are better adapted than others to environmental constraints, and are, therefore, more suitable to highly demanding cultivation areas. The proper choice of the right variety given the environmental context is a key point to successfully manage this challenging crop.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
AC conceived the project. RM and AC wrote the manuscript. RM, AC, and MS revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AhmedS.SteppJ. R.OriansC.GriffinT.MatyasC.RobbatA.et al. (2014). Effects of extreme climate events on tea (Camellia sinensis) functional quality validate indigenous farmer knowledge and sensory preferences in tropical China. PloS One9 (10), e109126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109126
2
AllakhverdievS. I.KreslavskiV. D.KlimovV. V.LosD. A.CarpentierR.MohantyP. (2008). Heat stress: an overview of molecular responses in photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Res.98 (1), 541–550. doi: 10.1007/s11120-008-9331-0
3
AlmaguerC.SchönbergerC.GastlM.ArendtE. K.BeckerT. (2014). Humulus lupulus–a story that begs to be told. a review. J. Institute Brewing120 (4), 289–314. doi: 10.1002/jib.160
4
BaiY.KissoudisC.YanZ.VisserR. G. F.van der LindenG. (2018). Plant behaviour under combined stress: tomato responses to combined salinity and pathogen stress. The plant journal. 93 (4), 781–793. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13800
5
BenistonM. (2004). The 2003 heat wave in Europe: A shape of things to come? an analysis based on Swiss climatological data and model simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett.31, L02202. doi: 10.1029/2003GL018857
6
BenistonM.StephensonD. B.ChristensenO. B.FerroC. A.FreiC.GoyetteS.et al. (2007). Future extreme events in European climate: an exploration of regional climate model projections. Climatic Change81 (1), 71–95. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9226-z
7
BerryJ.BjorkmanO. (1980). Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.31 (1), 491–543. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.002423
8
CarrubbaA.MarcedduR.SarnoM. (2022). Hop (Humulus lupulus l.): suitability of traditional cultivars to a low-trellis farming system in a semi-arid environment. HortScience57 (11), 1409–1415. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI16754-22
9
ChristensenJ. H.ChristensenO. B. (2003). Severe summertime flooding in Europe. Nature421 (6925), 805–806. doi: 10.1038/421805a
10
Dabbous-WachA.RodolfiM.PaoliniJ.CostaJ.GaninoT. (2021). Characterization of wild Corsican hops and assessment of the performances of German hops in Corsican environmental conditions through a multidisciplinary approach. Appl. Sci.11 (9), 3756. doi: 10.3390/app11093756
11
de KeukeleireJ.JanssensI.HeyerickA.GhekiereG.CambieJ.Roldán-RuizI.et al. (2007). Relevance of organic farming and effect of climatological conditions on the formation of α-acids, β-acids, desmethylxanthohumol, and xanthohumol in hop (Humulus lupulus l.). J. Agric. Food Chem.55, 61–66. doi: 10.1021/jf061647r
12
DonnerP.PokornýJ.JežekJ.KroftaK.PatzakJ.PulkrábekJ. (2020). Influence of weather conditions, irrigation and plant age on yield and alpha-acids content of Czech hop (Humulus lupulus l.) cultivars. Plant Soil Environ.66 (1), 41–46. doi: 10.17221/627/2019-PSE
13
EnamiI.KitamuraM.TomoT.IsokawaY.OhtaH.KatohS. (1994). Is the primary cause of thermal inactivation of oxygen evolution in spinach PS II membranes release of the extrinsic 33 kDa protein or of Mn? Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Bioenergetics1186 (1-2), 52–58. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(94)90134-1
14
EnamiI.KikuchiS.FukudaT.OhtaH.ShenJ. R. (1998). Binding and functional properties of four extrinsic proteins of photosystem II from a red alga, Cyanidium caldarium, as studied by release-reconstitution experiments. Biochemistry37 (9), 2787–93. doi: 10.1021/bi9724624
15
EriksenR. L.Padgitt-CobbL. K.TownsendM. S.HenningJ. A. (2021). Gene expression for secondary metabolite biosynthesis in hop (Humulus lupulus l.) leaf lupulin glands exposed to heat and low-water stress. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 1–18. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84691-y
16
EriksenR. L.RuttoL. K.DombrowskiJ. E.HenningJ. A. (2020). Photosynthetic activity of six hop (Humulus lupulus l.) cultivars under different temperature treatments. HortScience55 (4), 403–409. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI14580-19z
17
FarooqM.HussainM.WahidA.SiddiqueK.H.M. (2012). Drought Stress in Plants: An Overview. In: Aroca, R. (Ed) Plant Responses to Drought Stress. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-32653-0_1
18
FarooqM.WahidA.KobayashiN. S. M. A.FujitaD.B.S.M.A.BasraS. M. A. (2009). “Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management,” in Sustainable agriculture (Dordrecht: Springer), 153–188. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_12
19
FlowersT. J. (2004). Improving crop salt tolerance. J. Exp. Bot.55 (396), 307–319. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh003
20
GloserV.BalazM.JupaR.KorovetskaH.SvobodaP. (2013). The response of Humulus lupulus to drought: the contribution of structural and functional plant traits. Acta Hortic.1010, 149–154. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.1010.17
21
GoeseM.KammhuberK.BacherA.ZenkM. H.EisenreichW. (1999). Biosynthesis of bitter acids in hops. a 13C-NMR and 2H-NMR study on the building blocks of humulone. Eur. J. Biochem.263, 447–454. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00518.x
22
GolldackD.LiC.MohanH.ProbstN. (2014). Tolerance to drought and salt stress in plants: unraveling the signaling networks. Front. Plant Sci.5. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00151
23
GounarisK.BrainA. P.QuinnP. J.WilliamsW. P. (1983). Structural and functional changes associated with heat-induced phase-separations of non-bilayer lipids in chloroplast thylakoid membranes. FEBS Lett.153 (1), 47–52. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(83)80117-3
24
GoyetteS.BrasseurO.BenistonM. (2003). Application of a new wind gust parameterization: Multiscale case studies performed with the Canadian regional climate model. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres108 (D13), 4374. doi: 10.1029/2002JD002646
25
HamptonR.SmallE.HaunoldA. (2001). Habitat and variability of Humulus lupulus var. lupuloides in upper Midwestern north America: A critical source of American hop germplasm. J. Torrey Botanical Soc.128 (1), 35–46. doi: 10.2307/3088658
26
InabaM.CrandallP. G. (1988). Electrolyte leakage as an indicator of high-temperature injury to harvested mature green tomatoes. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.113 (1), 96–99. doi: 10.21273/JASHS.113.1.96
27
IPCC (2001). ) climate change 2001: the scientific basis (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), p 881.
28
JelínekL.DolečkováM.KarabinM.HudcovaT.KotlikovaB.DostalekP. (2012). Influence of growing area, plant age, and virus infection on the contents of hop secondary metabolites. Czech J. Food Sci.30 (6), 541–547. doi: 10.17221/50/2012-CJFS
29
JulkowskaM. M.TesterinkC. (2015). Tuning plant signaling and growth to survive salt. Trends in Plant Sci.20 (9), 586–94. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.06.008
30
KissoudisC.van de WielC.VisserR. G. F.van der LindenG. (2014). Enhancing crop resilience to combined abiotic and biotic stress through the dissection of physiological and molecular crosstalk. Front Plant Sci.5, 207. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00207
31
KolencZ.VodnikD.MandelcS.JavornikB.KastelecD.ČerenakA. (2016). Hop (Humulus lupulus l.) response mechanisms in drought stress: Proteomic analysis with physiology. Plant Physiol. Biochem.105, 67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.03.026
32
KorovetskaH.NovákO.JůzaO.GloserV. (2014). Signalling mechanisms involved in the response of two varieties of humulus lupulus L. to soil drying: I. changes in xylem sap pH and the concentrations of abscisic acid and anions. Plant Soil380 (1), 375–387. doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2101-1
33
KorovetskaH.NovákO.TurečkováV.HájíčkováM.GloserV. (2016). Signalling mechanisms involved in the response of two varieties of humulus lupulus L. to soil drying: II. changes in the concentration of abscisic acid catabolites and stress-induced phytohormones. Plant Growth Regul.78 (1), 13–20. doi: 10.1007/s10725-015-0058-6
34
LobellD. B.CassmanK. G.FieldC. B. (2009). Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.34, 179–204. doi: 10.1146/annurev.environ.041008.093740
35
MacKinnonD.PavlovičV.ČehB.NagličB.PavlovičM. (2020). The impact of weather conditions on alpha-acid content in hop (Humulus lupulus l.) cv. aurora. Plant Soil Environ.66 (10), 519–525. doi: 10.17221/344/2020-PSE
36
MarcedduR.CarrubbaA.SarnoM. (2020). Cultivation trials of hop (Humulus lupulus L. in semi-arid environments. Heliyon6 (10), e05114. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05114
37
MatoušekJ.KocábekT.PatzakJ.BřízaJ.SiglováK.MishraA. K.et al. (2016). The “putative” role of transcription factors from HlWRKY family in the regulation of the final steps of prenylflavonid and bitter acids biosynthesis in hop (Humulus lupulus l.). Plant Mol. Biol.92 (3), 263–277. doi: 10.1007/s11103-016-0510-7
38
MittlerR. (2006). Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends Plant Sci.11 (1), 15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.11.002
39
MongelliA.RodolfiM.GaninoT.MarieschiM.Dall’AstaC.BruniR. (2015). Italian Hop germplasm: characterization of wild Humulus lupulus l. genotypes from northern Italy by means of phytochemical, morphological traits and multivariate data analysis. Ind. Crops Products70, 16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.02.036
40
MooreB. D.AndrewR. L.KülheimC.FoleyW. J. (2014). Explaining intraspecific diversity in plant secondary metabolites in an ecological context. New Phytol.201 (3), 733–750. doi: 10.1111/nph.12526
41
MorcolT. B.NegrinA.MatthewsP. D.KennellyE. J. (2020). Hop (Humulus lupulus l.) terroir has large effect on a glycosylated green leaf volatile but not on other aroma glycosides. Food Chem.321, 126644. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126644
42
MoznyM.TolaszR.NekovarJ.SparksT.TrnkaM.ZaludZ. (2009). The impact of climate change on the yield and quality of saaz hops in the Czech republic. Agric. For. Meteorol.149 (6-7), 913–919. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.02.006
43
NakawukaP.PetersT. R.KennyS.WalshD. (2017). Effect of deficit irrigation on yield quantity and quality, water productivity and economic returns of four cultivars of hops in the Yakima valley, Washington state. Ind. Crops Products98, 82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.01.037
44
NashD.MiyaoM.MurataN. (1985). Heat inactivation of oxygen evolution in photosystem II particles and its acceleration by chloride depletion and exogenous manganese. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Bioenergetics807 (2), 127–133. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(85)90115-X
45
NeveR. A. (1991). “The cultivated hop,” in Hops (Dordrecht: Springer), 25–47.
46
OkadaY.ItoK. (2001). Cloning and analysis of valerophenone synthase gene expressed specifically in lupulin gland of hop (Humulus lupulus l.). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.65 (1), 150–155. doi: 10.1271/bbb.65.150
47
PaniegoN. B.ZuurbierK. W.FungS. Y.van der HeijdenR.SchefferJ. J.VerpoorteR. (1999). Phlorisovalerophenone synthase, a novel polyketide synthase from hop (Humulus lupulus l.) cones. Eur. J. Biochem.262 (2), 612–616. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00444.x
48
PastenesC.HortonP. (1996). Effect of high temperature on photosynthesis in beans (II. CO2 assimilation and metabolite contents). Plant Physiol.112 (3), 1253–1260. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.3.1253
49
PnueliL.Hallak-HerrE.RozenbergM.CohenM.GoloubinoffP.KaplanA.et al. (2002). Molecular and biochemical mechanisms associated with dormancy and drought tolerance in the desert legume retama raetam. Plant J.31 (3), 319–330. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01364.x
50
PotopováV.LhotkaO.MožnýM.MusiolkováM. (2021). Vulnerability of hop-yields due to compound drought and heat events over European key-hop regions. Int. J. Climatol.41(Suppl. 1), E2136–E2158. doi: 10.1002/joc.6836
51
RizhskyL.LiangH.MittlerR. (2002). The combined effect of drought stress and heat shock on gene expression in tobacco. Plant Physiol.130 (3), 1143–1151. doi: 10.1104/pp.006858
52
RizhskyL.LiangH.ShumanJ.ShulaevV.DavletovaS.MittlerR. (2004). When defense pathways collide. the response of arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant Physiol.134 (4), 1683–1696. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.033431
53
RossiniF.LoretiP.ProvenzanoM. E.De SantisD.RuggeriR. (2016). Agronomic performance and beer quality assessment of twenty hop cultivars grown in central Italy. Ital. J. Agron.11 (3), 180–187. doi: 10.4081/ija.2016.746
54
RossiniF.VirgaG.LoretiP.IacuzziN.RuggeriR.ProvenzanoM. E. (2021). Hops (Humulus lupulus l.) as a novel multipurpose crop for the Mediterranean region of Europe: Challenges and opportunities of their cultivation. Agriculture11 (6), 484. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11060484
55
RuggeriR.LoretiP.RossiniF. (2018). Exploring the potential of hop as a dual purpose crop in the Mediterranean environment: Shoot and cone yield from nine commercial cultivars. Eur. J. Agron.93, 11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2017.10.011
56
RyuH.ChoY. G. (2015). Plant hormones in salt stress tolerance. J. Plant Biol.58 (3), 147–155. doi: 10.1007/s12374-015-0103-z
57
SalvucciM. E.OsteryoungK. W.Crafts-BrandnerS. J.VierlingE. (2001). Exceptional sensitivity of rubisco activase to thermal denaturation in vitro and in vivo. Plant Physiol.127 (3), 1053–1064. doi: 10.1104/pp.010357
58
SalvucciM. E.Crafts-BrandnerS. J. (2004). Mechanism for deactivation of Rubisco under moderate heat stress. PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM122, 513–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2004.00419.x
59
SchärC.VidaleP. L.LüthiD.FreiC.HäberliC.LinigerM. A.et al. (2004). The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves. Nature427 (6972), 332–336. doi: 10.1038/nature02300
60
SharkeyT. D. (2005). Effects of moderate heat stress on photosynthesis: importance of thylakoid reactions, rubisco deactivation, reactive oxygen species, and thermotolerance provided by isoprene. Plant Cell Environ.28 (3), 269–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01324.x
61
SrečecS.KvaternjakI.KaučićD.MarićV. (2004). Dynamics of hop growth and accumulation of α–acids in normal and extreme climatic conditions. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus69 (2-3), 59–62.
62
SuzukiN.RizhskyL.LiangH.ShumanJ.ShulaevV.MittlerR. (2005). Enhanced tolerance to environmental stress in transgenic plants expressing the transcriptional coactivator multiprotein bridging factor 1c. Plant Physiol.139 (3), 1313–1322. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.070110
63
TaoJ. J.ChenH. W.MaB.ZhangW. K.ChenS. Y.ZhangJ. S. (2015). The role of ethylene in plants under salinity stress. Front. Plant Sci.6. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01059
64
UlbrichU.FinkA. H.KlawaM.PintoJ. G. (2001). Three extreme storms over Europe in December 1999. Weather56 (3), 70–80. doi: 10.1002/j.1477-8696.2001.tb06540.x
65
Van IttersumM. K.CassmanK. G.GrassiniP.WolfJ.TittonellP.HochmanZ. (2013). Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance - a review. Field Crops Res.143, 4–17. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.009
Summary
Keywords
abiotic stress, multiple stresses, crop performances, plant physiology, proteomics
Citation
Marceddu R, Carrubba A and Sarno M (2022) Resilience of hop (Humulus lupulus L.) to salinity, heat and drought stresses: A mini-review. Front. Plant Sci. 13:1064922. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1064922
Received
08 October 2022
Accepted
14 November 2022
Published
30 November 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Laura Siracusa, National Research Council (CNR), Italy
Reviewed by
Nataša Štajner, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Marceddu, Carrubba and Sarno.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alessandra Carrubba, alessandra.carrubba@unipa.it
This article was submitted to Plant Metabolism and Chemodiversity, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.